Bkk Brian

Another example of the media pushing the its a conspiracy angle for anyone that doesn't believe the narrative. U.S. government debunks COVID lab-leak conspiracy theory, enraging conspiracy theorists The lab-leak conspiracists were certain that the report would validate their contentions, for which there has never been any valid scientific evidence. https://archive.ph/1EKe8 https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2023-06-26/u-s-government-debunks-covid-lab-leak-conspiracy-theory-enraging-conspiracy-theorists

My pleasure, and yes I agree. There's lots in that timeline that can be referenced for both sides of the debate.

The media of course is responsible for many of the arguments. Those that continue to dismiss one or other of the theories such as this prime example. The COVID lab leak claim isn’t just an attack on science, but a threat to public health https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2024-08-15/column-the-covid-lab-leak-claim-isnt-just-an-attack-on-science-but-a-threat-to-public-health

It was just a lame attempt to blame the messenger WSJ. The same theme was published by Forbes back in Feb Timeline: How The Covid Lab Leak Origin Story Went From 'Conspiracy Theory' To Government Debate https://www.forbes.com/sites/marisadellatto/2023/02/26/timeline-how-the-covid-lab-leak-origin-story-went-from-conspiracy-theory-to-government-debate/ EDIT: Oh look below, another one blaming the messenger.........lol

Well you would disagree, but they are the facts and you will not find any numbers on how many for a particular incident from Rule 14 that requires a full trial with evidence to determine. Again no splitting hairs here just correcting you on the false information you provided here: Not true as my post already stated simple1. It is possible.

Again, I know what the article contents are:

Exactly, anyone who takes the word of Hamas Health Authority at face value with no evidence to present other than hear say and then calls other people callous for not believing them is living in a Hamas propaganda bubble. Bit like that time they said 800 deaths including children in the Al-Ahli hospital in Gaza after an Israeli missile strike, they revised it down to 500, then the US and other European countries stepped in and revised it down to a couple of hundred at the most with some estimates at just 50. To top it all off, it was a Hamas rocket that misfired so their own terrorists did it. The death numbers put on official records did not of course reflect that fact, just more deaths to add no matter how or who killed them to the total.

Its 100% relevant that its a Times article and a fairly good one at that. You give a link to a website that is not the Times but all it has on that page is a copied and pasted Times article. To question why I mentioned it is bizarre. Anyway, its not on topic so has no relevance.

Whom? I believe facts. What a ridiculous question, do you really think I would believe the terrorists Hamas or Hamas supporting media? Back on topic this is about Fews having the wrong data on their latest famine report and as a result removing it from their website.

Another one, fortunately survived. Man, 67, 'intentionally' burned in New York's Penn Station A man was burned inside Manhattan's Penn Station train terminal on Friday, just days after a woman was set ablaze inside a Brooklyn subway car. Metropolitan Transportation Authority police received a report of a man on fire at the transit hub just before 8pm, and when officers arrived on the scene, they found a 67-year-old man on fire near the entrance to the subway, according to the New York Daily News. He had burn injuries to both her legs and upper body, which a fire department spokesman told the New York Times were serious but not life threatening. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14231583/Man-intentionally-burned-New-York-Penn-Station.html

So this is wrong? Pretty sure its 100% accurate

Surrender and release all the hostages — including SEVEN AMERICANS — or meet the same fate as Sinwar and Nasrallah. There’s no turning back. https://x.com/RepBrianMast/status/1872744415233454254

That site as you know has just copied an article from the Times from August and before the budget, not sure how relevant that is now over Reeves misleading the public over NI increases?

What battles would those be? Discussing what he can fight for or not is off topic, the topic is not about discussing another member and what he can or cannot do, so I suggest that instead of talking for him you make your own on topic posts. In addition, please do not snip my posts out of context. Also against the rules.

You made a claim that they deliberately kill civilians, you have no proof to that claim and it is perfectly legal for civilians to die in a strike based on International Law. This has been discussed numerous times in other topics. Your last claim is also totally wrong. You do not have to be a signatory to have an arrest warrant out, be arrested, face trial and if found guilty face a judgement.

Ah so an ipsos poll is now fickle.............lol Must remember that. By the way there is always details behind data. Facts again are: He is showing the highest favorability among all prominent political figures.

So not the highest unfavorable rating then fact, and also a fact, the highest favorability.

They were rushing to get back to the Embassy and get some real drugs.......lol This from AP: 2018 Argentinian police seize nearly 400 kilos of cocaine from the Russian embassy in Buenos Aires

Your opinion is worthless, your whole post is dripping in antisemitism and hate by the very fact that you always and deliberately misspell Israel and Netanyahu to disrespect and minimize their very being.

So why did AP say members as with all other media and official records?

Of course you prefer to believe Hamas, that goes without saying

Yea you got it, its all on Al Jazeera for you

Hezbollah are terrorists and Iran certainly has started wars and is officially a State Sponser of Terrorism, all you do is defend it. Stop spreading misinformation. Link already provided.

Has he the highest favourability rating as claimed? Lame attempt to take away the facts.

Your not representative though. Nigel Farage holds highest favorability rating in Ipsos poll https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/nigel-farage-holds-highest-favourability-rating-ipsos-poll-almost-half-hold-unfavourable-opinion