Social Media

Trump's 'Golden Age': A Two-Week Blitz of Political Dominance and Policy Wins President Donald Trump has entered what allies and even some critics are calling the most powerful phase of his presidency, as he capped a whirlwind fortnight of domestic and international achievements with the passage of the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act.” At 79, the president is riding a wave of political and legislative victories that many consider unprecedented, even as skeptics warn of deepening national divides. The legislation, passed on Thursday, fulfills several of Trump’s long-standing campaign promises, including tax cuts on tips, overtime, and Social Security benefits. Trump plans to sign the bill at a festive Independence Day event on the White House lawn, where B-2 stealth bombers will conduct a flyover in tribute to their role in the June 21 U.S. airstrikes on Iran’s nuclear sites. Just two days after the strikes, Trump brokered a surprise ceasefire between Israel and Iran — a diplomatic breakthrough that stunned foreign policy observers. Trump's influence was also on full display at the recent NATO summit, where he successfully pressured member nations to commit to increasing military spending to 5% of GDP by 2035. Back home, the Supreme Court handed him key wins on immigration policy and judicial power, while CBS’s parent company agreed to pay $16 million after airing a deceptively edited interview with Vice President Kamala Harris. In a flurry of additional developments, Canada scrapped its digital services tax on American tech companies, the University of Pennsylvania revoked accolades from transgender swimmer Lia Thomas, and the administration unveiled a forthcoming trade deal with Vietnam. The stock market soared to record highs while illegal border crossings dropped to record lows. The sweeping legislation also provides $25 billion for Trump’s "Golden Dome" missile defense initiative, expands tax deductions for car loans, and lifts the cap on state and local tax deductions to $40,000. These provisions have drawn praise from Republicans in high-tax states like New York and New Jersey. “I didn’t vote for him and I’m not always aligned with his approach, but his success on the domestic and international front in such a compressed period of time is nothing short of remarkable,” said Michael LaRosa, a former Biden White House spokesman. “It’s all due to his impressive use of political and executive power.” Another former Biden official added, “You voted for it because you’re scared of the guy. And frankly, that’s impressive, given that Biden never invoked fear in anyone.” Chris LaCivita, co-manager of Trump’s 2024 campaign, framed the momentum as a historic political shift. “If you work, pay taxes and aspire for a better tomorrow, you are voting Republican,” he said. “This transformation in political power is because of the leadership and determination of one person — President Trump.” Kellyanne Conway, a longtime Trump ally, declared, “These have been the most consequential two weeks of Trump’s second term, as he makes peace deals, trade deals and tax deals, everywhere all at once. America is in its Golden Age.” Vivek Ramaswamy, now running for governor of Ohio, echoed the enthusiasm. “President Trump is on a roll,” he said. “By 2026, it will be up to the states to lead the way on other critical fronts.” Still, challenges remain. Trump has set a July 9 deadline for finalizing bilateral trade deals to prevent retaliatory tariffs that could spike consumer prices. Thus far, only agreements with China, the UK, Vietnam, and a "roadmap" with India have been announced. Meanwhile, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell has resisted pressure to lower interest rates, keeping borrowing costs high despite easing inflation. American University professor Leonard Steinhorn noted that Trump’s dominance, while potent, is polarizing. “He presides over half a country that believes he is taking us on a very bad path,” he said, warning of authoritarian tendencies. LaRosa urged fellow Democrats to learn from Trump’s strategy. “Even though I may disagree with him substantively, his effective use of power as an executive and party leader is something to admire,” he said. “Democrats should learn from him and replicate it the next time we have the keys.” Adapted by ASEAN Now from NYP 2025-07-05

Can Diddy Reclaim His Throne? A Legacy Tarnished and a Future in Question In the wake of a divisive verdict in Sean "Diddy" Combs' high-profile trial in New York, tensions flared outside the courthouse as supporters and critics clashed in the summer heat. Some protesters argued the music mogul should have been found guilty on more serious charges, while others—chanting "Free Diddy" and dousing themselves in baby oil—celebrated what they saw as a vindication. The mixed jury verdict offered no easy resolution. While Combs was acquitted of racketeering conspiracy and sex trafficking, he was convicted on two counts of transporting women, including former girlfriend Cassie, across state lines for sex acts and prostitution. The convictions could carry a sentence of up to 10 years each, though legal experts anticipate a lighter sentence, potentially allowing Combs to walk free within a few years. Despite the serious charges and the salacious details that emerged—graphic accounts of drug-fueled "freak offs" involving male escorts, violence, and baby oil—some industry insiders believe Combs may attempt a comeback. “He was one of the most famous people in hip-hop,” said August Brown, music writer for the Los Angeles Times. “He was an incredibly important figure in evolving both that genre and the music industry as a whole into a commercial juggernaut.” Indeed, Combs’ influence on 1990s and early 2000s music is undeniable. As founder of Bad Boy Records, he launched the careers of iconic artists like The Notorious B.I.G., Mary J. Blige, Faith Evans, and 112. He also collaborated with Mariah Carey, Usher, and Busta Rhymes, and earned three Grammy Awards, including for his 1997 hit “I’ll Be Missing You,” a tribute to B.I.G. But the trial dragged a darker side of Combs into the spotlight. The jury was asked to decide whether his actions amounted to criminal coercion or were part of a consensual, albeit extreme, lifestyle. “The jury was just unpersuaded that what amounted to an extremely baroque and violent and drug-stoked sex life on Diddy's behalf amounted to a criminal organisation,” Brown explained to BBC World Service. Still, the two convictions and the sordid revelations may be impossible to erase from the public consciousness. “I cannot imagine any kind of redemption arc as far as him remaining as an artist or a music mogul,” Brown said. “I think the public will remember him as an important figure whose name is now permanently associated with this very-difficult-to-process range of charges.” Others in the industry agree. “He's definitely going to try, but I think the damage is just too irreparable at this point,” said Alvin Blanco, content director of Hiphopwired.com. Mark Anthony Neal, professor at Duke University, echoed the sentiment: “There’s no doubt” Combs’ legacy is tarnished, especially given his role in taking hip-hop “from the ghettos to the mainstream of America to the global mainstream.” Even before the trial, Combs’ relevance in the music world had waned. “He doesn't really have much of a music career any more, and he hasn't for about 15 years,” said Variety’s Jem Aswad. “He just moved on to other businesses—beverages, apparel... Anything he did in music over the last 15 years was almost just for fun.” Yet his profile had not completely faded. His 2023 album The Love Album: Off The Grid was Grammy-nominated, and he received MTV’s Global Icon award. And in the digital age, fallen stars can retain fanbases. R. Kelly, serving 30 years for sex trafficking, still attracts millions of listeners online. Supporters believe Diddy’s fan loyalty might outlast his legal woes. Anoushka Mutanda-Dougherty, host of the Diddy on Trial podcast, said, “I feel like he will be able to reclaim a top spot in hip-hop just because of the sheer amount of support we’ve seen online and here at the courthouse… He won’t be the first musician to be a convicted criminal who carries on having a music career, especially in hip-hop.” But for others, the stains of the case are too indelible. Angela Star, a content creator who watched the verdict live, summed up the lasting impression: “His image is tainted, and when you think of Diddy now, you think of…” She let the sentence trail off, holding up a bottle of baby oil in silence. Whether Sean Combs will stage a comeback or fade into infamy remains to be seen. What’s clear is that the legacy he once built has been irrevocably transformed. Adapted by ASEAN Now from BBC 2025-07-05

@BLMFem your trolling response was removed. 17. ASEAN NOW news team collects news articles from various recognised and reputable news sources. The articles may be consolidated from different sources and rewritten with AI assistance These news items are shared in our forums for members to stay informed and engaged. Our dedicated news team puts in the effort to deliver quality content, and we ask for your respect in return. Any disrespectful comments about our news articles or the content itself, such as calling it "clickbait" or “slow news day”, and criticising grammatical errors, will not be tolerated and appropriate action will be taken. Please note that republished articles may contain errors or opinions that do not reflect the views of ASEAN NOW. If you'd like to help us, and you see an error with an article, then please use the report function so that we can attend to it promptly.

@bannork your post on an AP report has been removed. It was already posted by another member on the same page, since then you've double posted twice. Please stop it and read the topic before posting duplicate articles. Another post that was a general article on the number of deaths in Gaza in the last few days has also been removed. This topic is: US Pushes Forward with Private Aid Plan for Gaza Amid UN Opposition

North Korea Poised to Send Tens of Thousands More Troops to Aid Russia in Ukraine, Intelligence Reports Reveal North Korea is preparing to significantly expand its military support for Russia in the war against Ukraine by deploying up to 30,000 troops, according to Ukrainian and Western intelligence assessments seen by CNN. If confirmed, this would mark a dramatic increase from the 11,000 North Korean soldiers already sent last year, some of whom reportedly played a role in repelling Ukraine’s advance into Russia’s Kursk region. According to Ukrainian officials, the incoming forces could arrive within months. “There is a great possibility the North Korean troops will be engaged in combat in parts of Russian-occupied Ukraine,” one intelligence document states, noting they could participate in large-scale offensives. The Russian military is reportedly prepared to equip and integrate these troops into their combat units. Satellite imagery reviewed by CNN suggests preparations are already underway. Cargo planes, possibly IL-76s, have been observed at Sunan airport in North Korea, while troop-transporting ships have docked at Dunai port in Russia, consistent with past deployments. Joe Byrne, a senior analyst at the Open Source Centre, said, “This appears to indicate the routes previously used to move DPRK troops are active, and could be used in any large-scale future transfer of personnel.” Jenny Town of the Stimson Center said the 30,000 figure sounded “high… but they can certainly come up with that number. They won’t be elite soldiers.” She added, “There have been rumors that Russian generals have been inside North Korea training troops there already.” Ukrainian Defense Minister Rustem Umerov warned that such deployments expose serious issues within Russia’s own forces. “Russia’s use of elite North Korean troops demonstrates not only a growing reliance on totalitarian regimes but also serious problems with its mobilization reserve,” he said. “Together with our partners, we are monitoring these threats and will respond accordingly.” The Kremlin has publicly acknowledged its military partnership with Pyongyang. Sergei Shoigu, formerly Russia’s defense minister and now a top Putin aide, visited North Korea twice in June, announcing that 1,000 North Korean sappers and 5,000 military construction workers would be sent to Russia to clear mines and repair infrastructure. South Korea’s intelligence agency has separately briefed lawmakers that Pyongyang is selecting additional personnel for overseas deployment as early as July or August. Videos aired by Russian state media and verified by CNN show North Korean soldiers entrenched near Kursk, living in fortified bunkers adorned with Korean posters reading, “Revenge for our fallen comrades.” Russian trainers praise their physical preparedness, saying, “As fighters they are not worse than ours. The enemy runs away first.” Joint training exercises have also increased. One video shows North Korean and Russian troops practicing urban combat together. Another depicts North Korean troops learning to use shotguns against drones—highlighting the growing interoperability between both militaries. Kim Jong Un’s support for Russia appears to extend beyond manpower. Ukrainian intelligence has documented 82 ballistic missile strikes using North Korean-made KN-23 and KN-24 missiles, including one in Pokrovsk in January 2024 that killed 11 civilians. Translated North Korean artillery manuals and the widespread presence of North Korean weaponry further demonstrate the depth of cooperation. The UN recently reported that North Korea had supplied Russia with at least 100 ballistic missiles and nine million artillery shells this year alone. Meanwhile, South Korea’s military reported an additional 3,000 North Korean troops were sent to Russia earlier this year. Town believes Pyongyang views this as a long-term investment. “The more ‘blood debt’ there is between them,” she said, “the more North Korea will benefit in the long run, even if they are making sacrifices in the short term.” Adapted by ASEAN Now from CNN 2025-07-04

Lily Allen Opens Up on Abortions and the Right to Choose: “I Don’t Want a Baby is Reason Enough” Lily Allen has made frank and powerful admissions about her reproductive past, speaking candidly about multiple abortions and challenging the need for women to justify their decisions. Appearing alongside her close friend Miquita Oliver on their podcast Miss Me?, the 40-year-old singer didn’t hold back when describing her experience with contraception and pregnancy. Performing at Galstonbury Lily Allen dedicated ‘fu*k you’ to the supreme court after the overturning of roe v. wade “I just remember I have an IUD now,” she said. “I think I’m on my third maybe fourth and I just remember before that it was a complete disaster area. Yeah, I’d get pregnant all the time, all the time.” Miquita, 41, seemed surprised and confessed she didn’t know if Lily had ever had a termination. In response, Lily began singing a parody of Frank Sinatra’s My Way: “Abortions I’ve had a few... but then again... I can’t remember exactly how many.” She giggled before adding, “I can’t remember. I think maybe like, I want to say four or five.” Miquita admitted, “I’ve had about five too! Lily I’m so happy I can say that and you can say it and no one came to shoot us down, no judgment. We’ve had about the same amount of abortions.” Reflecting on her past relationships, Lily recalled one situation where a former partner offered to pay for her abortion. “I remember once getting pregnant and the man paying for my abortion, and me thinking it was so romantic!” Miquita responded in kind: “I actually think that is romantic! Do you not think that’s romantic?” Lily questioned herself, “Am I an idiot? What? Getting rid of the problem?” Miquita pushed the idea further: “No but if you’re both like ‘let’s not do this. I don’t want it no neither do I, I don’t have any money well I can sort that out…’” Lily, however, disagreed. “No I don’t think it’s generous or romantic. Think about that investment, like that’s how much is it 500 quid? Kids are a lot more expensive.” She also revealed that after the abortion, the man never contacted her again, adding, “I mean fair tbh. I was a f*ing crazy b** – still am!” Miquita reflected on her own early experience, saying, “I was very excited! I felt like I was like a woman.” She even recalled bumping into old school friends at a contraceptive clinic, saying that starting her contraceptive journey made her feel like “it meant I was having sex.” Yet despite the personal empowerment, she admitted, “I felt really embarrassed to even say that I had more than one abortion, why the f*** should I be ashamed? I have had a few.” Lily, who has two daughters with ex-husband Sam Cooper, took issue with societal expectations for women to explain their choices. “It actually irritates me,” she said. “I’ve seen memes going around sometimes, on Instagram from pro-abortion accounts or whatever, whenever this conversation comes up, and suddenly you start seeing people posting things about extraordinary reasons for having an abortion. Like: ‘My aunt had a kid that had this disability,’ or whatever, ‘if she went full term it was going to kill her, so we have to.’ It’s like, shut up! Just: ‘I don’t want a f***ing baby right now.’ Literally: ‘Don’t want a baby’ is enough reason.” In 2022, Allen was vocal following the US Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Roe v Wade. On stage with Olivia Rodrigo at Glastonbury, she performed her hit F** You* in protest. Olivia told the crowd, “I’m devastated and terrified [by the ruling] and so many women and girls are going to die because of this.” She went on to dedicate the song to the five justices who voted to overturn the landmark ruling, and Allen added, “We hate you guys!” Later on Instagram, Lily reiterated her message: “Most people I know, myself included, just didn’t want to have a f***ing baby and that is reason enough. We don’t have to justify it.” The conversation comes amid sweeping legal changes in the UK, where MPs recently voted to decriminalise women terminating their own pregnancies. The legislation, passed by 379 votes to 137, will protect women from prosecution for ending their pregnancies themselves, even without medical approval or beyond the current 24-week legal limit. However, criminal penalties remain for medical professionals who breach the law and for partners who interfere without consent. Lily Allen’s outspoken stance adds a raw, personal voice to a debate that remains deeply political—and deeply personal. Adapted by ASEAN Now from Daily Mail 2025-07-04

Diane Abbott has joined a small group of Labour and former Labour MPs in opposing a government move to designate the pro-Palestinian group Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation. Despite the rebellion, the legislation passed overwhelmingly in the House of Commons on Wednesday with 385 votes in favour and just 26 against—a majority of 359. Nine Labour MPs voted against the proscription, along with several independent MPs including former party leader Jeremy Corbyn and ex-shadow chancellor John McDonnell. The measure is now set to go before the House of Lords, with a vote expected Thursday. If passed, membership in or support for Palestine Action could become a criminal offence carrying a penalty of up to 14 years in prison. Security minister Dan Jarvis defended the government's position, saying, “Palestine Action is not a legitimate protest group. People engaged in lawful protest don’t need weapons. People engaged in lawful protest do not throw smoke bombs and fire pyrotechnics around innocent members of the public. And people engaged in lawful protest do not cause millions of pounds of damage to national security infrastructure, including submarines and defence equipment for Nato.” The government’s decision follows an incident on June 20 in which two aircraft were vandalised at RAF Brize Norton—an attack claimed by Palestine Action. Five individuals have since been arrested on suspicion of terrorism-related offences. Jarvis described the act as “just the latest episode in Palestine Action’s long history of harmful activity,” adding, “Palestine Action has orchestrated a nationwide campaign of property damage featuring attacks that have resulted in serious damage to property and crossed the threshold from direct criminal action into terrorism.” But the move has sparked fierce criticism from several MPs. Zarah Sultana, Independent MP for Coventry South, called the proscription a “draconian overreach” and compared it to the criminalisation of historical protest movements like the Suffragettes. “To equate a spray can of paint with a suicide bomb isn’t just absurd, it is grotesque,” she said. “It is a deliberate distortion of the law to chill dissent, criminalise solidarity and suppress the truth.” Clive Lewis, Labour MP for Norwich South and a former soldier, also raised serious concerns. “I understand what terrorism is. I was in London on July 7 in 2005 and I watched my community, this city, attacked by real terrorists,” he said. “And at that point, rightly or wrongly, I decided I was going to Afghanistan to fight the terrorists. And I went because I love this country, and I love our democracy, and I want to see it protected. I think today’s proscription order against Palestine Action undermines that and I wish my Government wouldn’t do it.” Outside Parliament, the fallout was immediate. More than 1,000 demonstrators gathered in Westminster for a protest against the planned ban. Among the speakers were Jeremy Corbyn, Ayoub Khan and John McDonnell, who said the proscription “was an attack on democracy and an attack on all of us.” The protest was punctuated with chants of “free, free Palestine” and “from the river to the sea.” Tensions escalated when two men draped in Israeli flags appeared, prompting louder chants, including “death, death to the IDF” and “IDF are terrorists.” The protest also saw four arrests, including a man who blocked Downing Street’s gates with his mobility scooter and a woman who locked herself onto a suitcase outside Parliament. The Metropolitan Police cited breaches of Public Order Act conditions imposed to manage the protest. Palestine Action has stated it will seek a legal challenge against its proscription. A hearing scheduled for Friday will determine whether the ban can be temporarily blocked while a longer legal process unfolds. Meanwhile, MPs also voted to proscribe two white supremacist organisations: the Maniacs Murder Cult, a neo-Nazi group linked to global violence, and the Russian Imperial Movement, whose paramilitary arm has fought alongside Russian forces in Ukraine. Lord Walney, former government adviser on political violence, welcomed the vote, saying, “This is not about banning peaceful protest but putting a stop to a group known for its use of violence and intimidation of workers.” He warned Labour to take a hard line: “Labour must make clear to the rebels that once proscription is in place, any further sympathy for this group will result in their immediate expulsion from the Party.” Related Topics: Palestine Action Echo Glastonbury Chant ‘death to the IDF’ ‘Damage as much as possible’ Undercover with Palestine Action How in Just 5 Years The Corbynista Huda Ammori Steered Palestine Action's Militant Campaign Watch: Activists Claim Damage to RAF Military Aircraft in Protest Against Gaza Operations Sabotage Campaign Targets UK Defence Suppliers in Unrelenting Attacks Activists Vandalize Trump’s Turnberry Golf Course in Pro-Palestinian Protest Pro-Palestinian Students Vandalize Cambridge University's Senate House in Gaza Protest Pro-Palestine Activists Vandalize Barclays and JP Morgan Buildings in Leeds Pro-Palestine Mobs Wreck Barclays Banks Across the UK 7 Activists Face Court Alleged Terrorist-Related Actions at Israeli Defence Firm UK Site Adapted by ASEAN Now from The Telegraph 2025-07-04

Rumbling in the Swamp: Quiet Talks Begin to Launch a Viable Third Party in U.S. Politics Behind closed doors in Washington, a quiet rebellion is brewing as prominent political figures from both the Republican and Democratic parties engage in secret discussions about forming a third major political party, according to revelations from The Swamp newsletter. Driven by frustration with the state of their respective parties, a mix of disillusioned Republicans and centrist Democrats are reportedly seeking to reshape the American political landscape. At the heart of this emerging effort is a sense of alienation among Republicans who feel their party has been hijacked by Donald Trump and Democrats increasingly at odds with the progressive wing. “The Republican Party, as many of us know it, no longer exists,” said one unnamed source with direct knowledge of the discussions. “We do not recognize ourselves anymore in Trump’s administration. There is a strong movement out there in the party to reclaim the values we were raised on and reclaim the middle ground.” Talks are still in their early stages, but The Swamp reports that some "serious" and nationally recognized names are already involved. While not all have committed to formally breaking away from the traditional two-party system, insiders believe the momentum is growing. “If agreement can be reached,” a source said, “they believe it could transform the face of U.S. politics.” The idea of a viable third party is not new, but this time the drive seems to have deeper roots and stronger resolve. Gallup polls have shown for over two decades that a majority of Americans believe the Republican and Democratic parties do “such a poor job” representing the people that a third party is needed. Nevertheless, institutional barriers, especially the control the two major parties have over redistricting, remain a significant hurdle. Fueling this unrest on the Democratic side is the recent political earthquake in New York, where progressive candidate Zohran Mamdani soundly defeated former Governor Andrew Cuomo in the Democratic mayoral primary. Although the cross-party talks reportedly began before this upset, the result has intensified some Democrats' determination to explore new political options. Meanwhile, on the Republican side, Trump's threats to primary any lawmaker who defies him continue to breed resentment among moderates. The fear of being “Trumped” into submission has left many feeling cornered and eager for a new direction. “There’s a hunger for an alternative that’s not just anti-Trump, but genuinely representative of moderate, common-sense values,” another source suggested. Into this complex mix entered Elon Musk, reigniting speculation about his potential entry into politics. The billionaire tech mogul threatened once again to launch his own "America Party" after Trump’s controversial “big, beautiful bill” passed the Senate thanks to a tie-breaking vote by JD Vance. While Musk’s involvement added a dramatic twist, The Swamp reports that he has been excluded from the more serious third-party negotiations. According to insiders, his antics have “enraged most of Washington” and made him an unwelcome participant in the budding coalition. While no formal announcement is expected soon, and the group remains unnamed, those close to the effort remain cautiously optimistic. As one Democratic insider confirmed, “There have been some cross-party discussions.” Whether those talks will ultimately lead to a historic political realignment or fade into the background remains to be seen. But for now, something is stirring in the political shadows of Washington. Adapted by ASEAN Now from Daily Beast 2025-07-04

‘The Trump Effect’: Border Crossings Hit Record Low Amid Tough Immigration Stance Illegal border crossings have dropped to the lowest level in recorded U.S. history, with just 6,070 migrants apprehended at the southern border in June, according to former Immigration and Customs Enforcement Director Tom Homan. Writing on X Tuesday, Homan credited the dramatic decline to what he called “the Trump effect,” citing President Trump’s aggressive deportation strategy and zero-release policy as central to the shift. “President Trump has created the most secure border in the history of the nation and the data proves it. We have never seen numbers this low. Never,” Homan declared. He emphasized that none of the migrants caught last month were released into the U.S., a break from previous policies under the Biden administration. The significant downturn follows months of escalating enforcement, including mass deportations and interior immigration crackdowns, which Homan said have successfully dissuaded potential migrants from attempting illegal entry. “God bless the men and women of the US Border Patrol and God bless the men and women of ICE. The interior arrests and consequences help to drive down illegal immigration. The TRUMP EFFECT keeps America winning,” he wrote. The numbers reflect a sharp reversal from border activity under President Biden. In a pointed comparison, Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Rodney Scott noted that more migrants were apprehended during the first two days of June 2024 — over 7,000 — than in all of June under the current policy. On Saturday alone, only 137 migrants were caught crossing the border. “That is less than a single day under Biden,” Homan said. “As a matter of fact, the total number of encounters is less than half of a single day under Biden on many days. Also, none of the 6,070 were released into the U.S. ZERO.” The decline is particularly stark when compared to previous years. In June 2024, over 83,000 migrants crossed the southern border. That number climbed to 99,000 in June 2023 and reached approximately 192,000 in June 2022, highlighting a consistent downward trend since Trump’s reimplementation of stricter immigration measures earlier this year. Trump’s first notable benchmark came in February when just 8,347 migrants crossed the border, according to federal data. The June numbers now represent an all-time low since modern tracking began. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem also praised the administration’s approach in a statement posted to X on Wednesday. “The world is hearing our message: the border is closed to law breakers. Under President Trump, our Border Patrol agents are empowered to do their job once again, secure our border, and protect the American people,” she wrote. With the 2024 election looming and immigration remaining a top issue for voters, the Trump administration appears determined to frame its approach as both effective and uncompromising. Whether the drop in crossings is sustainable over the long term remains to be seen, but for now, the administration is claiming victory in its fight to control the southern border. Adapted by ASEAN Now from NYP 2025-07-04

Trump's Summer Surge: Wins at Home and Abroad Mark a Golden Moment for the President President Donald Trump is entering the Independence Day holiday riding a wave of political momentum, as recent victories in foreign policy, immigration, trade, and the Supreme Court have given the White House a powerful tailwind. The string of achievements has emboldened Trump’s allies and further solidified his grip on the Republican Party as Democrats continue to struggle with internal divisions and an unclear message. “President Trump is delivering win after win for the American people, and we are the hottest nation in the world,” said White House spokesperson Liz Huston. “The One, Big, Beautiful Bill is going to pass, Iran’s nuclear capabilities are obliterated, the stock market is at record highs, the border is the most secure it’s ever been, and the Supreme Court just ended nationwide injunctions that were being abused to halt the rest of the America First agenda. Thanks to President Trump — the Golden Age of America is here.” The momentum has been building steadily since June 21, when Trump ordered strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites. Though the move initially drew skepticism from both Democrats and some Republicans concerned about escalation in the Middle East, it appeared to yield results. The strikes were followed by a ceasefire agreement between Israel and Iran that has held for a week—an unexpected breakthrough that Trump’s allies hailed as proof of his strategic prowess. “He’s had the best seven to 10 days of his presidency of either term,” said Republican strategist Ford O’Connell, pointing to foreign policy accomplishments, including the strikes on Iran, growing NATO commitments, and a potential Gaza ceasefire, as particularly impressive. Trump further boosted his foreign policy credentials with a successful appearance at the NATO summit in the Netherlands. There, member nations agreed to increase defense spending, a long-standing demand of Trump’s. NATO’s secretary-general publicly credited the president with pushing the alliance toward a more equitable financial burden. On Tuesday, Trump announced that Israel had agreed to a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza and urged Hamas to accept the terms. If finalized, the agreement would mark yet another diplomatic win for Trump, though a lasting peace remains elusive. Trade policy also swung in Trump’s favor this week. Canada walked back its plan for a digital tax aimed at U.S. tech companies, a reversal the White House credited to Trump’s pressure. “Canada caved,” said press secretary Karoline Leavitt, referencing the president’s threat to suspend trade talks. Trump also unveiled a framework for a trade agreement with Vietnam, potentially paving the way for broader deals ahead of his July 9 deadline for new tariffs. Domestically, Trump scored a legal victory when the Supreme Court curtailed the use of nationwide injunctions by lower courts—an important limitation for an administration that frequently clashed with the judiciary. The decision represents a partial win for Trump’s long-term effort to reshape immigration policy, including controversial moves to narrow birthright citizenship. Meanwhile, the president’s signature issue—border control—reached a milestone. U.S. officials detained just over 6,000 migrants crossing the U.S.-Mexico border in June, marking a historic low. The numbers, first reported by CBS News, provide a major talking point for Trump ahead of November. The final piece of Trump’s current surge could come in the form of the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” a sweeping tax and spending package that includes key elements of his economic and immigration agenda. The bill, which extends Trump’s 2017 tax cuts, eliminates taxes on tipped wages, and boosts border security funding, passed the Senate and now awaits final passage in the House. Though some Republican lawmakers have raised concerns over its impact on the deficit, Trump’s allies believe it’s only a matter of time. “Big day today. Hopefully we get this thing worked out,” said Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) after meeting with Trump and other conservatives at the White House. “The president answered all our questions, was very informative. JD Vance was there. This was a very good day.” Adapted by ASEAN Now from The Hill 2025-07-04

Ukrainian Activists Demand U.K. Cut Energy Ties with Russia-Linked Firm LONDON — Ukrainian campaigners are calling on Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s new government to immediately sever procurement ties with energy suppliers that maintain links to Russian fossil fuels. In a letter sent Wednesday to Cabinet Office Minister Nick Thomas-Symonds, a coalition of Ukrainian and pro-Ukraine advocacy groups denounced the British government's contract with TotalEnergies Gas & Power, the U.K. arm of the French energy conglomerate TotalEnergies, which still imports Russian gas into Europe. The revelations, first reported by POLITICO, show that gas from TotalEnergies powers not only 10 Downing Street but numerous other government buildings across Whitehall. The government’s deal with the firm, reportedly valued at up to £8 billion, has come under intense criticism from Ukrainian campaigners who argue it contradicts the U.K.'s stated position of reducing dependence on Russian energy. The campaigners declared in their letter that such a contract “undermines the U.K.’s public commitment to ending dependence on Putin’s bloody oil and gas.” They continued: “It sets an example which profiteering companies have been only too happy to follow. This in turn has undermined the entire Western sanctions regime.” Although a government spokesperson defended the procurement process, saying, “All government contracts are openly published online, and follow all U.K. sanctions and regulations,” activists remain unconvinced. “Like most U.K. suppliers, TotalEnergies purchases gas from the U.K. domestic open market, where the presence of Russian gas is extremely unlikely,” the spokesperson added. Still, campaigners are demanding transparency and action. Their letter, signed by seven organizations either based in Ukraine or supporting the country from abroad, asks Thomas-Symonds to disclose the full extent of Whitehall’s contracts with TotalEnergies. It also urges him to commit to ending any procurement from firms still tied to Russian energy and to articulate a plan for transitioning to “clean, conflict-free energy sources.” Iryna Ptashnyk, a senior researcher at the Ukrainian group Razom We Stand, which led the campaign, said, “It was indefensible that British taxpayers’ money is flowing to TotalEnergies. The U.K. government must urgently show leadership [and] end these contracts.” While TotalEnergies insists its contracts with European clients involve Russian gas only from the Yamal LNG facility in Siberia — a long-standing agreement it claims it cannot exit — concerns remain high. The company maintains that none of its gas supplied under U.K. contracts is sourced from Russia, and that it complies with the U.K.’s ban on Russian LNG imports. Nevertheless, critics argue that its continued trade in Russian gas elsewhere undermines international sanctions and helps finance the Kremlin’s war effort. The influence of TotalEnergies reaches well beyond Whitehall. According to campaigners, its U.K. subsidiary also supplies gas to NHS hospitals, schools, local councils, and even the Bank of England through a range of public sector contracts. Stephen Hoffman, deputy director of UK Friends of Ukraine, condemned the government’s ongoing relationship with the firm. “British government buildings should not be heated with gas that comes from a company with such deep ties to Russia’s fossil fuel industry,” he said. In response, the government spokesperson emphasized the broader transition strategy, stating, “We are making the U.K. a clean energy superpower to get off the roller coaster of fossil fuel markets controlled by dictators like Putin, replacing that with clean homegrown power we control, and have ended all imports of Russian fossil fuels in response to Russia’s illegal invasion of Ukraine.” Adapted by ASEAN Now from Politico 2025-07-04

UK Government Demands Accountability from BBC over Bob Vylan Glastonbury Broadcast The UK government has intensified pressure on the BBC following its decision to live stream a Glastonbury performance by punk duo Bob Vylan, during which the artists led a chant of "death, death to the IDF [Israel Defence Forces]." Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy told the House of Commons on Thursday that she is “not satisfied” with the BBC’s response and said she “would expect there to be accountability at the highest levels” within the corporation. The BBC has acknowledged the incident, admitting that the comments made during the live set were “utterly unacceptable” and stating it should have cut the broadcast sooner. The performance remained available on iPlayer for over four hours before being removed, drawing sharp criticism from across the political and public spectrum, including from Chief Rabbi Sir Ephraim Mirvis and broadcast regulator Ofcom, which noted the broadcaster had “questions to answer.” In an internal email to the BBC’s Jewish staff network on Tuesday, Director General Tim Davie condemned the incident unequivocally. “I was, and remain, appalled by Bob Vylan's deeply offensive and totally unacceptable behaviour during his Glastonbury set,” he wrote. “That performance had no place on the BBC, and there is absolutely no place for antisemitism at the BBC.” Bob Vylan have since faced serious consequences. Multiple upcoming performances have been cancelled, including shows in Manchester, France, and Germany. Avon and Somerset Police have opened a criminal investigation into their Glastonbury comments, while London’s Metropolitan Police confirmed that the band is also being investigated for remarks allegedly made during a performance at Alexandra Palace in May. New footage shows that Bob Vylan didn’t just chant “Death to the IDF,” he said “Death to every single IDF soldier out there.” This is direct incitement to violence. And includes every single Jewish, Druze, Christian, and Muslim IDF soldier. The culture secretary’s criticism of the BBC did not end with this particular incident. Earlier this week, she referenced what she described as a pattern of “recent editorial failures” at the public broadcaster. Among them is a controversy involving the documentary Gaza: How To Survive A Warzone, which was pulled from iPlayer in February after revelations that it was narrated by the child of a Hamas minister. “When you have one editorial failure, it's something that must be gripped,” Nandy said on Monday. “When you have several, it becomes a problem of leadership.” The BBC is currently conducting a formal review of the Gaza documentary episode and is expected to publish its findings in the near future. Meanwhile, pressure continues to mount on the corporation’s top executives as both government officials and the public demand accountability and clearer editorial standards. Related Topics: BBC in Trouble again BBC Under Fire Again Over Gaza Analyst's Hamas Connections BBC Contributor in Gaza Sparks Outrage ‘We’ll burn Jews like Hitler did’ BBC Doc Features Son Of Hamas Leader but Fails to Disclose to Viewers BBC Faces Backlash Over Use of Term ‘Revert’ in Islam Coverage BBC Faces More Serious Accusations of Bias in Gaza Hostage Release Coverage "Controversy Surrounds BBC Arabic's Coverage of Israel-Gaza Conflict" BBC uses account of journalist working for Iran-backed news agency in Gaza deaths article MPs demand inquiry Gaza doctors at centre of harrowing BBC report are Hamas supporters BBC criticized For failing To Disclose Affiliations of Palestinian Journalists Hamas Ties BBC Faces Backlash Over Terminology in Hamas Coverage BBC Chairman Calls For a Thorough Review of Israel-Hamas War Bias BBC Accused of Bias in Israel-Hamas Coverage: Over 1,500 Breaches of Guidelines Jeremy Bowen Defends BBC Amid Allegations of Bias Over Israel-Hamas Coverage New Report from former BBC Director Criticizes Coverage of Israel-Hamas Conflict Whistleblower Alleges Normalized Anti-Semitism at the BBC Adapted by ASEAN Now from BBC 2025-07-04

//closed// PM me a credible source link to this article with no paywall and it will then be re opened

New topic on the ceasefire deal. Hamas Leaders Ordered to Disarm in Doha Amid Ceasefire Push

Hamas Leaders Ordered to Disarm in Doha Amid Ceasefire Push Hamas officials based in Doha have reportedly been instructed by Qatari mediators to surrender their personal weapons, as part of a renewed international push—led by the United States—to bring an end to the war in Gaza through a ceasefire agreement with Israel. The development comes as Hamas confirmed on Wednesday that it is reviewing a new truce proposal, following comments by President Trump that Israel has already accepted a 60-day suspension of hostilities. The plan includes a provisional release of hostages and the potential for long-term peace negotiations. “We are holding discussions to reach an agreement that will ensure the end of aggressions, the withdrawal of forces and granting aid to the people of Gaza,” Hamas stated. Sources told The Times that top Hamas officials based in Doha, including lead negotiator Khalil al-Hayya and others, were told to hand over their personal firearms. Among them are prominent members of Hamas’s political bureau such as Zaher Jabareen, a founding figure of the group’s military operations in the West Bank, and Muhammad Ismail Darwish, who earlier this year engaged in diplomatic efforts involving Iran and Turkey while commuting between Cairo and Doha for indirect talks with Israel. President Trump, who is expected to meet Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House next week, expressed optimism about the situation, saying he hopes for “at least a temporary ceasefire” to be declared in the coming days. Israel has already agreed to Trump's framework for the ceasefire. On Tuesday, Ron Dermer, an Israeli minister, met with Steve Witkoff, the U.S. president’s envoy to the Middle East. Following the meeting, Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar indicated Israel’s readiness to move forward. “We are serious in our will to reach a hostage deal and a ceasefire. We said yes to US special envoy Witkoff’s proposals. There are some positive signs. I don’t want to say more than that right now. But our goal is to begin proximity talks as soon as possible,” Sa’ar said. According to Israeli estimates, around 50 hostages—both alive and deceased—are still being held by Hamas. Although the exact number of those who would be freed under the proposed agreement is unclear, past discussions have centered on the release of about ten individuals per phase. Despite the mounting pressure on Hamas leadership in Qatar, the ultimate decision to approve any ceasefire still lies with Izz al-Din al-Haddad, the group’s commander in Gaza. While Egypt, backed by other Arab nations, has previously proposed alternatives to Hamas rule in the territory, a 2023 peace framework stopped short of explicitly demanding the group disarm. As efforts intensify in Doha, the disarmament of Hamas’s external political wing is being viewed as both a symbolic and practical gesture to demonstrate their willingness to de-escalate and engage with a broader peace plan. The coming days are expected to be crucial in determining whether this fragile momentum can translate into a sustained end to the bloodshed in Gaza. Adapted by ASEAN Now from The Times 2025-07-04

Post with text block of lyrics that contravened forum rules has been removed along with the replies to it: 8. You will not post vulgarities, obscenities or profanities. @Ralf001 a comment on moderation additionally removed

As the World Watches Iran, Putin Quietly Expands His War Across Ukraine While global attention is fixated on tensions in the Middle East and Iran’s nuclear ambitions, Russian President Vladimir Putin is quietly escalating his military campaign in Ukraine, with signs that his goals now extend far beyond the previously annexed regions. In a striking declaration last week, Putin stated, “All of Ukraine is ours,” during a speech at the St. Petersburg economic forum. He added, “Wherever the Russian soldier treads is ours,” as Russian troops launched a fresh offensive in the Sumy region—an area not included in the four territories Moscow claimed in 2022. This new aggression signals a return to broader war aims, reviving Russia’s initial ambitions of dominating the entire Ukrainian state. On Monday, the Russian military announced that it had captured the final sliver of Luhansk, potentially marking the first full conquest of a Ukrainian region since Crimea was seized in 2014. If confirmed, it would represent a symbolic victory for Putin, but one that appears to serve as a stepping stone toward even greater territorial expansion. Russian state media has claimed that forces have now captured their first village in Dnipropetrovsk—a region that had never before seen ground combat since the war began. Meanwhile, tens of thousands of Russian troops are reportedly amassing around Sumy and Kharkiv in Ukraine’s north, signaling further incursions beyond the initial warfronts. The renewed push comes as peace talks between Moscow and Kyiv have faltered. Two rounds of negotiations in May and June resulted only in limited agreements on prisoner exchanges and repatriations of the dead. Putin now admits that talks are “nowhere close” to a breakthrough, despite previous diplomatic efforts backed by Donald Trump. Analysts say the scale and tempo of Russian military activity reflect a significant shift. “That was a light way to introduce that into the information space. First it’s a buffer zone, it’s just 30km to protect Russians,” said Angelica Evans, a Russia analyst at the Institute for the Study of War, referencing Putin’s comments during a May visit to Kursk. “Then you’re not that far from major regional cities, so why not take those? Because [Putin thinks] ‘isn’t it our right to take those, because they’re historic Russian cities’. It’s slow-rolling what I think we eventually will see … a return to an acknowledgement to take all of Ukraine.” This broader strategy could also explain the recent spike in attacks on civilian areas. In Kyiv, a missile strike killed 18 people in an apartment block, while another 17 were killed on a civilian train in Dnipropetrovsk. “The desire to strike these places has always been there,” Evans said. “A lot of these strikes are about undermining Ukrainian morale and for some of these settlements, that are closer to the frontline, an effort to convince people to leave and to make it easier in the future to seize these places.” The reported seizure of Dachne in Dnipropetrovsk could have grave implications. Ukrainian forces have never had to defend this region before, and military sources warn that its flat terrain and sparse population could allow for rapid Russian advances. Russia’s territorial gains are also accelerating, with ISW data showing that the Russian military captured 240 square kilometers in March, 379 in April, 507 in May, and 588 in June. Russian delegates reportedly warned Ukrainian negotiators during May’s Istanbul talks that Moscow could sustain the war for 21 more years. Kremlin aide Vladimir Medinsky, who led the Russian delegation, threatened that if Ukraine didn’t concede to Putin’s demands, Russia would move to annex Sumy and Kharkiv as well. “Moscow wanted peace but would fight ‘however long it takes’,” Medinsky said. Despite Russian assertions that Western powers are stalling peace efforts, U.S. officials place blame squarely on Moscow. “Russian claims that it is the US and Ukraine stalling peace talks are unfounded,” said Keith Kellogg, Donald Trump’s special envoy for Russia and Ukraine. “President Trump has been consistent and adamant about making progress to end the war. We urge an immediate ceasefire and a move to trilateral talks to end the war. Russia cannot continue to stall for time while it bombs civilian targets in Ukraine.” Adapted by ASEAN Now from The Telegraph 2025-07-03

Trump Unveils Controversial ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ Immigration Facility in Florida Everglades President Donald Trump has toured a newly constructed migrant detention center in the Florida Everglades, which his administration has dubbed “Alligator Alcatraz.” The facility, designed to detain around 3,000 undocumented migrants, is the latest and most controversial element of Trump’s ongoing immigration crackdown. During his visit, Trump claimed the center would soon house “the most menacing migrants, some of the most vicious people on the planet.” The surrounding wilderness, teeming with alligators, crocodiles, and pythons, is expected to act as a natural barrier to prevent escapes. “We’re surrounded by miles of treacherous swampland and the only way out is, really, deportation,” Trump said during the tour. “I wouldn’t want to run through the Everglades for long,” he added, warning that escapees would face “a lot of cops in the form of alligators.” Despite the fanfare from the administration, the project has attracted sharp criticism from environmental groups, local residents, and lawmakers who worry about the ecological impact. “I have serious concerns about the environmental damage,” said Betty Osceola, a member of the Miccosukee Native American community, as she gestured to a nearby canal where an alligator swam. The Everglades, home to endangered species such as the Florida panther and the West Indian manatee, have long been the focus of multibillion-dollar restoration efforts. Elise Pautler Bennett, an attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity, argued that political motives fast-tracked the project. “Any other project that would have been proposed in the Everglades would have gone through an intense environmental approval process. I'm convinced this one didn’t get that because it’s a political stunt,” she said. Trump toured various parts of the compound, including a medical facility and a large, air-conditioned tent divided into cage-like enclosures. The structure, located at the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport about 36 miles from Miami, sits in an ecologically significant subtropical wetland. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis accompanied Trump and told reporters he plans to deputize members of the state’s National Guard Judge Advocate Corps as temporary immigration judges. The goal is to expedite deportation proceedings. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, also present during the visit, echoed that aim, saying, “They can have their hearings, to get due process and then immediately be flown back home to their home countries.” Trump endorsed the governor’s plan and suggested the facility “could be” a model for others across Republican-led states such as Louisiana, where his administration is seeking new sites. Both Trump and Noem said they believe the Everglades facility will serve as a deterrent, prompting many migrants to leave voluntarily. Noem went so far as to claim that “one million have already done so,” though she admitted that the true figure is unknown due to undocumented departures and incomplete data from migrants’ home countries. The center is expected to cost approximately $450 million annually, largely funded through a Federal Emergency Management Agency program originally designated for temporary shelter and services for undocumented immigrants. Despite administration claims that the facility is temporary, many locals fear otherwise. “It’s going to be permanent,” Osceola warned. Critics worry that this project not only risks environmental degradation but also sets a dangerous precedent for how immigration enforcement is conducted in the U.S. The decision to build this center comes as Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) grapples with record-high detention numbers—currently holding around 59,000 individuals, which is 140% over its official capacity, according to data obtained by CBS News. Like its namesake, the now-defunct Alcatraz prison off San Francisco Bay that Trump has expressed interest in reopening, the Everglades facility is remote, isolated, and intentionally difficult to access. Adapted by ASEAN Now from BBC 2025-07-03

Starmer’s Rebellion Problem: Cracks in Labour Could Deepen Fast Sir Keir Starmer may have narrowly sidestepped a humiliating Commons defeat over welfare reform, but the rebellion by 49 Labour MPs this week suggests far more serious trouble could be on the horizon. If political history is any guide, this is not just a bump in the road—it could be the start of a long and painful erosion of party discipline. At first, the scale of the revolt looked even more daunting. Reports suggested up to 120 Labour MPs might vote against the government over proposed disability benefit cuts—numbers that would have outstripped the early rebellions faced by Boris Johnson or Theresa May. In the end, Starmer retreated, scrapping the cuts before they could be voted on. That tactical withdrawal helped reduce the size of the rebellion, but it did little to mask the depth of the discontent. The episode evokes strong parallels with Sir Tony Blair’s own experience in 1997. Just seven months into his first term, Blair faced a rebellion of 47 Labour MPs over benefit changes for lone parents—a not entirely dissimilar controversy. Yet while the numbers are similar, the context is very different. Blair, at the time, enjoyed a net approval rating of +46. Starmer, by contrast, ends his first year in office with a dire approval score of -36. Worse still, Blair’s initial rebellion was a warning of more to come. In 1997, just 5% of Commons votes saw significant revolts of ten or more Labour MPs. But by 2000, that figure more than doubled, and by 2005, it reached 22%, a year marked by major rebellions on everything from terror laws to ID cards and even rail legislation. After a brief lull under Gordon Brown, dissent surged again as Labour’s hold on power slipped away. The Conservative experience offers a slightly different timeline, with internal tensions remaining somewhat managed—until the Brexit crisis of 2019. That year, party discipline effectively collapsed. In a third of all parliamentary votes, ten or more Tory MPs broke ranks—the highest rebellion rate on record. Starmer, like Blair before him, leads a “broad church” of Labour MPs, and history shows what happens when that coalition starts to fracture. The danger is particularly acute when the challenge comes from the left. Survation’s ideological mapping of the party showed a 31-point divide between the Labour Left and Right before the general election. That gap has now widened to 39. Starmer and his allies sit squarely in the centre-left, just like Blair. But the rebellion is building from the leftward edge of the party—and the more that wing feels sidelined, the bolder it may become. The Prime Minister’s challenge is not only internal. Voter opinion also paints a complicated picture. A recent poll revealed that a third of Labour voters in 2024 supported the proposed cuts to disability benefits that Starmer has now abandoned. Around 20% were unsure. That third who supported the plan could prove crucial at the next election. If disillusioned, they might not return to the Tories—but they could drift towards Reform UK, fracturing Labour’s fragile coalition of support. What this week’s events make clear is that Starmer’s struggle is not over—it may only just be beginning. If Labour’s internal divisions deepen and the public grows more uncertain of his leadership, Starmer could find himself fighting on two fronts: against his opponents, and against his own party. Just like Blair learned two decades ago, once the cracks start to show, holding everything together becomes exponentially harder. Adapted by ASEAN Now from The Telegraph 2025-07-03

The University of Pennsylvania has agreed to bar transgender athletes from competing in women’s sports after a federal investigation sparked by the participation of former swimmer Lia Thomas. The decision comes as part of a resolution with the U.S. Department of Education, which required the Ivy League school to both apologise and correct athletic records that were “misappropriated by male athletes.” In a statement announcing the agreement, the department confirmed that UPenn must revise records from the 2021–22 season “to indicate who would now hold the records under current eligibility guidelines.” The university has not yet clarified whether the records held by Thomas—who became the first openly transgender athlete to win an NCAA Division I title in 2022—will be deleted entirely. Thomas' presence in collegiate swimming reignited a national debate over transgender inclusion in sports, especially following her dominant performances for UPenn’s women’s swim team after competing on the men’s team for three years. The university now says it will adopt “biology-based definitions” of male and female, a shift required under a recent executive order signed by President Donald Trump shortly after returning to office. “Today’s resolution agreement with UPenn is yet another example of the Trump effect in action,” said U.S. Education Secretary Linda McMahon. “Thanks to the leadership of President Trump, UPenn has agreed both to apologize for its past Title IX violations and to ensure that women’s sports are protected at the university for future generations of female athletes.” The Department of Education had previously launched several Title IX-related investigations into universities’ transgender policies, with UPenn among the most high-profile cases. Title IX is a 1972 federal law that prohibits sex-based discrimination in federally funded educational programs. Two months after initiating the investigation, the Trump administration temporarily withheld $175 million in federal funds from the university, citing its transgender athletics policy as the reason. UPenn defended its past policies by pointing out that they aligned with NCAA eligibility standards at the time. “We acknowledge that some student-athletes were disadvantaged by these rules,” the university said in a statement. “We recognize this and will apologize to those who experienced a competitive disadvantage or experienced anxiety because of the policies in effect at the time.” Thomas began hormone therapy in 2019 before switching to compete on the women’s team, where she broke multiple school records and posted the fastest times for any female swimmer in the NCAA. She has since graduated and is no longer affiliated with the university’s athletics program. Despite the controversy, Thomas previously stressed that her decision to transition was deeply personal, not competitive. “The biggest misconception, I think, is the reason I transitioned,” she told ABC and ESPN in 2022. “People will say, ‘Oh, she just transitioned so she would have an advantage, so she could win.’ I transitioned to be happy, to be true to myself.” Last year, Thomas challenged World Aquatics’ ban on transgender women competing if they experienced any part of male puberty, but the Court of Arbitration for Sport in Switzerland dismissed her case. The Human Rights Campaign, a prominent LGBTQ+ advocacy group, condemned the agreement. “The American people deserve a White House that is laser focused on making sure every student thrives,” said spokesman Brandon Wolf. “Instead, this administration is obsessed with making young people’s lives harder and scapegoating transgender people so they can attack independent institutions.” Adapted by ASEAN Now from NYP 2025-07-03

Paramount and CBS Reach Eight-Figure Settlement with Trump, Agree to Editorial Changes Paramount Global and CBS have agreed to a major settlement with President Donald Trump, resolving a high-profile election interference lawsuit that centered around a controversial “60 Minutes” interview with then-Vice President Kamala Harris. The settlement, which includes an upfront payment of $16 million to Trump, may ultimately exceed $30 million when factoring in future allocations. According to sources familiar with the agreement, part of the settlement includes additional commitments by the network for future conservative-leaning content, such as advertisements or public service announcements. Fox News Digital reported that this mid-eight-figure allocation would support conservative causes, though Paramount leadership has reportedly disputed the characterization of these additional expenditures. CBS has also agreed to implement a significant change in its editorial standards, requiring the prompt release of full, unedited transcripts of all interviews with future presidential candidates. Those involved in the negotiations have referred to this new editorial protocol as the “Trump Rule.” “With this record settlement, President Donald J. Trump delivers another win for the American people as he, once again, holds the Fake News media accountable for their wrongdoing and deceit,” a spokesperson for Trump’s legal team told Fox News Digital. “CBS and Paramount Global realized the strength of this historic case and had no choice but to settle. President Trump will always ensure that no one gets away with lying to the American People as he continues on his singular mission to Make America Great Again.” Trump originally filed a $20 billion lawsuit against CBS, accusing the network of manipulating public perception through selective editing of Harris’ responses during a 2023 “60 Minutes” interview. In the disputed broadcast, correspondent Bill Whitaker asked Harris why Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu wasn’t “listening” to the Biden administration. A preview clip aired on CBS’ “Face the Nation” showed Harris giving what critics called a rambling “word salad” response. Later, however, during a primetime special, the network aired a more composed and articulate reply to the same question. Critics accused CBS of selectively editing Harris’ full answer in a way that protected her image just before the 2024 election. The raw footage and full transcript, released earlier this year by the FCC, revealed both clips came from the same response — with CBS airing only different segments at different times. Despite agreeing to the settlement, CBS has denied any journalistic misconduct. “The settlement will include a release of all claims regarding any CBS reporting through the date of the settlement, including the Texas action and the threatened defamation action,” Paramount said in a statement. The case proceeded to mediation, where both sides sought resolution, especially as Paramount Global prepared for a major merger with Skydance Media. Analysts speculated that Paramount’s controlling shareholder, Shari Redstone, pushed for a swift resolution to avoid potential delays or retaliation from the FCC, which is led by Trump-appointed officials and holds authority over the pending merger. In an earlier post on Truth Social, Trump declared the case a sure win, writing: “They cheated and defrauded the American People at levels never seen before in the Political Arena. Kamala Harris, during Early Voting and, immediately before Election Day, was asked a question, and gave an answer, that was so bad and incompetent that it would have cost her many of the Votes that she ended up getting.” CBS’ long-time “60 Minutes” correspondent Scott Pelley had previously warned that any settlement in the case could be “very damaging to CBS, to Paramount, to the reputation of those companies.” While the settlement ends the legal dispute, it leaves a significant mark on media policy and underscores Trump’s continued campaign against what he has repeatedly labeled “Fake News.” ABC also settled a defamation lawsuit in December with then-President-elect Trump for $15 million, after anchor George Stephanopoulos repeatedly and incorrectly asserted Trump had been found “liable for rape” in a civil trial last year. Adapted by ASEAN Now from NYP 2025-07-03

U.S. Slows Missile Deliveries to Ukraine Over Concerns About Domestic Stockpiles The United States has halted certain shipments of air defense missiles and precision-guided munitions to Ukraine due to growing concerns over depleted domestic stockpiles, according to two individuals familiar with the matter. The decision marks a notable shift in the Pentagon’s logistical support for Kyiv, coming at a time when Ukraine is struggling to repel intensified Russian offensives across its southeastern front. The suspension of some weapons deliveries, including critical air defense interceptors designed to destroy incoming Russian missiles and drones, took place in recent days, the sources confirmed. While the Pentagon declined to comment officially on the matter, the individuals indicated the move reflects an internal reassessment of the U.S. military's own preparedness amid global tensions and ongoing conflicts. “There’s a real concern about how much is left in our own inventory,” said one of the sources, emphasizing that the slowdown is a precaution rather than a complete freeze of all support. The missile systems in question play a crucial role in shielding Ukrainian cities and military infrastructure from Russian aerial assaults, which have surged in recent weeks. Russia currently occupies roughly one-fifth of Ukrainian territory and continues to press forward. Ukrainian defenses are being tested on multiple fronts, particularly in the southeastern regions of Donetsk and Dnipropetrovsk, where Moscow has reportedly gained ground. At the same time, Russia has escalated its air campaign across Ukraine, targeting civilian and military sites alike. This latest pause in aid deliveries is not the first disruption to U.S. weapons support. Back in February, all military aid was temporarily suspended, followed by another, longer hiatus in March. While these suspensions were tied to funding disputes and legislative delays under the Biden administration, the current slowdown is tied more directly to concerns about national readiness. Though President Donald Trump’s administration has resumed shipments of previously approved aid, no new arms transfer policies have been announced. This leaves Ukraine in a vulnerable position, relying on pre-authorized supplies at a moment when their strategic need is arguably at its highest. The halt was first reported by Politico on Tuesday afternoon, further highlighting the uncertainty surrounding U.S. commitment to Ukraine’s military resistance in the months ahead. With political divisions at home and growing caution within the Pentagon about America’s own defense capabilities, the future of continued, large-scale arms support for Ukraine remains unclear. As the battlefield situation evolves and Russia presses its advantage, Ukrainian officials are likely to push for reassurances and fresh commitments from their Western allies. For now, however, the flow of critical U.S. weapons—particularly those designed to counter aerial threats—is slowing at a crucial time. Adapted by ASEAN Now from Reuters 2025-07-03

Australia Bans Kanye West Over Anti-Semitic Song Praising Hitler Australia has officially revoked Kanye West's tourist visa, banning the controversial rapper from entering the country following the release of a song that glorifies Adolf Hitler. The decision, confirmed by Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke, comes amid growing concern over West’s pattern of anti-Semitic rhetoric and his latest track, titled Heil Hitler, which was released in May. “You're going to have a song and promote that sort of Nazism -- we don't need that in Australia," Burke said on Wednesday. He explained that although West, who now goes by the legal name Ye, had previously traveled to the country without issue, the nature of his latest music forced officials to reconsider. “He’s been coming to Australia for a long time and he’s made a lot of offensive comments,” Burke added. “But my officials looked at it again once he released the Heil Hitler song and he no longer has a valid visa in Australia.” Ye had obtained a tourist visa that could have allowed him to stay in Australia for up to 12 months. However, sources inside the government confirmed to News.com.au that the visa was recently cancelled and that the decision had been formally communicated to him. The ban also impacts West's ability to travel with his Australian-born wife Bianca Censori, who grew up in Melbourne. While she was back in Australia earlier this year, West remained in Japan amid reports of tensions in their relationship. Now, the couple will not be able to visit Australia together due to the government's ruling. “This wasn’t a visa for the purpose of concerts. It was a lower-level visa, and the officials still looked at the law and said, ‘You’re going to have a song and promote that sort of Nazism?’ We don’t need that in Australia,” Burke told ABC TV. Asked whether the ban was sustainable considering West’s global fame, Burke didn’t hesitate. “I think that what’s not sustainable is to import hatred,” he said. “Some people say, oh, don’t you believe in freedom of speech? And for Australian citizens, yeah, you’ve got full freedom of speech. But we have enough problems in this country already without deliberately importing bigotry.” This isn’t the first time Australia has threatened to deny West entry over his inflammatory statements. In the past, government officials expressed concern following his interview with far-right conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, in which he openly praised Hitler. But the release of Heil Hitler appears to have been the breaking point. Ye, the ex-husband of Kim Kardashian, shares four children with her: North, Saint, Chicago, and Psalm. Despite his longstanding fame and previous visits to Australia, the government has made clear that celebrity status will not shield anyone from consequences if their actions violate national standards. In Minister Burke’s words, “We don’t need to bring that kind of hatred here.” Adapted by ASEAN Now from News.Au 2025-07-03

Landmark Inquiry Concludes British Committed Genocide Against Indigenous Australians in Victoria A historic Aboriginal-led investigation has concluded that British colonists committed genocide against Indigenous Australians in the state of Victoria. The Yoorrook Justice Commission, established in 2021 as Australia's first formal truth-telling inquiry, released a damning report revealing that colonisation brought about the near-destruction of Aboriginal communities through violence, disease, and systemic abuse. The Commission found that the Indigenous population of Victoria plummeted by 75% within just two decades of British settlement in the early 1830s. By 1851, the number of Indigenous people had dropped from 60,000 to just 15,000. The report stated unequivocally, “This was genocide.” Drawing on more than 1,300 submissions and over two months of public hearings, the Commission documented a harrowing history of atrocities including mass killings, disease, sexual violence, forced exclusion, child removals, cultural erasure, linguicide, and environmental destruction. It called for comprehensive “redress” to acknowledge and address these extensive human rights violations, including potential reparations. “This report shines a light on hard truths,” said Victoria Premier Jacinta Allan, whose Labor government promised to “carefully consider” the findings and recommendations. Among the 100 recommendations made were sweeping reforms to the education system, increased support for Indigenous-led health services, and formal apologies for injustices, such as the exclusion of Aboriginal soldiers from post-war land grant programs. Racism in the state’s health system was described as “endemic” by the Commission, which urged greater investment in Indigenous healthcare and stronger policies to recruit and retain Aboriginal staff. Jill Gallagher, head of Victoria’s leading Aboriginal health organisation, said the Commission's finding of genocide was “indisputable.” Speaking to the ABC, she said, “We don't blame anyone alive today for these atrocities, but it is the responsibility of those of us alive today to accept that truth — and all Victorians today must accept, recognise and reconcile with these factual findings.” Notably, three of the Commission’s five members — Sue-Anne Hunter, Maggie Walter, and Anthony North — did not approve of the inclusion of unspecified “key findings” in the final report. No additional explanation was given regarding their objections. Despite this, the report stands as a landmark in Australia’s ongoing reckoning with its colonial past. It forms part of a broader national movement toward reconciliation, which includes treaty processes and efforts to amplify Indigenous voices in political decision-making. However, progress has been uneven across the country. While similar truth-telling commissions are underway in other states and territories, some have stalled or been abandoned. In Queensland, for instance, a truth inquiry was scrapped following the election of a new Liberal-National government, replacing Labor. Nationally, the question of how to meaningfully recognise First Nations peoples remains highly contested. In October 2023, Australians voted down a proposed constitutional amendment to establish the Voice to Parliament — a national Indigenous advisory body — in a divisive referendum that left many Aboriginal leaders disheartened. The Yoorrook Justice Commission’s findings underscore the urgent need to confront uncomfortable truths about the foundations of modern Australia. While the inquiry focused solely on Victoria, its implications are national, challenging all Australians to engage in a process of truth, recognition, and ultimately reconciliation. Adapted by ASEAN Now from BBC 2025-07-03

Thread clean up, numerous off topic posts removed unrelated to the OP which is an editorial opinion piece.