Chomper Higgot

I read the OP. I read your post too. Lived and worked in Saudi, got the T-shirt.

There is nothing fake out my disgust with your comment. Or indeed your inability to withdraw it and apologize. Utterly disgraceful behavior on your part.

The CPS article on the report on the CPS published by the CPS on the CPS website. Balanced?

What I get JingJing is this: That utterly disgraceful comment tells me exactly how much ‘good faith’ you are engaging in.

The forum rules prohibit me from saying exactly what kind of disgrace that statement is. Especially since only today I have refuted a claim by another member on this forum that Hitler did anything good.

I didn’t cherry pick, I summarized a single post you made. Here it is, ‘good faith’ sections underlined: with us or against us right there. Ad hominem right there. You yourself set a lit us test, refer ‘any Jew willing to… ‘above. You mis represent the marches, refer the Tim Adam’s’ article I linked, his first hand experience and the experiences of the maned Jews he quotes. Oh but you don’t accept that because Tim Adams and the named Jews he quotes fail your ‘litmus test’.

Post in good faith?! Like when you refer to Jews who exercise their democratic right to join a protest to end the killing in Gaza useful idiots’? And when you accuse me of being ‘too dim’ to get the point you make? Is that your idea of good faith posting Jing?

The headline is from the linked article and it does nothing if the sort.

The ‘with us our against us’ ‘litmus test’ so beloved of zealots of all persuasions. Calling Tim Adam’s a ‘useful idiot’ while reverting to hyperbole and character assassination. If you had any kind of well structured, fact based argument you wouldn’t need to resort to personal insults. “You proved my point but you're too dim to get it.” You don’t have a point, you simply throw mud at those who disagree with you.

Another example of the fact that the witnesses against Trump are not Democrats, but Republicans and or Trump’s own employees.

Sorry Jing, I’ve got absolutely no idea what that meant be about or how it relates in anyway to my post that I assume your were responding to. Have another go.

Not an ounce of self reflection.

No. I provided you a Jewish Journalists account of his own experience of the peace marches which he backed up with the accounts of other named Jews. You responded by calling it BS. I doubt very much you even read it.

Hitler did nothing good. The French didn’t impose anything on Germany that was not signed off on by Germany’s representatives at the surrender.

The view you had on the day was selected for you by the editor running the camera crews, s/he decided which camera would be streamed and when. Also missing from your already edited view of the events on the day, are the events l, discussions, and planning that lead up to the attack on the Capitol. You don’t need to rely on any documentaries to fill that gap in your view; you can go straight to the evidence and sworn testimonies submitted before open courts of law and the convictions handed down by juries.

That’s not what the history of Nazi Germany tell us.

Thank you for your attention to my posts.

If you, or any other member made a racist remark I would call it out. I have not called you a racist. You do seem though to a problem with me using the term ‘racist’ in a thread in which the core issue is racism, refer the OP. Taking the trouble to trawl through my posts to count how many times I have used the term ‘racist’ suggests a certain sensitivity on your part. Your count is now way off.

I take it you read the report and felt the need to provide an example of the attitudes towards the victims of sexual offenses it mentions. the report paints a distressing picture of the prevailing attitudes towards victims of sexual offences.

I haven’t accused you of anything Nick. A sensitive never maybe, but that’s not an accusation, it’s an observation. And I did apologize for unintentionally striking it. So what’s this accusation you came across while scrolling through all my posts to perform your word count?

It’s amazing the effect being under oath has on people’s sudden clarity of what they want to say: ”When Republican members of the committee attempted to press Hur on whether he found Biden to be “senile”, he said, “I did not. That conclusion does not appear in my report.” https://amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/mar/12/key-takeaways-house-hearing-robert-hur-biden-report

Sorry to keep you waiting Nick. Is that your ace card? Now please identify my accusation so we can all be assured you didn’t waste your ‘One of my lodgers is black’ ace in the hole.

To put it simply. No he is not. Perhaps you would find such a claim something easier to deal with, hence your loaded question.

I think overt racism and ‘she should be shot’ are something of concern. You might of course disagree.

Forgive me Nick, I seem to have hit a nerve, it was not intentional.