Social Media

A Sun Pillar caught on Camera in Rakousko, Austria. Imagine being a Hunter Gatherer / Caveman and seeing this. Truly Magical The phenomenon occurs when sunlight reflects off flat, plate-like ice crystals that are usually found in cirrus clouds high in the atmosphere. These tiny crystals act like natural mirrors, aligning themselves horizontally as they drift through the air. The reflected sunlight collectively creates the illusion of a luminous column of light extending upward or downward from the sun. What makes sun pillars so enchanting is their ethereal beauty and fleeting nature. They often appear in the golden or twilight hours, enhancing the colors of the horizon and creating a surreal visual experience. However, it is important to note that the pillar itself is not physically present above the sun. Instead, it is the result of countless reflections from ice crystals scattered across the sky. As optical illusions go, sun pillars are a vivid reminder of the intricate interactions between light and the Earth's atmosphere. Their rarity and beauty make them a delightful spectacle for those fortunate enough to witness them. So, the next time you find yourself outdoors during a crisp morning or tranquil evening, keep an eye on the horizon—you might just catch a glimpse of this celestial marvel. 2025-01-27

Update:

In a staged by Hamas in a crowded Gaza City square, four Israeli hostages were handed over to the Red Cross. Liri Albag, Karina Ariev, Daniella Gilboa, and Naama Levy—appeared healthy, walking unaided, smiling, and waving as they were released. Dressed in military-style uniforms, they held "gift bags" provided by Hamas during the orchestrated handover. The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) confirmed that the International Red Cross had notified them of the release and was facilitating the transfer of the hostages to IDF and Shin Bet forces inside the Gaza Strip. The four women were taken directly from the stage into Red Cross vehicles, marking the beginning of their journey back to Israeli territory. Once in Israel, they are set to reunite with their parents at an IDF base. Hamas announced that 70 of the 200 Palestinian prisoners to be freed by Israel as part of the ceasefire agreement would be deported outside Gaza and the West Bank. In response, Israel reaffirmed its stance that Palestinians convicted of killing Israelis should be permanently deported and barred from returning to their homes in Gaza or the West Bank under the terms of the agreement. This release highlights the fragile and complex nature of the ongoing ceasefire and prisoner exchange negotiations. While the return of the hostages brings relief to their families and the nation, it also underscores the deep divisions and tensions that persist in the region. Based on a report by BBC | TOI 2025-01-27 Related Topic: 3 Female Hostages finally released by Hamas Terrorists in Gaza

Post removed @placeholder 17. ASEAN NOW news team collects news articles from various recognised and reputable news sources. The articles may be consolidated from different sources and rewritten with AI assistance These news items are shared in our forums for members to stay informed and engaged. Our dedicated news team puts in the effort to deliver quality content, and we ask for your respect in return. Any disrespectful comments about our news articles or the content itself, such as calling it "clickbait" or “slow news day”, and criticising grammatical errors, will not be tolerated and appropriate action will be taken. Please note that republished articles may contain errors or opinions that do not reflect the views of ASEAN NOW. If you'd like to help us, and you see an error with an article, then please use the report function so that we can attend to it promptly.

Argentinian President Javier Milei has sparked controversy with claims that Britain is imprisoning individuals for exposing crimes committed by immigrants. Speaking at the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland, Milei accused the UK government of concealing such crimes and silencing dissent, likening the situation to the broader influence of "woke-ism" in distorting the issue of immigration. “Is it not true that right now as we speak, in the UK, citizens are being imprisoned for exposing horrifying crimes committed by Muslim migrants? Crimes that the Government seeks to conceal?” Milei asserted during his speech. However, the president provided no specific details or evidence to substantiate his claims. Milei's remarks echo recent interventions by billionaire Elon Musk, who has voiced support for individuals he believes were wrongfully imprisoned in connection with social media posts during riots. Musk has also controversially claimed that Tommy Robinson, the founder of the far-right English Defence League, is a political prisoner. While Robinson, whose real name is Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, has been convicted of multiple crimes, Musk’s defense of him has drawn criticism for its inaccuracy. Milei, who has publicly praised Musk and was photographed with him last year, expressed admiration for the billionaire during his speech. The Argentinian leader accused the Davos attendees of being “ideologues of woke barbarity,” using his platform to denounce what he perceives as the suppression of dissent in favor of a "woke" agenda. “Haven’t we heard only recently how certain European leading authorities – and quite reddish, I should say – actually have made open appeals to censorship?” Milei asked the audience. He argued that woke ideology seeks to silence those who challenge its principles, replacing freedom of speech with suppression. “What kind of society can woke-ism create? A society that replaces the free exchange of goods and services with the arbitrary redistribution of wealth at gunpoint,” he declared, criticizing the perceived economic and social effects of progressive policies. Milei also highlighted what he called an emerging international alliance of nations led by right-wing leaders who prioritize freedom and oppose the influence of woke ideology. He praised figures such as Donald Trump, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele. “Slowly, an international alliance has been formed of all those nations that want to be free and that believe in the ideas of freedom,” Milei said, framing the movement as a resistance to progressive ideals. He accused woke advocates of labeling and suppressing their opponents. “If you’re white you must be racist, if you’re a man you must be a misogynist or part of a patriarchy. If you’re rich you must be a cruel capitalist. If you’re heterosexual you must be heteronormative or homophobic or transphobic,” Milei said, denouncing what he sees as a strategy to discredit dissenting voices. The Argentinian president went further, accusing woke proponents of using legal and societal means to eliminate criticism and consolidate their influence. “Beneath the rhetoric that they so often preach, what truly lies is their blatant desire to eliminate dissent, criticism and ultimately freedom so they can continue to uphold a model in which they are the main beneficiaries,” he argued. Milei’s comments have ignited debate over the validity of his accusations and the broader implications of his rhetoric. While some view his speech as a rallying cry for free speech and individual liberties, others criticize it as inflammatory and lacking evidence. As the world watches, Milei’s words continue to generate strong reactions both at home and abroad. Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2025-01-25

Sainsbury’s has announced plans to cut 3,000 jobs, marking a significant shift in the retail giant’s operations as it grapples with rising costs and the impact of recent tax changes. The cuts will see the elimination of 20% of senior management roles, the closure of 61 in-store cafés, the removal of hot food and pizza counters, and the introduction of self-service bread-slicing stations to replace bakery staff. The decision comes as part of an ongoing effort to reduce £1 billion in operating costs, following the loss of 1,500 jobs last year. This year’s cuts, representing a 2% reduction in the company’s total workforce, are partly influenced by steeper employer tax burdens introduced in Chancellor Rachel Reeves’s October budget. Sainsbury’s chief executive, Simon Roberts, highlighted the challenges the company faces in adapting to a difficult economic landscape. He said, “As we accelerate into year two and beyond of our strategy, we are facing into a particularly challenging cost environment which means we have had to make tough choices about where we can afford to invest and where we need to do things differently to make our business more efficient and effective.” Roberts recently criticized the Chancellor’s £25 billion tax measures, including the increase in National Insurance contributions for employers, which is expected to add around £140 million to Sainsbury’s annual costs. He expressed frustration at the lack of time businesses were given to prepare for the changes, warning that the tax hike would have a “significant impact” on supermarkets due to their large workforce. The broader retail sector is also feeling the strain of these policies. Competitors such as Tesco and Marks & Spencer have echoed concerns that rising operational costs will inevitably lead to higher prices for consumers. Sainsbury’s is exploring redeployment options for affected staff and has pledged to offer support packages exceeding statutory requirements. While the closure of cafés and food counters will make way for more fresh food offerings, the company insists these changes align with customer preferences, noting that their most loyal shoppers rarely use the cafés. Additionally, Sainsbury’s claims that new bread recipes and self-slice stations will enhance bread quality and consistency, though it has not disclosed how many bakery jobs will be impacted. Clive Black, director of Shore Capital, described the restructuring as a reflection of broader economic challenges. “We see these next steps in Sainsbury’s Next Level programme as both a continuum and evolution of its plans in the light of the Chancellor’s Budget, one that is unfortunately very painful for those to be leaving the firm, but necessary for Sainsbury’s if it is to sustain its competitiveness to shoppers, which includes mitigation of aforementioned state-induced costs, looking after its ongoing workforce, and seeking to reward its shareholders.” Black also warned of a potential rise in unemployment across the UK if government policies fail to address the economic pressures facing businesses. Sainsbury’s, like many in the retail sector, is navigating a complex environment shaped by increased operational expenses and shifting consumer behaviors. These measures, while difficult, aim to position the company for long-term sustainability amid a challenging economic backdrop. Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2025-01-25

The UK government is set to revise its controversial changes to tax rules for non-domiciled residents following a record exodus of millionaires from the country. Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced the amendments during a fringe event at the World Economic Forum in Davos, acknowledging concerns raised by the non-dom community. “We have been listening to the concerns that have been raised by the non-dom community,” Reeves told Emma Tucker, editor of *The Wall Street Journal*. She revealed that an amendment to the Finance Bill would soon be tabled, increasing the generosity of the temporary repatriation facility. This facility allows non-doms to transfer money into the UK without incurring significant taxes, and the revised rules will expand the criteria for eligibility. Reeves also sought to address fears regarding double-taxation agreements, assuring non-doms that the changes would not affect such arrangements. “There’s been some concerns from countries that have double taxation conventions with the UK, including India, that they would be drawn into paying inheritance tax,” she said. “That’s not the case: we are not going to change those double-taxation conventions.” The urgency of these changes is underscored by alarming migration data. Last year, Britain experienced a net loss of 10,800 millionaires, a staggering 157% increase compared to 2023, according to data from New World Wealth and Henley & Partners. This outflow of wealthy residents was second only to China and included 78 centi-millionaires and 12 billionaires. The majority relocated to European countries such as Italy and Switzerland, as well as the United Arab Emirates. The exodus is expected to continue, with tax advisers reporting a growing number of British entrepreneurs considering leaving the UK due to the tax hikes announced in the autumn budget. The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) previously forecasted that Labour’s changes to the non-dom regime would generate over £33 billion for the exchequer during this parliament. A significant portion of this estimate relied on non-doms paying £10.6 billion in taxes at reduced rates through the temporary repatriation facility. However, the OBR has admitted to a “very high” degree of uncertainty in its predictions. Achieving these figures depends not only on non-doms remaining in the UK but also on their willingness to bring assets worth tens of billions of pounds into the country to take advantage of the facility’s newly lowered 12% tax rate. The record outflow of wealth has cast doubt on whether those considering relocating to London will follow through. Many believe that the recent tax changes, coupled with increasing financial pressures, have significantly diminished the UK’s appeal to high-net-worth individuals. As Reeves moves to adjust the rules in response to mounting concerns, it remains uncertain whether the revised measures will be enough to stem the tide of departures or restore confidence among the UK’s wealthiest residents. Based on a report by The Times 2025-01-25

In an unprecedented move, U.S. private security contractors are set to operate a critical checkpoint in Gaza, deploying armed personnel to the enclave as part of a broader multinational effort. According to two Israeli officials and a source with direct knowledge, the initiative is expected to commence in the coming days. This marks the first time in decades that U.S. private security companies will take on such a role in Gaza. The contractors' involvement comes under the framework of the Gaza hostage and ceasefire deal, brokered by the United States, Egypt, and Qatar. Their primary responsibility will be to inspect Palestinian vehicles traveling from southern Gaza to northern Gaza, ensuring that no rockets or heavy weapons are being transported. This arrangement reflects an attempt to balance security concerns with the need for displaced Palestinians to return to northern Gaza. The history of U.S. operations in Gaza has been fraught with challenges. In 2003, three U.S. government security guards lost their lives in an attack on an American convoy, an incident attributed to Hamas by Israeli officials. Since then, U.S. governmental or affiliated activities in Gaza have been significantly restricted due to security concerns. This recent development addresses a key impasse in the ongoing ceasefire negotiations. Israel insisted on security checks for Palestinians returning to northern Gaza via the Netzarim corridor, a vital route south of Gaza City. Hamas initially rejected this demand. The compromise reached allows vehicles to access northern Gaza through a single road, subject to inspections at a checkpoint operated by a neutral third party. A source familiar with the matter described the consortium's role as overseeing and securing vehicle inspections along Salah al-Din Road, which facilitates the safe return of displaced Palestinians while ensuring no weapons are transported northward. The multinational security consortium comprises three private companies selected by the U.S., Egypt, and Qatar, with the agreement of both Israel and Hamas. One of the U.S. companies involved, Safe Reach Solutions (SRS), has developed the operational plan for the checkpoint. Another, UG Solutions, specializes in armed security and employs personnel with backgrounds in U.S. military special forces, alongside others of varied nationalities. Additionally, an Egyptian security company approved by Egyptian intelligence will contribute to the initiative. There are indications that more companies or nationalities could join the consortium in the future. The U.S. contractors' role is expected to last until the conclusion of the hostage deal's first phase. This timeline could extend if a second phase is negotiated, potentially including a complete Israeli withdrawal from Gaza, or if hostilities resume. A source emphasized the multinational consortium’s impartiality, highlighting its role as a symbol of international support for the ceasefire. "The consortium underscores its commitment to peace, ensuring adherence to the ceasefire agreement and fostering long-term stability in Gaza," the source stated. This deployment reflects a collaborative effort to navigate complex security and humanitarian challenges, aiming to establish a framework for stability in a volatile region. Based on a report by AXIOS 2025-01-25

Donald Trump's appearance at the World Economic Forum (WEF) may have been virtual, but its impact reverberated throughout the gathering. For three days, he loomed over discussions, dominating conversations from afar. On the fourth day, he addressed the forum directly from the White House, delivering a speech that left no doubt about his administration's combative stance on global economic relations, particularly with Europe. The forum, known for its mix of global financial leaders, political figures, civil society representatives, and celebrities, witnessed a speech brimming with confidence in U.S. economic power. Trump launched a direct challenge to those not aligned with his vision. Initially adhering to familiar themes of his domestic agenda, Trump soon shifted his focus. Spurred by a question from Stephen Schwarzman, co-founder of Blackstone Group and a former adviser, he addressed the frustrations of many businesses over European Union regulations. Trump criticized what he viewed as unfair trade practices and taxes imposed on American companies. “They don’t take our food, they don’t take our cars, but they send us cars by the million,” he declared, pointing to what he described as a trade imbalance. He also took aim at EU demands for $15 billion in back taxes from Apple and ongoing investigations into American tech giants like Google and Facebook. “These companies, like them or not, are American companies. Nobody’s happy with it, and we are going to do something about it,” he asserted. While emphasizing his frustrations, Trump also presented a stark offer to businesses. He proposed a corporate tax rate of just 15% for companies willing to shift their manufacturing to the United States, coupled with the threat of tariffs for those that chose otherwise. This bold proposition underscored his commitment to reshaping global trade in America’s favor, even if it risked retaliatory measures. In the audience, leaders from the European Central Bank, World Trade Organization, International Monetary Fund, and various government officials reacted with visible unease. Trump’s rhetoric was unapologetically disruptive, making clear his intention to challenge the status quo. As if to underscore his point, Trump highlighted a massive $600 billion investment promise from Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, suggesting he “round it up to a trillion.” He positioned this as a testament to America’s economic appeal and its ability to command significant global investments. Trump did briefly touch on the pressing issue of the war in Ukraine, referring to the "millions of dead bodies lying on the flat fields" and calling for peace efforts to begin. However, he offered little clarity, remarking that the path to peace lay with Russia. “Ukraine is ready,” he added, leaving the audience to grapple with the implications. As the forum drew to a close, attendees departed Davos under no illusions about the disruption Trump’s policies could bring. The week had started with speculation about what a potential second Trump term might mean for the global order. By its end, delegates from across the spectrum of money, power, and influence had a clearer picture: one defined by disruption, unpredictability, and an unwavering push for American dominance. Based on a report by Sky News 2025-01-25

A recent report claims that as many as one in 12 people living in London could be illegal migrants, amounting to an estimated 585,000 individuals. This startling figure highlights the capital’s status as a hub for undocumented migration, with 60% of all illegal migrants in the UK believed to reside in the city. The study, commissioned by Thames Water, provides estimates suggesting that between 390,355 and 585,533 people in London meet the criteria for being illegal migrants. Most undocumented individuals are thought to have initially entered the UK legally on work, study, or visitor visas but later overstayed their permitted durations. The findings were obtained through freedom of information-style requests and aim to shed light on the scale of undocumented migration in the capital. The Home Office itself does not release specific data on illegal migrant numbers, making this report a rare insight into an issue that is often difficult to quantify. Nationally, the study estimates that approximately 1 million unauthorized migrants could be living across the UK, with London accounting for the majority. However, migration experts have suggested that even these figures might be conservative, as much of the underlying data dates back to 2017—prior to the significant increase in Channel crossings. The research was initially conducted to identify “hidden” and “transient” water users in London, aiming to improve the utility provider’s ability to meet customer demands. By analyzing National Insurance registrations from non-EU nationals, the study pinpointed irregular migration patterns across the city’s boroughs. There are numerous pathways through which individuals can become illegal migrants in the UK. These include overstaying work, study, or visitor visas, entering the country illegally, or remaining in the UK after an asylum claim has been rejected. Additionally, children born in the UK to undocumented parents may also be considered illegal migrants under the law. Although precise figures are challenging to determine, most undocumented migrants are believed to originate from regions such as Asia, sub-Saharan Africa, and the Americas. The situation has been further exacerbated by an ongoing rise in Channel crossings. On Tuesday alone, the Home Office reported that 129 migrants crossed the Channel, with many more arrivals the following day. The issue has put significant political pressure on the UK government. In 2024, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer vowed to reduce both legal and illegal immigration. However, critics argue that the Labour Party has yet to implement sufficient measures to address the problem. When questioned by reporters, Mr. Starmer defended his government’s approach, stating, “Cutting immigration will only be done with a serious plan.” He emphasized that targeting criminal smuggling networks remains one of the most effective strategies to combat illegal immigration, underscoring the need to disrupt these operations at their roots. As the debate over immigration continues, the report’s findings highlight the complexity of managing London’s growing population and the broader challenges of addressing undocumented migration across the UK. Based on a report by The Standard 2025-01-25

CNN is undergoing significant upheaval, with 200 staff members from its TV division being laid off as part of CEO Mark Thompson’s ambitious plan to reshape the network’s focus. According to an insider, the layoffs are a response to a bloated and overstaffed organization, where some employees have been accused of contributing minimally. “Layoffs all the time – they needed to cut the fat,” the source told *DailyMail.com* after Thursday’s firings. The insider described CNN as “very duplicative” and a “money pit,” underscoring the network’s inefficiency. Thompson, formerly CEO of *The New York Times* and the BBC, is steering CNN toward a digital-first strategy. In a statement to *The New York Times*, he confirmed that the layoffs are part of a broader restructuring aimed at prioritizing CNN’s digital presence over traditional TV operations. A new streaming service featuring CNN’s top stars is reportedly in the works. Despite the major shake-up, it remains unclear whether any prominent TV personalities were included in the layoffs. Thompson did, however, announce a significant programming change: Jim Acosta’s 10 a.m. hour will be replaced by *The Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer and Pamela Brown*. While rumors had previously circulated about Acosta’s future, Thompson confirmed that discussions about a new role for him are ongoing. The network is also preparing to replace those laid off with individuals who possess a more digital-focused skill set. Thompson emphasized that adapting to digital consumption is critical for CNN’s survival, stating, “If we do not follow the audiences to the new platforms with real conviction and scale, our future prospects will not be good.” CNN’s shift comes amid declining ratings and stiff competition. Following a turbulent political landscape marked by the Trump presidency and the Biden administration, CNN has lost ground to rivals Fox News and MSNBC. Ratings have dropped more than 20% since Thompson’s arrival in 2023, with election night coverage seeing even steeper declines. In a memo obtained by *The LA Times*, Thompson acknowledged the challenges, writing, “The changes we’re announcing today are part of an ongoing response by this great news organization to profound shifts in the way audiences in America consume news. It’s the early days, but we’ve already established that there’s immense demand for it not just in America but around the world.” To further its digital ambitions, CNN is also planning a subscription-based product featuring lifestyle content. This follows the launch of a $3.99 paywall on its website in October, part of the network’s efforts to diversify revenue streams. Thompson’s vision for CNN centers on providing audiences with the news they want, when they want it. He believes a streaming platform could address the constraints of traditional TV schedules and better meet the demands of a modern audience. While some industry insiders speculate about the potential departure of high-profile figures like Acosta, CNN has yet to confirm any such moves. For now, the network’s focus is on embracing digital transformation and navigating what Thompson called an “existential question” about how to stay relevant in a rapidly changing media landscape. As CNN continues its transition, the layoffs—amounting to 6% of the workforce—mark another chapter in its ongoing reinvention, one that may redefine how it delivers news in the years to come. Based on a report by Daily Mail 2025-01-25

A sweeping executive order issued by former President Donald Trump has left hundreds of transgender federal prisoners facing uncertainty and fear. The directive, signed on Trump's first day back in office, mandates that federal prisons classify inmates strictly by biological sex, disregarding gender identity. For transgender inmates, this policy shift means relocation to facilities that match their birth sex, causing widespread panic and concern. Attorney Moira Meltzer-Cohen, who represents Donna Langan—a transgender woman serving a life sentence in federal prison—voiced grave concerns about the order's implications. "It's going to be incredibly dangerous," she said. Langan, a former member of the neo-Nazi Aryan Republican Army, underwent gender-affirming surgery while incarcerated. Meltzer-Cohen warned of potential violence, saying, "I fear there could be a bloodbath if trans inmates are forced into male prisons." The executive order declares that only two sexes—male and female—will be recognized in government policy. Spaces designated for women, including bathrooms and prison facilities, will now be determined solely by biological sex. The directive also cuts federal funding for transition-related medical services and bars the use of terms like "gender" in favor of "sex." An email obtained by DailyMail.com from a federal public defender in Massachusetts highlighted the immediate impact of the policy. The email, written by public defender Sandra Gant, described the panic of a transgender inmate in Minnesota. "Her family reached out in a panic," Gant wrote. "As of this morning, she and others at FCI Waseca have been segregated and told they are being processed for transfer to a men's prison. She is terrified." Gant called on colleagues to prepare legal challenges to the policy, asking if organizations like the ACLU might be pursuing litigation. "Has anyone prepared to litigate this, or have any insights or advice on challenging this?" she inquired. The Bureau of Prisons estimates that there are approximately 1,500 transgender women and 750 transgender men in federal custody. With transfers imminent, legal advocates are scrambling to find ways to protect these individuals, who face heightened risks of assault and discrimination in facilities aligned with their birth sex. The order has drawn starkly polarized reactions. Conservative groups have lauded the policy as a return to "common sense," while transgender advocates view it as an assault on their rights. Meanwhile, Rhonda Fleming, a cisgender female inmate at Carswell Federal Medical Center in Texas, expressed relief over the new policy. Fleming, who had previously filed a lawsuit to remove transgender women from her facility, argued that biological women like herself face stress and fear in shared spaces with trans inmates. Her lawsuit, however, was dismissed just days before Trump signed the executive order. "What the judge did Wednesday was a farce," Fleming said in an interview. "It was a mockery of justice." She also claimed that some male inmates falsely identify as transgender to gain access to women’s facilities. Trump’s executive order represents a sharp departure from the policies of the Biden and Obama administrations, which had advanced protections for transgender individuals. The rollback has amplified fears within the transgender community, with many questioning the broader societal implications of these changes. For transgender inmates now facing transfers, the immediate focus remains survival in a system that many believe is ill-equipped to ensure their safety. Based on a report by Daily Mail 2025-01-25

Washington, D.C., Senator Tom Cotton (R-Arkansas) has reintroduced the PLO and PA Terror Payments Accountability Act, a bill aimed at imposing sanctions on individuals, organizations, and financial institutions that facilitate payments to Palestinian terrorists or their families. This legislation targets what has been labeled as the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and Palestinian Authority’s (PA) “pay-for-slay” program. “The Palestinian Authority and the Palestine Liberation Organization continue to support terrorism against Israel by providing hundreds of millions of dollars per year in their reprehensible ‘pay-for-slay’ program,” Senator Cotton said. He emphasized that these payments incentivize and reward anti-Semitic acts of violence, stating, “Anti-Semitic Palestinian terrorists know they can expect payment as a reward for killing Israelis and Americans—with thousands of Palestinian terrorists tied to October 7 eligible for these terror payments. Our bill will ensure that the PA, PLO, and their institutions that reward acts of terrorism are punished.” The proposed legislation has garnered support from Republican lawmakers, with Senators Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Pete Ricketts (R-Nebraska), Ted Budd (R-North Carolina), Eric Schmitt (R-Missouri), Bill Hagerty (R-Tennessee), Kevin Cramer (R-North Dakota), Rick Scott (R-Florida), Tim Scott (R-South Carolina), and Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) cosponsoring the bill. Congressman Mike Lawler (New York-17) plans to introduce companion legislation in the House. The bill outlines sanctions on: Individuals employed by the PLO or PA who facilitate or directly provide these payments, or knowingly offer significant financial, material, or technological support to the system of compensation for acts of terrorism. Entities involved in the PLO and PA’s system of compensation, including the Commission of Prisoners and Released Prisoners, the Institute for the Care of the Families of the Martyrs and the Wounded, the Palestine National Fund, and the National Association of the Families of the Martyrs of Palestine. Financial institutions participating in transactions that support the PLO and PA’s compensation systems for terrorism. This legislation reflects an effort to confront long-standing concerns over the PA and PLO’s financial incentives for terrorism. Critics of the program argue it not only perpetuates violence but also undermines peace efforts in the region. The “pay-for-slay” policy has drawn international criticism for its use of public funds to compensate individuals who commit acts of violence, with the payments often increasing based on the severity of the act. Supporters of the bill aim to hold those responsible accountable by targeting the financial infrastructure supporting these payments. Senator Cotton and his colleagues see the legislation as a decisive measure to deter terrorism and punish entities that reward acts of violence against Israeli and American citizens. The full text of the bill has been made publicly available for review, signaling a commitment to transparency as this legislation moves through Congress. Based on a report by cotton.senate.gov 2025-01-25

The World Health Organization (WHO) has taken swift measures to address financial challenges brought on by the planned withdrawal of its largest funder, the United States. According to an internal email obtained by POLITICO, the organization is freezing recruitment and cutting travel expenditures as part of broader cost-saving initiatives. In a message to staff sent on Thursday night, Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus expressed regret over the U.S. decision, stating, “As you know, the United States of America has announced that it intends to withdraw from WHO. We regret this decision and hope the new administration will reconsider it.” Tedros acknowledged the significant impact of the announcement, adding, “This announcement has made our financial situation more acute, and we know it has created significant concern and uncertainty for the WHO workforce.” To address these challenges, the WHO is halting new recruitment efforts except in critical areas and has instituted substantial reductions in travel expenses. Tedros outlined that all meetings must now be conducted virtually unless deemed absolutely necessary. Missions aimed at providing technical support to countries will also be limited to essential activities. Additional cost-saving measures include restricting the replacement of IT equipment, renegotiating major contracts, and suspending office refurbishments or capital investments unless justified by security concerns or cost-efficiency. The U.S. withdrawal, announced during the Trump administration, has cast uncertainty over the WHO’s operations, as the organization has historically relied heavily on funding from the United States to support global health initiatives. With these new measures, the WHO aims to navigate the financial strain while maintaining its critical work in public health. Based on a report by Politico 2025-01-25

The Biden family has faced a barrage of allegations, primarily from Republican critics, who accuse them of corruption and profiting from Joe Biden’s political influence. These claims have gained significant attention, particularly in the wake of Donald Trump’s suggestion that his predecessor could face investigations. The accusations center around financial dealings in multiple countries and pardons issued by President Biden to several family members, including his son, Hunter Biden. In December, a month after Trump’s election victory, President Biden issued a pardon to Hunter Biden, who had been found guilty of illegally obtaining a firearm and had admitted to tax-related charges. The pardon also extended to potential offenses Hunter “may have committed or taken part in” from 2014 to 2024. On the final day of his presidency, Biden granted clemency to additional family members, including his sister, two brothers, and two in-laws, shielding them from prosecution for actions dating back to January 2014. Critics argue these actions were an attempt to protect his family from investigations into allegations of corruption tied to Biden’s tenure as vice president from 2009 to 2017. James Comer, chairman of the House Oversight Committee, has been vocal in leading Republican efforts to scrutinize the Biden family. Comer claims to have evidence that “at least ten members of the Biden crime family and their associates raked in over $30 million by selling Joe Biden’s influence to corrupt foreign entities and individuals in China, Russia, Ukraine, Romania, and Kazakhstan.” One of the most contentious allegations involves Hunter Biden’s attempted deal in 2017 with CEFC, China’s largest private energy company. An email retrieved from Hunter’s discarded laptop allegedly referenced “the big guy” receiving a 10% stake, a term Hunter’s former business associate Tony Bobulinski claimed referred to Joe Biden. While Hunter testified that the suggestion was made without his father’s knowledge and did not materialize, Comer’s investigation has identified $8 million in payments from Chinese sources to Biden family members and associates. In Russia, a 2014 payment of $3.5 million from Elena Baturina, then Russia’s richest woman, to Hunter Biden’s business partner Devon Archer has drawn attention. Republicans allege that a subsequent dinner involving Baturina, Hunter, Joe Biden, and Archer suggests a possible quid pro quo. They point to the fact that Baturina was not subjected to U.S. sanctions as evidence of potential favoritism. Hunter Biden’s involvement with the Ukrainian gas company Burisma has also been a focal point. Appointed to Burisma’s board in 2014, he earned an annual salary of $1 million during a period when Joe Biden, as vice president, was overseeing U.S. relations with Ukraine. While Republicans argue Hunter’s role was tied to his father’s influence, Biden has maintained that his actions regarding Ukraine were aligned with international consensus, including the European Union and the International Monetary Fund. Additional allegations involve Romania, where a property entrepreneur, Gabriel Popoviciu, sent $3 million to a company associated with Hunter’s business partner. Over $1 million was later transferred to various Biden family accounts. Hunter’s legal work for Popoviciu coincided with Joe Biden’s advocacy for anti-corruption reforms in Romania, prompting ethics watchdogs to question whether Hunter was hired due to his family ties. In Kazakhstan, a 2014 wire transfer of $142,300 from businessman Kenes Rakishev to Hunter Biden’s company raised further suspicion. The payment, which coincided with Rakishev’s attendance at a dinner involving Joe and Hunter Biden, was allegedly used by Hunter to purchase a luxury car. President Biden’s decision not to pardon himself leaves him exposed to potential investigations should the Trump administration or a Republican-led Congress pursue the allegations further. James Comer has argued that Biden’s clemency actions represent “a confession of their corruption,” calling for continued scrutiny of the family’s dealings. Despite these accusations, Joe Biden has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing, emphasizing during a 2020 presidential debate that his family did not profit from his political role. The ongoing investigations and political rhetoric surrounding these claims ensure they will remain a contentious issue in the public and political arenas. Based on a report by The Times 2025-01-25

The White House announced that deportation flights have officially commenced as part of the Trump administration’s strategy to address illegal immigration. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt stated on Friday that "deportation flights have begun," releasing images of individuals boarding military aircraft. "President Trump is sending a strong and clear message to the entire world: if you illegally enter the United States of America, you will face severe consequences," Leavitt emphasized. Data obtained by Fox News Digital reveals that, over a 33-hour period from midnight on January 21 to 9 a.m. on January 22, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Enforcement and Removal Operations arrested over 460 individuals. Those detained included people with criminal records involving offenses such as sexual assault, robbery, burglary, aggravated assault, drug and weapon violations, resisting arrest, and domestic violence. The arrests included nationals from a wide range of countries, including Afghanistan, Angola, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Senegal, and Venezuela. In one notable operation, ICE agents detained several individuals at a fish market in Newark, New Jersey. The Newark operation has drawn sharp criticism from local officials, including Newark Mayor Ras Baraka. Baraka described the raid as an "egregious act" and a violation of constitutional rights, asserting that agents conducted the operation "without producing a warrant." He highlighted the case of one detainee, a U.S. military veteran, who allegedly "suffered the indignity of having the legitimacy of his military documentation questioned." "This egregious act is in plain violation of the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees ‘the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures,’" Baraka wrote in a statement. He added, "Newark will not stand by idly while people are being unlawfully terrorized." The mayor reaffirmed his commitment to protecting civil and human rights in the face of federal immigration enforcement actions. "I am ready and willing to defend and protect civil and human rights," Baraka said, underscoring Newark’s position as a city that stands against what he views as unlawful and heavy-handed tactics. The deportation flights and accompanying arrests mark a decisive step in the Trump administration’s efforts to enforce immigration laws and crack down on unauthorized entry. However, the actions have sparked heated debate, with critics pointing to concerns over constitutional violations and the treatment of those caught in enforcement operations. Based on a report by Newsweek 2025-01-25

A number of off topic baiting/trolling posts have been removed @spot replies to those posts have also been removed. The topic here is: Trump Placed all Diversity equity, and inclusion staff on paid leave. Eventual Lay Off

UPDATE: Hamas releases names of latest Israeli hostages to be freed on Saturday Hamas has released the names of four hostages expected to be freed on Saturday as part of the ceasefire deal with Israel. Karina Ariev, Daniella Gilboa, Naama Levy, Liri Albag are set to return to Israel in exchange for Palestinian prisoners. It follows the release of three Israeli hostages, including British citizen Emily Damari, last weekend and comes as the ceasefire approaches its second week. https://news.sky.com/story/hamas-releases-names-of-latest-hostages-to-be-freed-on-saturday-13295604

Update:

Update:

Update: Southport Killer Sentenced to Minimum of 52 Years for 'Pure Evil' Murders

Axel Rudakubana, 18, has been sentenced to a minimum of 52 years in prison for the horrific murders of three young girls during a Taylor Swift-themed dance workshop. Described as "sadistic" and "pure evil" by Liverpool Crown Court, the attack left seven-year-old Elsie Dot Stancombe, six-year-old Bebe King, and nine-year-old Alice da Silva Aguiar dead, while eight other children and two adults were seriously injured. ‘Moment Axel Rudakubana took a taxi to a Taylor Swift themed dance class in Southport has been released. After not paying the taxi driver, the then 17-year-old calmly entered the building in Southport. Minutes later, screams can be heard and CCTV showed children running outside.’ This senseless act of violence has left a community in mourning and a courtroom grappling with the devastation. Rudakubana's sentencing underscores the severity of his crimes, ensuring he will spend the majority of his life behind bars for actions that have forever scarred the lives of his victims and their families. Based on a report by BBC | X 2025-01-24

In a groundbreaking achievement, scientists in China have taken a significant step toward harnessing nuclear fusion, the process that powers the sun, as a potential infinite source of clean energy. The Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST), often referred to as China’s “artificial sun,” achieved a sustained operation for an extraordinary 1,066 seconds, marking a major milestone in fusion power research. The project, led by researchers at the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), aims to replicate the nuclear fusion processes occurring in the sun, offering the potential to resolve global energy crises and enable deep-space exploration. Song Yuntao, vice president of CAS’s Hefei Institutes of Physical Science and director of Hefei’s Institute of Plasma Physics, highlighted the importance of the breakthrough, stating, “A fusion device must achieve stable operation at high efficiency for thousands of seconds to enable the self-sustaining circulation of plasma, which is essential for the continuous power generation of future fusion plants.” Nuclear fusion generates energy by colliding light atoms to form a single, heavier nucleus. This process results in a mass loss that is converted into an immense burst of energy, similar to the reactions that fuel stars. Unlike nuclear fission, which splits heavy atoms and produces long-lived radioactive waste, fusion is a cleaner and safer alternative with the potential to revolutionize global energy systems. EAST’s recent accomplishment is particularly impressive. It operated at a staggering temperature of 108 million degrees Celsius for 17 minutes and 46 seconds, coming tantalizingly close to the conditions required for sustained nuclear fusion. This marks a step forward in the decades-long quest to develop a reactor capable of maintaining the extreme temperatures and pressures necessary for practical fusion energy production. For over 70 years, scientists worldwide have pursued the dream of a functioning nuclear fusion reactor, but achieving the stable, long-term operation needed for continuous energy production has proven elusive. The challenge lies in maintaining the circulation of plasma — the hot, charged gas where fusion reactions occur — at temperatures exceeding 100 million degrees Celsius, without disruptions or energy losses. EAST’s success not only pushes the boundaries of what is technically possible but also fosters collaboration in the international scientific community. “We hope to expand international collaboration via EAST and bring fusion energy into practical use for humanity,” Song said, expressing optimism about the global impact of this achievement. This milestone is a testament to the progress being made in fusion research and represents a beacon of hope in the quest for a sustainable energy future. With further advancements and cooperation, the dream of limitless clean energy may soon become a reality. Based on a report by NYP 2025-01-24

The Pentagon has announced plans to deploy as many as 1,500 active-duty troops to the U.S.-Mexico border in the coming days. This move follows executive orders issued by President Donald Trump shortly after taking office, signaling his administration’s intent to take stronger measures to combat illegal immigration. According to U.S. officials, Acting Defense Secretary Robert Salesses was expected to approve the deployment on Wednesday. While the specific units and total number of troops are still uncertain, the deployment aims to support existing border enforcement efforts. Approximately 2,500 National Guard and Reserve personnel are already stationed at the southern border, but no active-duty troops are currently involved. The role of the newly deployed forces is expected to include logistics, transportation, and construction of barriers, assisting border patrol agents. Similar tasks have been assigned to military personnel in the past under both the Trump and Biden administrations. However, these deployments could take a different turn, as there is ongoing discussion about whether the troops might engage in law enforcement, a departure from their traditional duties. By law, the Posse Comitatus Act prohibits U.S. military forces from performing domestic law enforcement functions. However, President Trump has directed officials to explore the possibility of invoking the 1807 Insurrection Act, which would allow troops to engage in civilian law enforcement on U.S. soil. The last time this act was invoked was in 1992 during the Los Angeles riots following the acquittal of police officers involved in the Rodney King case. President Trump has emphasized the importance of using military resources to address border security concerns. In his inaugural address, he declared, “I will declare a national emergency at our southern border. All illegal entry will immediately be halted, and we will begin the process of returning millions and millions of criminal aliens back to the places in which they came.” The current deployment echoes similar actions taken during Trump’s first term. In 2018, the president ordered more than 7,000 active-duty troops to the border to respond to a migrant caravan traveling through Mexico. The troops, including military police, combat engineers, and medical units, provided logistical support to border patrol agents by transporting personnel, erecting vehicle barriers, and setting up fencing. Additionally, military involvement has extended to assisting the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) with detention facilities. In 2021, the Biden administration utilized Fort Bliss in Texas as a temporary detention site for unaccompanied migrant children. However, the facility faced significant challenges, including overcrowding, exposure to harsh weather conditions, and insufficient staffing. Previous attempts to use military bases for detention have also faced logistical difficulties. For instance, in 2018, then-Defense Secretary Jim Mattis prepared Goodfellow Air Force Base in Texas to house up to 20,000 unaccompanied migrant children, but the plan was scrapped due to inadequate infrastructure. The decision to deploy additional troops marks another step in a long history of using military resources to address challenges at the U.S.-Mexico border. As this latest effort unfolds, it remains to be seen how the administration will navigate the legal and operational complexities of military involvement in border security. Based on a report by NYP 2025-01-23

In his first week back in the White House, President Donald Trump has made waves with a series of executive orders that have reignited the debate over the power of the presidency and the future of key policies. Trump signed a remarkable 26 executive orders on his Inauguration Day, a significant step in reversing many policies from the Biden administration. This move has been met with praise from Republican lawmakers, who are now scrambling to turn Trump’s actions into permanent law, fearing that a future Democratic administration could quickly undo his accomplishments. Trump’s actions have included rolling back 78 of President Biden’s executive orders, strengthening border security, ramping up domestic energy production, and establishing the new Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). He also took aim at birthright citizenship and enacted measures to make it easier to fire government workers, among other changes. Republicans are particularly focused on ensuring that Trump’s efforts to bolster border security, ramp up energy production, and reduce government regulations are codified into law to prevent future reversals. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) told The Post that Trump’s executive orders were just the beginning of what he called “our legislative agenda,” as Republicans aim to solidify these measures into law. Rep. Rich McCormick (R-Ga.) expressed concern that if these actions aren’t enshrined in legislation, a future Democratic president could reverse them. “If we don’t codify it [and] the next president, God forbid, is a Democrat, [they] will reverse everything he did,” McCormick said. Key among the orders that Republicans are eager to codify is the push for deregulation, which Trump advocates as a way to stimulate economic growth. Rep. Jeff Crank (R-Col.) pointed to the repeal of the electric vehicle mandate, a non-binding initiative from Biden’s administration that aimed for electric vehicles to make up 50% of new car sales by 2030. Trump reversed this initiative on his first day, and Republicans are determined to prevent any potential Democratic successor from resurrecting it. One of Trump’s most notable reversals is the reintroduction of the “Remain in Mexico” policy, which requires asylum seekers to wait in Mexico while their claims are processed in the U.S. This policy had been abandoned by the Biden administration in 2022 following legal challenges, but Trump’s executive order brings it back into play. Rep. Mark Harris (R-NC) emphasized that while Biden could undo Trump’s actions, Trump’s efforts would put pressure on the Mexican government to cooperate with U.S. immigration policies. Rep. Michael Rulli (R-Ohio) agreed, suggesting that passing laws would provide diplomatic cover for Mexico’s leadership to collaborate more closely with the U.S. Despite the enthusiasm among Republicans, there are significant challenges ahead. Republicans hold a narrow majority in the House, with just 218 seats to the Democrats’ 215. This margin is expected to shrink further to 217 once a special election fills a vacancy. With such a slim margin, Republicans cannot afford any defections to pass legislation. In the Senate, the 60-vote threshold needed to overcome a filibuster makes it difficult to push significant legislation through. As Trump continues to make bold moves in the White House, it’s clear that his executive orders are not just shaping his administration’s immediate priorities but also sparking a broader effort by Republicans to ensure that these policies have lasting impacts. On the campaign trail, Trump humorously quipped that he would not be a dictator “other than day one,” a comment that reflects his penchant for sweeping, immediate action. Yet, his critics remain wary of the long-term implications of such a rapid and unilateral approach to governance. Trump’s return to the White House marks the beginning of what is shaping up to be a contentious legislative battle as Republicans seek to enshrine his executive orders into law, setting the stage for the future direction of the country’s policies. Based on a report by NYP 2025-01-23