Jump to content

Chomper Higgot

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    37,226
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    39

Everything posted by Chomper Higgot

  1. Trump’s lawyer has been exposed to COVID. https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4421484-e-jean-carroll-trial-trump-lawyers-covid/amp/
  2. ‘Mechanics of the case’? The divorce court judge will examine if Willis has an argument to negate the subpoena that calls for her testimony, Willis has made compelling arguments to court in her filing. The criminal court judge will examine if the allegations have any legal bearing on the criminal case and if they present evidence of the defendant’s rights having been infringed. The accuser has made a very weak argument with zero grounds or evidence of his rights to a fair trial having been infringed.
  3. You need to go back to law school, or calm your hyperbole, which might be more difficult but definitely cheaper.
  4. “Impropriety” Alleged “impropriety”. As you accept, the allegations have no legal bearing in the case Willis is prosecuting.
  5. The allegations are alleged to be criminal. Until investigated they remain mere allegations. Of course the allegations themselves may have been made with criminal intent, refer Willis’ filing.
  6. The issue is whether or not the allegations are being made to intimidate the AG and interfere with the prosecution she is fronting. As mentioned in her filing to the court.
  7. Short form for saying the allegations against Willis have no legal bearing on the case she’s prosecuting.
  8. Of course he did. The wife needs to get better legal advice, she’s being played by her coconspirators.
  9. Well ‘an opinion’ is one of those things we all have. I doubt you could give an accurate definition of a Marxist without first looking it up.
  10. I don’t support Israel or Hamas. ”Anti-Zionist”? You’ve mentioned this a number of times, I therefore assume it’s not a mistake, which begs the question: Do you have any idea at all what you are talking about? You certainly have no evidence to back up your hogwash assertions.
  11. I challenge you to find any prediction I made in 2016, you certainly won’t find any on this forum. Let’s see if you can work that out.
  12. Nice dodge. You have provided zero evidence to back up your hogwash assertion.
  13. Who was chanting “River to the sea, Palestine will be free” and even if you know who, how do you know they were Democrats?
  14. Ditto: Disapproving of Biden’s response to the Israel Hamas war does not equate to “‘support Hamas in their effort to eradicate Israel’.“
  15. Disapproving of Biden’s response to the Israel Hamas war does not equate to “‘support Hamas in their effort to eradicate Israel’.“
  16. Protesting in support of Hamas? Show your evidence.
  17. Willis has filed a response to the divorce case of her accuser(s), it’s an object lesson in baiting the bull and getting the consequences. Expect criminal conspiracy indictments against her accusers in the not too distant future.
  18. ‘Could be’ is not a fact it’s and obfuscation. But but Biden is whataboutary.
  19. It certainly doesn’t stop new evidence piling up. Trump is working had at just that.
×
×
  • Create New...