.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
dick dasterdly
-
Posts
8,959 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by dick dasterdly
-
-
- Popular Post
5 minutes ago, petemoss said:Is it not against Forum rules to post fake quotes?
Don't worry, just press the 'report' button - as I'm sure you've already done....
What is wrong with you people that you resort to the report button, rather than come up with an argument against???
-
3
-
- Popular Post
11 minutes ago, nontabury said:The last sentence spoilt your post. Yes we have a great deal in common with our European neighbours, but definitely not with the E.u.
We could have lived with the trading block called the EEC, a pact that was voted on by the British people. Unfortunately since that time,we have come to realise,we were conned by the political and elitist class, who all along intended to impose a political, and what many consider a non Democratic union on the unsuspecting people.
Anyone with a brain cell would have realised that the CAP policy was only ever going to result in higher prices for citizens.
The consequent mutation (along with the 'champagne' expenditure) needs to be curbed - but the eu elite have made it very clear that they have no intention of doing so.
-
3
-
Something has gone seriously wrong with new notifications....
-
1
-
-
Can we get back on topic as to the supposedly uk debt to the eu of 39 bn ????.
-
1
-
-
We all know that politicians (both in the uk and in the eu) are only interested in their own, personal wealth and power. ☹️
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
I'd add that the eu 'team' has stated that they are not prepared to re-negotiate....
I'm pretty sure they're lying, in the same way as uk politicians who are desperately looking for a way to remain - without losing their seats.....
-
3
-
- Popular Post
And it all boils down to Hunt's idea (a known remainer....) of a 'better deal' than the eu/may surrender treaty....
Personally, I'm willing to bet that it boils down to the same deal, worded slightly differently.....
-
3
-
This may well be true, but probably better not to use the Sun as a source.
Having said this, nowadays I don't trust any of the 'papers as they're so obviously biased - and therefore little better than the Sun ☹️.
-
2
-
1
-
-
24 minutes ago, welovesundaysatspace said:
It says a lot about people when they consider such behavior as a normal incident that happens “on a regular basis” in every household. Even more concerning that they seem to abuse their partner over issues such as “the central heating or who turned the thermostat up or down”. I’m wondering how they deal with real problems. Not surprised this is coming out of the mouth of a cheapish dressed bird who looks like she’s on her walk of shame while visiting a Donald Dumb rally.
No, this does not happen between civilized people. Only the riff-raff considers this normal.
"No, this does not happen between civilized people. Only the riff-raff considers this normal."
Wow, so you now consider boris' privileged background to be "riff-raff"??????
-
1 hour ago, evadgib said:
In the time (3 seconds?) he had in which to react all he could have been sure of was that he was tackling an adult in a red dress.
As for weapony; I don't want to go too far in that direction other than to say mobiles (or anything else carried by a woman in evening attire) can be deceptive...
I'm only replying because I respect you as a poster.
The woman in question clearly didn't have a "concealed semi-automatic" under her dress - and if she did, it would have taken an age to reveal and construct.....
Never mind how you look at it IMO, this is a case where the security services failed when they allowed her to enter - and a junior minister who suddenly felt 'brave' (????) when confronted with a middle-aged woman that annoyed him.
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
18 minutes ago, evadgib said:They're bleating now the boot's on t'other foot:
The same thought had crossed my mind. The neighbours can now expect their attitudes and lives to be examined by the media - and they will not appreciate it.....
-
3
-
1
-
20 hours ago, Bluespunk said:
No, it’s not.
Eire tried to reach an agreement with the U.K. after the brexit vote as they, unlike the tories, immediately realised the implications for the Good Friday Agreement.
They even offered an ad hoc arrangement, where issues that affected it could be dealt with on a case by case basis.
With the ineptitude that has been typical of the tories handling of brexit, they did nothing.
Eire then went to the EU member states and ensured that a mechanism to ameliorate the consequences of brexit on the Good Friday Agreement was part of any deal.
Eire is not the backwater noddy state that so many brexiteers portray it as, when they say the backdoor was forced on Eire.
It is the result of Eire protecting its own interests and tory incompetence.
11 hours ago, puipuitom said:Maybe time to read ?
18 jan. 2019 - It was a UK proposal, not one tabled by Ireland or the EU, and reflected ... are with Britain rather than with Northern Ireland, moving the customs border ... 'If there is a hard Brexit we will definitely see gaps on shelves' · EU has ...1 hour ago, nauseus said:Yes, history is often rewritten. But these pieces actually neither prove nor disprove what the EU did.
33 minutes ago, nauseus said:Yes. It says the backstop was a British proposal, that's it!
I apologise for posting so many previous posts - but I've still seen no evidence to support Bluespunks's original assertion. Namely "Eire tried to reach an agreement with the U.K. after the brexit vote".
The links provided are remainer newspaper articles (long after the event), claiming this to be the case.....
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
9 hours ago, puipuitom said:Maybe, just very maybe there are some other slight problems, Brexiteers do not have even the faintest idea about ? ?
Yes, that is certainly the 'line' promoted by remainers who clearly have no idea, when this is the best they can come up with....????
-
2
-
1
-
- Popular Post
Incidentally, I don't appreciate remainers putting me in a position where I feel the need to defend boris (who I don't trust or like) against his remainer neighbours - who are so obviously politically motivated. ☹️
-
2
-
1
-
2 hours ago, vogie said:
And when the police are not interested, and you will not believe this.....most people don't send a recording of it to the Guardian.
50 minutes ago, GeorgeCross said:'most people' don't have the next prime minister living next door!!
i certainly would lol
46 minutes ago, dick dasterdly said:I've no doubt this is true - but only if you disagreed with their stance/politics etc.....
38 minutes ago, stevenl said:Or don't like him, or have enough of continuous noise pollution, or don't like seeing women abused, or ...
Agree entirely with your first point "Or don't like him" ???? - as this seems to be the case.
The rest of your suggestions are pure imagination with no evidence at all.
Much like your post that the neighbours were brexiteers.....
-
1
-
1
-
-
- Popular Post
3 hours ago, geoffbezoz said:I doubt he is doing it on purpose but no doubt that is his chances to become the most right wing Tory PM ever gone to the wind. Irrespective of whether he was taped, overheard is beside the point, the fact is it happened and he is staying silent. In public life even your private life must be beyond reproach in order to gain the confidence of his supporters and the country. Whilst of course the extreme facist right wing of the party will always support him for the PM's position, irrespective of his misdemeanors, I would seriously suggest that of the 160,000 conservative members entitled to vote , then by far the vast majority will not only be appalled by his antics, they will also consider that he will drag British politics down further, if that is possible.
So its bye bye BJ and hello Johnson I would anticipate.
36 minutes ago, geoffbezoz said:Wondering why you think repeating yourself (with no explanatory comment) is a good idea?
-
4
-
1
-
1
-
3
-
5 minutes ago, tebee said:
But then neither is boris .....
I agree re. boris, but edited my post whilst you were posting re. hunt's 'position'.....
-
- Popular Post
2 hours ago, wayned said:If the UK tries to stay and Boris is PM, the EU will probably pay the UK 39 billion to leave!
Let's hope so! ????
-
3
-
2
-
2 hours ago, GeorgeCross said:
you do know the other guy (Hunt) is a brexiteer too? in fact he was quotes yesterday as saying:
thats the same policy stance as Boris.. Negotiate or No Deal
so, are you actually saying there is a remainer plot to get Boris ruled out so the other brexiter can force a no deal too?
do you realize how idiotic that sounds??!
maybe Hunt will throw his toys out of his pram next and we'll have no leader ????♀️
i'd say Boris is doing his best to throw this, without ruining his career, because he doesn't want the poison chalice. either that or he really is a buffoon lol
Hunt is not a brexiteer.
A link please to where he stated that "he would “100%” leave the EU at the end of October with no deal if he believed the EU was not willing to compromise."
Edit - Thinking about this for another minute, my mistake. He may well have said this, as his version of "compromise" is probably the eu/May surrender treaty with a slight change in wording that makes no difference at all......
-
- Popular Post
Just now, GeorgeCross said:'most people' don't have the next prime minister living next door!!
i certainly would lol
I've no doubt this is true - but only if you disagreed with their stance/politics etc.....
-
3
-
- Popular Post
31 minutes ago, stevenl said:You didn't hear yet? They were not lefties but brexiteers that don't trust bj to deliver.
Link please, because from everything I've read they are remainers.
-
6
-
1
-
13 hours ago, evadgib said:
As seen by a Sandhurst trained Military Intelligence officer (Retd):
Except this middle-aged woman clearly wasn't "armed with a concealed semi-automatic"....
Another 'if the circumstances were entirely different' argument......
-
17 hours ago, Baerboxer said:
Usual Labor hypocritical hyperbole!
When their Deputy PM, 2-Jags Prescott, thumped a protester who cracked an egg on him they didn't clamor for his suspension or sacking!
The security at that venue should not have allowed the protesters in. They should have been removed, forcibly if necessary.
They have no right to trespass, disrupt and assault.
"The security at that venue should not have allowed the protesters in."
I agree entirely with this point. Why on earth did the security allow the protester into the event?
22 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:If the woman had been any threat to his safety he wouldn't have gone near her.
I agree equally strongly with this point.
-
- Popular Post
7 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:And he has a sovereign veto on any deal the UK wants with the EU.
The eu has already made it very clear that it has no interest in talking trade or coming up with a reasonable deal - so this is good news ????.
Shame that he didn't use that veto when the last extension was agreed.....
-
5
-
4
Ireland warns British PM contenders against 'dumbing down' border issue
in World News
Posted
I'm obviously missing something here.
"I find it unhelpful when people attribute quotes to people who never made those quotes."
Precisely which "quotes" (your words) are you stating to be untrue?