dinsdale

Well worth a look no matter what side of the fence you sit on. ABC Australia is the national broadcaster which is meant to be neutral as it is tax payer funded but in reality is well left of centre.

Seems like folks are coming out to vote.

although a trend for the highest dose is apparent. "I did not waste my time further by reading the second one (from Bangkadesh)." Well there you go. Shows how you come to conclusions. Had you done so you would have seen this... "Although the study sample was too small (n = 72) to draw any solid conclusions, the results provide evidence of the potential benefit of early intervention with the drug ivermectin for the treatment of adult patients diagnosed with mild COVID-19. First, early intervention promoted faster viral clearance during disease onset, which might have prevented significant immune system involvement and hastened the recovery. Secondly, early intervention reduced the viral load faster, thus may help block disease transmission in the general population. A larger randomized controlled clinical trial of ivermectin treatment appears to be warranted to validate these important findings." Of course big pharma came in cited studies that used Ivermectin too late into the infection where it's ineffective and the rest is history. Even mentioning Ivermectin got people demonized, demonetized (YT) and censored on social media platforms. No money in Ivermectin. No billions of dollars to be made.

More than 6,000 law enforcement agencies were missing from the FBI’s national crime data last year, representing nearly one-third of the nation’s 18,000 police agencies. This means a quarter of the U.S. population wasn't represented in the federal crime data last year, according to The Marshall Project’s analysis. Many of the largest police departments, like the NYPD and LAPD, are still missing. https://www.themarshallproject.org/2023/07/13/fbi-crime-rates-data-gap-nibrs ....data informing the FBI’s figures is supplied voluntarily by law enforcement agencies across the US, and do not include major metropolitan areas including Los Angeles and New York, where crime is historically high. The LAPD and NYPD are the two largest police forces in the nation, but they are not included in the FBI data, which could have changed the data if it had been included. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/crime/fbi-crime-statistics-2024-b2561552.html

High-dose ivermectin for early treatment of COVID-19 (COVER study): a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase II, dose-finding, proof-of-concept clinical trial https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8734085/ A five-day course of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19 may reduce the duration of illness https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(20)32506-6/fulltext

You could very easily replace Donald Trump's with Pfizer's or Moderna's IMO.

It needed to be administered early on in the infection. The studies that showed a lack of efficacy of the drug was because it given too late into the viral progression.

Indeed but sadly there are many who lack the ability to question what they are told. If the vaccine saved millions then the vaccine saved millions. No need to question our masters. 1984: Eric Arthur Blair aka George Orwell The Party controls every source of information, managing and rewriting the content of all newspapers and histories for its own ends. The party now being the WHO, big pharma, the CDC and governments and the newspapers being the legacy media.

This is something that keeps being pushed and I can't quite work out. The vaccines saved millions. How do they know? How do they know it was the vaccine? Where does the number come from? What about those who died and were vaccinated? Didn't save them. Even the numbers that died can be disputed. Died with or died from.

Yes. Children should be vaccinated against measles/mumps/rubella. If you are vaccinated you won't get measles/mumps/rubella. If you are vaccinated against covid you can still get covid. The former is old vaccination method the latter new mRNA vaccination method. As a guess I reckon serious adverse reactions to one will be much, much, much less than the other.

Which particular conspiracy theories would they be then? Can you please elucidate so I know what I'm being a conspiracy theorist about. I was deemed a conspiracy theorist about mRNA vaccines can be harmful. This of course is no longer a conspiracy theory but fact so it can't be that. What else do you have in mind? It was a lab leak and not a zoonotic jump that spread from a wet market. Well the overwhelming opinion and evidence sure points to this being the case so let's rule that one out. Maybe you can tell me some others that I'm being a conspiracy theorist about. Freedom of speech not being allowed? Well we've all seen this in action over the last four years so nup can't be that? Anything else you can think of?

At least you acknowledge it isn't just a veterinarian drug. There was a time that if you said anything other than it being a "horse drug" the post would be removed.

Try opening a discussion on Ivermectin.

Do you not understand that big pharma gives huge amounts of money to research centres and universities? Any negative research findings jeopardised that research funding. Doctors were threatened to toe the line, and any dissenting views were censored and or called conspiracy theories. The talking heads on tv/legacy media were pushing the UN/big pharma/CDC line and nothing else. More stuff is coming out now but is still buried or dismissed. Remember saying that the vaccines weren't effective in stopping transmission or even catching covid and may even be harmful was immediately labeled conspiracy theory. It turned out that it was true.

Yes it's a lvl 4 biosecurity lab but as I remember research was taking place in a lvl 2 section. I might be wrong.

Mark Zuckerberg would disagree with you that the Dems support freedom of speech. Everyone on this forum knows that freedom of speech has been quashed under the neo liberal left of the Democratic party.

Suggesting to investigate if it's plausible using science. Big difference to shooting yourself up with bleach wouldn't you say? Who knows. Maybe for example a 0.00000000000000001% bleach in some sort of solution may have had some benefit. I doubt it very much but they were early days and people were searching for solutions. Interesting though that he mentioned sunlight because as it turned out vitamin B was beneficial. He wouldn't have known that of course.

See my above post to put this in context. This is pretty much just a sound bite. "It would be interesting to check that. You would need to have medical doctors...." He is clearly not telling people to inject bleach.

Billions of dollars made in what IMHO is the greatest crime against humanity and no one will be held accountable.

Sorry. Misread your post. My 'gut instinct" was quite simply that DNA was being put into experimental 'vaccines' and rushed onto the market whilst other possible effective treatments were being taken off. Fortunately I am not one of the brainless sheep and have critical thinking skills. I did have 2 AZ jabs though but I'll NEVER have mRNA jabs.

...at level 2 biosecurity.

Ah!!!! Just what governments want. People with zero critical thinking skills that will believe 100% what they are told through their media mouthpieces.

Fantastic source you've quoted. Generals backing Kamala is a self preservation move after the completely botched deal with the Taliban and poorly executed withdrawal from Afghanistan. Fairly sure they don't want Trump as their new boss. Fairly sure this Admiral won't be voting for Trump.

Monday was not a booze prohibition day and neither was his birthday.