Eloquent pilgrim

Expansive anti-America rant, but meaningless; because you have simply bought into the disinformation of the poster you replied to; it has already been mentioned on this thread that this action has nothing to do with winning any asymmetric, war. The purpose of this action is to degrade the capabilities of the Houthi terrorists as much as possible with minimum risk to the the lives of US servicemen. This is to stop, or limit their continuing attacks on International shipping, if you had been following events you would understand that.

Looks like they may have missed the genitalia with the procedure ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Great, and when are they going to move him to Amerika ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

That’s easy, just tell Hamas to release the remaining, completely innocent hostages, that they have been holding (with help from UNRWA) for more than 500 days; or is that too complicated for your particular armchair ?

Trump: We’re transferring 200 Venezuelan gangsters to El Salvador Judge: You cannot do that. Trump: They’re on the plane; next

Where are the forums usual left-wing suspects squealing about their human rights ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Lily Munster

An easy conclusion to arrive at as far as you are concerned; although you are careful enough not to directly support muslim terrorist groups like Hamas, the Houthis and Hezbollah, you invariably criticise any action taken against them. This is particularly true if action against them is by Israel, or even the US. And it is not an attempt to end the war between the Houthis and the Yemeni forces, it is aimed at degrading the capabilities of the Houthis, to prevent them from continually attacking innocent civilian shipping. Your continued criticism of any action against Islamic terrorism is palpable, and your position transparent.

Oh, so you would prefer to see a terrorist organisation left completely unhindered to continue its terrorist activities of attacking innocent civilian ships, and aiming rockets at innocent Israeli citizens… quelle surprise

Said without any sense of irony

To fully understand the authoritarianism of the EU, it is worth studying some history, especially from a British perspective. In January 2001 when, under the 30 year rule, the Public Record Office at Kew opened the files relating to Edward Heath’s application to join the Common Market in 1970, the most striking of these documents were those reflecting the Heath Government’s reaction to something called ‘the Werner Report’. In 1969, the Council of Ministers had commissioned the Prime Minister of Luxembourg, Pierre Werner, to draw up a plan to move the Common Market forward to full economic and monetary union. As luck would have it, his confidential report began circulating in Brussels in October 1970, just as Britain’s negotiations to enter the European Economic Community were getting under way. In the British Foreign Office, as we now know, the Werner Report rang fearful alarm bells. A secret briefing note to Mr. Heath from Con O’Neill, the senior civil servant responsible for Europe, explained that, if implemented, Werner’s proposals would have enormous political repercussions. They envisaged “a process of fundamental political importance, implying progressive development towards a political union” The long-term objectives of economic and monetary union, it was made clear to Mr Heath, “are very far-reaching indeed”, going “well beyond the full establishment of a Common Market”. The Werner plan could lead to,“the ultimate creation of a European federal state, with a single currency. Unfortunately, the treacherous Ted Heath and the Foreign Office, were not alarmed by the contents of the Werner report, but only concerned with keeping its contents from the British public, who were told that we were just joining a “Common Market” …. the rest is well documented and led eventually to the referendum of 2016.

Really ? remind me please of the nationality of every single member of the terrorist organisation Hamas; and remind me of the nationality of every resident in Gaza that voted for Hamas to be their recognised government in 2007, and have supported them ever since. And when you’ve done that, please remind me of the nationality of every person, both Hamas and civilian, that took part in the most barbaric atrocity in modern history on 7th October 2023; and then remind me of the nationality of every civilian that lined the streets of Gaza, jeering, hitting and spitting on the wounded and dead bodies of innocent Israeli citizens that were paraded through Gaza on 7th Oct 23. And finally, please remind me of the nationality of the members of the UN relief agency UNRWA, that have been hiding hostages in their facilities in Gaza, and some of who’s members took part in 7th Oct massacres. Take your time, I know these will be difficult questions for you.

So what exactly is happening in this video then ?

Denying any student the right to safely attend a class at a University, is illegal in the US; even if you didn’t know the law, I would have thought that simple logic would have helped you.

Alarming that you think this applies even when the group being supported is a designated terrorist organisation; not however surprising, because despite being an American, you appear to be anti-American, in fact, anti-Western civilisation, and vehemently pro-Islam. You seem happy to continually prioritise defending the rights of terrorist supporters, against the interests, security, and welfare of ordinary American citizens; that such an excellent education system can produce somebody with your ideologies should be a warning to us all.