Jump to content

BangkokReady

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    7,041
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by BangkokReady

  1. 4 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

    Police officers at Bang Kruai Police Station conducted an additional interrogation of Anan at 10.30am today. Despite having been questioned the previous night, Anan remained visibly shaken and provided inconsistent statements.

     

    She claimed she witnessed her daughter Kanyakorn and son in law arguing on the sofa in their home. Fearing that Warakorn might use a nearby knife to harm her daughter, she grabbed the knife, leading to a chaotic struggle and ultimately stabbing him multiple times.

     

    The wife stabbed him during an argument and now the mother-in-law is trying to take the blame, claiming that it was a struggle rather than a deliberate killing to reduce the punishment?

    • Confused 1
    • Agree 1
  2. 3 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

    This innovative rule makes school exciting for me."

     

    Hardly innovative.  🙄

     

    3 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

    Principal Wichien Thongklee stated that Boon Wattana is the first school in the area to recognize and respect students' right to showcase their gender identity through their looks.

     

    Do they have such a right?  They're at school.  Perhaps he meant to give them a right to do this in this particular school.

     

    3 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

    Thongklee noted, "This initiative has been warmly embraced by students and their parents. All the LGBTQ students I encountered today appeared truly joyful. This aligns perfectly with our policy favoring a positive and fun learning environment."

     

    Of course the students are happy with fewer rules.  Most of them would be happy with less learning and more break times.

     

    Pleasing students should never be the priority.  It should be about how things affect their performance and their learning environment.

  3. 3 hours ago, Nick Carter icp said:

    Its just some people using the word incorrectly

     

    I suspect it's simply that they dislike the idea of men having sex with girls who are under 18 so much that they want men who do it to be thought of as being the same as men who rape prepubescent children.  Obviously, if adult men have sex with girls under 18, they may face legal consequences, but that doesn't mean they deserve to be lumped in with actual child-rapists.

  4. 4 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

    Thai Man Turns Himself In After Kidnapping and Assaulting His 7-Year-Old Son

     

    A man from Thailand turned himself in at a police station after allegedly attacking and abducting his seven-year-old son.

     

    I'm not sure you can kidnap or abduct your own son.  It didn't say that the mother had custody.

     

    4 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

    Naweesak faces charges related to violence, threats and coercion, which can result in a three-year jail sentence, a fine of 60,000 baht, or both.

     

    No kidnapping or abduction there.

    • Confused 1
  5. 12 minutes ago, JensenZ said:

    Get a grip! If you don't believe something, prove it wrong - how simple is that? Instead, you want to blab on about it in 50 posts, begging for me to prove I'm right.

     

    I'll give you a clue. Look up the laws on Sex Tourism in your home country. You must be planning on under 18 dating, so it is best you familiarize yourself with the laws in your country. You might be ok, you might not be - I don't care.

     

    It just doesn't work like that.

     

    "Here's my claim and it's up to you to prove me wrong if you disagree." 

     

    No.  The onus is on you to support the claim that you made.

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
  6. Just now, JensenZ said:

    I can back up claims, but I don't want to as I find your demands irritating. There is no obligation for members here to provide references, or proof.

     

    But there is.  It's in the rules, plus it's considered the done thing when making a factual claim.

     

    Overwise, people assume you're making things up.  Which it seems that you are...  🤷‍♂️

    • Like 1
    • Agree 1
  7. 1 minute ago, JensenZ said:

    I'm pretty sure it's correct and it's easy to verify, which I am not going to do for you.

     

    You're "pretty sure" but you cannot confirm?  It sounds like you're not sure at all.  If you were sure, you would be happy to provide the source that supports your claim.

     

    It's up to you if you cannot be bothered to substantiate your claim, but it makes it very unreliable.

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
  8. 3 minutes ago, JensenZ said:

    It's not nearly as simple as you describe here. The age difference of the participants comes into it too, and for countries such as the US and Australia, it's illegal for anyone to have sexual relations with anyone under the age of 18 in ANOTHER country.

     

    Are you sure it's that, not if they travel for that specific purpose?  Do you have a source?

  9. 5 hours ago, webfact said:

    Phichate's girlfriend denied having an affair, stating their relationship was purely platonic. Despite this, Phichate now faces charges of intentional murder, with potential penalties ranging from 15 years of imprisonment to the death penalty.

     

    Even though the girl claims that she didn't cheat, he still faces a murder charge?  Was there ever any chance that that would have any effect on what he was charged with?

×
×
  • Create New...