Chomper Higgot

I take it that’s you not renewing your visa next year then.

But the person who started the war is the guy Republicans refuse to criticize.

1 Corinthians 13:11 I recommend the KJV

Trump ‘giving aid and comfort to those who have engaged in insurrection’. It’s a behavior that gets a mention in The Constitution.

I don’t know if it’s completely random, but you’ve at last posted something I agree with.

And the war monger making war in Europe right now with his illegal invasion of Ukraine.

So close the legal means to make a living, what means of supporting themselves do you suppose these people would turn to? Do you think making people outlaws might leave them prey to criminals? Maybe not even criminals, employ an ‘outlawed immigrant’ to do your yard work then refuse to pay them, they can’t go to the cops can they? Let’s see if you can think stuff through?!

Don’t get me wrong, grifters extorting money from their marks is often legal, or in the dark grey shadows of legality. It’s not the legality I’m referring to but Trump’s habit of grifting, his marks’ willingness to be conned and the obvious question ’why does a billionaire need to beg money off anyone?’

Just one example, among many, of the judge being extremely and overtly fair to Trump.

The proxy war that Putin started, how accommodating of him to help Biden out like that. Or is it that your departure from reality is getting beyond the realms of even the most fetid imaginings?

In the subject of ‘money grubbing’ has Trump started using this ruling against him to fleece his supporters yet?

Clutch those straws if they bring you comfort. Remember, past performance is no guarantee of future returns.

Which in a civil trial is a smart strategy. The case is settled on which party the Jury believes to be the most credible. Trump’s refusal to provide a sample is an example of raising doubts about the credibility of his defense. Unlike a criminal case, in a civil case the jury cans draw inference from either party refusing to cooperate or provide disclosure, in common parlance ‘if he were innocent he would have cooperated’. Smart work by Carroll and her legal team, characteristically dumb work by Trump and his lawyers.

Always assuming Trump has $83.3 Million to hand. If he does now, he might very well not have after NY has done with him.

Forgive me if I hit a nerve, it was entirely un intended.

I’m saving adding the good stuff for the ruling from Trump’s NY Fraud Trial. Given the brouhaha kicked up by his fluffers over $83.3million, the $hundred of millions in the NY case should have a few heads exploding.

Not everyone loved him before he went into politics. He was widely despised, especially in NY City.

Section 3 of the 14th Amendment permits Congress to remove the disability, it does not state Congress has any part in deciding if the disability has been applied by the actions of the individual under consideration.

Clearly you do not.

Those arguing the President should be above the law clearly do not want a Republic.

You don’t have to believe it, the court ruling is in.

Really, is that what the U.K. Times reported, ‘a guilty verdict’?

Do stick around.

Trolling? You made a claim, you provided a link and a quote, neither of which backed up your claim. Forgive me for pointing out your assertion is baseless.

Your isolation from the real world and real people is almost complete.