Social Media

A rambling post full of false claims and misinformation along with a baiting post asking the same question once it had already been answered has been removed @Jeff the Chef

Undercover Sting Foils Rolex Robbers in Mayfair as Gang Targets Police by Mistake A group of so-called "Rolex rippers" were dramatically arrested in London’s Mayfair after they mistakenly targeted a pair of undercover police officers posing as a wealthy couple. The incident, which unfolded on October 10, 2024, was caught on CCTV and has since been revealed as part of a wider operation to tackle a spate of high-end watch robberies in the capital. The plainclothes officers, referred to only as A and B, were strategically placed in Berkeley Square wearing designer clothing and accessories, including replica luxury watches, to attract and catch criminals in the act. As they walked through the square, 21-year-old Yakob Harket pounced, ripping a fake Patek Philippe Rose Gold watch from the female officer’s wrist. Although the watch was dropped and quickly recovered, the attempt triggered an immediate and coordinated response from other nearby officers. One officer, dressed in a suit, slipped while attempting to detain Harket, who momentarily escaped, but he was soon arrested. Two of his accomplices were caught at the scene, while others fled. Harket later admitted to robbery at Southwark Crown Court. His accomplice, 34-year-old Mohammed Naas, denied the charges but was convicted of robbery by a jury after a three-day trial. Two additional gang members, Yanis Amri, 37, and Adel Mohamdi, 31, were found guilty in their absence after fleeing prior to the court proceedings. Warrants have now been issued for their arrests. During the trial, prosecutor Henry Laidlaw explained, “The undercover officers, referred to as A and B, were tasked with walking around while posing as a wealthy couple. He [Harket] ripped the Patek Philippe watch off her wrist but dropped it, so it was recovered.” He added, “You will have seen there, there were a large number of plain clothes officers who sprang into action. Mohamadi and Naas were arrested right next to the offence.” Footage presented in court showed the officers being followed from Berkeley Square to Hays Mews by the suspects. Naas, in his defence, claimed he had woken up at a friend’s house on Edgware Road, had lunch, and later went to Tottenham Court Road to buy cigarettes. He alleged that he had only bumped into Mohamdi and that they had ended up in Shepherd’s Market after meeting for coffee. “Mr Naas said the robbery happened right in front of him. He said he knew Harket but they had never had a conversation,” said Laidlaw. However, the prosecution revealed that Naas had been in regular contact with Harket in the months leading up to the robbery. Laidlaw told jurors, “The prosecution's case, as evidenced by the phone, is he knew Harket well and had a lot of communication in the months leading up to the robbery. Phones were downloaded and a number of internet searches had been made by Naas on 9 October for Richard Mille watches.” He concluded, “Mr Naas did exactly what he was required to do, make sure they were under observation at all times. It is the prosecution's case that Naas was an essential cog in a machine and played a knowing and willing part in the robbery.” Sentencing for Harket has been adjourned until June 2, 2024, while the hunt continues for Mohamdi and Amri. In a separate case earlier this week, 28-year-old Algerian national Anis Benemri was jailed for 32 months after he robbed tourist Karl Christian Septien of his £250,000 “Bubba Watson” watch in front of his children outside the Novikov Restaurant on Berkeley Street. A Metropolitan Police spokesperson commented, “Tackling violent crime is one of the Met's priorities and we are determined to reduce the number of robberies. Uniform and plain clothes officers proactively patrol robbery hotspots to identify offences taking place, but more importantly to help prevent and deter offenders from committing robberies in the first place.” Based on a report by The Daily Mail 2025-04-18

Israel Vows to Keep Troops in Security Zones Across Gaza, Lebanon, and Syria Israeli troops will remain stationed indefinitely in security buffer zones across Gaza, Lebanon, and Syria, according to Israel's Defence Minister, Israel Katz. His remarks mark a clear shift in Israel's long-term military strategy amid ongoing regional tensions. Katz stated that Israeli forces "will remain in the security zones as a buffer between the enemy and [Israeli] communities in any temporary or permanent situation in Gaza - as in Lebanon and Syria." The declaration confirms Israel's intention to maintain its military footprint beyond the recent hostilities, regardless of whether a lasting peace agreement is achieved. Over the past several weeks, Israeli forces have intensified operations in Gaza, capturing more than half of the territory in an effort to pressure Hamas into releasing hostages. This renewed military campaign followed the collapse of a temporary ceasefire. Currently, 59 hostages remain in Gaza, with 24 believed to be alive. Many others were released during earlier ceasefire arrangements or through negotiated deals. Katz emphasized a shift in Israel's military doctrine, saying "unlike in the past" the Israeli Defence Forces are "not evacuating areas that have been cleared and seized." This reflects a strategic decision to hold territory indefinitely, aimed at preventing future attacks and ensuring greater security for Israeli civilians. Israel has adopted a similar approach in Lebanon, where it continues to occupy select areas despite a truce reached with Hezbollah last year. The continued presence of Israeli troops has drawn criticism from Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, who said Israel's actions are "hindering" the Lebanese army’s ability to fully deploy in accordance with the ceasefire terms negotiated between the two sides. A comparable security buffer has also been established in southern Syria, where Israeli forces moved in following the ousting of President Bashar al-Assad’s regime in December. Israel maintains that its control of these strategic zones is essential to safeguarding its northern borders from hostile activity. Israel argues that such measures are necessary to prevent a recurrence of the devastating October 7, 2023, attack, in which militants crossed into southern Israel, killing 1,200 people, most of them civilians, and kidnapping around 250. That incident served as the catalyst for the current conflict and continues to shape Israeli military policy. Katz’s announcement underscores Israel's commitment to a defensive posture rooted in territorial control, signaling that these buffer zones are likely to remain a permanent feature of the regional landscape. Based on a report by Sky News 2025-04-18

Kremlin Spy Chief Warns of ‘Preemptive’ Moves Against NATO Amid Rising Tensions Russia and Belarus are preparing to take preemptive action against NATO countries, according to the head of Russia’s foreign intelligence service, who accused European powers of dangerously escalating the war in Ukraine. Sergei Naryshkin, the chief of Russia’s SVR intelligence agency and a former KGB officer, made the provocative claim during talks in Minsk with Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko. "We feel and see that European countries, especially France, Britain and Germany, are increasing the level of escalation around the Ukrainian conflict, so we need to act preemptively. We are ready for this," said Naryshkin. He did not offer specific evidence for what he described as increased NATO military activity near Russian and Belarusian borders. Belarus remains Moscow’s closest ally in Europe and has already served as a launchpad for Russian attacks on Ukraine. The Kremlin has also deployed tactical nuclear weapons within Belarus, further solidifying their strategic military alliance. Naryshkin’s comments come amid growing Western concern over a shadow war believed to be waged by Russian and Belarusian operatives across Europe. Western intelligence officials say agents from both nations have been linked to numerous acts of sabotage and arson since President Vladimir Putin launched the invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Sir Richard Moore, head of Britain’s foreign intelligence service, described Russia’s sabotage campaign as “staggeringly reckless.” Targets have included cargo planes, commercial warehouses, retail shops, and even critical infrastructure like underwater cables. Russian intelligence agencies are also said to be behind cyberattacks and electronic interference efforts aimed at destabilizing European governments and eroding support for Ukraine. According to a recent analysis by the Center for Strategic and International Studies, the number of Russian sabotage attempts nearly tripled between 2023 and 2024, after having already quadrupled from the previous year. “Despite the increase in Russian attacks, western countries have not developed an effective strategy to counter these attacks,” the report warned. It also noted that acts of sabotage allow the Kremlin to engage in coercive actions that fall below the threshold of open warfare—minimizing the risk of direct military retaliation. While the GRU, Russia’s military intelligence service, is believed to lead these operations, the SVR and the FSB—Russia’s domestic security service previously headed by Putin—are also implicated. However, not all attacks have been conducted by Russian nationals. In the UK, a 20-year-old British man admitted to setting fire to a Ukrainian-owned business in East London on Moscow’s behalf. Earlier this month, a Romanian man was arrested in connection with a blaze at a DHL facility in Birmingham, believed to be caused by a Russian-made incendiary device. In Lithuania, a 17-year-old Ukrainian refugee, Daniil Bardadim, was charged with terrorism after allegedly setting fire to an Ikea store in Vilnius. Authorities claim he was promised a BMW and approximately $11,000 for the act. It remains unclear whether Bardadim was aware that he may have been acting under Moscow’s influence. Interestingly, no such sabotage attacks have been reported in Hungary or Serbia—two of Russia’s most reliable European allies aside from Belarus. This pattern has raised further suspicions about the Kremlin’s selective strategy in targeting only those nations firmly aligned with NATO. Naryshkin’s latest statements underscore a growing sense of confrontation between Russia, its allies, and Western powers. As rhetoric and covert operations escalate, the line between hybrid warfare and open conflict continues to blur—leaving Europe facing an increasingly volatile and uncertain security landscape. Based on a report by The Times 2025-04-18

When Diversity Becomes Discrimination: The Hidden Cost of Identity Quotas in British Institutions The push for diversity in Britain’s public sector has reached a critical tipping point, with accusations that anti-white racism has become just as embedded as trans rights advocacy. In the pursuit of inclusion, vital institutions like the NHS, the police, and the Armed Forces are accused of abandoning merit in favour of identity—at great cost to efficiency, safety, and public trust. A hospital consultant, Amir, shared his dismay about diversity-based hiring practices in the NHS. According to him, British-trained doctors and nurses are increasingly passed over in favour of less qualified overseas candidates, simply to meet diversity quotas. He reflects on how difficult it was to gain entry into medical school in India 25 years ago, saying, “Indian doctors were the best of the best.” But today, he claims, places can be bought. “Everything has a price tag,” he explains. “Not just undergraduate degrees; postgraduate degrees as well.” When Amir was asked for his reaction to reports that NHS trusts were rigging interview shortlists to favour ethnic minority candidates, he replied with unfiltered frustration: “Utter despair, total disaster. Driven by woke managers, consultants have no input into the selection process. Command of the English language no longer a prerequisite.” That statement alone should alarm anyone who values patient safety. The road to becoming a doctor in the UK is long and grueling. Students must earn top A-level grades and endure years of rigorous training. Yet, some of the best are finding that their hard-earned qualifications aren’t enough—especially if they are white or privately educated. The result? Highly trained British doctors are heading abroad, with countries like Australia benefiting from our loss. Medical negligence claims against the NHS reached a staggering £2.8 billion in 2023–24, up £180 million from the previous year. In this context, hiring the best candidates should be an obvious priority. But the influence of “race-based hiring policies” seems to trump all else, driven by what some call a performative DEI culture. Amir notes that “ignorance and incompetence need be no drawback for candidates who have the correct ethnicity.” A friend in finance jokes that her own children—well-educated and white—would be last in line for graduate training roles. Her most recent intern, she admits, was appallingly unfit for client-facing work, but ticked the right boxes for inclusion. Meanwhile, a police recruitment process left one gifted young woman so disillusioned by its focus on diversity that she quit before she even got started. These policies aren’t limited to hospitals and offices. The RAF’s diversity initiative famously backfired when it couldn’t find enough capable pilots and had to recall previously rejected applicants—many of them white men. A recent Army advert showed a Muslim soldier praying during manoeuvres, while others looked on approvingly. “I thought it was a spoof at first,” the writer remarks, questioning whether this image might deter those who simply want to serve their country. Tracy Brabin, Mayor of West Yorkshire, recently dismissed reports that white applicants had been blocked from applying to the police, calling them “incredibly misleading.” Yet in 2023, Chief Constable John Robins supported positive discrimination, stating that candidates from under-represented groups should “move forward” ahead of their white counterparts. The rationale? “Systemic issues around applications.” For critics, this isn’t just misguided policy—it’s dangerous. Discriminating against white candidates in roles that involve life-and-death responsibilities, like medicine or national security, could be seen as treasonous. Yet, HR departments across the UK are allegedly empowered by the Equality Act 2010 to apply “positive action,” with devastating results. As one former senior police officer described the policy: “idiotic.” This madness, as Amir describes it, ultimately demoralizes white British candidates and insults capable minority professionals who earned their place on merit. While he praises some “top of the class” radiologists from India, he remains uneasy about others who secured places via family wealth. The silence surrounding these policies is eerily similar to the way trans rights activism spread, where objecting became taboo. Even as Health Secretary Wes Streeting criticized “misguided” DEI programs that promoted “anti-whiteness,” the NHS continues to endorse strategies like the Rooney Rule—imported from American football—where ethnic minorities must be shortlisted for interviews regardless of qualifications. The ultimate question is not whether diversity should be celebrated—it should. But when inclusion becomes exclusion, when merit is sacrificed at the altar of identity, everyone pays the price. As the article wryly concludes, “I don’t fancy Crispin Good-Chap’s chances if he’s up against a non-binary, blue-haired person who identifies as a brain surgeon, do you?” Based on a report by The Telegraph 2025-04-18

Jordan Uncovers Muslim Brotherhood Cell Plotting Rocket and Drone Attacks Jordanian authorities announced Tuesday the arrest of 16 individuals linked to the Muslim Brotherhood who allegedly plotted a series of attacks using rockets and drones within the kingdom. The suspects were reportedly trained and financed in Lebanon, and security forces had been tracking their activities since 2021. According to a Jordanian security source, the head of the cell was based in Lebanon and trained several members of the group. The Muslim Brotherhood, a long-standing opposition group in Jordan, is known for its affiliation with Hamas, a designated terrorist organization by multiple countries. Authorities say that at least one rocket was ready for launch when the operation was dismantled. The plot comes amid heightened tensions in Jordan fueled by the war in Gaza, which erupted following the October 7, 2023, Hamas-led attack on southern Israel that killed approximately 1,200 people and resulted in 251 hostages being taken. Jordan, a US-backed kingdom with a sizable Palestinian population, has seen waves of anti-government protests allegedly incited by both Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood during the ongoing conflict. In a public statement, Jordan’s General Intelligence Department said it uncovered a rocket manufacturing facility along with a drone production workshop. These were part of “the plot aimed at harming national security, sowing chaos and causing material destruction inside the kingdom.” Jordanian officials also released a video showing the suspects’ confessions and confirmed that the individuals have been referred to the state security court for prosecution. Government spokesman Mohammad Momani detailed that rockets were discovered in a secret location on the outskirts of Amman. These weapons, which were being locally produced, had an estimated range of three to five kilometers and were intended for attacks within Jordan’s borders. A security source revealed that authorities discovered dozens of rockets in the hideout, indicating the scale of the planned assault. Amer Al Sabaileh, a leading security analyst, told Reuters that the plan represented a notable evolution in tactics. “This means a complete change in the way the Muslim Brotherhood are dealing with Jordan and targeting its security,” Al Sabaileh explained. Jordan has historically been considered one of the more stable countries in the region. However, it has had its share of threats to national security. The kingdom expelled Hamas in 1999 and has regularly cracked down on activities it deems as destabilizing. In May of the previous year, Jordanian authorities reported intercepting an arms shipment from Iran—Hamas’s chief supporter—en route through Syria to the Muslim Brotherhood in Jordan. While Jordan maintains internal stability, the foiled plot is a stark reminder of the external and internal pressures the kingdom faces in an increasingly volatile region. Based on a report by Reuters 2025-04-18

George Clooney Says Speaking Out Against Biden’s 2024 Campaign Was His Duty, Not a Bold Move Oscar-winning actor and longtime Democratic supporter George Clooney has opened up about his controversial call for President Joe Biden to step aside from the 2024 presidential race, saying he felt it was his “civic duty” to speak out, even if it wasn’t popular. “Well, I don’t know if it was brave,” Clooney said during an interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper on Wednesday, reflecting on the op-ed he penned for The New York Times in July 2024. “It was a civic duty.” Clooney acknowledged that some people remain upset with him for publishing the piece, but he stands by his decision. The actor revealed that what compelled him to write the op-ed was witnessing fellow Democrats remain silent or dishonest about Biden’s evident decline in both physical and mental sharpness. Clooney described the version of Biden he met during a June fundraiser as markedly different from the man he had known during previous years. “When I saw people on my side of the street, not telling the truth, I thought that was time,” he said. Clooney, 63, co-hosted a major fundraiser for Biden just weeks before the op-ed was published, helping raise around $30 million. However, the event reportedly became a turning point for him. Biden froze up on stage and had to be guided off by former President Barack Obama, an incident that Clooney alluded to in his writing. “[T]he one battle he cannot win is the fight against time,” Clooney wrote in the op-ed. “None of us can.” He didn’t hold back in describing the stark change he saw in the president. “It’s devastating to say it, but the Joe Biden I was with three weeks ago at the fund-raiser was not the Joe ‘big F-ing deal’ Biden of 2010,” he wrote. “He wasn’t even the Joe Biden of 2020. He was the same man we all witnessed at the debate.” The op-ed directly addressed the Democratic Party’s attempts to downplay Biden’s lackluster performance at the June 27, 2024 debate against Donald Trump, calling on lawmakers and party leaders to stop pretending otherwise. “Stop telling us that 51 million people didn’t see what we just saw,” Clooney demanded. “We are not going to win in November with this president.” Though the Biden campaign reportedly tried to dissuade Clooney from publishing the piece, it went live — and just weeks later, on July 21, 2024, Biden officially ended his re-election campaign. When Tapper asked if he was still facing backlash for the op-ed, Clooney admitted, “Some people, sure. It’s okay.” He defended his right to speak out, regardless of how it was received. “You know, listen, the idea of freedom of speech, you know, the specific idea of it is, you know – you can’t demand freedom of speech and then say, but don’t say bad things about me,” Clooney said. “Well, that’s the deal.” “You have to take a stand if you believe in it, take a stance, stand for it, and then deal with the consequences. That’s the rules.” Based on a report by NYP 2025-04-18

Driver Survives 40ft Plunge from Unfinished Bridge After Following Google Maps A 61-year-old man in Indonesia miraculously survived a dramatic plunge off an unfinished overpass after following confusing directions from Google Maps, leading to a terrifying fall captured on CCTV. Rudie Heru Komandono was behind the wheel when his car veered past a concrete security barrier and sped off the edge of a half-built flyover in East Java on April 9. The vehicle dropped nearly 40 feet before crashing onto a busy three-lane highway below, narrowly avoiding oncoming traffic. Surveillance footage shows the shocking moment the car sailed through the air and landed with a violent impact in the middle of the road, scattering debris as startled drivers nearby swerved to avoid a pile-up. Komandono later explained to the press that he had been relying on Google Maps for navigation at the time. According to reports, the app had attempted to re-route him away from the unfinished bridge, but a series of rapidly changing directions left him disoriented. “The road suddenly became dark and there were no other cars,” Komandono recalled. “Then I realised there was a problem when the car started falling and crashed on the ground.” Astonishingly, both Komandono and his passenger, 47-year-old Endang Sri Wahyuni, escaped the wreck with only minor injuries. However, the experience has clearly shaken Wahyuni, who told reporters that she has no plans to ride in a car with Komandono again. The incident has sparked renewed scrutiny of digital navigation apps and their reliability in rapidly developing or less clearly mapped areas, particularly in regions where construction zones may not be clearly marked. Despite the app reportedly trying to reroute the vehicle, the driver’s moment of confusion proved nearly fatal. Local authorities are investigating the circumstances around the incident, and questions remain about whether clearer signage or physical barriers could have prevented the accident. Meanwhile, Komandono is recovering from his injuries and likely reflecting on a night that could have ended very differently. Based on a report by The Independent 2025-04-18

What began as a traffic stop turned into a deadly and dramatic confrontation involving DeShawn Leeth, a man once hailed as a community advocate who was ultimately gunned down after a violent series of events. Leeth, 30, who had previously served time for home invasions but later founded a youth nonprofit, was fatally shot after stealing a police vehicle and leading officers on a high-speed chase across state lines. According to law enforcement, the chaos unfolded on Friday when Ohio State Troopers responded to a vehicle crash. When they approached Leeth, the situation escalated rapidly. Bodycam footage obtained by CBS shows Leeth aggressively confronting the trooper. “Next time you touch me, you gonna die, next time you touch me, you gonna die,” Leeth can be heard shouting repeatedly. The officer attempted to subdue Leeth with a stun gun, but it failed. A struggle ensued, with Leeth delivering blows and ultimately overpowering the trooper. During the altercation, he was heard growling, “I’m stronger than you!” as he forced the officer to the ground. The bodycam was knocked off in the scuffle, and a bystander intervened, urging Leeth to release the trooper. Once free, Leeth jumped into the trooper’s cruiser and took off down the Ohio Turnpike. The subsequent 11-minute chase was captured by the stolen vehicle’s dash cam. Leeth drove erratically, weaving between cars at dangerously high speeds. Throughout the pursuit, he muttered to himself, declaring he “rebuked” anyone in front of or behind him. Pennsylvania State Police eventually intercepted him in North Sewickley Township. Using a tactical maneuver, they struck the stolen cruiser, causing it to spin out of control, hit the median, and crash down an embankment. The vehicle flipped multiple times before coming to rest on its roof. Amazingly, Leeth survived the crash and was pulled from the wreck by troopers. But the situation took another violent turn as Leeth once again lashed out, attempting to fight the officers trying to help him. It was at that moment that law enforcement opened fire, killing him on the scene. Leeth’s death marks a grim end to what some saw as a story of redemption. At 18, he was incarcerated for his role in two home invasions. Years later, he became involved in a faith-based rehabilitation group while in prison and went on to found Underdawg Nation, a nonprofit focused on steering young people away from crime. His efforts gained recognition within his community, where he was seen as a positive force trying to inspire change. In the wake of his death, a GoFundMe campaign created by his family has raised nearly $13,000. The fundraiser described Leeth as someone who “lived to inspire change.” It added, “He was a pillar of hope, a champion for the overlooked, and a beacon of unwavering faith. He lived to uplift others, to pour into his community, and to reflect God’s love in everything he did.” Based on a report by The Daily Mail 2025-04-18

Letitia James Hosts High-Dollar Fundraiser Amid Federal Scrutiny Over Property Claims New York Attorney General Letitia James is pushing forward with her 2026 re-election campaign by launching a high-profile fundraiser, despite facing serious allegations related to mortgage and residency fraud. The event, scheduled for Tuesday evening from 5:30 to 7 p.m., is calling for donations ranging from $500 to as much as $18,000—the maximum contribution legally allowed under New York campaign finance law. The invitation, which includes a photo of James encircled by a rainbow gay pride flag, emphasizes her progressive credentials and determination to continue her work. The fundraiser will be held at the home of activists Rod Grozier and Rob Smith. Smith, the founder and CEO of The Phluid Project, a company known for its gender-neutral clothing line, is a prominent figure in left-wing activist circles. On the event’s ActBlue page, organizers stated, “Letitia James is fighting for our rights every single day. This is our opportunity to show Letitia that we have her back.” The push for campaign cash comes on the heels of a federal criminal referral involving the Attorney General. She is accused of making false claims about her primary residence in official documents related to a property purchase in Norfolk, Virginia. According to a document reviewed by The Post, James signed paperwork in August 2023 asserting, “I intend to occupy this property as my principal residence.” At the time, James was already serving as New York’s Attorney General and also owned a residence in Brooklyn. This claim could be problematic, as New York law mandates that its attorneys general must reside in the state for at least five years prior to election and while holding office. James purchased the Virginia property with her niece, further complicating her legal standing. The Post also reported that several individuals living near the Virginia property stated they had never seen James at the home. Federal Housing Finance Agency Director William Pulte outlined the accusations in a letter addressed to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. The letter not only focused on the Virginia residence but also highlighted discrepancies regarding a building James owns in Brooklyn. She reportedly claimed the building contains four apartments, though city records indicate it actually has five. That distinction could affect mortgage terms, as buildings with four or fewer units are eligible for more favorable loan conditions. Pulte noted these issues could amount to criminal charges such as wire fraud, mail fraud, bank fraud, and making false statements to a financial institution. James’ office has fired back at what it called “weaponization of the federal government” by the Trump administration, a statement that reflects the AG’s longstanding adversarial relationship with former President Donald Trump and his allies. However, the office did not offer a direct rebuttal to the specific allegations detailed in the referral. As of yet, there has been no response from James' team regarding media inquiries about the fundraiser. Nonetheless, the event is moving forward, indicating that James is determined to stay on the political offensive, even as questions about her real estate dealings continue to swirl. Based on a report by NYP 2025-04-18

UPDATE: Kilmar Abrego Garcia and MS-13 allegations Kilmar Abrego Garcia, an immigrant from El Salvador, is at the center of a heated debate following accusations by the White House linking him to the notorious MS-13 gang. While the government has declared that Abrego Garcia will "never live" in the United States again, the man himself has denied any affiliation with the gang and has not been convicted of any crime. Despite the public and political uproar, many questions about his alleged ties to MS-13 remain unanswered. According to court documents, Abrego Garcia entered the U.S. illegally in 2012. His first brush with law enforcement occurred in March 2019 when he and three others were detained in a Home Depot parking lot in Hyattsville, Maryland. Officers claimed the group was loitering and identified Abrego Garcia and two others as MS-13 members. The basis for this identification came from a “Gang Field Interview Sheet,” which noted that Abrego Garcia was wearing a Chicago Bulls hat and a hoodie featuring presidents with rolls of money covering their eyes, ears, and mouths. Police wrote that such attire was “indicative of the Hispanic gang culture,” asserting that the Bulls logo specifically suggested membership in MS-13. Steven Dudley, a journalist and expert on MS-13, offered a more cautious interpretation. While acknowledging that the Chicago Bulls logo had, at times, been adopted as a symbol by the gang, he stressed that this doesn’t prove membership. “Any assertions about gang affiliation would need to be corroborated with testimony, criminal history, and other corroborating evidence,” Dudley explained. Police also claimed that a “proven and reliable source” had informed them that Abrego Garcia was part of MS-13’s “westerns clique,” holding the rank of “chequeo.” However, Dudley clarified that “chequeo” is not an actual rank, but a term used for recruits who have not yet been initiated. Nevertheless, the judge presiding over Abrego Garcia’s 2019 case found enough evidence—based on the confidential source—to conclude that he was affiliated with the gang, a finding later upheld by another judge. This resulted in his being denied bail. During this time, he filed for asylum to avoid deportation to El Salvador, claiming his family had been targeted by Barrio-18, a rival gang. In October 2019, he was granted a "withholding of removal" order—an immigration status that stopped his deportation due to the likelihood of harm if returned to El Salvador. His legal team stated that this was based on a “well-founded” fear of persecution, citing previous threats and extortion attempts by Barrio-18. Since then, Abrego Garcia has remained in the U.S. under this protective status, attending all required check-ins with immigration authorities without any reported issues. Separate allegations have also surfaced. In 2021, his wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, filed a protective order alleging domestic abuse. However, she later stated that she chose not to pursue legal action and that they worked through the matter privately, including attending counseling. Most recently, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt accused Abrego Garcia of being involved in human trafficking. This claim appeared to stem from a report by the conservative news outlet The Tennessee Star, which stated that he was stopped by a Tennessee highway patrol officer in December 2022 while transporting seven passengers. The report, citing unnamed sources, said the FBI was contacted, but Abrego Garcia and the passengers were later released. The BBC has not independently verified this report and has reached out to authorities for comment. Based on a report by BBC Verify 2025-04-18

Meloni and Trump Signal Hope for US-EU Trade Deal Amid Tariff Tensions From the moment she arrived at the White House, Giorgia Meloni was warmly welcomed. Trump called her a "great prime minister" and said she had "taken Europe by storm". The high-profile meeting at the White House, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and former U.S. President Donald Trump expressed strong optimism about the prospects of a renewed trade agreement between the United States and the European Union. Though tangible policy outcomes were limited, Meloni did succeed in persuading Trump to accept an invitation to Rome. She hopes this future visit will serve as a platform for dialogue between Trump and key European figures, potentially including Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission. Such a meeting could prove pivotal in mending transatlantic tensions and reinforcing European voices ahead of a possible second Trump term. Meloni also took the opportunity to highlight her government's domestic achievements. “I'm proud of sitting here as prime minister of an Italy that today has a very good situation—a stable country, a reliable country,” she said. She cited falling inflation and improved employment figures as signs of progress, before turning to Trump with a grin and saying, “Forgive me if I promote my country, but you're a businessman and you understand me.” Trump responded with a broad smile. In her post-meeting remarks, Meloni didn’t shy away from ideological themes either. She criticized what she termed “woke ideology” and reaffirmed her government’s stance in the “war against illegal migration,” underscoring her alignment with Trump on cultural and security matters. The next stop on Meloni’s diplomatic push will be her meeting with U.S. Vice President JD Vance in Rome, further cementing her growing influence in transatlantic politics. Whether or not a trade deal materializes in the near future, her visit to Washington has clearly elevated her profile as a key player in shaping the future of EU-U.S. relations. Based on a report by BBC 2025-04-18

Signs of Life on Distant Ocean Planet Raise Hopes for Alien Discovery In what scientists are calling a groundbreaking moment in the search for extraterrestrial life, a planet located 124 light years from Earth has shown remarkable signs that it could be inhabited. K2-18b, a so-called "hycean" world—meaning it has a hydrogen-rich atmosphere and a surface entirely covered by liquid water—may be teeming with microscopic life. Researchers analyzing data from NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) report with 99.7 per cent certainty that at least one gas has been detected in the planet’s atmosphere that, on Earth, is exclusively produced by living organisms. “These are the first hints we are seeing of an alien world that is possibly inhabited,” said a Cambridge astrophysicist, describing the finding as an “astounding” leap forward. “It was astounding … it was an incredible realisation seeing the results emerge,” he continued, calling the discovery “a shock to the system” and “a very fundamental advancement in our search for life.” The gases in question—dimethyl sulphide (DMS) and dimethyl disulphide (DMDS)—are composed of carbon, hydrogen, and sulphur. On Earth, these compounds are primarily produced by living organisms such as photosynthetic plankton, certain bacteria, seaweeds, and plants. DMS, in particular, is commonly released when marine plankton become stressed. What makes the finding so significant is that these gases decay within hours after being produced. For them to exist in such detectable concentrations—at least ten parts per million in K2-18b’s atmosphere—they must be continuously replenished, something scientists believe is unlikely to occur without biological activity. K2-18b orbits the star K2-18 in the constellation Leo. It is 2.6 times the radius of Earth and completes one orbit every 33 days, comfortably within the habitable zone of its star. The planet’s composition—especially its hydrogen-rich atmosphere and global ocean—makes it an ideal candidate for harboring life. According to a study published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, “DMS and DMDS are both molecules uniquely produced by life on Earth and predicted as promising biosignatures in habitable exoplanets.” The first signs of DMS were observed by JWST in 2023, alongside carbon dioxide and methane, though initial confidence levels varied widely. However, recent observations using a different JWST instrument that captures mid-infrared light have confirmed the presence of DMS with 99.7 per cent certainty. Dr Michael Steinke, a DMS expert from the University of Essex who was not involved in the study, remarked that the combination of water, methane, and DMS in the planet’s atmosphere seems to “tick quite a few boxes” in identifying K2-18b as a prime location in the ongoing search for life beyond Earth. The discovery propels K2-18b ahead of nearer celestial bodies like Mars, Europa, and Enceladus, the latter two being icy moons of Jupiter and Saturn, which have also shown promise due to their subsurface oceans. Now, however, it appears that a distant, water-covered world in the constellation of Leo might become humanity’s most compelling lead in the quest to answer the age-old question: are we alone in the universe? Based on a report by The Times 2025-04-18

The controversy surrounding the Home Affairs Select Committee’s recent report into the Southport riots has reignited debate over whether British policing is truly impartial. For many, the findings—declaring claims of "two-tier policing" as “baseless” and “unsubstantiated”—appear entirely disconnected from the public’s lived experience. The label “Two-Tier Keir” has become a popular moniker for Prime Minister Keir Starmer, reflecting a widespread belief that he applies inconsistent standards depending on political expediency. As one satirical cartoon once captured, Starmer is depicted halting only “some” of an unruly crowd, implying selective enforcement and political favoritism. This perception has not formed in a vacuum. Critics argue that the government has made symbolic gestures toward minority communities while ignoring the cultural and religious traditions of the majority. An Eid message from No. 10 coincided with Mother’s Day, yet there was no public acknowledgment of that cherished family occasion. Similarly, while celebrations like Vaisakhi were recognized, Christian holidays such as Palm Sunday passed without mention. For some, this pattern suggests a deliberate attempt to sideline Britain's Christian heritage. Councillor Ray Connolly, whose wife Lucy was imprisoned following a controversial tweet after the Southport tragedy, described a conversation in a café with former Labour voters. Their reason for turning against Starmer? “He’s not for the British.” While simplistic, Connolly suggests it echoes a broader disillusionment. Starmer’s government has also been criticised for failing to fully investigate grooming gangs, with the opposition rejecting a national inquiry. The case of Jess Phillips, MP for Birmingham Yardley and Minister for Women and Equalities, further fanned the flames when she appeared to backtrack on promises for local inquiries, a move seen as a betrayal by many victims. Public anger was compounded by the treatment of peaceful protestors and online commentators following the Southport attack. While violent rioters were arrested—as they should have been—others, like Peter Lynch, were treated with similar severity for merely expressing outrage. Lynch later took his own life in jail. The government’s determination to crack down on what it calls “far-right narratives” has, in practice, silenced those voicing legitimate concerns. The case of Axel Rudakubana, the Southport attacker, epitomized this. Authorities withheld critical details about his background—including possession of al-Qaeda material and ricin—citing legal constraints. However, these omissions led to widespread distrust and outrage when the truth emerged. Meanwhile, peaceful citizens faced swift punishment. Lucy Connolly remains in prison, denied time with her family, while other incidents involving serious assaults—such as a brawl at Manchester Airport involving two Muslim men—saw delayed or watered-down responses. A senior police source claimed the focus was more on investigating leaks of CCTV footage than prosecuting the offenders. In another overlooked incident, a police officer in Stoke-on-Trent was filmed advising Muslim demonstrators to dispose of weapons at a mosque to avoid arrest—something unimaginable if said to white protestors. Kemi Badenoch voiced concern about this disparity, tweeting that “the perception of bias in the application of the law” was dangerous and “fuelling radicalisation.” She warned that treating individuals like Lucy Connolly more harshly than actual rioters was creating a sense of injustice among the public. Ultimately, whether labelled “perception” or fact, the belief that there are double standards in British policing has taken root. The Home Affairs Committee’s blanket dismissal of such concerns has only deepened suspicion. As one police source put it: “Different containment strategies for different groups” is the new normal. In a country where 65 people a day are recorded for “non-crime hate incidents,” many feel that the line between maintaining public order and controlling public opinion has been dangerously blurred. At the heart of the unrest is a deep yearning for fairness—something that many fear has been lost in the pursuit of appeasing select groups while silencing others. Based on a report by The Telegraph 2025-04-17

Former President Joe Biden has reentered the public eye with a pointed rebuke of the Trump administration, focusing on what he described as a dangerous assault on Social Security. Though he refrained from directly naming Donald Trump, Biden made it clear during his speech in Chicago that he believes the current administration is undermining the safety net relied upon by millions of Americans. “In fewer than 100 days, this administration has caused so much damage and destruction. It’s breathtaking,” Biden said to a room of approximately 200 attendees at the conference of Advocates, Counselors, and Representatives for the Disabled on Tuesday. He condemned what he called sweeping job cuts at the Social Security Administration, saying the Trump-era policies had gutted vital services. “They’ve taken a hatchet to the Social Security Administration,” he said. In a speech that stretched for about 30 minutes, Biden relied on familiar language and stories to make his case. Terms like “folks” and “I mean it sincerely” peppered his remarks, while he recounted his upbringing in Scranton, Pennsylvania, and his family's financial struggles. Those personal anecdotes served to frame his central argument—that Social Security is not merely a program, but “a sacred promise.” Biden’s speech coincided with the “Social Security Day of Action,” a coordinated effort by advocacy groups to protest what they describe as a growing threat to the program. His appearance in Chicago’s River North neighborhood came just blocks away from a major campaign fundraiser held for him before he dropped out of the 2024 presidential race. Though no longer running for office, Biden appears intent on choosing moments to stay publicly engaged, especially on issues he has long championed. “The result is a lot of needless pain and sleepless nights,” he said, criticizing what he views as a reckless dismantling of key institutions. “They’re shooting first and aiming later,” he added, underscoring the urgency he feels about the issue. While Biden avoided mentioning Trump by name, the White House did not return the favor. In response to the former president’s remarks, a spokesperson labeled the speech “embarrassing” and directed attention to the official Social Security feed on X (formerly Twitter), which accused Biden of “lying to Americans.” Despite the criticism, some former officials from Biden’s administration said this appearance should not be seen as the beginning of a broad public campaign. Rather, they characterized it as a strategic move on a subject close to Biden’s heart. “Coming out with a big democracy, rule of law speech would have been, maybe, too on the nose,” one former official explained. “So picking Social Security, something that is real to people... and it matters to him, makes a lot of sense.” Another added that this topic allowed Biden to “still command a certain level of attention and ability to set the agenda.” Biden, now working on another book, has recently reconnected with various constituencies. He spoke to the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, where he received honorary membership, and also appeared at a Model United Nations conference. His efforts appear to be part of a broader attempt to remain active in Democratic politics without overtly stepping back into the spotlight. Other prominent Democrats seemed to welcome Biden’s reappearance. House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries praised his involvement, calling it crucial during what he described as “an all-hands-on-deck moment” to defend Social Security. “The unprecedented assault on Social Security is an all-hands-on-deck moment that requires all of us to show up, stand up and speak up,” Jeffries said, “which is why President Biden’s voice in this fight is going to be so incredibly important.” Biden’s return was introduced by former Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley, who remarked that Biden had waited an “appropriate” amount of time—nearly 100 days—before making a significant public statement. Former Senator Debbie Stabenow echoed the sentiment, saying Biden’s presence was not only welcomed but necessary. “Absolutely,” she said when asked if it was important for Biden to speak out on events unfolding in Washington. Nevertheless, Biden still faces internal party criticism. Some Democrats blame the party’s disappointing performance in the 2024 elections on his decision to stay in the race for as long as he did. David Hogg, vice chair of the Democratic National Committee, acknowledged the concerns but defended Biden’s continued engagement. “He’s not gonna stop being involved. He is a workhorse and he wants to get things done and he wants to help with the party,” Hogg said. He conceded that while Biden is a skilled legislator, “somebody can be very good at legislating, but not necessarily the right person to be out there on the front and center of things.” Biden is not the only former world leader stepping back into public discourse. Barack Obama recently criticized the Trump administration’s funding freeze for Harvard University via social media. On the same day Biden gave his speech, Justin Trudeau—who stepped down as Canada’s Prime Minister just a month ago—resurfaced in an exit interview for PBS’s Canada Files. Though Trudeau’s broadcast was recorded shortly after his final cabinet meeting, its airing during Canada’s snap election is awkward timing for a Liberal Party that is eager to move on from the unpopular former leader. “Really good,” Trudeau told interviewer Valerie Pringle when asked how he was feeling. “I’m feeling serene about everything that I got done. I think I had a good run.” Though Biden’s run may be over in terms of electoral politics, his speech in Chicago signaled that he still intends to shape the national conversation. On Tuesday, that meant reminding Americans what he believes is at stake. “Social Security is more than a government program,” he said. “It’s a sacred promise.” Based on a report by Politico 2025-04-17

CNN is setting its sights on a major digital overhaul as it navigates a turbulent period for traditional media, with CEO Mark Thompson unveiling plans to roll out new subscription services aimed at reinventing the network’s future. Despite offering limited specifics, Thompson acknowledged the scale of the challenge, describing it as part of a broader transformation gripping the entire news industry. “I don’t think this stuff is easy,” Thompson told The Financial Times in an interview. “Our industry is going through a revolution. The landscape is continuing to go through the stresses and strains of an enormous disruption of audiences and of the media generally.” Thompson, who took the helm at CNN 18 months ago, said the network’s new digital subscription strategy will begin to take shape with one streaming product launching later this year, followed by a second in 2026. His long-term goal is ambitious: building a subscription-based digital business that generates more than $1 billion in annual revenue by the end of the decade. This digital push comes at a time when CNN is under pressure. According to S&P Global Market Intelligence, the network brought in $1.7 billion in operating revenue last year, but its viewership continues to decline. In the first quarter of 2025, CNN’s total U.S. audience dropped by about 8%, despite the resurgence of President Donald Trump on the political stage. Competitors have seen mixed results, with MSNBC falling 27% and right-leaning Fox News surging by 48%, according to Nielsen data. To support the transformation, CNN parent company Warner Bros. Discovery has reportedly allocated more than $70 million to Thompson’s effort. The move has raised eyebrows within CNN, particularly since the company shuttered its previous attempt at a subscription service, CNN+, in 2022 shortly after its merger with Discovery. Now, less than two years later, CNN is revisiting the same concept under Thompson’s direction. Thompson, who successfully spearheaded a digital transformation at The New York Times, has offered only a glimpse of what CNN’s first new product will look like. He described it as a “non-news digital product, though it might be heavy in information.” The service, which will debut in the U.S. before expanding internationally, is expected to include lifestyle content and other features beyond traditional news. Early attempts to implement paywalls for CNN’s news reporting remain in development. Insiders speculate that Thompson may follow a strategy similar to what he used at The Times, where he launched successful subscription products focused on cooking, games, and wellness — offerings that broadened the brand’s appeal beyond hard news. Despite the network’s current struggles, Thompson has remained candid about CNN’s position. He previously told staff that CNN is “nowhere near ready for the future,” a sobering acknowledgment of the headwinds facing the cable news model as audiences shift to streaming and digital platforms. Compounding the challenge is CNN’s complicated relationship with Trump, who has often accused the network of biased coverage. Thompson has urged CNN journalists to approach Trump’s potential second term with balance. Earlier this year, he encouraged staff to report “objectively” and to remain “open-minded” in their political coverage. He reiterated this approach in his interview with The Financial Times, saying, “CNN’s job is to report on the government of the day in whichever country it is” in an “accurate,” “fair-minded” way that “doesn’t labor under its own prejudices of biases and doesn’t shy away from holding power to account.” He added, “We shouldn’t slip into the idea that part of our job is to oppose political forces as such. Our job is to cover the political contest, rather than to head into the ring and start throwing punches ourselves.” As CNN moves forward under Thompson’s leadership, it faces a defining test: whether it can successfully pivot to digital while preserving the journalistic values that made it a legacy brand in the first place. Based on a report by NYP 2025-04-17

White House Defends Abrego Garcia Deportation, Calling Return "Out of the Question" The White House on Tuesday firmly rejected any notion that Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Salvadoran national recently deported from the U.S., could ever be permitted to live peacefully in the country, emphasizing that his removal was inevitable due to his alleged gang ties. The administration maintains that Abrego Garcia is an MS-13 gang member and foreign terrorist, claims his family vehemently denies. Leavitt said, “Because he is a foreign terrorist and an MS-13 gang member. Not only have we confirmed that, [El Salvador] President [Nayib] Bukele yesterday in the Oval Office confirmed that as well. So he went back to his home country, where he will face consequences for his gang affiliation and his engagement in human trafficking. I’m not sure what is so difficult about this for everyone in the media to understand.” Abrego Garcia’s relatives, meanwhile, insist he is not affiliated with any gang and had escaped El Salvador as a teenager to flee violence. The government’s claim rests largely on a confidential informant’s tip alleging his involvement with MS-13 in New York — a city where Abrego Garcia reportedly has never lived. The controversy intensified after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled last week that the Trump administration must “facilitate” Abrego Garcia’s return. Despite this, there has been no apparent effort from the administration to comply with the court’s instruction. Officials have instead deflected responsibility, pointing to El Salvador’s role in any potential return. During a White House meeting on Monday, Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele firmly dismissed the idea of returning Abrego Garcia to the U.S. “How could I return him to the United States? I smuggle him to the United States? Of course I’m not going to do it. The question is preposterous,” Bukele stated, underscoring his stance. Bukele’s government has cooperated with the Trump administration on immigration matters, including accepting deportees and housing them in a high-security prison known for its harsh conditions. His continued support for the deportation aligns with his domestic policy of cracking down on gangs and organized crime. With both governments now aligned in their position, Abrego Garcia’s fate appears sealed, despite ongoing legal questions and familial objections. The administration’s unequivocal message is that his return to the U.S. is not only unlikely but unwelcome. Based on a report by The Hill 2025-04-17 Related Article: El Salvador will not return Kilmar Ábrego García deported from the US in error

Robert Jenrick Urges Solicitors’ Watchdog to Investigate Hamas Legal Challenge Robert Jenrick, the Conservative shadow justice secretary, has called for an urgent investigation into Riverway Law, the firm leading a legal challenge against the UK government’s designation of Hamas as a terrorist organisation. In a letter to the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), Jenrick demanded a “thorough and transparent investigation,” raising concerns about whether the firm has adhered to professional standards and the UK’s sanctions regime. ‘Hamas shot her twice, that’s a threat, isn’t it?’ ‘The framing of your question is appalling.’ After a British lawyer chose to represent Hamas pro bono, @TomSwarbrick1 presses him on the claim that they’re ‘no threat to Britain.’ Riverway Law submitted a 106-page application to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, arguing that the UK’s proscription of Hamas violates protections under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), particularly those concerning freedom of speech. The firm’s case, led by Hamas official Mousa Abu Marzouk, asserts that the terrorist designation is disproportionate and that Hamas poses “no threat to the UK people.” Jenrick, however, expressed alarm at the firm’s actions and questioned whether Riverway had complied with SRA guidance and broader legal standards. “There are significant questions as to whether Riverway have complied with their obligations under the UK sanctions regime, the SRA’s own published guidance, and broader professional standards expected of solicitors,” he wrote. Riverway’s director, Fahad Ansari, defended the firm’s position, stating that it had engaged with the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI), external counsel, and other experts before taking on the case. “We were in contact with OFSI, external counsel and others who had represented sanctioned organisations, to ensure that we did not breach our duties under the sanctions regime,” Ansari told The Telegraph. He also criticised Jenrick personally, calling him a “low grade politician, lack[ing] any insight on responsible public service.” Ansari’s past social media activity has also come under scrutiny. He has previously posted messages referring to Hamas as a “legitimate resistance movement,” describing its fighters as “courageous Palestinian mujahideen,” and declaring: “you should view Hamas as an army of angels.” In another post, he wrote: “Dear ICC and ICJ. You are hopeless. Only armed resistance can protect the Palestinians from this genocide.” In his April Eid message, Ansari celebrated “the courageous Palestinian mujahideen who continue to resist the Western-backed Israeli genocide entirely on their own,” and said, “You are the pride of this Ummah. May you celebrate Eid one day in a fully liberated Palestine.” In June, he posted: “If you believe genocidal Israel is the most moral army in the world, then you should view Hamas as an army of angels.” In August, he wrote: “Dear ICC and ICJ. You are hopeless. Only armed resistance can protect the Palestinians from this genocide.” Earlier this week, Riverway Law shared a video online featuring Ansari and two colleagues submitting their legal case to the Home Office. Jenrick condemned the video as “an obvious publicity stunt” with “equally obvious reputational risks” for the firm. Citing SRA principles, he said, “The way in which Riverway have publicised their legal work for Marzouk is in my opinion a repulsive breach of all of these principles.” Jenrick added, “There is legitimate public interest to ascertain whether Riverway have complied with, or are in breach of, these elements of the SRA guidance.” Ansari responded, “Any empathy that I have demonstrated towards the victims of the ongoing holocaust in Gaza do not in any way detract from the robust merits of this legal application. The right to resistance against apartheid and settler colonial states such as Israel is enshrined in international law. The views that I have expressed are consistent with that and are an exercise of the right to free speech which sits at the heart of the application – it’s a fundamental right that should be valued and not used to attack the integrity of those with whom we disagree.” Riverway Law also issued a statement asserting that legal professionals must not be conflated with their clients. “There is an established convention that lawyers shall not be identified with their clients or their clients’ causes as a result of discharging their functions, precisely because it endangers lawyers for carrying out their duties. Any media outlet that continues to promote this narrative in relation to us is effectively placing a target on our backs, and knows it.” Based on a report by The Telegraph 2025-04-17 Related Articles Hamas Challenges UK Terror Ban, Citing Human Rights and Peace Efforts The immigration lawyer fighting to legalise Hamas

Indiana Mother Charged After Armed Visit to School Over Alleged ‘Indoctrination’ An Indianapolis mother is facing felony charges after allegedly bringing a handgun onto school property and sending threatening messages to a teacher over what she claimed was the "indoctrination" of children regarding same-sex relationships. Carrie Rivers, 48, pulled her daughter out of Valley Mills Elementary School in Decatur Township on April 9 after objecting to a lesson she claimed involved “same sex relationships,” according to WTHR. Rivers told police she took issue with an assignment that involved her daughter being shown a flag representing LGBTQ+ pride. The assignment, according to school officials and police, was actually about flags from different countries and states, during which the teacher also displayed a rainbow flag with the words “be kind” on it. Following Rivers’ complaint, the teacher reportedly excused her daughter from participating in the assignment. Despite the accommodation, Rivers became increasingly upset and appeared at the school building soon after. According to a police report cited by Fox 59, she was described as an “irate parent” and was found to be carrying a holstered firearm when she entered the school—an action that constitutes a felony in Indiana. Police at the scene recovered the weapon and took Rivers into custody without further incident. She reportedly told officers she had forgotten to remove her firearm before entering the school, but also admitted that she had previously brought the weapon to school on other occasions. Officers noted that Rivers seemed confused and believed the police were there to confront the teacher, not her. After being released, Rivers allegedly sent a threatening message to the teacher, the content of which was included in court filings. The message read: “...your a child predator and your only hope is your b**** a** wife that is a cop otherwise someone else woulda already delt with u for ur wrongs. U messed with the wrong family. I'll tell you that so please say ur prayers and kiss ur kids goodbye and goodnight u never know when god says its our time so always be prepared.” She went on to say, “God will condemn you to hell not only for your personal beliefs but for the fact that you use your position to mess with the minds of our children.” That same day, a Facebook account believed to belong to Rivers sent a friend request to the teacher, accompanied by another message calling them a “sick, nasty teacher.” The message added, “You should never tell precious innocent kids that it's okay to be in a same sex relationship.” Rivers has been charged with possession of a firearm on school property and harassment. Her initial court appearance is scheduled for April 15. In response to the incident, Decatur Township schools issued a statement confirming the presence of the parent on school grounds with a concealed weapon. “No threats were made against students or staff at that time. The police suspected that the parent had possession of a concealed handgun on her person and escorted her out of the building. At that point, they took possession of the weapon from the parent without incident outside the school,” the district stated. The school district also addressed the post-incident developments. “After the incident, it came to our attention that the parent then sent harassing and threatening messages to her child’s teacher. A warrant was filed for her arrest, and she is not permitted on any Decatur Township school property,” the statement read. “We are committed to ensuring a safe learning environment for students and staff, and are grateful for the quick action of the office staff and school police in handling the situation safely.” Based on a report by The Independent 2025-04-17

Trump Eyes Wave of New Trade Deals Amid 90-Day Tariff Pause President Donald Trump is currently reviewing more than a dozen potential trade proposals from foreign governments, following his announcement last week of a 90-day hold on reciprocal tariffs. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed Tuesday that the Trump administration has received offers from at least 15 countries, each seeking individualized trade arrangements with the United States. “We’ve had more than 15 deals, pieces of paper, put on the table — proposals that are actively being considered,” Leavitt told reporters during her regular briefing. She did not disclose which nations had submitted offers but emphasized that the administration is weighing them seriously. While no formal agreements have been finalized, Leavitt projected that announcements could come in the near future. “As we’ve said consistently, more than 75 countries have reached out,” she explained. “So there’s a lot of work to do. We very much understand that, but we also believe that we can announce some deals very soon.” Among the countries speculated to be close to finalizing deals are India, Japan, and Vietnam, according to a White House official who spoke with The Post last week. These nations are seen as strong candidates for one-to-one trade arrangements with the U.S., designed to replace existing reciprocal tariffs with more tailored agreements. Meanwhile, The Wall Street Journal reported on Monday that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is actively pursuing trade pacts with other key allies, including Australia, South Korea, and the United Kingdom. These nations are said to have expressed a willingness to enter negotiations swiftly, signaling the administration’s preference to prioritize deals with longstanding partners. Trump, who made the announcement on April 9, stated the pause in imposing additional tariffs would last until early July to give his economic team sufficient time to finalize negotiations. At the time, he said, “a deal is going to be made with every one of them.” The group leading these negotiations includes several key figures: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, trade adviser Peter Navarro, National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett, and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. Ultimately, Trump himself will have the final say on whether a proposal is accepted. “We’ve got everybody in the trade team, and even deputies of people in the trade team, talking to just about everybody on Earth,” Hassett told Fox News on Monday. “I think that we’ve got more than 10 deals where there’s very good, amazing offers made to the US that Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and Howard Lutnick and the rest of our trade team of the president are stewing over whether those deals are good enough.” Hassett also noted that it’s not yet decided whether deals would be announced individually or as a group, suggesting the administration is weighing the political and economic impact of both approaches. While talks with many nations are progressing, China remains the lone country still locked in a full-blown trade war with the United States. Both countries have raised tariffs on each other’s goods to as high as 125%. Trump made it clear that the next step is in Beijing’s hands. “The ball is in China’s court,” he said in a statement shared by Leavitt. “China needs to make a deal with us. We don’t have to make a deal with them. There’s no difference between China and any other country, except they are much larger and China wants what we have — what every country wants that we have — the American consumer, or to put another way, they need our money.” Based on a report by NYP 2025-04-17

Karoline Leavitt: The Young Firebrand Behind Trump’s Messaging Revival At just 27 years old, Karoline Leavitt has emerged as one of the most powerful voices in Washington, serving as Donald Trump’s White House press secretary with a combination of poise, zeal, and strategic ferocity. Equal parts cheerleader and attack dog, Leavitt commands the briefing room with confidence and fluency in Trump’s language, reflecting his combative approach to the media and public discourse. Standing beside older administration officials, including the Treasury Secretary, Leavitt has often taken charge in defending controversial policy decisions, such as a recent reversal on tariffs. “Many of you in the media clearly missed The Art of the Deal,” she told reporters. “You clearly failed to see what President Trump is doing here.” When reporters pushed back, suggesting the move was a retreat amid market panic, she swiftly countered, “We finally have a president here at the White House who is playing the long game.” Despite her youth, Leavitt presents herself with authority on matters ranging from foreign policy to immigration. When questioned about Chinese military actions around Taiwan, she responded with a detailed statement, noting that “the president is emphasising the importance of maintaining peace in the Taiwan Strait.” She proudly cited, “That is directly from the national security adviser just for you, Steve Holland of Reuters.” Leavitt's rise reflects a shift in Trump’s communications strategy—away from the often unstable tenures of past press secretaries. From Sean Spicer’s false claims about inauguration crowd sizes to Anthony Scaramucci’s expletive-laced downfall after just 11 days, the role has historically been fraught. Sarah Huckabee Sanders and Kayleigh McEnany brought a more combative tone, with McEnany once pledging never to lie, only to later be accused of distorting facts during the 2020 election aftermath. Leavitt, once McEnany’s assistant, has learned from them all. Her own background is a blend of ambition and conservative values. Raised in Atkinson, New Hampshire, where her father ran a used car dealership, she told the Eagle-Tribune, “He reminds me of President Trump.” A former softball scholar at Saint Anselm College, she cut her political teeth writing conservative columns and interning at the White House. After graduation, she quickly climbed the ranks, eventually running for Congress in 2022. Though she lost the general election, she emerged with thicker skin—and a husband, Nicholas Riccio, a man in his late fifties whom she met during her campaign. “Yes! Of course! It’s an atypical love story,” she told Megyn Kelly. Leavitt returned to politics with renewed vigor, assuming the press secretary role after Trump’s re-election. Her first day in the briefing room made waves—not just for her bold crimson outfit and prominent cross necklace, but for her pledge to “provide the truth” while accusing media outlets of spreading lies. Her confrontational stance extended to even minor disputes, such as insisting that the Gulf of Mexico be called the “Gulf of America.” When questioned, she snapped, “It is a fact that the body of water off the coast of Louisiana is called the Gulf of America.” As Trump’s administration invites podcasters and streaming personalities into the press corps, Leavitt has embraced the evolving media landscape. Friendly outlets like Real America’s Voice now share the floor with CNN and NBC, with its reporter Brian Glenn praising her, “You look great... you’re doing a great job.” She claims mainstream reporters appreciate her too—“They’ll come in my office every day and they’ll admit that off the record,” she said. Yet critics see her differently. “She’s a propagandist,” one anonymous reporter stated. “All she does is berate the White House journalists. It’s an abusive relationship.” Leavitt, however, thrives on confrontation. When The Atlantic published leaked messages detailing strike plans on Yemen, she attacked its editor, Jeffrey Goldberg, as a “peddler” of hoaxes and blamed him for fueling misinformation since the Iraq War. “Do you trust the secretary of defence... who has served in combat?” she asked pointedly. “Or do you trust Jeffrey Goldberg?” Whether delivering sound bites that go viral or sidestepping tough questions with rhetorical jabs, Karoline Leavitt has become a central force in shaping the Trump administration’s voice. With a sharp tongue, unwavering loyalty, and a camera-ready presence, she has turned one of the most difficult jobs in Washington into a personal platform—and possibly a launchpad for an even bigger political future. Based on a report by The Times 2025-04-17

UK Supreme Court Rules ‘Woman’ Means Biological Female, in Landmark Decision Britain’s Supreme Court has ruled that the legal definition of the word “woman” in the Equality Act 2010 refers exclusively to biological females, delivering a resounding win for gender-critical feminist campaigners and sparking serious concern among transgender rights activists. In a unanimous ruling delivered Wednesday, Deputy President of the Supreme Court Patrick Hodge stated, “The unanimous decision of this court is that the terms woman and sex in the Equality Act 2010 refer to a biological woman and biological sex.” The ruling was quickly hailed as a landmark moment by advocates who argue that biological sex is fixed and legally significant, particularly when it comes to protecting women-only spaces and services. Meanwhile, transgender activists voiced alarm, warning the decision could strip trans individuals of essential legal protections. The judgment could have far-reaching consequences across the UK, particularly for single-sex services in England, Scotland, and Wales. These include services such as women’s refuges, hospital wards, and sports clubs — all of which may now have firmer legal grounds to exclude trans women, even those who hold Gender Recognition Certificates (GRCs), from spaces intended for biological females. The UK government welcomed the ruling, calling it a source of “clarity and confidence” for women and those responsible for running gender-specific services. “Single-sex spaces are protected in law and will always be protected by this government,” a government spokesperson said in a statement after the ruling. Kishwer Falkner, chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), said the decision addressed real challenges facing those trying to maintain single-sex provisions. “The judgement has addressed challenges faced by those seeking to maintain single-sex spaces, and the rights of same-sex attracted persons to form associations,” Falkner said. The ruling stems from a years-long legal battle brought by For Women Scotland, a campaign group that argues sex is biological, binary, and immutable. The case challenged changes introduced by the Scottish government to legislation governing gender balance on public boards. Back in 2018, under the leadership of then-First Minister Nicola Sturgeon, the Scottish government introduced gender quotas in an effort to increase female representation on public boards. However, in its implementation, the legislation was broadened to include trans women with gender recognition certificates under the category of “women.” For Women Scotland challenged that interpretation, arguing that it diluted the meaning of womanhood and conflicted with existing legal definitions under the UK-wide Equality Act. The Supreme Court agreed. In a pointed rebuke of the Scottish government’s guidance, the court said: “Therefore, a person with a Gender Recognition Certificate in the female gender does not come within the definition of a ‘woman’ under the Equality Act 2010 and the statutory guidance issued by the Scottish ministers is incorrect.” Transgender rights advocates have been quick to voice alarm. They argue that the ruling undermines years of hard-won legal recognition and could lead to widespread uncertainty about the rights and protections available to trans people in public life. Scottish Greens MSP Maggie Chapman called the court’s decision “deeply concerning” for the state of human rights in the UK. “This is a huge blow to some of the most marginalised people in our society,” she said, warning that it could leave many trans individuals “deeply anxious and worried about how their lives will be affected and about what will come next.” Chapman’s party, which shares power in the Scottish Parliament as part of a coalition with the SNP, has previously championed trans rights reforms, including efforts to simplify legal gender recognition. Meanwhile, the opposition Conservative Party and gender-critical feminists have celebrated the ruling as a validation of long-standing concerns over what they say is the erasure of sex-based rights. Kemi Badenoch, a former equalities minister and now leader of the opposition Conservatives, was among the most vocal supporters of the judgment. “This is a victory for all of the women who faced personal abuse or lost their jobs for stating the obvious,” she said. “Saying ‘trans women are women’ was never true in fact, and now isn’t true in law either.” The debate over how the law should define sex and gender identity has grown increasingly intense in the UK in recent years, polarising public opinion and dividing political parties. Activists on both sides of the debate have complained of facing harassment and threats as discussions around gender identity and women’s rights have become increasingly fraught. Transgender people in the UK can still legally change their gender on official documents through a GRC, but critics argue that current legal frameworks remain confusing and inconsistent — particularly when it comes to the intersection of UK-wide laws like the Equality Act and devolved policies, such as those pursued by the Scottish government. Supporters of the ruling argue that, rather than denying rights to trans individuals, it merely reasserts the original intent and wording of the Equality Act. They say this clarity is crucial to ensuring that sex-based rights — especially for women — are not undermined or redefined without public debate or parliamentary scrutiny. For Women Scotland said it was “delighted” by the ruling and described it as a “vindication” of their long-standing position. “We have said all along that the definition of woman in the Equality Act refers to biological sex. This ruling confirms that and affirms the rights of women to single-sex spaces and protections under the law,” a spokesperson for the group said. The Scottish government has yet to indicate whether it will seek to challenge or amend its policies in light of the judgment. It had previously argued that trans women with legal recognition should be treated as women in public life, a position now legally untenable under the Equality Act following the Supreme Court's interpretation. Legal experts say the ruling could be cited in future court cases involving access to single-sex services, women’s sports, and the rights of organisations to exclude individuals on the basis of biological sex. Based on a report by Politico 2025-04-16

UPDATE: Suspect Cites Gaza War Views as Motivation for Arson at Pennsylvania Governor’s Residence

A man accused of setting fire to the Pennsylvania governor’s official residence has reportedly said he was driven by political and personal opposition to the governor’s stance on the conflict in Gaza. Cody Balmer, the suspect in the case, allegedly told 911 dispatchers that he targeted Governor Josh Shapiro because of his perceived role in the suffering of Palestinians. According to a report from PennLive, which obtained the search warrant connected to the case, Balmer called 911 in the early hours of Sunday morning following the fire. During the call, he stated that Governor Shapiro "needs to know he will not take part in his plans for what he wants to do to the Palestinian people." The statements suggest that Balmer viewed the attack as a form of political retaliation, tied closely to international issues and Shapiro's position on them. CNN has not independently verified the contents of the search warrant, but a spokesperson for the Pennsylvania Courts confirmed the existence of the warrant in an email on Tuesday evening. “It was not released by my office or court administration,” the spokesperson clarified. “Once we have anything that is docketed, we will send them out immediately.” CNN has reached out to the Dauphin County District Attorney’s office and the Pennsylvania State Police for further comment. The report from PennLive also notes that during the 911 call, Balmer expressed personal anguish, saying Shapiro needed to “stop having my friends killed,” and accusing the governor of being responsible for the suffering of his community. “Our people have been put through too much by that monster,” he reportedly said. The warrant adds that Balmer’s tone and rhythm during the call suggested he may have been “possibly reading from a script.” While authorities are still investigating Balmer’s motives, Dauphin County District Attorney Fran Chardo stated that law enforcement has not yet determined whether hate or antisemitism played a definitive role in the alleged arson. “I can’t speak to it directly because it’s not of record,” Chardo said during an interview with CNN’s Jim Sciutto on Monday. However, he added, “We’re looking at the possibility that it was geared towards the governor’s religion and his views on Israel.” The attack occurred just hours after Governor Shapiro had gathered with his family and members of the Jewish community to observe Passover. Speaking at a news conference the following day, Shapiro addressed the incident with a firm message of resilience and faith. “If he was trying to terrorize our family, our friends, the Jewish community, who joined us for a Passover Seder in that room last night, hear me on this: we celebrated our faith last night, proudly and in a few hours, we will celebrate our second Seder of Passover,” the governor declared. The investigation is ongoing, and authorities have yet to release further details about the potential charges Balmer may face or whether any additional suspects are involved. Based on a report by CNN 2025-04-16 Related Article Arson Attack at Pennsylvania Governor’s Home, Suspect in Custody Possible Terrorism Charges

An inflammatory personal attack with unsubstaniated claims has been removed @Flyguy330