Chomper Higgot

More ill informed nonsense. The Democrat party has plenty of talent and is not engaged in any kind of ‘leader cult’.

She’s a barking. Has she forgotten the events in Syria and Russia driving refugees into Europe while Trump sat back and let Putin do whatever he wanted. Capitulation is not peace and has resulted in what capitulation always results in. Oh and let’s not forget that bit about why Truss was really removed by her own party - fiscal insanity. …… I recall a member of this forum posting that he fancied her. Let that sink in.

He has the look of a man sucking on the taste of aluminum.

I have little doubt you are right in your conclusion. But since when did anyone accused of a crime need to provide evidence of their innocence?

Minor correction. The Trump DOJ put Cohen in prison for ‘that nothing’.

The people who told you this day would never come are now busy telling you he’s going to be acquitted.

If Trump is found guilt and it is turned over at appeal I will accept the appeal verdict. Hold me to it. ….. Now your turn. If Trump is convicted by the jury then his appeal is rejected by the Supreme Court or he fails to appeal, will you accept the Jury verdict?

So a guilty verdict that doesn’t get as far as appeal at the Supreme Court isn’t a guilty verdict?

I will accept whatever verdict the Jury hand down. Hold me to it. I have zero expectation that you will accept any guilt verdict against Trump under any conditions. Hold me to it.

All with intent to commit another crime, which raises the misdemeanor to a felony: https://manhattanda.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Donald-J.-Trump-Indictment.pdf

Where on earth did you drag that nonsense from? There 34 Indictments!

If Trump is convicted it will be by the Jury, not some bogeyman ‘left’. Which brings me to the following question: Will you accept the jury verdict whatever that verdict is?

What we must all keep in mind is we non of us have any idea of the scope and extent of the evidence and testimony that will be presented. It’s readily assume there are going to be a few bombshells.

Up steps Michael Cohen, witness and narrator. Moreover, Cohen is articulate and structures his words extremely well.

Imaginary threats of riot.

Causing the rioting that you yourself imagine to be the outcome of ents that did not happen. What an awful burden you carry around in your own head.

Why are you surprised I accept the reality that O J Simpson was found not guilty in his criminal trial? Let me make it easier for you to understand. O J Simpson was found not guilty. Deal with this reality.

Hope springs eternal. Todd Blanche tells Trump what Trump wants to hear shocker!

Daniels doesn’t need to resort to name calling, she can simply give her sworn testimony. Mind, her remarks graphically describing Trump’s anatomy were obviously directed to an audience of one. I wonder if the person Daniels was addressing will be in court to support her husband?

That doesn’t negate reasonable doubt. The glove performance introduced reasonable doubt.

The question is MAGA Kryptonite.

He’s not letting Trump attack the jurors either. Bad man!

There is no such thing as a person without bias. Jury members need only be able to judge the case solely on the merits of the evidence and testimony presented in the court room during the trial.

Trump on the same page as Putin. That’s new!

ok, you’ve put a lot of effort into arguing Trump should not be held accountable to the law. So let’s put it to the test: Will you accept any verdict handed down by any of the juries in any of Trump’s trials?