Social Media

Two teenage boys from Ottawa were reportedly planning to bomb a pro-Israel rally on Parliament Hill, according to documents obtained by Global News. The two, who are both minors, were arrested by the RCMP in December and February on allegations of plotting an attack against Ottawa’s Jewish community. Though the specific details of the plan weren’t initially disclosed, recent court documents outline new allegations regarding the suspected target. “They are alleged to have formed a plan last fall to violently attack Jewish persons in Ottawa, possibly through the detonation of an explosive device at a pro-Israel rally,” stated the Department of Justice. One of the teens allegedly possessed acetone, oxidizer, and metal ball bearings—all of which are common in the construction of homemade bombs. The plot was reportedly linked to ISIS, also known as DAESH, and according to Canada’s Integrated Terrorism Assessment Centre, it may have been “possibly accelerated” by the Hamas attack on Israel in October 2023. The Department of Justice noted that, while the radicalization of the two teens likely began before the recent Hamas-Israel conflict, one of them reportedly had contact with DAESH overseas. This period also saw increased calls to violence by DAESH in response to the escalating conflict. The claim that a pro-Israel rally was the intended target came up in an application from federal lawyers seeking to withhold sensitive national security information in the teens’ trials. This case highlights a disturbing rise in antisemitic incidents in Canada, including recent shootings targeting Jewish schools. In addition, there has been an uptick in ISIS-related cases, such as the recent arrest of a Pakistani foreign student in Quebec accused of planning a mass shooting at a Jewish center in Brooklyn, New York. Shimon Koffler Fogel, president and CEO of the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs, told Global News he was unaware of the rally as a target but was not surprised. “It doesn’t come as a surprise,” Fogel said. “And I think it’s consistent with what we have seen across the country, where the violent and radicalized protests that have manifested themselves on our streets are losing all constraints in terms of how far they are prepared to go in order to advance their position.” Fogel expressed disappointment with Canadian law enforcement’s handling of the threats faced by the Jewish community, saying, “They understand the extent to which we are under threat, yet they are not taking all the steps necessary. They are not using the provisions of the Criminal Code in ways that are going to offer protection to those who are at risk.” The father of one of the accused teens, who immigrated from Iraq, claimed the family had warned him to avoid extremist influences and had even arranged for him to meet with an imam. However, posts on the father’s Facebook account reportedly include derogatory references to Jews and Zionists, with one post expressing a desire to eliminate all Israelis. Meanwhile, the co-accused faces charges that include three counts of terrorism, agreeing to commit murder, and attempting to obtain a prohibited firearm. In a report released under the Access to Information Act, the Integrated Terrorism Assessment Centre stated, “The plot involved a reported threat to the Jewish community, which exemplifies how significant international events, amongst other personal grievances, can likely influence an overall path of mobilization.” Based on a report by Global News Canada 2024-11-12

Following a sharp ratings dip during last week’s Election Night coverage, CNN is bracing for sweeping layoffs under new CEO Mark Thompson, who is reportedly targeting high-salaried on-air talent and redundant positions across the organization. According to Puck News, Thompson’s planned layoffs are expected to impact hundreds of CNN employees as he restructures the network’s workforce, focusing on a shift toward a “digital-first” model. CNN has struggled to keep pace with competitors in the cable news arena. While Fox News captured an impressive 10.3 million viewers in prime time on Election Night and MSNBC, anchored by Rachel Maddow, pulled in 6 million viewers, CNN lagged with 5.1 million viewers, according to Nielsen. This marked a significant loss for CNN, which historically dominated election coverage in years past. As part of the reorganization, Thompson may cut back on the network’s highly compensated anchors, such as Anderson Cooper, Erin Burnett, and Kaitlan Collins. Cooper, who hosted the recent Election Night broadcast, is reported to have a contract valued as high as $20 million annually. Burnett’s salary is estimated at $6 million, while Collins earns a reported $3 million. Thompson’s push for budget restructuring could see significant reductions in these salaries as he works to align the network’s finances with a shifting viewership and digital landscape. Further signs of the coming change were evident earlier this week when anchor Chris Wallace announced his departure from CNN, ending a three-year run marked by low ratings and corporate turnover. Wallace, reportedly earning $8.5 million annually, is one of several high-profile figures Thompson has considered asking to accept pay cuts. Additional stars, including Jake Tapper and Wolf Blitzer, may also face compensation adjustments. Thompson, previously the CEO of The New York Times and the BBC, is focusing on adapting CNN’s content production for a more digitally-focused audience. According to sources, the layoffs will target television production teams whose roles are deemed less critical under the new digital-first approach. Reporters and correspondents are expected to take on some of the responsibilities currently handled by producers and production assistants, streamlining workflows and reducing the network’s reliance on traditional television support staff. Additionally, CNN will eliminate redundant roles and, in some cases, reduce or fully dissolve certain divisions. The upcoming changes follow an earlier round of cuts in which CNN laid off approximately 100 employees, or about 3% of its workforce. For many at CNN, these layoffs only add to the anxiety within a work environment described by Puck as “high stress and high anxiety.” The reshuffling at CNN underscores a larger industry trend as media companies face the pressures of declining viewership, changing consumer habits, and the need for cost-effective digital strategies. In a competitive field where audiences have increasingly diverse options for news and information, Thompson’s restructuring efforts aim to give CNN a fighting chance to recover and remain relevant in the evolving landscape of news media. Based on a report by NYP 2024-11-14

A disturbing scene unfolded outside a community theater in Livingston County, Michigan, where demonstrators carrying Nazi flags gathered in protest during a performance of *The Diary of Anne Frank*. The antisemitic demonstration took place outside the American Legion Post 141 in Howell, where the play was being staged, and involved masked individuals who reportedly waved Nazi flags and shouted hateful, racist slurs, according to WXYZ, a CNN affiliate. In addition to Howell, demonstrators were also reported in the nearby town of Fowlerville. Alex Sutliff, who witnessed the scene while driving through Fowlerville with his wife, encountered the group at a stoplight and was shocked by their behavior. “They were saying awful antisemitic things that I don’t even feel comfortable repeating myself,” Sutliff shared with CNN. He described how the group “all stuck their hands up” while chanting “Heil Hitler, Heil Trump.” Sutliff quickly left as the light turned green, calling the police to report the incident as he and his wife circled back to alert the demonstrators that authorities were on their way. Upon hearing this, the demonstrators dispersed, leaving before the police arrived. The incident has sparked concerns among both local residents and the theater group itself. The Fowlerville Community Theatre, responsible for the production, issued a statement acknowledging that the play is intended to reflect the real experiences of those who suffered in the Holocaust. The group emphasized their commitment to portraying these stories with authenticity, adding that the protest outside brought an unexpected element of realism to the production. “On Saturday evening, things became more real than we expected,” the statement read, describing how the presence of the demonstrators offered “a small glimpse of the fear and uncertainty felt by those in hiding.” The theater group also expressed hope that by sharing Anne Frank’s story, they might contribute to preventing such atrocities from recurring. “As a theatre, we want to make people feel and think,” the statement continued. In response to the protest, the Anti-Defamation League’s Michigan regional office condemned the actions, expressing outrage on social media. The ADL described the demonstration as “disgusting,” particularly in light of the way these extremists openly celebrated symbols of hatred. This incident follows other recent acts of hate in Livingston County; just a few months earlier, White supremacist groups staged a march in Howell, located about 40 miles from Detroit. Amid a broader rise in antisemitic incidents, the ADL reported a significant spike in threats against Jews in the U.S., noting a threefold increase in the year since the October 7 attack on Israel by Hamas. This increase is part of a larger trend, with a surge in hate crimes targeting Jews, Muslims, and Arabs in the weeks following the attack. For this Michigan community, the demonstration serves as a sobering reminder of the need for vigilance against hatred. The theater company, undeterred, remains committed to bringing the stories of Holocaust victims to the stage, hoping that empathy and awareness can be kindled even in the face of such adversity. Based on a report by CNN 2024-11-14

In the wake of Donald Trump’s recent election as president, a surge in sexist attacks targeting women has flooded social media, as reported by the Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD), a think tank based in London. These attacks, which include misogynistic comments and hate speech, intensified following a viral post by white nationalist Nick Fuentes on X, formerly Twitter. Fuentes’ message, “Your body, my choice. Forever,” a provocative twist on the reproductive rights slogan “my body, my choice,” quickly became a rallying cry for right-wing men disparaging women on social media. The slogan gained traction particularly in response to posts by women expressing disappointment in the election results. According to the ISD’s analysis, Fuentes’ slogan was referenced thousands of times daily across social media platforms in the week following the election. The number of mentions peaked at over 12,000 on Friday. The report documented a staggering 4,600% spike in the phrases “your body, my choice” and “get back in the kitchen” on X within a 24-hour period late last week. Beyond social media, the report also notes offline harassment, including reports of young boys echoing the misogynistic phrase on school campuses. Merchandise with “Your body, my choice” emblazoned on hats and T-shirts also began appearing on e-commerce sites. ISD’s U.S. director of technology, Isabelle Frances-Wright, co-authored the report and commented on the alarming trend in an email statement, explaining that this phenomenon illustrates how influential online figures can sway not only digital discourse but also real-life behavior, particularly among young men. “One of the alarming characteristics of this trend is how quickly online influencers, known for propagating hate, can influence both online and offline behaviors, most especially the behaviors of young men,” Frances-Wright stated. The recent rise in gender-based vitriol reflects a broader trend of hateful rhetoric following Trump’s election victory, including instances of racist harassment. The report cites cases in which Black Americans received texts containing racial slurs, including messages that read they had been “chosen to pick cotton ‘at the nearest plantation.’” The FBI and other law enforcement agencies are investigating these texts, though their sources and motivations remain unclear. Gender dynamics played a significant role in the recent election, largely due to Vice President Kamala Harris’s presidential campaign, which prioritized reproductive rights—a key issue for women voters. Pre-election polls showed a significant gender gap between the candidates, with Trump and his supporters frequently targeting Harris with misogynistic language. Trump himself made disparaging remarks in July, claiming that world leaders would view Harris “like a play toy” based on her appearance. Allies of Trump also suggested that her rise in politics was simply a product of diversity, equity, and inclusion policies. An ad from Elon Musk’s America PAC, since deleted, went as far as calling Harris the C-word and labeling her a “Communist.” As these attacks proliferate online, they reveal an intensifying trend in digital hate speech, raising concerns about the implications of social media as a platform for divisive and harmful rhetoric. Based on a report by NBC 2024-11-14

A serving Gloucestershire police officer has been arrested in Gloucester on suspicion of a terrorism-related offence, reportedly due to suspected online support for the proscribed organization Hamas. The constable, a man in his 30s, was detained by counter-terrorism officers on Tuesday under the Terrorism Act, specifically on suspicion of offering support to the designated terrorist organization. Gloucestershire Constabulary has confirmed that the alleged support centers on the officer’s online activities. Hamas, an Islamist militant group based in Gaza, is designated as a terrorist organization in the UK, the European Union, the United States, and numerous other countries. This designation makes it illegal to show support for or be affiliated with the group within the UK. The organization has been involved in an ongoing conflict with Israel, which intensified significantly following a major attack on October 7 of last year. Following the arrest, specialist officers launched searches as part of the ongoing investigation, focusing on securing digital evidence, including seizing devices and conducting searches of a vehicle and an associated residence. Assistant Chief Constable Arman Mathieson of Gloucestershire Constabulary addressed community concerns over the arrest, acknowledging the gravity of the allegations. He emphasized, however, that the investigation remains in its early stages and that the public should avoid premature conclusions. Mathieson explained that the primary aim of the searches is to gather relevant digital devices for analysis, underscoring that the arrest facilitates a “prompt and effective” inquiry into the matter. The Gloucestershire police remain focused on conducting a thorough investigation while reassuring the public that any potential misconduct will be rigorously addressed. Based on a report by Sky News 2024-11-15

For those looking to get away from U.S. politics over the next four years, Villa Vie Residences has introduced the Tour La Vie program, a residential cruise that allows participants to travel the world while avoiding life back home. Through this program, travelers have the chance to explore over 140 countries and skip any unwanted political atmosphere at home. The program's inspiration, according to Mikael Petterson, CEO of Villa Vie Residences, came from the general tension in the political climate rather than specific election outcomes. “We came up with this marketing campaign before we even knew who would win. Regardless of who would have won, you would have half of the population upset,” Petterson told *Newsweek.* “Quite frankly, we don't have a political view one way or the other. We just wanted to give people who feel threatened to have a way to get out.” The Tour La Vie program offers a range of flexible packages to cater to different timelines. The annual "Escape from Reality" option costs nearly $40,000, while the four-year “Skip Forward” package for the duration of a presidential term costs $256,000 for single travelers or $320,000 for two. Those wanting shorter getaways can choose two- or three-year packages under options like "Mid-term Selection" and "Everywhere but Home." For those looking at a year-long cruise, the cost is approximately $80,000 for single travelers or $50,000 per person when shared. Announcing the cruise led to an immediate surge in interest, Petterson said, noting a significant increase in calls and inquiries. Since Villa Vie typically sees a two- to three-week lead time for bookings, it’s expected that the company will soon know how quickly the cruise fills up. Offering up to 650 spots, the ship will visit 425 ports worldwide, providing an abundance of adventures for its residents. With an itinerary that includes a month in the Caribbean and a four-month journey around South America, travelers can look forward to two Panama Canal transits, explorations of the Chilean Fjords, a close-up view of Antarctica, Carnival in Rio, and even an Amazon River cruise. Though Tour La Vie is geared toward long-term exploration, travelers can still stay connected to home. Thanks to mail services routed through the corporate office to the ship, residents can maintain voting rights, ensuring that even those away for the 2028 elections can still cast their ballots. According to Petterson, the cruise primarily attracts three groups: retirees, some as old as 92; semi-retired individuals; and younger digital nomads. As the Villa Vie Odyssey embarks on the second month of its ambitious 15-year voyage, it promises to take residents to all seven continents, 13 World Wonders, and over 100 tropical islands. The all-inclusive package covers meals, drinks, a free first medical consultation, and bi-weekly housekeeping. There’s high-speed internet as well, enabling residents to stay in touch with friends and family, who can also join the cruise for $129 a day. "I think the world cruising market is growing and growing,” Petterson remarked, emphasizing the appeal of this unique lifestyle. “Having the ability to completely disconnect from the world and still be connected with our internet and Wi-Fi and invite your friends on board… It really helps your ability to really live this lifestyle and still stay connected with your friends and family." Based on a report by Newsweek 2024-11-14

The Conservative Party has edged ahead of Labour in the latest voter opinion poll, showing a shift in public support following the appointment of Kemi Badenoch as party leader. According to a survey by the research group More in Common, the Conservatives now hold a two-point lead, with 29% of voters supporting them compared to Labour’s 27%—their strongest lead since Labour’s sweeping general election win in July. This survey positions Reform UK in third place with 19%, followed by the Liberal Democrats with 11%, and the Greens with 8%. A previous poll by BMG Research at the end of October had also shown the Conservatives slightly ahead, suggesting that recent changes in the political landscape have impacted public opinion. One of the main reasons for this shift appears to be the sharp drop in Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s popularity. Since its peak in early August, his approval rating has declined by nearly 40 points. In contrast, Badenoch holds a net approval rating of -3, significantly higher than Starmer’s -25, although many voters still report being unfamiliar with her leadership style and approach. Some of Labour's recent policy choices may also be contributing to this decline. Polling experts cite controversies such as the party’s decision to cut the winter fuel allowance and debates over the distribution of “freebies” as factors undermining Labour’s standing with voters. One of Labour’s most criticized proposals—the plan to impose inheritance tax on farmland valued at over £1 million—has stirred widespread disapproval, with nearly six in 10 voters opposing the measure, according to More in Common. These issues seem to be chipping away at Labour's initial support, allowing the Conservatives to regain ground. Luke Tryl, UK director of More in Common, attributes Labour's recent drop in popularity to what he describes as perceived “missteps” by the party. He notes that Badenoch’s leadership has encouraged voters to envision a viable alternative, thus benefiting the Conservatives. “We know that things like the cuts to the winter fuel allowance had an impact on [Labour’s] standing, similar to the row over freebies. That’s now translating into a boost for the Tories because they now have a leader. There’s a leader people can imagine voting for,” Tryl explained. This perception of a fresh start under Badenoch appears to have spurred a positive shift in voter sentiment toward the Conservatives. Reflecting on the impact of Badenoch’s appointment, Tryl highlighted that her leadership has allowed the party to distinguish itself from its previous administration. For comparison, Rishi Sunak, the outgoing prime minister, had a net approval rating of -35 when he resigned. Badenoch’s perceived difference from past leadership has helped shape the Tories' improved polling performance. Tryl also commented on the broader political environment, noting that voters today are more volatile and less inclined to give extended "honeymoon periods" to new leaders. “People think there’s been mistakes. We have a much more volatile electorate, and people are impatient. The era of long honeymoons is over,” he remarked. This heightened scrutiny on leadership changes means that while Labour initially enjoyed strong support, Badenoch’s fresh approach and Labour's recent setbacks have shifted the balance back toward the Conservatives. Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2024-11-14

President-elect Donald Trump has announced former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee as his nominee for U.S. ambassador to Israel, a choice that signals a potential shift in American policy toward a more pro-settlement stance. Huckabee, a longtime ally of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, has consistently voiced support for Israeli settlers and has even backed the possibility of Israel annexing parts of the occupied West Bank. Huckabee’s relationship with Netanyahu and his outspoken support for settlements are significant, especially given Israel’s current pro-settler government. Some within the Israeli right-wing are now optimistic that Trump’s upcoming administration may be the most pro-settler U.S. administration in history, amplifying support for policies that favor expansion in the West Bank. Trump's own perspective is echoed in his endorsement, where he remarked, “Mike Huckabee loves Israel and the people of Israel... he will work tirelessly to bring about peace in the Middle East.” Huckabee’s commitment to Israel and his views on the West Bank are well-documented. In 2015, he controversially asserted that Israel’s historical connection to the West Bank is stronger than that of the United States to Manhattan. Four years later, Huckabee went on to declare that he believed Israel had the right to annex parts of the West Bank. His views on Palestinian statehood have also been clear for over a decade; during his 2008 presidential campaign, Huckabee stated, “there’s really no such thing as a Palestinian” and argued that if there were to be a Palestinian state, it should be established within the borders of other Arab nations rather than Israel. Netanyahu’s own stance on annexation has evolved over time, particularly under the Trump administration’s previous term. Toward the end of Trump’s first term, Netanyahu considered declaring the annexation of parts of the West Bank but ultimately did not align with Trump’s team on the matter. Now, with Huckabee’s potential ambassadorship, some right-wing members of Netanyahu’s government are reigniting calls for annexation following Trump’s victory. Yet annexing West Bank settlements would be a contentious move, widely viewed as illegal under international law, and would likely trigger global condemnation. This step could also further obstruct any potential pathway to a Palestinian state, as international bodies largely view Israeli settlements as a critical barrier to a two-state solution. The implications of Huckabee’s nomination are complex, as Trump has not yet clarified his administration’s full approach to Israeli-Palestinian relations, particularly concerning settlement expansion and annexation. Nevertheless, Huckabee’s alignment with Israeli settlement interests points toward a U.S. policy that may be more openly supportive of pro-settlement initiatives, potentially reshaping U.S.-Israel relations and altering the course of Middle Eastern diplomacy. Based on a report by AXIOS 2024-11-14

Special Counsel Jack Smith is reportedly planning to retire before President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration in January, effectively sidestepping any immediate attempts by the incoming president to remove him from office. This early retirement would prevent Trump, who has vowed to “fire” Smith within “two seconds” of taking the oath of office, from taking direct action against the man responsible for leading high-profile investigations against him. Smith, whose work has focused on federal criminal cases tied to Trump’s alleged attempts to overturn the results of the 2020 election and his handling of classified documents, is aiming to conclude his cases ahead of Trump’s anticipated return to the presidency on January 20, 2025. According to sources cited by the New York Times, Smith’s choice to retire ahead of Trump’s inauguration aligns with his commitment to complete his prosecutorial responsibilities while avoiding direct confrontation with the next administration. This decision highlights the longstanding Department of Justice policy of avoiding the prosecution of a sitting president, a principle that has shaped Smith’s timeline. DOJ officials reportedly believe that pursuing charges against a sitting president would be both legally and practically challenging, given the power of the executive office. Therefore, as Trump’s presidency looms, the DOJ appears ready to wrap up its pursuits to ensure that any remaining cases can be handled without direct presidential interference. Smith’s proactive departure reflects the broader strategy among federal prosecutors and officials who anticipate Trump’s potential moves to dismiss or undermine those involved in any criminal cases against him. Trump’s statement that he would waste no time firing the special counsel underscores his discontent with Smith’s investigations and hints at his likely approach to handling those in government positions linked to actions against him. By retiring before the presidential handover, Smith not only completes his work on his own terms but also reinforces a protective boundary against political retribution. The decision ultimately highlights the tension between presidential power and the Department of Justice’s mission of upholding the rule of law. For Smith, retiring early becomes both a professional safeguard and a message of independence, signaling that his work concludes on his own timeline and not at the behest of the new administration. Based on a report by NYP 2024-11-12

The news that President-elect Donald Trump would select Representative Elise Stefanik as ambassador to the United Nations sparked intense reactions at the UN, with diplomats reeling at the prospect. Stefanik, a Republican from New York, is widely recognized as a strong advocate for Trump’s America First policy and someone who could tackle the persistent anti-Americanism and antisemitism that pervades the UN system. Stefanik’s initial task will focus on the UN Security Council, where the United States, as a permanent member, possesses both veto power and the authority to call special sessions. Her approach is expected to differ from that of the Biden administration, which often hesitated to wield its veto, considering its use a failure in diplomacy. This reluctance placed the United States on the defensive, while nations like Russia and China, unafraid to exercise their veto power, pushed their agendas forward. With Stefanik in the role, the US is likely to embrace a more assertive approach, prepared to veto proposals that threaten American interests. In this adversarial environment, Stefanik’s strategy may go beyond defense. She could leverage her convening power to take a proactive stance, introducing resolutions that put pressure on nations antagonistic to the United States. Both Trump and his reported pick for secretary of state, Senator Marco Rubio, are likely to see Stefanik as the central figure in their political opposition to America’s adversaries. Stefanik’s work could involve highlighting the malign activities of countries such as China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea. Through strategically introduced resolutions, she might force China and Russia to openly veto measures that expose their activities and those of their allies. For example, instead of waiting to block yet another anti-Israel resolution, Stefanik could propose designating Hamas as a terrorist organization. This move would force Beijing and Moscow to use their veto power in defense of a terrorist group. Stefanik’s strategy could also extend to exposing Iranian-linked groups, such as the Houthis, who have launched attacks on international shipping in the Red Sea, as well as addressing crimes against humanity committed by China and Russia. Should Trump resume his “maximum pressure” campaign against Iran, Stefanik would be pivotal in pushing for the United Kingdom, France, and Germany to join the United States in reactivating multilateral sanctions on Iran. Triggering the “snapback” of these sanctions before their expiration would reinstate UN embargoes on Iran’s conventional and missile capabilities and reestablish the prohibition against nuclear enrichment, all while circumventing potential Russian or Chinese vetoes. Another significant aspect of Stefanik’s agenda could be the strategic use of American financial contributions across the UN to counter Chinese influence, reduce antisemitism, and ensure that funding does not inadvertently support terrorist organizations. Based on a report by NYP 2024-11-14

Inflammatory off topic troll post removed @pattayasan

Troll post removed @blaze master read the credible links provided in the topic

Post promoting violence against Jews has been remove, another one of those and the poster will also be removed

Another off topic post and video removed @BruceWayne

The topic here is: Israelis in Thailand on Alert After Security Warning Not about Amsterdam

Off topic trolling memes removed along with off topic unsubstaniated claims @pattayasan Jewish Youth Football Team in Berlin Attacked by Knife-Wielding pro-Palestinian Mob

Friendships between people of different generations are surprisingly common and come with a range of hidden benefits. While society often focuses on the intrigue surrounding age-gap romantic relationships, particularly those involving celebrities like Leonardo DiCaprio, Aaron Taylor-Johnson, or Brad Pitt, friendships across age divides are quietly fostering understanding and support in everyday life. In fact, almost four in 10 adults report having close friends from a different generation, with over half of Britons stating they have at least one friend who is ten years older or younger, according to a YouGov survey. These age-gap friendships are proving to be impactful, helping people combat loneliness, gain new perspectives, and even improve overall well-being. Though some friendships across generations form in unique ways, workplaces are a common catalyst for these connections. Social psychologist Dr. Libby Drury explains that offices are often “fertile places” for people to connect with those older or younger than themselves, as people from diverse age groups are regularly brought together. According to Dr. Drury, “There’s still so much ageism that is accepted within our society but the diverse friendships in the office often have benefits beyond the workplace. It can make you more open-minded and tolerant of other people.” This openness to forming bonds across generational lines can encourage tolerance and broaden perspectives, as different viewpoints come together. Katie Jenkins, for instance, was a 23-year-old trainee journalist when she met Angus, her 51-year-old editor. Jenkins recalls initially finding Angus intimidating, describing him as a "gruff, no-nonsense Kiwi and the biggest grammar pedant I’d ever met." However, as they worked together, Angus transformed from mentor to friend, challenging Jenkins' first impressions. She describes him as one of the most caring, selfless people she knows, always quick to lend a hand in ways her younger friends might not think to. "All I have to do is lament something inconsequential like brittle nails, and Angus will appear with a cream that might help,” she says. "One time I was complaining about the enormous rose bush in our garden and he turned up with a pair of shears and helped me prune the damn thing. Friends my own age show love by buying cocktails; Angus shows it by trimming a garden hedge.” Jenkins’s friendship with Angus grew stronger not in spite of their age difference but because of the unique support and perspective he brings. “I’m not friends with Angus because of his age, but I’m glad I wasn’t deterred by it,” she reflects. Beyond the emotional support they provide, age-gap friendships are beneficial for mental and physical health, especially for younger people. Dr. Drury highlights that younger individuals who connect with older friends are less likely to believe that competence inevitably declines with age, a belief that can be damaging if internalized. Known as "stereotype embodiment theory," this concept suggests that adopting negative stereotypes about aging can lead to a self-fulfilling prophecy, where younger people eventually embody these stereotypes in their own later years. The presence of older friends can challenge these beliefs, offering a broader view of what aging looks like and reducing anxieties tied to it. Age-gap friendships are equally advantageous for older individuals, who experience enhanced happiness and even longer lives from these connections. Studies show that older adults with friends at least ten years younger feel happier and more energetic as time goes by. This mutual exchange of companionship and perspective can foster a sense of vitality for both people, while also strengthening ties across the generations. Even with the natural “generation wars” that sometimes arise—whether it's over emojis, fashion, or work habits—friendships across age lines bridge generational gaps. Differences between Boomers, Millennials, and Gen Zs in preferences and lifestyles often spark debates, but these friendships remind us of the importance of openness and connection. With a willingness to understand one another, people of all ages can find common ground and enjoy meaningful friendships that defy stereotypes. Based on a report by the Independent 2024-11-13

Starting in January, parents sending children to nurseries attached to private schools will be required to pay VAT if the nursery classes are not "wholly, or almost wholly" made up of children under the compulsory school age. This measure targets classes where 90% of children are expected to be under five to avoid VAT charges. Laura Trott, the Shadow Education Secretary, has criticized the move, accusing Labour of being “blinded by class warfare,” suggesting that the policy is unfairly targeting families who choose private nurseries, leading to higher costs for parents as nurseries absorb the added tax burden. According to Trott, this tax change is likely to drive up nursery fees. “With a number of nurseries now set to face a higher tax bill, it is inevitable that parents will end up paying the price through higher fees,” she said. The concern centers on parents who could see increased nursery costs as a result, particularly for families with children born between April and August, as these children may wait up to five months before joining primary school, depending on their birthdate. For these families, the timing of school entry can affect whether they are subject to VAT or not. Despite this opposition, the government maintains that most nursery classes will not be impacted. A government spokesperson clarified that "the vast majority of nursery classes will not be subject to VAT, as children have usually entered the first year of primary school by the time they are of compulsory school age.” This reassurance aims to quell concerns that nursery fees will rise widely. Additionally, standalone nurseries that are not attached to private schools remain exempt from VAT, no matter the age of their attendees. However, there remains a broader debate over the policy's impact on families who choose to defer their child’s entry to primary school. A Treasury source emphasized that the decision to defer school entry, which some parents choose for summer-born children or for children with additional needs, is a personal choice made in the child’s best interest. The source argued that financial concerns should not pressure families into sending children to school earlier than they are ready. The spokesperson stated, “There are lots of reasons why a family may feel that deferring starting school is right for their child, from their age for summer-born children to those with additional needs or prolonged absences.” Critics of the policy continue to express that families should be free to make decisions about their child’s education without the pressure of increased nursery costs. They argue that any policy change impacting early childhood should prioritize a child’s developmental readiness, not financial implications for parents or preschools. As the January implementation date approaches, the discussion remains a complex blend of education policy, class considerations, and family choice. Based on a report by Sky News 2024-11-13

As the much-anticipated fight between Mike Tyson and Jake Paul approaches, Tyson has been preparing rigorously for his return to the ring after nearly two decades. Scheduled to take place at Arlington's AT&T Stadium on November 15, this bout marks Tyson's first officially sanctioned fight in 19 years, and the 58-year-old has made drastic changes to his diet, lifestyle, and training regimen in anticipation of facing his 27-year-old opponent. The former world heavyweight champion, known as "Iron Mike," has spent the majority of this year in intense training for what will be his professional comeback. He’s shared glimpses of his training sessions on social media, demonstrating impressive speed, power, and a chiseled physique. Tyson himself recently spoke about the dedication and discipline his preparation requires. Tyson has made radical adjustments to his lifestyle for this comeback. A longtime advocate for veganism, Tyson adopted a plant-based diet in 2010 after retiring in 2005. He cited his health and a desire to avoid foods that come from animals. Reflecting on his dietary choices, Tyson once told *GQ Sports*, "I don’t eat anything that has a mother and father. If you were created through a mother and father, through any kind of intercourse, I won’t eat you." He explained this philosophy meant he only consumed plant-based foods, embracing vegetables and other vegan staples. However, in his quest to regain his former strength and stamina, Tyson has recently abandoned veganism, reintroducing meat to his diet. He discussed the decision on *The Joe Rogan Experience*, noting, "I stopped [eating vegan food] because of the training and because of what I wanted my body to look like and the strength that I wanted to possess." Along with this dietary shift, Tyson has also reportedly given up two other staples in his life: sex and cannabis, both of which he has abstained from during training to stay focused on his comeback. The dedication shown by Tyson in his training is evident, as he prepares to fight an opponent 31 years his junior. This upcoming bout against Jake Paul will be a test of Tyson's physical prowess, discipline, and ability to withstand the demands of high-level competition once again. With a grueling training schedule, lifestyle sacrifices, and a revamped diet, Tyson is determined to make an impressive return, showcasing that age is no barrier when it comes to resilience and commitment to the sport. Based on a report by Daily Mail 2024-11-13

Despite his diminished reputation, Prince Andrew continues to find benefactors willing to fund his luxurious lifestyle. For years, he has relied on wealthy friends and contacts to sustain a high-profile existence, even after his public disgrace and King Charles’s withdrawal of financial support. The Duke of York seems perpetually able to lean on others, from former associates to well-connected figures, sparking questions about why they remain willing to pay his way. Support for Andrew has come from surprising sources. Years ago, an oligarch connected to Kazakhstan’s then-president paid £3 million over the asking price for his former marital home at Sunninghill Park. Then, the late Jeffrey Epstein, the disgraced financier and convicted sex offender, lent the duke’s ex-wife Sarah Ferguson £15,000 to help clear her debts. These figures, controversial in their own right, maintained close ties to Andrew even as his public image faltered. After King Charles ceased paying for Andrew’s security costs, the Duke reportedly tapped “other sources of income” through his contacts in international trade. As royal journalist Robert Hardman’s biography delicately phrases it, Andrew’s networking with powerful figures worldwide has somehow kept him financially afloat, allowing him to retain some trappings of his former role. And just as his finances became increasingly precarious, another unexpected benefactor stepped in, paying to maintain his residence at Royal Lodge—a lavish 30-bedroom estate in Windsor Great Park. As yet, this latest benefactor’s identity remains undisclosed, sparing the Duke from relocating to Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s more modest Frogmore Cottage, which reportedly has a mere five bedrooms and a yoga studio. According to reports, Michael Stevens, keeper of the privy purse, reviewed and approved this arrangement, a development that raises questions about transparency in public life and private funding. This undisclosed assistance invites scrutiny: such opacity over large donations to high-profile individuals has often led to complications and ethical concerns. Prince Andrew’s connections to affluence are not new. His tenure as a “trade envoy” involved globetrotting and engaging with influential figures, leading some to speculate that his royal connections were a central part of his networking appeal. Now, even without a visible income source—except his navy pension, as his annual allowance has reportedly been withdrawn—Andrew seems to maintain his royal-adjacent lifestyle. Many might wonder if it’s his personal charm or his connections that keep attracting support. Some of his wealthy friends have stayed loyal even after he paid an estimated £12 million to settle a civil case with Virginia Giuffre, a victim of Epstein’s trafficking, a case in which Andrew denies any sexual relationship with her. Speculation about the origins of that settlement’s funds has also lingered, adding to the mystery surrounding Andrew’s finances. The saga prompts further questions about Andrew’s supporters and their motives. In an era where back-door entry into the British establishment and access to power hold sway, the prince’s ongoing connections raise the possibility of murky interests at play. Some benefactors may see Andrew as a pathway to influence, while others may have personal or political motivations for sustaining his position. Given the complex web of global wealth, political power, and royal influence, the support behind Prince Andrew calls for greater scrutiny. Perhaps it’s time for Parliament to investigate with urgency and foresight, shedding light on the forces that enable him to maintain a lifestyle many veterans—and indeed most citizens—could never afford. Based on a report by the Guardian 2024-11-13

President-elect Donald Trump is making good on his campaign promises to implement sweeping immigration reforms, taking concrete steps toward a rigorous crackdown on undocumented immigrants and heightened border security. On Monday, he appointed two prominent figures known for their hardline stances to senior positions in the incoming administration. Stephen Miller, a former advisor and speechwriter during Trump’s first term, is expected to serve as deputy chief of staff, according to sources familiar with the selection. Miller, who played a key role in developing previous policies such as the travel ban on Muslim-majority countries and family separation at the border, will work under White House chief of staff Susie Wiles, who co-managed Trump’s campaign. Tom Homan, a former acting head of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), will assume the role of “border czar,” tasked with overseeing border security and deportation efforts. Trump announced Homan’s role on social media late Sunday, signaling the importance he places on the position. Homan is known for his uncompromising stance on immigration enforcement, and his role as “border czar” suggests a move toward intensified deportation operations. While spokespeople for Miller and the transition team declined to comment, the appointments reflect Trump’s intent to follow through on his campaign rhetoric. In addition to his immigration team, Trump is expanding his foreign policy and national security roster. On Monday, he requested that Rep. Mike Waltz, a retired Army Green Beret and an outspoken critic of China, serve as national security advisor. Trump also intends to nominate Sen. Marco Rubio, known for his hawkish foreign policy stance, as secretary of state, according to sources. Rubio’s experience and position as a Florida Republican align with Trump’s goal of presenting a tougher stance on foreign affairs. Trump also named Rep. Elise Stefanik from New York as his pick for ambassador to the United Nations, along with former congressman Lee Zeldin, another New York Republican, to lead the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Each appointee brings a reputation for strong policy views, hinting at the potential for notable shifts in both foreign policy and environmental regulation. Throughout his campaign, Trump repeatedly promised to close the U.S.-Mexico border and enact one of the largest deportation initiatives in American history. His plans include implementing a mass deportation strategy modeled after President Eisenhower’s 1950s-era “Operation Wetback,” which involved military-style tactics to remove migrant workers under hazardous conditions. While the scale of Trump’s proposed operation has raised logistical concerns—such as shortages of ICE officers, detention centers, and immigration judges—he remains undeterred. In a post-election interview with NBC, Trump asserted his commitment to this sweeping immigration overhaul, regardless of the costs involved. “They’re going to go back to those countries because they’re not staying here,” Trump said of undocumented immigrants. “There is no price tag.” His statement reinforces his determination to enforce strict immigration controls, sparking debate on the implications for immigrants and for those who will execute the plan. Based on a report by WP 2024-11-13

In the wake of recent elections, left-leaning social media users have flocked to Meta’s Threads platform, posting conspiracy theories about the integrity of the election process. Many allege that President-elect Donald Trump’s win involved widespread fraud. Threads, Meta's app designed to rival Twitter (now known as X), has become a hub for left-wing speculation, with theories swirling that Elon Musk, a high-profile supporter of Trump, used his Starlink satellites to hack voting machines and manipulate results. One Threads user expressed disbelief, writing, “Are you f*ing kidding me?!?!?! Someone who’s openly campaigning for one of the presidential parties is delivering the internet connection to voting machines and says ‘he can hack EVERYTHING,’ and this gives no reason for concern?!??!” Another user supporting Vice President Kamala Harris posted, “Multiple sources reveal that Starlink was involved in tabulating the votes. Starlink. Owned and controlled by Elon Musk. Who worked for the Trump campaign. Hello? Anyone?” Further accusations emerged from a user named alex.nick.jungle, who said, “I like how no one from the press is talking about how Elon Musk just rigged the election.” Claims about Musk’s interference spread rapidly on Threads, where one commenter alleged “WIDESPREAD voter fraud & votes being thrown into the trash/woods and mysteriously going missing.” Similar ideas have also surfaced on Musk's platform, X, and on TikTok, as speculation about the election has grown across social media. One user on X urged others to consider, “Raise your hand if you think Elon Musk’s Starlink was the ‘Little Secret’ to win or steal this election.” Adding fuel to these theories, some Threads users have pointed to voting results discrepancies. In North Carolina, for example, Democrats secured major down-ballot races, with Josh Stein winning the governor’s race by over 800,000 votes, yet Trump reportedly won against Harris by fewer than 200,000 votes. “Trump’s margin in NC is based ENTIRELY on under-votes,” wrote one Threads user, who added, “This makes absolutely NO SENSE!” Iowa’s results also raised questions among conspiracy theorists. One Threads user noted a last-minute poll by respected researcher Ann Selzer, which indicated Harris was ahead in the state by three points. “Ann seltzer, the gold standard for poll watchers, said Kamala was ahead in Iowa by 3 points, and she loses it by 13? Odd things everywhere were happening,” they wrote, implying that polling data further cast doubt on the election’s validity. Adding to the stir, former Washington Post columnist Taylor Lorenz reported in her Substack newsletter that Threads users widely shared a post by “Stephen Spoonamore,” a reputed tech expert known as “liberal Q.” Spoonamore’s post warned that a “full blown #fascist takeover is underway” and claimed Trump’s supporters managed to “hack the tabulation machines.” Spoonamore’s statement, which cautioned, “Be aware these people are sociopaths who will kill you, they have done so to others, so act accordingly,” gained significant traction. In response to claims about Threads hosting a wave of conspiracy theories, a Meta spokesperson stated, “The suggestion that Threads is inundated or overrun with this type of content belies reality.” Meta has systems in place, utilizing independent fact-checkers to analyze and rate flagged posts. Content deemed “false” or “altered” is assigned restrictive ratings, limiting distribution and visibility across the platform. Since its launch in July of last year, Threads has attracted 275 million monthly users, a user base that has grown by 175% from the 100 million users recorded a year ago, according to Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg. With Threads adding more than 1 million new users daily, the app is rapidly expanding, hoping to compete with Musk's X platform, which has an estimated 318 million monthly users. Based on a report by NYP 2024-11-13

Senator Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) has openly criticized Democrats for their reluctance to engage with Joe Rogan and other prominent podcast hosts, arguing that this hesitation is a missed opportunity to reach large and diverse audiences. Sanders shared his views during an interview on CNN’s *State of the Union*, responding to host Dana Bash’s questions about the backlash he faced after appearing on Rogan’s show and receiving Rogan’s endorsement in the 2020 primary race. Reflecting on the controversy, Sanders defended his decision to engage with Rogan, saying, “Yeah, I think that’s fair enough. Look, you’re going to have an argument with Rogan, agree with him, disagree with him. But, what’s the problem with going on those shows? It’s hard for me to understand that.” Sanders pointed out that Rogan’s platform reaches “millions and millions of viewers” and emphasized the importance of candidates connecting with a wide range of media audiences. Rogan recently endorsed former President Donald Trump shortly before Election Day, following a lengthy interview with Trump on his podcast. The interview, which spanned nearly three hours, covered a range of topics. Trump’s ally and tech mogul Elon Musk also made an appearance on Rogan’s show just ahead of the election, strengthening ties with Rogan’s audience, which skews younger and male. Vice President Kamala Harris, in contrast, opted not to travel to Rogan’s Texas-based studio for an interview, though her campaign did not explicitly decline the opportunity. Instead, Harris’s team suggested that Rogan would need to come to her, offering only an hour-long slot for the interview. The meeting ultimately fell through, with some Democrats later criticizing the decision, suggesting that Harris missed a valuable opportunity to connect with Rogan’s extensive audience. In the aftermath of a disappointing election, Democrats have engaged in intense self-reflection, trying to understand what went wrong. Some party members argue that Harris’s decision to skip the Rogan interview was emblematic of a broader disconnect with younger, independent voters, particularly young men who make up a significant portion of Rogan’s listeners. Sanders has remained vocal about the need for Democrats to engage with alternative media outlets. In January 2020, Rogan had expressed his support for Sanders in the Democratic primary, a gesture that sparked backlash from some members of the Democratic establishment who were wary of Rogan’s sometimes controversial commentary. Despite the criticism, Sanders maintains that his decision to engage with Rogan was a sensible one, saying on Sunday, “I don’t see a problem in doing that.” Based on a report by the Hill 2024-11-13

In Berlin, a Jewish youth football team from Makkabi Berlin was placed under police protection after they reported being pursued and attacked by a pro-Palestinian mob wielding knives and sticks during a recent match. The team, composed of teenagers aged 13 to 16, described the harrowing incident, which took place in the Neukölln district, an area known for its large Arab and Turkish communities. According to accounts shared by team members and their families, the Jewish youth felt they were “hunted down” following the game against local rival Schwarz-Weiss Neukölln. One father reported his son returned home visibly shaken after being spat upon and followed by a group of adults and young people who harassed the team as they left the field. A screenshot posted on social media from one of the players detailed how they were chased by “Arab youths” who allegedly shouted, “Free Palestine” and “F---ing Jews,” while brandishing knives and sticks. Alon Meyer, president of Makkabi Germany, spoke with witnesses and confirmed reports of threats and intimidation, stating, “threats, including chasing people with knives, undoubtedly took place.” Schwarz-Weiss Neukölln condemned the assault and pledged to ban those responsible, affirming that “incidents like this don’t belong on soccer pitches – and certainly not on ours.” Berlin’s Staatsschutz, the division responsible for investigating politically motivated crimes, has opened an inquiry into the attack. Makkabi Berlin’s adult teams have already been under police protection since the Hamas-led attacks on Israel last year, and officers were dispatched to secure the club’s matches over the weekend in response to this recent assault. Founded in the 1970s by Holocaust survivors, Makkabi Berlin was established as a sanctuary and a symbol of Jewish life after World War II. Its founders saw the club as a continuation of Bar-Kochba Berlin, a prominent Jewish sports club that flourished in the 1920s. The attack on Makkabi’s youth team highlights a troubling rise in anti-Semitic tensions in Germany. Authorities have warned that the threat to Jewish life in the country has reached unprecedented levels since the Nazi era, with some local officials advising Jewish residents to avoid displaying religious symbols in certain neighborhoods. In commemoration of the anniversary of Kristallnacht, Berlin official Ms. Springer stated, “These acts show that anti-Semitic violence and discrimination have not disappeared in our city either.” Her remarks referenced the tragic events of November 9, 1938, when Nazi mobs burned synagogues and Jewish businesses across Germany in a night of violent anti-Semitism. Today, the echoes of that dark history serve as a reminder of the need for vigilance and solidarity against ongoing discrimination and violence. Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2024-11-13 Related: Israeli fans violently attacked after Amsterdam soccer match

David Lammy, the UK’s current foreign secretary, faces pressure to apologize for comments he made about former U.S. President Donald Trump in 2019. Ezra A. Cohen, who held the position of acting under-secretary of defense for intelligence during Trump’s first term, has publicly suggested that Lammy owes “an apology to the American people” for his critical remarks. Cohen’s criticism specifically targets a 2019 tweet from Lammy, who, at the time, was a Labour Party backbencher. In the post, Lammy referred to Trump as “deluded, dishonest, xenophobic, narcissistic,” and claimed the U.S. president was “no friend of Britain.” He further asserted that Trump was “not fit to hold public office” and dismissed the idea of Trump being honored with a state banquet with Queen Elizabeth II. Lammy’s words underscored his deep concerns over Trump's policies and character, and he openly questioned the appropriateness of a state visit for the president. Now, as speculation grows that Cohen could take on a national security or defense role if Trump is re-elected, he’s underscored the importance of the U.S.-UK “special relationship” and its continuity. He took to social media platform X (formerly Twitter) to say, “Our special relationship with the United Kingdom is of the utmost importance and must continue. Thus I look forward to David Lammy’s apology to the American people who overwhelmingly chose President Trump as our leader.” This call for an apology comes as the newly-elected center-left Labour government in Britain seeks to strengthen relations with the U.S. amidst a likely return of Trump to the Oval Office. Lammy’s criticisms of Trump over the years have extended beyond that single tweet. He has used harsh language to describe Trump as a “neo-Nazi sympathizing sociopath,” “dangerous clown,” and “racist KKK and Nazi sympathizer,” even promising to oppose any Trump visit to the UK during his presidency. However, recent shifts in Lammy’s approach suggest a desire to forge new diplomatic paths. He recently visited Washington, D.C., where he engaged with prominent figures close to Trump and downplayed his prior remarks as “old news.” Lammy has expressed that he now prioritizes finding “common ground” with the U.S., a shift that has not gone unnoticed by UK conservatives. UK Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch has seized on the controversy, urging Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Lammy’s superior, to issue an apology on Lammy’s behalf. The pressure from British conservatives reflects broader tensions around the political and diplomatic challenges posed by past remarks on Trump as his potential return looms. While Lammy’s comments continue to be scrutinized, British Ambassador to the U.S., Karen Pierce, has offered a perspective that downplays their significance. Speaking with CBS, Pierce remarked, “In my experience, politicians kind of absorb those sorts of comments as part of the wear and tear of political life. What’s important is the relationship now.” Based on a report by Politico 2024-11-13