Social Media

The Scottish National Party (SNP), long dominant in Scotland's political landscape, is facing a significant shift in public sentiment. Recent events and public outcry suggest that the electorate is growing weary of the SNP's excuses and mismanagement, especially in critical areas like education and healthcare. During a recent BBC debate among Scotland’s political leaders, the frustration of Scottish voters was palpable. John Swinney, the SNP leader and First Minister of Scotland, faced harsh criticism from citizens who accused him of deflecting responsibility and blaming external factors for the SNP's failures. A Glasgow mother voiced her frustration directly, saying she was "sick" of Swinney blaming everyone else for issues that fall under the SNP's jurisdiction, such as education and health. Her comments resonated with many viewers, highlighting a growing discontent with the SNP's governance. Adding to the criticism, a young man from the audience expressed his anger at the state of the economy, noting the boarded-up businesses and increasing number of beggars in the streets. He condemned the SNP's focus on independence while failing to address pressing local issues. Swinney’s attempts to defend his party's record by blaming deficiencies on the British government or other parties fell flat in the face of these pointed critiques. The debate illustrated a broader shift in public opinion. As Swinney struggled to deflect blame, the public's dissatisfaction became increasingly clear. Opinion polls suggest that the SNP could face a significant defeat in the upcoming July 4 election. This potential downturn mirrors the political embarrassment experienced by Gordon Brown in 2010 when he was caught on camera dismissing a concerned voter as "bigoted." In the debate, Swinney was confronted with the harsh reality of public opinion. The Glaswegian mother demanded accountability for the SNP’s failures, particularly in education and healthcare, which are fully devolved to the Scottish government. Her demand for a direct answer underscored the frustration felt by many Scottish parents: "We’re sick of hearing it’s Westminster’s fault that education is in crisis. We want to know what you and your party are going to do to fix what’s happening in education right now." When Swinney attempted to sidestep her criticism, she forcefully interjected, "Stop passing the buck." Swinney's assertion that Scottish independence would enable him to address these issues was met with skepticism. Despite his description of independence as a "beautiful proposition," the public and his critics saw this as another evasion. One audience member quipped, "Tidy the flat before you move out, John," suggesting that the SNP should address current issues before pursuing independence. Political opponents, including Douglas Ross of the Scottish Tories and Anas Sarwar of Scottish Labour, seized the opportunity to highlight Swinney’s deflection tactics. They argued that with full control over education and the NHS, the SNP had no excuse for their failures. The debate also featured a contentious appearance by Lorna Slater of the Greens, who, instead of presenting clear alternatives, delivered what was perceived as a confused and noisy rant. Her performance did little to bolster her party's standing and may have alienated potential voters. As the July 4 election approaches, traditional SNP voters may be reconsidering their support. The debate underscored a significant shift in public sentiment, with increasing numbers of Scots demanding accountability and effective governance. The SNP’s focus on independence, while neglecting critical domestic issues, appears to be losing its appeal among a populace tired of excuses and eager for tangible improvements in their daily lives. The outcome of the election could mark a turning point in Scottish politics, signaling a decline in the SNP’s dominance and a demand for more accountable and effective leadership. As voters prepare to cast their ballots, the message is clear: it’s time for the SNP to address the real issues facing Scotland and take responsibility for their governance. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-06-14 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Antisemitic vandals targeted the home of Brooklyn Museum director Anne Pasternak, defacing her co-op in Brooklyn Heights with disturbing symbols and messages. The most prominent of these was a red triangle painted on her front door, a symbol widely used in Hamas propaganda to mark targets for death. Photos from the scene show the red inverted triangle, a symbol that has gained notoriety since November 2023 following Hamas' attack on Israel on October 7 and Israel's subsequent retaliatory actions. The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) has documented that this symbol appeared in Hamas' al-Qassam Brigades propaganda videos to signify Israeli soldiers marked for targeted attacks. In these videos, the red triangle would follow a target, who would then be struck by a sniper's bullet, a rocket-propelled grenade, or another deadly weapon. The red triangle has since been adopted more broadly in anti-Zionist memes and political cartoons, where it symbolizes Hamas and glorifies violence against Israelis. The ADL notes that it can sometimes appear innocuously in general pro-Palestinian social media posts, but its use has become increasingly linked to calls for violence. Protesters have used the symbol over images of Israeli soldiers or the Star of David to call for further violent resistance. In addition to the red triangle, vandals scrawled antisemitic and anti-Zionist messages on Pasternak's home, including "Anne Pasternak Brooklyn Museum White Supremacist Zionist" and "You have blood on your hands." Other Jewish board members of the Brooklyn Museum were similarly targeted. New York City Mayor Eric Adams condemned the vandalism, asserting that it was not a case of peaceful protest or free speech but a crime of overt, unacceptable antisemitism. "This is a crime, and it’s overt, unacceptable anti-Semitism," Adams said in a statement. He apologized to Pasternak and vowed to bring those responsible to justice. Jewish leaders in New York have drawn parallels between the current rise in antisemitism and the atmosphere of the 1930s in Nazi Germany. Michael Nussbaum, former president of the Queens Jewish Community Council, warned, "We are experiencing and seeing the Nazi playbook come to life in 2024." He emphasized the concerted effort to marginalize Jewish identity from public life, reminiscent of tactics employed by the Nazis. Matthew Schweber, a lawyer with the Columbia University Jewish Alumni Association, likened the actions of the pro-Palestinian movement in New York to the Ku Klux Klan, asserting that such protests engage in targeted harassment and incitement of violence. "These protests are not protected under the First Amendment because they are engaged in targeted harassment and incitement of violence," Schweber said. Brooklyn Councilwoman Inna Vernikov, a Jewish Republican, highlighted the increasing boldness of antisemitic behavior, expressing fear for the safety of Jewish residents. "It’s a scary time for the Jews," she said. She criticized the weak leadership that has allowed such behavior to escalate, questioning, "What’s next? We’re going to see Jews killed in the streets?" Recent incidents in New York have underscored this growing threat. Protesters in Union Square unfurled a banner reading "Long live October 7," and anti-Israel agitators have harassed Jews, telling them they wished "Hitler was still here." Vandals also splattered red paint on the homes of Jewish board members, and masked protesters have taken over subway cars, demanding that "Zionists" reveal themselves and leave. Jewish leaders are now calling for the reinstatement of New York's anti-mask law, previously used to combat the Ku Klux Klan, to strip violent protesters of their anonymity. Assemblyman Michael Reilly has introduced legislation to reinstate the mask ban, arguing that it is essential to prevent mobs from inciting fear and violence without facing consequences. The rise in antisemitic hate crimes in New York has been alarming, with a 150% increase in May compared to the same month last year, according to NYPD crime statistics. The total number of anti-Jewish hate crimes recorded this year has already surpassed those in the same period in 2023. This disturbing trend has prompted urgent calls for action to protect Jewish New Yorkers and combat the escalating tide of antisemitism. Credit: NYP 2024-06-14 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

A link to a site that publishes false stories and promotes anti-GMO propaganda. has been removed. The topic here is: UN Security Council Approves US-Led Ceasefire Plan for Israel-Gaza Conflict Please stay on topic if you want your post to remain. Additional posts removed including a reply with multiple nested quotes and no comments. Another off topic post removed, along with a comment on moderation.

A number of hate speech posts have been removed along with replies.

New Topics: Harrowing Captivity: The Ordeal and Rescue of Hostages Held by Hamas https://aseannow.com/topic/1329625-harrowing-captivity-the-ordeal-and-rescue-of-hostages-held-by-hamas/ U.N. Blacklists Israel and Hamas Over Grave Violations Against Children https://aseannow.com/topic/1329631-un-blacklists-israel-and-hamas-over-grave-violations-against-children/

Post removed for contravening community standards and inflamatory remarks

On June 11, U.S. President Joe Biden was seen embracing his grandson, Beau Biden, accompanied by his daughter-in-law, Melissa Cohen Biden, and his son, Hunter Biden. Earlier that day, Hunter was found guilty on all three counts in his criminal gun charges trial. Despite the potential political fallout, President Biden made no effort to interfere with the prosecution, allowing his Justice Department to secure a guilty verdict that could lead to jail time for Hunter, a recovering addict. The president stated, “I will accept the outcome of this case and will continue to respect the judicial process as Hunter considers an appeal.” Biden has already indicated that he won’t pardon his son. In his initial response to the verdict, Hunter Biden refrained from attacking the judge or prosecutors. Instead, he expressed gratitude for the love and support of his family and relief at being clean again. This demeanor contrasted sharply with Trump’s reaction to his own trial and conviction nearly two weeks prior in his hush money case. Trump lashed out at witnesses, prosecutors, jurors, and the judge, claiming, “This was done by the Biden administration in order to wound or hurt a political opponent.” He dismissed the verdict as a “rigged decision,” despite the Justice Department’s non-involvement in the Manhattan district attorney’s case. Trump has since been vocal about using presidential powers to punish his political adversaries and manipulate the legal system if he regains office. In a conversation with TV psychologist Phil McGraw, Trump justified revenge, saying, “Sometimes revenge can be justified. I have to be honest. You know, sometimes it can.” He also told Fox News, “I would have every right to go after them,” referring to the Bidens. Discrediting Trump's Claims with Hunter Biden's Verdict Trump has repeatedly claimed that he cannot receive a fair trial in predominantly Democratic areas like Manhattan. Yet, Delaware, a blue state, saw a jury convict the president’s son. One juror told CNN that politics never influenced their deliberations. In Trump’s trial, jurors have remained silent, possibly due to fears of identification following Trump’s intimidation tactics. A guilty verdict against Hunter Biden in a blue state challenges the narrative that a biased justice system unfairly targets Trump. Joe Biden’s commitment to the independence of the Justice Department, as promised during his campaign, stands in stark contrast to Trump’s vow to weaponize the legal system against political opponents if re-elected. Trump has openly declared his intentions to prosecute the Bidens and dismantle what he calls the “Deep State.” Michael Zeldin, a former senior Justice Department official, highlighted on CNN Max that the Hunter Biden conviction disproves Trump’s claims of a weaponized legal system targeting Republicans. “So much for the weaponization of the Justice Department to go after just the enemies of the other side,” Zeldin said. He emphasized that the Justice Department, under Attorney General Merrick Garland, is striving to act impartially and bring worthy prosecutions to trial. The perception of Justice Department neutrality was further reinforced by comments from David Weiss, the Trump-appointed U.S. attorney in Delaware. Elevated to special counsel by Garland to avoid the impression of political bias, Weiss thanked the attorney general for allowing him to operate independently. He stated, “No one in this country is above the law. Everyone must be accountable for their actions, even this defendant.” However, Weiss also emphasized that “Hunter Biden should be no more accountable than any other citizen convicted of this same conduct.” The Political and Legal Implications Hunter Biden’s conviction and the impending tax trial in September, along with other high-profile Democratic prosecutions, challenge the notion that the Justice Department exclusively targets Republicans. Democratic Senator Robert Menendez of New Jersey is on trial for bribery and corruption, and in May, the Justice Department indicted Democratic Representative Henry Cuellar of Texas and his wife for allegedly accepting around $600,000 from Azerbaijan’s state-owned oil firm and a Mexican bank in exchange for official acts as a member of Congress. Both Democrats maintain their innocence. Despite these facts, House Republicans are set to vote on holding Garland in contempt of Congress for refusing to release President Biden’s interview recordings with former special counsel Robert Hur. Biden has invoked executive privilege over these files. The GOP Narrative and Political Reality Democratic Representative Jamie Raskin contrasted Trump’s and Biden’s responses to legal scrutiny, pointing out that Republicans attack the justice system when dissatisfied with outcomes, whereas Democrats accept legal processes even when unfavorable. “The Republicans are attacking our entire system of justice and the rule of law because they don’t like the way one case came out. Whereas the son of the president of the United States is prosecuted and I don’t hear a single Democrat crying foul,” Raskin noted. Nevertheless, inconvenient truths often fail to penetrate the Republican echo chamber. Trump’s supporters in Congress used Hunter Biden’s conviction to spin new conspiracy theories rather than reassess their narrative. House Oversight Chairman James Comer called the Delaware trial “a step toward accountability” but accused Justice Department officials of covering for President Biden. Comer reiterated unfounded claims that Joe Biden profited from Hunter’s business dealings in Ukraine and China during his vice presidency, despite a lack of evidence from his committee and the House GOP impeachment probe. House Speaker Mike Johnson echoed this sentiment, vowing continued investigations into the Bidens’ business dealings. Stephen Miller, Trump’s former White House adviser, suggested that the Justice Department showed favoritism toward Hunter by not charging him with more severe crimes and proposed coercing him into testifying against his father. Some GOP reactions were outright bizarre. Georgia Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene speculated baselessly on X (formerly Twitter) that Hunter’s conviction was a plot to balance the scales of justice while ignoring other alleged Biden crimes. The Stakes of November’s Election The contrasting responses to these legal battles underscore the significant stakes of the November election. Princeton University history professor and CNN political analyst Julian Zelizer highlighted that voters must decide what kind of leadership they want in the Oval Office. “Not only is [Joe Biden] saying, the decision is also one that comes from the courts, he’s not saying he’s going to use presidential power to somehow issue a pardon. And you contrast that with the former president who’s attacked the legal system. He’s questioned its legitimacy,” Zelizer stated. He added, “Voters will have to make a choice. What kind of response do they want? And what kind of person do they want in the Oval Office come January of 2025?” Credit: CNN 2024-06-13 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

On June 12, the United Nations released its annual Children in Armed Conflict report, marking a significant development by including Israel and Hamas on the blacklist for the first time. The report highlights a disturbing 155% surge in "grave violations" against children within the Israel-Hamas conflict, identifying both parties as perpetrators of severe rights abuses against minors. The report, set to be published on Thursday, specifically calls out the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) for the killing and maiming of children, along with attacks on schools and hospitals. Conversely, it accuses Hamas and Islamic Jihad of killing, injuring, and abducting children. U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres described the conflict as having an "appalling, dramatic increase and unprecedented scale and intensity of grave violations against children," with the children in Gaza bearing the brunt of the suffering. Guterres expressed his profound disturbance over the "brutal acts of terror" against children carried out by Palestinian armed groups during the October 7 attacks, which resulted in 38 children killed and 42 taken hostage. He emphasized the importance of investigating reports of sexual violence. The report indicates that "some 19,887 Palestinian children were reported killed or maimed" in Gaza and the West Bank, though it notes that these numbers had not been verified. However, the U.N. has corroborated over 8,000 serious violations against 4,247 Palestinian children and 113 Israeli children in 2023 alone. It is also processing a backlog of 2,000 cases involving reports of killed and injured children. The majority of these incidents were attributed to the use of explosive weapons in populated areas by Israeli armed and security forces. Additional violations were attributed to unidentified perpetrators (58), Israeli settlers (51), Islamic Jihad (21), lone Palestinians (13), and the Palestinian Authority Security Forces (one incident). The pre-release of the report to Israeli officials sparked a furious reaction. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu condemned the U.N.'s decision, stating, "The U.N. has put itself on the blacklist of history when it joined the supporters of the Hamas murderers. The IDF is the most moral army in the world and no delusional decision by the U.N. will change that." Israeli ambassador to the U.N., Gilad Erdan, echoed this sentiment on social media, denouncing the inclusion of the IDF alongside groups known for harming children as "simply outrageous and wrong." Erdan argued that Hamas uses children as tools for terrorism and schools and hospitals as military compounds. He accused the U.N. Secretary-General of incentivizing and encouraging terrorism, motivated by hatred towards Israel. The U.N. report frames these breaches by Israel and Hamas within a broader context of widespread child rights violations in global conflicts. This includes significant violations in Ukraine and Sudan, with an overall 21% increase in grave violations against children. The Sudanese Armed Forces and the rival Rapid Support Forces were also blacklisted for killing and injuring children, attacking schools and hospitals, and in the case of RSF, for using child soldiers and committing sexual violence. Violations against children in Sudan have escalated nearly five-fold since the civil war erupted in April 2023. Russia's armed forces and affiliated groups were listed for the second consecutive year due to their actions in Ukraine, where they were responsible for the deaths of 80 Ukrainian children and the maiming of 419, primarily through the use of explosive weapons. The U.N. Security Council is scheduled to discuss the report on June 26. Blacklisted governments and groups can potentially have their names removed by developing and implementing a plan to address and rectify these violations. Credit: UPI 2024-06-13 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In just three years, Stephen Watson, the Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police (GMP), has transformed a beleaguered force into one of the UK's most improved, according to the official police watchdog. Watson, 55, who describes his leadership style as "back-to-basics," has focused on fundamental policing principles and earned praise from former Conservative home secretaries Priti Patel and Suella Braverman, as well as current Home Secretary James Cleverly. This acclaim comes despite his appointment by Labour's Andy Burnham, the Greater Manchester mayor who dismissed Watson's predecessor. Watson’s strategy, which emphasizes getting officers back on the beat, has garnered attention from both political sides, fueling speculation that he might eventually become Britain's most senior officer, the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police. His tenure has not been without challenges, including navigating the complex investigation into Angela Rayner, the deputy Labour leader, and addressing the fallout from GMP’s wrongful conviction of Andrew Malkinson, who spent 17 years in prison for a crime he did not commit. Meeting Watson in his office on the fourth floor, adorned with a portrait of Elizabeth II and views of the city skyline, it's clear he embodies a disciplined, military-like presence. Wearing his full police uniform, Watson shares his vision and recounts the transformation of GMP with precise statistics. When he took charge in the summer of 2021, GMP was in "special measures" for failing to record 80,000 crimes—nearly a fifth of that year's total. Emergency response times were the worst in the country, and the force faced severe criticism for its handling of domestic abuse and sexual assault cases. Under Watson's leadership, every crime is now investigated, emergency response times have improved significantly, and arrests for domestic abuse have doubled within a year. Overall crime has decreased by 7.7%. The number of stop-and-searches has quadrupled to 46,029 in a year, contributing to significant reductions in robberies, firearms offenses, and knife injuries. "It is about leadership and having an effective plan," Watson asserts, detailing the force’s successes: "In 12 months, neighborhood crime is down 15.4%, burglary is down 24 points, vehicle crime is down 16.2%, robbery is down 11.2%, theft from the person is down 3.9%." Watson’s philosophy involves shifting the force from a reactive to a proactive stance on crime. "We pick up the phone, we get to people quickly, we make accurate records, we investigate all reasonable lines of inquiry. We bring people to justice," he explains. He emphasizes focusing on tangible crime-fighting measures rather than what he sees as distractions from "woke" causes and social media. "Whether it be through adulterating the uniform with pins and badges and having all manner of florid social media accounts—these are all things that I don’t think have a place in policing," Watson states. His approach recalls the "broken windows" theory of policing, advocating for addressing minor offenses to prevent more serious crimes. "I expect my officers to enforce moving traffic offenses, litter and graffiti, right the way up through the spectrum. It’s as much about the small stuff as it is about the big stuff," Watson explains. He believes neglecting minor crimes leads to broader societal decay, exemplified by Manchester's Cheetham Hill district, which he transformed from the counterfeit capital of the UK into a safer area through rigorous enforcement and multiple raids. Watson and his deputy chief constable Terry Woods recently completed their annual strategy briefings with over 5,000 staff members, outlining their vision for the year. These meetings, initially termed “giants” to symbolize awakening the "sleeping giant" of GMP, have now dropped the "sleeping" part, reflecting the force's revitalization. Part of their success stems from connecting with frontline officers and emphasizing a return to professionalism, including strict dress codes and smart uniforms. "If you turn up to work, if you’re a female officer, you tie your hair up, if you’re a man you’ve had a shave, you press your clothing, you polish your boots, you look smart, and you look professional. We’re very uncompromising on that," says Watson. His leadership style is influenced by his family’s military background. Watson, originally from Warrington, grew up in Rhodesia where his father was a naval officer before the family returned to Britain in 1981. Initially considering a career in the Navy, he was persuaded to join the police by two GMP officers he met in Manchester. Watson joined Lancashire Constabulary in 1988 and steadily rose through the ranks, eventually becoming a key staff officer to Pauline Clare, the first female chief constable in Britain. His experience in this role provided him with invaluable insights into managing a police force. Watson's career trajectory includes significant roles such as chief superintendent in Merseyside, where he handled one of the toughest areas of the city, and a commander in the Met Police, where he played key roles in operations like the Vauxhall helicopter crash response and restoring public confidence after the 2011 riots. He then served as deputy chief constable in Durham, the best performing force in England and Wales, before transforming the "failing" South Yorkshire force into one of the most improved in the country. A dedicated family man, Watson maintains a base in Lancashire with his wife, Jane, and their two adult children. His unpretentious nature and loyalty have earned him respect within the force. "He doesn’t try to be something he’s not," says Deputy Chief Constable Woods. Watson's tenure at GMP began with the force ranked 43rd out of 43 in performance ratings. Today, GMP boasts some of the fastest 999 response times and improved crime-solving rates. "We are midway through a journey. We aspire to be outstandingly good at serious and organized crime, neighborhood policing, and child protection," Watson states, aiming to sustain GMP’s momentum amid tightening budgets and economic challenges. Watson’s ultimate goal is for GMP to be recognized as the most improved force in the country for the third consecutive year, a testament to his effective leadership and commitment to fundamental policing principles. Credit: Daily Telepgraph 2024-06-13 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

A recent survey from the British Social Attitudes (BSA) has revealed a significant shift in public opinion regarding transgender rights in the UK. Nearly half of Britons now believe that transgender people should not be allowed to change the sex listed on their birth certificates. This figure has more than doubled since 2019, indicating a notable change in societal perspectives over a relatively short period. In 2019, only 24 percent of respondents were opposed to the idea of altering the sex on birth certificates. In contrast, more than half (53 percent) supported the right of transgender individuals to make such changes. Today, that support has drastically decreased, with just over a quarter (26 percent) agreeing that a transgender person should be able to change the sex recorded on their birth certificate. This shift comes amid ongoing debates and political discussions surrounding gender identity and transgender rights. Political and Social Context The change in public opinion coincides with recent political developments and discussions. Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has pledged to amend the Equality Act to define "sex" explicitly as "biological sex." This move aims to protect women’s spaces such as lavatories and changing rooms. Sunak has emphasized that “someone’s sex at birth should define whether the law sees them as male or female.” This proposal is part of the Conservative manifesto, which was launched recently and seeks to provide clarity on the legal definitions of sex and gender. The Cass Report and Its Implications The publication of the Cass report earlier this year has also influenced public attitudes. The report concluded that children who believe they are transgender should not be rushed into medical treatments that they may later regret. This cautious approach to gender identity in children has sparked further debate and likely contributed to the shifting perspectives highlighted by the BSA survey. Political Debate and Its Impact on Public Opinion The National Centre for Social Research (NCSR), which commissioned the survey, suggested that the intense political debate on gender self-identification has played a role in changing public attitudes. The survey found that nearly half of Britons (47 percent) believe that efforts to ensure equal opportunities for transgender people have gone too far, while 22 percent think they have not gone far enough. This represents a significant change since the question was first introduced in 2021, when about a third of people felt that efforts had gone too far, and another third believed they had not gone far enough. Trust in Government and Politicians at an All-Time Low The survey also highlighted a record low in public trust toward the government and politicians. Forty-five percent of respondents stated that they “almost never” believe that governments prioritize the needs of the country over internal party interests. This distrust is the highest recorded since 2009, following the MPs’ expenses scandal. Additionally, 58 percent of respondents said they “almost never” trust politicians to tell the truth when facing challenging situations, marking a 19-point increase from 2020. Polling expert Professor Sir John Curtice commented on these findings, noting that the next government will need to address the concerns of a public that is increasingly skeptical about the trustworthiness and efficacy of the country's system of government. The findings from the British Social Attitudes survey reflect a significant shift in public opinion on transgender rights and broader political trust issues in the UK. With nearly half of the population now opposing changes to birth certificate sex markers for transgender individuals and a substantial portion believing that efforts for transgender equality have gone too far, it is clear that these issues will continue to be hotly debated. As political leaders navigate these complex and contentious topics, they will also need to rebuild public trust in their ability to govern effectively and honestly. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-06-13 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

The UK economy experienced zero growth in April, according to the latest figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS). This stagnation has provided ammunition for the Labour and Liberal Democrat parties, who argue that the Conservative government's economic strategies are failing. The ONS report highlighted that heavy rainfall, marking the wettest April in 12 years, contributed to a decline in retail sales and construction output, significantly impacting the overall GDP. The report revealed that GDP growth in April was flat, a sharp contrast to the 0.4% increase recorded in March. This outcome aligns with predictions from a Reuters poll of economists, who had anticipated a 0% growth due to the adverse weather conditions. The ONS data showed UK rainfall at 155% of the long-term average for April, leading to a 1.4% decline in construction output. This decline was also influenced by poor demand for construction products in the manufacturing sector. Production saw a 0.9% drop, while the services sector, which accounts for nearly 80% of the UK’s total output, grew by just 0.2%. Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s narrative of an improving economy has been called into question by these figures. The UK had just emerged from a brief recession at the end of 2023, with 0.6% growth recorded in the first quarter of the current year. However, expectations for the second quarter are more modest, with economists predicting around 0.3% growth, half the rate achieved between January and March. The general election set for July 4 looms large, with these economic indicators likely to play a significant role in campaign narratives. Shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves criticized the Conservative government, stating, "Rishi Sunak claims we have turned a corner, but the economy has stalled and there is no growth. These figures expose the damage done after 14 years of Conservative chaos." Reeves outlined Labour’s plan to grow the economy by bringing back stability, unlocking private sector investment, and reforming the planning system. She dismissed the Conservative's approach as "more of the same," describing it as a "desperate wish list of unfunded spending promises that will mean £4,800 more on people's mortgages. Rishi Sunak's plan is a recipe for five more years of Tory chaos." Liberal Democrat Treasury spokeswoman Sarah Olney echoed these sentiments, arguing that the lack of growth in April showed the Conservatives had "utterly failed" to deliver on their promises. "As Rishi Sunak's time as prime minister peters out, so does the UK's economic growth," she said. Olney criticized the Conservatives for presiding over stagnation and economic misery for hardworking families across the country, stating, "The Conservatives' manifesto shows they simply lack the ambition and vision to get the economy moving again. It's clear for voters across the country that the only way to make it happen is to vote them out of office on July 4." Chancellor Jeremy Hunt remained optimistic despite the disappointing figures. He insisted, "There is more to do, but the economy is turning a corner and inflation is back down to normal." Hunt emphasized that the Conservatives would continue to "keep the economy growing with our clear plan to cut taxes on work, homes and pensions." Looking ahead, the economic projections for the rest of the year remain cautious. Yael Selfin, chief economist at KPMG UK, suggested that there could be renewed momentum in the coming months, supported by an improvement in consumer sentiment as pay growth remains strong. She noted that the early summer general election could help resolve political uncertainties, potentially providing a boost for business investment. However, Selfin warned that whichever party wins the election will have to contend with several supply-side challenges that will constrain the UK's long-term growth potential. She predicted that economic activity would remain sluggish in historical terms this year, with growth expected to be just 0.5%. As the election approaches, the latest economic data will undoubtedly fuel further debate and scrutiny of the Conservative government's policies, with opposition parties seizing every opportunity to highlight what they see as the failures of the current administration. The electorate will have to weigh these arguments carefully as they decide which party can best navigate the UK through its current economic challenges. Credit: Sky News 2024-06-13 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In a significant move, the North Carolina House of Representatives has passed a revised mask ban, targeting protesters and significantly impacting the public's ability to wear masks on private property. The legislation, passed with a vote of 69 to 43, now awaits the decision of Democratic Governor Roy Cooper. Despite modifications that permit medical or surgical masks to prevent the spread of contagious diseases, the bill has sparked considerable debate and concern among various groups. The bill's journey to the House floor was marked by controversy. Originally introduced to curb the wearing of masks during Pro-Palestinian protests and encampments, it reflects broader tensions surrounding public demonstrations and civil liberties. While the bill allows for certain health exemptions, it also empowers property owners, such as grocery stores and workplaces, to demand the removal of masks if requested. Opponents of the bill have voiced strong objections. Democratic State Representative Maria Cervania highlighted that the bill's narrow focus on contagious diseases neglects those who wear masks for other health reasons, such as allergies or compromised immune systems. Her colleague, Democratic State Representative Pricey Harrison, expressed personal concerns about the impact on individuals with asthma and the potential for racial targeting under the new law. Healthcare professionals have also raised alarms. Dr. Diana Cejas, a pediatric neurologist at the University of North Carolina, emphasized the risks faced by immunocompromised individuals and those with chronic illnesses. She argued that despite legislative assurances, the reality would likely involve increased scrutiny and harassment for those needing to wear masks for health reasons. "Some of our legislators have made the argument that this ban won’t apply to those of us who mask for medical reasons, but I think that we all know that won’t be true," Dr. Cejas said. "We already face scrutiny and outright harassment at times for the ‘crime’ of trying to protect ourselves from illness, particularly us disabled and chronically ill people of color and those with other marginalized identities." The bill's passage comes at a critical time, with a new subvariant of the coronavirus spreading across the United States. This has exacerbated concerns that the mask ban could hinder efforts to curb the virus's spread. The legislation's stipulation that people can be required to remove masks on private property has added a layer of complexity to public health measures, potentially undermining confidence in the state's response to the ongoing pandemic. Provisions in the bill allow for certain exemptions, such as costume masks on Halloween, but these concessions have done little to quell the broader concerns about its impact on public health and civil liberties. The bill's opponents argue that it represents a step backward in protecting vulnerable populations and maintaining public safety. Governor Roy Cooper's decision on whether to veto the bill will be closely watched. However, even if he does veto it, the General Assembly holds the power to override his decision, given the current political composition. This potential override adds another layer of uncertainty and concern for those opposed to the legislation. The revised mask ban reflects broader national debates about public health, civil liberties, and the balance between safety and freedom. As North Carolina navigates these issues, the outcome of this legislation will likely have significant implications for public policy and individual rights in the state. Credit: Mother Jones 2024-06-13 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

An investigation by the Financial Times has uncovered that Ukrainian children, abducted and taken to Russia during the Kremlin's 2022 invasion, have been listed for adoption on Russian government-linked websites. Using advanced image recognition tools, public records, and interviews with Ukrainian officials and relatives of the children, the FT identified and located four such children on the adoption website usynovite.ru. The findings contribute to the growing body of evidence suggesting that Russia's actions constitute war crimes and crimes against humanity. The International Criminal Court, Ukrainian government officials, and legal experts have been scrutinizing these actions, particularly the forced deportation and adoption of Ukrainian children. Among the identified children, one was found with a falsified Russian identity, including a new name and age that did not match their Ukrainian documentation. Another child was shown using a Russianized version of their Ukrainian name, with no mention of their true Ukrainian background. These children, aged between eight and fifteen, were taken from state care homes in regions of Ukraine that fell under Russian control during the invasion. They have been traced to locations in the Tula region near Moscow, the Orenburg region close to the Kazakh border, and occupied Crimea. The investigation also referenced a New York Times report that confirmed an additional seventeen Ukrainian children on the adoption website, all from a children’s home in Kherson. This adds to the grim tally of nearly 20,000 Ukrainian children who Ukrainian authorities estimate have been forcibly taken to Russia since the invasion began in February 2022. Many of these children are still missing. The International Criminal Court has issued arrest warrants for Russian President Vladimir Putin and Maria Lvova-Belova, Russia’s Commissioner for Children’s Rights, accusing them of being criminally responsible for the unlawful deportation of children. The Kremlin has not responded to requests for comment but has consistently denied abducting children, claiming instead that the actions were for their protection—a claim contradicted by substantial evidence. Putin has signed decrees facilitating the fast-track acquisition of Russian citizenship for Ukrainian children, further complicating efforts to return them. Ukrainian officials, charities, and the children’s relatives and guardians face significant challenges in tracking down and retrieving these children, a process that can take months and involve perilous journeys into Russia. Families who have managed to bring their children back recount harrowing experiences of coercion, abuse, and forced assimilation into Russian culture. Children have been reported to suffer from verbal and physical abuse, forced to adopt Russian identities, and denied contact with their relatives. One mother, Svitlana Popova, described her heartbreak upon discovering that her daughter, abducted by Russian soldiers, had been given a forged birth certificate indicating a Russian origin. Wayne Jordash, president of Global Rights Compliance, highlighted that forcibly transferring or deporting children is a war crime. When done as part of a widespread or systematic attack on a civilian population, as in Russia’s actions against Ukraine, these acts also qualify as crimes against humanity. He emphasized that changing children’s identities and putting them up for adoption demonstrates a clear criminal intent. The Financial Times worked closely with the Ukrainian Child Rights Protection Centre (CRPC) to confirm the identities of the children. The CRPC, a state body, is awaiting further confirmation on two more children identified by the FT. The center is actively working with relatives to facilitate the return of these children to Ukraine. Dmytro Lubinets, the Ukrainian parliament commissioner for human rights, underscored that Russia's actions were premeditated, citing documents shared by Ukrainian officials that reveal Kremlin plans for the forced deportation of Ukrainian children. These documents outline a "filtration" process devised ahead of the invasion. Daria Herasymchuk, an adviser and commissioner for children’s rights to the President of Ukraine, characterized Russia’s actions as part of a “well-planned genocide policy.” She emphasized the scale of the crime, noting the large number of kidnapped children. As of June 11, Ukraine has successfully returned at least 389 children from Russia, according to the president’s office. The efforts to return more children continue, with the CRPC and Ukraine’s human rights commissioner’s office working to confirm the identities of dozens more Ukrainian children flagged by the FT. One such child has been located, and plans are underway to bring them back to Ukraine. Credit: Financial Times 2024-06-13 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In an account of extreme adversity and resilience, the recent rescue of hostages Almog Meir Jan, Shlomi Ziv, and Andrey Kozlov from Hamas captivity in Gaza has revealed the severe physical and psychological abuse they endured over eight months. The Wall Street Journal reported on their plight, citing testimonies from relatives, Israeli security, and medical officials. The three men were captured during the violent incursion by Hamas-led terrorists at the Nova music festival in the Reim area on October 7. This attack resulted in the deaths of nearly 1,200 people and the abduction of over 250 hostages. Among the captives, the ordeal of Ziv, Meir Jan, and Kozlov was particularly harrowing. According to the Journal, the hostages were confined to a single dark room for six months. They had no contact with the outside world except through their interactions with their captors. The conditions they faced were severe and brutal. The captors enforced strict rules, and any failure to comply was met with harsh punishments. These punishments included being locked in a bathroom or being buried under blankets in intense heat, which was a form of both physical and psychological torture. The captors also frequently threatened to kill them, instilling a constant sense of fear and hopelessness. They told the hostages that no one would come for them and that nobody cared about them, further exacerbating their mental anguish. Despite these inhumane conditions, the three men found ways to cope and maintain their sanity. They played cards, wrote journals, and taught each other languages—Arabic, Hebrew, and Russian. These activities not only helped pass the time but also forged a close bond among them, which was crucial for their mental survival. The close relationship they developed provided emotional support and a sense of solidarity that kept them going through the darkest times. Their rescue, which took place in central Gaza’s Nuseirat refugee camp, was a complex operation involving Israeli security forces. Along with Meir Jan, Ziv, and Kozlov, Noa Argamani was also rescued. She had been held in a separate location about 200 yards away from the men. The operation was not without casualties. Hamas's government media office claimed that at least 274 people were killed during the rescue, although this figure has not been independently verified and does not distinguish between combatants and civilians. Israel reported that fewer than 100 people were killed, some of whom were civilians. Upon their return, the hostages exhibited signs of severe physical and psychological distress. They were treated at Sheba Hospital near Tel Aviv. Dr. Itai Pessach, who treated the hostages, noted that they had been beaten "almost every day" during their captivity. The hostages were malnourished to the point of muscle atrophy, and their weight had fluctuated significantly due to the stress, fear, and maltreatment they endured. Despite their cheerful demeanor upon rescue, which Dr. Pessach attributed to the adrenaline rush from the operation, the long-term effects of their ordeal were evident. The physical toll of their captivity was apparent. Meir Jan’s uncle, Aviram Meir, observed that his nephew’s skin was pale from months without sunlight. Although the hostages had been allowed to groom themselves in captivity and did not appear emaciated, their overall health was severely compromised. Dr. Pessach remarked on the gravity of their condition, stating, "We’ve heard stories that are beyond anything you can imagine." One particularly uplifting moment during their captivity came on May 11, Almog Meir Jan’s birthday. The hostages were allowed to watch Al Jazeera’s Arabic channel and saw a Tel Aviv hostage rally where Almog’s face was on a poster. This moment gave Almog a renewed sense of hope and reassurance that he had not been forgotten, providing a rare emotional lift during their confinement. "It made him feel he hadn’t been forgotten," said his uncle. The rescue operation has been a source of immense relief for the hostages’ families and friends, yet the trauma of their experience is profound. The Israeli security officials have advised the hostages and their families to avoid discussing the details of their captivity to protect their mental health and ongoing security concerns. Historically, detailed accounts of such experiences emerge only after the hostages have had time to recover and process their trauma. The broader context of the hostage situation remains grim. As of now, it is believed that 116 hostages are still held by Hamas in Gaza. The fates of these individuals are uncertain, with not all of them expected to be alive. Previous operations have led to the release of some hostages and the recovery of several bodies. Since the initial attack, seven hostages have been rescued alive, while the bodies of 19 hostages have been recovered. Tragically, three of these hostages were mistakenly killed during military operations. The IDF has confirmed the deaths of 41 hostages, citing new intelligence and findings from troops operating in Gaza. Additionally, one person remains missing since the October 7 attack, with their fate still unknown. Hamas is also holding two Israeli civilians who entered the Gaza Strip in 2014 and 2015, as well as the bodies of two IDF soldiers who were killed in 2014. The ongoing conflict and the continued captivity of these individuals underscore the complex and perilous nature of the situation in the region. Related Topic: IDF Rescue Four Israeli Hostages in Central Gaza Raid Credit: TOS & WSJ 2024-06-13 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

President Joe Biden is currently favored to defeat Donald Trump in the upcoming 2024 election, according to a forecast model by the polling and forecasting website 538, formerly known as FiveThirtyEight. In a prediction simulation conducted by 538, Biden emerged victorious 53 times out of 100, while Trump won 47 times out of 100. This forecast considers a variety of factors, including adjusted polling averages, economic and political indicators, and demographic data. With less than five months remaining until the 2024 election, Biden and Trump, who is the presumptive Republican nominee, appear to be in a tight race, reminiscent of their previous contest. Biden, at 81 years old, is facing the election with historically low approval ratings and ongoing concerns about his age. On the other hand, Trump is attempting to secure a second term despite becoming the first U.S. president in history to be convicted of a crime, with a New York jury finding him guilty of 34 felony counts in a hush money trial last month. On June 11, 538 published their official forecast for the 2024 election, showing Biden slightly ahead in what is expected to be a close race. The model predicts that Biden has a 53-in-100 chance of winning the election, indicating that he is slightly more likely than Trump to come out on top. Trump, with a 47-in-100 chance, is not far behind, suggesting that the election outcome could still swing either way as November approaches. G. Elliott Morris, a data journalist for 538, explained the forecast's range of realistic Electoral College outcomes: “The range of realistic Electoral College outcomes generated by our forecasting model stretches from 132 to 445 electoral votes for Biden—a testament to how much things could change by November (and how off the polls could be).” Despite Biden's slight lead, Trump is currently just ahead in the polls, particularly in key swing states that could determine the election's outcome. The forecast model also incorporates various economic and political indicators that may favor Biden. Morris noted, "To forecast the election, we rely primarily on polls asking voters whom they support. However, our forecast also incorporates various economic and political indicators that aren't related to polling but can be used to make rough predictions for the election." Historical trends also suggest that incumbent presidents have a better chance when running for reelection. However, predictions can be skewed due to high political polarization, as is currently the case. Historian and writer Varad Mehta highlighted an alternative view on X (formerly Twitter), noting that DDHQ's forecast slightly favors Trump. The difference in predictions lies in their assessments of the key "blue wall" states, with 538 forecasting Biden winning all three and DDHQ predicting Trump victories in Pennsylvania and Wisconsin based on current polling data. Lawyer James Debate commented on the 538 forecast, saying, "Biden narrowly favored to win Presidential election according to 538's new forecast. I've been dunking a lot on 538 this cycle, but this is a surprisingly solid forecast and seems about right for the current polling." He also noted that 538 might be overestimating Kennedy's vote share, suggesting that third-party candidates' support tends to be overrated in polls. 538 plans to rerun its forecast simulator daily until November's election, updating it based on the latest data. This approach aims to provide the most accurate prediction possible as the political landscape continues to evolve leading up to Election Day. Credit: Newsweek 2024-06-13 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

An inflamatory post has been removed contravening community standards

An off topic history lesson has been removed. There are topics around for that including this one for you to discuss at. Why Did Hamas Attack Israel on Oct 7th 2023 a Historical Perspective

New topic: Blinken Asserts Hamas Holds Key to Ceasefire Plan’s Fate https://aseannow.com/topic/1329542-blinken-asserts-hamas-holds-key-to-ceasefire-plan’s-fate

A deeply troubling video has surfaced, showing an anti-Israel protester in New York City expressing profoundly hateful sentiments toward Jewish people. The incident took place during an event in Union Square that was meant to honor the hundreds of victims killed by Hamas during the Oct. 7 Nova Music Festival. The footage, shared on the social media platform X by reporter Luke Tress, captures a man shouting vile remarks at a group of Jewish individuals. In the video, the man waves his arm and yells, “I wish Hitler was still here. He would’ve wiped all you out.” This horrifying statement is repeated as tensions escalate between the groups present at the event. The Union Square exhibit was organized to commemorate the victims of the tragic Oct. 7 attacks. However, it also attracted a counter-protest by the pro-Palestinian group, Within Our Lifetime. The counter-protesters included individuals carrying a disturbing banner that read “Long live October 7th,” a reference to the day of the Hamas attacks, which were condemned internationally for their brutality. The incident highlights the intense and often dangerous nature of current political and ethnic conflicts, spilling over into public demonstrations in major cities. The presence of anti-Israel protesters waving a flag associated with Hezbollah, an Iran-backed terrorist group, further underscores the volatile atmosphere. Public reactions to the video have been swift and severe, with many calling for a strong response to such hate speech. The event in Union Square, intended as a solemn tribute, turned into a stark reminder of the deep-seated animosities that can erupt in public spaces. Authorities and community leaders are likely to face increased pressure to address and mitigate such hateful expressions, ensuring that public demonstrations remain peaceful and respectful. The Union Square incident serves as a chilling reminder of the pervasive and dangerous nature of hate speech and its potential to incite violence and deepen societal divides. Credit: NYP 2024-06-12 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Switzerland’s President Viola Amherd announced on Monday that nearly 90 countries and organizations, including half from Europe, have confirmed their attendance at the Ukraine peace summit hosted by Switzerland this weekend. However, Russia has declined to participate. The summit, taking place in the scenic Bürgenstock resort overlooking Lake Lucerne in the village of Obbürgen, aims to pave a path towards peace 28 months after Russian forces invaded Ukraine. President Amherd emphasized that the summit is focused on humanitarian aid and fostering dialogue rather than propaganda. "This is not about propaganda," Amherd stated. "This is about the basis of humanitarian aid provided by Switzerland, based on fostering peace (and) to provide a platform to initiate a dialogue." Notably, Moscow was not invited to the summit and has indicated that it would not have attended even if invited, as the conference is based on peace proposals from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, which Russia rejects. High-Level Attendance and Notable Absences The summit will see participation from high-ranking officials and top country leaders. About half of the participants will be represented at the head of state or government level, with a handful from organizations like the United Nations. French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, and U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris are among the expected attendees. Harris will be joined by President Joe Biden's national security adviser, Jake Sullivan, as part of the U.S. delegation. Despite 160 invitations being sent out, fewer than 100 have confirmed their participation in the first phase of the peace process. Key developing countries like Turkey, South Africa, and Brazil have not indicated their attendance. India will participate, but the level of representation is not yet clear. Brazil and China have stated they will not attend unless both sides, including Russia, are present at the table. Swiss officials have acknowledged China's position, noting that Beijing has been a top supporter of Russian President Vladimir Putin since the war began. Foreign Minister Ignazio Cassis mentioned that Switzerland is in frequent contact with Moscow regarding the conference. "The question is not whether Russia will be on board, the question is when," Cassis stated, emphasizing Switzerland's understanding that a peace process cannot proceed without Russian involvement. Ukraine's Diplomatic Push Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is expected to attend the summit and has been actively involved in coordinating the event. Zelenskyy has made a diplomatic effort to attract attendees to the summit while accusing China and Russia of attempting to undermine it. The Swiss-hosted conference follows the recent G7 summit in neighboring Italy. Swiss officials aim to set a course toward "lasting peace" in Ukraine, seeking a "common understanding" and developing a "roadmap" for engaging both sides in talks. The summit’s agenda includes nuclear security, humanitarian aid, and food security. Security Measures Swiss authorities have implemented extensive security measures for the event. As many as 4,000 military personnel will be deployed to provide security, support air transportation, and enhance surveillance. Security fencing and steel wire will be rolled out for the event. Officials noted an increase in cyberattacks leading up to the summit but did not provide specific details. In preparation for the summit, Swiss troops have set up a makeshift heliport in a grassy field below a mountain ridge near the resort, with the sound of cowbells clanging in the background. The Swiss-hosted Ukraine peace summit represents a significant effort to address the ongoing conflict and establish a foundation for lasting peace. While the absence of Russia poses a challenge, the participation of numerous nations and organizations underscores the global community's commitment to seeking a resolution to the crisis. Credit: ABC News 2024-06-12 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Gary Lineker, has found himself at the center of yet another controversy following a social media post that condemned Israel's actions in Gaza. This incident has sparked significant backlash, with critics accusing Lineker of violating the BBC’s stringent social media guidelines, particularly given the sensitive timing during the UK election period. The controversy erupted when Lineker shared a post from author James Felton on the social media platform X. Felton's post, made in response to the rescue of four Israeli hostages in central Gaza, included a report accusing Israel of a "massacre" at the Nuseirat refugee camp. Felton wrote, "What kind of f***ed up species can’t look at endless scenes like this and collectively agree what Israel is doing is abhorrent." Lineker shared this post without adding any personal comment. The move quickly provoked a strong reaction. Former Labour minister Lord Austin of Dudley expressed his dismay on the platform, stating, "Four hostages released and this is what Lineker posts. Unbelievable." Although Lineker subsequently deleted the repost, the original tweet remained visible in his Likes column, further fueling the controversy. Lineker, it appears, interpreted the "f***ed up species" phrase as a reference to humanity in general rather than any specific national group. However, to avoid further misinterpretation, he chose to remove the repost while leaving the Like intact. This decision did little to quell the criticism, with a BBC staffer noting, "This repost looks like a clear breach but Gary knows the BBC won’t dare take him off air just before the Euros." The BBC’s social media guidelines, which were revised after a previous incident involving Lineker, permit non-news figures like him more leeway to express political views. However, these guidelines impose stricter rules during election periods, particularly for flagship presenters. These rules stipulate that such presenters must avoid commenting on any issue that is a matter of political debate during the election period. Danny Cohen, a former BBC director of television, was vocal in his criticism. "Gary Lineker has clearly broken the BBC’s strict election guidelines which prevent the corporation’s flagship presenters from expressing opinions on politically contentious subjects during the campaign," Cohen told the i newspaper. He also questioned why Lineker would support a message referring to people with differing views as a "f***ed up species," calling it "very disturbing." Cohen, who has previously accused the BBC of "anti-Israel bias," added, "The BBC’s senior leadership has proven itself unable to control Mr. Lineker. Few in the Jewish community will expect this to change anytime soon." Leo Pearlman, a leading TV producer, echoed Cohen’s sentiments. "Mr. Lineker, in reference to the rescue of four of the Hamas hostages, retweeted the phrase ‘f***ed up species’ in relation to Israel," he said. "Lineker, the highest paid and highest profile BBC presenter, on the eve of the European Championships, continues to take advantage of his bosses’ cowardice." The BBC, approached for comment, did not formally reprimand Lineker but indicated that they "do have conversations with individuals as required." This was not the first time Lineker faced calls for discipline over his social media activity. Previously, he had retweeted an article that called for Israel to be banned from international football tournaments, a post he later deleted. This latest controversy adds to a series of incidents where Lineker's outspoken nature on social media has clashed with the BBC's guidelines. Earlier in the year, when asked if he would adhere to the stricter social media guidelines during election periods, Lineker confidently replied, "I know the guidelines really, really well. I was partly involved in drawing them up." Despite the controversy, Lineker is set to front the BBC’s coverage of Euro 2024, which begins shortly. Given his history of making politically charged comments, Tory sources have indicated that Lineker will be "watched like a hawk" during the tournament, particularly since it coincides with the final three weeks of the UK election campaign. Home Secretary James Cleverly was also critical of Lineker, likening him to a "spoiled child" and a "showman" seeking attention. In an interview with LBC's Andrew Marr, Cleverly dismissed Lineker's comments regarding the D-Day commemorations as "nonsense," stating, "The Prime Minister was at D-Day celebrations over two days. A day in the UK and a day over in Normandy, he met British veterans, spent a huge amount of time with British veterans." He continued, "He said he was wrong to leave that final event, that world leaders’ event, and he has apologized." Cleverly was firm in his stance against Lineker's inclusion in the Conservative Party, despite suggestions from some quarters. "Nigel's made it clear he wants to destroy the Conservative Party and I don’t embrace people that want to destroy my party and hurt the British people," he said, in response to Suella Braverman’s call for Nigel Farage to join the Tories. Earlier in the week, Farage himself had commented on the matter, expressing admiration for Braverman but rejecting the notion of joining the Conservatives "at the moment." Speculation remains that if Farage, currently leading the Reform party, were elected to represent Clacton-on-Sea, he might eventually defect to the Tories depending on the party's future direction. Credit: Inews 2024-06-12 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Rudy Giuliani's mug shot has been released by local officials in Arizona in connection with his indictment on state charges related to the alleged conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election results in the state. The mug shot, released by the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office, marks a significant moment in the ongoing legal saga involving the former New York City mayor and prominent Trump ally. Giuliani, who was served notice of his indictment during a celebration in Palm Beach, Florida, last month honoring his 80th birthday, appeared for booking procedures in Phoenix on Monday. This followed his virtual arraignment on May 21, where he confirmed posting a $10,000 cash bond. Giuliani has pleaded not guilty to the charges. The indictment, issued by a state grand jury in Arizona in April, accuses Giuliani and other aides of former President Donald Trump of conspiracy, fraud, and forgery as part of an effort to overturn President Joe Biden’s electoral victory in the state. Alongside Giuliani, former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and other so-called "fake electors" who supported Trump in 2020 were also charged. Meadows has also pleaded not guilty. In an interview with NBC affiliate KPNX of Phoenix after his court appearance, Giuliani expressed confidence that the case would be dismissed on constitutional grounds. "This is a complete misuse of the criminal process to interfere with the 2024 election," Giuliani stated. When asked if he had any regrets about his actions related to the alleged election interference, Giuliani responded, “Oh, my goodness, no,” adding, “I’m very, very proud of it.” Ted Goodman, a spokesman for Giuliani, defended him in a statement, calling the charges "outlandish" and asserting that Giuliani “will be fully vindicated.” The indictment refers to Trump as “Unindicted Coconspirator 1” but does not charge him. Arizona was one of seven states where alternate electors signed paperwork falsely claiming Trump had won over Biden. This case in Arizona is not Giuliani's only legal battle related to the 2020 election. He also faces charges in Georgia for similar efforts to overturn the election results in that state, where he has likewise pleaded not guilty. Credit: NBC News 2024-06-12 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

The UK Conservative Party is embroiled in a debate over whether Nigel Farage, the leader of the Reform Party, should be allowed to join their ranks. Home Secretary James Cleverly has strongly opposed the idea, likening Farage to a "spoiled child" and dismissing him as a "showman" seeking attention. This stance comes in response to former Home Secretary Suella Braverman's call for the Tories to "embrace" Farage, a suggestion that has sparked significant controversy within the party. Cleverly's rejection of Farage stems from a belief that the latter aims to undermine the Conservative Party. “Nigel’s made it clear he wants to destroy the Conservative Party and I don’t embrace people that want to destroy my party and hurt the British people,” Cleverly stated. He accused Farage of making provocative statements to garner attention, and emphasized that such behavior should not be rewarded. The issue has come to the fore as the Conservatives face the possibility of losing power in the upcoming general election on July 4. Polls indicate a surge in support for the Reform Party since Farage returned as its leader, with some surveys placing the party within two points of the Conservatives. This potential split on the electoral right could significantly benefit the Labour Party, led by Sir Keir Starmer. Farage's recent comments about Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's departure from D-Day commemorations have further fueled the debate. Farage suggested that Sunak “doesn’t understand our culture,” a remark interpreted by some as a veiled reference to the Prime Minister’s race. Farage, however, insisted his critique was aimed at Sunak’s perceived disconnection due to class and privilege. Cleverly dismissed these comments as “nonsense,” defending Sunak’s commitment to honoring veterans over the two-day commemorations. Support for Farage within the Conservative Party is not uniform. While Braverman and former Prime Minister Liz Truss have expressed openness to Farage joining the Tories, other senior figures like Business Secretary Kemi Badenoch oppose his admission. Farage himself has rejected Braverman's invitation "at the moment," though speculation remains about his potential future alignment with the Conservatives, particularly if he is elected to represent Clacton-on-Sea. This internal conflict highlights the broader challenges facing the Conservative Party as it navigates a shifting political landscape. The rise of the Reform Party and Farage’s continued influence pose significant strategic dilemmas for a party already grappling with declining support and the prospect of an electoral defeat. As Cleverly emphasized, the Conservatives are focused on serving the British people, but the question of how to address the Farage factor remains a contentious and unresolved issue within the party’s ranks. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-06-12 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In June 2016, Britain voted to leave the European Union, an event that foreshadowed Donald Trump's unexpected election win a few months later. Fast forward to June 2024, and far-right candidates, sharing Trump’s populist nationalism, anti-immigrant stance, and disdain for globalist institutions, have achieved significant gains in European Union elections. This raises the question: could similar political dynamics benefit Trump in the upcoming US elections? While American voters do not directly follow foreign elections, and the US presidential system differs significantly from European parliamentary elections, there are notable parallels. Trump's victory in 2016 was partly due to the weaknesses of Hillary Clinton's campaign, but it also reflected broader populist sentiments similar to those driving the Brexit vote. Now, President Joe Biden faces a comparable challenge. The European elections demonstrated the efficacy of a message that resonates with public anger over migration, economic pain, and the perceived personal costs of climate change policies. Trump is leveraging these themes in critical battleground states. Lessons from Europe: Incumbents and Economic Discontent One key takeaway from the European elections is that incumbents are particularly vulnerable in times of economic hardship. As Biden heads to the G7 summit in Italy, he joins a group of politically weakened Western leaders. French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz have faced setbacks from far-right parties reminiscent of Europe's darker history. Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's low approval ratings suggest he might not lead his party into the next election. British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak is bracing for a significant defeat in the upcoming general election. Interestingly, Italy's right-wing Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, whose party recently saw significant victories, appears to be one of the more secure leaders. However, Biden's situation is somewhat unique. Unlike a traditional race between an insurgent outsider and an unpopular incumbent, Trump carries his own set of challenges. He has a controversial record as a former president, marked by two impeachments and various legal troubles. Despite this, his populist nationalism continues to find an audience. Contrasting Trends and Potential Counterbalances Populist nationalism is not universally ascendant. Biden's Democratic Party had a surprisingly strong performance in the 2022 midterm elections, countering the "Make America Great Again" narrative. The potential return of Britain's Labour Party next month and Poland’s recent rejection of populist rule also suggest that right-wing dominance is not inevitable. In France, Macron's response to the far-right National Rally’s gains was bold: he dissolved Parliament and called for new elections. The National Rally, evolved from the ultra-right-wing National Front, has never won the presidency, but its leader, Marine Le Pen, has moderated some policies to appeal to a broader electorate. Macron is betting that higher voter turnout in legislative elections might reverse the far-right trend. If the National Rally wins, Macron may have to appoint the young far-right leader Jordan Bardella as prime minister, potentially creating a disastrous government that could undermine Le Pen's future presidential ambitions. Macron's gamble is rooted in his belief in the French people's ability to make the right choice for their future. He framed his decision as an act of trust in democracy, similar to Biden's plea to American voters to protect their democracy. Biden reiterated this message during the 80th anniversary of the D-Day landings in Normandy, standing beside Macron. Implications for the US Election The White House will closely monitor the results of the French elections on July 7, viewing them as a potential indicator for the US political climate. The European far-right surge underscores the volatility and unpredictability of current political dynamics. Biden's ability to counter Trump's populist messaging and address voter concerns about the economy, immigration, and climate change will be crucial in the months leading up to the US presidential election. Credit: CNN 2024-06-12 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken has emphasized that the fate of the Gaza ceasefire plan depends largely on Hamas. Following discussions with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Jerusalem, Blinken noted that Netanyahu reaffirmed his commitment to the ceasefire proposal, which was put forth by President Joe Biden 11 days ago. However, Blinken indicated that the plan's success hinges on Hamas’s response, putting the onus on Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar who has said Hamas will ‘not surrender its guns. However other Hamas leaders expressed "positive signs". In a recent press conference, Blinken expressed optimism over Hamas’s initial response to a UN Security Council resolution that supported President Biden’s ceasefire plan. This resolution recognized Israel’s acceptance of the plan and urged Hamas to follow suit. While Hamas welcomed elements of the resolution, Blinken stressed that a definitive response from the Hamas leadership in Gaza is still lacking. Blinken's comments follow months of confidential ceasefire negotiations, culminating in President Biden’s public announcement of an Israeli "roadmap to an enduring ceasefire and the release of all hostages." The proposed plan involves a six-week initial ceasefire, during which Hamas would release some hostages in exchange for Israel freeing an unspecified number of Palestinian prisoners. A subsequent phase would require Hamas to release the remaining hostages and for Israeli forces to withdraw from Gaza, though the final ceasefire terms would remain subject to further negotiations. Despite Netanyahu’s war cabinet authorizing the plan, he has not publicly endorsed it. The proposal has sparked contention within Netanyahu’s coalition, particularly among far-right ultranationalist ministers who view it as capitulation to Hamas and have threatened to resign if the plan proceeds. Conversely, Hamas is expected to demand clear assurances that the proposal will lead to a full Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and a permanent cessation of hostilities. Thus far, Hamas has not formally responded to the plan. The complexity of the situation is compounded by the fact that the detailed Israeli proposal, reportedly more comprehensive than the summary presented by President Biden, has not been disclosed publicly. This proposal was formulated by Israel’s three-man war cabinet and has faced opposition from some far-right ministers. As part of an extensive diplomatic effort, Blinken’s visit aims to advance the ceasefire proposal. However, significant obstacles remain, and the path to a lasting ceasefire and the resolution of the conflict continues to be fraught with challenges. Related Topics: Biden Announces Israeli Proposal for Lasting Cease-Fire in Gaza US Submits UN Security Council Resolution Supporting Latest Gaza Deal Credit: BBC 2024-06-12 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe