Social Media

A groundbreaking experimental drug has been shown to extend the lifespan of mice by 25%, raising the possibility that similar treatments could benefit humans. The drug, an antibody known as anti-IL-11, was administered to mice in middle age and demonstrated significant health benefits, including a reduction in cancer-related deaths and fewer incidences of diseases linked to fibrosis, chronic inflammation, and poor metabolism—conditions often associated with aging. Professor Stuart Cook, a senior scientist on the study, shared his enthusiasm about the findings. "These findings are very exciting. While these findings are only in mice, it raises the tantalizing possibility that the drugs could have a similar effect in elderly humans. The treated mice had fewer cancers and were free from the usual signs of aging and frailty, but we also saw reduced muscle wasting and improvement in muscle strength. In other words, the old mice receiving anti-IL-11 were healthier." Visual evidence provided by the researchers highlighted the stark differences between untreated and treated mice. The untreated group displayed greying fur patches, hair loss, and weight gain, while those that received the antibody injections retained glossy coats and demonstrated greater activity levels. This study was conducted collaboratively by researchers from the Medical Research Council Laboratory of Medical Science (MRC LMS), Imperial College London, and Duke-NUS Medical School in Singapore. The mice received the antibody injection at 75 weeks old, roughly equivalent to a human age of 55 years. The treated mice went on to live an average of 155 weeks, which is 35 weeks longer than the untreated group, as reported in the journal Nature. Remarkably, the drug showed very few side effects. Professor Cook noted, "Previously proposed life-extending drugs and treatments have either had poor side-effect profiles, or don't work in both sexes, or could extend life, but not healthy life—however, this does not appear to be the case for IL-11." The antibody works by inhibiting the action of the IL-11 protein, which is believed to play a role in the aging of cells and body tissues in both mice and humans. Professor Cook elaborated, "The IL-11 gene activity increases in all tissues in the mouse with age. When it gets turned on it causes multimorbidity, which is diseases of aging and loss of function across the whole body, ranging from eyesight to hearing, from muscle to hair, and from the pump function of the heart to the kidneys." The scientific community has long sought ways to slow the aging process, aiming to help people remain healthier for longer periods. Aging is often accompanied by multiple diseases, significantly impacting quality of life and imposing substantial costs on healthcare systems like the NHS. Other approaches, such as the diabetes drug metformin and severe calorie restriction, have shown promise in early studies, but their long-term effectiveness and safety remain under investigation. However, the notion of 'treating' aging remains controversial among some scientists. Ilaria Bellantuono, professor of musculoskeletal aging at the University of Sheffield, expressed caution: "The problem with all these interventions is that we do not have evidence in patients. Although trials are underway in the USA, there are scientific hurdles to overcome to use these interventions in patients, such as understanding who is at risk of frailty and would benefit from the intervention. It is unthinkable to treat every 50-year-old for the rest of their life. Every drug has side effects and there is a cost associated with it." Despite the challenges, the potential implications of anti-IL-11 are profound. If similar effects can be replicated in humans, this drug could revolutionize the approach to aging and extend not just lifespan but healthspan—the period of life spent in good health. The ultimate goal is to improve the quality of life for the elderly, reducing the burden of age-related diseases and enhancing overall health and vitality. As research progresses, the scientific community remains hopeful that treatments like anti-IL-11 will pave the way for a healthier, longer life. Credit: Sky News 2024-07-19 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

A deflection post has been removed along with a repetaitive trolling post on beheaded babies. Read the OP before making comments @Neeranam next time it will be more than posts removed.

Off topic non news unapproved video removed.

President Joe Biden's COVID-19 diagnosis could spell serious trouble for his reelection campaign, with political consultant Jay Townsend suggesting it might be the "nail in the coffin." Biden tested positive for the virus on Wednesday, prompting him to cancel his appearance at a UnidosUS event in Las Vegas, Nevada, and begin self-isolating at his home in Delaware in accordance with CDC guidelines. This development comes at a crucial juncture in the presidential race, just days after an assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump and amidst mounting calls from within Biden's own party for him to step aside as the Democratic nominee. The timing couldn't be worse, as Trump has recently announced Senator JD Vance of Ohio as his running mate at the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Townsend told Newsweek that Biden's diagnosis "could be the nail in the coffin" for his campaign, particularly if his symptoms linger. "It costs him time," Townsend said. "Time he won't have to be the President. Time he won't have to be a candidate. Time is the one thing in a political campaign you can never get back." Jeffrey Kraus, a government and politics professor at Wagner College, concurred, noting that Biden's illness comes at a particularly inopportune moment. "At a time when he needs to be countering the message coming out of Milwaukee, he will be unable to," Kraus said. "It is also not helpful at a time when a growing number of leading Democrats are suggesting he should not run because of his performance in the first debate and some of the other episodes of his misspeaking that have recently come to light." The White House, in response to these developments, referred Newsweek to a previous statement from spokesperson Andrew Bates, in which Biden reaffirmed his commitment to remain in the race. "He is the nominee of the party," Biden said, "and he plans to win." This latest challenge adds to a series of difficulties Biden has faced in recent weeks. Following a lackluster performance in a CNN debate last month, Biden has been the subject of increasing scrutiny and criticism. His frequent misspeaking and apparent confusion during the debate have renewed questions about whether the 81-year-old is fit to serve a second term. If reelected, Biden would be the oldest president to be inaugurated in U.S. history. The pressure on Biden to reconsider his candidacy has been mounting, with Representative Adam Schiff of California becoming the most prominent Democrat to publicly call for Biden to step aside. Schiff, who is running for the US Senate, praised Biden's legacy but stressed the need for a change in leadership. "While the choice to withdraw from the campaign is President Biden’s alone, I believe it is time for him to pass the torch. And in doing so, secure his legacy of leadership by allowing us to defeat Donald Trump in the upcoming election," Schiff said. Despite the growing chorus of voices urging him to withdraw, Biden has remained steadfast in his determination to stay in the race. In a recent interview with BET, Biden indicated that the only factor that might cause him to reconsider his candidacy would be a "medical condition." "If I had some medical condition that emerged, if somebody, if doctors came to me and said, 'You got this problem, that problem,'" Biden told BET host Ed Gordon. The timing of these comments, just a day before his COVID diagnosis, has led to speculation about whether his illness might be the impetus for Biden to exit the race. Townsend suggested that Biden's diagnosis could provide an "excuse to drop out," potentially framing it as a necessary step for the good of the party and the nation. Credit: Newsweek 2024-07-18 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Rep. Adam Schiff has become the most prominent elected Democrat to publicly call on President Joe Biden to drop out of the race. Schiff, who is currently running for the US Senate in California, made this announcement following the failed assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump over the weekend. Schiff’s statement is significant not only because of his status but also due to his close relationship with former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. He is the first Democrat to suggest that Biden step aside since the incident involving Trump. In his statement, Schiff acknowledged that the decision to withdraw from the campaign is ultimately Biden’s to make, but he expressed his belief that it is time for Biden to pass the torch. “While the choice to withdraw from the campaign is President Biden’s alone, I believe it is time for him to pass the torch. And in doing so, secure his legacy of leadership by allowing us to defeat Donald Trump in the upcoming election,” Schiff said. He went on to praise Biden’s leadership but emphasized the critical juncture at which the nation finds itself. “A second Trump presidency will undermine the very foundation of our democracy, and I have serious concerns about whether the President can defeat Donald Trump in November,” Schiff added. Schiff has been a vocal critic of Trump, having served as an impeachment manager during one of Trump's impeachment trials. His call for Biden to step aside is notable as it departs from the cautious stance he had previously taken. Following Biden’s poor performance in a CNN debate last month, Schiff had only suggested that the president should carefully consider the future of his campaign. Now, Schiff is unequivocally urging Biden to withdraw. A Biden campaign official responded to Schiff’s statement by referring to a July 8 letter from Biden to congressional Democrats, which reiterated his intention to remain in the race. The official also highlighted Biden’s continued support from other Democratic lawmakers, including Congressional Hispanic Caucus Chair Nanette Barragan. The Democratic Party is currently facing significant internal debate about the best path forward. There are growing concerns that Biden may not be able to defeat Trump in the upcoming election and that his continued candidacy could negatively impact other Democratic candidates in down-ballot races. CNN reported that the Democratic National Committee is proceeding with its plan to virtually nominate Biden at the Democratic convention in Chicago next month. This decision has been controversial, with some elected officials within the party calling for a reconsideration of the strategy amid the ongoing debate about Biden’s candidacy. As the political landscape continues to evolve, Schiff’s call for Biden to step aside marks a pivotal moment in the Democratic Party’s approach to the 2024 election. The coming weeks will likely see further discussions and potential shifts in strategy as Democrats navigate the challenges posed by a possible Trump candidacy and the internal divisions within their own ranks. Credit: CNN 2024-07-18 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

The European Commission has been criticized for its lack of transparency regarding COVID-19 vaccine purchase agreements. On Wednesday, the EU general court ruled that the Commission did not provide the public with sufficient access to these agreements made with pharmaceutical companies during the pandemic. This decision comes at a critical juncture as European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen seeks reelection in a vote at the European Parliament. A group of EU lawmakers took legal action after the Commission refused to grant them complete access to the COVID-19 vaccine contracts. The pandemic shed light on the issue of transparency in negotiations for vaccines between the EU and large pharmaceutical companies. The European Commission was tasked with organizing the joint procurement of vaccines for the 27 member states and led the negotiations with manufacturers. This centralized approach enabled the EU to rapidly amass 2.7 billion euros ($2.95 billion) to order over a billion vaccine doses. In 2021, some members of the European Parliament requested full details of the vaccine agreements, but the Commission only provided partial access to certain contracts and documents, which were made available online in redacted form. The Commission also withheld information on the costs of the billions of doses, citing confidentiality clauses in the contracts. The court criticized the Commission's approach, stating that it "did not take sufficient account of all the relevant circumstances in order to weigh up correctly the interests at issue." This lack of transparency has been a recurring issue. Two years ago, the EU's ombudsman accused the Commission of "maladministration" in a separate case involving access to text messages between President von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla. These messages were related to the vaccine procurements for EU countries, a fact revealed by a New York Times story. Following the report, a journalist requested access to these messages and other related documents, but the Commission claimed no records of the text messages were kept. Commission officials argued that text messages are ephemeral and do not contain significant information warranting their inclusion in the document management system. Ombudsman Emily O’Reilly recommended that the Commission conduct a more thorough search for the relevant messages. However, the executive branch maintained its stance, further fueling concerns about its commitment to transparency. The ongoing scrutiny and legal challenges suggest that the European Commission may need to revise its policies and practices regarding access to information, especially in matters of significant public interest such as health and safety. The court's decision underscores the need for greater openness in how the European Commission conducts its negotiations and manages information. As the pandemic highlighted the crucial role of vaccines, ensuring transparency in the procurement process is vital for maintaining public trust and accountability. The Commission's reluctance to provide full access to the vaccine agreements has raised questions about its handling of public health issues and its commitment to transparency. The legal challenge by the EU lawmakers and the court's ruling reflect growing concerns about the need for greater openness and accountability in the Commission's operations. The European Commission's handling of the COVID-19 vaccine agreements has brought to light the importance of transparency in public health matters. As the EU continues to navigate the challenges of the pandemic, it is essential for the Commission to ensure that its actions are transparent and accountable to the public. The court's ruling serves as a reminder of the need for greater openness in the Commission's operations and the importance of maintaining public trust in its decisions. The European Commission must address these concerns and take steps to improve its transparency and accountability in order to effectively serve the public and protect public health. Credit: ABC News 2024-07-18 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Ohio Senator JD Vance, newly nominated as the Republican party’s vice-presidential candidate, has sharply criticized President Joe Biden’s handling of the Israel-Hamas conflict. Vance, known for his populist views and recent shift to a pro-Trump stance, accused Biden of prolonging the war and obstructing efforts to strengthen ties between Israel and Saudi Arabia. Speaking to Fox News, Vance argued that Israel should swiftly conclude its war in Gaza to enable a coalition of Israel and Sunni Arab states to counter Iran. He expressed concern that Biden’s policies are hampering Israel’s ability to defeat Hamas and are delaying the potential for peace in the region. "What Biden has done is the worst of all possible worlds," Vance said. "He has prolonged the war, Israel’s war to actually take out Hamas, but in the process, he’s made it harder for us to really move towards a sustainable peace." Vance outlined two main objectives: ending the war quickly and reinvigorating the peace process involving Israel and key Arab states. "Number one is, you want to get this war over and as quickly as possible, because the longer it goes on the harder [Israel’s] situation becomes. But second, after the war, you want to reinvigorate that peace process between Israel, Saudi Arabia, the Jordanians and so forth," he said. The senator emphasized the importance of the Abraham Accords, agreements brokered during Trump’s presidency that normalized relations between Israel and several Arab nations. Vance suggested that Biden’s lack of action has stalled progress made by these accords. "Maybe the most important diplomatic issue of the Trump administration was the Abraham Accords," Vance said. "The Abraham Accords showed real promise of uniting the Israelis with some of the Sunni Arab states. You’ve got to enable the Israelis and the Sunni Arab states to work together and actually provide a counterbalance to Iran." Vance criticized Biden for not utilizing the existing infrastructure to weaken Iran and support Israel. He contrasted this with Trump’s decisive actions, such as the assassination of Qassem Soleimani, commander of Iran’s elite Quds Force, which he claimed brought peace rather than escalating conflict. "Joe Biden’s done nothing. You have the infrastructure there, sitting there, to weaken Iran, to strengthen our ally Israel. Joe Biden’s done nothing with it, Donald Trump would reinvigorate it," Vance asserted. The vice-presidential candidate also took issue with Biden’s approach to energy policy, arguing that American energy independence could weaken adversaries like Iran and Russia. "We’re sitting on the Saudi Arabia of natural gas in Ohio and Pennsylvania. Joe Biden would rather buy this stuff from Iran than buy it from Pennsylvania workers," Vance claimed, although the US does not buy oil from Iran due to sanctions. Vance reiterated his stance against further US support for Ukraine in its conflict with Russia, aligning with Trump’s “America First” policy. He suggested that the US should focus on negotiating a resolution to the Ukraine conflict to better address the threat from China. "I think what President Trump has promised to do is to go in there, negotiate with the Russians and the Ukrainians, bring this thing to a rapid close so that America can focus on the real issue, which is China. That’s the biggest threat to our country and we’re completely distracted from it," Vance said. Despite his isolationist views on Ukraine, Vance underscored the strategic importance of the US-Israel alliance, particularly in defense. He highlighted Israel’s technological advancements and contributions to US missile defense systems as vital to American national security. "Israel is one of the most dynamic, certainly on a per capita basis, one of the most dynamic and technologically advanced countries in the world," Vance stated, noting the importance of maintaining missile-defense parity through cooperation with Israel. "That’s a very important national security objective of the United States of America, and that’s something we’re working with one of the most innovative economies in the world to accomplish," he concluded. Vance’s comments come as he and former President Trump prepare for the upcoming election, with Vance’s nomination seen as solidifying Trump’s influence over the Republican party. As the election approaches, Vance’s positions on foreign policy and energy independence are likely to play a significant role in shaping the party’s platform and appeal to voters. Credit: TOI 2024-07-18 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

As the prospect of a second Trump presidency looms, the United Kingdom requires a Foreign Secretary capable of uniting rather than dividing. Recent remarks by Senator JD Vance of Ohio, the Republican nominee for vice-president, have compounded the difficulties for David Lammy, the current Foreign Secretary. Vance's comments last week suggested that the first Islamist state to obtain nuclear weapons was not Iran or Pakistan, but the UK. While these remarks were intended to be humorous and elicited laughter from his audience, they underscore the pressing need for Britain to prepare for a possible Trump 2.0 administration. David Lammy's appointment to one of the four great offices of state was already controversial before the recent attempt on Donald Trump's life. Lammy's historic tweets, made while he was in opposition, have come under renewed scrutiny. These tweets raise serious questions about his judgment and his suitability for the role of Foreign Secretary, a position he has held for less than a fortnight. In 2019, Lammy mocked Trump for complaining about his treatment by political opponents, tweeting, “4 US presidents have been assassinated snowflake.” While Lammy might argue that he would not have made such a crass comment had he known Trump would become the target of a gunman, his remark highlights the importance of avoiding inflammatory statements, especially given America's history of presidential assassinations. Lammy's political career has been marked by shifts in allegiance and inconsistent positions. Under the last Labour government, he supported Tony Blair and Gordon Brown, including voting to renew Britain's independent nuclear deterrent. However, in opposition, he aligned with Jeremy Corbyn, despite Corbyn's known stance as a unilateralist and his critical views on the European Union. Despite Lammy's previous claims of being a staunch Remain supporter, he nominated Corbyn, the only anti-EU candidate, for Labour leader just before the EU membership referendum. In 2016, Lammy's Christian faith supposedly influenced his decision to oppose the renewal of Trident, despite his previous voting record. Later, with Corbyn suspended and Starmer leading Labour, Lammy once again supported retaining Trident. In 2017, he praised Corbyn’s speech at the Labour conference as “bloody brilliant” and predicted Corbyn’s ascent to Number 10. By 2021, Lammy had changed his tune, expressing regret for nominating Corbyn and denying he ever believed Corbyn would become prime minister. Lammy’s past remarks about Trump further underscore his questionable judgment. Describing Trump as a “neo-Nazi-sympathising sociopath” and a “tyrant in a toupée” may have won him praise from Labour activists but were not the words of a serious politician or a statesman, especially one destined for the role of Foreign Secretary. Lammy has claimed to count Senator Vance as a friend, praising Vance’s autobiographical work, “Hillbilly Elegy,” and drawing parallels with his own upbringing in London. However, any perceived friendship with Vance would likely take a back seat to Vance's loyalty to Trump. Should Trump and Vance triumph in the upcoming election, it would present significant challenges for NATO and Ukraine. The Foreign Office would need to deploy all its diplomatic skills to protect British interests in a new Trump era. Yet, Keir Starmer, aware of the possibility that Trump could become president again, appointed Lammy, who had previously labeled Trump a neo-Nazi. Judgment in leadership is crucial. Leaders must measure their words and criticism carefully, even at the risk of disappointing their supporters. Some responsibilities transcend personal media profiles. If the Foreign Secretary fails to grasp this, Britain could face severe repercussions. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-07-18 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

A federal grand jury in Brooklyn, New York, has indicted Michail Chkhikvishvili, a 21-year-old leader of the neo-Nazi extremist group "Maniacs Murder Cult," on charges related to a plan to poison Jewish children in New York City. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced the indictment on Tuesday, detailing four charges that include soliciting hate crimes and acts of mass violence. Chkhikvishvili, a native of the Republic of Georgia, is accused of plotting a mass casualty attack scheduled for New Year’s Eve. Prosecutors allege that Chkhikvishvili devised a plan in November 2023 to have an associate dress as Santa Claus and distribute poisoned candy to children at Jewish schools in Brooklyn. The DOJ emphasized that this plan was intended to create widespread fear and chaos. According to the DOJ, Chkhikvishvili provided specific instructions to an undercover law enforcement officer, whom he believed to be a recruit. These instructions included detailed manuals on creating lethal poisons and gases. Court documents reveal that Chkhikvishvili visited New York City at least twice in 2022, staying with his grandmother in Brooklyn. The arrest came after Chkhikvishvili allegedly attempted to enlist the undercover officer in carrying out violent crimes as part of a broader scheme to incite terror. This scheme included plans for bombings and arson. Chkhikvishvili, also known by aliases such as Mishka, Michael, Commander Butcher, and Butcher, is accused of leading the Maniacs Murder Cult, which is based in Eastern Europe. The group adheres to a neo-Nazi accelerationist ideology that promotes violence against racial minorities, the Jewish community, and other groups it deems "undesirables." The DOJ detailed that Chkhikvishvili began recruiting for his extremist cause in 2021, distributing a manifesto called the "Hater's Handbook." This document discusses the group’s principles and describes methods for committing mass terror attacks. Chkhikvishvili claims in the handbook that he has "murdered for the white race" and encourages others to engage in school shootings, suicide bombings, and other acts of violence. The manifesto specifically mentions using vehicles to target large gatherings and pedestrian-congested streets, urging attacks within the United States. If convicted, Chkhikvishvili faces severe penalties, including up to 20 years for solicitation of violent felonies, five years for conspiracy to solicit violent felonies, 20 years for distributing information on explosive devices, and five years for transmitting threatening communication. The DOJ's announcement underscores the ongoing threat posed by extremist groups and the importance of vigilance and law enforcement efforts to prevent acts of terrorism and hate crimes. Credit: Newsweek 2024-07-18 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In the remote Peruvian Amazon, the Mashco Piro, an uncontacted indigenous tribe, has been making more frequent appearances, driven out of their forest sanctuary by the encroaching presence of logging operations. This rare glimpse into the life of a reclusive tribe was brought to light by Survival International, an organization dedicated to the rights of indigenous peoples. The images, published on Tuesday, show dozens of Mashco Piro individuals on the banks of a river close to areas where logging companies have established their concessions. These unprecedented sightings have alarmed local indigenous rights groups, particularly FENAMAD, which noted that the Mashco Piro seem to be searching for food as they venture out of the rainforest. This increased activity suggests a response to the growing threat posed by logging companies. "These incredible images show that a large number of isolated Mashco Piro live alone a few kilometers from where the loggers are about to start their operations," said Caroline Pearce, director of Survival International. At the end of June, more than 50 Mashco Piro individuals were photographed near the Yine village of Monte Salvado. Another group of 17 appeared by the nearby village of Puerto Nuevo. Historically, the Mashco Piro have remained deeply isolated, seldom interacting with the Yine or any other communities. Their recent emergence from the dense forest underscores the pressing issue of habitat disruption caused by logging activities. Several logging companies hold timber concessions within the territory traditionally inhabited by the Mashco Piro. Among these companies is Canales Tahuamanu, which has constructed over 200 kilometers (124 miles) of roads to facilitate the extraction of timber. Despite the company’s certification by the Forest Stewardship Council, which authorizes them to extract cedar and mahogany from 53,000 hectares (131,000 acres) of forest in Madre de Dios, the impact on the indigenous population is profound and troubling. A representative from Canales Tahuamanu in Lima did not respond to requests for comment on the matter. The Peruvian government reported on June 28 that local residents had spotted Mashco Piro individuals along the Las Piedras river, approximately 150 kilometers (93 miles) from Puerto Maldonado, the capital of Madre de Dios. This is not an isolated incident; sightings have also been reported across the border in Brazil. Rosa Padilha, from the Brazilian Catholic bishops’ Indigenous Missionary Council in the state of Acre, explained, "They flee from loggers on the Peruvian side. At this time of the year, they appear on the beaches to take tracajá (Amazon turtle) eggs. That’s when we find their footprints on the sand. They leave behind a lot of turtle shells." Padilha further elaborated on the Mashco Piro’s plight, describing them as "a people with no peace, restless, because they are always on the run." The displacement and continuous movement of the Mashco Piro illustrate the severe disruption caused by logging activities, pushing these indigenous people into an ever-smaller area and forcing them to seek sustenance outside their traditional forest habitat. The situation of the Mashco Piro brings into sharp focus the broader issues faced by uncontacted tribes in the Amazon. The encroachment of modern industry into their territories not only threatens their immediate survival but also jeopardizes their cultural and social structures. As these tribes are forced out of their secluded environments, they become increasingly vulnerable to diseases, exploitation, and further displacement. This critical juncture calls for urgent action to protect the Mashco Piro and other uncontacted tribes from the encroachment of logging and other industrial activities. The Peruvian government, international organizations, and indigenous rights groups must work together to enforce stricter protections for these vulnerable populations. It is imperative to recognize the sovereignty of uncontacted tribes over their ancestral lands and to safeguard their right to live undisturbed by external forces. The recent sightings of the Mashco Piro serve as a stark reminder of the fragile balance between human activities and the natural world. The images released by Survival International not only highlight the immediate threat to the Mashco Piro but also underscore the urgent need for a comprehensive approach to conservation and indigenous rights. Without decisive action, the world risks losing not only a unique cultural heritage but also the biodiversity and ecological integrity of the Amazon rainforest. Credit: CNN News 2024-07-18 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In response to a new law signed by California Governor Gavin Newsom, Elon Musk announced he is relocating the headquarters of two of his tech companies, SpaceX and X (formerly Twitter), from California to Texas. The move comes after Newsom signed a groundbreaking measure that prohibits public schools from notifying parents when their children identify as transgender, making California the first U.S. state to enact such a law. The legislation aims to protect transgender students and teachers who support them from potential retaliation. Musk announced his decision on Tuesday, stating that the headquarters of SpaceX will move from Hawthorne, California, to Starbase, Texas, while the headquarters of X will relocate from San Francisco to Austin, Texas. In his post on X, Musk cited the new law and previous legislation as factors that have made California inhospitable for families and businesses, prompting his decision to move. "Because of this law and the many others that preceded it, attacking both families and companies, SpaceX will now move its HQ from Hawthorne, Calif., to Starbase, Texas," Musk wrote on X. He mentioned that he had warned Newsom a year ago that such laws would drive families and businesses out of California. Musk also highlighted safety concerns in San Francisco as another reason for relocating X's headquarters. He pointed out that getting in and out of the building in San Francisco often involves "dodging gangs of violent drug addicts," a situation he hopes to avoid in Austin. Additionally, Musk has changed his state of residence from California to Texas, partly motivated by Texas' lack of personal income tax compared to California's high state income tax rates. Musk's announcement also touches on his personal life, specifically his relationship with his estranged son, Xavier Alexander Musk, who transitioned to female and legally changed her name to Vivian Jenna Wilson in 2022. Musk has attributed his daughter's transition to "neo-Marxists" and described her as a "fervent Marxist" who refuses to have any contact with him. He revealed that he only learned about her transgender identity through someone else and has unsuccessfully attempted to reach out to her. Despite the move of SpaceX and X to Texas, Musk previously relocated the headquarters of electric vehicle manufacturer Tesla from Austin to Palo Alto, California, in 2021. He has not indicated any plans to move Tesla's headquarters back to Texas at this time. This significant move by Musk reflects his ongoing discontent with California's political and social environment, which he believes is becoming increasingly hostile to both individuals and businesses. His decision underscores the broader debate over state policies and their impact on business operations and personal choices. Credit: UPI 2024-07-18 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Attorneys for Hannah Gutierrez Reed, the armorer convicted of involuntary manslaughter in the 2021 fatal shooting on the set of the movie "Rust," have filed a motion for a new trial or for her case to be dismissed. This filing comes on the heels of the related case against actor Alec Baldwin being dismissed due to significant prosecutorial misconduct and discovery violations. The motion, filed on Tuesday in the Santa Fe First Judicial District Court, cites "egregious prosecutorial misconduct" and multiple allegations of "severe and ongoing discovery violations by the state." Gutierrez Reed's attorneys are demanding the court order her release from prison and remove Kari Morrissey as the special prosecutor for what they claim are misconduct and violations committed in their client's case. On Friday, the involuntary manslaughter charges against Baldwin, who authorities say held the prop gun that discharged and killed cinematographer Halyna Hutchins in October 2021, were dismissed. The judge overseeing Baldwin’s case ruled that prosecutors had failed to properly turn over evidence to the defense. This collapse of Baldwin's case has fueled speculation among legal experts that Gutierrez Reed's conviction could similarly be overturned. She is currently serving an 18-month sentence following her March conviction. In their motion, Gutierrez Reed's attorneys argue that her case should be dismissed or retried, partly based on the judge’s determination of withheld evidence in Baldwin’s case. They assert that Morrissey lied in court about the evidence during Baldwin's trial and claim there were other instances of suppressed evidence in the armorer’s case. CNN has sought comment from Morrissey but has yet to receive a response. The shooting occurred on October 21, 2021, when Baldwin was on set at a ranch outside Santa Fe practicing a “cross draw” with a prop gun. This maneuver involves pulling the gun from a holster on the opposite side of the body from the draw hand. The gun discharged a live round, killing Hutchins and injuring director Joel Souza. As the armorer, Gutierrez Reed was responsible for firearm safety and storage on the set. Prosecutors argued at her trial that she repeatedly violated safety protocols and acted without caution in performing her duties, ultimately leading to Hutchins’ death. Gutierrez Reed’s defense attorneys argued that she had been scapegoated for the safety failures of the film set management and other crew members. The evidence that led to the implosion of Baldwin’s trial surfaced last week when a crime scene technician testified that a man had delivered a box of ammunition to the Santa Fe County Sheriff’s Office in March, right after Gutierrez Reed’s conviction. The man, Troy Teske, a retired police officer and friend of the armorer’s father, told investigators he had obtained the ammunition from prop supplier Seth Kenney and believed it could be associated with the "Rust" incident. However, the technician testified that the items were cataloged separately from Baldwin’s case and were not included in the "Rust" case inventory or tested to see if they matched the lethal round. Baldwin’s attorneys, in a filing last week asking for the case to be dismissed, claimed this could indicate “an external source of the live ammunition (prop supplier Seth Kenney)” on set. The Baldwin team’s filing alleged that prosecutors did not disclose the evidence because it “would be favorable to Baldwin.” Baldwin was unaware of the risk that live ammunition had been brought to the "Rust" set, and for prosecutors to establish a link between Baldwin and the live ammunition source, they would have to show that Gutierrez Reed, the armorer, had brought the rounds to the set. "Evidence that the live rounds came from Kenney is therefore favorable to Baldwin, which is why the state buried it," the document states. During a chaotic, hourslong hearing on Friday, investigators testified that they and Morrissey determined the ammunition was not relevant to the "Rust" case and did not turn it over to the defense. Morrissey also testified, stating that investigators had determined the ammunition was not a match to those found on the "Rust" set and had no evidentiary value. The lead investigator, however, testified that the rounds looked “similar” to the dummy rounds on the film’s set. Judge Mary Marlowe Sommer ruled that prosecutors had not properly turned over evidence to the defense and dismissed Baldwin’s case with prejudice, meaning it cannot be brought again. In Tuesday’s filing, Gutierrez Reed’s attorneys said prosecutors—and even Gutierrez Reed’s defense team—were aware of the ammunition Teske had before he gave it to the sheriff’s office in March. Her attorneys wrote an email to Morrissey in January, stating it was “important to compare the powder of the Teske rounds to the powder in the live rounds found on the Rust set.” Morrissey responded that she did not plan to retrieve or test the rounds because she found them visually dissimilar and not relevant, according to Gutierrez Reed’s attorneys. However, during Baldwin’s trial on Friday, Morrissey claimed that Gutierrez Reed’s attorneys did not want the rounds that Teske had because they incriminated their client. "That is an absolute falsehood. ... Far from distancing (themselves) from the Teske rounds, defense counsel recognized their potential exculpatory value had the state tested them," the court filing states. Teske had turned the rounds over to the sheriff’s office in March, hoping that it would test the rounds “while Gutierrez Reed pursued her appeal,” the filing says. “Instead, the state placed them in a separate case file and attempted to hide them,” Gutierrez Reed’s attorneys wrote. The attorneys also claim that an interview with Kenney, the prop supplier, was suppressed. They would have used his statements in cross-examination in Gutierrez Reed’s trial had they known about them. In the interview, Kenney spoke about Gutierrez Reed’s experience and mentioned that he had not heard allegations that she was unsafe, among other things, the attorneys wrote. A report conducted by state firearms experts was likewise not made available to Gutierrez Reed’s attorneys. The state revealed it to Baldwin’s defense team only after Gutierrez Reed was convicted. The report said the gun used on the "Rust" set had “unexplained toolmarks on critical surfaces of the trigger and sear,” according to Tuesday’s filing. Gutierrez Reed’s attorneys previously made this argument in a separate court filing, which Reuters reported last month, asking that a court release her from prison. The firearms experts’ finding is evidence that the gun could have accidentally fired and could have led to her not being found guilty in the case, said her attorney Jason Bowles last month, according to Reuters. Her defense team "has also become aware of another possible 900 or so pages of material" related to the state’s witnesses that were disclosed to Baldwin’s attorneys shortly before his trial but not to Gutierrez Reed’s attorneys. "Her lawyers were still reviewing these at the time of the filing of this motion," the filing reads. The state violated Gutierrez Reed’s due process rights by failing to disclose evidence, her attorneys argue in Tuesday’s filing. "This court stated on July 12 that the integrity of the judicial system demanded that the court dismiss Mr. Baldwin’s case with prejudice," the filing said. "How can it be any different with Ms. Gutierrez Reed’s case, with this proven litany of serious discovery abuses?" "The intentional withholding of crucial evidence ... by the state has compromised the integrity of the entire judicial process," the filing continued. Gutierrez Reed previously filed an appeal of her conviction in May, and this latest motion represents another critical step in her legal battle. As the legal proceedings continue to unfold, the court's decision on this motion could significantly impact the future of Gutierrez Reed’s case and the broader implications for justice and accountability in the tragic incident on the set of "Rust." Credit: CNN 2024-07-18 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Joe Rogan has recently addressed the growing speculation that Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has constructed a nuclear bunker to protect himself in the event of a nuclear war. This theory, fueled by international tensions and unverified reports over the past few decades, suggests that public figures have built secret bunkers for safety against potential nuclear strikes. Rogan discussed this topic on his podcast with investigative journalist Annie Jacobsen, who has written extensively on the subject in her latest book, "Nuclear War: A Scenario." During the podcast, Jacobsen shared alarming insights from her book, which includes interviews with various defense officials. According to her research, the outcome of a nuclear war would be catastrophic, with an estimated 5 billion people dead within 72 minutes. She emphasized that once a nuclear war begins, it rapidly escalates into a nuclear holocaust, leaving no time for anyone to retreat to a bunker. Jacobsen said, "If nuclear war begins, it doesn't end until there is a nuclear holocaust. And it happens so fast—there is no quickly going to your secret bunker you have." Rogan expressed his skepticism about the effectiveness of such bunkers, particularly the one allegedly built by Zuckerberg. He dismissed the idea, saying, "Yeah, all that's nonsense. These people think, like, Zuckerberg is building a bunker in Hawaii [and] he's going to survive. He's building a hurricane shelter that might not work." Jacobsen agreed, noting that unless Zuckerberg was in the bunker at the exact moment of the nuclear attack, it wouldn't serve its purpose. "And also, unless he happened to be there in the exact moment when all of this went down..." she added. Rogan highlighted the impracticality and fear associated with these doomsday preparations, noting that one would have to know in advance about the imminent launch of a nuclear strike to make use of such a bunker. He described the whole scenario as terrifying. In December, Wired published a report claiming that Zuckerberg and his wife, Priscilla Chan, were planning to build a 5,000-square-foot underground shelter on their Hawaii ranch. This shelter would be equipped with its own energy and food supplies and be part of their 1,400-acre Ko'olau Ranch on the island of Kauai. The planning documents reviewed by Wired indicated that the ranch would also feature more than a dozen buildings, including at least 30 bedrooms and 30 bathrooms, two mansions, and 11 tree houses. However, the intended use of the bunker was not explicitly stated at the time of the investigative article's publication. Brandi Hoffine Barr, a spokesperson for Zuckerberg and Chan, clarified that Kauai County encourages homeowners to build shelters, offering tax breaks for constructing hurricane-resistant safe rooms. She stated, "Mark and Priscilla value the time their family spends at Ko'olau Ranch and in the local community, and are committed to preserving the ranch's natural beauty." According to Hoffine Barr, there were initial plans to build 80 luxury homes on the property before the couple purchased it, but they are now developing on less than one percent of that land, dedicating the remainder to farming, ranching, conservation, and wildlife preservation. This debate over nuclear bunkers comes amidst data from the Federation of American Scientists, which shows that Russia currently has the most nuclear warheads globally, with 5,977, while the U.S. possesses 5,428. The Federation also reports that of the world's 12,700 nuclear warheads, more than 9,400 are in military stockpiles for use by missiles, aircraft, ships, and submarines. As these statistics highlight the ongoing nuclear threat, the conversation about the practicality and morality of doomsday bunkers for the elite remains a contentious topic. Credit: Newsweek 2024-07-18 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

On October 7, 2023, Hamas-led armed groups executed a series of severe crimes against humanity and war crimes during an assault on southern Israel. This coordinated attack included summary killings, hostage-taking, and other grave offenses, sparking urgent calls for the immediate release of all civilian hostages and the prosecution of those responsible. A detailed 236-page report by Human Rights Watch, titled "'I Can't Erase All the Blood from My Mind': Palestinian Armed Groups' October 7 Assault on Israel," documents numerous violations of international humanitarian law. These crimes, committed at nearly all the civilian attack sites, include murder, hostage-taking, and other war crimes and crimes against humanity. The report reveals that the attacks were meticulously planned to kill civilians and take as many hostages as possible, prompting a global call to end all abuses against civilians in both Israel and Palestine. Between October 2023 and June 2024, Human Rights Watch interviewed 144 people, including 94 Israeli and other nationals who witnessed the October 7 assault, victims’ family members, first responders, and medical experts. They also verified and analyzed over 280 photographs and videos taken during the assault. On the morning of October 7, Hamas-led groups carried out multiple coordinated attacks on civilian residential communities, social events, and Israeli military bases in southern Israel near the Gaza Strip. They attacked at least 19 kibbutzim and 5 moshavim (cooperative communities), the cities of Sderot and Ofakim, two music festivals, and a beach party. The fighting lasted for much of the day and, in some cases, extended longer. Across these attack sites, Palestinian fighters fired directly at civilians at close range, hurled grenades, shot into shelters, and used rocket-propelled grenades to destroy homes. They set houses on fire, resulting in deaths by burning and suffocation, and forced people out, who were then shot or captured. They took dozens of hostages and summarily killed others. Nirit Hunwald, a nurse from Kibbutz Be’eri where 97 civilians were killed, described dragging a rapid response team member who had been shot into the kibbutz’s dental clinic to treat his wounds, stating, “There was a blood trail. I cannot erase it from my mind, all the blood.” Agence France-Presse reported that 815 of the 1,195 people killed on October 7 were civilians. The armed groups took 251 civilians and Israeli security force personnel hostage and transported them to Gaza. As of July 1, 116 remained in Gaza, including the bodies of at least 42 who had been killed. The bodies of another 35 who were killed were returned to Israel. The Qassam Brigades led the assault, and Human Rights Watch confirmed the participation of four other Palestinian armed groups. The fighters' affiliations were identified by headbands and claims of responsibility posted on their Telegram channels. These armed groups committed numerous violations of the laws of war, amounting to war crimes, including targeting civilians and civilian objects, willful killing of people in custody, cruel and inhumane treatment, crimes involving sexual and gender-based violence, hostage-taking, mutilation and despoiling bodies, using human shields, and looting. The widespread attack was directed against a civilian population, with the killing of civilians and taking of hostages being central aims of the planned assault. Human Rights Watch concluded that these acts constituted crimes against humanity. Further investigation is needed into other potential crimes against humanity, including persecution based on racial, national, ethnic, or religious grounds, rape or other sexual violence, and extermination if there was a mass killing calculated to destroy part of a population. Hamas authorities, in response to questions from Human Rights Watch, claimed their forces were instructed not to target civilians and to abide by international human rights and humanitarian law. However, Human Rights Watch investigations found evidence contradicting these claims. Survivors' accounts, along with verified photographs and videos, showed that Palestinian fighters intentionally sought out and killed civilians from the onset of the assault, indicating that these actions were planned and highly coordinated. Credit: HRW 2024-07-18 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

President Joe Biden is reportedly considering endorsing significant reforms to the US Supreme Court, potentially including the end of lifetime appointments for justices. This shift in stance comes after a series of controversial decisions by the court, such as the removal of the federal right to abortion and a ruling that granted Donald Trump immunity from prosecution for his official acts as president. According to US media, Biden is exploring the establishment of term limits for justices, currently lifetime appointments, and bolstering the court's ethics code. Implementing these changes would be a major reversal for Biden, who has long resisted calls from his party to reform the court. The push for change intensified after his predecessor, Trump, appointed three conservative justices, creating a 6-3 conservative majority. This majority has issued several high-profile rulings that have significantly affected American law, including decisions on abortion rights, gun laws, the environment, and Trump's criminal trials. CBS News, the BBC's partner in the US, reported that Biden discussed these potential reforms with experts and indicated that announcements would be made soon. A source familiar with the matter revealed that Biden informed Democrats in the Congressional Progressive Caucus during a weekend call. Despite being asked about the proposed changes, White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre declined to provide further details or a timeline for an official announcement. In a post on Truth Social, Trump criticized the potential reforms, calling them an "illegal and unconstitutional attack on our SACRED... Supreme Court." His response highlights the contentious nature of the proposed changes and the significant opposition they are likely to face. Biden's contemplation of these reforms also comes amid questions about the ethics of some justices on the high court. Justice Clarence Thomas, for example, has faced scrutiny for accepting luxury trips from a billionaire Republican donor. Additionally, there have been questions about the involvement of Thomas's wife in efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election, which saw Trump lose to Biden. Early in his presidency, Biden created a commission to issue recommendations on Supreme Court reforms. However, the advice provided by this commission was never acted upon. The political landscape remains challenging, with Democrats facing a divided Senate and a Republican-controlled House of Representatives, making any significant judicial reforms difficult to pass. The Supreme Court's recent term has underscored the sharp political shift with the conservative majority. Among the notable decisions was the rejection of Biden's student loan forgiveness plan, which would have eliminated billions in debt for Americans. On its last day of opinions, the court ruled that Trump and other presidents have broad, but not absolute, immunity from criminal prosecution for their actions in office. Following this ruling, one of the four criminal cases against Trump was dismissed, and sentencing in another case was delayed. In addition to considering Supreme Court reforms, Biden is reportedly examining the possibility of backing a constitutional amendment that would eliminate the broad immunity cited by the court. If announced, these changes could provide Biden with a new campaign issue as the November election approaches. The president frequently references the Supreme Court and its rulings on the campaign trail. During a recent interview with BET, Biden mentioned the court's 2022 decision that overturned Roe v. Wade, eliminating the federal right to an abortion. He warned of the potential consequences if Trump were to win another term and appoint additional justices, stating, "Just imagine if he has two more appointments." Credit: BBC 2024-07-18 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

On July 16, Kaspersky Lab, a prominent Moscow-based software company, announced its decision to close its U.S. offices and lay off its American workforce. This move comes in response to a recent ban imposed by the U.S. Commerce Department, which cited national security concerns as the reason for the prohibition. For nearly two decades, Kaspersky Lab had established itself as a leading antivirus software provider in the United States, with its products widely used by government agencies and private entities alike. The company's seminars and training sessions were particularly popular in the Washington, D.C., area, highlighting its significant presence and influence in the cybersecurity sector. However, the situation took a dramatic turn in June when the U.S. Commerce Department, led by Secretary Gina Raimondo, announced a ban on Kaspersky Lab and its subsidiaries. The department's statement emphasized that Kaspersky's products posed "an undue or unacceptable national security risk" to the United States. This ban effectively barred the company from selling its products or providing updates within the country. Simultaneously, the U.S. Treasury Department sanctioned Kaspersky and several members of its leadership team, reinforcing the narrative that the company represented a threat to national security. The sanctions, combined with the Commerce Department's ban, left Kaspersky with no viable business opportunities in the U.S. market. Kaspersky Lab expressed its regret over the decision, stating, "The company has carefully examined and evaluated the impact of the U.S. legal requirements and made this sad and difficult decision as business opportunities in the country are no longer viable." This statement, reported by CNN, reflects the company's acknowledgment of the insurmountable challenges posed by the new regulatory landscape. Founded in Moscow in 1997, Kaspersky Lab quickly rose to prominence in the global cybersecurity industry. It became one of the top antivirus software companies, competing with American giants such as McAfee and Symantec. Despite facing persistent allegations of aiding the Russian government in cyber activities, Kaspersky Lab consistently denied these accusations, maintaining its commitment to delivering high-quality cybersecurity solutions. The ban, which takes effect on July 20, will halt the sale and distribution of Kaspersky's products in the U.S. Additionally, American customers will no longer receive updates to their existing Kaspersky software after September 29. This disruption poses significant challenges for users who have relied on Kaspersky's antivirus protection and will need to seek alternative solutions to safeguard their systems. Kaspersky's departure from the U.S. market marks a significant shift in the cybersecurity landscape. As one of the industry's major players, its exit will undoubtedly create a void, potentially benefiting its competitors. However, the broader implications of this move extend beyond commercial interests, reflecting ongoing geopolitical tensions and the increasing focus on cybersecurity as a critical component of national security. Credit: UPI 2024-07-18 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

As Covid-19 cases surge once again in the United States, concerns about the virus's impact are resurfacing. According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), emergency department visits associated with Covid-19 have been increasing steadily, with a 23.5% rise reported for the week ending July 6 compared to the previous week. Additionally, Covid-19 viral activity in wastewater remains high nationally. These trends are echoed in personal experiences and public events, as evidenced by infections among friends and public figures, including Doug Emhoff, and the impact on events like the Tour de France. This summer wave prompts a re-evaluation of Covid-19's spread and raises important questions: Why is this wave occurring now? Should individuals be concerned about getting infected again? How can one minimize the risk while maintaining a normal lifestyle, especially when traveling? Is it advisable to get vaccinated now or wait for the updated vaccine? Do home tests still provide reliable results? What are the current recommendations if one contracts Covid-19? To address these questions, CNN consulted with Dr. Leana Wen, an emergency physician and clinical associate professor at George Washington University, and a former health commissioner of Baltimore. Dr. Wen acknowledges the current summer wave of Covid-19 infections, noting that such patterns have been observed throughout the pandemic. Multiple waves each year, including peaks in the summer, are partly attributed to increased travel and indoor gatherings due to hot weather. The level of concern should be tailored to individual medical circumstances. Those at higher risk, such as older adults, the immunocompromised, and individuals with multiple underlying health conditions, should remain vigilant. Ensuring up-to-date vaccinations, having a plan for antiviral treatments, and considering additional precautions like masking in crowded indoor spaces and opting for outdoor gatherings are recommended steps for these vulnerable groups. For those resuming pre-pandemic activities, Dr. Wen suggests a balanced approach. While many people are returning to socializing, attending events, and other activities, reducing the risk of infection, especially before visiting vulnerable individuals, is crucial. Measures such as avoiding indoor gatherings, masking in public transit, and taking rapid tests before visits can significantly reduce the risk of transmitting the virus. Regarding the efficacy of home tests, Dr. Wen confirms that while rapid antigen tests are less accurate than PCR tests, they remain a convenient tool for screening Covid-19. Individuals with symptoms should take rapid tests, and if the initial result is negative, retest the following day. It is important to remember that symptoms could be due to other respiratory viruses, so staying away from vulnerable individuals is advisable even if the Covid-19 test is negative. When traveling, Dr. Wen advises wearing an N95 or equivalent mask in crowded, poorly ventilated spaces, such as during boarding planes or on crowded trains. Opting for outdoor dining when possible, carrying rapid tests, and having a plan for accessing antiviral treatments if needed are also recommended. Travel insurance can provide additional security, covering medical care and costs if plans change due to illness. As for vaccinations, a new Covid-19 vaccine formulation is expected to be available in the fall, possibly as early as August. The CDC recommends that everyone aged six months and older receive this updated vaccine, which is anticipated to be more effective against current variants. Given the proximity to the release of the new vaccine, Dr. Wen suggests waiting for the updated formulation. The primary goal of vaccination is to reduce severe illness, hospitalization, and death rather than merely preventing infection, as the latter benefit diminishes quickly over time. Those requiring extra protection should continue to take additional precautions. If one contracts Covid-19, the CDC's updated guidance recommends staying home until fever-free for at least 24 hours and symptoms are improving, with additional precautions like masking and limiting contact with others for five more days. Dr. Wen emphasizes that individuals should consider the medical circumstances of their household members. If living with someone highly vulnerable, it is prudent to avoid close contact until testing negative for Covid-19, including avoiding indoor dining and shared spaces. Ultimately, while many people can continue their daily activities during this summer wave, those at higher risk should adopt additional precautions. It is essential for everyone to contribute to protecting the most vulnerable by taking reasonable measures to reduce the spread of Covid-19. Credit: CNN News 2024-07-18 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Democratic Senator Bob Menendez of New Jersey has been found guilty on all counts in a high-profile corruption trial that revealed his acceptance of bribes, including cash and gold bars, to benefit the governments of Egypt and Qatar. The verdict, which comes as Menendez campaigns for re-election to his New Jersey Senate seat as an independent, has sparked widespread calls for his resignation from fellow Democrats. The U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Damian Williams, whose office prosecuted the case, hailed the verdict. "Menendez’s years of selling his office to the highest bidder have finally come to an end," Williams stated. During the reading of the verdict, Menendez appeared emotionless, with his hands crossed and his chin resting on them, though he later shook his head in disagreement as the jurors were polled. Some family members broke down in tears. Following the verdict, Menendez expressed his disappointment to reporters outside the courthouse, saying he was "deeply, deeply disappointed by the jury’s decision" and predicted that "we will be successful upon appeal." He maintained his innocence, asserting, "I have never violated my public oath." However, he did not answer questions about whether he would resign. Menendez faced 16 charges, including bribery, extortion, acting as a foreign agent, obstruction of justice, and several counts of conspiracy. His wife, Nadine Menendez, also charged, had her trial delayed indefinitely due to surgery following a breast cancer diagnosis. The jury deliberated for approximately 12½ hours over three days before delivering their verdicts. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., quickly called for Menendez to step down, stating, "In light of this guilty verdict, Senator Menendez must now do what is right for his constituents, the Senate, and our country, and resign." Schumer had previously expressed disappointment in Menendez, noting that the senator had not lived up to the high standards expected of a senator, but had refrained from explicitly calling for his resignation until the verdict was delivered. The prosecution argued that three businessmen paid bribes to Menendez and his wife in exchange for the senator taking actions to benefit them and the governments of Qatar and Egypt. These bribes included gold bars, a Mercedes-Benz given to Nadine Menendez, and more than $480,000 in cash, which the FBI found hidden in closets, jackets bearing Menendez’s name, and other clothing during a search of his New Jersey home in 2022. Two of the businessmen, Wael Hana and Fred Daibes, were tried alongside Menendez and were convicted on all counts. The third businessman, Jose Uribe, pleaded guilty and testified during the nine-week trial. Menendez did not testify in his defense. His legal team argued that he was acting on behalf of his constituents as any senator should and claimed that the government had not proven that the cash or gold bars were given as bribes. Menendez's sister, Caridad Gonzalez, testified that their Cuban immigrant parents had discouraged them from trusting banks, which is why it was not surprising to her when Menendez asked her to retrieve $500 from a shoe box in a closet in the mid-1980s. "It was normal. It’s a Cuban thing," she explained. Prosecutors pointed out that some of the cash envelopes in the Menendezes' home had Daibes’ fingerprints, while others bore the fingerprints of associates of Hana. Prosecutor Paul Monteleone emphasized in his closing statement that Menendez was "desperately trying to pass the buck" for the large sums of money found in his home, declaring, "The thousands and thousands of bucks stop here." The guilty verdict lands just months before Menendez’s Senate seat comes up for election in New Jersey. Menendez had already decided not to seek the Democratic nomination due to a decline in his popularity, instead filing to run as an independent. This move threatens to complicate the dynamics of a race that would ordinarily favor Democrats in the liberal state. The Democratic nominee for the seat is Rep. Andy Kim, while the Republican nominee is Curtis Bashaw. Menendez now faces a crucial decision regarding his candidacy. In March, he indicated in a video statement that his candidacy could hinge on the outcome of his trial, expressing hope that an exoneration would allow him to pursue his candidacy as an independent Democrat in the general election. "I am hopeful that my exoneration will take place this summer and allow me to pursue my candidacy as an independent Democrat in the general election," he said at the time. Rep. Andy Kim reacted to the verdict by reiterating his call for Menendez to step down, stating, "It is a sad and somber day for New Jersey and our country. I called on Senator Menendez to step down when these charges were first made public, and now that he has been found guilty, I believe the only course of action for him is to resign his seat immediately. The people of New Jersey deserve better." This marks the second corruption trial in Menendez’s 18-year Senate career. The previous trial in 2018 resulted in a mistrial due to a hung jury, and the Justice Department subsequently dropped the charges. Menendez had also denied wrongdoing in that case. Before his tenure in the Senate, Menendez served for 13 years in the House and was elected to the Senate in 2006, eventually rising to become the chairman of the powerful Senate Foreign Relations Committee. His political career dates back nearly four decades to the mid-1980s when he became mayor of Union City. The guilty verdict could significantly impact whether Menendez serves out his current term. Senator John Fetterman, D-Pa., has led the charge to push Menendez out, mocking him as too corrupt to serve. A majority of Senate Democrats, including Senator Cory Booker, D-N.J., and most of New Jersey’s Democratic House delegation, had called for Menendez to resign even before the trial concluded. Although Menendez stepped aside as chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee after the charges were brought, he has remained a voting member of both the committee and the Senate. There is no provision barring a senator who has been convicted of a felony from serving out his term. If Menendez does not resign, the Senate could initiate proceedings to expel him, starting with an Ethics Committee investigation. The committee has stated that it will complete its investigation "promptly" and consider the "full range of disciplinary actions" available. If the panel recommends his expulsion, it would require a two-thirds vote of the entire Senate—67 votes—to remove him from office. Historically, the Senate has expelled only 15 members since 1789, 14 of whom were ousted for their roles in the Confederacy. The last time a senator was expelled was in 1862. Since then, six senators have been convicted of crimes; three resigned, two served out their terms, and one died before the Senate could act. Thirty-one Democratic senators had already called for Menendez to resign before his conviction. Credit: NBC News 2024-07-17 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

US authorities recently obtained intelligence from a human source indicating a plot by Iran to assassinate Donald Trump. This led the Secret Service to ramp up security around the former president, according to multiple sources briefed on the matter. Despite this threat, there is no known connection between this plot and Thomas Matthew Crooks, the individual who attempted to assassinate Trump at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, on Saturday. The intelligence threat from a hostile foreign agency, coupled with the enhanced security measures for Trump, raises questions about the security lapses at the Pennsylvania rally. A 20-year-old man managed to access a nearby rooftop and fire shots that injured the former president. A US national security official confirmed that both the Secret Service and the Trump campaign were informed of the threat before the rally. "Secret Service learned of the increased threat from this threat stream," the official told CNN. "NSC directly contacted USSS at a senior level to ensure they continued to track the latest reporting. USSS shared this information with the detail lead, and the Trump campaign was made aware of an evolving threat. In response to the increased threat, Secret Service surged resources and assets for the protection of former President Trump. All of this was in advance of Saturday." The Trump campaign did not confirm whether it was aware of the Iranian threat. "We do not comment on President Trump’s security detail. All questions should be directed to The United States Secret Service," the campaign stated. Secret Service officials have repeatedly warned the Trump campaign against holding outdoor rallies due to the greater risks compared to controlled-access events. These warnings have been general in nature but are part of the agency's continuous effort to adjust resources in response to potential threats. "The Secret Service and other agencies are constantly receiving new potential threat information and taking action to adjust resources, as needed," Anthony Guglielmi, an agency spokesman, said. "We cannot comment on any specific threat stream, other than to say that the Secret Service takes threats seriously and responds accordingly." The FBI, which is investigating Saturday’s shooting, declined to comment on the matter. NSC spokesperson Adrienne Watson stated that there is no known link between shooter Thomas Matthew Crooks and any other individuals at this time. "The investigation of Saturday’s attempted assassination of former President Trump is active and ongoing. At this time, law enforcement has reported that their investigation has not identified ties between the shooter and any accomplice or co-conspirator, foreign or domestic," Watson said. The Permanent Mission of the Islamic Republic of Iran to the United Nations denied any plot to assassinate Trump. "These accusations are unsubstantiated and malicious. From the perspective of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Trump is a criminal who must be prosecuted and punished in a court of law for ordering the assassination of General Soleimani. Iran has chosen the legal path to bring him to justice," a spokesperson for the mission told CNN. Trump and the Republican vice presidential nominee, Sen. JD Vance of Ohio, are set to hold their first official campaign rally together on Saturday at an indoor arena in Grand Rapids, Michigan. Iran has repeatedly vowed revenge for the US military’s killing of Qasem Soleimani, the commander of the Iranian military’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, in January 2020. Former senior Trump administration officials involved in national security have had tight security since leaving the government. In August 2022, the Justice Department charged a member of the IRGC with attempting to orchestrate the assassination of John Bolton, Trump's former national security adviser. The plot against Bolton was believed to be retaliation for Soleimani's assassination. Former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo was also targeted by an Iranian assassination plot, according to sources. Trump’s former national security adviser, Robert O’Brien, who had a US government security detail due to threats from Iran, is now paying for his own private security after his detail was dropped last summer. Bolton, however, still has his Secret Service detail. For months, law enforcement officials have been concerned about the persistent threat from Iran against former Trump officials and Trump himself. The recent intelligence indicated a significant increase in this threat, coinciding with a surge in online messaging from Iranian accounts and state-backed media mentioning Trump, raising security concerns among US officials. Credit: CNN 2024-07-17 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

CIA Director Bill Burns disclosed on Saturday that Yahya Sinwar, the leader of Hamas in Gaza, is under mounting pressure from his own military commanders to agree to a ceasefire and end the ongoing war with Israel. Burns made these comments during a closed-door conference, as revealed by an attendee granted anonymity to discuss the off-the-record event. Sinwar, identified as the key orchestrator of the October 7 massacre in Israel, is reportedly unconcerned with his own mortality but faces increasing scrutiny over the significant suffering in Gaza. According to Burns, US intelligence believes Sinwar is hiding in the tunnels beneath Khan Younis, his birthplace in Gaza, and is the pivotal figure in deciding whether Hamas will accept a ceasefire deal. Burns emphasized the urgency for both the Israeli government and Hamas to seize this critical moment to reach a ceasefire, especially after more than nine months of conflict. He noted that internal pressure on Sinwar has notably intensified over the past two weeks, with senior commanders within Hamas growing weary of the prolonged fighting. The CIA director made these remarks at the annual Allen & Company summer retreat in Sun Valley, Idaho, an exclusive event known for its high-profile guest list, including tech moguls, media titans, and senior government officials. The CIA declined to comment on Burns' statements. The growing pressure on Sinwar coincides with a framework deal between Hamas and Israel that President Joe Biden outlined in late May. This framework serves as the foundation for a potential agreement to end the fighting. Burns, who recently returned from a trip to the Middle East to further negotiations, has been actively engaged in discussions with mediators from Qatar and Egypt, as well as Israel's head of foreign intelligence. During his speech, Burns highlighted a "fragile possibility" for a ceasefire, noting that the chances of an agreement are higher than they have been in months. However, he acknowledged that the final stages of negotiations are always challenging. The previous round of talks collapsed in May, despite a similar flurry of meetings and diplomatic efforts. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is also under significant domestic pressure to secure a deal that would bring home the remaining hostages held in Gaza. Thousands of Israeli protesters have been regularly demonstrating in Tel Aviv, demanding the government prioritize the return of hostages over continued military operations. "There are still gaps to close, but we’re making progress, the trend is positive," Biden said on Thursday. "I’m determined to get this deal done and bring an end to this war, which should end now." The intricate details of the potential ceasefire agreement and the difficulties in communicating with Sinwar, who remains in hiding, have slowed progress. Of the three most senior Hamas leaders in Gaza, Israel has reportedly found and killed just one: Marwan Issa, the second in command of the military wing. Mohammed Deif, Hamas' military chief, was targeted by Israel in a recent bombing that killed nearly 100 Palestinians, but it remains unclear whether Deif was among the casualties although its highly likely he was. US officials believe Sinwar no longer desires to rule Gaza, and both Israel and Hamas have reportedly agreed to an "interim governance" plan that excludes either party from controlling Gaza in the second phase of a ceasefire. Credit: CNN 2024-07-17 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Donald Trump has announced that first-term Senator JD Vance will be his running mate for the 2024 presidential election. This decision comes after a series of dramatic events, including an assassination attempt on Trump during a campaign rally in Pennsylvania. The announcement has sparked controversy due to Vance's recent comments about the United Kingdom, which he described as potentially the world’s first “Islamist country” with nuclear weapons under a Labour government. JD Vance, who has spent less than two years in Congress, made the contentious remarks during a speech at the National Conservatism Conference. Recounting a conversation with a friend, Vance speculated about which Islamist nation might first acquire nuclear weapons. He said, "We were like ‘maybe it’s Iran, maybe Pakistan already kind of counts’ and then we decided maybe actually it’s the UK since Labour just took over." He further addressed his “Tory friends” in the UK, urging them to address what he perceives as a significant issue. Vance’s remarks have drawn criticism and concern, particularly given the sensitivity of nuclear weapons and international relations. The 39-year-old Republican's comments come at a time when he is transitioning from being a critic of Trump to a staunch supporter. In 2016, Vance reportedly told an associate, "I go back and forth between thinking Trump is a cynical asshole ... or that he's America's Hitler." Despite this, Vance has rallied behind Trump in recent months, aligning himself closely with the former President. Vance is best known for his best-selling memoir "Hillbilly Elegy," which chronicles his blue-collar upbringing in the "rust-belt" Midwest. The Yale-educated entrepreneur and Marine veteran ran for the Senate in 2022, securing a win with Trump's crucial endorsement. His political positions, including his strong anti-abortion stance, have made him a prominent figure within the Republican Party. Recently, he expressed his commitment to Trump, saying, "I want to help him [Trump] however I can." UK Minister Rejects JD Vance's Claim That Britain Is a Nuclear Islamist Country Treasury minister James Murray has firmly rejected the controversial claim by Donald Trump's running mate, JD Vance, that Britain is now the first nuclear "Islamist" country. In a recent response, Murray emphasized the "enormous strength" of diversity in the UK and underscored the importance of the UK's relationship with the United States, irrespective of individual opinions. JD Vance, who was recently announced as Trump’s vice-presidential pick, made the contentious remark at a National Conservatism event. Vance recounted a conversation he had with a friend about which country might be the first truly Islamist nation to obtain a nuclear weapon. He said, "What is the first truly Islamist country that will get a nuclear weapon? And we were like maybe it’s Iran, maybe Pakistan already kinda counts, and then we finally decided maybe it’s actually the UK since Labour just took over." Responding to these comments, James Murray told Sky News, "I don’t know what he means by that. Obviously we disagree on those particular comments that he has made." Murray highlighted the longstanding and significant relationship between the UK and the US, stating, "But the relationship between the UK and the US is more important than any individuals. It’s about the relationship between our countries which goes back so long and which is so important for our national security and economic growth." Pressed further on the "Islamist" label used by Vance, Murray defended the UK's diversity and its new Labour government. "In Britain, we are very proud of our diversity. I’m very proud that we have a new Government, I’m very proud that our Labour government is committed to national security and economic growth. I’m very clear where we are, I don’t really know how that comment fits in." The remarks by Vance have also drawn criticism from other political figures. Shadow veterans minister Andrew Bowie expressed his disapproval, stating, "I disagree with the Labour Party fundamentally on many issues, but I do not agree with that view, quite frankly. I think it’s actually quite offensive, frankly, to my colleagues in the Labour Party." JD Vance, who has been in Congress for less than two years, has quickly become a prominent figure within the Republican Party, thanks in part to his alignment with Trump. His recent comments and rapid political rise have placed him at the center of a heated debate about international relations and national security. The UK government, represented by figures like James Murray, remains focused on maintaining strong ties with the US while celebrating its own diversity. This commitment to diversity and international partnership stands in stark contrast to the divisive rhetoric that has surfaced in the current political climate. Credit: The Standard 2024-07-17 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

President Joe Biden asserted that he has provided more support to the Palestinian community than any other leader when questioned about the United States' strong backing of Israel. This statement came during an interview with Complex’s Speedy Morman, which was filmed on Friday and aired on Complex’s "360 with Speedy" on Monday. When asked why the U.S. support for Israel is so robust, Biden emphasized the historical and security needs that justify a strong Israel. He explained, “If there weren’t an Israel, every Jew in the world would be at risk. Every Jew in the world would be at risk. And so there’s a need for it to be strong, and a need for Israel to be able to have after World War II … the ability for Jews to have a place that was their own.” Biden underscored his support for Israel by identifying as a Zionist, saying, “But you don’t have to be a Jew to be a Zionist, and a Zionist is about whether or not Israel is a safe haven for Jews because of their history of how they’ve been persecuted.” However, Biden did not shy away from highlighting his efforts to support the Palestinian community. He pointed to his actions to facilitate humanitarian aid to Gaza, noting, “By the way, I’m the guy that did more for the Palestinian community than anybody. I’m the guy that opened up all the assets. I’m the guy that made sure that I got the Egyptians to open the border to let goods through, medicine and food.” He stressed his commitment to Palestinians while criticizing Hamas, saying, “I’ve been very supportive of the Palestinians. But Hamas are a bunch of thugs.” The discussion also referenced the ongoing Israel-Hamas conflict. Former President Donald Trump criticized Biden’s handling of the situation during a debate last month, accusing him of being weak on the issue. Trump stated, “Israel is the one. And you should let them go and let them go finish the job. He doesn’t want to do it.” Trump further added, “He’s become like a Palestinian, but hey, don’t like him because he’s a very bad Palestinian. He’s a weak one.” In response to Trump’s accusations, Biden dismissed them as “foolishness.” He revealed that he had proposed a three-phase cease-fire deal in May, which would have established at least a six-week pause in fighting. However, the deal remains stalled as mediators continue to negotiate its terms. Biden’s comments highlight the complexity of his administration’s stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, balancing strong support for Israel with measures aimed at aiding the Palestinian community. This dual approach reflects the ongoing challenge of addressing the needs and concerns of both sides in one of the world’s most enduring conflicts. Credit: Hill 2024-07-17 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Adam Whittington, a former police officer and the founder of Project Rescue Children (PRC), has been accused of fabricating stories to raise funds for his charity, the BBC has revealed. Whittington, who claims to have saved over 700 children from human traffickers in countries like Uganda, Kenya, and The Gambia, has allegedly misled donors and misused funds intended for children in need. Whittington, a British-Australian citizen, has accumulated a significant following on social media, with over 1.5 million followers, partly due to the shocking and sometimes disturbing content he shares. His charity has also garnered celebrity support, including from Sam Faiers of ITV’s "The Only Way is Essex." Faiers, who became a PRC ambassador, raised £137,000 ($175,000) to build a rescue centre in Uganda after visiting orphaned and destitute children there. However, allegations against PRC began to surface on social media soon after the fundraising drive, with former ambassadors and directors accusing the charity of financial mismanagement and fabricating stories about children. BBC File on 4's investigation found that less than half of the funds raised by Faiers—£58,000 ($74,000)—were sent to PRC's Ugandan partner organization, Make a Child Smile. Alexander Ssembatya, the founder of the Ugandan organization, claimed the rest of the money was “eaten by Adam Whittington and PRC.” Construction of the rescue centre stalled due to the lack of funds. Sam Faiers expressed her dismay, stating she was "deeply appalled" and "heartbroken" to learn that not all the funds had reached the children. She urged Whittington to release the remaining funds immediately. PRC, however, claimed the money provided was sufficient for the construction and accused Ssembatya of refusing to sign a contract and mismanaging funds. They stated that the remaining money had been spent on other children in Uganda and the Philippines. Further investigation by the BBC revealed that PRC's supposed rescue centre in Kenya was a sham. Whittington had posted detailed and distressing stories about children allegedly supported at the centre, but a visit to the location by the BBC team in April 2024 found no children and discovered that the property was merely the home of an elderly lady named Jane Gori. Gori's son, Kupa Gori, was PRC's director in Kenya and had brought Whittington to visit her home. Photos of improvement work funded by PRC at Gori’s house were used to convince donors of the rescue centre’s existence. The investigation also uncovered the case of a baby named Mireya, whom Whittington claimed to have rescued from traffickers in The Gambia in a dramatic mission. Whittington used this story to raise funds and even convinced his UK director, Alex Betts, to adopt the child with him. However, the BBC found no evidence of the rescue mission. Betts, an online influencer, had met a baby during a visit to The Gambia, but it turned out that the child had been borrowed from her mother in a nearby village. The mother, who lived in poverty, had never received any money from PRC, only occasional groceries. When confronted with the findings, PRC maintained that Mireya’s story was true and invited the BBC to carry out a DNA test on the child. They claimed the Bass home was a PRC rescue centre and that Mireya was overseas visiting relatives. The Gambian authorities are now investigating Whittington and PRC for potential legal violations, with Lamin Fatty from the Child Protection Alliance stating that multiple laws may have been broken. Whittington's background includes service in the Australian Army and the Metropolitan Police. Despite the serious allegations, the full extent of PRC’s financial activities remains unclear due to the lack of detailed accounts filed by Whittington's various entities. The UK’s Charity Commission rejected PRC's registration application in 2022 due to unresolved "significant issues." PRC's charitable status in Australia has also been revoked following the BBC's investigation. Whittington, currently residing in Russia, did not respond to requests for an interview. Since the investigation began, some content has been removed from PRC’s website, and Whittington has been banned from Instagram. Despite these developments, Whittington continues to raise funds and claims to be expanding PRC's operations to South Africa. The BBC’s investigation has exposed significant discrepancies and alleged fraudulent activities within PRC, casting doubt on the legitimacy of Whittington's charity work and raising serious questions about the use of donated funds. Credit: BBC 2024-07-17 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Britain’s armed forces must be prepared to confront a "deadly quartet" of global threats from China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea, according to Lord Robertson, the surprise pick to lead a comprehensive review of the UK's defences. This major review comes as a response to the perceived need for Britain to bolster its military capabilities in the face of these emerging threats. Lord Robertson, a former Labour defence secretary and ex-NATO chief, has been brought back to the forefront of military policy by Sir Keir Starmer. Robertson previously led Labour's last Strategic Defence Review (SDR) over 25 years ago. In an innovative move, the government also announced the inclusion of two other external experts to assist in shaping the future structure and size of the armed forces. One of these experts is Fiona Hill, a former foreign policy adviser to the Trump administration who testified against the former president during his impeachment trial. Hill, a British-born expert on Russia who holds US citizenship, has previously likened Donald Trump to Russian President Vladimir Putin. Trump has dismissed her criticisms, saying, "She doesn't know the first thing she's talking about. If she didn't have the accent, she would be nothing." Speaking about her new role, Hill stated, "This review could not be more timely given the current global turmoil and rapid technological change. I am honoured to participate in this important and critical exercise." The third reviewer, General Sir Richard Barrons, is a highly-regarded four-star general who was once considered for the role of head of the armed forces before his retirement in 2016. At a news conference launching the government's new defence review, Lord Robertson emphasized the need for "fresh thinking" to address the "threats and challenges" the nation faces. He warned, "We're confronted by a deadly quartet of nations increasingly working together. We in this country and the NATO alliance have got to be able to confront that particular quartet as well as the other problems that are pervading the world." The explicit description of China as "deadly" marks a shift from the more nuanced language previously used by the UK government regarding Beijing. Although Robertson did not name the quartet, it is widely understood to include China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea. John Healey, the current defence secretary, stated that the external team would collaborate with the "deep expertise" within the Ministry of Defence. The review, he promised, would be delivered "at pace" within the first half of next year, incorporating input from academia, think tanks, and even journalists. Healey acknowledged the enduring challenges of a military diminished by decades of cost-saving cuts, coupled with limited financial resources for necessary transformation. Despite the government’s pledge to increase defence spending to 2.5% of national income from the current 2.2%, no specific timeline has been offered. Speaking candidly, Healey admitted that even an increase in funding would not be a "magic wand" to solve all problems. "If we simply use additional funding to relieve some of the pressures in present programs and plans, we will fail to get to grips with the very serious situation we face and the changes we must make to be better fit to fight in the future, better able to defend Britain, and better able to deter the threats that we may face in the future as well." Healey also expressed a desire for the wider defence sector to play a larger role in the government's plans to boost economic growth. "In many ways, defence is the untold story of economic growth and the economic engine in Britain," he noted, highlighting that the average wage in the defence industry is 40% higher than other manufacturing sectors, with 70% of defence jobs located outside London and the South East. "For a government that wants to drive growth, improve productivity, and spread wealth creation, defence is one of the cornerstones of a new industrial strategy," Healey emphasized. The defence secretary will oversee the review, with the three external reviewers providing regular updates to him, the prime minister, and the chancellor. They will be supported by a Defence Review Team consisting of experts from both inside and outside the government. As Britain faces an increasingly complex global landscape, this review aims to ensure that the country’s armed forces are fully equipped to meet current and future challenges. Credit: Sky News 2024-07-17 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In a significant legal move, New York State Attorney General Letitia James has filed a lawsuit to block a newly signed law in Nassau County that bans transgender athletes from participating in women’s and girls’ sports at county-owned athletic facilities. The lawsuit was promptly filed moments after Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman signed the legislation into law, following its passage by the local Republican-led legislature the previous month. Blakeman initially sought to enforce this prohibition through an executive order. However, the order was overturned in court after a lawsuit filed by the New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU) on behalf of the Long Island Roller Rebels. With the new law, James has joined the legal fray, aligning herself with the NYCLU, which has also filed a separate suit challenging the ban in Nassau County Supreme Court. During a press conference, Blakeman defended the ban, asserting that it is unfair for transgender women and girls to compete against biological females due to scientific evidence indicating that biological males are generally stronger, bigger, and faster. He stated, “We’re protecting the integrity, fairness, and safety in women’s sports. It’s a matter of common sense.” Blakeman also highlighted the support of Caitlyn Jenner, one of the world’s most famous transgender individuals. Jenner, formerly known as Bruce Jenner, won the 1976 gold medal in the decathlon and has publicly supported restrictions on transgender athletes in women’s sports. “She stood here with us and said, ‘You’re doing the right thing,’” Blakeman noted, referring to Jenner’s endorsement. In stark contrast, James argued that the Nassau ban violates New York laws that prohibit discrimination based on gender identity or expression. She emphasized, “With this law, Nassau County is once again attempting to exclude transgender girls and women from participating in sporting events while claiming to support fairness. NYCLU and the Long Island Roller Rebels won their first lawsuit, and County Executive Blakeman’s transphobic executive order was struck down because it was blatantly illegal. Now this discriminatory law must be as well.” James stressed that every person in New York has the right to be exactly who they are, free from discrimination, and vowed that her office would always protect that right. NYCLU staff attorney Gabriella Lario echoed James’ sentiments, condemning Nassau County’s continued efforts to exclude transgender women and girls from sports. Lario declared, “It is abundantly clear that any attempt to ban trans women and girls from sports is prohibited by our state’s anti-discrimination laws. It was true when we successfully struck down County Executive Blakeman’s transphobic policy, and it is true now. This latest round of hateful legislation is unacceptable, and we won’t let it stand in New York.” The controversy in Nassau County mirrors a national debate over transgender athletes competing in women’s sports, with conservatives typically supporting such bans and liberals opposing them. Blakeman claimed that he has received support from lesbian athletes and has not encountered opposition from the LGBT community in Nassau. He contended, “There are a few people out there with a narrow view who say this is an anti-transgender bill — and it’s not.” A Siena College poll conducted in April found that 66% of New York voters support a ban on transgender athletes competing against girls, while 27% oppose such measures. The poll indicated that support for the ban spans across party lines, racial, ethnic, and regional demographics, with only self-identified liberals generally opposing it. Credit: NYP 2024-07-17 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe