Bkk Brian

RIP. A senseless murder of Charlie Kirk who was in the middle of a debate with any questions put forth answered, either pro or against his views. He leaves behind loving children and a wife. If you are one of those criticizing or blaming the victim, you are part of the problem. Never room for political violence and this should be denounced without blame on him or his previous views. Much like the attempted murder on Trump, Paul Pelosi, or any politician of either affiliation.

Correct, as their main target Chief Negotiator and Senior Hamas Leader Khalil al-hayya said in previous cease fire talks in Jan. "despite suing for an end to the war, the group would continue to pursue Israel’s destruction" The deadliest slaughter of Jews in a single day since the Holocaust was a “military accomplishment” and “a source of pride for our people… to be passed down from generation to generation,” al-Hayya said. Hamas’s top negotiator in the ceasefire and hostage talks said despite suing for an end to the war, the group would continue to pursue Israel’s destruction, looking toward Jerusalem and the Al-Aqsa Mosque as a “compass.” https://www.timesofisrael.com/hamas-leader-touts-ceasefire-as-a-defeat-for-israel-while-hailing-oct-7-atrocities/ Video link: https://x.com/DavidSaranga/status/1879844881352548737

They did, as did Amnesty International and Abbas of the PA Orde Kittrie, a former attorney at the US State Department who now teaches law at Arizona State University, said the effort to change definitions to fit Palestinians’ claims had long been promoted by Ramallah before the issue became supercharged by the Gaza war. In 2011, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas advocated for “the internationalization of the conflict as a legal matter.” “Part of that is, if there’s a crime that you want to accuse Israel of and Israel doesn’t fit the definition, ‘I’ll change the definition,'” said Kittrie, who is also a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. https://www.timesofisrael.com/critics-accused-of-quietly-rewriting-meaning-of-genocide-to-fling-charges-at-israel/

As the source article clearly states: The UN and a number of Western nations have said that they will only consider a ruling by a court that genocide is taking place as authoritative.

The UK government has concluded that Israel is not committing genocide in Gaza but "must do much more" to prevent and alleviate the suffering. Britain's position was clarified by David Lammy, as foreign secretary until a few days ago, in response to questions from the chair of the International Development Committee, Sarah Champion. https://news.sky.com/story/israel-not-committing-genocide-in-gaza-but-casualties-and-destruction-are-utterly-appalling-says-uk-government-13427380

Food aid comes into Gaza free, why is it being sold in markets and why so expensive, who steals it? That bag of flour comes from the UN and is even stamped not for sale, yet it costs $200

Actually Israel may be quite happy with this, shows Greta for what she really is. Anyway, looks like she's headed to the poop deck in this shot.........lol

Awful/heartbreaking, release the hostages including the dead bodies!! After the Hamas terror group released a propaganda video showing Alon Ohel, the hostage’s family says medical experts have told them that he is now blind in one eye. “We were shocked to see Alon’s condition. After consulting with eye specialists in Israel and around the world, it is clear that Alon has lost sight in his right eye,” the family says in a statement. “The frequent blinking we observe indicates severe difficulty focusing and seeing for extended periods,” the family says in a statement released by the Hostages and Missing Families Forum. https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/family-of-hostage-alon-ohel-video-shows-hes-now-blind-in-his-right-eye-hamas-bears-responsibility/

Calling out your false claims is enough without bothering even reading the rest. You do not have to pay any money to view the full articles from both media outlets with the links I provided. Again false. The Hill is free and always has been and the WSJ has an archive link. Again full free access to the full article and again, my post fully addressed the Hamas supporting post I responded to. I have zero need to comment on the rest of your post that has nothing to do with the facts I posted about the terrorists Hamas.

False the links are viewable and fully readable to all and fully addresses the post I responded to

Openly supporting hostage taking murdering Hamas terrorists and neglecting that fact that it uses its own civilians as human shields and happy for the sacrifice of thousands of their deaths: Hamas military leader in Gaza has sent to mediators show, is a calculation that more fighting—and more Palestinian civilian deaths—work to his advantage. “We have the Israelis right where we want them,” "In dozens of messages—reviewed by The Wall Street Journal—that Sinwar has transmitted to cease-fire negotiators, Hamas compatriots outside Gaza and others, he’s shown a cold disregard for human life and made clear he believes Israel has more to lose from the war than Hamas. The messages were shared by multiple people with differing views of Sinwar." In one message to Hamas leaders in Doha, Sinwar cited civilian losses in national-liberation conflicts in places such as Algeria, where hundreds of thousands of people died fighting for independence from France, saying, “these are necessary sacrifices.” https://www.wsj.com/world/middle-east/gaza-chiefs-brutal-calculation-civilian-bloodshed-will-help-hamas-626720e7 https://archive.ph/CAYGJ He is not the only Hamas official to laud civilian sacrifices: Hamas considers two million Gazan civilians, including children, as martyrs, whether they want to be or not. “We are called a nation of martyrs,” said another top Hamas official, Ghazi Hamad. “And we are proud to sacrifice martyrs.” He promised more attacks: “There will be a second, a third, a fourth.” When asked whether he sought the annihilation of Israel, Hamad matter-of-factly replied, “Yes, of course.” https://thehill.com/opinion/international/4295601-human-sacrifice-is-central-to-hamass-strategy/

Where is the answer?

Off topic deflection. This is not about the approved Times of Israel as a link, and like I said, its more factaul than many media outlets: Non AI: The Guardian https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-guardian/ Times of Israel https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/times-of-israel/ You claimed IAGS disputed my post, where is the link to your claim? that link agrees it does not take only scholars

A court decides in each individual case/event not a forum user, you go ahead and suggest whatever you want, I will stick to facts and evidence as it also depends on military goals, there is not one cap that fits all in proportionality

Why? What is wrong with approved links to Israeli media? Times of Israel has a higher factuality rating than many international media. Lame attempt at killing the messenger It is also not disputed by the organization, where do they dispute the membership admittance?