Chomper Higgot

You hide your disgust that Labour are helping the homeless behind your customary immigrant fixation.

Right there in the OP, the Government not just decriminalizing homelessness but increasing funding to deal with it.

Great news for Scotland, the UK and the University of Edinburgh.

Read the OP. Not the ‘clues’ that materialize in your own mind.

Counter factual nonsense. The OP gives some clues as to what triggered this downturn.

Amazing luck. You’d have to believe you were being looked after. Buy a lottery ticket young man!

The ramblings of a disturbed mind.

And yet Labour are deporting more illegal immigrants than the Tories. Arresting more immigrants illegally working than the Tories. And vastly increasing spending on social housing and affordable housing. Grubby buy to let landlords are, perhaps understandably, not happy but just wait until the renters rights bill passes into law. Brace for income whinging, low and to the right.

That is true, and now they will not be criminalized for that choice.

A post that ignores Labour’s massive increase in funding for social and affordable housing while failing to understand decriminalizing homelessness is a positive change regardless of any other matters.

Which is?

Don’t think the increased spending on house construction will or will not create jobs?

No not at all. Support their choice not to avoid a painful death. Freedom to choose to suffer, only in this case they don’t get to become a vector for the disease they choose not to take steps to avoid.

You need to update your grasp of Palestinian refugees in other neighboring nations.

Erm yes, within the bounds of international law. Just like every other nation state.

A huge improvement since the election, no slogans, not performative cruelty, no hundreds of £millions being wasted on failed schemes, just quietly getting the job done: https://news.sky.com/story/arrests-of-illegal-migrant-workers-increase-by-51-in-year-since-labour-elected-13380090

Israel is a sovereign state in which its citizens have the absolute right to exist in peace. Another form of ethnic cleansing is not a solution to the one being proposed by the U.S. Ambassador to Israel.

The U.S. Ambassador to Israel openly proposes ethnic cleansing while offering up this hypocrisy: And:

So you’ve arrived here already. In response to my observation that the term ‘Free Palestine’ says no more than it does (no need to engage in the ludicrous adding of phrases that aren’t included). You now move on the questioning whether I celebrated a heinous terrorist attack. This does nothing other than demonstrate the weakness of your argument. My views on the heinous terrorist attack of October 7 are adequately expressed in multiple topics in which it is the subject of discussion. Utter shameless nonsense.

Did it occur to you that you are not being presented with the less newsworthy peaceful protests?

Ludicrous nonsense.

Did you read the OP? The bill attempts to define the term “Free Palestine” as antisemitic. No mention whatsoever of ‘River to the Sea’. Please instead the OP.

Erm what’s this ‘river to the sea’ nonsense? ’Free Palestine’ is term of two worlds, it does not include ‘River’, ‘to’, ‘the’ or ‘sea’. Please don’t embarrass yourself with any more such nonsense.

It means precisely what it says. Not an unusual statement given Palestine is under foreign military occupation. The term ‘Free [nation under foreign military occupation]’ has been used for decades wherever foreign militaries occupy someone else’s territory.

You’re jumping the gun. There is an attempt in the bill to define language use. Read the OP