Chomper Higgot

‘Local elections’ Russian style. Invade a sovereign nation, ethnically cleanse a portion of the land seized leaving only ethnic Russians, hold an election. Get the expected result. Move to next piece of seized land, wash, rinse repeat.

Perhaps Biden should withhold aid to Ukrainian youths can be sent to the front lines without any weapons.

And of course Putin will stop at Ukraine. I suggest you revisit the history of appeasement.

And trillions in tax breaks to the hyper wealthy.

I think they are anti-war against the aggressors, and in particular this specific aggressor.

It was never in dispute. But neither was it the issue you were referring to in your post: Wriggle away.

It was never in dispute. But neither was it the issue you were referring to in your post: Wriggle away.

I’m sure Putin agrees. He often does agree with the right wing and to Biden point of view. Or have I got that the wrong ways about?

I think it’s all UK residents, I’m not aware of a nationality requirement.

I don’t recall ever disputing any of that. But thanks for posting anyhow.

Legal challenges on the way: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/sep/21/rishi-sunak-likely-to-face-legal-challenges-over-net-zero-u-turn

Mind reader? You seem to know a lot about this guy for whom I have related only very limited information. There is no ‘entitlement’ for that which is excluded by the rules of entitlement. If the rules say a person is above the wealth threshold then unless they meet the ‘continuing medical care clause’ they must pay towards their care. Hiding wealth or falsifying statements in order to get access to ‘free’ care that one is not entitled to is scrounging. But of course ‘scroungers’ can’t possibly be people who have personal wealth, ‘scroungers’ are by definition poor people.

I think he’s more concerned about his mother not making the contributions she is required to make out of her money that he hopes to inherit. I doubt he regards himself as a spounger, but clearly spoiling it is his intent.

I’ll take your word on that.

One could. And I suspect most who do also swallow and regurgitate conspiracies of all kinds.

You mean you were talking about any other country on the planet except the one that is the subject of the thread. Gotcha.

She’s just like Brand, she’s realized there’s more money to be made spewing conspiracies than there is in telling the truth.

You should try The Guardian, never had been ‘Pro-War’.

You were responding to my comment about a guy who was using his legal skills to get free old age car for his mother, we were not discussing general NHS care until you embarrassed yourself with a lack of knowledge on the matter. Having posted your comments regarding the fairness of people who have saved and accrued wealth having to pay you’ll have difficulty claiming you were not engaging in a discussion on care in old age. But I’m sure you will at least try.

Sorry, I like dealing with the reality of how it is. Your fanciful thoughts on why some folk aren’t sufficiently wealthy to fund their own care in old age are just that, fanciful. Your statement “For those who have worked, paid tax and NI, NHS care is not a benefit. It's an entitlement” reads like an assertion of fact, all be it misinformed.

Incorrect. Care in old age is means tested. I thought you worked in the care industry and if so how are you not aware of that fact. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/social-care-and-support-guide/help-from-social-services-and-charities/financial-assessment-means-test/#:~:text=A financial assessment or means,savings less than £23%2C250.

Can you tell me the last time the UK electorate were not able to replace the UK Government by means of an ejection?

Forgive me, it was a typo, an error on my part. My intended term was ‘asylum seekers’

The failing Government’s failing policies are not going to continue beyond the next election.

If you’ll be more precise on who the ‘dealers’ are I’ll be able to say whether I agree or not.