Social Media

Topic reminder, please stay somewhere near the OP, this is not the place for history lessons or Bush in Iraq. Further off topic posts removed @Neeranam next removal will be more than posts. 'Swear on Allah': French 12 year old antisemitic rape victim told to convert to Islam

Reported off topic response and reply removed.

A recent study published in JAMA Pediatrics links a significant rise in infant deaths in Texas to the state's stringent abortion ban enacted in 2021. The study, conducted by analysts from Johns Hopkins University and Michigan State University, investigated infant mortality rates following the implementation of the Texas heartbeat law, which effectively banned abortions around 5 to 6 weeks into pregnancy. This law, passed in September 2021, was one of the most restrictive in the nation at the time, prohibiting abortions after the detection of a fetal heartbeat, typically around six weeks of gestation. The researchers found a troubling increase in infant deaths in Texas between 2021 and 2022. The number of infant deaths rose from 1,985 to 2,240, representing a 12.8 percent increase, compared to a 1.8 percent increase across the rest of the United States during the same period. This spike in Texas's infant mortality rate significantly outpaced the national average, which only saw a modest increase. Prior to this law, Texas permitted abortions up to 22 weeks of pregnancy. The new restrictions, however, made no exceptions for cases of rape or incest, nor for congenital anomalies or birth defects. The study also highlighted a notable rise in congenital anomalies in Texas, which increased by 22.9 percent, contrasting sharply with a 3.1 percent decrease in such cases across the rest of the country. The researchers noted that the Texas heartbeat law's implementation appeared to correlate with increased infant deaths, particularly due to congenital anomalies among infants who were in early gestation when the law took effect. This correlation suggests that the restrictive abortion policies may have unintended and severe consequences on infant health. The study's findings were released on the two-year anniversary of the Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade, which had previously granted a constitutional right to abortion since 1973. This landmark ruling empowered states to impose their own abortion regulations, leading to a wave of restrictive abortion laws in several Republican-led states, including Texas. Dr. Alison Gemmill, one of the study's lead authors, emphasized the relevance of these findings in light of the Supreme Court's ruling. She stated, "These findings suggest that restrictive abortion policies may have important unintended consequences in terms of infant health and the associated trauma to families and medical costs." This study underscores the broader implications of such policies, indicating that they may not only impact women's reproductive rights but also have far-reaching effects on infant mortality and family well-being. Researchers employed statistical modeling and analyzed publicly available death-certificate data from January 2018 to December 2022 to arrive at these conclusions. Another research paper published last year corroborated these findings, linking nearly 10,000 additional live births in Texas to the state's abortion ban. The study’s release and its alarming findings provide a crucial perspective on the real-world impacts of restrictive abortion legislation, highlighting the need for further examination and discussion on the implications for public health and policy. Credit: Hill 2024-06-26 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Reducing knife crime will become a "moral mission" for Labour if they win the upcoming general election, Sir Keir Starmer will declare on Tuesday. He plans to work closely with victims' families and survivors, aiming to cut knife-related incidents by half within a decade. However, the Tories criticize Starmer’s tenure leading the Crown Prosecution Service, arguing that Labour's proposals would regress the country to previous issues. As Labour’s leader, Sir Keir Starmer will unveil a comprehensive strategy to tackle knife crime, promising the establishment of a new cross-government "coalition" that will involve families of victims, survivors, tech companies, and other relevant organizations. Furthermore, he will commit to chairing an annual knife crime summit to monitor progress toward the goal. He will emphasize that knife crime transcends party politics, urging for collaborative efforts across all political factions. Starmer will highlight the devastating impact of knife crime, pointing to the countless grieving families who have lost loved ones to brutal acts of violence often perpetrated by children. He will underscore the shared responsibility of political leaders to work together to eliminate knife crime and ensure the safety of young people. Labour's data indicates that knife-related offences have surged by 81% since 2015 across England and Wales. In response, the party's post-election commitments include tougher penalties for carrying knives, including custodial sentences for the most serious offences, and expanding the list of prohibited knives. Additionally, Labour will launch a new "Young Futures" programme aimed at supporting young people in local communities. Sir Keir Starmer’s vision encompasses a broad coalition and multi-faceted approach to address the knife crime epidemic, with a steadfast commitment to making significant strides within the next decade. Credit: Sky News 2024-06-26 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Birmingham election candidate Akhmed Yakoob has issued an apology and vowed to "fight misogyny" after facing backlash over comments he made on a podcast earlier this year. Yakoob, who is running as an independent candidate in Birmingham Ladywood, had previously come third in the West Midlands mayoral election in May. The controversy stems from remarks Yakoob made during an episode of the Minted Minds podcast, where he stated that "70% of hell is going to be women" and made inappropriate comments regarding domestic violence. During a discussion, a fellow guest suggested giving his wife a "backhander" if she made money dancing on TikTok. Yakoob, a criminal defense lawyer, responded, "Brother, are you saying if she comes up in your personal space, you will defend yourself?" These comments were met with condemnation from the Muslim Women’s Network UK (MWN), which described them as "deeply disturbing" and questioned Yakoob's judgment and values. In response to the outcry, Yakoob expressed remorse, stating, "I am mortified to listen back to this recording. While banter in an informal setting can often be crude, I should have refused to take part, since the tone of that discussion represents everything I stand against." Yakoob further emphasized his commitment to addressing misogyny, saying, "Voters in Ladywood will not fall for attempts to distract them from the tens of thousands of civilian women who have been killed in Gaza. But I have learned lessons from this and wish to wholeheartedly apologise. My promise to the women of Ladywood is that, in fighting misogyny, they will always have an ally in me." Yakoob's campaign focuses significantly on support for Palestine, with campaign posters urging voters to "lend Gaza your vote." The Minted Minds podcast episode, initially advertised as an "emergency meeting" to discuss Palestine, veered into topics concerning women and masculinity. Yakoob's comments included stating that "70% of hell will be women" in response to another guest's remarks about "empowered" women being followers of Dajjaal, a false Messiah or liar in Islam. During a discussion on how men should behave around women, Yakoob commented, "How much can you lower your gaze? […] It’s natural for men to be attracted to females, so keep our queens at home." The MWN found Yakoob's comments, along with his support for Andrew Tate—who is awaiting trial in Romania on charges of human trafficking and rape—alarming. "We strongly encourage all women to closely examine candidates’ positions on crucial issues such as violence against women and girls and equality," the MWN stated. Credit: The Guardian 2024-06-26 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In a stark warning to the French electorate, President Emmanuel Macron cautioned that a victory for either the far-left or far-right in the upcoming snap election could lead to "civil war." Macron's remarks come amid a tense political climate as France prepares to vote in a parliamentary election triggered by his coalition's recent defeat by the far-right National Rally in the European election. Speaking on the podcast "Generation Do It Yourself," Macron articulated his concerns about the divisive policies pursued by both the far-left France Unbowed and Marine Le Pen’s far-right National Rally. He argued that these policies exacerbate tensions between communities and undermine social cohesion. According to Macron, the far right's approach to addressing insecurity reduces individuals to their religion or origin, fostering an environment ripe for civil conflict. Similarly, he accused the far-left, under the leadership of Jean-Luc Mélenchon, of promoting division through electioneering tactics aimed at appealing to specific religious or ethnic groups. Macron's comments reflect broader anxieties within his administration regarding the potential consequences of a polarized political landscape. With recent polls indicating that the National Rally could secure 35 percent of the vote in the first round of the election, ahead of a left-wing alliance, which includes France Unbowed, at 27 percent, and Macron’s centrists at 19 percent, the stakes are high. The president's allies have been vocal in their warnings about the economic and social risks posed by a shift towards the extremes. They argue that such a shift could lead to economic instability and increased societal conflict. Macron, however, took these warnings a step further by explicitly stating that the rise of political extremes could culminate in civil war. He emphasized the dangers of turning to extremist solutions out of frustration with daily hardships, urging voters to reject divisive rhetoric and policies. This election represents a critical juncture for France, as the potential influx of far-right members into the National Assembly could significantly alter the country's political dynamics. Macron's dire predictions aim to galvanize centrist support and dissuade voters from opting for radical alternatives. The outcome of this election will not only determine the composition of the French government but also potentially set the course for the nation's future social and political stability. Credit: Politico 2024-06-26 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In a surprising revelation, a top-secret US Navy submarine prototype, known as the "Manta Ray," has been spotted by keen-eyed users on Google Maps, revealing the sophisticated aquatic drone to the public. The vessel, which has drawn comparisons to Star Wars spacecraft due to its futuristic design, was seen docked at Port Hueneme naval base in California, sparking widespread interest and intrigue. Satellite images of the Manta Ray, which is part of a cutting-edge naval project developed by Northrop Grumman, went viral over the weekend. The vessel's sleek and smooth profile stood out against other docked ships, making it easily identifiable even from satellite view on both Google Maps and Google Earth. The Manta Ray is named after the sea creature for its streamlined design and capability to anchor itself on the ocean floor while operating in low-power mode. This autonomous underwater drone is designed to operate for extended periods without needing refueling, thanks to its efficient buoyancy-driven gliding system, which allows it to traverse the ocean depths with minimal energy consumption. Dr. Kyle Woerner, Manta Ray program manager at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), highlighted the significance of the vessel in a press release. "Our successful, full-scale Manta Ray testing validates the vehicle’s readiness to advance toward real-world operations," Woerner stated. "The craft is designed with several payload bays of multiple sizes and types to enable a wide variety of naval mission sets." One of the standout features of the Manta Ray is its modular design. This allows the drone to be disassembled and transported using ordinary shipping containers, bypassing the need for dedicated port facilities and enhancing its deployment flexibility. The Navy has spent over three months testing the Manta Ray off the coast of Southern California, demonstrating its capabilities and potential applications. The development of the Manta Ray is seen as a strategic move by the US Navy to counteract the growing underwater capabilities of adversaries like Russia and China. Both countries have been advancing their own underwater drone technologies. Russia, in particular, has claimed that its underwater drones can cover ranges of up to 6,200 miles, can be armed with nuclear warheads, and can achieve speeds of up to 100 knots (approximately 115 mph). The sighting of the Manta Ray on Google Maps underscores the increasing visibility and public awareness of top-secret military technology in the digital age. Despite its classified nature, the vessel's appearance on a publicly accessible platform highlights the challenges of maintaining secrecy in an era where satellite imagery and digital mapping tools are widely available. While the US Navy has not officially commented on the Google Maps sighting, the Manta Ray’s public exposure raises questions about operational security and the measures taken to safeguard advanced military technologies. Nonetheless, the Manta Ray represents a significant leap forward in underwater drone technology, offering new capabilities and strategic advantages for the US Navy in its ongoing efforts to maintain maritime superiority. As the Manta Ray progresses towards real-world operations, its potential applications and impact on naval warfare will likely continue to be a topic of significant interest and discussion within defense circles and the public domain. Credit: New York Post 2024-06-26 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

The United States Supreme Court has agreed to hear a significant case challenging a Tennessee law that bans hormone therapy and puberty blockers for children under 18. This case marks the first occasion for the current nine justices to address the issue of transgender medical treatments. Three transgender teenagers from Tennessee, their parents, and a doctor who provides transgender medications are the plaintiffs in this case. They argue that the 2023 Tennessee law violates the U.S. Constitution's guarantee of equal protection under the law, asserting that it discriminates on the basis of sex. The plaintiffs are supported by the Biden administration and several major medical groups, who argue that the law prevents transgender individuals from accessing necessary drugs and therapies that are available to other adolescents with medical needs. Additionally, they contend that the ban infringes on parental rights to obtain necessary care for their children. U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, representing the Biden administration, emphasized the harm caused by the Tennessee law and similar statutes. In a brief filed last year, Prelogar stated that these laws "inflict profound harm on transgender adolescents and their families" by denying "appropriate and necessary" treatment for a serious medical condition. She called on the Supreme Court to resolve the uncertainty surrounding the legality of transgender medical bans. On the other side, lawyers for the state of Tennessee argue that the law reflects the will of the state's elected lawmakers and addresses a pressing public concern. According to their brief, Tennessee acted to ensure that minors do not receive these treatments until they can fully understand the lifelong consequences or until the science develops to the point where the state might reconsider their efficacy. This case, United States v. Skrmetti, comes in the wake of a previous Supreme Court decision that upheld an Idaho ban on transgender medical treatments for children, although the court did not express an opinion on the constitutionality of the statute. Additionally, in 2020, a six-justice majority of the court ruled that federal law prohibits discrimination against transgender employees. However, the composition of the court has changed since then, with Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg being replaced by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, a more conservative appointee of former President Donald Trump. The Supreme Court is expected to hear oral arguments in the autumn and issue a decision sometime next year. This case could have far-reaching implications for the legal landscape surrounding transgender rights and medical treatments in the United States, particularly given that 25 states have enacted similar laws, some of which are currently under legal challenge. Credit: BBC 2024-06-26 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

"Before letting her leave, they made her swear on Allah not to say anything," her mother said. The 12-year-old girl who was gang-raped in an antisemitic incident in France was asked to convert to Islam by her attackers, her parents told the French media outlet Le Parisien. "Before letting her leave, they made her swear on Allah not to say anything, and that she should not tell anyone, neither her parents nor the police," her mother said in the interview. The girl had reported to the police last week that she had been gang raped by three teenagers aged between 12-14 in what has been characterized as an antisemitic crime, according to Le Parisien. The girl's father described the impact the attack has had on his daughter. The "shock caused her to have flashbacks at night. She has difficulty falling asleep and wakes up at night. It's a pretty painful daily life," he said to Le Parisien. "Her attackers stole her childhood." The father has no doubt that this is an antisemitic attack and linked it to the "importation of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict into France." The victim's mother said that one of her daughter's attackers told her, "I know you're not Muslim... So, what religion are you?" The mother added that when the attacker learned that her daughter was Jewish, he deduced that she must be pro-Israel and anti-Palestinian. Prior harassment of the victim - This is not the first antisemitic attack that her daughter experienced in the wake of the Israel-Hamas war, added the mother. "After October 7, our daughter suffered harassment at her school and was ostracized because of her religion. It started during the month of November with Nazi salutes, swastikas on tables at school, and jokes about the Holocaust. She lost several Muslim friends this way without it leading to physical violence," she told LeParisien. The crime occurred in the Parisian suburb of Courbevoie. Related Topic: Teens Accused of Raping 12 Year Old Jewish Girl Arrested in France Credit: J.P. 2024-06-26 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Hunter Biden, the son of President Joe Biden, is seeking a new trial in his federal gun case following his conviction two weeks ago. The conviction was based on charges that he lied about his drug use when purchasing a firearm in 2018. His legal team has now filed a motion citing a procedural technicality rather than challenging the merits of the case itself. Hunter Biden, 54, became the first child of a sitting US president to be criminally convicted when a jury found him guilty on June 11. During the seven-day trial, prosecutors presented witness testimonies, including from Biden’s family members, alongside his text messages and memoir, to argue that he was using crack cocaine at the time he bought the gun. Biden's defense argued that he was in recovery during the purchase and did not consider himself an addict. Despite their efforts, the jury was convinced of his guilt. His lawyers immediately vowed to challenge the conviction, leading to the current motion for a new trial. Biden's legal team's latest move focuses on a procedural technicality. According to his primary attorney, Abbe Lowell, the trial began without a "mandate" from the appeals court. A mandate is a formal document that an appellate court uses to notify a lower court of its decision and authorization to proceed with the trial. In their filing on Monday, Lowell argued that the lack of this mandate invalidates the trial's basis. This motion comes after a previous attempt for a new trial was uploaded and then quickly deleted on June 17 at the request of Biden’s lawyers. In May, a federal appeals court had rejected two challenges to the case filed by Biden's legal team. The recent motion by Lowell contends that the absence of the mandate from the appeals court should result in the conviction being vacated. Experts suggest that while the chances of success on this procedural technicality might be slim, it represents a significant aspect of legal defense strategies. The procedural argument does not address the factual findings of the case but rather focuses on whether the trial was conducted according to proper judicial procedures. Biden was found guilty on all three criminal counts related to his purchase of a revolver at a Delaware gun store in October 2018. He kept the gun for approximately 11 days. While experts suggest that it is possible Biden could face prison time, it is unlikely he would receive the maximum sentence of 25 years. In addition to the gun case, Hunter Biden faces another legal battle in California, where he will stand trial in September for allegedly evading $1.4 million in taxes between 2016 and 2019. During this period, it is alleged that he spent millions on drugs, escorts, and luxury cars. The legal proceedings against Hunter Biden have broader implications, given his high-profile status as the president’s son. The case has garnered significant media attention and public interest, partly due to the intersection of legal, political, and personal dimensions involved. The attempts to secure a new trial based on procedural grounds also highlight the complexities and nuances of the legal system. Procedural defenses can play a critical role in ensuring that trials adhere to established judicial processes and standards. Credit: BBC 2024-06-26 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In a landmark legal move, over 100 victims and their families of the brutal October 7 Hamas attack on Israel have filed a lawsuit against the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA), demanding $1 billion in damages. The 167-page lawsuit, submitted in the Southern District of New York, accuses UNRWA of aiding and abetting the terror group by allowing its facilities to be used for weapons storage, permitting tunnels and command centers to be constructed under its sites, and indirectly funding Hamas through its payroll practices. Named as defendants in the lawsuit are current and former UNRWA leaders, including Philippe Lazzarini, the agency's head, as well as Pierre Krähenbühl, Filippo Grandi, Leni Stenseth, Sandra Mitchell, Margot Ellis, and Gréta Gunnarsdóttir. Krähenbühl is now the director-general of the International Committee of the Red Cross, and Grandi serves as the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. The plaintiffs allege that UNRWA's policy of paying employees in US dollars, which must be converted to Israeli shekels in Gaza, resulted in Hamas-controlled money changers taking a significant cut of these transactions. This practice, the lawsuit claims, funneled substantial funds into Hamas's coffers, enabling the purchase of weapons and other materials used in terror activities. "Hamas did not carry out these atrocities without assistance," the lawsuit asserts. "Defendants were warned repeatedly that their policies were directly providing assistance to Hamas," yet they continued these practices despite the warnings. The October 7 attack, in which 3,000 Hamas terrorists launched a cross-border assault resulting in the deaths of over 1,200 civilians in southern Israel and the abduction of 251 individuals, is described in the lawsuit as a foreseeable consequence of UNRWA's actions. One of the prominent plaintiffs, Ditza Heiman, who was abducted by Hamas on October 7 and later released in a prisoner exchange, reported that her captor was a teacher in an UNRWA school and that she was fed UNRWA-issued food rations during her captivity. "The fact that Hamas ruled Gaza was not an excuse for UNRWA to hire and finance terrorists, but it should have ensured that UNRWA took additional precautions," Heiman told Ynet. Other plaintiffs include Gadi and Reuma Kedem, who lost their daughter Tamar, son-in-law Yonatan, and three grandchildren—Shahar, Arbel, and Omer—in the attack on their home in Kibbutz Nir Oz. Yonatan's mother, Carol, was also killed. "There is no pain in the world that compares to burying your children and grandchildren who were murdered and strangled in their own home," Gadi Kedem said. He emphasized the need to hold UNRWA accountable for its role in empowering Hamas. "UNRWA strengthened Hamas and transferred funds and financed the murders, while being a full partner in the growth of Hamas terrorists." The lawsuit also points to the use of Hamas-approved textbooks in UNRWA schools, which allegedly indoctrinate children with ideologies of hatred and genocide, thus serving as a recruitment tool for the terror group. The plaintiffs stress that their legal action is not intended to serve as a platform for political grievances but is a pursuit of monetary compensation for their injuries based on traditional tort principles. UNRWA has not responded to requests for comment from various media outlets, including the UK’s Jewish Chronicle and Fox News, which first reported on the lawsuit. The agency's Director Lazzarini, meanwhile, has recently called for resistance against Israeli efforts to have UNRWA disbanded, arguing that such actions undermine the multilateral system supported by the majority of UN member states. The controversy surrounding UNRWA's operations is not new. Israel has long criticized the agency for allegedly turning a blind eye to Hamas activities and has accused it of employing individuals affiliated with Hamas and other terror groups. In February, Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant claimed that a significant number of UNRWA employees in Gaza were linked to Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad, with some taking active roles in the October 7 massacre. As the lawsuit progresses, it could have profound implications for UNRWA and its future operations, potentially reshaping the international community's approach to aid and governance in conflict zones. The legal battle underscores the complex interplay between humanitarian assistance and security, highlighting the dire need for stringent oversight and accountability in regions plagued by terrorism. Credit: TOI 2024-06-26 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

The BBC has been criticized for allegedly failing to disclose the affiliations of certain Palestinian journalists killed by Israel, who were reported to have ties to Hamas. Media campaigners have highlighted that some of the individuals described as journalists in the BBC's reports since the beginning of Israel's response to the October 7 attacks were militants who supported or worked for Hamas. The Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting and Analysis (Camera), an organization advocating for accurate reporting on Israel, claims that 55 out of 69 individuals listed as journalists by BBC Arabic had either expressed support for the killing of Israelis or worked for media outlets that did. This includes Mohammad Jarghoun and Assaad Shamlakh, who were eulogized on social media as part of the "resistance" and "jihad fighters," and Mustafa el-Sawaf, who was a member of Hamas’s political leadership for nearly 20 years. Additionally, Israel's Meir Amit Intelligence and Terrorism Information Centre reported that more than half of the journalists the Hamas media office claimed were killed in Gaza were affiliated with terrorist organizations, including 44 from Hamas and 19 from the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ). These revelations come in the wake of a recent incident where three Israeli hostages were found in the home of Abdallah al-Jamal, a Palestinian journalist, and his father, a doctor, during a raid by Israeli troops. The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) labeled al-Jamal a "Hamas terrorist," alleging he detained the hostages in his family home. Al-Jamal, who contributed to The Palestine Chronicle and Al Jazeera, was killed along with his father and wife during the rescue operation. Camera has criticized the BBC for allegedly elevating these individuals due to their "journalistic work" without acknowledging their affiliations with militant groups. They argue that this omission compromises the integrity of journalism and misleads audiences about the true nature of these individuals' roles. The BBC has responded to these allegations, stating that their reports covered the deaths of journalists regardless of their media outlets' political affiliations, emphasizing that such reporting is legitimate despite any connections between the journalists and proscribed groups. The BBC maintains that their intention was to record the loss of life among journalists, not to endorse or comment on their political views. The Telegraph disclosed last month that the corporation’s head office had been forced to correct BBC Arabic’s coverage of the Gaza conflict every other day on average during the first five months of the war. This issue has sparked ongoing debate about the role and impartiality of journalists in conflict zones, particularly those working for media organizations with known political biases. The BBC's Arabic service has faced repeated scrutiny for its coverage of the Gaza conflict, with accusations of bias and numerous corrections being issued during the war. Despite the criticisms, the BBC asserts that it remains committed to impartial reporting, even as it acknowledges the complex affiliations of journalists in the region. Related Topics: Al Jazeera’s Terrorist Ties and the Controversy Over Its Operations Al Jazeera journalist reportedly moonlights as Hamas commander claims IDF Israeli Forces Rescue Hostages, Held By Al Jazeera & Palestine Chronicle Journalist Exposing What Others Prefer to Hide The Dismal State of Hamas Propoganda by Media Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-06-26 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In an unexpected twist, the Communist Party of Britain found itself in the spotlight following an endorsement from J.K. Rowling, who has gained notoriety for her controversial views on transgender issues. Rowling, widely known for her Harry Potter series, has recently become equally recognized for her outspoken stance against trans women. The drama began when Rowling urged her social media followers to support Communist candidates, following a tweet from the anti-trans feminist group For Women Scotland. The group had claimed that a spokesperson for the Communist Party had voiced support for recognizing the nature of biological sex. This endorsement was a surprising turn for many, given Rowling's contentious history with transgender rights. In response to the endorsement, the Communist Party of Britain released a statement on its official X account, seeking to clarify its position. The party reaffirmed its unwavering support for transgender people's rights, stating that it supports the right of trans individuals to medically transition and access healthcare. Furthermore, the party emphasized the right of transgender people to live equal, full, and meaningful lives socially, economically, and politically. The statement underscored the belief that true liberation for transgender people could only be achieved under socialism. Rowling's endorsement, which is likely to be rescinded given the party's clear stance on transgender rights, followed her op-ed published in The Times of London. In the piece, Rowling expressed her disillusionment with the Labour Party due to its support for trans rights. A longtime Labour supporter, she lamented that she would "struggle to vote" for Labour in the upcoming elections, accusing the party of abandoning women. This episode highlights the deepening divisions in the U.K. over transgender rights and the recognition of biological sex. Political and social groups continue to navigate this contentious issue, often finding themselves at odds. The Communist Party of Britain's reaffirmation of its support for transgender rights is a significant stance, especially in the context of the controversy surrounding Rowling's endorsement. The controversy underscores the complexity of the ongoing debate on transgender rights in the U.K. Rowling's unexpected endorsement of the Communist Party brought attention to the nuanced positions within the political landscape. The party's clear reaffirmation of its support for transgender rights, despite the potentially detrimental endorsement, marks a significant moment in this ongoing discourse. As the political landscape continues to evolve, the debate over transgender rights and recognition of biological sex remains a contentious and polarizing issue. The Communist Party of Britain's stance reflects a broader commitment to equality and social justice, even as it navigates the complexities of modern political endorsements. This incident serves as a reminder of the ongoing struggle for transgender rights and the importance of clear and unwavering support from political entities. Credit: Daily Beast 2024-06-26 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

An inflamatory troll post has been removed: @Neeranam Topic update:

The International Criminal Court (ICC) has issued arrest warrants for former Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu and Chief of the General Staff Valery Gerasimov, accusing them of international crimes, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. The charges specifically relate to directing attacks on civilian objects and causing excessive harm to civilians or civilian infrastructure. The ICC’s decision, announced on Tuesday, has not yet elicited a response from Russian authorities. However, Ukrainian officials have expressed approval of the move. Ukraine’s human rights ombudsman, Dmytro Lubinets, hailed the ICC's decision as a significant step towards justice, asserting that "sooner or later, a just punishment will overtake every war criminal." Andriy Yermak, the head of Ukraine’s presidential office, emphasized that Shoigu and Gerasimov are being held "individually responsible," adding, "This is an important decision. Everyone will be held accountable for evil." The alleged crimes pertain to numerous strikes on electric power plants and substations across Ukraine, carried out by Russia between October 2022 and at least March 2023. The panel of three judges who issued the arrest warrants concluded that Shoigu and Gerasimov ordered strikes on civilian objects, actions that constitute war crimes under international humanitarian law. The judges noted that while some targets might have been relevant to Russia's military campaign, the harm to civilians was excessive relative to any military advantage. These warrants add to the ICC's previous actions against Russian officials, bringing the total number of top Russian figures wanted for war crimes to four. Earlier, the ICC issued arrest warrants for President Vladimir Putin and Russian official Maria Lvova-Belova, accusing them of orchestrating the deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia. The ICC's move marks a significant development in the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, underscoring the international community’s effort to hold individuals accountable for wartime actions that violate humanitarian laws. The warrants against Shoigu and Gerasimov highlight the ICC's commitment to addressing alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity amid the devastating impact of the conflict on civilians in Ukraine. Credit: CNN 2024-06-25 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

A post making an inflamatory comparison of Israel to Hitlers Germany has been removed.

Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, has been released from a British prison following a plea deal with US authorities that concludes his long-running legal saga. Assange, 52, faced charges of conspiracy to obtain and disclose national defense information due to his role in releasing classified documents related to the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. For years, US officials have contended that the WikiLeaks disclosures endangered lives by revealing sensitive military operations and intelligence. Despite these accusations, Assange's case has been fraught with controversy, with many supporters arguing that his prosecution was politically motivated. Assange spent the last five years incarcerated in the UK, battling extradition to the United States. His release comes after he agreed to plead guilty to a criminal charge, a decision that will see him avoid further time in US custody. According to CBS, Assange will receive credit for the time he has already spent in a UK prison. The Journey to Release Assange left Belmarsh prison on Monday after 1,901 days in detention. A statement from WikiLeaks confirmed that he was released at Stansted Airport, from where he boarded a plane back to Australia. This marks a significant turn in a case that has kept Assange under intense legal and public scrutiny for over a decade. Video footage shared by WikiLeaks shows Assange, casually dressed in jeans and a blue shirt, being driven to the airport before his departure. Although the BBC has not independently verified this footage, the scenes depict a pivotal moment for Assange and his supporters. Stella Assange, his wife, expressed her gratitude on social media, thanking the numerous supporters who have campaigned tirelessly for his release. "We have mobilized for years to make this come true," she tweeted. Legal and Political Implications The plea deal is set to be finalized in a court in the Northern Mariana Islands on June 26. This remote US commonwealth in the Pacific is considerably closer to Australia compared to US federal courts in Hawaii or the mainland United States. This unusual venue for the finalization of the deal underscores the complex and often unconventional nature of Assange's legal battles. Australia's government, through a spokesperson quoted by Agence France-Presse, expressed relief over the resolution, stating that the case had "dragged on for too long." However, Assange's attorney, Richard Miller, declined to comment, and the BBC has yet to receive a response from Assange's US-based lawyer. US President Joe Biden had earlier indicated that he was considering a request from Australia to drop the prosecution against Assange. In April, the UK High Court allowed Assange to challenge his extradition, offering him an opportunity to contest the US government's assurances regarding his trial and the protection of his free speech rights. A Decade of Controversy The US initially sought to prosecute Assange on 18 counts, primarily under the Espionage Act, for his role in publishing confidential military records and diplomatic messages. WikiLeaks, founded by Assange in 2006, is known for releasing over 10 million documents, described by the US government as "one of the largest compromises of classified information in the history of the United States." One of the most infamous releases by WikiLeaks was a 2010 video showing a US military helicopter attack in Baghdad that killed more than a dozen Iraqi civilians, including two Reuters news reporters. This and other disclosures significantly impacted public perception of US military operations and intelligence practices. Previous Legal Battles Assange's collaboration with Chelsea Manning, a former US Army intelligence analyst, is among his most notable associations. Manning was sentenced to 35 years in prison for her role in leaking classified documents but had her sentence commuted by President Barack Obama in 2017. Assange also faced allegations of rape and sexual assault in Sweden, which he denied. These charges led him to seek asylum in Ecuador's London embassy, where he remained for seven years. Although Sweden eventually dropped the case in 2019, citing the elapsed time since the original complaint, UK authorities arrested Assange for failing to surrender for extradition to Sweden. Health and Public Appearances Throughout his legal troubles, Assange's health has reportedly suffered. He experienced a minor stroke while in prison in 2021, and his prolonged confinement has taken a toll on his physical and mental well-being. Despite his high-profile status, Assange has been rarely seen in public, maintaining a relatively low profile during his incarceration. Moving Forward Assange's release and the conclusion of his legal battles mark a new chapter for WikiLeaks and its controversial founder. As he returns to Australia, the implications of his plea deal and the future of his activism remain subjects of intense speculation and debate. The resolution of his case may bring some closure to the families affected by the Sandy Hook massacre and others impacted by WikiLeaks' disclosures, but it also leaves many questions about press freedom, government transparency, and the balance between national security and the public's right to know. Credit: BBC 2024-06-25 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Infowars, the notorious media outlet operated by conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, is facing an imminent shutdown and sale, as revealed in an emergency court filing by a bankruptcy court-appointed trustee on Sunday. This move marks the potential end of a far-right platform widely known for spreading misinformation and controversial conspiracy theories. Earlier this month, a bankruptcy judge ruled that Jones’ personal assets would be liquidated to help pay off nearly $1.5 billion owed to the families of the Sandy Hook massacre victims. This ruling came as part of the aftermath of Jones’ false claims about the 2012 school shooting, which had devastating impacts on the affected families. However, at that time, the judge decided against liquidating Jones’ media company, Free Speech Systems (FSS), the parent company of Infowars. The judge's decision was partly based on the anticipated costs and lengthy process involved in liquidating the company. With the bankruptcy case against FSS dismissed, the Sandy Hook families gained the ability to pursue Jones’ assets, including Infowars, through state court proceedings. As Jones remains the owner of FSS, a court-appointed trustee was assigned to manage the company's affairs. Since his appointment, the trustee has been preparing to shut down FSS and liquidate its inventory. However, this plan hit a snag when one of the Sandy Hook victim’s parents filed a motion in a Texas District Court seeking custody of all FSS assets, including Infowars. This move prompted the trustee to request an emergency stay from the bankruptcy judge to allow an orderly wind-down and sale of Infowars. Christopher Mattei, an attorney representing the Sandy Hook families from Connecticut who supported the liquidation of the company, expressed disappointment over the latest development. “This is precisely the unfortunate situation that the Connecticut families hoped to avoid when we argued that the Free Speech Systems/InfoWars case should have remained with the bankruptcy court rather than being dismissed,” Mattei stated. He emphasized that the families had consistently aimed for a fair and orderly resolution and were grateful that the Chapter 7 Trustee had filed a motion advocating for an equitable distribution of FSS assets. Jones, who had previously expressed relief over the judge's decision not to liquidate Infowars’ parent company, acknowledged that Infowars might continue broadcasting for only a few more months. Speaking outside the courthouse following the dismissal of his company’s liquidation, Jones said, “I’m going to try to move forward and maximize the amount of money we can make at Infowars to then have a wind-down.” The unfolding events mark a significant turn in the long-standing legal battle surrounding Alex Jones and his media empire. The planned shutdown and sale of Infowars could bring a definitive end to one of the most contentious and controversial platforms in contemporary media, closing a chapter that has seen widespread dissemination of falsehoods and the consequent suffering of many, particularly the Sandy Hook families. Credit: CNN 2024-06-25 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

The UK government is contemplating retaliatory measures against Russian hackers following the theft of 300 million patient records from the NHS. The National Crime Agency (NCA) is considering action against the Qilin ransomware gang, which recently released a vast amount of sensitive NHS data after a cyber-attack on June 3. This data includes results of blood tests for HIV and cancer, and the theft has significantly disrupted services at hospitals and GP practices in south-east London. The National Crime Agency (NCA) and the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) are collaborating to explore options for mitigating the damage, including potentially removing the stolen data from public access. However, efforts to reclaim or take down the data may be complicated if the Qilin gang has made copies and is able to repost the information elsewhere. The attack has heavily impacted King's College Hospital and Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital Trusts, resulting in the cancellation of over 1,100 planned operations and the postponement of more than 2,100 outpatient appointments. The hospitals and GP practices affected are still operating at reduced capacity for blood tests due to being locked out of their own IT systems by the hackers. The government's consideration of retaliatory measures follows a precedent set earlier this year when the NCA, in cooperation with international partners, disrupted the LockBit ransomware group's operations. The NCA seized LockBit's "command and control" apparatus and infrastructure, marking a significant success in combating ransomware gangs operating from Russia or former Soviet states. The theft and subsequent publication of NHS data have raised significant concerns about patient privacy and potential further criminal exploitation. NHS England has set up an incident helpline to assist anxious patients and has advised vigilance against any suspicious communications claiming to have their data. The NCA and NCSC are working to verify the extent of the data published by Qilin, a process that is expected to take weeks due to the complexity of the files. Additionally, the stolen data is believed to include records from multiple private healthcare providers, further broadening the potential impact of the breach. The NHS is working to increase its capacity for blood tests and has managed to restore some level of service, but significant limitations remain. As the UK government weighs its options, the broader cybersecurity community, including experts like Tim Mitchell from Secureworks, note that the public posting of the data likely signals the end of ransom negotiations, suggesting that Qilin's demands were not met. Synnovis, the joint venture targeted in the attack, has not confirmed whether it engaged in any negotiations with the hackers. Credit: The Guardian 2024-06-25 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Los Angeles witnessed a violent confrontation outside the Adas Torah synagogue on Sunday morning as anti-Israel protesters clashed with supporters of Israel. The incident, which unfolded on Pico Boulevard, has sparked outrage and concerns about rising antisemitism and public safety in the city. The violence erupted before noon when two groups—one supporting Israel and the other protesting against it—converged in front of the synagogue. Video footage from the scene captured chaotic moments where individuals from both sides engaged in physical altercations. Many protesters wore keffiyehs and masks, while those supporting Israel were draped in Israeli flags. In one particularly distressing video, a woman can be seen lying in the fetal position on the ground as others tried to break up the crowd. Police officers in riot gear quickly surrounded the perimeter, but it remains unclear whether any arrests were made or the extent of the injuries sustained during the clashes. Aerial footage showed the heavy police presence, underscoring the severity of the situation. A man holding a Palestinian flag was seen physically fighting with a visibly Jewish man in another video, further highlighting the intense confrontations. Accusations flew from both sides about who initiated the violence. Anti-Israel activist groups and Jewish community members shared videos on social media, each blaming the other for the escalation. Jewish community members posted videos showing Jews being beaten on the ground by members of the anti-Israel mob. Journalist Daniel Greenfield, present at the rally, reported multiple instances of Jewish community members being sprayed with bear mace and pepper spray without any police intervention. He noted that some protesters appeared prepared for violence, wearing ski goggles as protection. Greenfield also recounted being threatened by a man in a keffiyeh who allegedly said, "Billions will come to kill you." In response to the violence, LA Mayor Karen Bass condemned the actions and promised additional police patrols in the heavily Jewish neighborhood. She stated, "Today’s violence in the Pico-Robertson neighborhood was abhorrent, and blocking access to a place of worship is unacceptable. I want to be clear that Los Angeles will not be a harbor for antisemitism and violence. Those responsible for either will be found and held accountable." Journalist Cam Higby, who was hit by bear mace, shared his experience on social media, thanking local rabbis, off-duty emergency medical technicians, and community members who assisted him despite not knowing his identity or beliefs. He expressed his shock at the violence, saying, "People who aren’t antisemitic don’t show up to a synagogue in a Jewish neighborhood with bear spray and other weapons to fight people. Reviewing footage of Jews being pushed down and beaten bloody in the street just outside of a synagogue in a Jewish neighborhood—all I can think of is when I learned about the night of broken glass." Activist and politician Sam Yerbi described the situation as "violent anti-Israel activists dispersed into Jewish neighborhoods hunting Jews and causing more destruction and vandalism." Yerbi shared a video on Instagram showing a man in a keffiyeh threatening residents with two bludgeons retrieved from his car. He also posted footage of community members intervening to stop vandalism of a kosher restaurant. Criticism of the LAPD and Mayor Bass was widespread. Greenfield accused the LAPD of allowing anti-Israel activists to occupy both sides of the synagogue, providing only a small access lane for community members. He claimed that when police in riot gear arrived, they did not separate the two sides for an hour. Political consultant Noah Pollak said on social media that he and his family were denied access to the synagogue because the LAPD had formed a cordon to "keep Jews out and Hamas supporters in." Yerbi alleged that elected officials had told the LAPD to stand down and not intervene, an accusation Pollak echoed, accusing officials of helping "the Democratic Party street animals do their thuggery." Security at the site was provided by LA Shmira Public Safety and Magen Am volunteers, who coordinated with the LAPD, the Shul Guard Network, the LA Jewish Federation's Community Security Initiative, and other Jewish public safety groups. Despite these efforts, Greenfield criticized the Jewish community leadership for failing to organize effectively. He stated, "Some community leaders urged people not to go to avoid giving the terrorist supporters publicity, others came but in an unorganized fashion. While leftists are able to throw together antisemitic rallies at short notice, the Jewish community has failed to prep and the result is that terrorist supporters were able to freely operate in the heart of the Pico-Robertson Jewish community and to intimidate a synagogue." The delayed response from California politicians further fueled the community's frustration. It took hours before statements were issued condemning the violence. California Governor Gavin Newsom eventually said on social media, "The violent clashes outside the Adas Torah synagogue in Los Angeles are appalling. There is no excuse for targeting a house of worship. Such antisemitic hatred has no place in California." Congressman Ted Lieu also condemned the targeting of the synagogue, stating, "I strongly condemn the Pro-Palestinian demonstrators who engaged in anti-Semitism by targeting Adas Torah Synagogue and/or its congregants." Councilwoman Katy Yaroslavsky expressed deep concern over the incident, noting that her upcoming meeting with Mayor Bass, the Jewish Federation, and the LAPD would explore why the situation had escalated. "The antisemitic violence that broke out today in Pico Robertson would have been completely unacceptable anywhere in Los Angeles, but that it was planned and carried out in front of a synagogue in the heart of LA’s Jewish community should be deeply concerning to us all," Yaroslavsky said. The protests were organized by groups like Code Pink and the Party for Socialism and Liberation, allegedly in response to the sale of "stolen Palestinian land." Advertisement for the real estate event did not specify the areas being sold. PYM LA declared, "Racist settler expansionists are not welcome in Los Angeles! This blatant example of land theft is operating in our own backyard. The Nakba is ongoing and must be confronted!" A Code Pink video showed protesters chanting for intifada as the "only solution." Anti-Israel activists claimed they had peacefully protested and were attacked by pro-Israel counter-protesters and police. Code Pink stated on Instagram, "Madness, chaos, agitation, provoking and the use of physical force by the Zionist community and LAPD. While our comrades were physically assaulted, pepper/bear sprayed and attacked as they walked back to their cars, LAPD did nothing to keep us safe but rather pushed and used their combat toys to add to injury." The Party for Socialism and Liberation Los Angeles posted videos showing activists being pushed by police and grappling with counter-protesters. In one clash, protesters and counter-protesters fought over an Israeli flag. One Muslim woman was spat on and pelted with an egg when she refused to let go of the flag, and the fight was broken up when an activist sprayed the group with mace. Another video published by community group Sot El Zaytoon showed a pro-Israel man body-checking a Muslim woman, who was then punched to the ground by an anti-Israel activist. A similar protest organized by Code Pink had taken place outside the Shaarey Zedek congregation on Thursday, highlighting the ongoing tension and conflict in the area. The International March of the Living (IML), a Holocaust education organization, responded to the clashes and other recent antisemitic incidents worldwide. In a statement, IML said, "The attack on the 'Adas Torah' synagogue in Los Angeles and the targeting of Jews there, as well as the attacks on synagogues in Russia, the shocking rape of a Jewish girl in France last week, and the daily threats to Jews worldwide, all lead to one grim conclusion: Jewish blood is cheap. These attacks are all attempts to intimidate and push Jews out of the public sphere—a phenomenon we know all too well from history. We call on the authorities in countries across the world to come to their senses quickly because Jewish blood is being shed with impunity." Credit: JP | X 2024-06-25 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In a provocative guest essay published by The New York Times, Jeffrey A. Sonnenfeld, president of the Yale Chief Executive Leadership Institute, contended that many of former President Donald Trump's economic initiatives share more in common with communist principles espoused by Karl Marx than with the capitalist ideas of Adam Smith. This bold assertion has sparked significant discussion as Trump seeks a second term in the White House. Sonnenfeld's essay, titled "I Know What America's Leading C.E.O.s Really Think of Donald Trump," dismantles Trump's claims of widespread support from big business leaders. Sonnenfeld, who has acted as a private liaison between business and political leaders including Trump and President Joe Biden, asserted that many CEOs are deeply concerned about the implications of a second Trump presidency. "The MAGA [Make America Great Again] die-hard voices that have Mr. Trump's ear often share more in common with the far left than with the traditional Republican Party," Sonnenfeld wrote. He criticized Trump's economic policies, including proposed universal 10 percent tariffs on all imports, unorthodox monetary and fiscal policies, stripping the Federal Reserve Board of its independence, and potentially instituting yield curve control to force interest rates lower. "These Trump positions share more in common with Karl Marx than Adam Smith," Sonnenfeld argued, emphasizing that such policies would likely drive inflation higher. Sonnenfeld noted that during Trump's first term, he had more reasonable advisors like Jared Kushner, Dina Powell, and Steven Mnuchin who served as conduits to the business community. However, he lamented that these voices have been replaced by "MAGA extremists and junior varsity opportunists." In response to the controversy, Newsweek reached out to Trump's campaign for comment. Previously, Steven Cheung, communications director for the Trump presidential campaign, disputed similar characterizations, stating, "President Trump was warmly received by everyone in the room and was commended for his policy proposals on deregulation and tax cuts." Sonnenfeld's essay comes at a time of heightened scrutiny of Trump's economic policies, particularly following a report from USA Today that highlighted the differences between Trump's and Biden's economic plans. Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody's Analytics, was quoted in the report saying, "Biden's policies are better for the economy." Despite this, public perception of Biden's economic policy remains low, with a Yahoo News/YouGov poll indicating only 33 percent approval of Biden's handling of the economy. Under Biden's administration, notable economic achievements include low unemployment rates, with April marking the 27th consecutive month of unemployment rates below 4 percent, the longest streak since the 1960s. Biden's policies have also focused on infrastructure investments, support for domestic chip making and electric vehicle production, and maintaining record corporate profits and robust financial markets. Conversely, Trump has floated various economic ideas, including an "all-tariff policy" that could eliminate income tax and a 10 percent tariff on all imports, with potentially higher tariffs on Chinese imports. At a rally in New Jersey, Trump promised tax cuts for all Americans and proposed not taxing workers who earn part of their income through tips if he were to win the White House. As Trump and Biden prepare to face off in a debate on June 27, the stark differences in their economic policies will undoubtedly be a focal point. Trump's proposed policies, which some argue lean towards authoritarian economic control, will be juxtaposed against Biden's strategies aimed at fostering economic growth and stability. Sonnenfeld's critique adds a layer of complexity to the political discourse surrounding the upcoming election, challenging the perception of Trump's alignment with traditional capitalist principles and raising questions about the broader implications of his economic vision. Credit: NewsWeek 2024-06-25 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Tyler Cherry, newly appointed Associate Communications Director in the Biden administration, has found himself at the center of a political controversy, compelled to apologize for controversial tweets from his past. The situation erupted after Politico reported Cherry's promotion from his former role as Communications Director at the Interior Department. Conservatives quickly seized on the issue, circulating screenshots of old tweets from Cherry's social media that date back to 2014 and 2015. These tweets contained strong criticisms of law enforcement, calls for the abolition of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and support for anti-Israel organizations. Cherry responded to the controversy by addressing it on X (formerly known as Twitter) on Sunday. "Past social media posts from when I was younger do not reflect my current views. Period," Cherry stated, emphasizing his commitment to the Biden administration's agenda, particularly in climate and environmental policies. In an effort to manage the backlash, Cherry deleted any posts on his account predating April 2022, making it impossible to independently verify the screenshots that were circulating online. However, the handle @TylerACherry, seen in the screenshots, matches Cherry's current X account name. One purported tweet from 2015, posted during the unrest following Freddie Gray's death in police custody, allegedly read, "Praying for #Baltimore, but praying even harder for an end to a capitalistic police state motivated by explicit and implicit racial biases." Another from the same period supposedly stated, "Time to recall that the modern day police system is a direct evolution of slave patrols and lynch mobs." In tweets from 2014, Cherry allegedly expressed support for Palestine during the Gaza War, writing, "Cheersing in bars to ending the occupation of Palestine — no shame and f— your glares #ISupportGaza #FreePalestine." Cherry's professional history includes three years at the Interior Department under Secretary Deb Haaland before his recent promotion to the White House. He is also recognized for his LGBTQ rights activism and involvement in Washington, D.C.'s creative community. Despite the controversy, the Biden administration has stood by Cherry. White House senior deputy press secretary Andrew Bates told Fox News Digital, "We're very proud to have Tyler on the team." This stance aligns with the administration's previous responses to attacks on Cherry, who faced criticism for his appearance and professional demeanor last October. Conservative commentators have questioned Cherry's fitness for his role and criticized the Biden administration's hiring decision. Some argue that Cherry's past posts reflect a broader ideological stance within the administration, while others view them as youthful indiscretions that should not overshadow his professional qualifications. X user Ashley St. Clair, for instance, responded to Cherry's apology by asking, "That's really awesome to hear Tyler— could you elaborate on what views are different and which one of these past posts do not reflect your current views?" and posted a screenshot of the alleged past tweets. Another user, Corey A. DeAngelis, inquired, "Why did you just delete this tweet" shortly after Cherry posted his apology. The incident highlights the challenges faced by public figures in the age of social media, where past comments can resurface and become points of contention. For now, the Biden administration remains supportive of Cherry, signaling confidence in his ability to fulfill his duties despite the controversy. Credit: NewsWeek 2024-06-25 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant is headed to Washington, D.C., as the threat of conflict with Hezbollah intensifies. Hezbollah’s leader, Hasan Nasrallah, recently issued a dire warning, stating that if war breaks out with Lebanon, Hezbollah will attack significant Israeli landmarks without restraint. This warning came through a video that highlighted potential targets, including critical infrastructure such as airports, power plants, and nuclear research centers. Gallant's visit to the U.S. capital, set to begin Sunday, aims to discuss these escalating tensions with key American officials, including Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and Secretary of State Antony Blinken. The agenda will cover the situation in Gaza, the evolving threats from Lebanon, and efforts to secure the return of Israeli hostages held by Hamas. Before departing, Gallant underscored the importance of U.S.-Israel relations, especially during these turbulent times. “Our ties are crucial and perhaps more important than ever, at this time,” he stated. The recent aggressive posture from Hezbollah, including the release of a video targeting Israeli sites, has heightened fears of a broader conflict. This video included excerpts from Nasrallah's speech, where he declared that the resistance would fight "without restraints, without rules, without limits" if war were imposed on Lebanon. The video specified targets such as Ben Gurion Airport, power plants in Ashkelon and Hadera, the nuclear facility in Dimona, the Leviathan gas field, and the port city of Ashdod. This trip to Washington comes on the heels of a dispute between Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the U.S. over the delay of weapons shipments to Israel. Netanyahu defended his remarks about the delay, emphasizing his responsibility to ensure that Israeli fighters are well-armed. Gallant’s visit also follows recent Israeli military operations in Rafah, Gaza, aimed at dismantling remaining Hamas battalions. However, Israel’s attention is now increasingly drawn to the northern front, where Hezbollah’s unexpected release of drone footage from an Israeli military base in Haifa has raised the stakes. Moreover, the actions of Israeli forces have sparked controversy in the West Bank. In Wadi Burqin, footage emerged showing a Palestinian man tied to the hood of an Israeli military vehicle. The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) confirmed the incident, acknowledging it as a violation of their standard procedures and stating that the man, injured in a firefight, was eventually transferred for medical treatment despite initial hindrance. Gallant's meetings in Washington will likely address these multifaceted threats and the broader strategic implications for Israel and its allies. His statement emphasized readiness for action in Gaza, Lebanon, and other areas as necessary, underscoring the critical nature of his discussions in the U.S. during this volatile period. Credit: Washington Post 2024-06-25 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

As the 2024 presidential election approaches, Vice President Kamala Harris emphasized the critical nature of reproductive health rights, asserting that "everything is at stake." The Biden campaign has intensified efforts to highlight the stark differences between Democratic President Joe Biden and Republican Donald Trump on this issue, particularly ahead of their upcoming debate. In preparation for Monday’s second anniversary of the Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision, which overturned the federal legal right to an abortion, the Biden campaign announced plans for over 50 events across battleground states and beyond. This decision, which marked a significant shift in reproductive rights, was made by a Supreme Court that included three conservative justices appointed during Trump’s presidency. Harris, in an interview with MSNBC alongside Kentucky abortion rights advocate Hadley Duvall, underscored the broader implications of losing such a fundamental freedom. "Every person of whatever gender should understand that, if such a fundamental freedom such as the right to make decisions about your own body can be taken, be aware of what other freedoms may be at stake," she stated. The Biden campaign is banking on the issue of abortion rights to mobilize voters in what is anticipated to be a closely contested general election. While Trump has taken credit for the Dobbs decision to appease his conservative base, he has not fully endorsed a national abortion ban, suggesting that the matter should be decided by individual states. In April, he explicitly stated that he would not sign a nationwide abortion ban if passed by Congress, and has avoided clarifying his stance on women's access to the abortion pill mifepristone. At a recent campaign event, Trump touted the Dobbs decision as a significant achievement but acknowledged the political risks of further pressing the issue. "Every voter has to go with your heart and do what’s right, but we also have to get elected," he said. As Biden began his private preparations for the upcoming debate at Camp David, Trump engaged in an informal preparation process at his Florida estate. Hadley Duvall, who has publicly shared her story of being raped by her stepfather and the subsequent impact of abortion restrictions, joined First Lady Jill Biden at a Pittsburgh campaign rally. Both criticized Trump for supporting the Dobbs decision, with Jill Biden asserting that Trump underestimates the resolve of women when their rights are threatened. "He thinks we can be ignored," she said. "He doesn’t know that when our bodies are on the line, when our daughters’ futures are at stake, we are immovable and we are unstoppable." Kentucky, Duvall's home state, has implemented a near-total abortion ban following the Dobbs decision, allowing abortions only to save the mother’s life, with no exceptions for rape or incest. In a recent Fox News interview, Trump described the varying state laws on abortion rights as "a beautiful thing to watch." Duvall responded, challenging this view by highlighting the harsh realities faced by young girls in such situations. "I would like to ask him: What is so beautiful about telling a 12-year-old girl that she must have the baby of her stepfather who raped her?" she questioned. To mark the anniversary of the Dobbs decision, Harris has scheduled campaign events in Arizona and Maryland, while her husband, Doug Emhoff, heads to Michigan. Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts will travel to Wisconsin on behalf of the Biden campaign, accompanied by Amanda Zurawski, a Texas woman who was initially denied an abortion despite her baby being non-viable, and only received medical intervention after developing life-threatening sepsis. Reflecting on the upcoming election, Duvall stressed the stakes for women of reproductive age, urging voters to prioritize reproductive rights regardless of past political affiliations. "If there is a woman who is in that reproductive age, then her life is at stake during this election," she said. "And it does not matter if you have never voted Democrat in your life. It’s get off your high horse, because women, we don’t get to choose a whole lot, and you at least can choose who you can vote for." Credit: US News 2024-06-25 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

House Democrat Stresses Differences with Biden, Cooperation with GOP in New Ad. In a competitive race for re-election, Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (D-Wash.) is emphasizing her policy differences with President Biden and highlighting her bipartisan efforts on border security in a new advertisement. This strategic move comes as vulnerable Democrats across the nation feel the necessity to distinguish their campaigns from the presidential administration amid challenging political climates. Rep. Gluesenkamp Perez’s ad, shared exclusively with Axios, underscores her commitment to "taking on the Biden administration and working with Republicans to secure the Southern border." This approach reflects a time-honored strategy where down-ballot candidates in difficult races distance themselves from the presidential administration to appeal to a broader electorate. The advertisement draws attention to a statement released earlier this month by Gluesenkamp Perez and other centrist Democrats. In it, they urge President Biden to extend his executive order aimed at reducing illegal border crossings. Additionally, the ad references a $66 billion foreign aid and border policy bill proposed in February by a bipartisan group of centrists, including Gluesenkamp Perez. This proposal served as an alternative to a standalone foreign aid bill that was ultimately passed. The ad campaign, which is set to begin airing on Monday, involves a significant investment of $500,000. Earlier this year, Democrats aimed to bolster their stance on border security by pushing for a bipartisan bill supported by Biden. However, this effort was thwarted by Republicans, spurred on by former President Trump. A spokesperson for Biden's campaign remarked, "The American people want solutions on the border, Donald Trump only wants chaos. He and his MAGA allies in Congress proudly killed the strongest bipartisan border bill in a generation—siding with fentanyl traffickers over the border patrol and the American people." Rep. Gluesenkamp Perez, who secured a surprising victory over hard-right opponent Joe Kent in 2022, now faces a tougher re-election battle. Her district, which Trump won by 4 percentage points in 2020, presents a formidable challenge with Trump back on the ballot. Furthermore, establishment-aligned Republican Leslie Lewallen is running to prevent Kent from once again becoming the GOP candidate. Concerns are growing among Democrats over Biden’s low approval ratings, fearing it might negatively impact the party’s candidates even in swing districts within blue states. This recent ad follows a broader trend where vulnerable House Democrats are distancing themselves from President Biden on various issues, including border policy, Israel, and electric vehicles. Rep. Colin Allred (D-Texas), in his Senate campaign, is running ads asserting he "stood up to Joe Biden on the border." Similarly, Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mont.), seeking re-election in a state that Trump won in 2020 and is likely to win again, has emphasized his disagreements with Biden on border issues and other policies. Credit: AXIOS 2024-06-25 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe