Jump to content

Eloquent pilgrim

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    3,206
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Location
    Cha-am

Recent Profile Visitors

3,064 profile views

Eloquent pilgrim's Achievements

Gold Member

Gold Member (8/14)

  • Conversation Starter
  • Very Popular Rare
  • 5 Reactions Given
  • First Post
  • Posting Machine Rare

Recent Badges

7.4k

Reputation

  1. Once again you demonstrate that the only tools in your armoury, and consequently your only contributions, are contradiction, personal insults, and cognitive incoherence. You behave like a kid in a ‘yes it is, no it isn’t’ playground exchange, continually under the misconception that as long as you are the last to speak, you have somehow won the exchange; this belief drives you to continually embarrass yourself, so keep it coming, it’s great entertainment.
  2. You now seem to be using incoherence as a debating tactic; a truly fascinating ploy ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
  3. Time for you to put the shovel down and stop embarrassing yourself. Didn’t even know the name of the Prime Minister of the UK …. ha ha ha haha ha
  4. You don't even know his name .... absolutely hilarious, most embarrassing comment on here so far this year.
  5. Extending the agreement by another 12 years with nothing tangible in return, is a disgraceful betrayal of the UK’s fishermen, but unfortunately, it is not the first, as we belatedly discovered in 2000 under the 30 year rule. With the release of Government papers under this rule, we now know that Geoffrey Rippon, fisheries minister at the time, told the treacherous Ted Heath, Tory Prime Minister at the time, "If we want to enter the EEC (as it was then known) under the terms stated by General De Gaulle, we will have to sacrifice Britain’s fishermen, which is exactly what he did. The Common Fisheries policy was hastily introduced by the original 6 members at the instigation of France, at the time that Britain was negotiating membership. It was a simple ploy by the members states to give all members equal fishing rights to UK territorial waters, reducing the protection zone of our fishermen’s rights to 12 miles from the coastline from its previous 200. It also introduced an absurd quota system that has not only seen millions upon millions of fish thrown back into the sea for gulls to feed on, but has resulted in our fishing industry, that was the largest in all of Europe, being completely decimated, leaving huge unemployment and poverty in towns like Hull and Grimsby, the latter once being the largest fishing port in the world. This is yet another sad betrayal of the UK’s fishermen, and the irony of the UK being an island nation, surrounded by bountiful supplies of fish should not be lost on anyone.
  6. Probably best to heed the advice that Sheryl has given, and more or less ignore anything else. You might find an MRI scan uncomfortable; lying motionless for an hour is not the doddle it sounds, if you are already in discomfort, but is probably a must do starting point for you.
  7. Satire is always appreciated; many thanks
  8. Oh no, not another post for the bedwetting lefties and the crybaby democrats, who it transpires only like democracy when it produces a result they like …. give it a rest.
  9. Excellent; what she did was wilful, arrogant, and wrong, and against the interests of law abiding US citizens; and although I doubt if she will be convicted, she will think very carefully before any such future action
  10. The problem for you, is that you lost any credibility on this forum when you spitefully and completely incorrectly accused another poster of being a blind racist; you throw the racist card around like it was a Supermarket card that accrues in value the more often it is used. Despite being asked, you have not found the good grace to apologise for that nasty and completely undeserving slur, yet you call other people’s comments cowardly, whilst continually moralising to everyone. Your comments no longer have any value because nobody now knows if anything you say is genuine or fraudulent, like your slur to @ThreeCardMonte
  11. And yet what you perceive as a problem, is entirely of your own making; because when you falsely accuse someone of being a ‘blind racist’ you devalue the term racist; it becomes meaningless when you throw it around like confetti and use it fraudulently as you have on this very topic. And you still have not summoned the good grace to apologise for that entirely false accusation, yet are prepared to call others cowardly.
  12. Disingenuous deflective nonsense; the issue here is that you unfairly called another poster a “blind racist” in reply to a comment he made that was not in any way, shape, or form racist. You should apologise to him, and learn to control your emotions.
×
×
  • Create New...