Parsve

Maybe it would be best to find out Thailands entry requirements and other countries exit requirements and how they affect tourists before you start a campaign, but hey, this is Thailand, no brains just wild ideas popping up and implemented, at least for a week or so.

Dream on, and when you eventually wake up, think of what you offer the "trillionaires" to became a part of Thailand, an underdeveloped country. Today it is nothing more than to be cheated. Few will fall into that trap. 

Wait, they mention China. As far as I know China have blocked all tourist from leaving the country.

3 hours ago, Tropicalevo said:

Pigs have no wings and hens no teeth.

And Prayut no brain.

There are 246 countries in the world. 222 of them have a smaller number of Covid infected than Thailand. So why only entry from 45 countries?

So every one, even, thais have to spend one night in a hotel even if they have a home in the place of arrival. Money, money, money ... 

5 hours ago, webfact said:

They will need to take an RT-PCR test upon arrival in Thailand and must spend the first night at an Alternative State Quarantine (ASQ) facility or an authorized hotel to wait for the test result.

And the cost for that will for the tourist be ??????

Welcome to the new Amazing Thailand where you can do nothing except visit temples. Alcohol? Yes of course, you put it on your hands and sucks it up with your skin.

Have Prayuth as PM ever said something that not is confusing? 

I maybe have misunderstand all about this, but is it not this way? A nut in, the boss of the Thai health ministry have decide that "ordinary" thai people should be vaccinated with one of two Chinese vaccin, either Sinovax or Sinopharm. He have more than ordered it. He have said that those thais that refuse to take it are not allowed to visit public areas. But UK has never accept those vaccines for visit the country, so most of the thai people is still on the red list.    

Dear sir, if you are right about this, and I am pretty sure that you are, can you then answer me on those two questions.

1. If vaccination is the right answer, why then do you block ordinarie thai people to get vaccinated with vaccine that works instead of that Chines sh*t that the health ministry have admit is not good enough? And no, that you not have enough is not an acceptable answer because that situation came up because of the health ministry.

2. You say that 143. death a day is manageable. For who? It is the health ministry who by its inkompetens have build up this number.

Before Songkran this year Thailand was on place 147 in the list of the countries that had most covid-infected. Today Thailand is on place 26. All because of mistakes and inkompetens from the government and its ministries. So, yes I think that you are  right, but I demand that you take responsibility for your earlier mistakes.

I agree. I use to say that thai food is like 50:s farmer food but ruined with spices so you not could feel the taste of anything else. And to that always rice. I live in the middle of the rice belt and here they have rice even in the ice cream. 

Let TAT collect the money and we will see a big change, " yes MR PM I assure you there was not more than 50 tourists in the first Q".

The never ending story

Sarcasm, just like all jokes, is bad done if people not understand what it is. Therefore not blame others.

Note, no sarcasm in this answer.

1 hour ago, Saraburi121 said:

What hospital did she get the jab?

She has not get it yet, but will have it (Sinopharm is the only she cold get) the 5th in next month at a private hospital in Phichit (up in the central of Thailand). 

My thai wife have to pay 2000 baht per shot of Sinopharm. It  is the only vaccine she could get and the province say, without to be vaccinated you are not allowed to go in to bank, amphoe etc. I have get Pfizer for free and will get my second jab before she get hers first. Very strange indeed. By the way is it not the king of Thailand who ones the company that sell Sinopharm?

Just a little more polished way to tell that you are a racist.

What he is trying to say is, "Do not ask me, I live in my own bubble".

So it is more about to get money in than to save lives then.

"Also: There is software available, that projects a current picture of a person up to the age of 65. Looking at the result, one might be more hesitant to swear "until death do us part".

Who on earth is so dumb that they believe in those software. How should a software, that only have a photo of you be able to decide when your face begin to get crumpled, when you get bald, when your hair get grey or you need to start wearing glasses. You maybe even prefer to where lenses. Take down this foolish question