Social Media

Please remain on topic, it has already been established who are being held as hostages. They were taken on the 7th Oct. Latest developments and discussion of events in the Israel-Hamas War Comment on moderation additionaly removed

Posts contravening community standards have been removed. Along with unsubstantiated inflamatory claims.

Abigail Disney, heiress to the Disney family fortune, and other wealthy Democratic donors have declared they will cease funding the Democratic Party unless President Joe Biden withdraws from the presidential race. This decision follows Biden's poor performance in a recent debate against former President Donald Trump. Abigail Disney, granddaughter of Roy O. Disney, co-founder of The Walt Disney Company, expressed her frustration to CNBC, stating she would withhold donations until Biden steps down. Despite these calls, Biden has firmly stated he has no intention of leaving the race. Disney emphasized, “I intend to stop any contributions to the party unless and until they replace Biden at the top of the ticket. This is realism, not disrespect. Biden is a good man and has served his country admirably, but the stakes are far too high. If Biden does not step down the Democrats will lose. Of that I am absolutely certain. The consequences for the loss will be genuinely dire.” The Democratic Party has been in turmoil since Biden's debate performance, which has led to significant concern among party members and donors. Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Texas, has also called for Biden to drop out, suggesting that the debate performance demonstrated Biden's inability to effectively challenge Trump and close the polling gap. A New York Times/Siena College poll conducted after the debate showed Biden trailing Trump by six percentage points among likely voters. Longtime Democratic supporter Abigail Disney has a history of significant contributions to the party. She donated $50,000 to the Jane Fonda Climate political action committee in April, which has directed $35,000 to Democrats running for congressional seats. Additionally, Disney contributed $150,000 to Planned Parenthood Votes in 2014, which has spent over $400,000 supporting Democrats, including $26,000 for Biden this election cycle. Disney has advocated for Vice President Kamala Harris as a viable alternative to Biden, believing she has the potential to defeat Trump. She stated, “We have an excellent Vice President. If Democrats would tolerate any of her perceived shortcomings even one-tenth as much as they have tolerated Biden’s (and let’s not kid ourselves about where race and gender figure in that inequity) and if Democrats can find a way to stop quibbling and rally around her, we can win this election by a lot.” Gideon Stein, president of the Moriah Fund, has also decided to pause planned donations totaling $3.5 million until Biden steps down. Stein remarked, “Joe Biden has been a very effective president, but unless he steps aside my family and I are pausing on more than $3 million in planned donations to nonprofits and political organizations aligned with the presidential race, with the exception of some down-ballot work. Virtually every major donor I’ve talked to believes that we need a new candidate in order to defeat Donald Trump.” Karla Jurvetson, a prominent Democratic donor, has hinted in private discussions that she may also halt contributions until Biden steps down. Jurvetson, who has donated over $5 million to Democrats this cycle, including more than $200,000 to the Biden Victory Fund, has previously given over $30 million to Democrats in 2020. The pressure from these influential donors comes as the Democratic Party navigates internal conflicts and seeks to secure a candidate capable of defeating Trump in the upcoming election. Representatives for the Biden campaign have not responded to requests for comment. Credit: CNBC 2024-07-05 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Labour appears poised for a historic victory with a predicted majority of 170 seats, according to an exit poll conducted for the BBC, ITV, and Sky. If accurate, this outcome will see Sir Keir Starmer become prime minister with 410 Labour MPs, narrowly missing Tony Blair's 1997 record. The Conservatives are forecasted to experience their worst defeat, securing only 131 MPs, their lowest number in history. The Liberal Democrats are expected to come in third, with 61 MPs, while the Scottish National Party (SNP) is projected to see a significant reduction, retaining only 10 MPs. Reform UK is forecasted to gain 13 seats, and the Green Party of England and Wales is predicted to double its representation to two MPs. Plaid Cymru is expected to secure four seats, with other parties collectively obtaining 19 seats. This exit poll, managed by Sir John Curtice and a team of statisticians, is based on voter data from approximately 130 polling stations across England, Scotland, and Wales, excluding Northern Ireland. Historically, exit polls have been accurate within a range of 1.5 to 7.5 seats. A Labour landslide, as suggested by the exit poll, would mark a remarkable turnaround from the party's worst post-war election result in 2019, where the Conservatives, led by Boris Johnson, achieved an 80-seat majority. Although the Conservatives might avoid a complete wipeout predicted by some opinion polls, the projected loss of 241 MPs represents a devastating blow after 14 years in power. This result would usher in a Labour prime minister for the first time since 2010 and likely prompt a reevaluation of the Conservative Party's future direction, especially if Rishi Sunak steps down as leader. Labour's potential victory is seen as a validation of Sir Keir Starmer's efforts to reposition the party towards the center of British politics. Shadow Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson, who won the Houghton and Sunderland South constituency, echoed this sentiment in her victory speech, stating, "Tonight the British people have spoken, and if the exit poll this evening is again a guide to results across our country as it so often is, then after 14 years the British people have chosen change. They have chosen Labour and they have chosen the leadership of Keir Starmer. Today our country with its proud history has chosen a brighter future." In an early indication of the shifting political landscape, Reform UK candidates outperformed Conservative candidates in several North-East England constituencies, securing second place by a substantial margin. Reform UK leader Nigel Farage predicted a significant number of wins for his party, stating, "This, folks, is huge." The Liberal Democrats are also expected to make substantial gains at the expense of the Conservatives in southern England, where high-profile Tory figures, including Chancellor Jeremy Hunt and Defence Secretary Grant Shapps, appear vulnerable. Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey remarked, "It looks like this will be our best result for a generation." Despite maintaining a positive outlook throughout the campaign, Rishi Sunak faced numerous challenges, including a series of gaffes and a failure to significantly reduce Labour's lead in the polls. Conservative Work and Pensions Secretary Mel Stride described the situation as "a very difficult moment for the Conservative Party" and expressed sorrow over the projected losses of many colleagues' seats. The SNP, facing a challenging night, is predicted to lose 38 seats. Former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon acknowledged the difficulties, stating, "It was 'not a good night' for the SNP," and believed the exit poll would be "broadly right." Sunak's decision to call a summer election surprised many within his party. However, his campaign was marred by various missteps, including a rain-soaked announcement in Downing Street, an early departure from a D-Day celebration in Normandy to record a TV interview, and inconsistent messaging about a Labour "super majority." As results start to roll in during the early hours, the accuracy of the exit poll will be confirmed. Regardless, the predicted Labour landslide indicates a dramatic shift in the UK’s political landscape, potentially ushering in a new era under Keir Starmer’s leadership. Credit: BBC 2024-07-05 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has expressed his willingness to meet with former US President Donald Trump, urging him to disclose any plans he may have for ending the ongoing war in Ukraine. In a Bloomberg Television interview from Kyiv, Zelensky emphasized the need for clarity on future US support, particularly as Trump, a leading candidate in the upcoming US presidential election, has claimed he could resolve the conflict by the time of his potential inauguration in January. Zelensky voiced his concerns about the risks to Ukrainian independence and the delays in receiving weapons from Western allies. "If there are risks to Ukrainian independence, if we lose statehood – we want to be ready for this, we want to know," he stated. Addressing Trump's recent remarks during a televised debate, where Trump criticized the significant financial aid provided to Ukraine and asserted that Kyiv is "not winning the war," Zelensky was eager to understand the specifics of Trump's proposals. Reflecting on the current situation, Zelensky rejected the term "deadlock" to describe the conflict, instead calling it a "problematic situation." He noted that Ukrainian forces are in a better position now in terms of manpower and are awaiting the arrival of essential tools for a new counteroffensive. "A deadlock means there’s no way out. But a problem can be solved if one has the will and has the tools. We do have the will, and the tools – they haven’t arrived yet," he explained. As the war enters its third year, Zelensky highlighted the challenges posed by the delays in weapons deliveries, which have allowed Russia's military to exploit dwindling stockpiles of ammunition and make incremental gains. He praised the recent $61 billion assistance package approved by the US Congress but lamented the lengthy process of getting the equipment to the front lines. "This is the biggest tragedy of this war, that between the decision and real fact, we have a real long, long, long wait," Zelensky said. Zelensky also pointed to the potential role of China in resolving the conflict, given Russia's dependence on the Chinese market for exports. He suggested that cooperation between the US and China could be pivotal in ending the war. However, he dismissed calls for a cease-fire, such as those made by Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban during his visit to Kyiv. Zelensky argued that proponents of a cease-fire have not provided a viable plan for its implementation. "Nobody has an answer," he said. "I’m not accusing, I’m just explaining." While Zelensky refrained from commenting on President Joe Biden's performance in the recent debate, he emphasized the importance of each candidate's stance on Ukraine. He noted that strong, decisive steps from the US leader would be crucial in convincing the public and supporting Ukraine's efforts. Zelensky's readiness to meet with Trump underscores the urgency of securing clear and unwavering support from the US as Ukraine continues to defend its sovereignty against Russian aggression. Bloomberg Interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7NtDQOraknM Credit: Bloomberg 2024-07-05 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Newly released text messages have brought Columbia University into the spotlight, revealing a shocking lack of sensitivity and respect from several of its deans towards Jewish students. The messages, disclosed by the House Education Committee, show Associate Deans Josef Sorett, Susan Chang-Kim, Matthew Patashnick, and Cristen Kromm making dismissive and derisive remarks during a May 31 alumni event about Jewish life on campus. In one exchange, Matthew Patashnick, Associate Dean for Student and Family Support, commented, "Laying the case to expand physical space! They will have their own dorm soon." This prompted Susan Chang-Kim, Vice Dean and Chief Administrative Officer of Columbia College, to respond, "Comes from such a place of privilege." She added, “Hard to hear the woe is me, we need to huddle at the Kraft center Huh?? Trying to be open minded to understand but the doors are closing.” Cristen Kromm joined the conversation with, "Amazing what $$$$ can do," and later, "If only every identity community had these resources and support." The context for these remarks was a panel discussion featuring Columbia’s Kraft Center for Jewish Life executive director Brian Cohen, former Columbia Law School dean David Schizer, religious life dean Ian Rottenberg, and Rebecca Massel, a rising Columbia junior and journalist. The discussion was centered on the experiences and concerns of Jewish students on campus, particularly regarding antisemitism. The Washington Free Beacon first reported the text exchanges, highlighting one particularly egregious message where vomit emojis were used in reference to an op-ed about antisemitism by Columbia’s Campus Rabbi Yonah Hain. The publication also noted a disturbing response from Chang-Kim to a Holocaust survivor, Orly Mishan, who expressed fears about her daughter facing antisemitism on campus. Chang-Kim wrote, "I’m going to throw up," in reaction to Mishan's comments about student protesters supporting Hamas following the terror group’s massacre in Israel on October 7. Patashnick remarked, “His use of the word Hamas is interesting. Students generally weren’t protesting for Hamas.” These revelations come amidst broader tensions at Columbia University, where Jewish students have reported feeling marginalized and unsafe. The university has been a focal point for anti-Israel demonstrations, with incidents such as the occupation of Hamilton Hall by masked pro-Hamas rioters, who broke windows and displayed flags calling for "intifada." Despite the severity of these actions, many arrested protestors saw their charges dropped by Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg. Columbia President Minouche Shafik has also faced criticism for her failure to clearly condemn antisemitic slogans, such as “from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free,” during her testimony before Congress. In response to the text message scandal, Chang-Kim, Patashnick, and Kromm have been placed on leave. Josef Sorett, who also participated in the texts, is cooperating with the investigation but will continue to serve as Dean of the College, recusing himself from all matters related to the investigation. Sorett had previously issued a private apology to Columbia’s Board of Visitors, stating that the texts did not reflect the views of any individual or the team. House Education Chairwoman Virginia Foxx (R-NC) condemned the deans' behavior, stating, "Jewish students deserve better than to have harassment and threats against them dismissed as 'privilege,' and Jewish faculty members deserve better than to be mocked by their colleagues." She emphasized the need for accountability across Columbia's campus. A Columbia University official has reiterated the institution’s commitment to combatting antisemitism, pledging to take sustained, concrete action to ensure that Columbia is a safe and welcoming place for Jewish students and all community members. Credit: NYP 2024-07-05 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In a landmark legal battle that has ignited intense discussions on workplace diversity and discrimination, Emmy Award-winning CBS anchor Jeff Vaughn has filed a $5 million lawsuit against CBS and its parent company, Paramount Global. Vaughn, who dedicated eight years to a CBS-owned Los Angeles affiliate, claims that he was terminated due to a company policy that prioritizes diversity hires over white, heterosexual males. The lawsuit, filed in a California federal court on Monday, centers around Vaughn’s assertion that CBS’s aggressive pursuit of diversity led to his replacement by a younger, minority news anchor in 2022. Vaughn's complaint highlights CBS's goal to ensure that half of all writers be nonwhite by 2023 and an initiative requiring that half of all cast members on their reality shows be minorities. The complaint alleges, "CBS decided that there were too many white males at CBS, and it acted accordingly. It needed to solve its ‘white problem’ by firing successful white males." CBS has declined to comment on the lawsuit. This legal action is not the first of its kind for CBS. In March, a similar case was brought forward by a white, heterosexual male freelance writer for CBS's "SEAL Team" series, who accused the network of "blatant" discrimination. Earlier this year, an investigation by The New York Post revealed that CBS News president Ingrid Ciprian-Matthews had been accused by staffers of promoting minorities while unfairly sidelining white journalists. This sparked an internal human relations probe in 2021. Sources claimed the probe, which was “cut short,” concluded that Ciprian-Matthews was merely a “bad manager” with limited resources. According to Vaughn, he was informed by the general manager at CBS News Los Angeles that he would be replaced within six months, although no direct reason was provided for his removal. Vaughn, who has over 30 years of experience in broadcast journalism and has won four Emmys, noticed that he was gradually being excluded from several reporting and promotional events ahead of his firing. For instance, during CBS News’ 20th anniversary 9/11 special coverage, Vaughn, who had reported from Ground Zero in Manhattan, was conspicuously left out of the program. Vaughn also alleges that he was excluded from CBS’s new promotional campaign for its evening shows in the fall of 2022, despite being the premier evening anchor. The promotional billboard featured all of Vaughn’s co-anchors, who were either racial or gender minorities, while Vaughn was the only anchor not included. The alleged discrimination occurred at a time when CBS was pushing to increase diversity hiring. Under George Cheeks, who is now co-CEO of Paramount and CBS CEO, the network set a series of diversity goals, including staffing all writers’ rooms on its primetime series to be 40% BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, or People of Color) for the 2021-22 season. Seventeen out of 21 shows met or exceeded that target. In 2022, Tiffany Smith-Anoa’i, executive vice president of Paramount’s entertainment diversity, equity, and inclusion department, announced that the company’s “culture of belonging has doubled female representation, tripled people of color representation and we’re only getting started.” Vaughn claims that the diversity effort was “kicked into high gear” when CBS News and Stations president Wendy McMahon was hired in 2021. McMahon, who now holds the role of CBS News CEO, was publicly recognized for her work in making the station group more diverse, on both sides of the camera and in leadership positions. Vaughn alleges that McMahon replaced him with Chauncy Glover, a 37-year-old African-American anchor from ABC’s Houston bureau. "The truth is, CBS News, at the direction of McMahon, implemented an illegal hiring, promotion, or retention policy based on age, race, sexual orientation, and sex," Vaughn's lawsuit claims. On his last day, Vaughn was asked by his manager to publicly announce that it was his decision to leave, but he refused. After his last day on September 22, 2023, the news team issued a live statement implying that Vaughn had left of his own accord. The statement read: "Friday was Jeff Vaughn’s last newscast with KCAL news. Now, he didn’t want to make a big fuss about leaving, but we wanted you to know. He has been a vital part of the KCAL news team for 8 years, and we have taken great pride working with Jeff to share your stories." As the lawsuit progresses, it is likely to spark further debate on the balance between diversity initiatives and allegations of reverse discrimination, potentially setting a significant precedent in employment and discrimination law. Vaughn’s case underscores the complex dynamics of implementing diversity policies in the workplace and raises critical questions about fairness and equality in employment practices. Credit: NYP 2024-07-05 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In a significant escalation of the ongoing conflict, Lebanon's Hezbollah launched a large-scale rocket and drone attack on Israel. The assault was reportedly in retaliation for the killing of senior Hezbollah commander Mohammed Nasser, marking a severe intensification in hostilities that have already stretched over months. Despite efforts by both sides and international diplomats to avoid a full-scale war, the risk of a broader conflict looms large. On Thursday, Hezbollah claimed responsibility for launching more than 200 rockets and numerous drones targeting ten Israeli military sites. This aggressive move was a direct response to the death of Nasser, one of the most senior Hezbollah figures killed by Israel in the current conflict. The Israeli military confirmed that approximately "200 projectiles and over 20 suspicious aerial targets" had crossed from Lebanon into Israeli territory, with several intercepted by air defenses and fighter jets. Thankfully, no casualties were reported, although the interceptions and subsequent shrapnel did ignite fires in some areas. In retaliation, the Israeli air force struck Hezbollah military positions in Ramyeh and Houla, two villages in southern Lebanon. This exchange of fire has caused considerable anxiety, particularly in Beirut, where the sound of Israeli jets breaking the sound barrier for the second consecutive day has rattled the city's residents. Lebanon's National News Agency reported that the sonic booms were felt across several areas of the country, further heightening tensions. Hezbollah has indicated that its campaign of retaliation will continue. Senior official Hashem Safieddine warned that new, unexpected targets would be hit, stating, "The series of responses continues in succession, and this series will continue to target new sites that the enemy did not imagine would be hit." This declaration underscores the determination of Hezbollah to maintain its offensive posture in the face of Israeli actions. The conflict, which has been gradually intensifying since it was initially sparked by the Gaza war, has taken a heavy toll on both sides of the Lebanon-Israel frontier. Tens of thousands have been displaced, and the continued hostilities have strained communities on both sides of the border. The violence has inflicted a significant psychological and physical toll on the civilian populations, with many living in constant fear of the next attack. The United States has been leading diplomatic efforts to de-escalate the situation. Amos Hochstein, a senior U.S. official, met with French officials to discuss joint American and French efforts to restore calm. A White House official emphasized the shared goal of resolving the conflict diplomatically, ensuring safety and security for both Israeli and Lebanese civilians, and allowing them to return home. "France and the United States share the goal of resolving the current conflict across the Blue Line by diplomatic means, allowing Israeli and Lebanese civilians to return home with long-term assurances of safety and security," the official said, referring to the demarcation line between the two neighbors. Israeli Defence Minister Yoav Gallant has reiterated Israel's readiness to take necessary actions against Hezbollah while expressing a preference for a negotiated settlement. Gallant stated that Israeli forces were striking Hezbollah "very hard every day" and emphasized that they are prepared for any necessary action against the group. "We will be ready to take any action necessary against the group, though the preference is to reach a negotiated arrangement," Gallant said, highlighting the delicate balance Israel seeks to maintain between military response and diplomatic resolution. The current conflict between Hezbollah and Israel began intensifying after Hezbollah's ally, Hamas, launched an attack on Israel on October 7. Since then, Hezbollah has continuously targeted Israeli sites along the border in support of the Palestinians. This support for Hamas has further complicated the situation, drawing in various factions and increasing the complexity of achieving peace. The international community remains deeply concerned about the potential for a full-scale war. Diplomats are working tirelessly to find a peaceful resolution, but the ongoing cycle of retaliation and military strikes indicates that achieving lasting peace will be a significant challenge. The situation remains volatile, with both sides showing no signs of backing down in the immediate future. As the violence continues to escalate, the hope for a diplomatic solution seems increasingly elusive, leaving civilians on both sides in a state of perpetual uncertainty and fear. The conflict's impact on daily life in both Lebanon and Israel cannot be overstated. In Lebanon, the sound of sonic booms and the fear of further attacks have created a pervasive atmosphere of anxiety. In Israel, the constant threat of rocket fire has led to a state of high alert and disruption of normal life. The international community watches closely, with a sense of urgency and concern, as the situation develops. The path to peace remains fraught with obstacles, but the relentless efforts of diplomats and the resilience of civilians offer a glimmer of hope amidst the darkness of conflict. Credit: Reuters 2024-07-05 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

US President Joe Biden has acknowledged that he "screwed up" during last week's debate against Donald Trump, but he remains committed to staying in the election race and has moved to reassure key allies. In an interview with a Wisconsin radio station, Biden admitted to making a "mistake" with his stumbling performance, urging voters to judge him based on his tenure in the White House rather than his debate performance. In response to reports suggesting he was reconsidering his candidacy, Biden worked to calm senior Democrats, including state governors and campaign staff, asserting his determination to remain the Democratic nominee. "I'm the nominee of the Democratic Party. No one's pushing me out. I'm not leaving," he said during a call with his broader campaign team, according to a source who spoke to BBC News. Vice-President Kamala Harris, who was also on the call, reiterated her support for Biden. Despite speculation about whether Harris could replace Biden as the party’s candidate, Biden sent a clear message through a fundraising email: "Let me say this as clearly and simply as I can: I'm running." Concerns about Biden's fitness for office have intensified following a debate characterized by verbal blanks and a weak voice. These concerns have been amplified by polling data showing a widening lead for Trump. A New York Times poll conducted after the debate indicated that Trump now holds his biggest lead yet at six points. Additionally, a CBS News poll showed Trump leading Biden by three points in key battleground states. The polling data has been accompanied by public calls from some Democratic donors and lawmakers for Biden to step aside. Among them is Ramesh Kapur, a longtime Democratic fundraiser, who told the BBC, "I think it’s time for him to pass the torch. I know he has the drive, but you can’t fight Mother Nature." Representative Raul Grijalva of Arizona also suggested it was time for Democrats to "look elsewhere." Despite the pressure, the White House and Biden's campaign have strongly denied reports that he is considering dropping out. Both the New York Times and CNN reported that Biden had confided in an unnamed ally about the precariousness of his re-election bid. However, a spokesperson dismissed these reports as “absolutely false.” White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre also refuted the claims, asserting that Biden is committed to defeating Trump in the upcoming election. Biden met with a group of 20 state governors, including California’s Gavin Newsom and Michigan’s Gretchen Whitmer, both of whom have been mentioned as potential replacements should Biden step aside. Maryland Governor Wes Moore expressed solidarity with Biden, stating, "The president has always had our backs, we’re going to have his back as well." Despite Harris's poor approval ratings, her support among Democrats has increased since the debate, making her a likely successor if Biden were to step down. Amid the speculation, Trump has shifted some of his focus to attacking Harris. In footage obtained by the Daily Beast, Trump is seen mocking Biden and suggesting that Harris would be "better" but still "pathetic." Harris, maintaining her role as a supportive partner, appeared on CNN after the debate to express her full support for Biden. "She has always been mindful to be a good partner to the president," her former communications director Jamal Simmons told BBC News. A source close to Harris confirmed that she would continue to campaign for Biden. Members of the Democratic National Committee are responsible for officially nominating Biden at the August convention. One member, speaking anonymously, suggested that the nomination should go to Harris if Biden decides not to run, cautioning that opening up the convention would cause chaos detrimental to the party in November. A report by the Washington Post highlighted that Biden and his team recognize the need to demonstrate his fitness for office in the coming days. Biden has planned trips to Wisconsin and Philadelphia and is scheduled to appear on ABC News for his first televised interview since the debate. His full interview with Wisconsin's Civic Media is also set to be published soon. While admitting to his debate performance mistake, Biden emphasized, "That's 90 minutes on stage. Look at what I've done in 3.5 years." Credit: BBC 2024-07-05 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In a landmark decision, an Iranian-born Norwegian man was sentenced to 30 years in prison for his role in a terrorist attack on an LGBTQ+ festival in Oslo in 2022. The Oslo District Court found Zaniar Matapour guilty of terrorism for the June 25, 2022, attack, which left two people dead and nine seriously wounded. The incident took place at three locations, with the main attack occurring outside the London Pub, a well-known gay bar. Matapour, who had sworn allegiance to the Islamic State group, fired ten rounds with a machine gun and eight shots with a handgun into the crowd. The court noted that Matapour had been radicalized for several years. His sentence is the most severe penalty issued in Norway since the country's terror legislation was revised in 2015. Under the terms of his sentence, Matapour can request parole after 20 years, but he will only be released if he is deemed no longer a threat to society. Prosecutor Aud Kinsarvik Gravås described the outcome as "the right outcome" and emphasized the historical severity of the punishment. Matapour’s lawyer, Marius Dietrichson, acknowledged the severity of the sentence and mentioned that a decision on whether to appeal has not yet been made. One of the victims, Espen Evjenth, who was shot in the forehead at the London Pub, expressed relief at the verdict. The court presented extensive video evidence of the attack during the trial. While the verdict was not read aloud in court, it was distributed electronically, and Matapour was to have it read to him in prison. Matapour was apprehended by bystanders shortly after the attack and was subsequently arrested. The attack led to the cancellation of a planned Pride parade due to security concerns. The shooting deeply shocked Norway, a country known for its low crime rate but which has experienced several "lone wolf" attacks in recent years. The most notable of these was the 2011 mass shooting on the island of Utoya, where a right-wing extremist killed 69 people after setting off a bomb in Oslo that claimed eight more lives. In the days leading up to the 2022 attack, Norway’s external intelligence agency, E-Tjenesten, had received information from an undercover agent about a potential action in a Nordic country. This information was shared with the domestic security service. Matapour, who pleaded innocent, was evaluated by a court-appointed psychiatrist who concluded that he was sane at the time of the attack. During the trial, both the prosecution and defense agreed that Matapour had fired into the crowd and that the attack was terror-motivated. However, Matapour's lawyer argued for acquittal, claiming that his client had been provoked by an E-Tjenesten agent posing as a high-ranking Islamic State member. The court dismissed this claim, stating that the actions of the E-Tjenesten did not involve any illegal provocation and did not incite a terrorist act that would not have otherwise been committed. The trial, which began in March and concluded on May 16, marks a significant moment in Norway's ongoing efforts to combat terrorism and ensure justice for victims of such heinous acts. Start of Trial Credit: ABC News 2024-07-05 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In a disturbing incident in Stockton, three boys have been arrested following an alleged hate crime that resulted in the stabbing of a transgender woman. The attack took place on Norton Road, with armed police responding to the scene shortly before 6 p.m. on Tuesday, July 3. Upon arrival, officers discovered the victim, a woman in her 20s, suffering from a severe wound to her leg. She was promptly taken to the hospital, where she underwent surgery due to the extent of her injuries. The boys, aged 16, 14, and 12, were detained on suspicion of causing grievous bodily harm and taken into police custody for questioning. The Cleveland Police are treating the incident as a hate crime and are providing support to the victim and her family through specialist officers. Assistant Chief Constable Richard Baker of Cleveland Police emphasized the gravity of the situation, stating, "Nobody should ever have to fear being targeted for simply being who they are. Physical violence against a person, or slurs made regarding a person’s gender identity, race, disability or any other difference, is not acceptable and will not be tolerated in our communities." He further highlighted the serious nature of hate crimes, acknowledging the traumatic and long-lasting effects they can have on victims. "Cleveland Police takes all reports of hate crime and hate crime incidents extremely seriously," Baker added. He urged victims and those concerned about potential hate crimes to report them, assuring that the police have dedicated officers to support victims through investigations and strive to bring offenders to justice. The police are actively investigating the case and are appealing to the public for any information that could aid their investigation. They have specifically requested that anyone with CCTV, dash cam, or doorbell footage related to the incident contact them by calling 101 and quoting reference number 124844. The swift response by the police and the arrests of the suspects underscore the commitment to addressing hate crimes and ensuring the safety of all individuals, regardless of their gender identity or any other characteristic that may make them a target for such attacks. Credit: ITV 2024-07-05 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Taiwanese officials have reported that China seized a Taiwanese fishing boat under a new protocol allowing the Chinese coast guard to detain vessels operating within what Beijing considers its maritime borders. The incident occurred earlier this week and has heightened tensions between Taiwan and China. The Taiwanese Coast Guard Administration (CGA) announced on Wednesday that China has intensified its maritime patrols since implementing a regulation in June that authorizes the seizure of vessels for up to 60 days in waters claimed by Beijing. In response, CGA Deputy Director-General Hsieh Ching-Chin stated during a news conference that Taiwan would increase its patrols to protect its fishing vessels, according to Taiwan’s state-run Central News Agency. Hsieh demanded the release of the detained fishing boat, the Da Jin Man No. 88, which was seized near Taiwan’s Kinmen Islands on Tuesday night. The Chinese coast guard detained two Taiwanese citizens and three Indonesians on board. The Taiwanese CGA dispatched ships to rescue the fishing vessel but had to retreat when China sent reinforcements. The fishing boat was operating near Jinjiang City within China's territorial waters, an area the Taiwanese Fisheries Agency described as commonly used for fishing with a general agreement for joint use. This seizure comes amid soaring tensions following the inauguration of Taiwanese President William Lai Ching-te, whom Beijing labels a separatist. After Lai’s inauguration, China launched significant military drills around Taiwan, which it claims as its own territory. Chinese aircraft regularly threaten Taiwan’s airspace, prompting the island nation to scramble its jets, and Chinese vessels continue to harass Taiwan’s maritime borders. The South China Sea dispute, where China claims much of the territory despite an international arbitration order rejecting these claims, has also led to escalating tensions with nearby nations, including the Philippines. Last month, Chinese personnel armed with machetes attacked Filipino sailors aboard a Philippine ship at Second Thomas Shoal, a disputed reef in the South China Sea. The Philippines has been seeking to bolster a beached ship at the shoal amidst the ongoing territorial dispute. The recent seizure of the Taiwanese fishing boat and ongoing maritime conflicts underscore the fragile and volatile nature of the region’s geopolitical landscape, with Taiwan and neighboring countries facing increasing pressure from China’s assertive maritime claims and actions. Credit: Hill 2024-07-05 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Pink Floyd co-founder Roger Waters has ignited a firestorm of controversy after accusing Israel of spreading "filthy and disgusting lies" about atrocities committed by Hamas during their October 7 rampage. The 80-year-old musician, known for his outspoken views on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, made these claims during a heated interview with Piers Morgan on "Piers Morgan Uncensored." During the interview, Waters vehemently denied the existence of evidence supporting reports that Hamas terrorists had burned babies and raped women. Despite a United Nations report earlier this year detailing incidents of "sexualized torture," including rapes and gang-rapes by Hamas, Waters insisted there was no proof of such crimes. "I'm not saying a part of the Palestinian resistance movement didn't cross that wire fence. I am not saying that didn't happen at all," Waters stated. However, he questioned Israel's response, asking, "Why did they wait seven hours before they started machine-gunning everyone?" The exchange grew increasingly tense as Waters suggested the need for a "real investigation" into the events of October 7, beyond what he called the "very good Al Jazeera documentary" and the work of the Grayzone, which he credited with debunking Israeli claims. When Morgan confirmed that women were indeed raped during the attacks, Waters retorted angrily, "No, they weren't. There’s no evidence." In an unusual turn, Waters began whispering to himself on camera in an apparent attempt to calm down, saying, "Roger, Roger, calm down. Don't sink to his level, alright I won't. Stop shouting. Stop shouting back. Let him interrupt you as much as he wants." Morgan read out a tweet from former Pink Floyd lyricist Polly Samson, who described Waters as "antisemitic to the rotten core" and a "Putin apologist," a sentiment echoed by bandmate David Gilmour. Waters dismissed the remarks with a brief, "No comment. Oh, shut up... They're public and I'm private." Waters' comments have reignited debate over his stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and his frequent criticism of Israel, which some have labeled as antisemitic. His insistence on questioning documented atrocities has drawn sharp criticism and added to the polarizing discourse surrounding the issue. Others have said he exhibited signs of Schizophrenia as he talks to the voices in his head. "Interviewed many thousands of people over the years, but never had one who started talking to himself" Full Interview Credit: Daily Mail | X 2024-07-05 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Live updates: UK heads to the polls in an election that could end 14 years of Conservative government.

In a significant legal development seven years after the violent Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, a federal appeals court has reinstated more than $2 million in punitive damages against white nationalist leaders and organizations. These individuals and groups were implicated in the physical and emotional injuries suffered by people at the event. The decision brought the total amount that a jury ordered to be paid to more than $26 million, most of which was intended as punitive damages. Initially, a jury had ordered $24 million in punitive damages, but a lower court judge later slashed this amount to $350,000 to be shared by eight plaintiffs. However, on Monday, the Richmond-based Fourth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals restored more than $2 million in punitive damages. The court found that each of the plaintiffs should receive $350,000, instead of the $43,750 each would have received under the lower court’s ruling. A three-judge panel at the Fourth Circuit affirmed the jury’s award of $2 million in compensatory damages, but it found that a state law imposing the $350,000 cap on punitive damages should be applied per person instead of for all eight plaintiffs, as the lower court judge had ruled. The ruling stems from a federal lawsuit against two dozen white nationalists and organizations that participated in the two days of demonstrations in Charlottesville to protest against the city’s plan to remove a statue of Confederate General Robert E. Lee. The events of the second day of the rally escalated dramatically when, after the Unite the Right rally had been declared an unlawful assembly, James Alex Fields Jr., a white supremacist from Maumee, Ohio, intentionally drove his car into a crowd of counter-protesters. This attack resulted in the death of one woman and injuries to dozens more. Fields, who was one of the defendants in the civil case, is currently serving a life sentence for murder and hate crimes. The Fourth Circuit panel rejected a request from the defendants to ask Virginia’s Supreme Court to rule on whether each plaintiff could receive $350,000 in punitive damages. The court stated that the state law’s language and history were “clear enough to predict how Virginia’s high court would rule.” “Over two years ago, the jury used its $24 million punitive damages award to send an unmistakable message to the defendants and to the public about the outrageous misconduct that took place in Charlottesville, Virginia. While the law compels us to reduce the award, it’s long past time for that message to be delivered,” wrote the court’s chief judge, Albert Diaz, in the unanimous 3-0 ruling. Attorneys for the plaintiffs expressed their satisfaction with the court’s decision. “Today’s decision restores over $2 million in punitive damages from the jury’s verdict, which sent a clear message against racist and antisemitic hate and violence,” attorneys Roberta Kaplan, David E. Mills, and Gabrielle E. Tenzer said in a statement. The defendants' lawyers did not immediately respond to emails seeking comment. The original verdict from the 2021 trial was seen as a significant rebuke to the white nationalist movement. It particularly targeted the two dozen individuals and organizations accused in the federal lawsuit of orchestrating violence against Black people, Jewish people, and others in a meticulously planned conspiracy. This ruling underscores the judiciary's stance against hate-fueled violence and reaffirms the legal repercussions for those who orchestrate and perpetrate such acts. The reinstatement of significant punitive damages serves not only as a form of justice for the victims but also as a stern warning to any groups contemplating similar actions in the future. Credit: The Guardian 2024-07-04 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

The debate surrounding transgender issues and radical gender ideology has significantly transformed the political landscape in Britain. Keir Starmer, the Labour Party leader and potential next Prime Minister, finds himself navigating questions on whether a woman can have a penis—a topic that would have seemed outlandish in 2010. This shift in discourse is largely attributed to high-profile interventions, such as those by JK Rowling, which have thrust transgender issues into the public eye and forced political parties to take clear stances. Over the past decade, the Conservative government has allowed radical gender ideology to permeate various sectors, from education to healthcare. The mandatory Relationship and Sex Education curriculum in schools, for instance, has been leveraged by activist groups to promote their views on gender identity, leading to confusion among teachers and parents. Research in 2022 highlighted that only a fraction of schools would inform parents if their child considered transitioning, and many taught that children could be "born in the wrong body." The Public Sector Equality Duty, often criticized for fostering identity politics, has entrenched radical gender ideology across numerous government departments and public bodies. This has resulted in controversial outcomes, such as male-born athletes competing in female sports and male-born prisoners being housed in women's prisons. The next government will face pressing questions on issues like the use of puberty blockers for children, protection of single-sex spaces, and the regulation of sports and educational materials. Public opinion on transgender issues has shifted notably. Support for allowing transgender people to change the sex on their birth certificate has decreased from 59% in 2016 to 26% today. Concurrently, nearly half of the population believes that attempts to ensure equal opportunities for transgender people have gone too far. Reflecting this sentiment, Starmer has stated that "women have a vagina and men have a penis" and expressed opposition to teaching gender ideology in schools, aligning with public discomfort over these issues. Starmer's challenge, if he becomes Prime Minister, will be translating his centrist rhetoric into effective governance. Labour's commitment to implementing the Cass Review's recommendations on transgender healthcare and a trans-inclusive ban on conversion practices illustrates the party's internal conflicts and the complexity of balancing competing priorities. A critical step for Starmer would be to address the activism within the public sector. Many controversial policies have been introduced by public bodies and external agencies, often without ministerial approval. Starmer's track record of marginalizing the Corbynite Left within the Labour Party suggests he understands the importance of organizational cohesion. The real test will be whether he can similarly restore impartiality in the public sector and curtail the influence of activist-driven policies. Ultimately, Starmer's ability to manage this issue will significantly impact his leadership and the direction of the Labour Party, as well as the broader political discourse in Britain. Starmer knows that radical gender ideology is not popular; otherwise, he would not have said the things that he has. The proportion of people who agree that “a transgender person should be able to change the sex on their birth certificate” has dropped from a high of 59 percent in 2016 to 26 percent today. Simultaneously, 47 percent believe “attempts to give equal opportunities to transgender people have gone too far,” compared to only 22 percent who think they have not gone far enough. It is perhaps for this reason that he has recently clarified that he thinks “women have a vagina and men have a penis,” and moved quickly to suggest he believes that gender ideology should not be taught in schools, after his Shadow Education Secretary repeatedly refused to endorse the Government’s draft guidance. In Government, though, actions as well as words are needed. Labour’s recent tack to the centre puts it sharply at odds with many of its activists – and no small number of the parliamentary party – for whom “trans rights” are a sacred value. Difficult choices will have to be made. How, for example, could they simultaneously “implement the expert recommendations of the Cass Review” and introduce a “full trans-inclusive ban on conversion practices” – both commitments in their manifesto? If Starmer wants to control the narrative on this agenda, one of the most important steps he could take is end the tide of activism within the public sector. Many of the more egregious policies of recent years were never commanded by ministers – but rather were introduced by stealth by public bodies, with staff networks and external training agencies advocating for the erasure of women’s rights and promoting ‘Stonewall law’ as fact. More than one Minister has found themselves in hot water as a result. Starmer has shown himself to be ruthless at clearing out the Corbynite Left from within the Labour Party. He understands that no organization can function well when certain factions push their own agenda and refuse to accept the authority of the leader. If he becomes Prime Minister, is he willing to be similarly ruthless in restoring impartiality to the public sector? Radical gender ideology is deeply embedded, and the next Government will have a number of questions to address. Will they defend the ban on giving puberty blockers to children, currently being challenged in the courts? Will they protect single-sex intimate care in the NHS and protect women’s spaces in prisons and in refuge centers? Will they continue funding sporting bodies that allow biological males to compete in the female category? Will they endorse the two critical pieces of schools guidance currently out to consultation? These would, among other things, guarantee parents’ right to see teaching materials and ensure they are informed if their child questioned their gender, and clarify that schools should not teach the contested concept of gender identity. Starmer's ability to manage this issue will significantly impact his leadership and the direction of the Labour Party, as well as the broader political discourse in Britain. This shift in discourse is largely attributed to high-profile interventions, such as those by JK Rowling, which have thrust transgender issues into the public eye and forced political parties to take clear stances. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-07-04 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

A network of Russia-based websites, disguised as local American newspapers, has been disseminating fake stories in a sophisticated, AI-powered disinformation campaign targeting the US election. This BBC investigation reveals a key figure behind this operation is a former Florida police officer who moved to Moscow. A notable example of these fabricated stories involves Olena Zelenska, the first lady of Ukraine. The false report claimed she bought a rare Bugatti Tourbillon sports car for €4.5 million ($4.8 million) in Paris using American military aid money. The story, appearing on an obscure French website, was quickly debunked. Experts noted anomalies in the posted invoice, and Bugatti issued a denial, calling it "fake news." However, the falsehood had already gone viral, with pro-Russia, pro-Trump activist Jackson Hinkle spreading it to over 6.5 million people on X (formerly Twitter). In total, at least 12 million X users saw the story, demonstrating the operation's effectiveness in spreading disinformation. This network, which BBC Verify first exposed last year, initially aimed to undermine Ukraine's government. Now, it focuses on influencing US voters and sowing distrust ahead of November's election. The investigation, conducted over six months and examining hundreds of articles across dozens of websites, shows that some fake stories have been shared by influencers and US Congress members. One significant fake story alleged that the FBI illegally wiretapped Donald Trump’s Florida resort, published on a website called The Houston Post, one of many sites with American-sounding names but run from Moscow. This falsehood played into Trump’s narrative of a biased legal system and a conspiracy against his campaign. Trump himself has accused the FBI of eavesdropping on his conversations. According to experts, this operation is part of a larger effort led from Moscow to spread disinformation during the US election campaign. While no hard evidence links these particular fake news websites directly to the Russian state, researchers note the operation's scale and sophistication resemble previous Kremlin-backed disinformation efforts. Chris Krebs, former director of the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, commented, “Russia will be involved in the US 2024 election, as will others,” highlighting the ongoing threat of foreign interference. The BBC contacted the Russian Foreign Ministry and Russia’s US and UK embassies but received no response. They also attempted to contact Hinkle for comment. Since disinformation campaigns gained attention during the 2016 US election, operators have become more creative in spreading their content and making it appear credible. This operation uses AI to generate thousands of news articles for dozens of sites with American-sounding names like Houston Post, Chicago Crier, Boston Times, and DC Weekly. Many stories on these sites are not outright fakes but are based on real news, rewritten by AI to fit a conservative stance. These stories are attributed to fake journalists with made-up names and profile pictures taken from the internet, such as a photo of best-selling writer Judy Batalion used for multiple stories under the name "Jessica Devlin." The operation's automation is evident in the sheer volume of content and its repetition across different websites, creating the illusion of legitimate news sources. Interspersed within this content are fake stories increasingly targeting American audiences. These stories often mix American and Ukrainian political issues, aiming to manipulate public perception. Clement Briens, senior threat intelligence analyst at Recorded Future, noted the operation’s scale, with 120 websites registered over three days in May. Newsguard, a company tracking misinformation sites, counted at least 170 sites connected to the operation. McKenzie Sadeghi, Newsguard’s AI and foreign influence editor, observed the operation's significant growth in size and reach, with Russia regularly amplifying these narratives via state TV, officials, and influencers. To make the fake stories more credible, operatives create YouTube videos featuring supposed “whistleblowers” or “independent journalists,” often using actors or AI-generated voices. These videos are cited in text stories on the fake newspaper websites and shared on social media, reaching both Russian influencers and Western audiences. For example, a story from DC Weekly about Ukrainian officials buying yachts with US military aid was repeated by US politicians, including Senator J.D. Vance and Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene. John Mark Dougan, a former US Marine and police officer, is a key figure in this operation. After fleeing to Moscow in 2016 following an FBI raid, Dougan has been involved in spreading disinformation. Despite denying involvement with the websites, digital evidence links him to the operation. Dougan's activities seem partly motivated by revenge against American authorities. The operation, initially focused on the war in Ukraine, has shifted to American and British politics, with false stories about US politics gaining prominence. Microsoft’s Clint Watts warned of the potential impact of this sophisticated disinformation campaign on the upcoming election, emphasizing the need to address this evolving threat. Nina Jankowicz, head of the American Sunlight Project, noted the shift towards “information laundering,” where fake stories are recycled into the mainstream to obscure their source. With increasing efforts to spread stories about UK politics and the Paris Olympics, the operation shows no signs of slowing down. Dougan, hinting at bigger plans, stated, “Don’t worry, the game is being upped,” indicating the ongoing evolution of this disinformation campaign. Credit: BBC 2024-07-04 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In a significant development, German and Swedish authorities announced on Wednesday the arrest of eight men suspected of committing crimes against humanity during Syria's civil war. These coordinated arrests highlight the ongoing efforts by European nations to hold perpetrators accountable for atrocities committed in the conflict. The Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office in Germany stated that four stateless Syrian Palestinians and a Syrian national were "strongly suspected of killing and attempting to kill civilians, qualified as crimes against humanity and war crimes." Meanwhile, Swedish authorities confirmed the arrest of three individuals for alleged crimes against humanity. German authorities detailed the arrests, identifying the suspects as Jihad A., Mazhar J., and Sameer S., who were apprehended in Berlin, Mahmoud A. in Frankenthal, Rhineland-Palatinate, and Wael S. near Boizenburg in Mecklenburg-West Pomerania. These men are accused of participating in severe abuses and killings during the Syrian civil war. According to the German Prosecutor's Office, Mazhar J. was a member of the Syrian Military Intelligence Service's Branch 235, and he is accused of abusing at least one person in a Syrian prison. The other suspects—Jihad A., Mahmoud A., Sameer S., and Wael S.—were allegedly affiliated with the Free Palestine Movement (FPM), which controlled the Al Yarmouk district in Damascus on behalf of Bashar Assad's regime around the spring of 2011. The FPM reportedly worked closely with the Syrian Military Intelligence Service, including Branches 227 and 235, also known as the Palestine branch. These branches have been accused of committing numerous atrocities throughout the war, including mass killings, torture, and other severe abuses. Prosecutors allege that all suspects arrested in Germany took part in a violent crackdown in Al Yarmouk in July 2012, where civilian protesters were specifically targeted and shot, resulting in the deaths of six people. Additionally, four of the suspects are accused of physically abusing civilians at checkpoints in Al Yarmouk severely and repeatedly. Furthermore, German authorities claimed that three civilian victims of a massacre on April 16, 2013, in which 41 people were killed, had been arrested at one of these checkpoints and handed over to Branch 227 by Mahmoud A. In Sweden, three alleged FPM members suspected of participating in the Al Yarmouk crackdown were arrested. Swedish prosecutor Ulrika Bentelius Egelrud, overseeing the investigation, attributed the arrests to "good cooperation with Germany, Eurojust, and Europol." Germany has been a significant destination for Syrian refugees fleeing the civil war, which has raged since 2011. The country has previously taken steps to bring Syrian war criminals to justice. In 2022, a German court in the western city of Koblenz convicted a Syrian ex-colonel of crimes against humanity, setting a precedent for such cases. These recent arrests underscore the commitment of European nations to pursue justice for victims of the Syrian conflict. By targeting individuals responsible for heinous crimes, authorities aim to provide a measure of accountability and hope for those who have suffered immensely during the war. Credit: DW 2024-07-04 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

The U.S. government has allocated a substantial $176 million contract to vaccine maker Moderna to aid in the development of a pandemic influenza vaccine for humans. This move comes in response to growing concerns about a bird flu outbreak affecting cattle on U.S. dairy farms. Although there is currently no evidence of the virus spreading from human to human, the potential for the virus to evolve and increase the risk to the general public remains a pressing concern. The outbreak, which began in March, has already led to three confirmed infections among dairy workers. Experts warn that this number is likely to grow as the situation progresses. The funding provided by the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) will support the late-stage development of an mRNA-based vaccine. This vaccine leverages the same technology used in Moderna's highly successful COVID-19 vaccine, developed during the peak of the global pandemic. Moderna's candidate bird flu vaccine is currently undergoing phase one trials, with data on its effectiveness expected to be available in the coming weeks. Health and Human Services Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, Dawn O'Connell, stated during a recent call with reporters that if the vaccine candidate is found to be safe and effective, a phase three trial is anticipated to begin in 2025. O'Connell emphasized the importance of the contract between BARDA and Moderna, noting that it includes an option to accelerate development. "If it looks like we're starting to see some pressure regarding what is happening with the dairy cows and starting to get extraordinarily concerned about additional human cases, severity of human cases, human-to-human transmission," O'Connell explained, the development process could be expedited. In addition to the Moderna vaccine, the federal government has contracted CSL Seqirus to produce 4.8 million doses of an existing bird flu vaccine that uses a traditional vaccine platform. The first doses of this vaccine are expected to be completed later this month. Officials are considering making these doses available to farm workers who are at higher risk of exposure to the virus. However, the finished doses will still need to undergo final approvals from the FDA and CDC before they can be deployed. "At this point, we remain extraordinarily watchful," O'Connell said, highlighting the cautious approach being taken by health authorities. The Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response is collaborating closely with other public health partners to determine the appropriate timing for moving these vaccines from production lines to deployment. Among the considerations is whether other methods, such as increased use of antivirals in cows, might be more effective than human vaccine campaigns, which could potentially face low uptake. In a related development, the U.S. Department of Agriculture and Food and Drug Administration released a study confirming that flash pasteurization of milk effectively destroys the bird flu virus. This finding reassures the public about the safety of dairy products amidst the outbreak. Federal officials reiterated that individuals should avoid consuming raw milk products to minimize the risk of infection. The allocation of $176 million to Moderna for the development of a bird flu vaccine underscores the U.S. government's proactive stance in addressing potential public health threats. By leveraging the proven mRNA technology, which played a crucial role in combating COVID-19, health authorities aim to stay ahead of the evolving bird flu situation. As Dawn O'Connell noted, the situation requires vigilant monitoring and readiness to act swiftly should the virus pose a greater threat to human health. The collaboration between federal agencies, vaccine manufacturers, and public health officials represents a comprehensive effort to safeguard public health and prevent a potential pandemic. The government’s decision to prioritize the development of both mRNA and traditional vaccines reflects a multi-faceted approach to pandemic preparedness. While the mRNA vaccine is being fast-tracked for potential rapid response, the traditional vaccine provides a backup option that could be deployed more immediately to high-risk populations, such as farm workers. This dual strategy ensures that there are multiple lines of defense against the bird flu virus, enhancing the overall resilience of the public health system. Credit: AXIOS 2024-07-04 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Martina Navratilova, the legendary tennis champion with 18 major singles titles, has voiced strong opposition to a controversial new campaign by lingerie company Bluebella. The campaign, which features members of Team GB's Olympic rugby sevens squad posing in lingerie, aims to convey that women can be both muscular and feminine. However, it has sparked significant backlash from prominent figures in women's sports, including Navratilova. Bluebella’s #StrongIsBeautiful campaign features Ellie Boatman, Jasmine Joyce, and Celia Quansah, though Quansah did not make the final cut for the Paris Olympics. The company’s intention was to challenge stereotypes and show that strong female athletes can also embrace their femininity. Despite these intentions, the campaign has been widely criticized as regressive and sexist. Navratilova expressed her dismay, stating, "The campaign feels really regressive and sexist to me." Her sentiments were echoed by Sharron Davies, a former swimmer, and Mara Yamauchi, a former British distance runner. Davies took to social media platform X to express her outrage, calling the campaign "an utterly shameful campaign" and questioning the decision to feature professional female athletes in what she described as "porn underwear." She criticized the campaign for perpetuating stereotypes and not addressing the real issues faced by young girls in sports. Yamauchi also criticized the campaign, labeling it "exploitative, demeaning, sexist, regressive rubbish." She argued that the primary audience for such a campaign is men, and portraying women as sex objects does nothing to encourage teenage girls to participate in sports. The criticism comes in the context of concerning statistics from Women In Sport, which reveal that 64 percent of secondary schoolgirls drop out of sports due to insecurities about their bodies during puberty. Critics like Davies and Yamauchi argue that campaigns like this do not help to tackle these issues and may even exacerbate them. The #StrongIsBeautiful campaign has been running for the past eight years and has previously included female athletes for the Rio and Tokyo Olympics. Despite its longevity, this latest iteration has clearly struck a nerve. Ellie Boatman, one of the athletes featured in the campaign, spoke about her experiences in an article for the Evening Standard. She recounted instances where boys were encouraged to target her on the field because she was perceived as the weak link simply because she was a girl. Boatman also highlighted the disparity in treatment and resources between boys’ and girls’ sports, noting that she often had to wear boys' kits that did not fit her properly. While Bluebella’s campaign intended to send a positive message about strength and femininity, the backlash from respected figures in women’s sports indicates a need for a more nuanced approach to addressing body image and participation in sports among young girls. The debate sparked by this campaign underscores the ongoing struggle to balance empowering messages with sensitivity to the issues faced by female athletes. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-07-04 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a prominent anti-vaccine advocate, has been linked to the deadly measles outbreak in Samoa in 2019, which claimed the lives of 83 people, mostly children. In the documentary "Shot in the Arm" (2023), Kennedy was asked about the outbreak and claimed, “I’m aware there was a measles outbreak…I had nothing to do with people not vaccinating in Samoa. I never told anybody not to vaccinate. I didn’t go there with any reason to do with that.” This statement, however, is misleading and sidesteps his significant connection to the tragic event. Kennedy's nonprofit organization, Children’s Health Defense (CHD), played a role in spreading misinformation that contributed to the decline in measles vaccination rates in Samoa. Before the outbreak, measles was not a significant issue in Samoa. However, in 2018, two infants died after receiving the measles vaccine, which led to the country temporarily halting its vaccine program. Vaccine opponents, including CHD, exploited these deaths to raise concerns about vaccine safety, causing the vaccination rate to plummet from the 60-70% range to 31%. The actual cause of the infants' deaths was not the vaccine itself but a mistake made by two nurses who mixed the vaccine with a muscle relaxant. Despite this revelation, CHD did not update its social media posts that suggested the vaccine was to blame. During this period of declining vaccination coverage, Kennedy visited Samoa in June 2019 and supported local anti-vaxxers who used the deaths of the infants to further reduce vaccination rates. He met with Taylor Winterstein, a prominent anti-vaccine advocate, and in an Instagram post, Winterstein expressed her admiration for Kennedy, highlighting his influence. Public health experts criticized Kennedy's visit, stating that it amplified anti-vaccine voices in Samoa. Kennedy later claimed his meeting with Winterstein was a coincidence but admitted that his trip to Samoa was arranged by Edwin Tamasese, another prominent Samoan anti-vaxxer, and funded by CHD. Kennedy insisted that the purpose of his visit was to discuss a medical informatics system with Samoan government officials, which would assess the safety and efficacy of medical interventions, including vaccines. However, his interactions and public statements indicated a clear anti-vaccine agenda. After the measles outbreak in November 2019, the Samoan government launched an emergency compulsory vaccination program to contain the spread. Winterstein and Tamasese opposed this effort, spreading misinformation and comparing the vaccination campaign to Nazi Germany. Tamasese called the vaccination operation a “killing spree” and advocated for alternatives like papaya leaf extract and vitamins instead of conventional medicine and vaccines. He was eventually arrested and charged with incitement against a government order for his public opposition. During the outbreak, CHD wrote to the Samoan Prime Minister, suggesting that the measles vaccine itself might be responsible for the outbreak, mirroring Tamasese’s claims. Kennedy’s group continued to cast doubt on the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine, even as the outbreak caused thousands of cases and numerous deaths. In early 2021, Kennedy praised Tamasese as a “medical freedom hero” in a blog post, downplaying the severity of the measles outbreak and blaming the vaccine and hospital protocols for the deaths. A photo accompanying the post showed Kennedy with Tamasese and Winterstein, further solidifying his support for anti-vaccine activists. Kennedy’s public statements and actions demonstrate a clear pattern of promoting vaccine misinformation and supporting anti-vaccine activists, both in Samoa and globally. Despite his claims in the "Shot in the Arm" documentary, Kennedy’s involvement in spreading anti-vaccine rhetoric and misinformation significantly contributed to the deadly measles outbreak in Samoa. His actions illustrate the dangerous impact of anti-vaccine advocacy on public health and his consistent attempts to evade responsibility for the consequences of his influence. Credit: Mother Jones 2024-07-04 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In a shocking incident that has left the community reeling, a lesbian couple celebrating a birthday in downtown Halifax, Canada, was brutally beaten by a group of men after being subjected to homophobic slurs. The terrifying scene, captured on video, shows the couple surrounded by nearly a dozen men, with one woman lying on the ground while the other struggles to break free from one of the attackers. The assault occurred on June 22, when Emma MacLean and her girlfriend Tori Hogan were out celebrating Emma's birthday. The couple encountered a group of men who allegedly made rude comments about their sexuality. MacLean described the men as "Middle Eastern" and said they are "believed to be from Syria." Tori, upset by the slur, confronted the men, saying, "Hey, watch your mouth, that's my girlfriend." However, her attempt to stand up for Emma quickly escalated into violence. Around 1:30 a.m., the group of approximately ten men began beating Tori. Emma recounted the horrifying events to CTV News, describing how Tori was pushed onto cement stairs and then surrounded and attacked. "I see Tori being pushed on the stairs right in front of the BMO Centre, and they are cement stairs, and she's on her back—that's when all the men started punching and kicking them," Emma said. Despite Emma's attempts to intervene by yelling at the men to stop, they continued their assault on Tori. Emma described how she eventually tried to protect her girlfriend by physically restraining one of the attackers. "All at once they all just swarmed her and started punching and kicking her in the ribs. Then I kind of got into my fight or flight," Emma told Saltwire. She explained that she "basically jumped on one of their backs and put them in a chokehold—trying to restrain them." Witnesses captured videos showing some of the men kicking at one of the women on the ground while the other struggled to break free. By the time police were alerted and arrived on the scene, the fight had already ended. Officers spoke with one of the men involved, who blamed the fight on the two women. While he provided his ID, the other men refused to cooperate or identify themselves, according to Emma. Halifax Regional Police are still investigating the incident, and no charges have been brought against the attackers. Emma and Tori believe the assailants are between 18 and 24 years old. Emma said police are hoping to obtain CCTV footage, but existing videos taken by witnesses clearly show the men "beating up two girls." The assault left both women with injuries. Tori suffered bruises on her arm and under her eye, while Emma was left with a chipped tooth, a broken nose, and bruises. Recounting the incident, Emma said, "I felt punches and kicks and then I felt it on my nose and there was blood." Despite her training in mixed martial arts, Emma opted to try and restrain one of the attackers rather than throw punches. "I put them in a chokehold," she said, recalling how both she and the man fell to the ground before she let go after "being manhandled." The attack has left Emma and Tori shaken and terrified to return to downtown Halifax. Emma expressed her heartbreak over the incident, especially during Pride Month. "Now people will be terrified to hold their partner's hand walking down the street. It’s just a major setback," she told Saltwire. She believes they were targeted due to their sexuality, noting that one of the men told Tori, "You wish you had a dick." Emma added, "Clearly, they picked her out—she's a more masculine-presenting lady than I am, so I think they thought they had the go ahead—she was fair game for them." Emma shared photos of the men from the night of the attack and pleaded for anyone with information or video footage to come forward. Halifax Regional Police issued a statement emphasizing their commitment to taking incidents "motivated by hate toward a specific group very seriously." They encouraged anyone exposed to offensive, threatening, or intimidating behavior to report it, stating, "Even if the investigation does not find criminal wrongdoing in that specific incident, it is important to have it on record as part of the collective effort to identify trends and prevent violence." Credit: LBC | Daily Mail 2024-07-04 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In a revealing new poll, a significant majority of voters who supported President Joe Biden in the 2020 election believe that his son, Hunter Biden, should serve prison time following his recent conviction on gun charges. Conducted by Redfield & Wilton Strategies, the survey of 2,500 registered voters found that 60 percent believe Hunter Biden deserves a custodial sentence. Among those who voted for Biden, 57 percent echoed this sentiment. Hunter Biden’s legal troubles stem from his conviction by a Delaware jury in June for illegally purchasing a firearm while using drugs, specifically crack cocaine, and lying about his drug use on a government form in May 2018. Despite Hunter’s denials and claims of not being an active drug user at the time, he faces a maximum sentence of 25 years in prison, with his sentencing scheduled no later than October 9. However, some legal experts argue that Hunter Biden might not receive a lengthy prison sentence. David Bredin of the Bredin Law Firm in New York suggested to Newsweek that Hunter might spend around a year in prison, factoring in good behavior and his lack of prior criminal history. "Factoring in good behavior, he will be released early as he has no criminal history, and other guidelines are taken into account," Bredin noted. In addition to the gun charge, Hunter Biden is also set to stand trial in California in September over allegations that he failed to pay $1.4 million in taxes between 2016 and 2019. This series of legal battles comes amid increased scrutiny and accusations from former President Donald Trump, who has claimed that President Biden has “weaponized” the Department of Justice against him to hinder his chances in the upcoming election. Interestingly, the Redfield & Wilton Strategies poll also highlighted broader voter concerns about the justice system. A majority of 58 percent of respondents believe the U.S. justice system is currently being "abused" for political purposes, a view shared by 53 percent of Biden voters. This sentiment reflects the ongoing political tensions surrounding Trump’s legal challenges. Trump, who became the first U.S. president in history to be convicted of a crime after a New York jury found him guilty of 34 counts of falsifying business records on May 30, has consistently denied any wrongdoing. He has labeled the investigation by the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office as a politically motivated "witch hunt" aimed at preventing his 2024 election bid. The poll results indicate mixed voter reactions to Trump's legal issues. About 34 percent of Americans say Trump's hush money conviction makes them more likely to vote for him in November, compared to 29 percent who say it makes them less likely to do so. Furthermore, 31 percent believe Trump's conviction increases his chances of winning the 2024 election, while 29 percent think it diminishes his chances. These findings come amid heightened political drama and legal battles involving both President Biden’s family and Trump. The Supreme Court's recent landmark ruling that Trump is entitled to at least presumptive immunity from prosecution in the federal 2020 election if his actions can be found to be considered "official acts" carried out in office adds another layer to this complex legal and political landscape. Hunter Biden’s situation also continues to evolve, with his legal team maintaining his innocence and disputing the charges. His case has drawn significant public attention not only because of his high-profile father but also due to the broader implications it has for discussions about justice and political bias in the U.S. The Redfield & Wilton Strategies poll, conducted between June 26-28 with a margin of error of plus or minus 1.96 percentage points, provides a snapshot of current voter sentiment amid these ongoing issues. The findings suggest that while there is a considerable appetite for holding Hunter Biden accountable among Biden voters, there is also a pervasive sense of disillusionment with the justice system’s perceived politicization. Credit: Newsweek 2024-07-04 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

As climate change intensifies heatwaves and storms across the United States, the concept of "climate havens" has gained traction. These are cities purported to offer refuge from extreme weather, attracting attention from regions prone to hurricanes, wildfires, and other climate-induced disasters. Among these cities, Buffalo, New York, stands out for its claim of a moderate year-round climate, a notion championed by Mayor Byron Brown in 2019. During a state of the city address, Mayor Brown suggested that Buffalo could be a "climate refuge city," potentially serving as a sanctuary for those fleeing more disaster-prone areas. This idea was eagerly adopted by Invest Buffalo Niagara, a local economic development organization, which marketed the city as a climate haven. Despite expected rises in air and water temperatures, climate scientists do not foresee an increase in weather-related disasters in Buffalo over the coming decades. This optimistic outlook was highlighted on the "Be in Buffalo" campaign website, which touted the city's protection from frequent droughts, unliveable heat, and intense weather-related disasters, as well as its abundant fresh water supply from the Great Lakes. Stephen Vermette, a geography professor at Buffalo State University, supports some of these claims. His research indicates no significant increase in extreme weather events in Buffalo and Western New York. "I really could not find any type of extreme weather [that was increasing] in Buffalo and Western New York," he noted. However, he cautioned against viewing Buffalo as an idyllic sanctuary, stating, "We’re not an oasis, we suck less." Buffalo's reputation for milder weather is not new; it dates back over a century, as evidenced by a 1900s newspaper headline proclaiming, "Buffalo comfortable while other cities of the country swelter." Vermette's conclusions have since been widely circulated in the media, sometimes without a thorough understanding of his underlying research. Buffalo is not alone in its climate haven aspirations. Cities across the upper Midwest and Northeast, such as Duluth in Minnesota, Ann Arbor in Michigan, Madison in Wisconsin, and Burlington in Vermont, have similarly embraced this concept. However, the notion of a climate haven is met with skepticism by climate scientists and experts, who recognize both its potential benefits and significant limitations. Susan Clark, an assistant professor of environment and sustainability at Buffalo State University, has mixed feelings about the climate haven concept. While acknowledging its role in raising awareness about climate change, she stresses the importance of understanding the broader context. "It gets people thinking about it, which is great," Clark says. "The idea of a climate haven can be really hopeful, but people have to understand the whole context." Indeed, climate change is already impacting places like Buffalo. Increased precipitation is causing more frequent flooding, and winter and ice storms can lead to power outages, particularly in cities with aging infrastructure. Buffalo's famous snowfall also poses risks; a 2022 storm that dumped several feet of snow caused major power outages and resulted in over 30 deaths. City leaders are acutely aware of these challenges. Brendan Mehaffy, who heads Buffalo's office of strategic planning, notes that the city is conducting a coastal resiliency study related to flooding and has adjusted its budget to address increasingly intense precipitation events. "I think the term 'haven' is very misleading," says Julie Arbit, a researcher at the Center for Social Solutions at the University of Michigan. "A better term might be a 'climate adaptation zone.'" For cities to truly serve as climate refuges, significant investment in infrastructure is essential to accommodate new residents and adapt to the changing climate. Failure to do so could exacerbate inequalities, displacement, and gentrification. For example, Duluth, Minnesota, has seen an influx of newcomers, raising concerns that rising housing prices may displace local residents. Affordable housing is a potential challenge for Buffalo as well. Like its Midwest peers, Buffalo must invest in adapting to warmer weather and increased precipitation. Mehaffy points out that the marketing campaign was driven by an economic development group, not the city itself. While Buffalo has seen a recent population increase, it is difficult to attribute this solely to climate change. Clark sees an opportunity for Buffalo to address these challenges and improve life for all residents. "It's a great opportunity for us to try to tackle and try to face some of these challenges," she says. "There's still a lot of work to be done here to make life better here for everyone." Despite the marketing efforts, it remains unclear if a significant number of Americans are relocating to these so-called climate havens. Migration data shows that most Americans move within their region or state, rather than across state lines or the country. This suggests that the real climate havens might be the "safer" zones within metropolitan areas, rather than entirely new cities. Jeremy Porter, a demographer and head of climate implications research at First Street Foundation, has studied how climate change influences relocation. He notes that residents are more likely to move to drier neighborhoods within their city rather than relocate entirely. Extreme weather events like hurricanes are seen as rare, making permanent relocation less likely. "There will be people that do take this kind of information and do relocate, but I can't see a world in which it’s a macro trend," Porter says. In the coming decades, Porter predicts significant migration within regions or metropolitan areas, but does not foresee a major shift to entirely new cities. "We're going to see a lot of the same as we see now," he concludes. As the climate crisis continues to unfold, the concept of climate havens may offer a glimmer of hope. However, it is crucial to approach this idea with a clear understanding of its limitations and the necessary steps for adaptation. Only then can these cities potentially provide a viable refuge from the increasing threats posed by climate change. Credit: BBC 2024-07-04 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Dr. Anthony Fauci, the former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), recently shared details of a conversation he had with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., an independent presidential candidate known for his controversial views on vaccines. This discussion was highlighted during Fauci's appearance on "The Axe Files with David Axelrod" podcast. Fauci recounted a meeting with Kennedy Jr., where Kennedy claimed he would lead a commission on vaccines under Trump's administration. During the meeting, Kennedy presented a slide claiming vaccines were responsible for numerous diseases, including autism. Fauci immediately challenged Kennedy, stating, "Excuse me, Bobby, but I don't really mean to interrupt you but there isn't a bit of evidence at all of anything that's on this slide." Fauci and his colleagues concluded the meeting by telling Kennedy Jr., "Bobby I'm sorry, but we don't really agree with you." Afterward, Fauci approached Kennedy Jr. and expressed his concern, "Bobby, I believe you care about children and you care that you don't want to hurt them but you got to realize from a scientific standpoint, what you're saying does make no sense." Fauci added his personal observation, "I don't know what's going on in his head but it's not good." Kennedy Jr., a prominent critic of vaccines even before the COVID-19 pandemic, reiterated his stance during a 2023 appearance on "The Joe Rogan Experience" podcast. He spoke about friends whose children had adverse reactions to vaccines, asserting that healthy children lost their abilities after vaccination. Recently, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected two appeals cases related to the COVID-19 vaccine brought by the Children's Health Defense, a nonprofit founded by Kennedy Jr. Despite these legal setbacks, Kennedy Jr. remains an active independent candidate in the 2024 election. He has expressed openness to discussions with Democrats about potentially replacing President Joe Biden as the Democratic nominee, stating in an interview with NewsNation's Chris Cuomo that he would consider such talks to avoid efforts by the Democratic National Committee to remove him from the ballot. Credit: Newsweek 2024-07-04 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe