Jump to content

hotchilli

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    53,107
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by hotchilli

  1. 3 hours ago, bradiston said:

    Very sore point. The education system is inextricably intertwined with indoctrination. So any criticism thereof, and you're on thin ice. The argument can only end with one conclusion, and in my experience, it's not one many Thais find easy to swallow. Sooner or later.though, they will have to admit it, and embrace the paradigm shift needed to change the whole system. But we've all seen what happens to people trying to bring about that change. Some get bail. Many don't. That's the reality. For Srettha and other members of the hiso establishment it's a total disgrace that they can pretend not to see why it's happening, and sacrifice generations of young people's futures for the sake of one ageing one.

    Well said...

  2. 19 minutes ago, Srikcir said:

    That is the power of the electorate under a constitutional monarchy - to establish and regulate the authority of a monarchy by the majority of the electorate. As such, all citizens of the State are not above the law.

    See the Magna Carta of 1215.

    • "It (the Magna Carta) sought to prevent the king from exploiting his power, and placed limits of royal authority by establishing law as a power in itself." https://www.parliament.uk

    Just the opposite would be an absolute monarchy wherein the citizens are bound by the sole power of a monarchy which is above the laws.

    Note that Section 3 of the Thai constitution states that  "Sovereign powers belong to the Thai people."

    And how is that power exercised? "...through the National Assembly (aka National Legislative Assembly consisting of the House and Senate), the Council of Ministers and the Courts..."  https://www3.ago.go.th

    MFP is following the law under the Constitution with its anticipated amendment(s). 

    100% correct.... but the law in Thailand is very flexible when need be, and we seem to have an absolute monarchy.

    Sovereign rights of the people are often ignored, as is the constitution.

    • Agree 1
  3. 7 minutes ago, wensiensheng said:

    You sure this is the only “dumb mistake” he’s made?
     

    Personally, I doubt it. He may well know people who can unlock phones and has provided a steady supply of them in the past. Just as likely a scenario as it being a one off.

     

    weird thing is, if he had just given the phone back immediately , there would have been no disturbance and he would have faced no charges whatsoever! No such thing as attempted theft in Thailand presumably.

    The post failed to say if the lady wanted to make a report or press charges against him, without that the police will do very little.

    • Agree 1
  4. 13 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

    After providing these details to the police, she was asked to forgive the suspect and drop the case, as they believed he would reoffend even after serving jail time.

    Ask the officer who said drop the case if they would do the same if it was their wife, daughter or family member?

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...