Chomper Higgot

Business leaders aren’t happy: ”The auto chief said business “needs three things from the UK government: ambition, commitment and consistency. A relaxation of 2030 would undermine all three”.” https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/net-zero-rishi-sunak-2050-2030-b2414879.html

We’ve got one!

Here’s a curious thing. I’ve searched every post in this thread, nobody, absolutely nobody who is a member of this forum accuses Brand of being a rapist in this thread. There is however an accusation of others branding Brand a rapist, here it is: Methinks someone complains too much.

Same political party would be my guess.

But here’s a thing. Starmer modified his policy ideas following Truss’ vandalism of the national economy, clearly stating policies must be fully funded. Sunak is thrashing around trying to come up with something, anything at all, that will reverse his party’s abysmal polling data. And here’s another thing. Who does Sunak think he’s going to attract to vote Tory with this latest U-Turn? The anti environment vote is already firmly in the Tory bag, he can only alienate voters who are concerned about the environment and galvanize opposition to Tory anti-environment policies.

Erm, there’s only one party in power.

Which of the policies Sunak says he is going to U-Turn on are paid for by Government? Money spent on new technologies is money circulated in the economy on which taxes are paid. Perhaps Sunak wishes to let energy companies off the hook for their share of the costs.

But I didn’t. I even told you that you were responding to a misquote. But you persisted. My goodness admitting your error is difficult for you.

Details matter Johnny, here’s a detail for you: Look very carefully! Now if you feel you are up to offering an apology I’m all ears. And I will be gracious in acceptance.

Did SpiderMike use the word rape? Or did he just say ‘guilty’? Rape is only one of the accusations against Russell.

Really Johnny, you can do better. Here’s your post, go see what you were actually replying to and less of this offering another post as some kind of justify for your error: Let’s have a bit more honesty from you. We all make mistakes, it’s no big deal, admitting your won’t hurt, too much.

So nobody here on this forum then?

You responded to a post that was attributing a quote to me, that was not from a post I made. Simple.

I look forward to the election.

I know what ‘Due Process’ is, but unless there is a ‘process’ written into the terms of service then no ‘due process’ can exist. If you allege that Brand has not been afforded due process you first have to demonstrate there is any due process to be applied.

But it wasn’t.

Not me, perhaps I missed the others or got distracted by his accusers being referred to as ‘sluts’. Eitherway, Russell Brand is accused of rape, actually stating Russell Brand is a rapist without him having been found guilty of that heinous crime is of course unacceptable.

It wasn’t me making any ‘suggestions’ about Russell.

Is anyone here ‘Branding’ (like your pun) Russell Brand a rapist?

Where is your evidence that a couple of lefties on YouTube have done anything of the sort?

More to the point. Have we forgotten so soon the anger and hair pulling that ensued when it was revealed the BBC and others had failed to act immediately in response to accusations against others accused of sexual misconduct?

No by pointing out that while he objects to an accusation because there hasn’t been a trial yet, he at the same time offers up a statement that cannot be held true/or false until there has been a trial. Before we go further, is this going to be another of your sophistry kicks today?

Stop dodging: The power of the US to declare war resides with Congress, private citizens may not declare war. US Jews never declared war on Nazi Germany, there is no means by which they could do so.

Erm, identifying his hypocrisy.

He don’t view videos in discussions, but I agree with your comment.