- Popular Post
dick dasterdly
-
Posts
8,959 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by dick dasterdly
-
-
2 hours ago, yogi100 said:
They must have convinced the two pikey women to take part in the ruse. You know the one whose hand is seen dipping the bag and her accomplice?
Do you reckon it's a set up and the two supposed thieves are in for a cut of the pay out?
I've heard the Prudential are looking for good claims investigators.
Another poster also questioned why 2 or 3 (likely Romanian) women would participate in this alleged 'scam'?
It's always possible of course, but it seems unlikely.
- 1
-
And the problems have started again....
-
46 minutes ago, Tug said:
Sooo looking for people in distress is bad????gotta call the coast guard quick!oh cant the forget the britts or anyone else looking for people in distress!! All search and rescue must stop!!god evil
"Sooo looking for people in distress is bad????"
Yes - when they are actively looking for hopeful, illegal immigrants - and thereby supporting the traffickers in the TRADE.....
- 1
- 1
-
6 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:
I think if you said most ordinary people are interested in not being poorer you’d be nearer the mark.
A UK/EU trading agreement (you’ll recall Liam Fox referred to it as ‘easiest deal in human history’ cannot happen until the UK leaves the EU.
This has been very clearly stated by the Government and the EU.
For examples of EU trade agreements, refer the recent EU/Japan and very recent EU/South America agreements, each of which took decades to set up.
Good luck selling no-deal to people who have no wish to be worse off.
"A UK/EU trading agreement <snip> cannot happen until the UK leaves the EU."
Of course it can't actually "happen" until the uk leaves the eu!
But it's telling that neither side has even bothered to include this most important point in the negotiations.....
- 2
-
- Popular Post
29 minutes ago, Tug said:Tell ya what bob if I see ya out on the water in distress I’ll just pass ya by ok?some of the comments on this thread are just disgusting as a mariner I would never ever leave someone in distress to drown she did the right thing let the authorities sort the migrants out don’t expect mariners to abandon those in destress
Except the ship was LOOKING for illegal immigrants to rescue.....
Entirely different to another ship/boat on the seas that encountered trouble, and so genuinely needed rescuing for reasons beyond their control.
- 2
- 1
-
3 hours ago, Puwa said:
Here are 10 actual tips for tipping:
1) It's optional.
2) It is as much a social transaction as a financial one. Giver and receiver have roles to play. The giver tips nonchalantly (never ostentatiously), and the receiver wais upon receipt, regardless of the amount. It's ok to simply smile or nod in return.
3) Personally, I never tip anyone who asks for a tip outright, a huge breech of decorum.
4) Traditionally, tipping for meals was a "keep the change" situation. If that's a few coins at a simple shop, fine. Obviously, at nicer or more expensive places, a bit more thought is required when paying for 990B bill with a 1000 note. First get your 10 baht change, then add whatever you want to it.
5) You always give a tip directly to the person, rather than just including extra when you pay, and they always must acknowledge it. This reported phenomenon of servers deciding for themselves to keep the change is entirely unacceptable and no Thai person would stand for that.
6) For most taxis, it's ok just round up to the next 10 baht, or 20, so a 47 baht fare is 50, a 49 becomes 60.
7) A generous tip is appropriate when you rent a van and driver for something like an interprovincial excursion.
???? At a 3-4 star hotel, 20-40 baht per day for the housekeeper isn't required but is greatly appreciated; 5-star maybe 50 and up.
9) Thai people sometimes use the term "tip" as a euphemism for payment for a "special service," as at a massage parlor.
10) This goes a bit beyond tipping. I know there's a popular belief among farang that Thais will do anything for money, but in fact there are a lot of cultural sensitivities around money, especially the handling of cash. Maybe I'm a bit traditional/conservative when it comes to these things, but I tend to follow this old-school practice. In some situations, overtly taking bills from your wallet, counting it out conspicuously, and giving cash hand to hand is considered vulgar and insulting--especially if it is someone with whom you have a personal, professional, intimate, or ongoing relationship. Instead, when possible put the money in an envelope (a great use for hotel-room envelopes). The receiver will will appreciate the gesture.
I agree unreservedly with most of these points.
Re. 10) - I made the mistake of once offering (an obviously very poor guy) 100 bht for helping me out, when I seriously needed help. The horror on his face when I tried to offer him 100 bht. has remained etched in my memory ☹️.
- 2
-
On 6/26/2019 at 9:58 AM, Fairynuff said:
Yet another incorrect generalization. I’d say that I don’t know anyone Thai or European who doesn’t tip when it’s appropriate.I always tip appropriately. If a service charge is included but I’ve had excellent service I’ll add a bit extra. My local noodle shop treats me like family but tipping just isn’t expected. Every now and again I’ll take a tin of cookies or something and always at New Year.
I see nothing wrong in tipping good staff, the extra money will always help people who mostly earn very little. Bad service will never get a tip however.
The car park attendant at a place I eat at fairly often must make a fortune, I’ve honestly never seen anyone not tip him at least 20 baht
I agree, but do give a small tip to the assistant at the 'road-side stall type place' where I frequently buy takeaways - as I'm sure she earns very little and she always goes out of her way to help load the takeaways in my 'bike box. The tip is not expected, but appreciated by both the assistant and owner.
Similarly, I'm happy to provide a small tip to gas station attendants who put the cap back on after filling up, as the cap is on the side of my 'bike making it more difficult to access. Again - poorly paid/provide a service - and I am happy to tip.
When at a HomePro complex one day with a VERY wealthy friend, I was shocked when she wouldn't allow a trolley guy to take her trolley to the car because "he would expect a 20 bht tip".....☹️
To look on the bright side, it made me realise (I can be a bit slow at times...) why the trolley pushers are trying to help even when their help is not needed - and subsequently let them 'help' in order to give them a tip.
-
On 6/26/2019 at 8:37 AM, Netease said:
My wife gives 10% for good service and BHT 1 if the service or food is lousy just to let them know were not happy
My ex-husband left a one cent tip in a very busy American bar (possibly Beale Street - I can't remember as I'm not a blues fan) as the service was so lousy.
He regretted it as he'd left something in the bar, and so had to go back to ask for the bag he'd left ????.
- 1
-
13 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:
Admitted?
When did I ever claim I was british?
Leaver obsession with nationality of posters is nothing but distraction tactics when points are raised they can’t refute.
That and the myth about the EU citizens being worried about uk money.
Hilarious. I’m ok for money thanks.
Again, direct me to posts where I have called anyone “stupid/unintelligent/ignorant”
You're deliberately missing the point that more than a few posters have delayed admitting that they're not brits. - they are from other european countries that will be hurt by the loss of uk money!
- 2
- 1
-
- Popular Post
23 minutes ago, jany123 said:My country is currently complying with international laws regards refugees... so heartless with regards this issue is assuaged by complying with the law. Beyond that, offsetting further guilt at my own lack of ability to influence the refugee issue, by donating to charities, helps.
then more of the same... you cannot take legitimate refugees and return them from whence they fled.... it’s just not done. So... the refugees must be processed to determine the legitimacy of their claim. Sure...Return those that are not legitimate refugees... nil issue with that.
suggesting that refugees be taken to the registered country is totally inappropriate because a great deal of shipping is registered under “flags of convenience”, and these countries may not qualify as safe, or fall under the auspices of the quote conveniently researched by Ozman... thanks again for the assist Ozman.
Look... I honestly don’t know what the solution is, but I do know that the rubbish I’m responding to is not it
In short, a load of waffle in defense of this ship that went out looking for 'refugees' that had paid to be 'abandoned' - having been told that they would be rescued by these ships.....
- 3
-
32 minutes ago, katana said:
"...The vessel had rescued 53 migrants off the coast of Libya..."
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-48809134
If they were off the coast of Libya, why not drop them off in Libya?Maybe the people traffickers will get a long stretch in a nice diversified gaol.
I wish I had your confidence that this will be the case.
- 1
-
- Popular Post
26 minutes ago, dick dasterdly said:Do you seriously believe that anyone considers you anything other than a non-brit remainer?
"If you want a closed shop forum with invitees only, then set one up.
It would be typical brexiteer mindset behaviour to do so."
You're obviously feeling extremely defensive. Try being a 'leaver' who so many of remainers insult as being stupid/unintelligent/ignorant etc. etc.! ????
23 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:I don’t care what you regard me as.
Refute my points based on what I say and not who I am.
One of your cohort has already made the embarrassing error of confusing me with someone else.
Stick to the point and not the person.
Please direct me to my posts where I have called someone “stupid/unintelligent/ignorant” because of their expressed views.
Leavers agree on this point- i.e. address the point rather than relying on calling those with a different POV "stupid/unintelligent/ignorant"!
Edit - Having said this, you've admitted that you're not a brit. and, to be honest, the opinions of other eu nationals only reinforces the likely fact that other eu nations are very worried indeed about the loss of uk money....
- 4
-
Of course you're quite right....
There should be no reason at all why illegal immigrants should not be allowed entry....
And this applies even more particularly to those claiming 'refugee' status.....
-
- Popular Post
50 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:I spent my life in the uk and have many friends and family there.
I have the right to british nationality and have chosen not to take it.
I could exercise the right to vote in brexit referendum/s but have chosen not too.
I hold an eu passport, as I have said on other threads-typical poor research by brexiteers, I could obtain a british one but choose not too.
Therefore I am neither british or a remainer, but someone with a view that I am entitled to express on an open forum, that is a fact brexiteers seem to find very hard to understand.
If you want a closed shop forum with invitees only, then set one up.
It would be typical brexiteer mindset behaviour to do so.
Do you seriously believe that anyone considers you anything other than a non-brit remainer?
"If you want a closed shop forum with invitees only, then set one up.
It would be typical brexiteer mindset behaviour to do so."
You're obviously feeling extremely defensive. Try being a 'leaver' who so many of remainers insult as being stupid/unintelligent/ignorant etc. etc.! ????
- 2
- 2
-
It's more than possible that I'm very wrong - but I suspect most ordinary people are concerned about a trading agreement.
Something that has been put to the bottom of 'the list' by both uk and eu negotiators.....
- 1
-
- Popular Post
42 minutes ago, stephenterry said:We don't have a negotiating position as the EU has made it clear they are not going to reopen the WAG. However, I consider that if Boris softens May's red lines there could be room for manouver, but I doubt that would happen as the ERG wouldn't vote for it.
What the EU has suggested is that the 'political statement' - following acceptance of the WAG, and into the transitional period - could be 'clarified' particularly the Irish backstop on the understanding that when new technology is available, the UK wouldn't be stuck in it forever and a day.
On the other hand, the lack of time for parliament to agree any deal, could mean the rejection of a no-deal (as the only alternative) resulting in a GE.
"We don't have a negotiating position as the EU has made it clear they are not going to reopen the WAG."
Excellent. Which can possibly result in a 'no deal' exit as the eu/May 'surrender treaty' has already been rejected three times by uk politicians who are very aware that they are likely to lose their seats if accepted. ????
- 3
- 1
- 1
-
- Popular Post
53 minutes ago, dick dasterdly said:Perhaps a somewhat increased 'divorce payment' (and no, this does not mean I consider the 39bn even remotely acceptable until proven) in exchange for a favourable trade agreement?
This would suit both sides, but has not even been considered yet.....
49 minutes ago, stevenl said:Where did you read this has not been considered?
By the fact that TRADE negotiations haven't even started, and aren't included in the May/eu 'agreement'?
Personally, I find it odd that zero (?) uk MPs have mentioned this.....
- 3
-
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, TopDeadSenter said:Thank goodness for small mercies. Just make sure they sink it so this can not happen again. If that "captain" ever gets to drive a boat again I'm Ernest Hemingway.
I disagree.
Surely better to use the ship to transport illegal immigrants to their point of origin? Likely cheaper than air fare?
- 6
-
26 minutes ago, Kiwiken said:
These ships are supporting the problem. they pick up refugees off the coast of libya and then bring them to Europe. italy should fly the refugees back where they started. And take this rescue ship out to see and scuttle it in international waters. Destroy the ships they cannot bring them to the European Coasts.
Why on earth should they fly them back'?
Surely better to start confiscating the 'rescue boats' and use those confiscated 'rescue boats' to transport them back to their point of origin?
- 2
-
- Popular Post
1 minute ago, Bluespunk said:Has no relevance.
The points raised are the core of a debate.
It matters not who makes them.
Actually it matter one hell of a lot to those who have spent their lives in the uk, and so have a better idea of the reality.
- 6
-
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, Bluespunk said:Ah, now then, typical off topic brexiteer petulance.
Tell you what, nontabury, explain, in detail, the relevance of my nationality to the topic and I’ll tell you.
Very simple really. Posters from other eu countries are obviously very concerned about the loss of uk money....
- 6
- 1
-
19 minutes ago, luckyluke said:
I am a Johnny Foreigner being Belgian, despite this I feel concerned about Brexit.
This because Brexit can eventually have an impact on my country and thus on myself.
Thank you for being so honest.
- 2
-
- Popular Post
28 minutes ago, Laughing Gravy said:BS (Bluespunk) has already stated he isn't British or that he cares about the UK or EU. So yes he is a Johnny Foreigner who seems to know much better than 17.4 million people. Regardless, it has lots to do with the opinion if you are British or not. If that needs to be explained then that's justification enough.
To be fair, it's understandable that posters from other eu countries are very concerned at losing the uk contribution towards the eu......
- 5
- 1
-
1 hour ago, nontabury said:
Says a key board warrior,who refuses to divulge his nationality.
I think Bluespunk admitted that he was not a brit.?
Having said that, I read it first thing this morning so could be wrong.
- 1
- 2
Female pickpocket gang in London caught on camera stealing Thai tourist’s purse
in Thailand News
Posted
Do you doubt that the culprits are from eastern Europe?