Social Media

On June 11, U.S. President Joe Biden was seen embracing his grandson, Beau Biden, accompanied by his daughter-in-law, Melissa Cohen Biden, and his son, Hunter Biden. Earlier that day, Hunter was found guilty on all three counts in his criminal gun charges trial. Despite the potential political fallout, President Biden made no effort to interfere with the prosecution, allowing his Justice Department to secure a guilty verdict that could lead to jail time for Hunter, a recovering addict. The president stated, “I will accept the outcome of this case and will continue to respect the judicial process as Hunter considers an appeal.” Biden has already indicated that he won’t pardon his son. In his initial response to the verdict, Hunter Biden refrained from attacking the judge or prosecutors. Instead, he expressed gratitude for the love and support of his family and relief at being clean again. This demeanor contrasted sharply with Trump’s reaction to his own trial and conviction nearly two weeks prior in his hush money case. Trump lashed out at witnesses, prosecutors, jurors, and the judge, claiming, “This was done by the Biden administration in order to wound or hurt a political opponent.” He dismissed the verdict as a “rigged decision,” despite the Justice Department’s non-involvement in the Manhattan district attorney’s case. Trump has since been vocal about using presidential powers to punish his political adversaries and manipulate the legal system if he regains office. In a conversation with TV psychologist Phil McGraw, Trump justified revenge, saying, “Sometimes revenge can be justified. I have to be honest. You know, sometimes it can.” He also told Fox News, “I would have every right to go after them,” referring to the Bidens. Discrediting Trump's Claims with Hunter Biden's Verdict Trump has repeatedly claimed that he cannot receive a fair trial in predominantly Democratic areas like Manhattan. Yet, Delaware, a blue state, saw a jury convict the president’s son. One juror told CNN that politics never influenced their deliberations. In Trump’s trial, jurors have remained silent, possibly due to fears of identification following Trump’s intimidation tactics. A guilty verdict against Hunter Biden in a blue state challenges the narrative that a biased justice system unfairly targets Trump. Joe Biden’s commitment to the independence of the Justice Department, as promised during his campaign, stands in stark contrast to Trump’s vow to weaponize the legal system against political opponents if re-elected. Trump has openly declared his intentions to prosecute the Bidens and dismantle what he calls the “Deep State.” Michael Zeldin, a former senior Justice Department official, highlighted on CNN Max that the Hunter Biden conviction disproves Trump’s claims of a weaponized legal system targeting Republicans. “So much for the weaponization of the Justice Department to go after just the enemies of the other side,” Zeldin said. He emphasized that the Justice Department, under Attorney General Merrick Garland, is striving to act impartially and bring worthy prosecutions to trial. The perception of Justice Department neutrality was further reinforced by comments from David Weiss, the Trump-appointed U.S. attorney in Delaware. Elevated to special counsel by Garland to avoid the impression of political bias, Weiss thanked the attorney general for allowing him to operate independently. He stated, “No one in this country is above the law. Everyone must be accountable for their actions, even this defendant.” However, Weiss also emphasized that “Hunter Biden should be no more accountable than any other citizen convicted of this same conduct.” The Political and Legal Implications Hunter Biden’s conviction and the impending tax trial in September, along with other high-profile Democratic prosecutions, challenge the notion that the Justice Department exclusively targets Republicans. Democratic Senator Robert Menendez of New Jersey is on trial for bribery and corruption, and in May, the Justice Department indicted Democratic Representative Henry Cuellar of Texas and his wife for allegedly accepting around $600,000 from Azerbaijan’s state-owned oil firm and a Mexican bank in exchange for official acts as a member of Congress. Both Democrats maintain their innocence. Despite these facts, House Republicans are set to vote on holding Garland in contempt of Congress for refusing to release President Biden’s interview recordings with former special counsel Robert Hur. Biden has invoked executive privilege over these files. The GOP Narrative and Political Reality Democratic Representative Jamie Raskin contrasted Trump’s and Biden’s responses to legal scrutiny, pointing out that Republicans attack the justice system when dissatisfied with outcomes, whereas Democrats accept legal processes even when unfavorable. “The Republicans are attacking our entire system of justice and the rule of law because they don’t like the way one case came out. Whereas the son of the president of the United States is prosecuted and I don’t hear a single Democrat crying foul,” Raskin noted. Nevertheless, inconvenient truths often fail to penetrate the Republican echo chamber. Trump’s supporters in Congress used Hunter Biden’s conviction to spin new conspiracy theories rather than reassess their narrative. House Oversight Chairman James Comer called the Delaware trial “a step toward accountability” but accused Justice Department officials of covering for President Biden. Comer reiterated unfounded claims that Joe Biden profited from Hunter’s business dealings in Ukraine and China during his vice presidency, despite a lack of evidence from his committee and the House GOP impeachment probe. House Speaker Mike Johnson echoed this sentiment, vowing continued investigations into the Bidens’ business dealings. Stephen Miller, Trump’s former White House adviser, suggested that the Justice Department showed favoritism toward Hunter by not charging him with more severe crimes and proposed coercing him into testifying against his father. Some GOP reactions were outright bizarre. Georgia Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene speculated baselessly on X (formerly Twitter) that Hunter’s conviction was a plot to balance the scales of justice while ignoring other alleged Biden crimes. The Stakes of November’s Election The contrasting responses to these legal battles underscore the significant stakes of the November election. Princeton University history professor and CNN political analyst Julian Zelizer highlighted that voters must decide what kind of leadership they want in the Oval Office. “Not only is [Joe Biden] saying, the decision is also one that comes from the courts, he’s not saying he’s going to use presidential power to somehow issue a pardon. And you contrast that with the former president who’s attacked the legal system. He’s questioned its legitimacy,” Zelizer stated. He added, “Voters will have to make a choice. What kind of response do they want? And what kind of person do they want in the Oval Office come January of 2025?” Credit: CNN 2024-06-13 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

An inflamatory post has been removed contravening community standards

An off topic history lesson has been removed. There are topics around for that including this one for you to discuss at. Why Did Hamas Attack Israel on Oct 7th 2023 a Historical Perspective

New topic: Blinken Asserts Hamas Holds Key to Ceasefire Plan’s Fate https://aseannow.com/topic/1329542-blinken-asserts-hamas-holds-key-to-ceasefire-plan’s-fate

Rudy Giuliani's mug shot has been released by local officials in Arizona in connection with his indictment on state charges related to the alleged conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election results in the state. The mug shot, released by the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office, marks a significant moment in the ongoing legal saga involving the former New York City mayor and prominent Trump ally. Giuliani, who was served notice of his indictment during a celebration in Palm Beach, Florida, last month honoring his 80th birthday, appeared for booking procedures in Phoenix on Monday. This followed his virtual arraignment on May 21, where he confirmed posting a $10,000 cash bond. Giuliani has pleaded not guilty to the charges. The indictment, issued by a state grand jury in Arizona in April, accuses Giuliani and other aides of former President Donald Trump of conspiracy, fraud, and forgery as part of an effort to overturn President Joe Biden’s electoral victory in the state. Alongside Giuliani, former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and other so-called "fake electors" who supported Trump in 2020 were also charged. Meadows has also pleaded not guilty. In an interview with NBC affiliate KPNX of Phoenix after his court appearance, Giuliani expressed confidence that the case would be dismissed on constitutional grounds. "This is a complete misuse of the criminal process to interfere with the 2024 election," Giuliani stated. When asked if he had any regrets about his actions related to the alleged election interference, Giuliani responded, “Oh, my goodness, no,” adding, “I’m very, very proud of it.” Ted Goodman, a spokesman for Giuliani, defended him in a statement, calling the charges "outlandish" and asserting that Giuliani “will be fully vindicated.” The indictment refers to Trump as “Unindicted Coconspirator 1” but does not charge him. Arizona was one of seven states where alternate electors signed paperwork falsely claiming Trump had won over Biden. This case in Arizona is not Giuliani's only legal battle related to the 2020 election. He also faces charges in Georgia for similar efforts to overturn the election results in that state, where he has likewise pleaded not guilty. Credit: NBC News 2024-06-12 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Switzerland’s President Viola Amherd announced on Monday that nearly 90 countries and organizations, including half from Europe, have confirmed their attendance at the Ukraine peace summit hosted by Switzerland this weekend. However, Russia has declined to participate. The summit, taking place in the scenic Bürgenstock resort overlooking Lake Lucerne in the village of Obbürgen, aims to pave a path towards peace 28 months after Russian forces invaded Ukraine. President Amherd emphasized that the summit is focused on humanitarian aid and fostering dialogue rather than propaganda. "This is not about propaganda," Amherd stated. "This is about the basis of humanitarian aid provided by Switzerland, based on fostering peace (and) to provide a platform to initiate a dialogue." Notably, Moscow was not invited to the summit and has indicated that it would not have attended even if invited, as the conference is based on peace proposals from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, which Russia rejects. High-Level Attendance and Notable Absences The summit will see participation from high-ranking officials and top country leaders. About half of the participants will be represented at the head of state or government level, with a handful from organizations like the United Nations. French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, and U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris are among the expected attendees. Harris will be joined by President Joe Biden's national security adviser, Jake Sullivan, as part of the U.S. delegation. Despite 160 invitations being sent out, fewer than 100 have confirmed their participation in the first phase of the peace process. Key developing countries like Turkey, South Africa, and Brazil have not indicated their attendance. India will participate, but the level of representation is not yet clear. Brazil and China have stated they will not attend unless both sides, including Russia, are present at the table. Swiss officials have acknowledged China's position, noting that Beijing has been a top supporter of Russian President Vladimir Putin since the war began. Foreign Minister Ignazio Cassis mentioned that Switzerland is in frequent contact with Moscow regarding the conference. "The question is not whether Russia will be on board, the question is when," Cassis stated, emphasizing Switzerland's understanding that a peace process cannot proceed without Russian involvement. Ukraine's Diplomatic Push Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is expected to attend the summit and has been actively involved in coordinating the event. Zelenskyy has made a diplomatic effort to attract attendees to the summit while accusing China and Russia of attempting to undermine it. The Swiss-hosted conference follows the recent G7 summit in neighboring Italy. Swiss officials aim to set a course toward "lasting peace" in Ukraine, seeking a "common understanding" and developing a "roadmap" for engaging both sides in talks. The summit’s agenda includes nuclear security, humanitarian aid, and food security. Security Measures Swiss authorities have implemented extensive security measures for the event. As many as 4,000 military personnel will be deployed to provide security, support air transportation, and enhance surveillance. Security fencing and steel wire will be rolled out for the event. Officials noted an increase in cyberattacks leading up to the summit but did not provide specific details. In preparation for the summit, Swiss troops have set up a makeshift heliport in a grassy field below a mountain ridge near the resort, with the sound of cowbells clanging in the background. The Swiss-hosted Ukraine peace summit represents a significant effort to address the ongoing conflict and establish a foundation for lasting peace. While the absence of Russia poses a challenge, the participation of numerous nations and organizations underscores the global community's commitment to seeking a resolution to the crisis. Credit: ABC News 2024-06-12 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Beijing: Four American educators from a small university in Iowa were injured in a stabbing attack on Monday in a public park in northeast China's Jilin province, according to officials from both China and the United States. China's foreign ministry confirmed on Tuesday that the attack appeared to be random and assured that it would not affect the usual exchanges between the US and China. Representative Adam Zabner of Iowa revealed that his brother was among the victims. "My brother, David Zabner, was wounded in the arm during a stabbing attack while visiting a temple in Jilin City, China," Zabner told Reuters. The group was visiting a temple in Beishan Park when they were attacked by a man wielding a knife. "The police have preliminarily judged that this was a random incident, but an investigation is ongoing," said Lin Jian, spokesperson for China’s foreign ministry, during a daily briefing. China's foreign ministry pledged to continue taking effective measures to ensure the safety of outdoor activities. A video showing people lying on the ground in the park, covered in blood, circulated on social media platform X on Monday. However, no trace of these images was found on Chinese social media. Reuters confirmed the location by identifying Chinese characters on a wall, along with the wall's structure and the layout of the path, though the time the video was shot remains unverified. A spokesperson for the US State Department stated via email that they were aware of reports regarding a "stabbing incident" in Jilin, China, and were closely monitoring the situation. The educators from Cornell College were part of a teaching exchange program with Beihua University in Jilin City. Iowa Congress representative Mariannette Miller-Meeks mentioned on X that efforts were being made to ensure the victims received proper medical care and could leave China safely. "We are working through proper channels and requesting to speak with the US Embassy on appropriate matters to ensure that the victims first receive quality care for their injuries and then get out of China in a medically feasible manner," Miller-Meeks wrote. Earlier this year, Chinese President Xi Jinping pledged to invite 50,000 young Americans to China for study programs to enhance people-to-people ties. However, the US State Department maintains a Level 3 travel advisory for China, warning of possible arbitrary detention and exit bans. Currently, fewer than 900 American exchange students are studying in China, compared to over 290,000 Chinese students in the US, according to American data. This incident highlights the unpredictable risks faced by foreign nationals in China and underscores the importance of vigilance and security measures in international educational exchanges. Credit: CNA News 2024-06-12 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In June 2016, Britain voted to leave the European Union, an event that foreshadowed Donald Trump's unexpected election win a few months later. Fast forward to June 2024, and far-right candidates, sharing Trump’s populist nationalism, anti-immigrant stance, and disdain for globalist institutions, have achieved significant gains in European Union elections. This raises the question: could similar political dynamics benefit Trump in the upcoming US elections? While American voters do not directly follow foreign elections, and the US presidential system differs significantly from European parliamentary elections, there are notable parallels. Trump's victory in 2016 was partly due to the weaknesses of Hillary Clinton's campaign, but it also reflected broader populist sentiments similar to those driving the Brexit vote. Now, President Joe Biden faces a comparable challenge. The European elections demonstrated the efficacy of a message that resonates with public anger over migration, economic pain, and the perceived personal costs of climate change policies. Trump is leveraging these themes in critical battleground states. Lessons from Europe: Incumbents and Economic Discontent One key takeaway from the European elections is that incumbents are particularly vulnerable in times of economic hardship. As Biden heads to the G7 summit in Italy, he joins a group of politically weakened Western leaders. French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz have faced setbacks from far-right parties reminiscent of Europe's darker history. Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's low approval ratings suggest he might not lead his party into the next election. British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak is bracing for a significant defeat in the upcoming general election. Interestingly, Italy's right-wing Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, whose party recently saw significant victories, appears to be one of the more secure leaders. However, Biden's situation is somewhat unique. Unlike a traditional race between an insurgent outsider and an unpopular incumbent, Trump carries his own set of challenges. He has a controversial record as a former president, marked by two impeachments and various legal troubles. Despite this, his populist nationalism continues to find an audience. Contrasting Trends and Potential Counterbalances Populist nationalism is not universally ascendant. Biden's Democratic Party had a surprisingly strong performance in the 2022 midterm elections, countering the "Make America Great Again" narrative. The potential return of Britain's Labour Party next month and Poland’s recent rejection of populist rule also suggest that right-wing dominance is not inevitable. In France, Macron's response to the far-right National Rally’s gains was bold: he dissolved Parliament and called for new elections. The National Rally, evolved from the ultra-right-wing National Front, has never won the presidency, but its leader, Marine Le Pen, has moderated some policies to appeal to a broader electorate. Macron is betting that higher voter turnout in legislative elections might reverse the far-right trend. If the National Rally wins, Macron may have to appoint the young far-right leader Jordan Bardella as prime minister, potentially creating a disastrous government that could undermine Le Pen's future presidential ambitions. Macron's gamble is rooted in his belief in the French people's ability to make the right choice for their future. He framed his decision as an act of trust in democracy, similar to Biden's plea to American voters to protect their democracy. Biden reiterated this message during the 80th anniversary of the D-Day landings in Normandy, standing beside Macron. Implications for the US Election The White House will closely monitor the results of the French elections on July 7, viewing them as a potential indicator for the US political climate. The European far-right surge underscores the volatility and unpredictability of current political dynamics. Biden's ability to counter Trump's populist messaging and address voter concerns about the economy, immigration, and climate change will be crucial in the months leading up to the US presidential election. Credit: CNN 2024-06-12 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

The UK Conservative Party is embroiled in a debate over whether Nigel Farage, the leader of the Reform Party, should be allowed to join their ranks. Home Secretary James Cleverly has strongly opposed the idea, likening Farage to a "spoiled child" and dismissing him as a "showman" seeking attention. This stance comes in response to former Home Secretary Suella Braverman's call for the Tories to "embrace" Farage, a suggestion that has sparked significant controversy within the party. Cleverly's rejection of Farage stems from a belief that the latter aims to undermine the Conservative Party. “Nigel’s made it clear he wants to destroy the Conservative Party and I don’t embrace people that want to destroy my party and hurt the British people,” Cleverly stated. He accused Farage of making provocative statements to garner attention, and emphasized that such behavior should not be rewarded. The issue has come to the fore as the Conservatives face the possibility of losing power in the upcoming general election on July 4. Polls indicate a surge in support for the Reform Party since Farage returned as its leader, with some surveys placing the party within two points of the Conservatives. This potential split on the electoral right could significantly benefit the Labour Party, led by Sir Keir Starmer. Farage's recent comments about Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's departure from D-Day commemorations have further fueled the debate. Farage suggested that Sunak “doesn’t understand our culture,” a remark interpreted by some as a veiled reference to the Prime Minister’s race. Farage, however, insisted his critique was aimed at Sunak’s perceived disconnection due to class and privilege. Cleverly dismissed these comments as “nonsense,” defending Sunak’s commitment to honoring veterans over the two-day commemorations. Support for Farage within the Conservative Party is not uniform. While Braverman and former Prime Minister Liz Truss have expressed openness to Farage joining the Tories, other senior figures like Business Secretary Kemi Badenoch oppose his admission. Farage himself has rejected Braverman's invitation "at the moment," though speculation remains about his potential future alignment with the Conservatives, particularly if he is elected to represent Clacton-on-Sea. This internal conflict highlights the broader challenges facing the Conservative Party as it navigates a shifting political landscape. The rise of the Reform Party and Farage’s continued influence pose significant strategic dilemmas for a party already grappling with declining support and the prospect of an electoral defeat. As Cleverly emphasized, the Conservatives are focused on serving the British people, but the question of how to address the Farage factor remains a contentious and unresolved issue within the party’s ranks. Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-06-12 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Gary Lineker, has found himself at the center of yet another controversy following a social media post that condemned Israel's actions in Gaza. This incident has sparked significant backlash, with critics accusing Lineker of violating the BBC’s stringent social media guidelines, particularly given the sensitive timing during the UK election period. The controversy erupted when Lineker shared a post from author James Felton on the social media platform X. Felton's post, made in response to the rescue of four Israeli hostages in central Gaza, included a report accusing Israel of a "massacre" at the Nuseirat refugee camp. Felton wrote, "What kind of f***ed up species can’t look at endless scenes like this and collectively agree what Israel is doing is abhorrent." Lineker shared this post without adding any personal comment. The move quickly provoked a strong reaction. Former Labour minister Lord Austin of Dudley expressed his dismay on the platform, stating, "Four hostages released and this is what Lineker posts. Unbelievable." Although Lineker subsequently deleted the repost, the original tweet remained visible in his Likes column, further fueling the controversy. Lineker, it appears, interpreted the "f***ed up species" phrase as a reference to humanity in general rather than any specific national group. However, to avoid further misinterpretation, he chose to remove the repost while leaving the Like intact. This decision did little to quell the criticism, with a BBC staffer noting, "This repost looks like a clear breach but Gary knows the BBC won’t dare take him off air just before the Euros." The BBC’s social media guidelines, which were revised after a previous incident involving Lineker, permit non-news figures like him more leeway to express political views. However, these guidelines impose stricter rules during election periods, particularly for flagship presenters. These rules stipulate that such presenters must avoid commenting on any issue that is a matter of political debate during the election period. Danny Cohen, a former BBC director of television, was vocal in his criticism. "Gary Lineker has clearly broken the BBC’s strict election guidelines which prevent the corporation’s flagship presenters from expressing opinions on politically contentious subjects during the campaign," Cohen told the i newspaper. He also questioned why Lineker would support a message referring to people with differing views as a "f***ed up species," calling it "very disturbing." Cohen, who has previously accused the BBC of "anti-Israel bias," added, "The BBC’s senior leadership has proven itself unable to control Mr. Lineker. Few in the Jewish community will expect this to change anytime soon." Leo Pearlman, a leading TV producer, echoed Cohen’s sentiments. "Mr. Lineker, in reference to the rescue of four of the Hamas hostages, retweeted the phrase ‘f***ed up species’ in relation to Israel," he said. "Lineker, the highest paid and highest profile BBC presenter, on the eve of the European Championships, continues to take advantage of his bosses’ cowardice." The BBC, approached for comment, did not formally reprimand Lineker but indicated that they "do have conversations with individuals as required." This was not the first time Lineker faced calls for discipline over his social media activity. Previously, he had retweeted an article that called for Israel to be banned from international football tournaments, a post he later deleted. This latest controversy adds to a series of incidents where Lineker's outspoken nature on social media has clashed with the BBC's guidelines. Earlier in the year, when asked if he would adhere to the stricter social media guidelines during election periods, Lineker confidently replied, "I know the guidelines really, really well. I was partly involved in drawing them up." Despite the controversy, Lineker is set to front the BBC’s coverage of Euro 2024, which begins shortly. Given his history of making politically charged comments, Tory sources have indicated that Lineker will be "watched like a hawk" during the tournament, particularly since it coincides with the final three weeks of the UK election campaign. Home Secretary James Cleverly was also critical of Lineker, likening him to a "spoiled child" and a "showman" seeking attention. In an interview with LBC's Andrew Marr, Cleverly dismissed Lineker's comments regarding the D-Day commemorations as "nonsense," stating, "The Prime Minister was at D-Day celebrations over two days. A day in the UK and a day over in Normandy, he met British veterans, spent a huge amount of time with British veterans." He continued, "He said he was wrong to leave that final event, that world leaders’ event, and he has apologized." Cleverly was firm in his stance against Lineker's inclusion in the Conservative Party, despite suggestions from some quarters. "Nigel's made it clear he wants to destroy the Conservative Party and I don’t embrace people that want to destroy my party and hurt the British people," he said, in response to Suella Braverman’s call for Nigel Farage to join the Tories. Earlier in the week, Farage himself had commented on the matter, expressing admiration for Braverman but rejecting the notion of joining the Conservatives "at the moment." Speculation remains that if Farage, currently leading the Reform party, were elected to represent Clacton-on-Sea, he might eventually defect to the Tories depending on the party's future direction. Credit: Inews 2024-06-12 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

A deeply troubling video has surfaced, showing an anti-Israel protester in New York City expressing profoundly hateful sentiments toward Jewish people. The incident took place during an event in Union Square that was meant to honor the hundreds of victims killed by Hamas during the Oct. 7 Nova Music Festival. The footage, shared on the social media platform X by reporter Luke Tress, captures a man shouting vile remarks at a group of Jewish individuals. In the video, the man waves his arm and yells, “I wish Hitler was still here. He would’ve wiped all you out.” This horrifying statement is repeated as tensions escalate between the groups present at the event. The Union Square exhibit was organized to commemorate the victims of the tragic Oct. 7 attacks. However, it also attracted a counter-protest by the pro-Palestinian group, Within Our Lifetime. The counter-protesters included individuals carrying a disturbing banner that read “Long live October 7th,” a reference to the day of the Hamas attacks, which were condemned internationally for their brutality. The incident highlights the intense and often dangerous nature of current political and ethnic conflicts, spilling over into public demonstrations in major cities. The presence of anti-Israel protesters waving a flag associated with Hezbollah, an Iran-backed terrorist group, further underscores the volatile atmosphere. Public reactions to the video have been swift and severe, with many calling for a strong response to such hate speech. The event in Union Square, intended as a solemn tribute, turned into a stark reminder of the deep-seated animosities that can erupt in public spaces. Authorities and community leaders are likely to face increased pressure to address and mitigate such hateful expressions, ensuring that public demonstrations remain peaceful and respectful. The Union Square incident serves as a chilling reminder of the pervasive and dangerous nature of hate speech and its potential to incite violence and deepen societal divides. Credit: NYP 2024-06-12 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Hunter Biden, the son of U.S. President Joe Biden, has been found guilty on all three counts in his high-profile gun trial. The jury in Delaware delivered the verdict after about three hours of deliberation, concluding a week-long trial filled with witness testimonies and substantial evidence. The charges against Hunter Biden stemmed from allegations that he lied about his drug use when purchasing a firearm. Specifically, the counts include making a false statement for the acquisition of a firearm, making a false statement to be recorded in records, and illegal possession of a firearm. These charges collectively carry a maximum sentence of 25 years in prison. Details of the Charges and Trial Hunter Biden's legal troubles began when it was discovered that he had falsely answered a question regarding his drug use on a handgun license application. This deception led to three felony charges. The most severe of these charges is the illegal possession of a firearm by a person who is an unlawful user of or addicted to a controlled substance, which alone could result in a 10-year prison sentence. Throughout the trial, the defense faced significant challenges. Judge Maryellen Noreika was particularly tough on Biden's legal team, often ruling against their requests during evidentiary hearings. According to Dru Stevenson, a professor at South Texas College of Law Houston, there is a “50/50 chance” that Hunter Biden might go to prison. Stevenson noted the judge's strict approach towards the defense as an indication of potential sentencing severity. Hunter Biden's Reaction and Family Support Hunter Biden showed little emotion as the verdicts were read, maintaining a stoic demeanor with his arms folded. After the court session ended, he hugged his attorney, Abbe Lowell, and embraced his wife, Melissa Cohen Biden. His uncle, James Biden, and close family friend, Kevin Morris, were also present in court to support him. In the wake of the guilty verdict, President Joe Biden released a statement emphasizing his dual role as both a father and the President. “I am the President, but I am also a dad,” he stated, expressing unwavering support and love for his son. He reiterated his confidence in Hunter and his respect for the judicial process, affirming that he would not intervene with a presidential pardon. Political Implications and Public Perception While the conviction is undoubtedly a personal blow to President Biden, it is unlikely to have a significant impact on his presidential campaign. Hunter Biden's issues are separate from his father's political career, and there has been no evidence linking President Biden to his son's offenses. Moreover, polling data suggests that the American public is not closely following the trial. The real political challenge may arise from Hunter Biden's upcoming trial in September, where he faces charges of failing to pay $1.4 million in federal income taxes. This trial, occurring just months before the presidential election, could have more profound implications, especially given the ongoing scrutiny of Hunter's foreign business dealings and financial ties to his father. Potential Sentencing Scenarios Despite the severity of the charges, it is possible that Hunter Biden may receive a lighter sentence than the maximum 25 years. Professor Stevenson noted that individuals convicted of similar offenses, especially those involving drug use and firearms, often receive significantly less time. He speculated that for the charge of illegal possession of a firearm, Biden might face around 20 months in prison, rather than the full 10 years. The other charges related to making false statements on firearm acquisition forms typically carry less severe penalties, often reserved for more serious offenders like gun traffickers. Therefore, a probation sentence is also a plausible outcome, given Biden’s efforts at rehabilitation and the judge's potential leniency in sentencing. Conclusion The guilty verdict in Hunter Biden's gun trial marks a significant moment in his ongoing legal battles. While it poses a personal challenge for the Biden family, its impact on the broader political landscape remains uncertain. As the judicial process continues, including the upcoming tax evasion trial, the Biden family will likely remain in the public eye, navigating both personal and political ramifications. President Biden's commitment to respecting the judicial process while supporting his son underscores the complexity of balancing personal and public roles in such high-stakes situations. Credit: BBC 2024-06-12 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken has emphasized that the fate of the Gaza ceasefire plan depends largely on Hamas. Following discussions with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Jerusalem, Blinken noted that Netanyahu reaffirmed his commitment to the ceasefire proposal, which was put forth by President Joe Biden 11 days ago. However, Blinken indicated that the plan's success hinges on Hamas’s response, putting the onus on Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar who has said Hamas will ‘not surrender its guns. However other Hamas leaders expressed "positive signs". In a recent press conference, Blinken expressed optimism over Hamas’s initial response to a UN Security Council resolution that supported President Biden’s ceasefire plan. This resolution recognized Israel’s acceptance of the plan and urged Hamas to follow suit. While Hamas welcomed elements of the resolution, Blinken stressed that a definitive response from the Hamas leadership in Gaza is still lacking. Blinken's comments follow months of confidential ceasefire negotiations, culminating in President Biden’s public announcement of an Israeli "roadmap to an enduring ceasefire and the release of all hostages." The proposed plan involves a six-week initial ceasefire, during which Hamas would release some hostages in exchange for Israel freeing an unspecified number of Palestinian prisoners. A subsequent phase would require Hamas to release the remaining hostages and for Israeli forces to withdraw from Gaza, though the final ceasefire terms would remain subject to further negotiations. Despite Netanyahu’s war cabinet authorizing the plan, he has not publicly endorsed it. The proposal has sparked contention within Netanyahu’s coalition, particularly among far-right ultranationalist ministers who view it as capitulation to Hamas and have threatened to resign if the plan proceeds. Conversely, Hamas is expected to demand clear assurances that the proposal will lead to a full Israeli withdrawal from Gaza and a permanent cessation of hostilities. Thus far, Hamas has not formally responded to the plan. The complexity of the situation is compounded by the fact that the detailed Israeli proposal, reportedly more comprehensive than the summary presented by President Biden, has not been disclosed publicly. This proposal was formulated by Israel’s three-man war cabinet and has faced opposition from some far-right ministers. As part of an extensive diplomatic effort, Blinken’s visit aims to advance the ceasefire proposal. However, significant obstacles remain, and the path to a lasting ceasefire and the resolution of the conflict continues to be fraught with challenges. Related Topics: Biden Announces Israeli Proposal for Lasting Cease-Fire in Gaza US Submits UN Security Council Resolution Supporting Latest Gaza Deal Credit: BBC 2024-06-12 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

An edited video from an unapproved source has been removed

A post and reply have been removed. Please refer to the hostages taken by Hamas by what they are and what the "UN and International bodies refer to them as". Hostages, not captives. Comment on moderation also removed.

A post blatantly over fair use policy has been removed. Another post making inflamatory unsubstantiated claims removed with it. "Any alleged factual claims must be supported by a valid link to an approved credible source."

Jurors in the historic case involving Hunter Biden, the son of U.S. President Joe Biden, have begun their deliberations. The 54-year-old faces charges of lying about his drug use on a federal form when purchasing a firearm in 2018 and illegally possessing the firearm while allegedly being a drug user. The outcome of this case could have significant implications, not just for Hunter Biden but also for the broader political landscape. For several days, prosecutors laid out their case, presenting evidence to suggest that Biden was deep into addiction at the time he bought the gun in Delaware. The prosecution's strategy was to establish that Biden was an active drug user and knowingly lied on the federal form. In contrast, Biden's defense team argued that he was in recovery and therefore truthful when he indicated he was not a drug user on the purchase form. Hunter Biden has denied all three charges and did not take the stand during the trial. If convicted, Hunter Biden could face up to 25 years in prison. The trial has garnered significant public and media attention, not only due to the defendant’s high-profile status but also because of the broader political implications. In his closing argument, prosecutor Leo Wise emphasized that the case should be viewed objectively, stating, "No one is above the law, and this case is no more important or less important because of who the defendant is." Wise asserted that the central issue was whether Hunter Biden was an addict at the time of the purchase and knew it. He pointed to witness testimonies from Biden's former partners and excerpts from Biden's memoir to support the claim that Biden was using drugs around the time he bought the gun. Wise described the evidence as "personal, ugly, and overwhelming." However, the defense team, led by attorney Abbe Lowell, countered that there was no direct evidence of drug use at the specific time of the gun purchase. Lowell argued that the prosecution's case relied heavily on "suspicion" and "conjecture" rather than concrete evidence. He pointed out that none of the text messages or witness testimonies referenced actual drug use at the time of the purchase. Lowell criticized the prosecution for using evidence of drug use spanning many years to make their case. For instance, he highlighted testimony from Biden's ex-girlfriend Zoe Kestan, who reported seeing "no pipes, no scales, no drugs, not even alcohol" during the period in question. Hunter Biden's family, including First Lady Jill Biden, his stepmother, and other close relatives, were present in the Delaware federal court, showing visible reactions to the prosecution's claims. Several family members shook their heads when the prosecution described Biden's alleged "four years of active addiction." During the closing arguments, Hunter Biden often stared intently at the jurors, occasionally taking notes and consulting with his legal team. During breaks, his wife Melissa Cohen Biden provided support, embracing him and offering words of comfort. A key point of contention during the trial was a legal technicality regarding jury instructions. Biden's lawyers requested that jurors be informed that Biden filled out the federal form "in good faith," a point the prosecution contested. This discrepancy centers on whether Biden "knowingly" lied on the form. Last week, prosecutors bolstered their case by playing excerpts from Biden's audiobook, where he discusses his four-year addiction to crack cocaine, a period that overlapped with his gun purchase. Additionally, the court heard from Biden's ex-romantic partners, including Hallie Biden, the widow of Biden's late brother. Hallie testified that she found "remnants" of crack cocaine in Biden's car alongside the firearm, but she also confirmed during cross-examination that she had not seen him using drugs at the time of the gun purchase. Throughout the trial, the defense has worked to undermine the prosecution's witnesses, questioning their recollections and the reliability of their testimonies. The jurors now face the task of weighing this complex and high-stakes evidence to reach a verdict. Credit: BBC 2024-06-11 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Important new UN Security Council Resolution just passed. The world waits on Hamas. New Topics: UN Security Council Approves US-Led Ceasefire Plan for Israel-Gaza Conflict https://aseannow.com/topic/1329442-un-security-council-approves-us-led-ceasefire-plan-for-israel-gaza-conflict/ Genocidal Hamas is Making Peace Impossible https://aseannow.com/topic/1329423-genocidal-hamas-is-making-peace-impossible/ Israeli Forces Rescue Hostages, Held By Al Jazeera & Palestine Chronicle Journalist https://aseannow.com/topic/1329372-israeli-forces-rescue-hostages-held-by-al-jazeera-palestine-chronicle-journalist/

The United Nations Security Council has given its strong backing to a US-proposed ceasefire plan for the Israel-Gaza conflict, voting 14-1 in favor of the resolution. This comprehensive plan sets forth a detailed roadmap designed to bring an end to the hostilities that have ravaged the region and to establish conditions for long-term peace and reconstruction. The resolution, which aims to establish a "full and complete ceasefire," includes several critical components. These encompass the release of hostages held by Hamas, the return of the remains of deceased hostages, and the exchange of Palestinian prisoners. The plan is structured in three phases, each building towards a sustainable peace and a multi-year reconstruction effort for Gaza. The first phase emphasizes a hostage-prisoner swap and a short-term ceasefire. This initial step is seen as crucial for building trust between the conflicting parties and setting the stage for more comprehensive peace measures. The second phase is focused on achieving a permanent end to hostilities. This includes a full withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza, which is considered essential for lasting peace in the region. The text of the US draft resolution clearly outlines this goal, marking a significant step towards de-escalation. The third phase of the plan looks towards the future of Gaza, proposing a multi-year reconstruction plan. This phase is designed to address the extensive destruction that Gaza has endured due to ongoing conflicts, aiming to rebuild the region and improve living conditions for its residents. President Joe Biden had earlier indicated that Israel agreed to the three-phase plan, which aims to bring about a permanent ceasefire in Gaza. Following the Security Council's approval, US Ambassador to the UN, Linda Thomas-Greenfield, expressed her approval, stating, "Today we voted for peace." UK Ambassador Barbara Woodward highlighted the dire situation in Gaza, describing it as "catastrophic" and urging the conflicting parties to take this opportunity to move towards lasting peace. "The suffering has gone on for far too long," Woodward remarked. "We call upon the parties to seize this opportunity and move towards lasting peace which guarantees security and stability for both the Israeli and Palestinian people." The passage of this resolution comes weeks after a similar call for a ceasefire and the immediate release of hostages by the UN Security Council in March. The current resolution builds on these efforts, providing a structured and phased approach to resolving the conflict and addressing the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. President Joe Biden said the Israelis agreed to a three-phase plan that would result in a permanent cease-fire in Gaza. Russia's decision to abstain from the vote was notable, leaving the resolution with 14 votes in favor and no outright opposition. This abstention reflects the complex international dynamics at play, yet it did not hinder the overall support for the plan. The endorsement of this plan by the Security Council marks a significant diplomatic achievement. It represents a concerted effort by the international community to address one of the most protracted and devastating conflicts in the Middle East. The multi-phase approach is designed not only to cease current hostilities but also to lay the groundwork for a sustainable and peaceful future for Gaza and its people. In essence, this resolution is a call to action for both sides of the conflict. It emphasizes the importance of immediate humanitarian relief and sets a framework for long-term peace and reconstruction. The international community, through this resolution, is urging both Israel and Hamas to commit to this plan, release hostages, exchange prisoners, and ultimately work towards a peaceful coexistence. As the implementation of this plan begins, all eyes will be on the region to see how the involved parties respond. The success of this initiative depends on the willingness of both sides to adhere to the outlined steps and the continued support and pressure from the international community. The resolution's passage is a hopeful sign for many who have long awaited peace in the region. It brings a structured approach to ending the violence and provides a clear path towards rebuilding and recovery. The international community, through the UN Security Council, has made a strong statement in favor of peace, security, and the protection of human rights in Gaza and Israel. Credit: BBC 2024-06-11 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Over the weekend, Israeli special forces conducted a daring rescue operation in the central Gaza Strip, successfully freeing four hostages. Three of the hostages—Almog Meir Jan, Andrey Kozlov, and Shlomi Ziv—were being held in the home of Abdallah Aljamal, a Palestinian journalist and member of the Hamas terrorist group, according to the Israeli military. The raid took place in Nuseirat, where soldiers stormed the Aljamal household. Rumors had circulated on social media about the operation, fueled by a post from Ramy Abdu, head of the Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor. Abdu’s post included an image purportedly from the Aljamal home but did not mention the presence of hostages. The Israeli military later confirmed that Aljamal, who had been killed in the raid, was holding the hostages alongside his family. Source Aljamal, a former spokesman for the Hamas-run labor ministry in Gaza, had contributed to various news outlets, including the Palestine Chronicle. During the ongoing war in Gaza, numerous articles by Aljamal were published, even as he allegedly held the hostages. His father, Dr. Ahmed Aljamal, was also killed during the raid. The operation highlighted the complex and dangerous conditions faced by both the hostages and the rescuing forces. Many of Aljamal’s recent stories for the Palestinian Chronicle focused on the ongoing IDF operation in Nuseirat, where his own home was located and where Israeli intelligence had figured out he was holding three of the four hostages rescued on Saturday near a refugee camp. The organization confirmed on Sunday that Aljamal was a contributor reporting on the ground in Gaza, but made no mention that he was holding three hostages. The rescue mission, named "Operation Arnon" in honor of Yamam commander Ch. Insp. Arnon Zmora, who was fatally wounded by Hamas gunfire during the raid, involved simultaneous raids on two buildings in Nuseirat. The fourth hostage, Noa Argamani, was rescued from a nearby building. The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) and the Shin Bet security agency confirmed the presence of hostages in Aljamal's home, denouncing Hamas for using civilian populations as human shields. "This is further proof that the Hamas terrorist organization uses the civilian population as a human shield," the military stated. The IDF acknowledged civilian casualties during the operation but attributed the blame to Hamas for holding hostages in densely populated civilian areas. Source Hamas’s government media office claimed that 274 people were killed during the operation, though this figure remains unverified and does not distinguish between combatants and civilians. IDF Spokesman Daniel Hagari reported fewer than 100 Palestinian casualties, noting uncertainty about the proportion of terrorists among them. Aljamal’s involvement with Hamas and his dual role as a journalist had previously sparked controversy. He had written a column for Al Jazeera in 2019, leading to rumors that he was a correspondent for the Qatari news outlet—a claim that Al Jazeera denied. The hostages had been abducted from the Supernova music festival near the community of Re’im on October 7, when a massive attack by Hamas terrorists resulted in the deaths of 1,200 people and the abduction of 251 hostages. The rescue of Almog Meir Jan, Andrey Kozlov, Shlomi Ziv, and Noa Argamani marks a significant achievement for Israeli forces amidst the ongoing conflict in Gaza. Related Topic: Al Jazeera journalist reportedly moonlights as Hamas commander claims IDF Credit: TOS - NYP - X - 2024-06-11 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In the 1980s and 1990s, I came of age within a Democratic Party and social environment that was unabashedly patriotic. Political liberals of that era often critiqued America's past and present, yet most saw the nation as an imperfect entity striving to meet its high ideals, despite often falling short. The political right, in contrast, seemed dangerously nativist and insufficiently self-reflective. President Bill Clinton, on whose 1992 campaign I worked, famously declared in his first inaugural speech, "There is nothing wrong with America that cannot be cured by what is right with America." This sentiment encapsulated the spirit of young liberals at the time, who embraced a form of American exceptionalism that celebrated pluralism. In my twenties, I proudly wore a T-shirt emblazoned with the American motto e pluribus unum—"out of many, one." This epitomized liberal patriotism. However, this center-left, optimistic narrative of the American experiment has increasingly given way to a harsh critique of American life, a perspective that is rapidly becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy. Today's liberals rarely express patriotic sentiment in public, effectively ceding their civic voice to a far left that holds America in contempt. This shift has led to a politics that is both defeatist in tone and alienating to ordinary Americans. A nation that thinks less of itself will inevitably become less. Mainstream liberals urgently need to rediscover their patriotic spirit. When beloved actress Betty White passed away at 99, my wife began rewatching episodes of The Golden Girls, a mid-1980s sitcom about four aging women navigating their golden years. In one episode, the strong-willed Dorothy lectures her Italian-born mother, Sophia, on the meaning of America. Dorothy reminisces, "When I was a little girl, you told me how much it meant to you when you came here to America for the first time. Do you remember what you thought of when you first saw the Statue of Liberty holding up her torch of freedom? ... Ma, you taught me to love this country. ... You were the first one who put an American flag in my hand." I was struck by how quaint this monologue seemed in today’s cultural context, especially from a show that was at the forefront of social issues like gay rights and sexual harassment. Unfortunately, such overt patriotic sentiment would be considered cringe-worthy in today’s liberal circles. A 2023 Gallup poll found that national pride among Democrats has plummeted over the past two decades. In 2003, 65 percent of Democrats felt "extreme pride" in their country; by 2023, this figure had dropped to 29 percent. Among those aged 18 to 34, only 18 percent expressed extreme patriotism, a steep decline from 85 percent in 2013. Gallup noted, "Party identification remains the greatest demographic differentiator in expressions of national pride, and Republicans have been consistently more likely than Democrats and independents to express pride in being American." On a recent drive through West Virginia, I noticed American flags displayed outside many homes, even in economically depressed coal-mining towns where people could justifiably feel abandoned by their country. Conversely, in my politically blue, economically thriving neighborhood in North Potomac, Maryland, I counted just one American flag in four blocks, unsurprisingly mounted on the doorway of an Eastern European refugee who had fled a repressive Soviet republic. So accustomed had I become to the absence of patriotic sentiment in my area that I found it inspiring when fraternity brothers at UNC Chapel Hill rehoisted the American flag on the campus quad after radical activists had replaced it with a Palestinian flag. The young men locked arms and refused to budge as protestors reportedly hurled bottles, rocks, and insults. Why have liberals become less patriotic? Some blame the election of Donald Trump and persistent economic inequality. Others point to social media echo chambers that, for example, extol a letter from Osama Bin Laden justifying terrorism against the U.S. Additionally, the rise of an oppressed-oppressor ideology portrays America as inherently racist. Indeed, when universities classify statements like "America is the land of opportunity" and "Everyone can succeed in this society" as microaggressions, it is unsurprising that many students develop negative attitudes toward their country. A few Democrats understand that a politics of self-loathing is unsustainable. Maryland Governor Wes Moore and Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro, both elected in 2022, successfully campaigned on liberal policies that emphasized freedom and American exceptionalism. While President Biden may still embody the old flag-waving sensibility, the larger progressive political class that rose to power with him exudes little passion for the country, and Biden's recent demoralizing speech at Morehouse College suggests he has been influenced by this sentiment. In the upcoming elections, it wouldn't be surprising if many ordinary citizens choose churlish nativism over a politics devoid of national pride. Liberals desperately need to reclaim their patriotic spirit. Without it, they risk alienating themselves from the very people they aim to serve and represent. Reaffirming a love for America, despite its flaws, is crucial for fostering a political environment where constructive criticism and national pride coexist. Only then can the Democratic Party hope to inspire and unite the diverse populace it seeks to champion. Hill Opinion Piece Inspired By: The Hill 2024-06-11 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Donald Trump, once a prominent supporter of the COVID-19 vaccine, has transformed into one of the nation's most high-profile critics of immunization mandates. This new anti-vaccine stance could have far-reaching consequences if he wins a second term as president, wielding significant administrative powers. On the campaign trail, Trump has vowed to strip funding from schools with vaccine requirements and has criticized independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as a “fake” anti-vaxxer. This shift, coupled with Trump's previous efforts to expedite the COVID-19 vaccine development during his presidency, presents a complex picture of his evolving views on vaccination. Public health experts warn that a Trump administration opposed to immunization mandates could lead to increased cases of vaccine-preventable diseases like measles and polio, and could undermine efforts to combat future pandemics. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) might reduce or eliminate its vaccine recommendations for children, and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) could impose more stringent safety testing requirements for new vaccines. These actions could severely impact public health infrastructure and policies. Trump's anti-vaccine rhetoric has coincided with an increasing skepticism about vaccines among his supporters. A POLITICO | Morning Consult poll last fall indicated that Republican voters are less likely than Democrats or independents to believe vaccines are safe for children. Trump supporters, in particular, were twice as likely as other Republicans to express doubts about vaccine safety. While Trump's campaign asserts that his threat to defund schools applies only to COVID-19 vaccine mandates, public health experts remain concerned about his broader vaccine policies. Despite Trump and his wife Melania receiving the COVID-19 vaccine and encouraging others to do the same in 2021, the possibility of appointing vaccine-skeptical individuals to key positions remains a significant worry. The CDC and FDA, under a Trump administration, could undergo substantial changes. The CDC might alter the paperwork provided to parents, potentially making vaccines seem less safe, and the FDA could extend the required years of safety testing for new vaccines, thereby delaying their approval. Moreover, Trump might appoint figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. or Florida Surgeon General Joseph Ladapo to top health positions. Both have expressed skepticism about vaccines, with Ladapo even calling for a pause in the use of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines and not encouraging parents to vaccinate their children during a recent measles outbreak. Georges Benjamin, executive director at the American Public Health Association, noted that appointing unqualified individuals to lead health organizations could create significant disruption. "If you want to see an organization not function, put somebody that’s not qualified to be there, or who may have credentials on paper but is not motivated to really do the job in a way that enhances the public’s health," he said. The potential policy changes extend beyond personnel appointments. Trump could influence the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee by appointing vaccine skeptics or dismantling these committees altogether. Such actions would have immediate effects on state laws, many of which follow CDC and ACIP recommendations. A future Trump administration could also leverage financial power to influence vaccine policies. It could withhold funding for programs like the federal Vaccines for Children Program or reduce funding for the CDC's vaccine promotion efforts. Additionally, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) might remove vaccination as a quality measure, and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) could choose not to fund certain types of vaccine research. Trump's rhetoric has already influenced some state and local decisions. For instance, West Virginia's GOP-controlled Legislature voted to remove vaccine requirements for private and parochial school students, though the bill was vetoed by Republican Governor Jim Justice. A school board in the Houston area recently voted to remove vaccine-related sections from science textbooks. Public health experts warn that even if Trump does not implement drastic changes, his rhetoric alone could embolden state and local officials to alter their vaccine policies. "Even if it’s your state legislators who are making the decisions that count, if they see a president elected who holds strong anti-vaccine views, or who appoints anti-vaccine administrators, that tells elected officials at the state and local level, ‘Hey, this president was elected on this platform, this must be something that my constituents also care about,’” said Allison Winnike, director of the Western region for the Network for Public Health Law. This could lead to significant and lasting harm to public health efforts across the country. In summary, Trump's evolving stance on vaccines could have profound implications if he returns to the White House. From altering federal health recommendations to appointing vaccine skeptics to key positions, the potential changes could undermine public trust in vaccines and disrupt efforts to manage vaccine-preventable diseases. As public health experts continue to raise concerns, the political and health landscape remains uncertain, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of the far-reaching consequences of such policies. Credit: Politico 2024-06-11 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

In a significant development amidst the ongoing conflict, Ukraine's military announced on Sunday that it had successfully destroyed one of Russia’s most advanced fighter jets, the Sukhoi Su-57, in a drone strike. This strike targeted a military base deep inside Russia, marking a strategic blow to Russia's aerial capabilities. The Sukhoi Su-57, referred to as the "Felon" by NATO, was reportedly struck while on the tarmac of an airbase located in the Astrakhan region, approximately 600 kilometers (372 miles) behind the front lines of the conflict. Ukraine’s defense intelligence agency (GUR) provided satellite images as evidence to support their claim. These images, shared on GUR’s Telegram channel, showed that the Su-57 was intact on June 7, but by June 8, craters and fire damage were evident near the jet, suggesting the aftermath of the drone strike. The Su-57 is a supersonic, twin-engine, fifth-generation stealth fighter jet, developed by Russia as a counterpart to Western stealth jets such as the US Air Force’s F-22 Raptor. Despite its advanced design, the development of the Su-57 has faced numerous setbacks since it began in 2002. The jet experienced a high-profile crash during a 2019 test flight, and the Russian military only started receiving these aircraft in 2020. Before this, the Su-57 was tested in combat conditions in Syria in 2018. One of the notable features of the Su-57 is its ability to carry Kh-59 and Kh-69 cruise missiles, which allow it to launch attacks from within Russian airspace, posing a significant threat to Ukraine. However, the jet's effectiveness and capabilities have been a subject of debate among experts. While some have cast doubt on its performance compared to Western stealth fighters like the F-22, Russian officials have been vocal in praising the Su-57’s role in their military operations, particularly in Ukraine. Former Defense Minister Sergey Shoigu lauded the aircraft in 2022, stating that it had shown exceptional performance and possessed powerful weaponry. Despite these claims, the exact number of operational Su-57s in the Russian fleet remains unclear. According to Flight Global’s “World Air Forces 2024” directory, there are 14 active Su-57s, with another 62 on order. TASS, a state-run news agency, reported in 2022 that Russian forces were expected to have a total of 22 Su-57s by the end of 2023. The GUR Telegram post emphasized that the Russian Aerospace Forces currently have a limited number of these aircraft in service. The reported destruction of the Su-57 by a Ukrainian drone represents a notable achievement for Kyiv, demonstrating the effectiveness of low-cost drones in neutralizing high-value Russian military assets. The estimated cost of an Su-57 ranges from $35 million to $54 million, making its loss a significant financial blow to Russia. Ukrainian drones have increasingly proven their worth, having previously been used to sink or severely damage Russian warships in the Black Sea and to target tanks and armored vehicles on the battlefield. This incident also underscores a growing concern for Russia regarding the security of its military bases, even those far removed from the front lines. CNN contributor Jill Dougherty noted that this trend of Ukrainian attacks deep inside Russian territory is becoming a significant worry for Moscow. She highlighted that the Ukrainians are effectively taking the battle into Russian territory, which poses a new strategic challenge for Russian defenses. In the wake of the strike, Russian military bloggers have criticized the military’s lack of protective measures for their advanced aircraft. They argued that constructing hangars to shield the Su-57s could have been a cost-effective measure, especially when considering that the price of building protective hangars at every airbase could be equivalent to the cost of a single Su-57. This criticism reflects broader concerns about the Russian military's preparedness and infrastructure. If verified, the destruction of the Su-57 by a Ukrainian drone not only represents a tactical victory for Ukraine but also a strategic challenge for Russia. It highlights the vulnerability of even the most advanced military assets to innovative and low-cost warfare tactics, reshaping the dynamics of the ongoing conflict. Credit: CNN 2024-06-11 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Terrorist leader Yahya Sinwar will continue attacking Israel regardless of the fate of Palestinians. While there was great joy in Israel this weekend at the rescue of four hostages after months in captivity, the whereabouts of a further 116 Jews kidnapped on October 7 remain shrouded in darkness. We do not know how many are alive, nor do we know their condition. Given the way Hamas terrorists raped and tortured Jews when they invaded Israel, it is harrowing to imagine what is happening to these men, women, and children still held against their will. Hamas does not see Jewish people as fully human. Like other violent anti-Semites of the past, this dehumanization permits them to treat Israelis with an animalistic brutality that is painfully hard to comprehend. This was evidenced when a Hamas terrorist excitedly called his family during the October 7 pogrom to share his news: “Hello Dad, I’m talking to you from Mefalsim [a kibbutz in Israel]. Open WhatsApp and see. I killed ten Jews with my own hands. Your son killed Jews! I’m talking to you from a Jewish woman’s phone. I killed her and her husband, their blood on my hands... Hold your head high with pride, Dad.” This mass murderer is one of thousands of Hamas fighters who share a racist and psychopathic mentality. Another terrorist, Amar Abu-Awsha, said during his interrogation after capture: “Our mission was only to kill. We weren’t supposed to capture, just kill. To kill whoever we see and then return. Killing without distinguishing between men, women, and children...Kill anyone you see.” At the heart of this dark vision is Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar, who has been planning these attacks for a decade. He is a genocidal ideologue who believes that Palestinians will eventually annihilate Israel and that everything and anything is justified in the name of Palestinian liberation. Yet the horrible truth is that Sinwar cares nothing for Palestinian lives either. Any amount of sacrifice is acceptable to achieve his goals. Those demonstrating on Britain’s streets and university campuses should ask themselves why Hamas has not used its hundreds of miles of tunnels under Gaza over the last eight months to protect its people from Israeli bombs. The answer is simple: Sinwar does not care if Palestinian men, women, and children die. Indeed, Sinwar welcomes this. He wants his own people to be killed. He can see that many in the West are under the spell of his narrative: that Israel is the oppressor and deserves condemnation. The deaths of Palestinians are an easy price for him to pay to achieve this outcome. It is remarkable how many people in the West have chosen to ignore these brutal dynamics. They do not ask themselves why Hamas terrorists continue to hide in schools, hospitals, and UN facilities. They do not seem to notice that Hamas has done nothing to protect its own people. As they raise their Palestinian flags and spread toxic anti-Semitic hate on social media, they utterly fail to recognize that Hamas, as the government of Gaza, enjoyed widespread popular support and has a history of summarily executing opponents, subjugating women, and hunting down gay people. The obvious but often overlooked truth is that the pressure to end the war should be focused firmly on Hamas. By returning the hostages and giving up their terrorist arsenal, they could end the war tomorrow and bring long-term respite to innocent Palestinian civilians. But talking to experts over the last few days, it has become clear to me that Sinwar is in no rush for a ceasefire. He does not care if more buildings in Gaza are destroyed. He is quite content for more Palestinians to die. Sinwar is somewhere in the tunnels of Gaza, surrounded by Jewish hostages being used as human shields, watching as the world condemns Israel and fails to see that Hamas began this war and could quickly end it. The UK Government, EU leaders, and President Biden must urgently adjust their focus, both publicly and diplomatically. They must understand that Yahya Sinwar is in no hurry to agree to ceasefire terms and end the war. They must ramp up the pressure on Hamas in the strongest terms via leaders in Qatar and Egypt who have a direct link to Sinwar. They must shut down this genocidal monster’s options and provide no rewards for the terrorist massacres of October 7. Only then will this war end and people on both sides begin to heal. Opinion - Danny Cohen was the director of BBC Television from 2013 - 2015 Credit: Daily Telegraph 2024-06-11 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe

Former President Donald Trump is set to virtually attend a pre-sentencing probation interview following his conviction in the New York hush-money trial. The interview, which will be conducted by a female New York probation officer, is expected to take place from Trump's Mar-a-Lago home in Palm Beach, Florida, using a specially secured virtual network instead of the more common Zoom platform. This arrangement is unusual as pre-sentencing interviews are typically conducted in person, though the virtual format in this case has been adopted for security reasons. The purpose of pre-sentencing interviews is to provide the judge with additional insight and information before determining the sentence. Although these interviews are routine for those convicted of state and federal crimes, it is highly irregular for them to be conducted via video conference. Additionally, Judge Juan Merchan, who is overseeing the case, signed an order permitting Trump’s defense attorney, Todd Blanche, to be present during the interview. This too is an anomaly, as these interviews are usually conducted without the presence of the defendant's lawyers. Judge Merchan will review the interview before sentencing Trump on July 11. This date falls just days before the Republican National Convention, where Trump is expected to be officially named as the GOP candidate to run against Democratic President Joe Biden in the upcoming general election. Despite facing a potential sentence of up to four years in prison, most legal experts predict that Trump will receive probation, considering his lack of previous criminal records and other mitigating factors such as his age. In the lead-up to his sentencing, Trump has maintained a defiant stance, vowing to appeal the conviction and calling for intervention by the U.S. Supreme Court. Steven Cheung, Trump’s campaign spokesman, reiterated this determination in a statement, asserting that Trump and his legal team are taking necessary steps to challenge the Manhattan district attorney's case. Last month, a Manhattan jury found Trump guilty on 34 counts of falsifying business records. The charges stem from efforts to cover up hush-money payments made to adult film actress Stormy Daniels during the 2016 election campaign. The payments were intended to suppress allegations that could have harmed Trump's chances of winning the presidency. Credit: UPI 2024-06-11 Get our Daily Newsletter - Click HERE to subscribe