Social Media

North Korea’s latest attempt to launch a spy satellite ended in a dramatic mid-air explosion, as confirmed by Pyongyang on Monday. The failure, attributed to the "operational reliability of the engine," marks yet another setback for Kim Jong-un’s regime, which has been fervently pursuing the capability to monitor its adversaries from space. The failed launch was visually documented by Japanese broadcaster NHK, which captured footage of what appeared to be a flaming projectile in the night sky. The projectile eventually exploded into a fireball, an event observed from northeast China, coinciding with the time of the attempted launch. North Korea’s National Aerospace Technology Administration provided a statement via the official Korean Central News Agency, acknowledging the failure. "The satellite exploded in the air during the first flight stage and failed to launch," the statement read. An expert review indicated that the failure stemmed from issues with the "newly developed liquid oxygen and oil engine." This incident follows two previous failed attempts last year and casts doubt on North Korea’s claim of successfully placing the Malligyong-1 (meaning Telescope-1) satellite into orbit in November. Despite Pyongyang’s assertions, Seoul’s intelligence agency has expressed skepticism regarding the satellite’s functionality. Seoul and Tokyo swiftly criticized the planned launch, which had been announced by Pyongyang earlier on Monday. The South Korean military detected the launch and confirmed the satellite's presumed explosion in mid-air. "The South Korean and US intelligence authorities are analysing it in detail in close cooperation," stated South Korea’s joint chiefs of staff. The international response was equally critical. The US Indo-Pacific Command denounced the launch as a "brazen violation of multiple unanimous UN Security Council resolutions," warning that it "risks destabilising the security situation in the region and beyond." Japan briefly issued an alert for residents of southern Okinawa prefecture to seek shelter, though it was lifted shortly afterward. This launch attempt occurred just after the conclusion of the first trilateral summit since 2019 involving Seoul, Beijing, and Tokyo. South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol emphasized that another satellite launch would "undermine regional and global peace and stability." The development of spy satellites is a top priority for North Korea, as they could significantly enhance its intelligence-gathering capabilities, particularly regarding South Korea. Such advancements would provide crucial data in any potential military conflict. The geopolitical implications of North Korea’s satellite ambitions are further complicated by allegations of external assistance. Seoul claims that Kim Jong-un received technical assistance from Russia for the November launch, in exchange for sending containers of weapons to Moscow for use in Ukraine. These allegations add another layer of complexity to the already tense international relations surrounding North Korea’s activities. Kim Jong-un’s meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in September further fuelled suspicions of Russian involvement in North Korea’s space endeavors. Following their meeting, Putin suggested that Russia could help North Korea build satellites. Subsequently, both Seoul and Washington accused Pyongyang of supplying weapons to Moscow, with South Korea alleging that thousands of containers of weapons were shipped for use in Ukraine. Adding to the controversy, reports from Yonhap on Sunday, citing a government official, indicated that a group of Russian engineers had entered North Korea to assist with the launch preparations. This alleged collaboration underscores the broader geopolitical dynamics at play, with North Korea's actions potentially serving broader strategic interests beyond its borders. The repeated failures of North Korea's satellite launches highlight the significant technical challenges faced by the regime. Despite these setbacks, the persistence of these efforts reflects Kim Jong-un’s determination to enhance his regime’s surveillance and intelligence capabilities. However, each failed attempt also invites increased scrutiny and condemnation from the international community, further isolating North Korea and complicating its relations with neighboring countries and global powers. The implications of North Korea's pursuit of satellite technology are profound. Success in this domain would not only bolster its military capabilities but also alter the strategic balance in the region. For now, however, the regime's technological aspirations remain unfulfilled, leaving the international community on edge, wary of the potential repercussions of North Korea's continued defiance and determination. Credit: The Guardian 2024-05-29 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Candidate for the upcoming European elections Marion Marechal, of the far-right Reconquete party, poses before a debate with other party leaders, Monday, May 27, 2024 in Paris. The European Elections will take place on June 9 in France. As the European Union prepares for its upcoming elections, many European citizens find themselves inundated with messages urging them to vote. These messages emphasize the importance of participating in the democratic process with the warning that if you don’t vote, “others will decide for you.” While my rational side agrees with this sentiment, urging me to do my part for democracy, my heart is not in it this time. As a brown, Muslim European who has always hoped for the success of the EU project, I find myself increasingly terrified by the growing influence and power of far-right politicians who are unabashedly racist, xenophobic, and Islamophobic. The rise of far-right ideologies within and outside government poses a significant threat to the values I hold dear. These politicians’ vision for Europe is inherently hostile not only to Muslims but also to women, Jews, and LGBTQ+ individuals, despite what they might publicly claim. The increasing normalization of their views within the political landscape is deeply concerning and signals a bleak future for progressive Europeans, particularly for racial and ethnic minorities. The fear is not unfounded. Evidence of pervasive and relentless racism across Europe is visible, with Islamophobia and antisemitism on the rise, exacerbated by conflicts such as the Israel-Gaza war. The far-right’s anticipated gains in power will likely worsen this situation, especially as the EU’s anti-racism action plan loses momentum. The corrosion of European democracy from within, fueled by racism, discrimination, and xenophobia, creates societal divisions and political polarization. However, these critical issues are rarely discussed in the predominantly white corridors of Brussels. Compounding the problem is the fact that center-right and liberal politicians have often embraced, openly or tacitly, the extremists’ political agenda. This is evident in the EU’s new migration and asylum pact and the European People’s Party’s Rwanda-style plans for sending refugees and migrants to third countries. These policies reflect a toxic worldview that further alienates and marginalizes racial and ethnic minorities. Recent actions by EU governments, such as clamping down on freedom of speech and the right to peaceful assembly for those opposing the Israeli offensive in Gaza, have prompted warnings from Amnesty International. The European Commission’s invitation to Israel’s foreign minister, Israel Katz—whose statements on Palestinians have been cited at the International Court of Justice as evidence of genocidal intent—highlights the extent to which extremist views have infiltrated EU institutions. The trajectory of European politics towards far-right territory was starkly illustrated by the formation of the new Dutch coalition led by Geert Wilders. Wilders, known for his anti-Muslim rhetoric, threatens to close down mosques and ban the Qur’an and hijab. Such developments are alarming for Muslims and other minorities in Europe, and they underscore the need for a robust response from progressive forces. There is some hope in the promises to construct a “cordon sanitaire” around newly elected far-right Members of the European Parliament (MEPs). However, only the left has made clear commitments to tackling systemic racism. There is a pressing need for EU institutions to become more racially diverse and inclusive and to decolonize Eurocentric trade, aid, and foreign policies. Ignoring these issues perpetuates the disconnect between predominantly white EU institutions and the reality of a vibrant, diverse, and multicultural Europe. Representation alone does not guarantee racial justice. Some of Europe’s most hardline anti-immigration politicians are not white. For instance, Geert Wilders has Indonesian ancestry, and his coalition partner, Dilan Yeşilgöz-Zegerius, leader of the People’s Party for Freedom and Democracy, is a former child refugee from Turkey. Nevertheless, Black and brown members make up only about 3% of the current European Parliament, reflecting political parties’ reluctance to include people of color on their lists for the European elections. This lack of representation undermines the legitimacy of EU institutions and perpetuates a vicious cycle of exclusion. For European Muslims, dealing with the EU is a special challenge. The Forum of European Muslim Youth and Student Organisations (Femyso), which brings together young people from across Europe, has struggled to engage with the EU. Despite repeated requests, they have yet to secure a bilateral meeting with the European Commission’s new coordinator for combating anti-Muslim hatred. Furthermore, a meeting with the EU Commissioner for Equality, Helena Dalli, in 2021 was criticized by the French government over unfounded allegations of Femyso’s links with the Muslim Brotherhood, a charge the organization strongly denies. Despite the challenges, many Black and brown Europeans, as well as members of Femyso and Diaspora Vote, remain enthusiastic about voting in the elections. They see it as their duty and responsibility to participate in the democratic process and to be part of the conversation about Europe’s future. Their commitment and passion are far more compelling than the bland platitudes of EU policymakers and politicians about the importance of voting. As the EU elections approach, the stakes for brown, Muslim Europeans—and indeed all progressive Europeans—are higher than ever. The rise of the far right and the pervasive racism and xenophobia within EU institutions pose a significant threat to the values of diversity, inclusion, and justice. It is a time of deep personal anxiety, but also a time to stand up and be counted. By voting and actively participating in the democratic process, we can push back against the forces of intolerance and hate and work towards a more inclusive and equitable Europe. Shada Islam, a Brussels-based commentator on EU affairs Credit: The Guardian 2024-05-29 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

The Pope is reported to have used extremely derogatory language in a private meeting. This incident occurred during a session at the Italian Bishops’ Conference, where the Pope was asked if gay men should be allowed to train for the priesthood provided they remain celibate. Pope Francis reportedly responded negatively and used a highly offensive Italian slur, "frociaggine," to describe the presence of gay individuals within the Church. The comments, initially reported by the Italian investigative website Dagospia, have since been corroborated by other Italian news agencies citing multiple sources. This revelation has sent shockwaves through the Catholic community and beyond, particularly given Pope Francis's public persona as a progressive and compassionate leader. Pope Francis's choice of words is especially jarring because he has often spoken publicly about the need for respect and inclusion of gay people. Early in his papacy, he made headlines with his statement, "Who am I to judge?" in response to a question about gay individuals. This comment was seen as a significant shift in tone for the Catholic Church, which has long held conservative views on homosexuality. The Pope's recent remarks at the Italian Bishops’ Conference, however, seem to contradict his earlier statements and actions. Progressive supporters of Pope Francis have argued that while there has been little tangible change in the Church’s stance on gay rights, the Pope has managed to create a more welcoming and less judgmental atmosphere. His recent suggestion that priests might bless same-sex couples in certain circumstances further fueled hopes that the Church might be moving towards a more inclusive stance. These hopes were seemingly dashed at the conference, where the Pope not only rejected the idea of allowing celibate gay men to train for the priesthood but also reportedly used derogatory language on multiple occasions. Some reports even suggest that he stated gay individuals should be expelled from seminaries regardless of whether they acted on their sexual tendencies. Defenders of Pope Francis have attempted to mitigate the fallout by suggesting that the Pope, who is a native Spanish speaker, may have misused Italian colloquialisms. They argue that he might not have fully understood the offensive nature of the term, despite having grown up in an Italian-speaking household in Argentina. The Vatican has yet to comment officially on the matter, leaving many in the Catholic community and beyond in a state of confusion and concern. This incident highlights the ongoing tension within the Church regarding its stance on homosexuality and the struggle between progressive and traditionalist factions. The reported comments have also sparked wider debates about the Catholic Church's approach to LGBTQ+ issues. Despite Pope Francis's earlier attempts to present a more compassionate face, this incident suggests that deep-seated prejudices and resistance to change remain prevalent within the Church hierarchy. The impact of this controversy is likely to be far-reaching. For many progressive Catholics, Pope Francis had represented a beacon of hope for a more inclusive and understanding Church. This incident, however, casts a shadow over that perception and raises questions about the sincerity of his earlier statements on LGBTQ+ inclusion. Moreover, the Pope’s reported use of such derogatory language could have broader implications for the Church’s global image. As a leader who has garnered significant respect for his progressive views on various social issues, these comments threaten to undermine his credibility and the Church’s efforts to engage more positively with the LGBTQ+ community. The disparity between his public persona and reported private remarks highlights the ongoing struggle within the Church to reconcile its traditional doctrines with modern attitudes towards sexuality. Update Pope Apology: Pope Francis issued an apology on Tuesday following a media uproar over his use of a vulgar term to reaffirm the Catholic Church’s ban on gay priests. The apology came after Italian media reported that Francis had used the derogatory term "faggotness" in a meeting with Italian bishops on May 20, where he reiterated the Church's stance against admitting gay men into seminaries and ordaining them as priests. Vatican spokesman Matteo Bruni released a statement acknowledging the controversy and clarifying the Pope's intentions. Bruni emphasized that Pope Francis, known for his outreach to the LGBTQ+ community, never intended to offend or use homophobic language. "The pope never intended to offend or express himself in homophobic terms, and he extends his apologies to those who were offended by the use of a term that was reported by others," Bruni said. Credit: BBC 2024-05-29 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

On Memorial Day, President Joe Biden delivered a heartfelt speech at Arlington National Cemetery, paying tribute to the members of the armed forces who sacrificed their lives for the nation. His words resonated deeply with the audience, reflecting on the profound loss experienced by the families of the fallen and drawing a personal connection to his late son, Beau Biden. “We gather at this sacred place at this solemn moment to remember and to honor the sacrifice of the hundreds of thousands of women and men who have given their lives to this nation,” Biden began. “Each one, literally, a link in the chain of honor stretching back to our founding days, each one bound by a common commitment not to a place, not to a person, not to a president, but to an idea unlike any idea in human history: the idea of the United States of America.” Biden's speech was not only a tribute to the nation's fallen heroes but also a personal remembrance of his son, Beau, who passed away in 2015 from brain cancer. The President has often connected Beau's illness to his exposure to toxic chemicals during his military service in Iraq. Addressing the families of other fallen veterans, Biden acknowledged the enduring pain of their losses. “I know it hurts,” Biden said, his voice heavy with emotion. “The hurt is still real. Still raw. This week marks nine years since I lost my son Beau. The pain of his loss is with me every day, as it is with you. Still sharp. Still clear. But so is the pride I feel in his service. As if I can still hear him saying, ‘It’s my duty, Dad. It’s my duty.’” Joining Biden at the solemn event were First Lady Jill Biden, Vice President Kamala Harris, Second Gentleman Doug Emhoff, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, and Chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. CQ Brown Jr. The presence of these dignitaries underscored the significance of the occasion and the collective respect for the sacrifices made by the nation's servicemen and women. Biden used the platform to highlight his administration's commitment to veterans, emphasizing the legislative efforts made to support service members and their families. “Since I took office, I’ve signed over 30 bipartisan laws supporting servicemen, veterans, their families, caregivers, and survivors,” he stated. “Last year, the VA delivered more benefits and processed more claims than ever in our history.” The President reiterated the nation's sacred obligation to its military members. “We have many obligations as a nation,” he continued, “but we only have one truly sacred obligation: to prepare those we send to battle and to take care of their families when they come home, and when they don’t.” The contrast between Biden's somber and unifying message and the tone of his political rival, former President Donald Trump, was stark. Shortly after posting a graphic honoring the fallen on Truth Social, Trump launched a tirade against Biden and the judges overseeing his legal cases, referring to those who oppose him as “human scum.” Credit: The Hill 2024-05-29 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

During her recent visit to southern Israel, former US ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley laid the blame for the devastating Hamas massacre on October 7 squarely at the feet of Iran, Russia, and China. Touring communities heavily affected by the brutal attack, Haley, accompanied by Likud MK and former UN envoy Danny Danon, asserted that the massacre was not just an isolated act of terror by Hamas but a coordinated assault orchestrated by international powers. Standing beside the ruins of the Sderot police station, destroyed in the attack, Haley declared, “Hamas’s attack on October 7 was orchestrated by Iran. It was helped with Russian intelligence. And it was fueled by money from China. Don’t deny that.” She warned that such an assault could happen in the United States if security measures are not stringent enough. “If we are arrogant enough, this could absolutely happen in America too,” she cautioned. Haley's allegations against Iran, Russia, and China were strong and unequivocal, though she did not present direct evidence to support her claims. “China’s been funding Iran the entire time. Russia’s intelligence helped them know where everything was. Iran helped get them trained. So this isn’t Hamas. These are all murderers and accomplices. If we really mean it’s never going to happen again, we have to be honest and truthful with ourselves about who did this,” she stated. Despite the lack of concrete evidence linking Russia and China directly to the October 7 massacre, Haley's comments reflect a broader geopolitical stance. Russia, led by President Vladimir Putin, has been vocally critical of Israel since the start of the Gaza conflict, hosting Hamas officials and calling for a ceasefire without mentioning Hamas’s brutal actions. China, too, has shown diplomatic support for the Palestinian cause, recently announcing it would host Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sissi and other Arab leaders to discuss the Palestinian issue. The timing of Haley’s visit and her pointed remarks come amid growing speculation that she might seek a significant role in the Republican administration, potentially as vice president to Donald Trump. However, Haley dismissed these speculations, stating, “Trump has made it very clear that I am not” going to be his vice-presidential pick. Yet, she affirmed her support for Trump, emphasizing her commitment to a strong America and a robust alliance with Israel. Haley’s visit was orchestrated by Danny Danon, who has been actively arranging tours for foreign dignitaries to witness the aftermath of the October 7 massacre. During the visit, Haley met with survivors and local residents, reinforcing her critical view of Hamas. “We need to know that we’re going to have the backs of our allies and hold our enemies to account. I want to know that we’re going to protect freedom at all costs. We’re going to protect capitalism at all costs,” she asserted. Haley refrained from criticizing the current US administration while abroad but did not hold back on her views about President Joe Biden's Middle East policies. She argued that withholding weapons from Israel was counterproductive. “The sure way to not help Israel is to not withhold weapons,” she said. Haley linked the Gaza conflict to broader US domestic issues, particularly immigration and border security. “If we are arrogant enough, this could absolutely happen in America too,” she warned, stressing the need for stringent border control to prevent similar attacks on US soil. Danon, supporting Haley’s claims, stated that while there was clear evidence of Iranian involvement, the roles of Russia and China needed further scrutiny. “We have evidence about Iranian involvement,” he said, but when pressed about Russian and Chinese involvement, he acknowledged, “No, we have to look at the rockets and missiles that they were using. Definitely, they came from Russia and China. You have to look deeply who brought it and who gave it to them.” Haley’s remarks and visit highlight a critical stance against Hamas and its international backers. The October 7 massacre, which saw brutal attacks on Israeli civilians, is part of a long history of violence perpetuated by Hamas. The organization’s actions have consistently undermined peace efforts and exacerbated the suffering of both Israelis and Palestinians. As the international community continues to navigate the complexities of the Gaza conflict, Haley’s visit underscores the importance of identifying and confronting all entities that support and facilitate terrorism. Her pointed criticism of Hamas and its backers serves as a stark reminder of the broader geopolitical implications of terrorism and the need for a united front against those who perpetuate violence and instability. Credit: Times of Israel 2024-05-29 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In 2008, the late American climate scientist Wally Broecker warned of the dire global consequences of polar ice loss. His predictions now resonate more urgently than ever as Greenland’s ice sheets hemorrhage at an alarming rate, raising the specter of rapid sea-level rise. The Arctic Circle has been heating up at four times the global average, now exceeding temperatures from the 1980s by more than 3°C. The year 2023 saw an unprecedented loss of Antarctic sea ice. Land and ocean temperatures have skyrocketed over the past year, far surpassing what was expected during an El Niño year. Global average temperatures have breached the critical 1.5°C mark, indicating that the climate transition is in full swing. Record-breaking wildfires, catastrophic floods threatening major cities, and other extreme climate events have become the new norm, causing extensive loss of life and economic damage worldwide. Despite the mounting evidence and urgent pleas for action, meaningful progress remains elusive. Historically, global prosperity has been built on the foundation of fossil fuels. However, the grip of fossil fuel giants—heavily subsidized by governments and backed by financial institutions—prioritizes short-term profits over the planet's survival. This entrenched dependency hampers efforts to transition to a sustainable future, even as the need for change becomes increasingly critical. GDP growth is treated as sacrosanct, while climate, biodiversity, health, and social equity are sacrificed, condemning future generations to inherit a ravaged planet. As the chair of the global Climate Crisis Advisory Group, I recognize that such statements may seem like virtue signaling, particularly to those in the global south where development is still underway. This is not about denying them their pathway but about altering our stance in the developed world—and perhaps redefining our ultimate destination. On our current trajectory, civilization as we know it will vanish. If we adhere only to current commitments—net zero by 2050—some form of humanity might survive, managing the challenges of continued extreme weather events, ice loss, and sea-level and temperature rises. However, we have the agency to change this, and a thriving future is still within reach. To achieve this, we must embark on a radical journey through the “4R planet” pathway: reducing emissions, removing excess greenhouse gases (GHGs) already in the atmosphere, repairing ecosystems, and strengthening resilience against inevitable climate impacts. It is absurd to believe, as some influential fossil fuel leaders claim, that we can continue our economies based on burning fossil fuels because scientists are developing ways to capture the emissions. Recent analysis indicates that annual global GDP costs due to extreme weather events could approach 100% of global GDP by the end of the century. The transition away from fossil fuels is already underway, with renewables, hydropower, geothermal energy, distributed energy storage, electric transport, and nuclear energy operating at competitive economic levels. For example, Kenya has achieved more than 90% electricity production from renewable sources, providing a significant advantage to its economy. The global transition rate, properly led by government regulations and the removal of fossil fuel subsidies, could and should be accelerated tenfold. Implementing the four Rs must be seen as a crucial risk management cost, offsetting the projected enormous financial losses. Currently, the world emits over 50 billion tonnes of GHGs annually, expressed as CO2 equivalent. Given that we are unlikely to achieve a removal rate exceeding 10 billion tonnes per annum, reducing emissions to a very small figure is imperative. Today, GHG levels in the atmosphere exceed 500 parts per million (ppm), compared to the pre-industrial level of 275 ppm. A safe level for humanity is about 350 ppm, necessitating the removal of excess GHGs already in the atmosphere. At a removal rate of 10-20 billion tonnes per annum, this process could extend to the end of the century, and we must commence this immediately. Additionally, repairing ecosystems is essential to buy time; otherwise, the consequences of melting polar ice and ice from mountain peaks will overwhelm us before GHG levels are sufficiently reduced. Repairing the Arctic Circle will be a significant enterprise. Promising processes are under development but are hindered by inadequate funding. Two immediate projects worth supporting include covering the Arctic Sea with bright white cloud cover during the three months of the north pole summer and pumping seawater on top of the thin layer of ice formed over the sea in the polar winter to thicken it. These projects will cost billions of dollars annually, a small fraction of the costs of lives and damage avoided. Deploying such projects will require unprecedented global governance and collaboration, but if not now, then when? If not for this cause, then for what? The most vulnerable are already suffering the most from incredible changes. Investing on the necessary scale in global resilience, particularly in the global south, will not only improve lives in real-time but will also help repair the damaged trust between nations needed for a cohesive climate response. Funding the development of the four Rs will fall on advanced and emerging economies. Leaders of G20 countries must take the lead. Vision and understanding from our leaders, coupled with a global public demanding more, are essential. Beyond policy changes and investment, a seismic cultural shift is imperative to steer humanity away from self-destruction towards a just and sustainable future. We must realign our political will, economic priorities, and societal values to recognize that ecological well-being is synonymous with human well-being. We often hear that responding to the climate crisis requires sacrifices. However, this framing is flawed. We must find joy in nurturing what is around us, from nature to the things we own. Fulfillment should come from quality, not quantity, and from nature, not new possessions. We are part of the natural world and depend on it. We can choose to transition our societies into a sustainable period of ecological civilization. As we face a self-inflicted set of global challenges over the coming decades, the need for such a cultural transformation will drive action. This process must begin now. David King is the founder and chair of the global Climate Crisis Advisory Group Credit: The Guardian 2024-05-29 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Former President Donald Trump has declared his intention to crack down on pro-Palestinian protests on university campuses if he wins the 2024 presidential election. Addressing a group of wealthy donors, primarily Jewish, Trump characterized the demonstrations against Israel’s war in Gaza as part of a "radical revolution." He promised that his administration would roll back the movement by "25 or 30 years" if re-elected, according to the Washington Post, which first reported the event. “If you get me re-elected, we’re going to set that movement back 25 or 30 years,” Trump assured the donors. He also stated that his administration would expel any foreign students involved in the protests, which have recently taken the form of tented encampments on college campuses across the United States. During the meeting in New York on May 14, Trump responded to concerns from a donor who feared that students and faculty participating in the protests could eventually occupy influential positions in the US. Praising the New York police for dismantling the encampments at Columbia University, Trump urged other cities to adopt a similar approach, emphasizing, “It has to be stopped now.” Republicans have increasingly highlighted campus protests as an election issue, portraying them as a sign of "chaos" during President Joe Biden’s tenure. Congressional Republicans have held hearings on Capitol Hill to emphasize the trend, focusing on reports of antisemitism among protesters and accusing university presidents of failing to address it adequately. At a recent hearing, GOP members criticized the presidents of Northwestern and Rutgers universities for negotiating voluntary dismantlements of the encampments rather than involving the police, as Trump suggested. Trump's comments to the donors also marked a shift in his stance on Israel’s offensive in Gaza. After months of ambivalence, he expressed support for Israel's "war on terror." Previously, he had noted that Israel was "losing the PR war" due to its actions in Gaza, where more than 36,000 Palestinians have been killed in an operation launched in retaliation for a deadly Hamas assault in October, which resulted in around 1,200 Israelis being killed and another 253 being taken hostage. Speaking to Israel Hayom newspaper in March, Trump had said, “You have to finish up your war … You gotta get it done,” while also calling for Israel to "get back to peace and stop killing people." At the donor meeting, Trump, who joked about the presence of “98% of my Jewish friends,” did not mention Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu by name, reflecting his ongoing resentment over Netanyahu's recognition of Biden’s 2020 election victory. However, Trump highlighted his pro-Israel policies, including moving the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem and recognizing Israel’s annexation of the Golan Heights, which Israel captured from Syria in the 1967 Six-Day War. Trump’s pledges to his donors underscore his commitment to a hardline stance against pro-Palestinian activism and his enduring support for Israeli policies, reflecting his broader strategy to galvanize his base and secure crucial support for his re-election campaign. Credit: The Guardian 2024-05-29 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

A post has been removed that referred to the Rafah incident. This is not the topic for that. It is about "The initiative, known as the Global Women’s Coalition against Gender-Based Violence as a Weapon of War, aims to address the rampant sexual assaults committed during wartime, particularly spotlighting the atrocities perpetrated by Hamas". Another off topic post also removed. "Israeli Lawmaker Advocates for Global Action Against Wartime Sexual Violence"

Reminder that this is the topic here. Ireland, Norway, & Spain to Recognize Palestinian State Amid Ongoing Israel-Hamas Conflict

The UN Security Council is poised to hold an emergency session on Tuesday to address the recent Israeli airstrike in Rafah that reportedly killed dozens, including individuals in a displaced persons camp. This operation targeted senior Hamas operatives but tragically resulted in a fire that claimed 45 lives, according to health officials in Gaza. The incident has ignited substantial international condemnation, with numerous voices referring to it as a “massacre.” The attack, which took place overnight, aimed at two senior Hamas members in the southern Gaza border city. However, the strike also caused a fire that spread to a nearby displacement center, resulting in significant casualties. Early Tuesday, AFP journalists reported additional Israeli strikes in the same area. The global response to the Rafah strike has been one of profound outrage and condemnation. UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres voiced a strong rebuke of the violence, emphasizing the perilous situation in Gaza. "There is no safe place in Gaza. This horror must stop," Guterres posted on social media. UN Humanitarian Chief Martin Griffiths echoed this sentiment, criticizing the attack and underscoring the predictable nature of civilian casualties in such operations. "We’ve seen the consequences in last night’s utterly unacceptable attack," Griffiths stated. "To call it ‘a mistake’ is a message that means nothing for those killed, those grieving, and those trying to save lives." European leaders have also expressed their dismay. The EU’s foreign policy chief was "horrified by news" of the strike, while French President Emmanuel Macron said he was "outraged." A US National Security Council spokesperson underscored that Israel "must take every precaution possible to protect civilians." The Israeli military has announced it is launching a probe into the incident. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressed the Knesset, noting, "The deaths occurred despite our best efforts to protect civilians." The emergency session of the UN Security Council, initiated by Algeria, will address the Rafah strike's ramifications and discuss potential responses. The deadly Rafah strike occurred after a barrage of rockets was fired by Hamas at the Tel Aviv area. The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) reported that their aircraft targeted a Hamas compound in the city, resulting in the deaths of two senior Hamas operatives, Yassin Rabia and Khaled Nagar. According to the IDF, Rafah houses significant Hamas battalions and is considered a key stronghold for the group. Gaza’s civil defense agency reported that the strike ignited a fire near a facility of the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, UNRWA, affecting a displacement center in northwestern Rafah. Israeli officials have informed the US that they believe the fire was caused by shrapnel igniting a fuel tank located approximately 100 meters from the area targeted in the airstrike. The US has stated it has no way to validate or reject Israel’s version of events and is awaiting the outcome of the Israeli investigation. Credit: Times of Israel 2024-05-28 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Please remain on topic, this is not about the African National Congress or Algeria

Three chatbots stand out for their capabilities and user accessibility: OpenAI's ChatGPT, Microsoft's Copilot, and Google's Gemini. These tools are best approached not as mere information desks but as tutors or assistants, each offering unique features tailored to different needs. Understanding how to use these AI tools effectively can significantly enhance your productivity and creativity. While getting started with any of these chatbots is relatively easy, knowing when and how to use them for optimal results can still be tricky. Each of these chatbots is designed to create, edit, and summarize content, making them versatile assistants for a variety of tasks. ChatGPT, for instance, works well for most general tasks. It can help you write a resume, create a basic recipe with the ingredients you have, summarize long articles, turn text into presentations, or even create itineraries for vacations. It's also great for sparking creativity or overcoming writer's block. Some people even use it to help communicate with their kids. On the other hand, Google's Gemini has access to more timely and updated information, making it particularly useful for tasks requiring the latest data. Copilot shines in work-related tasks, leveraging its integration with Microsoft 365, which includes access to emails, documents, calendar entries, and more. For those looking to take full advantage of these tools, most free versions are good enough. However, subscribing to their premium versions for around $20 per month unlocks additional features. Copilot, for example, integrates with your Microsoft Graph, accessing all the data within your Microsoft 365 suite. Gemini Advanced allows you to summarize content or create new content from your Gmail, Google Docs, and Google Drive, with an offer to try it free for two months. Additionally, while ChatGPT has its own GPT store, Copilot lets you integrate third-party plugins from services like Shopify, OpenTable, or Kayak, and Gemini allows you to use extensions like Google Flights and Google Hotels. Accessing these tools is straightforward. ChatGPT and Copilot both have free iPhone and Android apps, while Google's Gemini is available as an app on Android and can be accessed on iOS through the Google app by tapping the Gemini icon. When using these chatbots, the requests you make or questions you ask are called prompts. Effective prompts should be specific and can include requests for responses in a particular tone, for a certain audience, or even for a specific number of words. For instance, you might ask, "Explain the theory of relativity to me in 100 words. Act as a friendly scientist and answer as if I'm ten years old." Interestingly, studies have shown that you'll get better results if you're polite in your requests. However, it's important to acknowledge that all current generative AI chatbots are prone to producing inaccuracies and historical untruths, a phenomenon known as "hallucinating." While search engine algorithms have been progressively improving in showing more reliable sources, chatbots can set us back by confidently delivering misinformation. This is particularly disconcerting because, by their nature, these chatbots are designed to generate content, which sometimes includes fabrications. Moreover, any prompts you enter could potentially be used to train these chatbots. This means users should be cautious with sensitive personal details and confidential work information. Some services, especially paid subscriptions, offer more privacy. Google, for instance, assures that personal content from Workspace won't be used to train Gemini's model or viewed by human reviewers, even in the free version. Looking ahead, the potential of AI is both exciting and intimidating. Soon, these tools will not only be able to answer questions and create or summarize content but also act on your behalf. This advancement could revolutionize how we interact with technology, making these AI tools even more integral to our daily lives. Credit: AXIOS 2024-05-28 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

"The Apprentice," a highly anticipated biopic about former President Donald Trump's ascent in the real estate world, failed to clinch any awards at the Cannes Film Festival. Directed by Iranian Danish filmmaker Ali Abbasi, the film stars Sebastian Stan as the young Trump and Jeremy Strong as his mentor and attorney, Roy Cohn. Despite receiving an eight-minute standing ovation at its premiere, the film did not win any accolades, with the festival's top prize, the Palme d’Or, going to Sean Baker's romantic drama "Anora," set in New York. "The Apprentice" delves into Trump's early career and personal relationships, portraying his interactions with Roy Cohn and his first wife, Ivana Trump, in a controversial light. The film's depiction has led to significant backlash from Trump and his associates. Trump's attorney issued a cease-and-desist letter to the filmmakers, claiming the movie was a "concoction of lies" and defamatory towards the former president. The letter threatened legal action if the distribution and marketing of the film were not halted immediately. “If you do not immediately cease and desist all distribution and marketing of this libelous farce, we will be forced to pursue all appropriate legal remedies,” the letter stated. This move followed earlier warnings from Trump spokesperson Steven Cheung, who criticized the film as "pure malicious defamation" and suggested it deserved to be discarded. "This ‘film’ is pure malicious defamation, should not see the light of day, and doesn’t even deserve a place in the straight-to-DVD section of a bargain bin at a soon-to-be-closed discount movie store, it belongs in a dumpster fire,” Cheung stated. Despite the controversy, the film’s producers defended their work, describing it as a "fair and balanced portrait of the former president." They expressed their desire for audiences to view the film and form their own opinions. "We want everyone to see it and then decide," they told Variety. Adding to the turmoil, Dan Synder, an investor in the film through the company Kinematics and an ally of Trump, reportedly expressed dissatisfaction with the final product. According to anonymous sources cited by Variety, Synder was furious about the film's outcome and attempted to stop its release by involving Kinematics’s legal team. The biopic's failure to win awards at Cannes, coupled with the legal and public relations battles it has sparked, underscores the contentious nature of its subject matter. As "The Apprentice" moves forward, it faces a landscape fraught with potential legal challenges and polarized public opinion. Credit: The Hill 2024-05-28 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

A recent study has revealed that transgender men taking testosterone to transition from female to male are experiencing "postmenopausal" symptoms typically seen in older women. This phenomenon is causing significant health issues, including bladder and bowel dysfunctions, which are under-researched and under-reported. The study, conducted by experts who analyzed 68 transgender men undergoing testosterone treatment, found that a staggering 95 percent had developed pelvic floor dysfunction. Participants, ranging from 18 to an average age of 28, exhibited bladder and bowel symptoms usually expected in women post-menopause. These symptoms included incontinence, frequent toilet visits, bed-wetting, constipation, and an inability to control stools or gas. Approximately 87 percent of the participants reported urinary symptoms such as incontinence, frequent urination, and nocturia (urinating during the night), while 74 percent faced bowel issues like constipation and fecal incontinence. Sexual dysfunction was also prevalent, with 53 percent of the participants experiencing difficulties, including orgasm disorders and pain during intercourse. The rate of urinary incontinence among transgender men was found to be three times higher than that of women, affecting about one in four compared to eight percent of the general female population. These individuals also suffered from symptoms like burning sensations, hesitancy, urgency, and difficulty urinating, along with defecation issues. Elaine Miller, a pelvic health physiotherapist and member of the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy, noted that many women are unaffected by incontinence until menopause, after which it becomes a common issue. She stated, "That appears to be exactly the same trajectory for female people who take cross-sex hormones, but there hasn’t been much in the way of research." Miller has worked with around 20 detransitioners seeking help for pelvic floor issues and emphasized the stigma and embarrassment surrounding incontinence, which often leads to the minimization of the problem. Miller highlighted the profound impact of incontinence on young people’s lives, affecting their ability to exercise, maintain intimate relationships, travel, and work. She stressed the importance of proper discussion of these risks within gender clinics, expressing concern that almost all female individuals taking cross-sex hormones could face these problems. The study pointed out that the menopausal process, characterized by loss of muscle mass and body strength, affects the pelvic floor and can lead to incontinence. Women who undergo early menopause are offered Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) on the NHS to prevent conditions like coronary heart disease, osteoporosis, and dementia. However, taking testosterone accelerates the menopausal process by stopping ovarian function and reducing estrogen production, which can exacerbate these issues. Testosterone is known to impact muscle mass and hair loss and has been associated with blood clots and gallstones, but its effects on pelvic floor issues and incontinence have not been extensively researched. Miller noted that the treatment for trans men experiencing these symptoms is similar to that for postmenopausal women, which seems incongruous given their young age. Treatments involve addressing constipation, educating on normal bladder and bowel functions, and pelvic floor exercises. Kate Barker, chief executive of the LGB Alliance, criticized the lack of thorough consideration given to the long-term consequences of these treatments. She highlighted testimonies from detransitioners at their annual conference, describing the lasting impact of decisions made at a young age, including permanent sterilization and loss of sexual function. Barker emphasized that these issues were officially acknowledged by the Cass Review, which led to the NHS halting the prescription of puberty blockers outside clinical trials and pausing cross-sex hormones for under-18s. The review called for more careful treatment of individuals under 25 and prompted a review of adult clinics. The authors of the study, led by Lyvia Maria Bezerra da Silva at the Federal University of Pernambuco, Brazil, called for more research into the long-term effects of testosterone on transgender men. They noted a high frequency of pelvic floor dysfunction symptoms among participants and stressed the need for a deeper understanding of the long-term impacts of testosterone treatment. The findings were published in the International Urogynecology Journal, highlighting the urgent need for further research and better patient education on the potential risks associated with cross-sex hormone therapy. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-05-28 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

China has showcased its machine gun-wielding robot dogs during a significant 15-day military exercise in Cambodia. The event, which marked the largest-ever joint drill between the two nations, featured a host of advanced unmanned vehicles, with the robotic dogs taking center stage. The exercise, known as "Golden Dragon," involved approximately 2,000 troops, including 760 Chinese soldiers, and took place in central Kampong Chhnang Province and off the coast of Preah Sihanouk Province. The robotic dogs, equipped with back-mounted machine guns, were a major highlight of the exercises. Although the drones were not live-fired, their impressive mobility was demonstrated to Cambodian military officials and journalists. This demonstration underscored the increasing role of robotics and unmanned technologies in modern warfare, a domain both China and the United States are keenly contesting. Cambodian armed forces commander-in-chief, Vong Pisen, praised the robotic dogs, stating that they would "enhance the capabilities" of both armies in combating terrorism. This sentiment was echoed by other military officials who viewed the technology as a significant step forward in military innovation. Despite the display of camaraderie and technological sharing, underlying geopolitical tensions were evident. Cambodian leaders have consistently claimed that no foreign military base would be allowed on their soil. However, this assertion seems at odds with recent developments at the Ream naval base near Sihanoukville. This base, which has been under significant renovation with Chinese assistance, hosted two Chinese warships in December, marking the first visit since the expansion began. The Cambodian defense ministry confirmed that these ships were there to train Cambodian naval personnel in preparation for the Golden Dragon exercises. A spokesperson clarified that the Chinese vessels were conducting tests at the Ream Naval Base, which China is upgrading for Cambodia. This statement aimed to dispel concerns about Chinese troops being permanently stationed at the base. Nevertheless, the arrival of a third Chinese warship in Sihanoukville on the eve of the exercises further fueled speculation about Beijing's strategic intentions in the region. Washington has expressed growing concern over these developments, fearing that Ream could serve as a strategic foothold for China near the disputed South China Sea and the Gulf of Thailand. The U.S. worries that Beijing's influence in Cambodia, bolstered by significant investments, could alter the balance of power in the region. Cambodia's close relationship with China, underscored by billions of dollars in Chinese investments, has been a source of unease for U.S. officials. This anxiety is heightened by the belief that unmanned technologies, such as the robotic dogs showcased in the exercises, will be crucial in future conflicts. The robotic dogs, reportedly made by the Chinese company Unitree, are available online for thousands of U.S. dollars. During the Golden Dragon drills, these quadrupeds were kept "on the leash" and did not perform live-fire demonstrations, according to reports from Agence France-Presse. The use of weapon-wielding machines is not new in the defense industry. The U.S. Marine Corps, for instance, tested a rocket launcher mounted on a robotic goat last year. Similarly, Ghost Robotics' mechanical dogs were utilized in an exercise at Nellis Air Force Base in Nevada in 2020, and some have since been deployed to Cape Cod Space Force Station in Massachusetts. While it remains unclear when China's armed robotic dogs will see action in actual combat, their potential applications are vast. These machines could be used to transport supplies, scout dangerous areas, act as decoys, and more. The demonstration in Cambodia highlighted the growing role of robotics in military strategy and the ongoing race between global powers to dominate this frontier. The first Golden Dragon drills took place in 2016, and since then, the scale and complexity of the exercises have increased. Notably, in early 2017, Cambodia canceled the Angkor Sentinel joint exercise with U.S. forces, which had been conducted for seven years, signaling a shift towards closer military ties with China. The 2024 exercises, described as the largest of their kind, were primarily funded by China, further indicating the deepening military cooperation between the two countries. Thong Solimo, a spokesman for the Cambodian army, emphasized the significance of the drills, noting that they included live-fire exercises, anti-terrorism training, and humanitarian and rescue drills. The participation of 14 warships, helicopters, and nearly seventy armored vehicles and tanks underscored the comprehensive nature of the training. Credit: AXIOS 2024-05-28 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Alina Habba, attorney for former President Donald Trump, expressed her unease over the jury in Trump's hush-money trial not being sequestered during the Memorial Day weekend. Habba suggested that the jurors might have been subjected to outside influences that could impact their impartiality as they prepare for the trial's closing arguments this week. “They should have been sequestered, because, in my opinion, these jurors are handling something that is completely unprecedented and unwarranted in America,” Habba asserted. She voiced her concerns about the jurors' exposure to media and discussions during the holiday, which could potentially affect their judgment. Habba emphasized that if jurors were exposed to news sources like MSNBC or CNN, referred to disparagingly by Trump as "MSDNC," they might not receive unbiased information. "If they’re left-wing and they’re watching MSDNC, as my client calls it, [MSNBC] or CNN, they’re not going to get fair news," she stated. The case in question involves 12 New York jurors who will soon deliberate on whether to convict Trump on 34 criminal counts related to falsifying business records. These charges are linked to reimbursements made to Trump's former attorney Michael Cohen, who paid $130,000 to adult film actress Stormy Daniels in October 2016 to silence her about an alleged affair with Trump. Trump has pleaded not guilty to these charges and has consistently denied having an affair with Daniels. Last Tuesday, Trump's defense team rested their case without calling the former president to testify. The jurors were then dismissed until the upcoming Tuesday, when closing statements are set to begin. Following these statements, jury deliberations will commence. Judge Juan Merchan indicated that the delay in closing arguments until Tuesday was due to some unspecified “issues,” though he did not elaborate on what these might be. Habba elaborated on her concerns, noting that the holiday weekend allowed jurors to interact with friends and family who might hold strong opinions about Trump. She feared that such interactions could lead to biased decisions. “I have serious concerns. If they’re left-wing and they’re watching MSDNC, as my client calls it, [MSNBC] or CNN, they’re not going to get fair news,” Habba reiterated. She also mentioned the risk of jurors discussing the case at social gatherings, which might reinforce negative perceptions about Trump. Highlighting the potential consequences of these interactions, Habba remarked, “I have worries about them going back to whatever friends might have Trump derangement syndrome, forgetting all sense of reality, and coming back and sitting in that box and saying, you know what, I have got to take one for the [Democratic National Committee].” She stressed the importance of jurors making their decisions based solely on the law and facts presented during the trial. “I want law to [be] fact, because, if we can get that, we will win, we will not just get a hung jury, we will get an acquittal. So, let’s see,” she concluded. The hush-money trial has attracted significant public and media attention due to the high-profile nature of the case and the involvement of a former president. Trump's legal team has consistently argued that the charges are politically motivated and lack merit. The case's outcome could have substantial implications for Trump's political future and the broader legal landscape concerning former presidents. As the trial progresses, the jurors' ability to remain impartial and unaffected by external influences will be crucial in determining the final verdict. Habba's concerns underscore the challenges faced in high-profile cases where media coverage and public opinion can potentially sway the judicial process. Whether the jury can deliver a fair and unbiased verdict remains to be seen as the trial nears its conclusion with the upcoming closing arguments and subsequent deliberations. Credit: The Hill 2024-05-28 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In a determined effort to break the silence surrounding sexual violence in conflict zones, Shelly Tal Meron, a freshman lawmaker from the Yesh Atid party, has launched an initiative to establish an international coalition to combat the use of rape as a weapon of war. The initiative, known as the Global Women’s Coalition against Gender-Based Violence as a Weapon of War, aims to address the rampant sexual assaults committed during wartime, particularly spotlighting the atrocities perpetrated by Hamas. During a conference held at the Knesset last week, Tal Meron highlighted the urgency of acknowledging and addressing wartime sexual violence. Opposition Leader Yair Lapid also spoke at the conference, condemning those who disregard the severe testimonies of sexual abuse by Hamas terrorists. “Throughout history, there has been a conspiracy of silence surrounding sexual violence during war,” Lapid stated. He emphasized that this silence has allowed such crimes to continue unchecked. “We came here today to cry out against silence,” he declared. The conference, held on May 20, was packed with attendees, including delegates from various countries such as France, Ireland, Denmark, and the UK. Co-sponsored by ELNET, an organization fostering ties between Israel and Europe, the event aimed to garner international support for recognizing and combating sexual violence as a war crime. Tal Meron stressed that while international law already acknowledges sexual violence as a crime of war, there is a significant need to change cultural and political perceptions of such violations. “We are declaring today the establishment of an important historical coalition, of acknowledging sexual violence as a crime of war,” Tal Meron announced. She is determined to ensure that the international community not only recognizes but actively addresses the use of sexual violence in conflicts. The catalyst for this initiative was the horrific attack by Hamas on October 7, when thousands of terrorists invaded Israel, killing 1,200 people and taking 252 hostages. Among the atrocities committed were widespread sexual assaults on Israeli women. Testimonies from freed hostages revealed that women held captive in Gaza were subjected to regular sexual abuse, treated by their captors like “dolls.” Israel Prize-winning international law and human rights expert Cochav Elkayam-Levy also addressed the conference, pointing out the inadequacies of current international conventions in dealing with the resurgence of gender-based violence in conflicts from the Middle East to Ukraine. Elkayam-Levy is advocating for the recognition of a new crime against humanity, which she terms “kinocide,” defined as the deliberate weaponization or destruction of families. In a recent opinion piece, Elkayam-Levy and former Canadian justice minister Irwin Cotler argued that existing legal systems are ill-equipped to address the scale and brutality of Hamas’s actions. “In assessing the legal ramifications of Hamas’s actions, it becomes apparent that international criminal law lacks the specific mechanisms to confront the extent of the brutality and systematicity employed on October 7th,” they wrote. Shelly Tal Meron’s drive to raise awareness and build a coalition stems from her exposure to the atrocities committed on October 7. As a fluent English speaker and former spokesperson for the Israeli Air Force, she has taken on the role of informing the international community about the crimes committed by Hamas. “I have to be the voice of women who have no voice,” Tal Meron said, recounting her travels around Europe to share the Israeli story. Domestically, Tal Meron has established the Knesset caucus on victims of sexual and gender violence in the war against Hamas, co-chaired with Likud lawmaker Tsega Melaku. During a recent meeting of the caucus, concerns were raised about the possibility of hostages returning pregnant with the children of Hamas terrorists, adding another layer of trauma and complexity to their ordeal. Tal Meron is working to draft domestic legislation to handle the aftermath of such crimes and is organizing another gathering in Paris to further the coalition’s efforts. She hopes to create a declaration of principles for countries to sign, committing to the fight against sexual violence in conflicts. French Minister for Gender Equality Aurore Bergé has already expressed support, stating that Israel can count on France’s determination to combat this scourge. Despite the positive response from international partners, Tal Meron is critical of the response from Israeli leaders. She highlighted the disparity in the treatment of hostage families, noting that some have not received adequate support from the government. “When it comes to finances, a lot of the families of the hostages stopped working. Their whole lives stopped. They need help. They get some help. It’s not enough,” she said. As Tal Meron continues to advocate for victims of wartime sexual violence, her efforts underscore the importance of international cooperation and the need for robust legal frameworks to address such heinous crimes. Through her work, she aims to ensure that the voices of victims are heard and that perpetrators are held accountable, ultimately striving to end the silence surrounding sexual violence in war. Related Topics: Chilling Confessions Father and Son Describe Sexual Crimes During Hamas Invasion New Very Disturbing Video Released of 5 Female Hostages being abducted by Hamas on Oct 7th Israeli nurse abducted on October 7 kidnapped by Palestinian CIVILIANS then sold to Hamas UN finds evidence of rape on Oct. 7 and after; Israel: They tried to downplay issue Credit: Times of Israel 2024-05-28 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Our skies are becoming increasingly turbulent as climate change progresses, making the need to understand and predict turbulence more urgent than ever. Researchers are now proposing that birds, which often encounter choppy skies, could provide valuable clues to help address this issue. When we look up, the sky may appear calm and still, but the air is always in motion. It flows like water, with eddies and currents that can be smooth and serene or tumultuous and violent. Turbulence, one of the most unpredictable weather phenomena, is becoming more common as the planet warms. This poses significant risks to aviation, including potential injuries, deaths, and structural damage to aircraft. Just recently, a Singapore Airlines flight from London encountered severe turbulence, resulting in 31 injuries and one fatality. Passengers aboard the Boeing 777-300ER reported that the plane began to tilt and shake before dropping suddenly, causing people and objects to be thrown around the cabin. In another case almost immediately after that turbulence on Doha-Dublin flight left 12 injured. The pressing question is whether there could be better ways to predict and cope with turbulence. Some researchers believe that the answers might lie in studying birds. Birds frequently navigate choppy skies, and while only a few species reach the cruising altitudes of commercial aircraft, studying their responses at lower altitudes could provide insights. Emily Shepard, an expert in bird flight and air flow at Swansea University in Wales, suggests that understanding how birds adapt to extreme turbulence could help meteorologists build better predictive models and inform aircraft design, especially for smaller aircraft and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) operating in urban environments. According to a 2024 study, aircraft encounter moderate to severe turbulence approximately 68,000 times each year. Turbulence, defined as an irregular motion of the air caused by eddies and vertical currents, is associated with weather events such as fronts, wind shear, and thunderstorms. It can range from a few uncomfortable bumps to chaotic rolls, pitches, and yaws that can throw an aircraft out of control. Modern aircraft are equipped with sophisticated weather radar systems that allow pilots to identify and navigate around areas of turbulence. Paul Williams, an atmospheric scientist at the University of Reading, states, "We can successfully predict around 75% of turbulence up to 18 hours ahead." However, certain types of turbulence, such as clear-air turbulence, are harder to detect. Clear-air turbulence occurs at high altitudes where aircraft cruise in seemingly calm skies. It is invisible to the naked eye and undetectable by onboard sensors or satellites, posing a significant risk as it can strike without warning. Clear-air turbulence is becoming more common due to climate change. Williams explains, "In simple terms, climate change is increasing the temperature difference between the warm and cold air masses that collide to form the jet stream in the upper atmosphere. This effect is making the jet stream less stable and allowing more turbulence to break out." Meteorologists are now seeking to develop better forecasting methods using computer modeling. Interestingly, birds' experiences with the winds could provide valuable data for these models. Previous studies have shown that animal movements can help determine the strength of thermal updrafts, wind direction, and wind speed. Researchers from Swansea University believe that birds' interactions with turbulence could help improve predictions. Birds often migrate thousands of miles, with wind speed, direction, and turbulence dictating their routes and energy expenditure. Frigate birds, for example, rely on thermals and wind to stay aloft for months and can fly at extreme altitudes of up to 13,000 feet. They often catch strong updrafts in mountainous cumulus clouds, navigating incredibly turbulent environments with remarkable control. Shepard and her colleagues at Swansea University's Laboratory for Animal Movement aim to "visualize the invisible" by studying how birds respond to turbulence. By equipping birds with tags that measure GPS, barometric pressure, and acceleration, researchers can map the air's behavior during flights. This approach could be more cost-effective and comprehensive than using sensors fitted to aircraft, as birds can fly in conditions that planes cannot. In one study from 2018 to 2019, Shepard's team flew an ultralight aircraft alongside a flock of homing pigeons. They measured turbulence levels during the birds' flights using data loggers attached to the pigeons. Despite encountering turbulence that forced the pilot to land, the pigeons returned to their lofts without issue, indicating their superior ability to cope with high levels of turbulence. Bird-borne sensors could provide continuous data collection on air turbulence, much like seal-borne sensors used to measure ocean salinity and temperature. Shepard notes, "People are already equipping animals with tags for lots of different reasons and in lots of different environments. They're effectively sampling in the environment all the time." Birds could serve as mobile meteorological sensors, offering valuable data about the turbulence they encounter along their flight paths. In another study from 2020, Shepard and her colleagues followed the flight of Andean condors, the world's heaviest soaring birds. They documented the condors' altitude gains and recorded each wingbeat. The data revealed that the condors spent 99% of their flight time in glide mode without flapping, covering vast distances with minimal energy expenditure. This insight into how soaring birds exploit thermals could inform the programming of autonomous flying vehicles. Understanding how gulls navigate turbulence in urban environments could also help plan flight paths for UAVs and drones. Urban areas are particularly turbulent due to obstacles that disturb air flow, posing challenges for low-altitude flights near buildings. Shepard highlights that urbanization is contributing to more turbulent skies, affecting both animal flight and human aviation. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg has sounded the alarm on climate change's impact on transportation, warning that it is already affecting modes of transit. Speaking on CBS's "Face the Nation," Buttigieg said, "The reality is, the effects of climate change are already upon us in terms of our transportation. We've seen that in the form of everything from heat waves that shouldn’t statistically even be possible, threatening to melt the cables of transit systems in the Pacific Northwest, to hurricane seasons becoming more and more extreme and indications that turbulence is up by about 15 percent. That means assessing anything and everything that we can do about it." Buttigieg's comments came shortly after the deadly turbulence incident on the Singapore Airlines flight, highlighting the increasing need for preparedness and adaptation to the changing climate. While extreme incidents remain rare, the rise in turbulence due to climate change necessitates evolving policies, technology, and infrastructure to ensure safety in aviation. Research from the University of Reading has shown that severe in-air turbulence increased by 55% between 1979 and 2020, a trend consistent with the effects of climate change. As our climate continues to evolve, so too must our approaches to understanding and mitigating the risks associated with turbulent skies. By learning from birds and improving predictive models, we can better navigate the challenges posed by increasingly turbulent air travel. Credit: BBC & The Hill 2024-05-28 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

German security services uncovered a plot by a Hamas terrorist cell to attack the Israeli embassy in Berlin and a U.S. military base in Germany. This information was reported by the German newspaper Welt am Sonntag. The plot came to light with the arrest of a suspect of Lebanese origin in Berlin last December. The suspect was found to possess target locations on his smartphone and has been accused by prosecutors of scouting for places to hide weapons for the terrorist organization. According to German authorities, the suspect received direct instructions from Hamas officials based in Lebanon. This revelation aligns with a statement issued by the Israeli Prime Minister's office in January, which highlighted that Hamas operates a network of agents across Europe. This network, directed by terrorist leaders in Lebanon, aims to target Jewish and Israeli sites abroad. The German security services' swift action in apprehending the suspect has potentially averted a major terrorist attack. This has led to heightened vigilance and the implementation of increased security measures around potential targets. The German authorities are continuing their investigations to dismantle any remaining elements of the terrorist cell and prevent future threats. The revelation of this plot underscores the persistent threat posed by Hamas beyond the Middle East, as the group seeks to expand its operations and target sites associated with Israel and its allies. The German government's proactive measures have been crucial in countering this threat and ensuring the safety of its citizens and diplomatic missions. Further investigations are ongoing to ensure that any remaining threats are neutralized and that similar plots are prevented in the future. Credit: Times of Israel 2024-05-28 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer has launched his first major speech of the General Election campaign, presenting himself as the antidote to what he describes as 14 years of Conservative "chaos" that has led to a crisis in the UK's national culture. Speaking in the Tory stronghold of Lancing, West Sussex, Starmer emphasized the election as a critical decision point for the nation, framing it as a question of "whose side are you on." Starmer's speech was a direct appeal to working people, promising to restore trust in British politics and deliver economic stability and national security. He positioned himself as a leader whose values and character are deeply shaped by a lifelong commitment to serving the interests of working people. “Elections are about more than individual changes and policies, but about values, temperament, character, and a bigger question: whose side are you on? Who do you hold in your mind’s eye when you are making decisions?" Starmer asked. "Everything I have fought for has been shaped by my life, every change I have made to this party has been about a cause, the answer to that question, the only answer: The working people of this country delivering on their aspirations, earning their respect, serving their interests.” Despite Labour's significant lead in opinion polls, Starmer acknowledged that many voters remain uncertain about supporting his party. He directly addressed these doubts, stating, “I know there are countless people who haven’t decided how they’ll vote in this election. They’re fed up with the failure, chaos, and division of the Tories, but they still have questions about us: has Labour changed enough? Do I trust them with my money, our borders, our security? My answer is yes, you can, because I have changed this party, permanently.” In a pointed critique of the Conservative record, Starmer highlighted the struggles faced by working people in the UK. He argued that opportunity in Britain has long been skewed against them, and that the current government has exacerbated this imbalance. “For a long time now, working people have believed opportunity in Britain is stacked against them. But now we are at a dangerous new point, close to crossing a Rubicon of trust, not just in politics but in many of the institutions that are meant to serve and protect the British people.” Starmer painted a bleak picture of the current state of trust in the UK, citing declining living standards and a perceived erosion of public standards by the Conservative government. “When you put that alongside a Government that over 14 years has left living standards in this country worse than when they found them, that has torched any semblance of standards in public life, Westminster parties that broke the rules they put in place to save lives and rules they expected you to follow but ignored themselves, then you get a crisis in nothing less than who we are as a nation.” Starmer also took aim at Prime Minister Rishi Sunak’s recent proposal for a new form of compulsory national service, dismissing it as a “teenage Dad’s Army.” This quip underscored his broader argument that the Conservative government is out of touch with the realities and needs of ordinary British people. In his speech, Starmer sought to reassure voters that Labour is committed to responsible governance and protecting the nation's security. He portrayed Labour under his leadership as a party that has undergone significant transformation, one that can be trusted with the nation’s finances, borders, and security. As the General Election campaign heats up, Starmer’s message is clear: he positions himself and the Labour Party as the agents of change needed to end years of Conservative mismanagement and to restore trust and opportunity for working people across the UK. Credit: The Standard 2024-05-28 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Welcome to the Twisted world of 2024 - when UN Employees get to take part in the largest massacre of Jews since the Holocaust, and in return receive a salary and complete impunity.

Josh Frydenberg will present a Sky News documentary on anti-Semitism Bad things happen when good people stay silent. This stark lesson rings true as Australia grapples with an alarming surge in anti-Semitism since October 7 last year. The explosion of hatred targeting the Jewish community has been met with a shameful lack of response from our leaders, universities, and Human Rights Commission. This descent into darkness must stop now. Since the atrocities committed by Hamas on October 7, where over 1,200 innocent people were brutally murdered, anti-Semitic incidents in Australia have skyrocketed. The gravity of the situation is clear. Our leaders need to wake up and take strong, decisive action before it’s too late. This is the lesson of history. Those who fail to heed it are doomed to repeat it. This is why I joined Sky News for the documentary "Never Again: The Fight Against Anti-Semitism." I wanted to use my voice to ring the alarm bell and show my fellow Australians the damage being done to our country. Anti-Semitism is a light sleeper, but after October 7, it is violently awake. Nowhere was this more apparent than on the steps of the Sydney Opera House. The horrific violence perpetrated by Hamas halfway around the world sparked a mob in Sydney chanting “F..k the Jews.” This was followed by a riot in Caulfield, a largely Jewish suburb in Melbourne, triggered by false claims that Jews had burned down a local burger shop. Jewish families were left frightened in their homes, unable to visit their place of worship on the Sabbath. The doxxing of 600 Jewish creatives, including award-winning artist Deborah Conway, destroyed lives and livelihoods as performances were canceled, businesses vandalized, and death threats made. Their only sin was to support each other after facing abandonment from employers and fellow artists. The list of anti-Semitic incidents goes on: boycotting businesses simply because the owner is Jewish, daily harassment leading Jewish schools to advise students against wearing uniforms or symbols for fear of safety. How did we get here? The answer lies in the reckless indifference of our leaders. While I do not believe our Prime Minister, premiers, chancellors, vice-chancellors, police commissioners, or Human Rights Commissioners are anti-Semites, their inaction has been telling. They respect the enormous contributions Jewish Australians have made to our democracy and society, but their failure to confront anti-Semitism has been glaring. University leaders, for instance, have equivocated instead of acting. They wrote to the Attorney-General seeking legal advice on the phrase “Palestine will be free from the river to the sea,” a call for the abolition of the State of Israel. Australia’s foremost intelligence and security expert, Dennis Richardson, described it as a “very violent statement,” a sentiment echoed by the Prime Minister. Yet, university leaders hesitated. It was galling to hear the vice-chancellor of the University of Sydney, Mark Scott, defend such expressions as free speech, comparing them to demonstrations during the Vietnam War and nuclear disarmament. He misses the point. Free speech does not grant a free pass to hate speech, intimidation, and harassment directed at a particular group. The vice-chancellor’s reluctance to involve the police, citing American campus experiences, further demeans his role. The police were called to US campuses to reassert authority after violent anti-Semites ran amok. Appeasing the mob has only emboldened those seeking to disrupt and destroy. The documentary not only explores the recent events in Australia but also highlights the personal impact on many, young and old. Holocaust survivors share their fears, drawing frightening parallels between their past experiences and current events. Their testimonies are a stark reminder of the failure of our leaders to combat rising anti-Semitism. Australia’s longstanding relationship with Israel, traditionally marked by bipartisan support, is also under threat. Since October 7, Australia has failed to support Israel consistently, a fellow democracy in its hour of need. This support is crucial for security, intelligence, and enduring people-to-people links, transcending current political leadership. The events of October 7, much like 9/11, have ushered in a period of instability and conflict, lifting the lid on ancient hatreds. To counter the violence and protect our social cohesion, our leaders must reset their approach. More action and less talk are required. Defeating anti-Semitism is not just in the Jewish community’s interest; it is in Australia’s interest. The anti-Semitic incidents on our streets and campuses since October 7 are contrary to our values and our pride in being Australian. It’s time for our leaders to stand up, take risks, and show true leadership. The descent into darkness must stop—now. Credit: The Australian 2024-05-27 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In a first major interview since he announced he would request arrest warrants for Benjamin Netanyahu, Yoav Gallant and three Hamas leaders, ICC chief prosecutor Karim Khan dismisses as “nonsense” accusations that he was equating the actions of Israel and the terror group. “I am not saying that Israel with its democracy and its supreme court is akin to Hamas, of course not. I couldn’t be clearer, Israel has every right to protect its population and to get the hostages back. But nobody has a license to commit war crimes or crimes against humanity. The means define us,” As someone with personal experience of persecution, Khan understands the importance of impartiality and the rule of law. “What this comes down to is, ‘Do we want to live in a world where law is applied equally or one where we close our eyes and turn away because of our allegiances?’” Khan stated emphatically. He added, “Of course one is aware that Gaza is on the faultline of international relations but that cannot be an excuse not to try everywhere to put the rights of victims first. Whether those are the rights of Jewish victims or Palestinians, whether Muslim, Christian or of no belief, we must have the same moral outrage, love, care and concern—the point is they are all human beings.” On Monday, Khan’s announcement accused Netanyahu and Gallant, along with Hamas leaders Yahya Sinwar, Mohammed Diab Ibrahim al-Masri (also known as Mohammed Deif), and Ismail Haniyeh, of crimes against humanity. This marks the first time the ICC has targeted a sitting western-backed leader, igniting a wave of international outrage. Both UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and US President Joe Biden criticized the decision, with Sunak calling it “deeply unhelpful” and Biden labeling it “outrageous.” Khan responded to his critics by saying, “Our job is not to make friends. It’s to do our job whether we are applauded or condemned. We have to underline the equal worth of every child, every woman, every civilian in a world that is increasingly polarized and if we don’t do that, what’s the point of us?” The warrants, pending approval by the ICC’s judges, could impose significant constraints on Israel’s leadership. Unlike the International Court of Justice (ICJ), which lacks enforcement mechanisms, an ICC warrant would obligate all 124 signatory countries to arrest Netanyahu if he enters their territories. This includes key Israeli allies within the European Union. “If states don’t step up, it has massive implications,” Khan warned. “The ICC is their child—I am just the nanny or hired help. They have a choice to look after this child or be responsible for its abandonment.” Khan’s decision follows visits to Israel, where he witnessed the aftermath of the October 7 attack and met with victims' relatives. He carries a blue wristband with the slogan “Bring Them Home” and the silver dog-tag of Kfir Bibas, a nine-month-old baby who Hamas claims was killed by an IDF air strike but there has been no confirmation of this. “This would break anyone’s heart,” he said. “Kfir was just nine months old. But there’s no monopoly on suffering. There are Palestinian babies dying and we cannot have double standards.” The charges against Netanyahu and Gallant include causing extermination and/or murder, deliberately targeting civilians in conflict, and using starvation as a weapon of war—a first for the ICC. Hamas leaders are accused of extermination, murder, taking hostages, and sexual assault. Despite the severity of the charges, Khan was careful to clarify, “I am not saying that Israel with its democracy and its supreme court is akin to Hamas, of course not. I couldn’t be clearer, Israel has every right to protect its population and to get the hostages back. But nobody has a license to commit war crimes or crimes" Khan recounted a conversation with a senior official who questioned how Israel could act given the unknown whereabouts of hostages. Khan compared the situation to Britain’s response to IRA terrorism, saying, “There were attempts to kill Margaret Thatcher, Airey Neave was blown up, Lord Mountbatten was blown up, there was the Enniskillen attack, we had kneecappings … But the British didn’t decide to say, ‘Well, on the Falls Road [the heart of Catholic Belfast] there undoubtedly may be some IRA members and Republican sympathizers, so therefore let’s drop a 2,000lb bomb on the Falls Road.’ You can’t do that.” He stressed, “Law must have some purpose, that’s what separates states that respect the law from criminal groups and terrorists. And that’s all I have been trying to do, apply law based on facts, and that’s what we must do whatever condemnation we get.” Khan is perplexed by the surprise at his announcement, given his consistent warnings since October 7. “I’ve been saying continuously since October 7, ‘Comply now, don’t complain later.’ I said it in Rafah when I wasn’t allowed in by Israel. I said it in Cairo, said it in public statements and said it directly to the Israelis and Palestinians. So I just don’t know why anyone is surprised.” As he spoke from his office in The Hague, Khan, 54, appeared visibly exhausted. “Every day one gets emails, other types of threats and pressure, direct and otherwise,” he admitted. However, having previously taken on Russian President Vladimir Putin for war crimes in Ukraine, Khan is undeterred by the challenges. Born in Edinburgh to a British mother and Pakistani father, Khan grew up in Yorkshire where his father worked as a consultant dermatologist. He attended Silcoates School, a private institution in West Yorkshire, and later studied law at King’s College London. His family belongs to the Ahmadiyya Muslim community, which faces persecution in Pakistan. “I’ve had family members killed, shot in Lahore when mosques were attacked,” he shared. In 1989, while Khan was studying law, his family experienced violence firsthand. “My father, my mother, my younger brother and my cousin, who is a doctor, were all attacked,” he recalled. “They were having an interfaith event at Batley town hall and mullahs came from Pakistan and attacked. They knocked my cousin unconscious, hit my father and mother, and when the police took them into the station next door, a mullah stood on an ambulance and said we will burn down the police station unless you release our people.” This personal history of persecution and violence informs Khan’s commitment to justice. He built his career at the Crown Prosecution Service and the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, gaining a reputation as a defense lawyer. He represented high-profile clients, including Liberian warlord Charles Taylor and Kenyan President William Ruto, before becoming chief prosecutor of the ICC in 2021. Upon taking office, Khan pledged to reform the ICC, focusing on crimes against children and sexual violence while expanding the court’s geographic reach. “We currently have active investigations in the Philippines, in Afghanistan, in Myanmar and Bangladesh and in Latin America and in Georgia, Ukraine and Palestine,” he noted. “We may not be perfect but we are sincere and guided by evidence not extraneous factors such as political convenience.” Khan’s focus on Gaza stems from the events following October 7, including both Hamas’s attack and Israel’s subsequent military response. He cited various indicators of humanitarian violations, such as the targeting of bakeries and water sources, and the killing of aid workers. “It’s the whole pattern that’s indicative. We’ve analyzed it objectively and rationally,” he asserted. Israel disputes these characterizations, claiming that Hamas has seized much of the aid intended for Gaza. However, Khan pointed to the reports of international relief agencies and medical professionals documenting severe humanitarian crises. “Look what all major relief agencies say, what we are seeing of emaciated children. Even if we don’t trust Palestinian doctors, we have American and British doctors speaking of conducting amputations without anesthetics, of babies dying in incubators because the power is turned off, of people dying because there is no insulin,” he said. “This is not how war is supposed to be waged. If this is what compliance with international humanitarian law looks like, then the Geneva Conventions serve no purpose.” To compile the charges, Khan’s team gathered diverse evidence, including witness testimonies, satellite imagery, and authenticated videos. He also enlisted a panel of respected international law experts to independently assess the evidence. Among them were Amal Clooney, Baroness Kennedy KC, Lord Justice Sir Adrian Fulford, Elizabeth Wilmshurst KC, Danny Friedman KC, and Theodor Meron. “These are great lawyers I respect hugely who have stood up for principle throughout their life,” he said. He emphasized the credibility and expertise of the panel, noting, “The fact they have been unanimous that evidence is there is very important.” Khan acknowledges that civilian casualties are an unfortunate reality in armed conflict, particularly in urban areas, but he maintains that deliberately targeting civilians is unacceptable. “It’s another thing for civilians to be deliberately targeted. You can’t have as a common plan collective punishment. It’s absolutely legitimate for Israel to have the objective to defeat Hamas and to get hostages out, I support that. But the way you engage must be compliant with law.” The debate over casualty figures in Gaza, which recently saw a shift from the UN's endorsement of over 35,000 dead to about 25,000 “identified” dead Palestinians plus an additional unverified 10,000 from Gazan media sources , was dismissed by Khan as a “red herring.” “Even with the lower figure, every one is a tragedy,” he said. Of course this figure is lower still when you take out the Hamas fighters that have also been killed as Gazan Health Authorities makes no distinction between civilian and combatant deaths and casualties. While criticism from some countries such as the UK and the US has been fierce, Khan maintains. “It’s a precarious moment internationally and if we don’t hold on to the law, we have nothing to cling onto,” Khan said. “Those profound words ‘Never Again’ are too often becoming ritual incantations. Credit: Sunday Times 2024-05-27 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Every year, as March heralds the beginning of Everest season, thousands of adventurers set their sights on conquering the world’s highest peak. Mount Everest, a name synonymous with extreme adventure, danger, and the ultimate mountaineering achievement, now offers a paradoxical blend of luxury amidst the perilous climb. For those willing to pay a hefty price, this challenging expedition can be transformed into a lavish experience, complete with high-end amenities that rival those of five-star hotels. Climbing Everest has never been cheap. The cost of an expedition can vary dramatically, ranging from $30,000 to over $500,000. This steep price tag includes several major expenses: permits, guide services, gear, and, for those who seek it, luxury accommodations and services. Alan Arnette, a mountaineering coach who successfully summited Everest in 2011, notes that some high-end packages include extravagant perks. “There was an [Everest guide] company last year that offered a masseur from Kathmandu, who stayed the whole season,” Arnette told The Daily Beast. “If you’re paying $100,000, you can expect cappuccinos and sushi up there. Even a three-star chef.” The luxury experience begins at the base camps, where the level of opulence can vary significantly based on how much a climber is willing to spend. Some of the most opulent adventurers arrive at Everest’s base camps with hired porters carrying their gear, before being shown to glamping-style tents equipped with amenities that rival any five-star hotel. Arnette explains, “There is a market for the high-end experience at Basecamp. It’s like an airplane. The experience is totally different the more you spend.” Among the most luxurious offerings is the $98,000 per person Mount Everest North Side Rapid Ascent Expedition by Alpenglow Expeditions. This 36-day trip on the north side of Everest in Tibet is designed for advanced explorers and includes small group sizes, an on-call doctor, nine bottles of oxygen, and a western-trained cook staff. At Alpenglow’s 26,000-foot base camp, travelers have access to dining tents, Wi-Fi, cell service, and a fully stocked kitchen. Furtenbach Adventures, another company catering to high-end clients, aims to provide a true “glamping” experience at a cost of $75,000. “Every climber has a two-room stand-up tent with a bed, desk, electricity, and Wi-Fi, and large lounge tents with a bar, movie screening, library, and hot showers,” founder Lukas Furtenbach told The Times of London in 2020. “Last year we even had a sauna and infrared cabin powered with a clean fuel cell,” he added. Wherever possible, clients can even fly in and out from base camp by helicopter, further enhancing the convenience and luxury of the experience. Preparation for such a luxurious climb often begins long before reaching the base camp. Some climbers invest in altitude tents, which simulate high-altitude conditions and allow climbers to begin the acclimatization process from the comfort of their own homes. This can significantly reduce the traditional eight-week trip to as little as two weeks. “There is essentially a plastic bubble that simulates high altitude at home so you can start the acclimatization process at home,” Arnette explained. “You sleep in them two months before you go on your trip.” Despite the luxurious options available, climbing Everest remains a dangerous endeavor. Over 300 people have died attempting the climb, with 17 fatalities recorded last year alone. This year, eight climbers have already lost their lives. The high cost of luxury expeditions often includes essential safety measures, which are crucial given the mountain’s deadly nature. Ryan Waters, a professional climber and owner of a guide company, warns that trips priced under $40,000 might compromise on safety. “While normal ranges for trips vary quite a lot,” he explained, “anything with less than a $40,000 price tag would raise red flags since it may be sacrificing some essential safety measures.” Waters’ company, Mountain Professionals, offers a sherpa-led general expedition for about $49,500, which increases to $65,000 with a western or American mountain guide leading the small team. For $100,000, climbers can enjoy a privately guided trip. Regardless of the tier, all Mountain Professional climbers enjoy amenities such as personal large box tents with carpet, a bed mattress, pillow, storage area, charging facilities, and Wi-Fi. The company’s base camp features a dining dome and a hangout dome equipped with heat, carpets, Wi-Fi, couches, and “lots of great food and coffee.” Waters emphasizes the importance of these amenities, saying, “Plus personal very large box tents for each climber while at base camp that have carpet, a bed mattress, pillow, storage area, charging, wifi, etc. In addition a propane heated shower, lots of toilet tents, and then staff domes and kitchen for our staff.” Mark Synnott, a professional climber who summited Everest in 2019, recalls enjoying the perks of high-end accommodations. “You hang out with the people that are staying at the highest-end spots,” he said. “They had this big dome tent and when you go inside, you immediately see an espresso machine. And then in their glamping tents, they have a foyer, a desk, and even a bedroom with a little bed.” Synnott would enjoy their “fizzy water” and coffee at the luxury digs before returning to his “regular tents.” Another significant advantage of more expensive guide packages is access to more high-flow rate oxygen during the actual summit. “A higher flow rate allows for an easier time climbing,” Synnott explained. This advantage can make a substantial difference in the climber’s experience and success rate. However, the luxury campsites and high-end amenities might not last forever. Nepalese officials are considering limiting the number of climbers and restricting luxury sites to preserve the mountain’s environment. The Telegraph reported in March that local officials aim to balance the increasing commercialization with environmental protection and the safety of climbers. Despite the opulent options, luxury climbing appeals to only a small portion of Everest mountaineers. Most climbers are not wealthy thrill-seekers but passionate adventurers who save for years to afford the trip. Alan Arnette estimates, “I would say you get about 10 percent of people at Everest that are just rich and doing it for bragging rights, about another 10 percent that don’t know what they are doing, and everyone else there works hard and spends a long time saving the money and has experience climbing.” This diverse mix of climbers adds to the unique atmosphere at Everest, where individuals from all walks of life come together to pursue a common goal. In the end, climbing Everest remains a profound and transformative experience. The mountain's allure endures, drawing adventurers with its promise of challenge, beauty, and the ultimate test of endurance. Whether in luxury or simplicity, the journey to the top of the world is a testament to human determination and the desire to conquer one of nature's most formidable giants. As Arnette aptly puts it, “It’s certainly one of the most experienced Instagram photos, but also so in owning a horse or sailing around the world.” The experience of Everest, with its blend of danger, beauty, and now, luxury, continues to captivate and inspire adventurers from around the globe. Credit: The Daily Beast 2024-05-27 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

With a general election looming in less than six weeks, the Labour Party, led by Sir Keir Starmer, is under intense scrutiny. Despite his efforts to project a centrist image akin to Tony Blair's, questions about the true nature of Labour's policies and instincts remain pressing. Starmer has spent considerable effort distancing himself from the more radical elements of the party, emphasizing that he isn't "tribal" and trying to convince voters of his moderate stance. Yet, examining the evidence suggests a more complex and potentially concerning reality. Starmer's 2020 Labour leadership campaign video serves as Exhibit A. This footage resembles a trailer for a Ken Loach film, where Starmer and his supporters highlight his defense of environmental activists, support for asylum seekers, and advocacy for trade unions. He proudly mentions his opposition to the Iraq War, efforts to halt Brexit, and resistance to privatizing the NHS. Starmer promises to "stand up for the powerless against the powerful" with a "green new deal" and a "human rights-based foreign policy." In this campaign, Starmer invited Labour members to unite around a radical agenda, suggesting that the economic model needed a complete overhaul to replace the "failed free market one." He called for an end to national division, symbolically taking the knee during the Black Lives Matter protests five months later. Although he has since tempered some of these left-wing pledges, his declaration, "I'm a socialist," lingers, casting doubt on his shift towards moderation. Despite attempts to present a more centrist stance, some of Starmer's policies remain rooted in progressive ideals. For instance, Labour appears poised to introduce gender self-identification. While Wes Streeting, the shadow health secretary, may have reconsidered his "trans women are women" stance, Anneliese Dodds, aiming to become the secretary of state for women and equalities, proposes allowing a single doctor to authorize gender changes, a move reminiscent of Nicola Sturgeon's policies. Starmer's relationship with Rosie Duffield, one of the few Labour MPs critical of the party's stance on gender issues, further illustrates internal tensions. Duffield was notably absent from Starmer's campaign launch in Kent, despite being Labour's sole MP in the county until Natalie Elphicke's defection, highlighting the party's struggle with inclusive representation. David Lammy, the shadow foreign secretary, raises additional concerns. Lammy's implicit support for the International Criminal Court's application to arrest Israeli officials, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, aligns with pro-Hamas sentiments and the recognition of Palestinian statehood. This stance, combined with Lammy's historical association with Jeremy Corbyn and opposition to the renewal of the Trident nuclear fleet, questions his suitability for high office. Angela Rayner, Labour's deputy leader, is another figure stirring debate. Her support for a New Deal for Working People, driven by union pressures, threatens to strain small and medium-sized businesses still recovering from the pandemic and economic crises. Despite shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves's rhetoric about being pro-business, Labour's policies suggest otherwise. Labour's proposed VAT on private school fees could push thousands of students into the already burdened state sector, exacerbating class space shortages. The party's ambitious plan to decarbonize the grid by 2030, despite uncertainties about its financial implications, raises further concerns about practicality and economic impact. Labour's instincts in government remain uncertain. Will Starmer be able to resist the party's more radical elements, or will he cave to pressures from the Left? Recent policy reversals, like the softened stance on Israel, indicate potential vulnerability to internal factions and external influences. This isn't the moderate Blairism of 1997. Behind the facade of moderation lies the risk of Labour reverting to idealistic, unrealistic politics. The party's association with environmental extremists, trans activists, and pro-Hamas hate mobs, coupled with an apologetic stance on British history and an open-border policy, suggest a potential shift towards radicalism. A vote for Labour may thus represent more than just a change in leadership; it could signify an alignment with eco-zealots, trans extremists, and pro-Hamas activists. The electorate must carefully consider these implications as the election approaches. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-05-27 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe