BangkokReady

8 hours ago, James105 said:

8 hours ago, Hamus Yaigh said:

Using the violence angle a typical deflection tactic for bigots to get their viewpoint across. Agree his music was shyte however.

 

What has JK Rowling ever said that is bigoted?  Do you have an example? 

She's literally just said, "No male bodies in female spaces".  That's it.  She's completely woke in everything apart from this one point, and that made her a Nazi social outcast for the loony left.

It's utter madness.

8 hours ago, Gottfrid said:

It´s almost a daily event that foreigners in Thailand behave aggressive, weird or just being an arse. 

Speak for yourself!

6 hours ago, Alpha84 said:

It's gotta be all the negative whingers, whiners and moaners on AN. 

I can't believe you let something so trivial bother you so much.  You must have such a negative point of view. 

And then you come and whinge about it here!

6 hours ago, frank83628 said:

houses in the area all beoing bought up by foreigners

You sure it's not locals buying the homes?

3 hours ago, novanova said:

old white males

An oddly racist comment.

Why does it matter that they are also old and White?  Is young Black males doing it OK to you?

9 minutes ago, stevenl said:

The guy is an evangelical nutter. Therefore republican.

Sounds more like a Dem pushed over the edge.

2 minutes ago, blaze master said:

Something doesn't smell right with this whole situation.

He was Dem affiliated. Apparently one victim is considered to have voted out of line with the party. There were "no kings" flyers found in his car. Plus there is already an established pattern of left-wing violence.

It seems pretty unlikely that the guy is right-wing.

1 hour ago, jerrymahoney said:

Senator Tina Smith of Minnesota, a Democrat, said in an interview that the gunman’s target list included her name and the names of other lawmakers, all of whom are Democrats.

Could be going after perceived "traitor Dems" who voted in a way he disagreed with.

27 minutes ago, jas007 said:

They can't simply be thrown in prison without a trial.  How do you prove who is a member? They spread a lot of nonsense, to be sure, and some gullible people likely believe it and act accordingly.  In other words, it would be a circus.  

Sure. They need due process. Simply round them up at the protests (all the people dressed on black carrying shields), then investigate and put on trial if links to the domestic terrorist organisation called antifa can be proven.

3 minutes ago, MalcolmB said:

I am hopeful that Trump will bring out the worst in you all and that will result in some self reflection when you finally wake up and see he is destroying your country further while enriching himself.

Trump's political/ideological enemies doing bad things is not evidence of Trump being bad. 

Not sure why that seems so hard for some to understand.  Most likely they/you are simply being dishonest.

1 hour ago, cjinchiangrai said:

Not confirmed because it is not true. He is a right wing nut job.

Seems like he might be left-wing actually.

On 6/4/2025 at 8:44 PM, impulse said:

If ever there was a legitimate case to pixelate a face, this is it. 

 

Why out her?

This is the part that she would obviously appreciate being publicised, the truth.

On 6/13/2025 at 8:13 AM, watchcat said:

Why do people read that crap (Tic Tok)?

The same reason people watch garbage TV shows.

7 minutes ago, josephbloggs said:

Where do you come up with this rubbish?

These are the facts. If you don't like those facts, there isn't much you can do.

2 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

But which political party has been grandstanding these issues?

Well, the left said "We want to trans your kids, we want male bodies in the private spaces of women and girls, and we want unlimited ideological access to your children", all under the guise of helping children.

The right then said, "No".

I think most would agree that the right has had a fairly mild response, given what the left wants.

So, no. Youre wrong.

2 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The rightwing fixation with perverts and accusing others of being a risk to children is a central plank of current rightwing messaging.

Not central, and certainly less than the left. So you're wrong again.

2 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Again, is there, for example, a link between being an abuser and projecting that abuse on others?

Are you suggesting that the loony left's obsession with targeting children is hiding a desire to abuse those children?

1 hour ago, EVENKEEL said:

I've come to expect more from you. This all you got?

He knows he's messed up and he's finding it hard to backtrack.

He knows the left are generally the "moral crusaders", and that there are more perverts on the left than on the right.

I wonder if he regrets starting this thread, as it's made him look even more stupid and dishonest than usual.

46 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The subject is perverts in the party of moral crusaders.

What an odd choice of lies to tell.

Clearly the left are far more often styled as the "good guys" and the "moral crusaders".

The centre/right of centre are a lot more matter of fact.

Do you think that people will just beleive whatever nonsense you spew onto your keyboard?

1 hour ago, josephbloggs said:

Finally it dawns on you.

What dawns on me? What on Earth are you talking about?

1 hour ago, josephbloggs said:

So that means we can now criticise Trump without being called a Biden-loving, men-in-women's-showers promoting, illegal immigrant supporting terrorism fan?

Who said you can't criticise Trump? Criticise whomever you want, as much as you want.

1 hour ago, josephbloggs said:

Welcome to the real world, I am glad you finally arrived.

What bizarre nonsensical comment. You sound unhinged.

9 minutes ago, bendejo said:

One of the Conservative cudgels they love to to wield is how they very much want to protect children.  Well, any decent person would want to defend a child under threat, it goes without saying.

Aren't a lot of Dems in favour of males in female spaces and encouraging kids to transition?  And that's as policy, not a random person.

9 minutes ago, bendejo said:

But who will protect the children from those among them, like this sicko?

The same people who would protect children from the "sickos" in the Dem ranks?

Parents?  Those who have responsibility for their safety and care?  The police?

You talk like one person doing something means that anyone who happens to follow the same political ideology is in favour of that thing.  That's just silly.