Chomper Higgot

‘Faux outrage’. I couldn’t have said it better myself.

You do know there’s a lot of people walking around with drugs on their person? And marijuana, goodness what an absolute outrage…. Not!

Reality isn’t as neat and tidy as you want it to be. It’s certainly not a TV show we’re the evidence always reveals a culprit and the culprit is always caught. So, slip into the alternative world in which conspiracy theories replace reality and comfort the gap between fetid imaginings and fact.

“The Met are doing everything they can to avoid bringing charges given the shared political outlook and somewhat cozy relationship they have with The BBC. ” More unfounded conspiracy nonsense.

And it is now reported that over a month ago Kushner gave testimony to the Grand Jury. Jack be nimble, Jack be quick. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/jared-kushner-testify-trump-grand-jury-b2375027.html

That’s the second investigation in as many days that has closed down before you got the result you hoped for. And the second time you’ve reacted with baseless speculation of a coverup. It’s just another nothing-burger.

Except of course delivering for America. My punt is Joe Biden is waiting to see who the GOP candidate will be. Well that and it must be a slow news day, though buckle up, it’s soon to accelerate.

Oh so there’s bank records. And yet nobody has seen them but the person claiming they exist.

And yet The Sun never provided any evidence and couldn’t bring itself to name names. Stinks of the gutter press tactics the UK red tops are renowned for.

My bad, you did not. I confused you with ANOther poster. Please accept my apologies .

Hasn’t stopped you speculating on Stockholm’s Syndrome.

Nevertheless, The Sun have not produced any evidence of this alleged abuse, the ‘alleged victim’s’ lawyer has stated there is no wrong doing and the Police have stated no crimes. So now the gutter press move on to allegations of inappropriate behaviour’. Your imagined existence of Stockholm syndrome speak of desperation.

Yep, Space Karen flounced.

You clearly over estimate your power of knowing what other people think.

Add the lawyer stating no wrong doing and the Police saying nothing illegal.

I can think of a number of reasons, including not prejudicing a future libel action. Say nothing and let the lawyers deal with it in court.

Why should the man’s wife make any denial of the accusations?

Evil is a bit strong, but perhaps she does have ‘issues’.

Yeh Yeh.

You are once again on your BBC thing, your use of the pejorative term ‘extort’ is the first clue. Why is anyone’s salary relevant to the topic of discussion, or are you stoking envy? Please can you provide evidence of why the public have the right to expect an employer to name an employee who has been baselessly accused by the gutter press if anything, let alone the accusations laid by The Sun. Putting aside the obvious problems with employers naming employees, here’s a clue as to another reason why naming names might be problematic - The Sun, which made the accusations, chose not to name the person they were accusing.

That’s a little ambiguous, I’m not sure if you are arguing against the statement made by the alleged victim’s lawyer or that statements libel action would probably be difficult. Direct naming isn’t a necessity in libel suits. Also, I suspect others who were put under public scrutiny by The Sun’s allegations might also have a claim to file suit. By example members on this forum made unsubstantiated guesses at who The Sun we’re referring too.

Weirder even that the alleged victim’s lawyer has said there is no wrong doing. Maybe the lawyer and the Police are right and The Sun was wrong.

There you go again with your accusations of a police coverup. The BBC is an employer, the BBC mission statement does not change that fact. On what basis would any employer have to name employees baselessly accused of crimes by the gutter press. The Sun is almost certainly in line for a libel suit, I doubt very much the BBC wishes to be named a co-respondent, and if they were you’d be on here ranting about public money being wasted. Your consistent attempts to insert your anti-BBC fixation into the thread are noted. At question here is the behavior of The Sun, not your BBC thing.

What has the age and salary of the person The Sun is on a hate fest for got to do with anything, or are they something else to hate?

Well done Biden.