Social Media

Five years after the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic, the World Health Organization (WHO) has renewed its appeal to China for transparency in uncovering the origins of the virus. The pandemic, which has claimed millions of lives, disrupted economies, and overwhelmed healthcare systems, remains an enduring global concern. In a statement issued Monday, the WHO emphasized the importance of collaboration. "We continue to call on China to share data and access so we can understand the origins of Covid-19. This is a moral and scientific imperative," the organization declared. It further underscored that without transparency and cooperation between nations, the world risks being unprepared for future pandemics. "Without transparency, sharing, and cooperation among countries, the world cannot adequately prevent and prepare for future epidemics and pandemics." The agency recalled the initial alert it received on December 31, 2019, when its country office in China detected reports from health authorities in Wuhan regarding cases of "viral pneumonia." The following months saw the virus redefine global norms. "In the weeks, months and years that unfolded after that, Covid-19 came to shape our lives and our world," the WHO remarked. Marking the five-year milestone, the organization took a moment to honor those affected by the pandemic. "Let’s take a moment to honour the lives changed and lost, recognise those who are suffering from Covid-19 and Long Covid, express gratitude to the health workers who sacrificed so much to care for us, and commit to learning from Covid-19 to build a healthier tomorrow," it urged. Earlier in December, WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus addressed the question of whether the world was better equipped for the next pandemic. His response reflected both progress and lingering vulnerabilities. "The answer is yes, and no," he stated. "If the next pandemic arrived today, the world would still face some of the same weaknesses and vulnerabilities that gave Covid-19 a foothold five years ago. But the world has also learnt many of the painful lessons the pandemic taught us, and has taken significant steps to strengthen its defences against future epidemics and pandemics." Efforts to formalize a global response mechanism are ongoing. In December 2021, spurred by Covid-19's devastating impact, nations began drafting an international accord on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response. While significant progress has been made, negotiations remain gridlocked on critical issues. A notable divide exists between wealthier nations with established pharmaceutical industries and low-income countries concerned about equitable access during future health crises. Central to the debate is the commitment to rapidly share emerging pathogens and the resulting benefits, such as vaccines. These unresolved matters remain the core of the treaty, which has a negotiation deadline set for May 2025. As the world reflects on five years of grappling with Covid-19, the WHO’s call for collaboration serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing need for global solidarity in addressing both current and future public health challenges. Based on a report by AFP 2024-01-02

BBC Verify, an investigative unit launched to combat disinformation, has faced increasing scrutiny due to high-profile missteps in its reporting. Promoted as the "frontline of the fight for truth," the unit's commitment to accuracy has been questioned following a series of corrections and controversies. A notable example arose during the riots following the Southport murders, when BBC Verify reported a violent racist attack in Humberside. The team identified two alleged attackers using open-source intelligence (OSINT) and facial recognition, claiming they targeted a car of men "of Asian heritage." However, Humberside Police later clarified that the victims were Eastern European, making the event unrelated to racial tensions as originally reported. Despite having multiple writers on the story, Verify failed to identify this critical detail before publication. Another instance involved allegations of systemic racism in the motor insurance industry. Maryam Ahmed, a BBC Verify journalist, reported that drivers in racially diverse areas paid 33% higher premiums, suggesting an "ethnicity penalty." Months later, the article was quietly retracted. The BBC admitted its analysis was flawed, stating it had failed to account for the limitations of its data. In October 2022, BBC Verify’s reporting on an explosion at Al Ahli hospital in Gaza sparked further controversy. Initially attributing the blast to an Israeli airstrike, the BBC echoed Hamas' claim of 500 deaths. Subsequent investigations by independent experts and Western governments pointed to a misfired Palestinian rocket, significantly reducing the death toll. While many revised their assessments, Verify maintained the event’s origins were "contested," relying heavily on analysis from Forensic Architecture, an organization with strong ties to pro-Palestinian activism. Critics argued this affiliation should have been disclosed to provide context for the claim. Another Gaza-related report from Verify relied on a questionable source. Mahmoud Awadeyah alleged that Israeli soldiers deliberately attacked civilians during an aid distribution in March 2023. However, Awadeyah’s ties to Tasnim, a media outlet controlled by Iran's Revolutionary Guards, and his history of celebrating anti-Israeli violence raised serious doubts about his credibility. Despite these associations, BBC Verify presented his account without disclosing these affiliations, leading former BBC Television Director Danny Cohen to criticize the omission as "misleading audiences." Since its inception in May 2023, Verify has published more than 200 stories, of which approximately 5% have been corrected, clarified, or withdrawn. Cohen highlighted this as a troubling statistic, emphasizing the BBC’s responsibility to uphold the highest journalistic standards. These controversies underline deeper concerns about Verify's approach, which some argue prioritizes quick, shareable content over rigorous fact-checking. As the unit continues to dominate BBC News output with over 60 dedicated journalists, its effectiveness in combating disinformation will depend on its ability to address these systemic flaws and rebuild trust with its audience. Based on a report by UnHerd 2024-01-02 Related: Former BBC News Chief Voices Concerns Over Verify Unit’s Impact on Journalism Credibility

Former US President Donald Trump has once again issued a strong ultimatum to Hamas, demanding the immediate release of hostages being held in Gaza. Trump’s comments came during a New Year’s Eve gala at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida, as he was pressed by reporters on the delicate situation. The former president’s remarks highlight the ongoing tension surrounding the hostages and the apparent impasse in talks aimed at resolving the crisis. As Trump prepares for a potential return to office, his firm stance underscores the high stakes involved in addressing the situation in the region. Asked about his resolutions for the new year, Trump said, “I just want everybody to be happy, healthy and well.” Trump later took the stage to briefly address the crowd ringing in the new year at Mar-a-Lago and promised “to do a great job as your president.” Biden, for his part, spent New Year’s Eve celebrating the wedding of his niece Missy Owens in Greenville, Delaware, followed by the reception in Kennett Square, Pennsylvania. Biden and first lady Jill Biden cut short their traditional holiday trip to the U.S. Virgin Islands to attend the ceremony. Based on a report by USA News | TOI | 2024-01-02

#BREAKING New Orleans truck-ramming attack being investigated as act of terrorism: FBI

Numerous off topic posts removed @Will B Good the replies also removed. The topic here is New Orleans: Multiple people dead on Bourbon Street as 'car ploughs through crowd' Have some respect and stay on it rather than talk about other posters who have not even posted on the thread.

Reports suggested a vehicle had driven through a crowd on New Orleans' extremely popular Bourbon Street, killing multiple people. Emergency services, including ambulances and vehicles from the coroner's office, were reportedly at the scene. Bourbon Street appeared to be shut down with a heavy police presence. In a post on X, a journalist at local news outlet WGNO-TV wrote: "NOPD source states that as many as 10 fatalities after driver in pickup truck plowed into crowd on Bourbon Street. "Multiple more injuries. Mayor and police chief on scene," he added, though this has not yet been confirmed. WGNO reports the Bourbon Street has been cleared and closed as emergency services attend its intersection with Iberville. Based on a reports by CBS | Daily Express | 2025-01-02

Post with a web link to an unapproved source which previously claimed Israel should not have its own state, is pro-Muslim Brotherhood and pro-Hamas has been removed @simple1 Along with a comment on moderation by the same poster. Any more of the same and a warning will be issued.

In November, a piece of space debris hurtling toward the International Space Station (ISS) forced astronauts onboard to act swiftly. To avoid disaster, a Russian spacecraft docked to the ISS fired its engines for five minutes, altering the station’s orbit and narrowly dodging the debris. Without this maneuver, the object could have come within 2.5 miles (4 kilometers) of the station’s path, according to NASA. A direct collision could have depressurized parts of the station, potentially forcing the crew to evacuate. Space traffic experts have long warned of this increasing congestion. Decades of collisions, explosions, and anti-satellite weapons tests have scattered tens of thousands of trackable debris fragments into orbit, with potentially millions of smaller, untrackable pieces lingering. Beyond the dangers to astronauts, this space clutter poses serious risks to satellites that support vital technologies such as GPS, high-speed internet, and television. “The number of objects in space that we have launched in the last four years has increased exponentially,” said Dr. Vishnu Reddy, a planetary sciences professor at the University of Arizona. “So we are heading towards the situation that we are always dreading.” This situation is known as Kessler Syndrome, named after American astrophysicist Donald Kessler, who first described it in a 1978 paper. Kessler Syndrome refers to a theoretical chain reaction where debris from one collision triggers more collisions, producing additional fragments. This cascade effect could eventually render Earth’s orbit so cluttered that satellites become inoperable and space exploration grinds to a halt. The European Space Agency has recorded more than 650 fragment-producing events since the advent of spaceflight in 1957. These include satellite collisions, unexpected explosions of spacecraft, and deliberate weapons tests conducted by countries like the United States, Russia, India, and China. For instance, in 2021, Russia destroyed one of its own satellites with a missile, generating more than 1,500 trackable pieces of debris. The concept of Kessler Syndrome gained popular attention through the 2013 film *Gravity*, in which a Russian missile strike sets off a devastating series of space collisions. However, real-world scenarios would unfold over years or even decades rather than the brief span depicted in the movie. Today, congestion in orbit is accelerating at an alarming pace. The U.S. military tracked about 23,000 objects in orbit when *Gravity* premiered. That number has since doubled to approximately 47,000 objects. Scientists are racing to predict how and when a cascading effect might occur, but the task is fraught with uncertainty. “As soon as we’re predicting into the future, we have to make assumptions,” noted Purdue University’s Carolin Frueh. “Every model is wrong — (but) some are useful.” The question now is whether Kessler Syndrome has already begun. Since it is not an instantaneous event, scientists debate whether the chain reaction is in its early stages. Kessler’s original thought experiment invites us to consider if, even with no further rocket launches, the collisions already in motion might escalate the proliferation of orbital debris. The answer remains unclear, but one thing is certain: space is running out of room. Based on a report by CNN 2024-12-31

Farmers across the country are planning a significant escalation in their protests against the government’s recent inheritance tax changes. In a bold move, radical elements within farming protest groups are preparing to blockade supermarket distribution centers, potentially crippling the nation’s food supply chain. According to sources, the planned action could begin as early as mid-January, starting with short blockades to demonstrate feasibility before escalating to longer shutdowns. The ultimate goal, protest leaders warn, could be a “complete shutdown” of distribution hubs, leading to empty supermarket shelves and widespread disruption. “The first time will be for a short period to show it can be done,” one protest insider told *The Telegraph*. “Then a 12 or 24-hour shutdown, and ultimately, if it gets that far, a complete shutdown until the Government comes to the table. It could ultimately shut down the economy—no food means serious chaos. The Government have picked a fight with the wrong sector!” The unrest stems from a policy announced by Chancellor Rachel Reeves in the Autumn budget, which imposed a 20 percent inheritance tax on farmers’ assets exceeding £1 million. This marked a significant shift from previous tax breaks that allowed family farms to pass down through generations without being subjected to the 40 percent inheritance tax rate. The new policy has provoked widespread anger within the farming community. In November, thousands of farmers gathered in Westminster to protest the tax, with high-profile attendees like Jeremy Clarkson, the former *Top Gear* presenter, lending their support. Since then, smaller demonstrations have continued in the capital, and tractor “go-slow” protests have been staged in areas such as Dover and Suffolk. The National Farmers’ Union (NFU) and other farming organizations are organizing a national day of action on January 25, which will include tractor rallies and roadside banners targeting Labour’s marginal constituencies. However, some groups believe these measures are not enough and are opting for a more aggressive approach with the planned blockade. The proposed action would focus on disrupting supermarket distribution centers, which are critical for moving food from suppliers to retail outlets. Such a move could result in significant disruptions to the nation’s food supply chain, with empty shelves and delayed deliveries impacting households across the country. As tensions rise, protest leaders are adamant that the government must reconsider its policy. They argue that the tax changes threaten the viability of family-run farms, which have long been the backbone of the UK’s agricultural sector. By targeting this essential industry, they contend, the government risks destabilizing not just the farming community but the entire economy. “It could ultimately shut down the economy, no food means serious chaos. The Government have picked a fight with the wrong sector!” Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2024-12-31

President Joe Biden’s final days in office have sparked intense debate, with CNN commentator Scott Jennings declaring that the president will “leave office in disgrace.” This sharp critique was voiced during Sunday’s episode of CNN’s *State of the Union*, where Jennings joined host Dana Bash and fellow panelist Karen Finney to discuss Biden’s legacy. “I think he’s gonna leave office in disgrace,” Jennings stated, as reported by *Mediaite*. “The Hunter Biden pardon was disgraceful. He’s going to be remembered largely for inflation and for the disastrous Afghanistan pullout.” Jennings also raised concerns about the administration’s handling of Biden’s cognitive health, suggesting that significant efforts were made to obscure a potential decline. “I think it’s going to be a really ugly chapter,” he remarked. “It’s a diminished presidency because of it.” He further speculated about the extent of these alleged efforts, adding, “I think we still don’t know the full extent of what they did to try to hide what they’ve been doing over in the West Wing.” As the transition to President-elect Donald Trump nears, Biden has undertaken a series of final executive actions. Among them is the controversial decision to pardon his son, Hunter Biden, which has drawn sharp criticism from Republicans and commentators alike. In addition to this, Biden commuted the sentences of 37 individuals on federal death row, further fueling debate over his legacy. While Biden’s supporters highlight achievements in infrastructure, healthcare, and climate policy, detractors like Jennings argue that his administration will be remembered for scandals, economic challenges, and what they perceive as a chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan. With just weeks left in his presidency, the debate over Joe Biden’s legacy is far from settled, leaving Americans divided over how history will remember the 46th president. Based on a report by The Hill 2024-12-31

A public feud between Reform Party leader Nigel Farage and Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has escalated, with Farage demanding an apology for allegations that he misrepresented his party’s membership size. The controversy has spilled into the media, particularly GB News, where Farage hosts a prime-time show. The row began on Boxing Day when Farage claimed that the Reform Party now boasts more members than the Conservatives. Badenoch reportedly dismissed this as "fakery," sparking a heated exchange. Farage responded by calling the accusation “disgraceful” and insisting that Badenoch either apologize or face consequences. Farage took to social media, tweeting: “Kemi talks about competition being a good thing but now we see that she wants me taken off air. Maybe her first priority should be to go on GB News today and apologize for calling me dishonest. Her two days of silence are deafening.” The feud intensified with reports that Badenoch urged GB News executives to limit Farage’s airtime, allegedly accusing the channel of “favoring” him and giving undue exposure to her critics. Sources close to Badenoch dismissed these claims as “nonsense,” but Farage continued to press the issue, describing her actions as part of a "crazy conspiracy theory." According to *The Mail on Sunday*, GB News CEO Angelos Frangopoulos was summoned to meet with Badenoch before Christmas. During this meeting, Badenoch reportedly expressed concerns over the regulatory implications of allowing politicians like Farage, Lee Anderson, and Andrea Jenkyns to host programs on the channel. However, sources close to Badenoch framed the discussion differently, stating that she was seeking to ensure media projects adhere to “the highest standards of propriety.” An ally of Badenoch commented, “Kemi had a good meeting with GB News, which was mostly about her doing more with the channel. She did ask about the status of programs fronted by politicians and where GB News stood with the regulator. The meeting was very friendly.” Farage, however, has characterized the situation as an attack on his credibility and a bid to silence him. He also alleged that whistleblowers informed him that ballots were sent to former Conservative members during their leadership election, further fueling his accusations of impropriety within the Tory party. The debate has even extended to social media, where a fact-checking alert on one of Badenoch’s tweets labeled her claims about Farage as false. The community note added, “This claim is false. It’s not a ‘fake ticker.’” Farage continues to demand a public apology, stating, “The accusations of fraud and dishonesty made against me are disgraceful.” As the dispute plays out, it highlights tensions between traditional media, political figures, and emerging platforms like GB News, which increasingly serve as battlegrounds for public opinion. Based on a report by Daily Mail 2024-12-31

Two trainee police officers, celebrated for their courage and quick thinking, successfully apprehended a rapist on the streets of Birmingham. The incident unfolded after Awalkhan Sultankhail, 24, committed a horrifying attack on a woman in a park. The assault occurred on August 27 last year, when Sultankhail approached his victim on Golden Hillock Road in Small Heath at approximately 4 PM. After attempting to initiate a conversation, he dragged her into nearby bushes and raped her when she tried to walk away. The assault was interrupted by a member of the public, who promptly alerted the police, causing Sultankhail to flee. CCTV footage and a detailed description provided by the victim enabled police officers to identify Sultankhail four days later. Pcs Declan McDevitt and Peter Jones, on reassurance patrols in the area, recognized the suspect and initiated a pursuit. In dramatic video footage, the two officers can be seen chasing Sultankhail before cornering and arresting him on Ladypool Road in Sparkbrook. Speaking about the arrest, Pc Jones shared the emotional intensity of the moment: “I was just concentrating on not letting him get away, due to the nature of the offence. I was also concentrated on communicating using my radio to other officers and the control room by letting them know where the suspect was running, in order to get more officers there in case we lost him in the foot chase.” Reflecting on the successful apprehension, Pc Jones added, “I felt immensely proud of myself and Pc McDevitt as we have caught someone who has committed an horrific offence in broad daylight. I went home that day feeling satisfied that I have helped the victim get one step closer to getting the justice she deserves, and knowing that he won’t be able to commit another offence for a long time.” Sultankhail initially denied interacting with or following the victim. However, faced with overwhelming evidence, he pleaded guilty to the crime. At Birmingham Crown Court, he was sentenced to five years and three months in prison, with an additional four years to be spent on licence. Supt Emlyn Richards of Birmingham Police commended the officers, stating, “This was absolutely first-rate work by these two officers, who have only relatively recently joined us. The footage shows how the two refused to let the suspect get away, and thanks to their determination, he’s now going to be spending years behind bars.” This swift and determined response highlights the bravery and dedication of trainee officers in protecting the community and ensuring justice for victims of crime. Based on a report by The Independent 2024-12-31

Teens forced to perform sexual acts on each other: Report to UN details Hamas torture. Government document compiles grim details of abuse of hostages, including whipping, branding with heated iron, isolation, binding, starving, maltreatment and psychological torment. The report from Israel’s health ministry details the horrific torture and abuse inflicted on the hostages in Gaza. More on the report from Sky News: According to the report, the terrorist captors forced two minors to perform sexual acts on one another and compelled them to take off their clothes in front of them, touched their private parts, and whipped their genitalia. The same two former hostages also reported that “they were held bound and were beaten throughout their captivity. Signs of binding, scars, and marks consistent with trauma were found,” the report says. “Additionally, two young children had burn marks on their lower limbs,” the report adds. “One child stated that the burns were the result of a deliberate branding with a heated object. Both the child and adults who were with him in captivity described the incident as a purposeful branding event, not an accident. It was described as an extremely traumatic experience.” “One of the returned hostages described being sexually assaulted at gunpoint by a Hamas terrorist,” the report says. “On several occasions, captors forced women of all ages to undress while others, including the captors, watched. Some women reported that the captors sexually assaulted them. Some former hostages have spoken publicly. Earlier this year, freed hostage Amit Soussana told The New York Times of how she was forced to perform “a sexual act” on one of her captors. Conditions were ‘designed to torture the hostages psychologically’. A total of 251 hostages were abducted from Israel on October 7, 2023, during the Hamas-led onslaught in southern Israel that killed 1,200 people. Ninety-six of them remain in Gaza, including the bodies of at least 34 confirmed dead by the IDF. Hamas released 105 civilians during a weeklong truce in late November, and four hostages were released before that. Eight hostages have been rescued by troops alive, and the bodies of 38 hostages have also been recovered, including three mistakenly killed by the Israeli military as they tried to escape their captors. Captives, including children, were forced to watch videos of the October 7 atrocities. Many of the terrorists who took part in the attack filmed it, including extreme acts of cruelty. The men, meanwhile, “endured severe physical abuse, including continuous starvation, beatings, burns with galvanized iron (branding), hair-pulling, confinement in closed rooms with a limited amount of food and water, being held in isolation with hands and feet tied, and being denied access to the bathroom, which forced them to defecate on themselves.” The Hostages and Missing Families Forum said the report painted “a grim reality of the physical abuse and psychological torment” endured by the hostages. It urged a comprehensive deal “to secure the immediate release of all hostages.” Based on reports by AFP | VOA News | TOI | 2024-12-31 Related Topics Harrowing Captivity: The Ordeal and Rescue of Hostages Held by Hamas Chilling Confessions Father and Son Describe Sexual Crimes During Hamas Invasion New Very Disturbing Video Released of 5 Female Hostages being abducted by Hamas on Oct 7th UN finds evidence of rape on Oct. 7 and after; Israel: They tried to downplay issue

Columbia University has launched an investigation into a controversial student newspaper titled *The Columbia Intifada*, which has sparked significant backlash. The university disavowed the publication, emphasizing that its association with the institution’s name and its messaging are unacceptable. Columbia University is so embedded in Anti-Israel propaganda that it has a publication entitled “The Columbia Intifada.” What is needed in our society is a revolution of the responsible against the Intifada idiocy of the far left. The publication was publicly endorsed by Columbia University Apartheid Divest (CUAD), which promotes itself as a New York City-based organization supporting Palestinian liberation. CUAD announced the release of the newspaper via Instagram, stating: “Columbia SJP’s first ever print paper ‘The Columbia Intifada’ is available at today’s READ-IN at BUTLER LIBRARY 301! We’re distributing 1,000 copies — get them while you can! From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.” In response, Columbia University issued a strongly worded statement condemning the association of its name with the publication, saying, “Using the Columbia name for a publication that glorifies violence and makes individuals in our community feel targeted in any way is a breach of our values. As we have said repeatedly, discrimination and promoting violence or terror is not acceptable and antithetical to what our community stands for.” The university added that it is investigating the matter through its appropriate offices and policies. The paper has also drawn criticism from political and organizational leaders. Representative Ritchie Torres, D-N.Y., expressed his disapproval on X, formerly Twitter, writing, “Columbia University is so embedded in Anti-Israel propaganda that it has a publication entitled ‘The Columbia Intifada.’ What is needed in our society is a revolution of the responsible against the Intifada idiocy of the far left.” Jonathan Greenblatt, CEO of the Anti-Defamation League, also criticized the publication, calling it “beyond offensive.” He stated, “It’s a provocation. It’s an incitement. It’s a not-so-veiled threat against Jewish & Israeli students. Columbia can’t just condemn; the administration must hold the culprits accountable.” The controversy has brought national attention to Columbia University, highlighting tensions over free speech, campus activism, and the broader implications of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Based on a report by NBC 2024-12-31

President-elect Donald Trump, known for his bold rhetoric during the campaign trail, has recently tempered his grandiose promises as he transitions to governing. Throughout his campaign, Trump pledged sweeping actions, such as quickly reducing costs, resolving the Ukraine war even before taking office, and using tariffs to boost the U.S. economy and manufacturing. However, since his victory in November's election, he has suggested that fulfilling these commitments may prove more challenging than initially portrayed. In a recent interview on "Meet the Press," Trump admitted he could not guarantee that tariffs wouldn't lead to higher consumer prices. During a separate interview with *Time* magazine, where he was honored as Person of the Year, Trump acknowledged the complexities of lowering costs. “It’s difficult to bring down the cost of groceries once they’ve gone up,” he conceded. Similarly, during his first post-election press conference from Mar-a-Lago in Palm Beach, Florida, Trump signaled that resolving the war in Ukraine might be even more complex than managing tensions in the historically volatile Middle East. Critics, including Democrats, were quick to interpret these remarks as a backpedaling of campaign promises. Some suggested Trump was lowering expectations or reneging on his commitments. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) highlighted this sentiment, posting on X, “Candidate Trump promised to lower grocery prices, but now it seems he isn’t even going to try.” She added, “While champagne corks pop at Mar-a-Lago, President-elect Trump says that he can’t really lower grocery prices because it’s ‘very hard.’ Sad. It’s the start of a broken promise.” Nonetheless, Trump’s allies defended his shift in tone, framing it as a natural transition from campaign rhetoric to the more nuanced responsibilities of governing. “The American people re-elected President Trump by a resounding margin, giving him a mandate to implement the promises he made on the campaign trail. He will deliver,” said Karoline Leavitt, a spokesperson for the transition team and incoming White House press secretary. One Trump ally dismissed accusations of inconsistency, asserting that the president-elect was merely moving away from the dramatic sales pitch typical of campaigns. Trump himself suggested a pragmatic outlook when asked if his presidency would be considered a failure if costs didn’t decline. “Look, they got them up. I’d like to bring them down. It’s hard to bring things down once they’re up,” he said. “But I think that they will. I think energy is going to bring them down. I think a better supply chain is going to bring them down. You know, the supply chain is still broken.” In other areas of foreign affairs, Trump has oscillated between his characteristic bombast and newfound pragmatism. He floated provocative ideas such as suggesting Canada become the 51st U.S. state and revisiting American control of the Panama Canal, alongside revisiting Greenland’s acquisition as a "necessity." Analysts speculate these statements could be part of strategic negotiating tactics aimed at leveraging trade and tariffs to benefit the U.S. Regarding the Ukraine conflict, Trump appeared to step back from his earlier debate-stage assertion that he would end the war “before even becoming president.” This week, he told reporters that resolving the Ukraine-Russia war would likely be more challenging than managing tensions in the Middle East, a region rife with conflicts involving Israel, Iran, and Syria. While Democrats frame these shifts as early evidence of broken promises, Trump and his team argue that the adjustments reflect a realistic approach to governing—a balance between ambition and practicality. As the president-elect prepares to take office, the weight of global complexities and domestic challenges appears to be shaping his approach to the promises that energized his campaign. Based on a report by The Hill 2024-12-31

Perched on the scenic Northumberland coast, Alnmouth Village Golf Club, one of the UK's oldest golf establishments, is grappling with a grave threat to its future—rising sea levels and coastal erosion. Established in 1869 by renowned Scottish golfer Mungo Park, the club holds the distinction of being the oldest nine-hole links course in the country. However, its historic status and breathtaking location now hang in the balance as tidal storms and relentless waves encroach upon its grounds. The club has already lost 10 meters of land to the sea, a stark reminder of the increasing impact of climate change. Ian Garrett, a representative of the club, highlighted the severity of the situation, saying, "We're facing a serious challenge to the history of the club. Tidal storms and coastal erosion have increased in frequency over the last decade." Efforts are underway to mitigate the damage, with timber sea defences being restored and repaired. Wooden groynes, designed to limit sediment movement and slow erosion, aim to collect sand and form a natural barrier against the advancing waves. Yet concerns persist about the long-term efficacy of these measures. "This affects the whole bay," Garrett warned, emphasizing the broader implications for the area. "That potentially means significant funding. There's a far bigger challenge here." Alnmouth Village Golf Club’s plight underscores a wider issue affecting coastal communities across the UK. The acceleration of coastal erosion, driven by rising sea levels and more frequent storms, poses a growing threat. A spokesperson from the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) acknowledged the scale of the problem, noting the government’s commitment of £2.4 billion over the next two years to bolster flood and erosion defenses. Additionally, a newly established Flood Resilience Taskforce is tasked with enhancing preparation and protection efforts nationwide. However, Alnmouth faces unique challenges due to its private ownership. The financial burden for its upkeep falls squarely on the patrons, limiting access to public funding. Club member Tim Irwin stressed the significance of the golf course beyond its recreational purpose. "It's very important to this community," he said. "It provides jobs and tourism, bringing a lot of income into the local community." The situation has sparked broader discussions about how the UK’s coastline can be managed in the face of climate change. The climate campaign group One Home argues that difficult decisions must be made about what can and cannot be preserved along the coastline. As Alnmouth Village Golf Club fights for its survival, it stands as a poignant symbol of the challenges faced by communities that rely on the sea for their livelihoods and heritage. The question remains: how much can be saved, and at what cost? Based on a report by Sky News 2024-12-31

Labour is facing renewed controversy over its education policies as plans emerge to overhaul the national curriculum in England to better reflect the "diversity" of modern Britain. Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson has ordered a review, labeling the current curriculum as "outdated" and emphasizing the need for changes that address the "diversities of our society." The review's terms of reference indicate a focus on ensuring that every child feels represented in their education and has access to a broad range of subjects. Reports suggest unions and teaching organizations have urged a "decolonization" of curriculum content deemed "monocultural." This announcement comes amid backlash against Labour’s other recent educational reforms, including the introduction of a 20 percent VAT on private school fees, a policy that took effect this week. Defending the move, Ms. Phillipson claimed to represent "pushy middle-class parents" who are largely unable to afford independent schooling. “The average private school fee has reached the considerable sum of about £18,000 a year,” Phillipson remarked. “Middle-class parents in good professional jobs with housing costs just can't afford that level of fee, and they want brilliant state schools. This policy allows us to raise more money to invest in what really matters for families.” Her comments were met with outrage. Critics accused her of class warfare, with campaigners arguing that the policy unfairly targets families from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds who rely on independent schools. Dr. Julie Robinson, chief executive of the Independent Schools Council, countered: “The majority of our schools are far removed from the stereotype of independent education propagated by the Government. A typical independent school is a small day school that does not have the means to cut their budget by a fifth to absorb this unprecedented tax. The families who choose these schools come from a variety of backgrounds, including middle-class incomes.” Meanwhile, Shadow Education Secretary Laura Trott criticized the curriculum review, suggesting Labour’s focus was misplaced. “Instead of spending time fiddling with our academic curriculum, which has led to English children being the best at maths and English in the Western world, the DfE needs to concentrate on getting absence rates down and kids back in the classroom.” Professor Becky Francis, appointed to lead the curriculum review in July, has emphasized a balanced approach, promising to consider how proposed changes might affect teachers' workloads. The Department for Education (DfE) has also stressed that the review will aim for "evolution, not revolution." As the debate continues, Labour's reforms face scrutiny from critics and supporters alike. Shadow Foreign Secretary Priti Patel accused Ms. Phillipson of being a "Left-wing ideologue," stating, “This is more gaslighting from this socialist government that has broken its general election promises. The most socialist Government since the 1970s.' With the Government’s curriculum overhaul and tax reforms both sparking fierce opposition, the broader implications of these policies on education and social equity remain a contentious topic. Based on a report by Daily Mail 2024-12-31 Related Topics: Looming Crisis: Private Schools Face Closures Amid VAT Hike Top Oxfordshire Prep School to Close Amid Controversial VAT Policy on Private Education

Dozens of doctors struck off the UK’s medical register for severe professional misconduct—including life-altering errors, sexual assault, and financial dishonesty—continue to operate abroad. Vulnerable patients, often unaware of these doctors’ histories, remain at risk as these individuals evade scrutiny and accountability. Orthopaedic surgeon Dr. Yaser Jabbar is among those who have faced significant backlash in Britain. While treating over 700 patients at Great Ormond Street Hospital, Jabbar left several children with life-altering injuries, including uneven leg lengths and the need for amputations. Suspended in 2022 following a wave of complaints, Jabbar has since relocated to Dubai, where he continues to operate on unsuspecting patients. Former NHS neurosurgery specialist Sam Eljamel also left a trail of devastation. His botched operations caused life-changing injuries, including one case where he removed a patient’s tear duct instead of a brain tumor. Suspended in 2013, Eljamel moved to Libya, where he now practices while boasting about his time in Britain. Dr. Ajit Joe Pothen, a Dutch head and neck surgeon, was hired by Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust despite being under suspension in the Netherlands. Shortly after beginning his role, Pothen discharged a patient at "significant risk," who later died. Struck off the register, he now operates privately in Germany. In another shocking case, Italian surgeon Luigi Angelini, formerly of Southend Hospital, was struck off after repeatedly making dangerous and inappropriate surgical decisions. Despite a 2008 tribunal criticizing his irresponsible care, Angelini now practices in Dubai, performing procedures such as liver and colon surgeries. Surgeon Anjan Kumar Banerjee falsified research data to secure a degree and was found guilty of financial misconduct. After being removed from the medical register in 2002, Banerjee was reinstated five years later under the name Swapu Banerjee. He resumed practicing and even received an MBE for "patient safety," though the honor was later revoked. Dr. Stoyan Tsonchev returned to Bulgaria after being struck off for numerous failings, including discharging a patient with a cannula still in their arm and inappropriate behavior toward a nurse. Despite showing no remorse or insight into his actions, Tsonchev continues to work in Sofia, citing Bulgaria’s less stringent regulations. Hair transplant surgeon Juan Ruiz Alconero, unlicensed in the UK, was struck off for botched procedures that left patients disfigured. He has since returned to Spain, where he operates a private clinic. Italian cosmetic surgeon Dr. Arnaldo Paganelli, known for botched operations and working without insurance, was struck off in 2020 but remains active in Italy. His malpractice left patients with unresolved injuries and no compensation. Dr. Zulfiquar Rahimtoola, a hand surgeon, was suspended for cutting into the wrong side of a patient’s wrist and lying to cover it up. Despite this, a review in 2022 allowed him to resume practicing, claiming there was no significant risk of recurrence. This troubling pattern underscores the global loopholes enabling disgraced doctors to evade consequences and jeopardize patient safety. Their continued practice raises critical questions about the oversight and regulation of medical professionals worldwide. Based on a report by Daily Mail 2024-12-30

Italian journalist Cecilia Sala, a prominent voice in international reporting, has been detained in Iran under mysterious circumstances. According to the Italian Foreign Ministry, Sala was arrested on December 19, 2024, and is currently being held in solitary confinement at Tehran’s infamous Evin Prison. Her arrest, coming after nearly a week of reporting on critical issues in Iran, has drawn international condemnation and intensified concerns about the state of press freedom in the country. The Italian government confirmed Sala’s detention on December 27, noting that its ambassador in Tehran conducted a consular visit to assess her condition. While the reason for her arrest remains unclear, authorities disclosed that she has been allowed to contact her family twice since her incarceration. Cecilia Sala, known for her investigative prowess, works for Chora Media and Il Foglio newspaper. Her recent reporting focused on Iran's complex social, economic, and political landscape. Among her assignments were interviews with a female comedian who had experienced imprisonment in Evin, a former commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Quds Force (IRGC-QF), and a young woman challenging Iran's conservative societal norms. Highlighting the chilling reality of her arrest, Sala’s editor at Il Foglio remarked, “Journalism is not a crime, and for once, writing it is not rhetoric but a living, real, and frightening reality.” The editor further noted that Sala’s detention is an attack on “everything that the West considered transversally untouchable: our freedom.” Sala’s arrest underscores a broader pattern in Iran, a country consistently ranked among the worst in the world for press freedom. The Islamic Republic is notorious for targeting journalists, activists, and dual citizens, often using them as leverage in geopolitical negotiations. This strategy came into stark focus just one day before Sala’s detention, when Italian authorities in Milan arrested a 38-year-old Iranian man. He faces extradition to the United States for allegedly supporting the IRGC by supplying electronic components used in drones, which were linked to a deadly attack on U.S. forces. While his identity remains undisclosed, the U.S. Justice Department had charged him and another individual days earlier for aiding the construction of lethal weapons. As the international community rallies behind Cecilia Sala, her case serves as a stark reminder of the risks journalists face in authoritarian regimes. The demand for her immediate release echoes the belief that freedom of the press is a cornerstone of democracy, and her detention represents a direct assault on this principle. “Journalism is not a crime,” her editor emphasized, encapsulating the urgent call for justice in her case. Based on a report by Reuters | FDD 2024-12-30

In Salinas, California, a sleek, van-sized aircraft with twelve electric rotors whirred into the sky above an artichoke field. Controlled remotely from a nearby trailer, the 10-minute test flight marked a significant milestone for Archer Aviation. The company is one of several racing to turn a long-imagined dream into reality: a world where commuters can bypass gridlocked traffic in electric air taxis. Roger Connor, curator of the vertical flight collection at the Smithsonian’s National Air and Space Museum, highlighted the allure of these technologies. “They have created these amazing new aircraft that really 10 or 15 years ago would’ve been unimaginable,” Connor said. “Who hasn’t wished... something could drop into your cul-de-sac and 15 minutes later you’re at the office?” The rapid advancement of battery and tilt-rotor technology has brought eVTOLs tantalizingly close to commercial viability. Both Archer and Joby envision their aircraft playing key roles at high-profile events like the 2028 Olympics in Los Angeles. Yet, the transition from futuristic novelty to widespread commuter solution faces substantial challenges. To scale the industry, companies will need billions of dollars in investment, not only for aircraft production but also for building networks of vertiports and charging stations. Despite the enthusiasm, some high-profile ventures have stumbled. Plans for air taxis at the Paris Olympics fell through, and in November, German eVTOL company Lilium filed for insolvency. Still, major players remain optimistic. Archer and Joby have attracted funding from giants like Stellantis, Toyota, and Boeing, while airlines including American, Delta, Southwest, and United are forging partnerships with eVTOL startups. Adam Goldstein, CEO of Archer Aviation, sees this moment as transformative. “It feels like the modern-day American Dream, where you can invent a technology and actually bring it to market even [if it’s] as crazy as what some people call flying cars.” The federal government has also signaled its support. Congress included provisions for eVTOLs in the FAA’s 2024 reauthorization bill, and the agency recently released standards for pilot training and certification. In a 2023 speech, President-elect Donald Trump underscored the strategic importance of air taxis, declaring, “Just as the United States led the automobile revolution in the last century, I want to ensure that America, not China, leads the revolution in air mobility.” While doubts persist about the commercial scalability of air taxis, the industry’s promise remains undeniable. Quieter, greener, and battery-powered aircraft could revolutionize travel, turning what once seemed like science fiction into a modern commuting reality. Whether these companies can overcome financial, logistical, and regulatory hurdles will determine if electric air taxis truly take flight as a viable business. Based on a report by WP 2024-12-30

Finnish authorities have moved a seized tanker suspected of damaging a critical undersea cable closer to port as investigations into the incident intensify. The vessel, which came under scrutiny following disruptions to a subsea communication link between Finland and Estonia, is now positioned to facilitate further examination. Officials suspect the tanker’s anchor may have played a role in the damage, which occurred in early October and disrupted essential communication and data flow in the region. Finnish investigators seized the vessel after evidence suggested its potential involvement in the incident. The move closer to port allows for a more thorough inspection of the ship and its equipment. Finnish Prime Minister Petteri Orpo has emphasized the importance of uncovering the cause of the damage, highlighting the critical nature of undersea infrastructure to national and regional security. “We are treating this matter with the utmost seriousness, given the implications for communication and energy security,” Orpo stated. The undersea cable in question is vital for internet connectivity and secure data transmission between Finland and its neighbors. Its disruption prompted heightened vigilance across the Nordic and Baltic regions, with officials warning of potential vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure. Authorities continue to analyze evidence collected from the vessel, including its logs, routes, and equipment. The Finnish Border Guard, which is leading the investigation, has indicated that international cooperation may be required as the probe progresses. While no charges have been filed against the tanker’s operators, Finnish officials are working to determine whether negligence or intentional actions led to the damage. The investigation underscores the challenges of safeguarding essential infrastructure in an era of heightened geopolitical tension and technological dependence. The outcome of the inquiry could have significant implications for maritime operations and security policies across the region. Based on a report by Reuters 2024-12-30

A sweeping new poll has revealed a seismic shift in the UK’s political landscape, suggesting Labour could lose nearly 200 seats in the next general election, leaving the country on course for a hung parliament. This constituency-by-constituency analysis, conducted by the think tank More in Common for *The Sunday Times*, points to a fracturing of the traditional two-party system and a significant rise in support for smaller parties like Reform UK. Sir Keir Starmer, who secured a resounding victory less than six months ago, could find his government’s dominance short-lived. Labour won 411 seats in what some critics dubbed a “loveless landslide” in July, but if another election were held today, the analysis predicts Labour would win just 228 seats. This represents a loss of 87 seats to the Conservatives, 67 to Reform UK, and 26 to the Scottish National Party (SNP). Labour’s “red wall” gains in northern England would be almost entirely wiped out, with Reform emerging as the primary beneficiary. The analysis, by the think tank More in Common created with survey data of more than 11,000 people, Labour would still emerge as the largest party in parliament, its margin over the Conservatives would be razor-thin, holding only six more seats. The analysis forecasts the Conservatives would win 222 seats, Reform 72, the Liberal Democrats 58, the SNP 37, and the Green Party two. This fragmentation of votes underscores a dramatic acceleration of electoral shifts since the last general election. Reform UK’s meteoric rise to prominence is one of the most striking elements of the analysis. The party, previously seen as a minor player, would now become the third-largest force in Westminster. Angela Rayner, alongside six other cabinet members, is projected to lose her seat, emphasizing the extent of Labour’s potential losses. The implied national vote share further highlights the political volatility. Labour is predicted to capture just 25% of the vote, trailing the Conservatives at 26%. Reform would claim 21%, with the Liberal Democrats at 14%, the Greens at 8%, the SNP at 2%, and other parties collectively garnering 3%. Such an outcome would result in an unstable parliament where no single party could form a majority government. To secure a majority in the House of Commons, a party needs at least 326 seats out of the possible 650—a number no party is forecast to achieve. The analysis suggests Britain may be entering an era of coalition politics, akin to systems seen in countries like Ireland, France, and Germany. “This is a watershed moment for the UK,” remarked a spokesperson for More in Common. “The dominance of the two major parties is eroding, and we’re seeing a shift towards a more fragmented, multiparty system.” In Europe, such trends are already entrenched. France and Germany are preparing for fresh elections in the new year, with Ireland and the Netherlands operating under ongoing coalition arrangements. If the UK follows this path, the stability of single-party governments may soon become a relic of the past. The findings cast doubt on Labour’s ability to retain its majority and signal a dramatic realignment of British politics. For Sir Keir Starmer and his party, the challenge ahead is clear: reversing this trend or navigating the complexities of coalition politics in an increasingly fragmented landscape. Based on a report by Sunday Times 2024-12-30

Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani faces an uphill battle as a federal judge signaled that an upcoming contempt hearing might not bode well for him. The case stems from a $148 million defamation award granted to two Georgia election workers, whom Giuliani falsely accused of ballot tampering during the 2020 presidential election. The hearing, scheduled for next Friday, could have significant financial and legal consequences for Giuliani. Judge Lewis J. Liman of Manhattan issued an order on Friday expressing frustration with Giuliani’s apparent lack of compliance in providing information about his assets. Liman dismissed what he described as attempts by Giuliani and his lawyer to sidestep requests from the election workers' attorneys. The judge made it clear that Giuliani and his legal team must come prepared to justify why Liman should not grant adverse inferences based on evidence in the case. Such a decision could jeopardize Giuliani’s Palm Beach, Florida, condominium, which he has claimed as his personal residence and shielded from the defamation judgment. The case also includes a January 16 trial to determine the fate of Giuliani’s Florida home and other possessions, such as World Series rings. The election workers’ lawyers filed the contempt request after accusing Giuliani of failing to produce several assets, including a Manhattan apartment lease, a Mercedes, luxury watches, jewelry, and sports memorabilia like a signed Joe DiMaggio shirt. These items were ordered to be turned over in October. Despite these legal setbacks, Giuliani’s lawyers remain optimistic, predicting they will eventually reclaim custody of the items through appeals. However, the contempt hearing follows a contentious November court appearance in which Giuliani expressed anger at Judge Liman, accusing him of unfair treatment. Giuliani, a former federal prosecutor and one-time personal attorney for Donald Trump, was found liable last year for defaming the Georgia election workers. He falsely alleged that the workers smuggled in fraudulent ballots in suitcases, counted ballots multiple times, and tampered with voting machines. The baseless claims subjected the election workers to death threats and harassment, profoundly impacting their lives. In his order, Judge Liman emphasized the seriousness of Giuliani’s defiance. The possibility of losing significant assets looms large as the contempt hearing approaches, signaling further consequences in the long-running legal battle. A request for comment from Giuliani’s lawyer went unanswered, adding another layer of uncertainty to an already fraught situation. Based on a report by NYP 2024-12-30

BetterUp, a Silicon Valley life coaching startup valued at $5 billion, has faced sharp criticism from current and former employees, who have described its workplace culture as a “toxic train wreck.” The company, which employs the Duke of Sussex, Prince Harry, as its chief impact officer, has drawn scrutiny for its alleged “psychologically unsafe” environment. Prince Harry, appointed to his role in March 2021, has been a prominent advocate for the company’s mission, even describing his personal experience with a BetterUp coach as “invaluable.” Reflecting on his coaching journey after stepping back from royal duties, he said, “I was matched with a truly awesome coach who has given me sound advice and a fresh perspective.” His positive experience led him to extend BetterUp services to staff at the Archewell Foundation, the organization he runs with the Duchess of Sussex. However, despite the Duke’s public endorsement, reviews from employees have painted a contrasting picture of the workplace culture. On Glassdoor, a platform that promotes workplace transparency, the company has a rating of just 2.9 out of five stars based on over 600 reviews. Alarmingly, only 35% of reviewers said they would recommend BetterUp to a friend. Employees have voiced concerns about an environment where many feel “uncomfortable and living in fear.” One worker described the leadership team as an “elitist club of leaders” with “no moral compass” and a glaring “lack of self-awareness.” Another former employee branded BetterUp a “literal circus” in a review, criticizing the executive leadership for being “detached from everyone else” and prone to “constantly shifting strategy.” The challenges of breaking into BetterUp’s perceived “inner circle” were also highlighted. “If you’re not in the inner circle, good luck to you,” a review from September noted, reflecting what many see as a culture of exclusivity. BetterUp’s CEO and co-founder, Alexi Robichaux, who offered the Duke his position after being introduced through a mutual acquaintance in 2020, has repeatedly defended the company and its mission. He has praised Prince Harry for his “model of inspiration and impact through action,” noting that the Duke’s commitment to helping others aligns with the company’s goals of empowering people to reach their full potential. Despite the Duke’s optimism, the negative feedback from employees has cast a shadow on his first significant business role since leaving the UK. BetterUp’s mission of “equipping people to thrive” may face hurdles as the company works to address internal criticisms and repair its public image. Based on a report by Daily Telegraph 2024-12-30

Conservative MP Jonathan Williamson has announced plans to initiate a no-confidence motion that could potentially unseat Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s government by the end of January. Williamson revealed in a social media post that he intends to present the motion at a public accounts committee meeting on January 7. If the committee approves the motion, it will move to the House of Commons when Parliament reconvenes on January 27. A vote could take place as early as January 30, paving the way for an immediate federal election if the motion succeeds. While previous no-confidence motions from the Conservatives have failed—three such attempts were rejected during the fall—this time, the dynamics appear to have shifted. NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh, who previously opposed these motions, has now signaled his readiness to support one. Singh’s change of heart comes in the wake of Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland’s unexpected resignation from cabinet, a move that has added to the political turbulence. Freeland’s departure has raised questions about the stability of Trudeau’s administration, with critics pointing to it as a sign of deeper fractures within the government. Singh’s alignment with the Conservatives on this issue could prove pivotal, as the Liberals lack a majority in the House of Commons. Should the motion pass, it would result in the dissolution of Parliament and prompt a snap election. The outcome could significantly reshape Canada’s political landscape, with both Conservatives and New Democrats poised to capitalize on voter dissatisfaction with Trudeau’s government. As the January timeline approaches, all eyes will be on the public accounts committee and subsequent debates in the House of Commons. The no-confidence motion represents the most serious threat to Trudeau’s tenure since the Liberals formed their minority government. Based on a report by Global News CA 2024-12-30