Yellowtail

I think 36 months to get them all deported starting with the ones with the least seniority first. They can apply for a work visa in their home county three months after they're deported. Of course, anyone not working can be deported right away yes?

Were you not misleading when you implied my use of "poor in the US" meant poor US citizens? They generally get the same free school, medical and food programs everyone else gets. Here was the post:

I have to say, the petrol rentals I have driven in the US with idle-stop have been fine, with the diesel Fortuner it's sh*t.

So as soon as the law passed they would all leave?

Free schools, medical, housing assistance and any number of other benefits make it pretty attractive.

Okay, I'm with you.

Okay, we agree that the E-Verify should be mandated for all employees regardless of years of service, and any employee in the country illegally should be terminated. Deported as well?

Well, I don't know. You have a construction company that has thirty crews working with about 60 full time employees and 900 1099s, two of the 1099s on one crew hired by one foreman are illegals, does the foreman go to jail? The supervisor? The owner? The HR manager? All of them? And for how long?

Yes, that 48 current and former Trump workers were interviewed by The Washington Post is likely a fact.

It could mean all new hires.

Okay, how long does the homeowner go to jail for hiring guys to help paint their house? How long does someone operating a packing house go to jail for, and is it just the operator, or the HR and owners as well?

The facts that how he was intentionally hiring illegals and paying them less or treating them worse than his other employees. Again, as far as I know, he was trying to stop the flood of illegals flooding across the border and wanted to deport illegal aliens involved in criminal activity, are you against that?

Yes, the author's opinion was clearly laid out. The facts not so much.

A 26% average increase year on year would mean your 8,000 investment would be worth 256,240 not 30,000

This is what I said: Okay, I think the penalty would vary greatly depending on the situation. If Joe Bagadonuts gets a couple guys from in front of Home Depot to help paint his house, I think a fine is in order. If someone owns a string of massager parlors and is working with traffickers to smuggle underage girls in to work as prostitutes, I think they should be executed. If someone operates a packing house, and knowingly is hires illegal aliens, has been fined for it once or twice and continues to disregard the law, I think they should be convicted and incarcerated. What is it you think is too lenient about this?

Or, as you claim to know what it says you could just tell me in a sentence of two. I looked at what you linked to. It did not seem clearly laid out to me.

I generally agree, but how do you decide who goes to jail? Mandated, for all employees, correct? Free schools, medical housing assistance and any number of other benefits make it pretty attractive. Beig poor in the US is way better than being poor in most places. Really? I'm 65 years old and my mistrust of the government is fairly new. In any event, the government already has a database that included all the people working legally in the US so that's a bit silly.

Sorry, I thought you asked me again. I don't know enough about his hiring practices to call him a hypocrite. Was he intentionally hiring illegals and paying them less or treating them worse than his other employees? As far as I know, he was trying to stop the flood of illegals flooding across the border and wanted to deport illegal aliens involved in criminal activity, are you against that?

Sorry, they pleaded guilty and negotiated a fine, yes?

Yeah, I wasn't talking to you.

You are pretending to not understand what penalize means, and it's me being evasive? Okay, I think the penalty would vary greatly depending on the situation. If Joe Bagadonuts gets a couple guys from in front of Home Depot to help paint his house, I think a fine is in order. If someone owns a string of massager parlors and is working with traffickers to smuggle underage girls in to work as prostitutes, I think they should be executed. If someone operates a packing house, and knowingly is hires illegal aliens, has been fined for it once or twice and continues to disregard the law, I think they should be convicted and incarcerated. But in all three of the above, the offenders are penalized. So again, 1. Do you support penalizing all employers that knowingly hire illegal aliens? 2. Do you support mandating every employee be E-Verified regardless of position or years of service?

They pleaded guilty and negotiated a fine, just like Hillary, yes?

In what way? It is only dubious to the left. Do you think the officers at the border do nothing? As I remember they check documents and vehicles and whatnot. More officers would allow more of this could be done. Is what about illegal drugs? I thought were talking about illegal aliens. But yes, given they occasionally catch people at the boarder with drugs, more searches should result in more people being caught. No. How about we handle it like you suggest we handle illegal immigration? Rather than wasting time trying to stop drugs from coming into the country, we focus on punishing the users to reduce the demand?

Actually, it is two easy yes or no questions: 1. Do you support penalizing all employers that knowingly hire illegal aliens? 2. Do you support mandating every employee be E-Verified regardless of position or years of service?

Is that all you have, really? From the link: "Five individuals have already pleaded guilty in connection with the scheme..."