coolcarer

It was a vile post. But since you indorse it then it can only be assumed you agree.

Disagree. Everytime Hamas has fires a rocket into Israel it is a war crime. There have been tens of thousands of rockets. Even Palestinian officials acknowledged Hamas’ rockets were war crimes. “Each and every missile against Israel constitutes a crime against humanity whether it hits or misses, because it is directed at civilian targets.” https://www.standwithus.com/factsheets-hamas-war-crimes

When was Hamas formed? Do you have a list of all the war crimes they have committed?

So that’s Biden, Harris, Blinken, Miller and of course Israel all saying it’s n Hamases hands now. US State Department spokesman Matthew Miller says Washington supports Israel’s demand that Hamas present a list of the living hostages it is prepared to release in order to move forward with the negotiations. https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog_entry/us-israeli-demand-that-hamas-present-list-of-alive-hostages-a-legitimate-one/

Absolutely not. There are no reasonable demands when holding innocent hostages let alone the ones being made by Hamas currently. Tell me what are all those demands that are reasonable. You obviously know right? You talk about Israel war crimes with no evidence yet ignore Hamas holding hostages as a war crime with evidence. Then go on to state Israel needs to create a two state solution. Again what about Hamas? what an apologist post. Bookmarked

More proof you need to reAd more and not be spoon fed. Sarcasm is the lowest form of wit. No surprise there from you. Enjoy pressing that ignore button so you can avoid the actual information in the OP

No not nice but like I said you need to read it. Sharon, who did not want to give her surname, said she was approached by a man who began aggressively questioning her religion and the conflict in Israel, while she was putting up hostage posters in east London. When she began filming the incident for her safety, the man pushed her to the ground and snatched her phone before smashing it on the pavement. The man then tried to punch her as she tried to get her phone back, she added.

No it’s not. You need to read more of this topic and cease the victim blaming “I was talking to my friend and then next to me I hear someone say ‘pigs’. The guy next to me was on FaceTime and says, ‘I’m on the train with a bunch of dirty Jewish pigs, scumbags and baby killers’.

It was a fine example of victim blaming, one of the finest I’ve read a lame attempt to call my post flaming.

More victim blaming and lack of reading

Then you have obviously not read the topic or other post links. You need to do that first because I am not doing it for you.

So all you have proved is that’s it’s impossible to hold an honest discussion with you when you keep making things up, with that I will leave it with what I actually said and let you carry on yourself

I didn’t say that though, how can you agree with something I never said. Would you like me to repeat what I said?

What’s that got to do with. Jew walking down the street and getting targeted? Do they have to deny what they are or what they believe no matter what it is?

I never made such a bizarre opinion though. Oh and while you are being the pacifist. Hamas ignored it and promised to carry out Oct 7 again and again. Your solution. Take it to ICJ.

Your opinion was take it to the ICJ. It’s been there already. They ignored it. Clearly your opinion is ridiculous

You said So stop the weak deflection of your victim blaming

The most ridiculous response to a terrorist massacre and hostage taking. Terrorists do not listen to the ICJ or I CC. The ICJ has already ordered them to release all hostage………..nothing.

Why do they have to protest against their own country to not be persecuted? Why are they persecuted when they protest Hamas holding their families and loved ones?

Ignoring is a different debate. Nothing to do with my original post clarifying that it’s not possible for any country to veto it.

That’s what the UN asked for from the court. Do some research

I know

My quote is from the link………😏

Oh yes it is …lol Advisory proceedings conclude with the delivery of the advisory opinion at a public sitting. Such opinions are essentially advisory; in other words, unlike the Court's judgments, they are not binding. https://www.icj-cij.org/how-the-court-works

No country can veto the decision of the court…….lol The court is only issuing an advisory opinion, simple1