Social Media

Stephen K. Bannon, former advisor to ex-President Donald J. Trump, is making the most of his final days of freedom by rallying fervent supporters of the MAGA movement. Despite being sentenced to a four-month prison term for defying a congressional subpoena, Bannon remains unapologetic and resolute, portraying his imprisonment as an act of patriotism and a testament to his dedication to the cause. On a pleasant Friday evening in Powhatan, Virginia, Bannon arrived to headline a rally for Representative Bob Good, the chairman of the hard-right House Freedom Caucus. This rally, attended by a crowd carrying lawn chairs and blankets, exemplified the kind of grassroots support that Bannon thrives on. With his influential podcast "War Room" serving as a critical platform for his views, Bannon insisted that his impending imprisonment would only bolster his standing within the movement. "This is ‘War Room,’" Bannon proclaimed with pride as he observed the rallygoers. He emphasized that the podcast, which he streams from his Capitol Hill basement for four hours each weekday, would continue to operate even during his absence. "I’m going to need to find some guest hosts to keep it all going in my absence," he admitted. However, Bannon was confident that his imprisonment would only enhance his influence. "There’s no downside," he said. "I served on a Navy destroyer in my 20s in the North Arabian Sea and Persian Gulf. I’m serving in prison in my 70s. Not a bad bookend." Bannon's defiance was palpable as he framed his imprisonment as the ultimate act of patriotism by a dedicated MAGA warrior. "It’s not like I’m out every night; it’s not like it’s going to cramp my social agenda," he remarked. When pressed on whether he should have cooperated with the subpoena, Bannon was unequivocal. "What are you talking about? I’m proud of what I did. I’m proud of the fact that I stood up to Nancy Pelosi." Bannon's primary concern now is the future of the movement he has helped foster. His listeners, whom he refers to as "the posse," rely on his podcast for discussions on various issues, including the alleged theft of the 2020 presidential election, the situation at the southern border, the federal budget, aid to Ukraine, and what he calls the "uniparty" Republicans in Congress. "'War Room' is not a podcast," Bannon declared. "It’s a military command center for the information war, and it will continue to be that." Despite the looming prison term, Bannon remains unfazed. He explained that years of mental preparation through meditation have fortified him for the challenges ahead. "I have a very strict regimen in my life," he said. "Prison will have a routine and tasks, and I’m nothing special, so I will do whatever is required. But there is zero chance I don’t keep ‘War Room’ focused on the only thing that matters: Total victory." The rally in Powhatan, a quiet conservative community surrounded by rolling farmland, was a significant event for Representative Bob Good. Bannon’s presence was particularly notable as Good faces a contentious Republican primary, with Trump endorsing Good's opponent. It was rare for Bannon to campaign for a candidate opposed by Trump, making his support crucial for Good. As Bannon took the stage, he received a standing ovation, greeted as a martyr for the MAGA cause. "Steve Bannon bears in his body, figuratively speaking, the marks of patriotism, freedom," Good said. "He’s literally put it all on the line for the country." Bannon reassured the crowd that his imprisonment was not a setback. "Prison is not going to be that bad," he told them. "It’s just serving my country in a different way! I’m proud of it." Bannon faces additional legal troubles, including accusations by state prosecutors in Manhattan of misusing funds raised for a group supporting Trump’s border wall. His fraud trial is scheduled for later this year. Nevertheless, Bannon remains optimistic, seeing his legal battles as further proof of his importance to the movement. "They’ve made me much bigger than I am," he said of his opponents. "They can’t help themselves. I trigger these guys to a level that other people don’t. President Trump triggers them, but they think he’s too big a target. They can’t get to Lenin, so they want Trotsky." He pointed out the strategic timing of his sentence, suggesting it was intended to silence him ahead of the presidential election. "The timing is to take me off," he asserted. "100 percent." Bannon drew historical parallels, comparing the conservative movement's current challenges to the Allied troops landing on the beaches of Normandy. "My message to people is, ‘Next man up,’" he said. "This happened on 6th of June in Normandy. It’s next man up. They’re going to sentence Trump to prison on the 11th. It’s got to be next man up." He emphasized the importance of self-reliance within the movement, urging his followers to rise to the occasion. "You got to get the training wheels off," he said. As his surrender date approaches, Bannon plans to continue hosting "War Room" and supporting MAGA candidates. He is determined to see his imprisonment as an opportunity for growth for both himself and his followers. "Do ‘War Room’ four hours a day," he said of his plans. "Do more things like this to help people. If July 1 comes and the appeals haven’t come, then I’ll do what I’m ordered to do. I understand how the system works." Bannon remains confident that his podcast will thrive in his absence. "‘War Room’ will be even better," he declared, "while I’m in prison." Credit: New York Times 2024-06-10 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Supreme Court justices have collectively received nearly $5 million in gifts since the early 2000s, with Justice Clarence Thomas being the primary beneficiary. This revelation comes from data released by the watchdog group Fix the Court, ahead of the justices' financial disclosure reports expected on Friday. According to Fix the Court, Justice Thomas has accepted gifts totaling $4,042,286 since 2004, accounting for 193 gifts. The group also reported an additional 126 "likely but not confirmed gifts" for Thomas, highlighting the extensive nature of his acceptance of gifts. Despite this, Thomas reported only 27 of these gifts on his financial disclosures. The data encompasses current and former justices dating back to 2004, tallying their total gift amounts to approximately $4.7 million. This includes Thomas’s significant portion, which makes up almost the entire sum. Fix the Court’s Gabe Roth emphasized the ethical implications of such gift acceptance. "Supreme Court justices should not be accepting gifts, let alone the hundreds of freebies worth millions of dollars they’ve received over the years," Roth said. He argued that public servants, who earn significantly more than the median local salary and can make substantial income from writing books, should be able to afford their own vacations, vehicles, hunting excursions, and club memberships without relying on gifts from wealthy benefactors. Roth also pointed out the potential influence of gift-givers, stating, "The ethics crisis at the court won’t begin to abate until justices adopt stricter gift acceptance rules." The watchdog group's data might even underestimate the true extent of the gifts, as some could not be verified, such as a hunting lodge stay by Justice Antonin Scalia. Scalia, along with Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and William Rehnquist, passed away while in office, which could mean their reported gift totals are undercounts. Scalia received the second-highest total in gifts, amounting to $210,164 from January 2004 until his death in 2016. Justice Samuel Alito, who recently faced calls to recuse himself from cases related to January 6 and former President Trump due to reports of a "Stop the Steal" flag flown outside his house, received the third-most gifts, totaling $170,095 from January 31, 2006, to the present. The disclosure of these gifts highlights the need for greater transparency and stricter ethical guidelines for Supreme Court justices, especially given their significant influence on American law and society. As the public and lawmakers continue to scrutinize the ethical standards of the court, the pressure mounts for reforms that ensure justices remain impartial and free from undue influence. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has recently amended his financial disclosure forms to include previously unreported trips paid for by billionaire Harlan Crow. These amendments reflect trips taken in 2019 to an Indonesian island and an exclusive, secretive club in Northern California. This update follows increased scrutiny and criticism of the ethical standards and financial transparency of the Supreme Court justices. The amended disclosure, made public on Friday, reveals two significant trips from 2019. The first trip, funded by Crow and his wife Cathy, was to Bali, Indonesia. During this trip, Thomas and his wife Ginni spent over a week island-hopping on Crow's superyacht, a journey estimated by ProPublica to exceed $500,000 if the Thomases had covered the expenses themselves. The second trip was to Monte Rio, California, where Thomas stayed at a private club. This location is likely the Bohemian Grove, a highly exclusive, all-male retreat that both Thomas and Crow have reportedly attended. These amendments come after ProPublica initially exposed these trips, marking the first time Justice Thomas has included them in his financial disclosures. His updated filing states that the trips were "inadvertently omitted" from the original disclosure and were corrected following guidance from his accountant and ethics counsel. The latest financial disclosures of the Supreme Court justices provide a rare glimpse into their activities outside the courtroom. These annual reports have garnered heightened interest, particularly regarding the justices' connections with wealthy donors. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, for example, reported receiving four concert tickets valued at about $3,700 from Beyoncé and $10,000 worth of artwork for her chambers from Alabama artist and musician Lonnie Holley. Books continue to be a significant source of outside income for the justices. Justice Jackson reported an advance of $893,750 for her upcoming memoir. Justice Neil M. Gorsuch received a $250,000 book advance, while Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh disclosed a $340,000 advance for his legal memoir. Justice Sonia Sotomayor earned about $87,000 in royalties for her books and reported $1,900 for voicing a character on an animated children's show. Justice Thomas's financial activities have drawn particular scrutiny due to his acceptance of lavish gifts and travel from affluent friends. The 2019 trips, now included in his financial disclosure, reflect this pattern. The Indonesian trip, as reported by ProPublica, involved luxury accommodations and travel aboard a private jet and superyacht provided by Crow. In his latest disclosure, Thomas did not report any gifts or private jet travel for 2023, except for a pair of photo albums valued at $2,000 from Terrence and Barbara Giroux. Mr. Giroux is the departing executive director of the Horatio Alger Association of Distinguished Americans, an exclusive group in which Thomas is a member. Thomas has allowed the association significant access to the Supreme Court, including presiding over an annual ceremony and mentoring scholarship recipients. Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. was granted an extension for his financial disclosure this year, consistent with his typical practice. Over the past decade, Alito has frequently delayed filing his disclosures. Last year, both Thomas and Alito requested and received extensions, with Thomas including an unusual addendum defending his acceptance of gifts from Crow. This statement sought to justify his decision to fly on private jets, citing advice to avoid commercial travel following the leak of the draft opinion overturning Roe v. Wade. However, he did not list any private plane travel for 2023. In response to mounting pressure and intense public scrutiny, the Supreme Court adopted its first ethics code in November. This nine-page code, while not binding in the same way as codes for lower federal courts, advises justices to avoid activities that could detract from the dignity of their position, interfere with their duties, or reflect adversely on their impartiality. However, the absence of specific restrictions on gifts, travel, or real estate deals and the lack of an enforcement mechanism have drawn criticism. Justice Thomas's updated financial disclosure underscores the ongoing debate over the ethical standards and transparency of the Supreme Court justices. The revelations about his trips funded by Crow highlight the intricate ties between justices and wealthy benefactors, raising questions about potential influences on their judicial decisions. Credit: New York Times 2024-06-10 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Recent revelations have cast a shadow over George Galloway's Workers Party of Britain as multiple candidates have been accused of Holocaust denial and anti-Semitism. The Telegraph reported that Julie Lowe, a candidate standing in Chesterfield, has made several controversial comments on social media. Lowe disputed the historical fact that six million Jews were killed in the Holocaust, stating, "It can't possibly be 6m," in response to a post questioning the death toll. She also made derogatory comments about Jewish television presenter Rachel Riley and shared a misattributed photo falsely linking Bill Gates to child traffickers. Another candidate, Kamran Khan, standing in Poplar and Limehouse, east London, reposted a tweet that belittled Holocaust Remembrance Day, calling it a "galactic load of victimhood." The post included a mock pie chart minimizing Jewish casualties in comparison to other World War II casualties. These revelations follow a pattern of anti-Semitic behavior among candidates from the Workers Party of Britain. Last month, The Telegraph revealed that a party candidate was deselected for sharing a video that accused Jews of being punished throughout history for "killing Jesus Christ." The Campaign Against Anti-Semitism has expressed outrage over these incidents. A spokeswoman for the organization stated, "The rhetoric from these candidates is utterly shocking. But every day we seem to uncover new horrors from candidates for the Workers Party of Britain." In response to these allegations, the Workers Party of Britain has been forced to drop some candidates. However, the party and the individuals involved have yet to provide an official comment on the latest accusations. George Galloway, who returned to Parliament by winning the Rochdale by-election in February, has pledged to field hundreds of candidates across the country, but these incidents have raised serious concerns about the party's vetting process and stance on anti-Semitism. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-06-10 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In 2021, a year into the COVID-19 pandemic, oncologist Kashyap Patel began noticing an unsettling trend. During a routine Friday lunch with his team at Carolina Blood and Cancer Care Associates, he shared a case of a patient in his 40s diagnosed with cholangiocarcinoma, a rare and lethal cancer of the bile ducts usually seen in much older individuals. The revelation sparked a wave of similar stories from his colleagues, who had also encountered unusually aggressive and rare cancers. Within a year, Patel's office had recorded seven such cases. "I've been in practice 23 years and have never seen anything like this," Patel later reflected. His colleague, Asutosh Gor, shared his concern: "We were all shaken." These observations were not isolated. Across the country, doctors were noting a rise in aggressive, late-stage cancers since the pandemic began. Early national data and reports from major cancer institutions confirmed this trend. While many experts attribute this to disruptions in healthcare during the pandemic, others, like Patel, are exploring a more direct link between COVID-19 and cancer. The idea that viruses can cause or accelerate cancer is not new. Since the 1960s, scientists have identified various infectious agents, such as HPV, Epstein-Barr, and hepatitis B, as contributing to 15 to 20 percent of all cancers worldwide. However, establishing a connection between COVID-19 and cancer will likely take years of research. "We are completely under-investigating this virus," stated Douglas C. Wallace, a geneticist and evolutionary biologist from the University of Pennsylvania. He warned that the long-term effects of repeated COVID-19 infections might be more significant than currently understood. Yet, skepticism remains. John T. Schiller, a researcher at the National Institutes of Health, pointed out that respiratory viruses like influenza and RSV, which include coronaviruses, typically do not linger in the body long enough to cause cancer. David Tuveson, director of the Cancer Center at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, acknowledged that while there is no evidence of COVID-19 directly transforming cells into cancerous ones, the virus could act as an environmental stressor. He compared its potential impact to that of tobacco, alcohol, asbestos, or microplastics. "Covid wrecks the body, and that’s where cancers can start," Tuveson explained, noting that autopsy studies of COVID-19 victims showed signs of prematurely aged tissue. As the pandemic unfolded, public health officials anticipated a surge in cancer cases due to delayed screenings and treatment interruptions. Studies, such as a paper in Lancet Oncology, confirmed increases in Stage 4 cancers across various types by late 2020. Institutions like Baptist Health Miami Cancer Institute and UC San Diego Health reported continued rises in late-stage cancers. Xuesong Han, a scientific director at the American Cancer Society, cited multiple reasons for this trend, including healthcare disruptions, economic factors, and societal barriers. However, Han also acknowledged the need to explore biological mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 that could influence cancer development. Afshin Beheshti, president of the COVID-19 International Research Team, shared similar concerns. His group of scientists, initially formed to tackle the virus, began investigating its potential links to cancer. Beheshti, with a background in cancer biology, found the widespread inflammation and vascular impacts of COVID-19 particularly troubling. "It kept nagging on my mind," he said. About a year ago, Beheshti contacted Patel, who had been documenting unusual cancer patterns. Together, they hosted a symposium with other scientists, concluding that there was compelling evidence to suggest links between the coronavirus and cancer. "Hopefully, we’re wrong," Beheshti remarked, "but everything is, unfortunately, pushing toward that being the case." Various research efforts are now underway to investigate these potential links. Wallace is studying how COVID-19 affects cellular energy production, which might influence cancer susceptibility. Biodata experts are sequencing gene profiles from COVID-19 victims' organs, and a University of Colorado team is exploring whether COVID-19 can reawaken dormant cancer cells in mice. Their preliminary findings, published in April, indicated that SARS-CoV-2 could indeed trigger cancer cell proliferation in the lungs of cancer-surviving mice. Ashani Weeraratna, a professor at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, emphasized the importance of these findings, though she cautioned that mouse studies do not always translate to human experiences. She also noted that the research focused on acute infection or long COVID, not on the coronavirus vaccine, countering misinformation spread by some anti-vaccine groups. "Mitigating risk of infection may be of particular importance for cancer patients," Weeraratna advised, underscoring the need for protective measures like masks, avoiding crowded places, and vaccination. Further studies have hinted at potential mechanisms linking COVID-19 to cancer. Research from the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences showed that SARS-CoV-2 proteins could fuel the replication of a herpesvirus linked to cancer. Other studies suggested that the coronavirus might disrupt the body's tumor suppression abilities, although direct evidence is still lacking. Wallace argued that the lack of data on COVID-19 and cancer is more a result of policy decisions than scientific challenges. "Most governments don’t want to think about long COVID and much less long COVID and cancer," he said, criticizing the lack of funding for long-term effects of the virus. "I don’t think that’s a wise choice." Patel, driven by his firsthand observations, is conducting his own research into what he calls "an unusual pattern" of cancers. He is examining potential correlations between long-COVID markers and unusual cancers, collecting data from nearly 300 patients, and advocating for a national registry to analyze trends. His office has recorded numerous cases of patients with multiple cancers, rare cancers, and even couples diagnosed with new cancers since the pandemic began. Patel theorizes that multiple COVID-19 infections could have cumulative effects, and that pandemic-related stress might exacerbate inflammation, increasing cancer risk. If a link is established, it could lead to earlier screenings and preventive measures for at-risk patients. One of Patel’s patients, a 78-year-old diagnosed with three cancers within a year, exemplifies the urgency of this research. Another case involves Bob and Bonnie Krall, a couple who faced three types of cancer between them in just over a year. Despite lacking a family history of cancer, both had high levels of coronavirus antibodies, suggesting a possible connection. "It’s like a cold. It seems like everyone has it," remarked Bob Krall, a 73-year-old flight instructor, reflecting on the prevalence of cancer among his acquaintances. Even before Patel mentioned his research, Bonnie Krall had wondered if their cancers were related to COVID-19, as she was infected shortly before her diagnosis. "Maybe if we didn’t get covid…" she speculated, though her husband, Bob, remained uncertain about the possible outcomes. The emerging evidence and ongoing research underscore the need for a deeper understanding of COVID-19’s long-term impacts. While definitive answers may take years, the potential link between the virus and cancer is a critical area of investigation that could shape public health strategies and patient care for years to come. Credit: Washington Post 2024-06-10 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

A trolling comment with a deliberatly misspelt members name has been removed along with comments making unsubstaniated claims

Update: How Israel Freed Four Hostages and Granted a Dying Wish The rescue mission, described as “the ultimate surprise” by the Israeli military, was carried out in broad daylight within one of the most densely populated refugee camps in the world. It involved undercover operatives from Yamam, the elite anti-terrorism unit of the Israeli police, and Shin Bet, Israel's internal security service. The complexity and danger of the mission were immense, as the hostages were held in heavily guarded rooms within buildings also occupied by Gazan civilian families. Rear-Admiral Daniel Hagari, briefing journalists after the mission, compared it to the legendary Entebbe raid of 1976. The Israeli intelligence had discovered the hostages’ locations two weeks prior, and meticulous planning ensued. Models were created to simulate the mission, knowing that there was always a risk that the hostages could be moved or killed before the rescue could be executed. The tension reached its peak when IDF Chief of Staff Herzi Halevi gave the go-ahead at 11:25 AM. The raid commenced simultaneously on both buildings where the hostages were held. Argamani’s captors were quickly neutralized, and she was swiftly taken to a waiting helicopter on the beach. The extraction of the three other hostages—Almog Meir Jan, 22, Andrey Kozlov, 27, and Shlomi Ziv, 41—was more perilous, involving a fierce gunfight that left Chief Inspector Arnon Zmora critically wounded. As the operatives and hostages made their way to the beach, they faced intense fire from terrorists armed with rocket-propelled grenades. Despite these challenges, the mission was successful, and all four hostages were safely flown out of Gaza. The daring rescue provided a much-needed morale boost to Israel, a nation that had been feeling increasingly isolated and despondent. The impact of the rescue was profound. Benny Gantz, a key member of Israel’s war cabinet, postponed his resignation, which he had planned due to frustrations with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s handling of postwar plans. Instead, Gantz joined the nation in celebrating the hostages' return, a moment that united Israelis in relief and joy. In Tel Aviv, the announcement of the rescue on a popular beach was met with cheers and applause, highlighting the collective sense of triumph and hope that the operation brought. Netanyahu praised the courage and resourcefulness of the Israeli forces, reiterating Israel's commitment to not surrendering to terrorism and continuing efforts to bring all hostages home. The international response was also positive. President Joe Biden, speaking from Paris, pledged continued American support to ensure the safe return of all hostages and emphasized the importance of reaching a ceasefire. French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz also expressed their congratulations, recognizing the operation as a significant sign of hope. Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant hailed the mission as one of the most heroic operations he had witnessed in his 47 years of service. The rescue of Noa Argamani and the three other hostages was not only a tactical success but also a poignant moment of fulfillment of a dying mother’s wish to see her daughter again, symbolizing the resilience and determination of the Israeli people in the face of adversity. U.S. Intelligence Helped Israel Rescue Four Hostages in Gaza Intelligence collection and analysis teams from the U.S. and the U.K. have been in Israel throughout the war. A team of American hostage recovery officials stationed in Israel assisted the Israeli military’s effort to rescue the four captives by providing intelligence and other logistical support, one American official said, speaking without attribution to discuss the sensitive operation. Intelligence collection and analysis teams from the United States and Britain have been in Israel throughout the war, assisting Israeli intelligence in collecting and analyzing information related to the hostages, some of them citizens of both countries, according to a senior Israeli defense official familiar with the effort to locate and rescue the hostages. Two Israeli intelligence officials said the American military officials in Israel provided some of the intelligence about the hostages rescued Saturday. Credit New York Times - The Times 2024-06-10

Reminder, any specific claims must be made with a credible link. Thank you.

Off topic history lesson removed, re-read the topic title please. Post with Paywall links removed

A random totally off topic video has been removed. A reminder of what this thread is about: Gaza War Protesters Criticize Biden in 'Red Line' Rally at White House

New topic just published: Gaza War Protesters Criticize Biden in 'Red Line' Rally at White House

Thousands of protesters gathered near the White House on Saturday, expressing their anger at President Joe Biden's perceived tolerance of Israel's military campaign against Hamas in Gaza. The rally, dubbed the "red line" protest, saw demonstrators chanting "From DC to Palestine, we are the red line," while holding a banner listing the names of Palestinians killed by Israeli forces. This demonstration comes as the conflict enters its ninth month. “I support by any means necessary what Hamas can do to resist the genocide that Israel and the Jews who do it.” The protesters are frustrated with Biden's handling of the situation, accusing him of not taking a strong enough stance against Israel's actions. In May, the White House stated that a deadly Israeli strike on Rafah did not cross a "red line" that Biden had previously set, leading to further dissatisfaction among those critical of the U.S. response. One protester, Zaid Mahdawi, a 25-year-old from Virginia with Palestinian parents, expressed his disillusionment with Biden's statements. "I no longer believe any of the words that Joe Biden says," Mahdawi told AFP. "This 'red line' in his rhetoric is rubbish... it shows his hypocrisy and his cowardice." Tala McKinney, also 25, voiced similar sentiments. "I think we all hope it's going to stop soon but clearly our president is not living up to the words he is speaking to our country. It's outrageous," said McKinney, a nursing assistant. The rally featured participants dressed predominantly in red, carrying Palestinian flags and signs with messages like "Biden's red line was a lie" and "Bombing children is not self-defense." In response to the protest, the White House increased security measures, including an additional anti-scale perimeter fence. Protesters were bussed in from various states, including Maine and Florida. With the 2024 presidential election approaching, Biden faces pressure to retain support from Muslim and young voters, key demographics for his reelection campaign. McKinney, reflecting the frustration of many protesters, said, "It's very disappointing to have a president who doesn't follow through with their word... I will be voting for a third party." As Biden continues to navigate the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the criticism from protesters underscores the challenges he faces in balancing international alliances and domestic voter expectations. Credit: France 24 News 2024-06-09 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

IDF explanation of the rescue operations

President Herzog called rescued hostage Noa Argamani after she arrived in hospital to welcome her home on behalf of the entire nation💙

In a significant operation, the Israeli army has announced the successful rescue of four Israeli hostages who were kidnapped by Hamas during their attacks on the Nova music festival on October 7. The hostages—Noa Argamani, 25, Almog Meir Jan, 21, Andri Kozlov, 27, and Shlomi Ziv, 40—were freed from two separate locations in Nuseirat, central Gaza. The rescue was a joint effort involving the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), the Israel Securities Authority, and the Israel Police. Described as a "complex" daytime operation, it highlights the coordinated efforts of these agencies to secure the hostages' release. The IDF confirmed that all four individuals are in good medical condition and have been transferred to Sheba Tel-HaShomer Medical Center for further medical examinations. Noa Argamani, a Chinese-born Israeli citizen, was among those kidnapped. Verified video footage, authenticated by her father, Yaakov Argamani, shows Noa being taken away on the back of a motorbike, screaming, "Don't kill me!" This harrowing footage brought international attention to her plight. However, the operation was not without consequences. The Hamas-run health ministry in Gaza reported that dozens of people, including children, were killed and injured during the raid. Staff at Al-Aqsa hospital are reportedly struggling to treat the casualties resulting from the operation. The release of these hostages marks a crucial moment in the ongoing conflict, reflecting both the complexities and the human toll of the situation. As the hostages undergo medical evaluations, their rescue brings a measure of relief amidst a backdrop of ongoing violence and humanitarian concerns in Gaza. This is a breaking news story and will be updated in due course. UPDATE: Noa Argamani (25), Almog Meir Jan (21), Andrey Kozlov (27), and Shlomi Ziv (40) were rescued in a special operation by the IDF, ISA and Israel Police from 2 separate locations in the heart of Nuseirat after being kidnapped by Hamas from the Nova music festival. They are in good medical condition and have been transferred to the 'Sheba' Tel-HaShomer Medical Center for further medical examinations. We will continue to make every effort to bring the hostages home. Credit: BBC 2024-06-08 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

William Anders, the renowned Apollo 8 astronaut who captured the iconic "Earthrise" photo, died at age 90 in a plane crash near the San Juan Islands. The tragic incident occurred on Friday when the vintage Air Force T-34 Mentor plane he was piloting nose-dived into the waters near Orcas and Jones Islands. The devastating news was confirmed by Greg Anders, William's son, who expressed the family's deep sorrow. “The family is devastated,” he stated. “He was a great pilot. He will be missed.” Witnesses reported seeing the aircraft performing a loop maneuver before it crashed into the water. Philip Person, who witnessed the crash from a nearby cabin, recounted the horrifying scene to KING News. “I could not believe what I was seeing in front of my eyes,” Person said. “It looked like something right out of a movie or special effects. With the large explosion and flames and everything.” The crash has prompted an investigation by the National Transportation Safety Board and the Federal Aviation Administration. Officials from the San Juan County Sheriff’s Office, the US Coast Guard, and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife responded to the crash site. William Anders' legacy extends far beyond his tragic end. He was part of the historic Apollo 8 mission, the first manned mission to leave Earth's gravitational sphere and orbit the Moon. This mission was a pivotal moment in space exploration, and Anders played a crucial role as the lunar module pilot. On December 24, 1968, during the mission, Anders took the famous "Earthrise" photograph. This image, showing Earth rising over the lunar horizon, became one of the most influential photographs in history. It not only captured the beauty of our planet but also highlighted its fragility, inspiring the environmental movement of the late 1960s. Reflecting on the impact of the "Earthrise" photo, Anders told Forbes in a 2015 interview, “The view points out the beauty of Earth, and its fragility. It helped kick start the environmental movement.” US Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona, a former NASA astronaut, paid tribute to Anders on social media. “Bill Anders forever changed our perspective of our planet and ourselves with his famous Earthrise photo on Apollo 8,” he wrote. “He inspired me and generations of astronauts and explorers. My thoughts are with his family and friends.” Before his career with NASA, Anders served as a major in the Air Force. His contributions to space exploration and his remarkable photographic legacy have left an indelible mark on history. His tragic death is a significant loss to the space community and to all who were inspired by his work and life. As the investigation into the crash continues, the world remembers William Anders not just as a skilled pilot and astronaut but as a visionary who brought the Earth’s beauty and vulnerability into sharp focus. His contributions to space exploration and environmental awareness will be remembered for generations to come. Credit: The Independent 2024-06-08 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In a development that could potentially impact the case against former President Donald Trump, the judge overseeing his hush-money trial in New York City has flagged a concerning social media post. Justice Juan Merchan, who is presiding over the case, wrote a letter to prosecutors and Trump's defense team about a Facebook comment in which an individual claimed to have known the jury's decision before it was officially announced. The post, which has since been deleted, was made by a user named "Michael Anderson." The comment read, "My cousin is a juror and says Trump is getting convicted. Thank you folks for all your hard work!!!" This post was in response to a May 29 post on the court’s Facebook page, discussing oral arguments unrelated to the Trump case. Trump was convicted on May 30 on 34 counts of falsifying business records, with his sentencing scheduled for July 11. Justice Merchan's letter, which has not specified whether the post has been verified or if any investigation has taken place, noted that the court became aware of the comment last Friday. The Manhattan District Attorney's Office and Trump's lead attorney, Todd Blanche, did not respond to requests for comment. The revelation of this post raises significant questions about potential jury misconduct. Jurors in Trump’s case were under strict instructions not to discuss the case with anyone outside the courtroom until their verdict was reached. If the post's claim is substantiated, it could suggest that one or more jurors violated these instructions, which might have influenced the trial’s outcome. Although BBC News has not verified the authenticity of the post or the claims made within it, the situation presents a possible avenue for Trump’s defense team. They might request that the verdict be set aside temporarily while the matter is investigated. Furthermore, if they can prove that jury misconduct occurred and affected Trump’s right to a fair trial, they could move for a new trial. The defense could also ask the judge to question each juror individually to determine if any external influence impacted their decision-making process. Such a step would be critical to ensuring the integrity of the judicial process, especially given the high-profile nature of the case, which marks the first-ever criminal conviction of a former U.S. president. The post, reportedly made by an account known for trolling the social media pages of the New York court system, adds another layer of complexity to the proceedings. The incident underscores the challenges courts face in the digital age, where social media can easily disrupt the confidentiality and impartiality of legal processes. As the case continues, the defense team's next moves will be closely watched. Any substantiated claim of jury tampering or misconduct could significantly alter the course of Trump’s legal battles and potentially lead to further legal scrutiny and public debate about the fairness of his trial. The situation highlights the ongoing tension between maintaining courtroom integrity and navigating the pervasive influence of social media. Credit: BBC 2024-06-08 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

New Topic:

In an upcoming report set to be presented to the United Nations Security Council and released publicly on June 18, the U.N. will include Israel, Hamas, and Palestinian Islamic Jihad on a list of countries and armed groups that harm children in conflict zones. This decision stems from the significant impact the conflict in Gaza has had on minors, including fatalities, injuries, and starvation. U.N. spokesman Stéphane Dujarric revealed that the U.N. chief of staff had informed Israel's ambassador to the United Nations, Gilad Erdan, about the decision as a professional courtesy. "The call was a courtesy afforded to countries that are newly listed," Dujarric explained, emphasizing the intention to prevent leaks and provide advance notice. Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad are being named due to their involvement in abductions and killings of Israeli children during the October 7 attack on Israel. The inclusion of Israel on the list highlights the impact of its retaliatory actions in Gaza, which have resulted in significant civilian casualties, including children. According to Gazan health officials, Israel’s bombing campaign and ground war in Gaza have killed at least 36,000 people, a substantial portion of whom are women and children. The U.N. has also reported severe humanitarian conditions in Gaza, with children facing famine and starvation due to restricted humanitarian aid, and many suffering from severe injuries and loss of limbs. The announcement has further strained Israel's already tense relationship with the United Nations. Ambassador Erdan condemned the decision as "an immoral decision that aids terrorism and rewards terrorists." He also released parts of his phone call with the U.N. on social media, an action Dujarric criticized as "shocking and unacceptable." The annual report on children and armed conflict is prepared by the U.N.'s special representative for children and armed conflict under mandates from the General Assembly and the Security Council. This report routinely includes armed groups known for harming children, such as the Taliban and Boko Haram. Majed Bamya, the Palestinian deputy ambassador to the United Nations, commented on the listing via social media, stating, "Israeli ministers are the only ones surprised of such a development (list will be released next week) after the killing and maiming of so many Palestinian children." As the report is formally presented and debated later this month, it underscores the ongoing and severe impact of the conflict on children in Gaza, bringing international attention to the humanitarian crisis and the need for accountability and resolution. Credit: New York Times 2024-06-08 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Labour leader Keir Starmer is set to unveil a significant policy shift in the party's forthcoming election manifesto, pledging to recognize a Palestinian state. This move, aimed at reassuring the left-wing faction of the party, will highlight Labour's commitment to international peace processes and regional stability. Sources familiar with the draft manifesto indicate that it will state that a Palestinian state should be recognized as part of a peace process and not subject to vetoes by other states in the region. This specific wording is seen as an attempt to address the concerns of party members who were discontented with the leadership's stance against a ceasefire following the October 7 attacks. Despite this new commitment, Labour insists there has been no change in Sir Keir Starmer's position on the recognition of Palestine through an international process, alongside ensuring the safety and security of Israel. The manifesto, which is set to be finalized and signed off by party officials and unions, is expected to emphasize economic stability and national security, maintaining a cautious approach towards new commitments. The manifesto will be built around the six key pledges that Sir Keir has outlined during his campaign, focusing on economic growth, the recruitment of 6,500 additional teachers, tackling NHS waiting lists, and addressing anti-social behavior. Additionally, it will commit to "driving down" migration, though it will not specify a target, and it does not include a pledge to reverse the two-child benefit cap, despite previous criticism from senior Labour figures. In a recent interview with Sky News, Sir Keir Starmer was asked whether a government under his leadership would follow the example of Spain, Ireland, and Norway in recognizing a Palestinian state. He emphasized that such recognition had to occur "at the right time in the [peace] process" and needed international backing and consensus. "That's only going to happen if we work with our partners on it," he said. Israel has reacted angrily to the decisions by several European governments, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu calling these moves a "reward for terrorism." Labour views its stance as distinct from these governments' actions. A party spokesman clarified, "Our position of recognizing a Palestinian state as part of an international process was agreed at the National Policy Forum last July." This approach contrasts with the immediate and unconditional recognition of Palestine promised in Jeremy Corbyn's 2017 and 2019 manifestos. The draft manifesto's wording echoes that of the foreign secretary, Lord Cameron, who stated in January that the Palestinian people would need to see "irreversible progress" towards a two-state solution, Hamas must leave Gaza for two-state solution, Lord Cameron says. The manifesto also addresses workers' rights, a topic that has been a source of contention with union leaders for months. It includes commitments to banning "exploitative" zero-hour contracts and the practice of fire and rehire. This alignment with workers' rights is intended to solidify Labour's support among its traditional base while also addressing contemporary labor issues. The final version of the manifesto will be signed off after several hours of discussion at a "Clause Five" meeting and will be officially unveiled to the public next Thursday. This key moment in the election campaign will reflect Labour's vision for the future, balancing domestic priorities with international commitments. Labour's manifesto marks a significant moment in the party's approach to both national and international issues. By pledging to recognize a Palestinian state as part of a peace process, Labour aims to demonstrate its commitment to international justice and regional stability. This pledge is designed to resonate with the party's left-wing members, who have been critical of the leadership's previous stance on the Israel-Palestine conflict. Sir Keir Starmer's strategic move also reflects a broader vision of promoting peace through international cooperation and consensus. By emphasizing the need for recognition to occur at the right time and with international backing, Labour underscores its commitment to a balanced and pragmatic approach to foreign policy. The manifesto's cautious stance on new commitments highlights Labour's focus on economic stability and national security, ensuring that the party presents a responsible and credible alternative to the current government. The inclusion of key pledges on economic growth, education, healthcare, and anti-social behavior demonstrates Labour's dedication to addressing the pressing issues facing the UK. Credit: Sky News 2024-06-08 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

The recent guilty verdict against former President Donald Trump has spurred an alarming increase in inflammatory rhetoric and threats from far-right groups and white nationalists. Monitoring organizations have reported a surge in violent threats, racist language, and conspiracy theories, particularly aimed at people of color and immigrants, reflecting the deepening political and social tensions in the United States. In the immediate aftermath of the verdict, far-right groups took to online platforms to voice their outrage. White nationalists likened Trump's conviction to the United States becoming a "third world country" or a "banana republic," as reported by the Western States Center, a group that monitors anti-democracy movements. The Proud Boys, a well-known far-right extremist group, issued a statement on one of its websites: "Don't be surprised, you know this was going to happen. Stand back and stand by this is far from over, we promise." Additionally, an Ohio chapter of the Proud Boys explicitly vowed "war," further escalating the rhetoric of resistance and confrontation. Stephen Miller, a former Trump aide and the current president of America First Legal, expressed similar sentiments. In a statement, he declared, "This is the road to serfdom — unless this Marxist lawfare is stopped, halted, and reversed and democracy restored." This kind of language underscores the belief among Trump's supporters that the legal actions against him are part of a broader conspiracy aimed at dismantling their political movement. Trump himself has contributed to this charged atmosphere by making threats about prosecuting his opponents and using bigoted language to describe immigrants. After the verdict, he responded with rhetoric associated with the white replacement theory, claiming, "Millions of people pouring into our country right now from prisons and from mental institutions...and they're taking over our country." This language is designed to incite fear and resentment among his supporters, further inflaming already heightened tensions. Lindsay Schubiner, program director at the Western States Center, warned that the violent promises from various far-right groups could encourage individuals to commit acts of violence. She emphasized, "It lays the groundwork for more anti-democracy actions and that's particularly dangerous in the lead-up to the election." Schubiner also pointed out that many social media posts blame immigrants for Trump's guilty verdict, despite the case having no connection to immigration. This scapegoating serves to divert attention from the actual legal issues and stoke racial and xenophobic tensions. The rhetoric from these groups has also included attacks on the racial diversity of New York City, where Trump's trial was held, and racist remarks about Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who is Black. Such comments are part of a broader pattern of racist and bigoted language that has become increasingly prevalent in far-right discourse. Brian Levin, the recently retired director of the Center for the Study of Hate and Extremism, noted a significant increase in Google searches for terms like "rigged trial," "boycott New York," and "kill the judge" following the verdict. He observed, "While violent and intimidation-directed rhetoric definitively sloped up, it did so the week before the conviction, when there were similar false narratives concerning some of Mr. Trump's other difficulties already in mainstream circulation." This suggests that the heightened rhetoric and threats were not isolated incidents but part of a broader pattern of extremist behavior. The response from extremist groups underscores the normalization of conspiracies and aggression in reaction to current events. Schubiner expressed concern that the unchecked behavior online could become normalized, putting immigrants and people of color at increased risk. The normalization of extremist behavior is particularly troubling given the potential for real-world violence. These recent events highlight the dangerous intersection of political rhetoric, extremist ideologies, and the potential for violence. The rhetoric from far-right groups and white nationalists, amplified by Trump's own statements, creates an environment where violence and intimidation are increasingly viewed as acceptable responses to political and legal setbacks. This development poses a significant threat to the safety and well-being of vulnerable communities, as well as to the integrity of the democratic process. Credit: Daily AXIOS 2024-06-08 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Eighty years have passed since the D-Day landings, yet the valor and sacrifice of the tens of thousands of troops who fought to liberate Europe from tyranny remain a shining beacon of courage and selflessness. We rightly celebrate the dwindling number of veterans and honor their fallen comrades, expressing our gratitude for their immeasurable contributions. However, there is a profound sadness in recognizing that the Britain these heroes fought to defend seems to be fading away before our very eyes. It is tragic to witness the casual abandonment of the freedoms they sacrificed so much to preserve. Perhaps most galling is the perception that many Britons today despise the very country these heroes sought to protect. The most fundamental freedom of all—freedom of speech—is under threat. In today’s Britain, holding an unpopular opinion often results in abuse, professional ruin, and social ostracization. Consider the experiences of Graham Linehan, Rosie Duffield, Kathleen Stock, and countless others who have faced severe backlash for expressing their views. Ironically, social media, which was once seen as a platform for free expression, has often become a tool for silencing dissenting voices. Without freedom of speech, true democracy cannot exist. This erosion of free expression was starkly highlighted by the attempts, spearheaded by Sir Keir Starmer, to overturn the Brexit referendum, treating the democratic will of the people as a mere inconvenience. The erosion of freedoms does not stop with speech. The COVID-19 pandemic revealed a troubling willingness among many Britons to surrender their liberties. During the pandemic, draconian lockdown measures were not only accepted but, in many cases, demanded. People cheered for severe restrictions, even at the cost of their children's education and social development. Fear proved to be a powerful tool in persuading the public to accept, and even call for, stringent controls on their lives. Sir Keir Starmer emerged as a leading advocate for lockdowns, frequently criticizing the government for any relaxation of restrictions. However, it was a Conservative prime minister who initially imposed these extreme measures. This bipartisan embrace of restrictive policies raises concerns about the future of personal freedom in Britain. Another threat to liberty is the rise of "wokery," a social philosophy characterized by judging historical figures and events by contemporary standards and dividing society into oppressors and oppressed. This worldview condemns Britain’s past as a source of shame and seeks to reconstruct its present according to modern ideological norms. Consequently, we see absurdities such as convicted male rapists being sent to female prisons upon declaring themselves women, the defacement of Winston Churchill’s statue, and a populace increasingly reliant on the government for guidance on how to live their lives. Any country will inevitably change over the course of eight decades, and Britain is no exception. However, the determination to protect and cherish freedom should remain a constant. This was the essence of what D-Day represented. Imagine if the thousands of young men who died on those beaches could see Britain today in 2024. Would they recognize the country they sacrificed their lives to protect? Would they understand how easily we have surrendered our liberties? The decline of free speech, the eagerness to relinquish personal freedoms, and the rise of divisive social ideologies suggest a Britain that might be unrecognizable to the D-Day generation. It is imperative that we reflect on this trajectory and recommit ourselves to the principles of freedom and democracy that so many fought and died to defend. Only then can we truly honor their legacy and ensure that their sacrifices were not in vain. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-06-08 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's decision to leave an international D-Day 80th anniversary ceremony early for a television interview has been met with significant backlash, even from within his own party. The controversy erupted after Sunak departed the commemorative events in Normandy, France, to return to the UK and defend his claims about Sir Keir Starmer’s tax plans in an interview with ITV, leaving other world leaders like Joe Biden, Emmanuel Macron, and the Prince of Wales at the event. Tim Montgomerie, founder of Conservative Home, criticized Sunak's actions as "political malpractice of the highest order," expressing disbelief at the Prime Minister's decision to prioritize a campaign interview over the D-Day ceremony. Lord Shaun Bailey, the Tory candidate in the 2021 London mayoral election, also condemned the move, suggesting that Sunak's presence at such a significant event would have been more impactful. Amid growing criticism, Sunak issued an apology on Twitter, acknowledging his mistake and emphasizing his deep respect for veterans. He stated, "After the conclusion of the British event in Normandy, I returned back to the UK. On reflection, it was a mistake not to stay in France longer – and I apologise.” Labour seized the opportunity to criticize Sunak, with Jonathan Ashworth, the shadow paymaster general, calling the Prime Minister's actions a "dereliction of duty" and accusing him of lying during the television interview. Ashworth stated, “The Prime Minister skipping off early from D-Day commemorations to record a television interview where he once again lied through his teeth is both an embarrassment and a total dereliction of duty. Our country deserves so much better than out-of-touch, desperate Rishi Sunak and his chaotic Tory Party.” The controversial interview with ITV's Paul Brand saw Sunak rejecting Labour's accusations of dishonesty regarding his claims that Labour would hike taxes by £2,000, a statement later criticized by the UK statistics watchdog. Sunak argued that independent Treasury officials had costed Labour's policies, but this was contradicted by James Bowler, the Treasury’s permanent secretary, who clarified that ministers had been advised not to suggest that civil servants produced the figure. The row originated from a Conservative document estimating the cost of potential Labour policies, suggesting a £38.5 billion deficit over four years, which the Tories equated to a £2,094 tax rise per working household. The Office for Statistics Regulation criticized the Conservatives for not making clear that the estimate was summed over four years, indicating a potential misuse of statistics during the campaign. Rishi Sunak's early departure from the D-Day commemoration for a TV interview has sparked significant controversy and criticism from both within his party and from opposition members. The incident has highlighted internal party divisions and raised questions about Sunak's political judgment and priorities during a crucial period leading up to elections. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-06-08 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

The Labour Party has decided to cease its extensive legal proceedings against five former staff members from Jeremy Corbyn's tenure, including his ex-director of communications Seumas Milne and former chief of staff Karie Murphy. This move marks the end of a costly and contentious legal battle. The quintet, accused of leaking a controversial report on the handling of antisemitism complaints under Corbyn's leadership, had consistently vowed to "vigorously defend themselves" in the High Court. The Labour Party had reportedly expended nearly £1.5 million up to October of the previous year on the case, with the total costs expected to be significantly higher, potentially reaching an additional £900,000 since last autumn. The contentious 860-page report, leaked in April 2020 shortly after Sir Keir Starmer assumed leadership of the Labour Party, detailed the workings of Labour's governance and legal unit. The report asserted that there was "no evidence" of antisemitism complaints being managed differently from other types of complaints. However, it also included thousands of private WhatsApp messages between senior party officials, many of which were derogatory about Labour staff, members, and Corbyn-supporting MPs. During Corbyn's leadership, the party faced numerous antisemitism complaints and accusations that senior officials were slow to act against members promoting such views. The leaked report exacerbated tensions within the party, as it revealed internal communications critical of Corbyn's allies and supporters. Carter-Ruck, the legal firm representing the former staff members, issued a statement confirming the party's decision to discontinue its legal claims against Karie Murphy, Seumas Milne, Georgie Robertson, Harry Hayball, and Laura Murray on a "no order as to costs" basis. The statement also noted that the five individuals welcomed the resolution of the claims. This costly legal battle had raised concerns among party members and officials, particularly regarding its potential impact on Labour's election fund. Mish Rahman, a member of Labour's National Executive Committee, criticized the case, describing it as "pointless and vindictive" and another example of Starmer's team targeting the left faction of the party. A Labour candidate and former shadow cabinet member, who preferred to remain anonymous, echoed these sentiments, labeling the case a "huge embarrassment for the party" and criticizing the official appointed by Starmer to lead the case for wasting substantial sums of money that could have been crucial in key election seats. A Labour Party spokesperson reiterated the decision to discontinue the legal claims, noting that the five former staff members welcomed the resolution of the claims. This decision brings an end to a protracted and divisive chapter within the Labour Party, allowing it to focus on future challenges and elections without the shadow of this costly legal dispute. Credit: Sky News 2024-06-08 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Taylor Swift has received widespread acclaim for her heartfelt support of the LGBTQ+ community during a recent concert in France as part of her record-breaking Eras Tour. The pop sensation, known for her advocacy and inclusive messages, made a poignant statement celebrating Pride Month, resonating deeply with fans and garnering praise across social media. Swift’s Eras Tour, which began in March 2023, has already set records as the highest-grossing live music tour, even before reaching the halfway mark of its 152 shows worldwide. Currently in the midst of the European leg, Swift performed at Groupama Stadium in Lyon, France, on June 2, where she made headlines for her uplifting message. "Happy Pride Month, Lyon," Swift declared to the audience while performing her 2019 hit "You Need to Calm Down," a song that tackles internet trolls and homophobia while expressing support for the LGBTQ+ community. This moment was captured on video and first posted to X (formerly Twitter) by user @dearpaitence, with the caption: "TAYLOR SAYING HAPPY PRIDE MONTH #LyonTSTheErasTour." The video quickly went viral, being reshared by @tswifterastour, an unofficial tour update account, and the entertainment page @PopCrave. Collectively, the video has amassed over 1.2 million views. Fans reacted emotionally to Swift’s message, with many sharing their experiences and expressing gratitude. One fan commented, "Crying, sobbing, and then there was Ro and I in that stadium with our flags [multiple crying emojis] we truly took that concert like it was a Pride parade (and it was)." Another fan shared, "If she does this in Edinburgh, I'm just gonna bawl and turn to my mum and say I like women, then she's gonna go, 'I know.'" Other comments included, "HAPPY PRIDE MONTH TO YOU TOO TAY," and "OH I LOVE HER [crying emoji and heart hands emoji]," reflecting the deep emotional connection fans have with Swift and her support for the LGBTQ+ community. The significance of Swift's message is rooted in a long history of Pride celebrations. Twenty-five years ago, President Bill Clinton declared June as Gay and Lesbian Pride Month, commemorating the 1969 Stonewall Uprising, a pivotal event in the LGBTQ+ rights movement. In 2011, President Barack Obama expanded Pride Month to include the entire LGBTQ+ community, further solidifying June as a time for celebration and reflection. Swift’s Eras Tour is a monumental production featuring 16 backup dancers, four vocalists, and a dedicated live band. The three-and-a-half-hour show spans 44 songs across 10 acts, each representing a different "era" of Swift’s illustrious career. Recently, the setlist was updated to include tracks from her 11th studio album, *The Tortured Poets Department (TTPD)*, released in April. The album shattered streaming records, becoming Spotify's most-streamed album in a single day with 300 million streams in 24 hours, and has topped the Billboard 200 album charts for five consecutive weeks. Following the European leg, which concludes in mid-August, Swift will perform in select American cities, including Miami, New Orleans, and Indianapolis, before wrapping up the tour in Canada. The final show is scheduled for December 8 in Vancouver, just days before Swift's 35th birthday on December 13. Taylor Swift's Pride Month message in Lyon is a testament to her enduring commitment to inclusivity and support for the LGBTQ+ community. As her Eras Tour continues to break records and touch lives, Swift remains a powerful advocate for love, acceptance, and the celebration of diversity. Credit: Newsweek 2024-06-08 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Former President Donald Trump has called for criminal charges against members of the January 6 House committee, which investigated the attack on the U.S. Capitol by his supporters. This demand came in response to the four-month prison sentence handed to Steve Bannon, Trump's former White House chief strategist, for defying a congressional subpoena issued by the committee. In a post on Truth Social, Trump described Bannon's sentencing as "a Total and Complete American Tragedy" and argued that the true culprits were the committee members themselves. He accused the committee of illegally deleting and destroying evidence from their investigation and urged law enforcement to indict them. Trump wrote, "The unAmerican Weaponization of our Law Enforcement has reached levels of Illegality never thought possible before. INDICT THE UNSELECT J6 COMMITTEE FOR ILLEGALLY DELETING AND DESTROYING ALL OF THEIR 'FINDINGS!' MAGA2024." The January 6 committee comprised seven Democrats and two Republicans. Five of the Democratic members are still in office: Representatives Bennie Thompson, Adam Schiff, Pete Aguilar, Zoe Lofgren, and Jamie Raskin. The committee's two Republican members, Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger, are no longer in Congress, with Cheney losing her reelection bid in 2022 and Kinzinger choosing not to run. Another Democratic member, Elaine Luria, also lost her reelection bid in 2022, and Stephanie Murphy did not seek reelection. Trump's allegations center around claims that the committee "deleted" all of its evidence. This accusation was fueled by remarks from Representative Barry Loudermilk, the Republican chairman of the House Administration's Subcommittee on Oversight. Loudermilk reported that some evidence from the committee's investigation was not preserved, including video recordings and transcripts of witness interviews. Despite these claims, much of the committee's work was made public through an 845-page report and televised hearings, with several witness transcripts also available to the public. In its final days, the January 6 committee made criminal referrals to the Justice Department, recommending that Trump face charges for his actions related to the Capitol attack. The DOJ later indicted Trump for attempting to unlawfully remain in office after his defeat in the 2020 presidential election. Responding to Trump's claims, Representative Zoe Lofgren dismissed the allegations as "garbage" during an appearance on CNN. She explained that Bannon was held in contempt for not honoring a subpoena, a straightforward legal issue. Lofgren emphasized Trump's habitual disregard for the truth. Adam Kinzinger also countered Trump's claims by sharing a link to the committee's final report on social media, highlighting the public availability of the evidence. Steve Bannon, after being convicted in July 2022, filed an appeal that delayed his prison sentence. However, the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia recently upheld his conviction, and federal prosecutors asked the court to enforce his sentence. On Thursday, Federal Judge Carl Nichols, a Trump appointee, agreed with the prosecutors, marking another legal setback for Bannon. Trump's latest outburst reflects his ongoing battle with the outcomes of the January 6 investigation and his efforts to shift blame away from himself and his close associates. The controversy surrounding the Capitol attack continues to be a deeply polarizing issue in American politics, influencing both legal proceedings and public discourse. Credit: Newsweek 2024-06-08 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe