Jump to content

Chomper Higgot

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    37,159
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    39

Everything posted by Chomper Higgot

  1. The Saudi’s don’t eat pork, but they don’t mind buying it. Billions pouring into Trump and his family from Saudi Arabia. Has Trump been ‘Causeway wrapped’? This absolutely deserves investigation.
  2. If the DOJ doesn’t want to prosecute it simply demurs, no need to offer any ‘immunity deal’, just don’t proceed. If someone is given an immunity deal, they have given something in return. Perhaps somebody feels it in the best interest of their client’s safety to not disclose what was traded in return.
  3. That’s the problem with letting your imagination run wild,. You confuse yourself.
  4. For the record. I’m all in favor of nobody being above the law, not a President (past or present) nor the children of a President (past or present) - regardless of who the President is. I do however suspect some here delighting in this report will sing from a different song sheet within the not too distant future.
  5. Time for a class action against the mall on the basis of not providing a safe environment.
  6. So you don’t understand the concept of ‘the corollary, (when applied to matters of race). Knock me down with a feather.
  7. The Chinese have experience of how a foreign power can use narcotics to addict a population and render a nation powerless. Narcotics as a weapon against another nation, I wonder who came up with that heinous idea?
  8. I’m very mindful of the fact it is FOX (confessed liars) who are leaking these details. I maintain my belief that FOX are lying about why they have pulled Carlson. I look forward to hearing the real reason.
  9. I think it’s what’s known as ‘A tell’.
  10. Like when did protecting children against abuse or industrial injury ever register on the GOP scale of important issues?
  11. What I find remarkable is that not only have these individuals thrown their careers away for Trump (common enough in Trump world), but they did so by signing their names on the evidence of the crimes they committed. I can imagine some ill educated MAGA loon doing that, but trained lawyers? What on earth were they thinking?!
  12. Immunity deals involve a proffer and in most cases will involve a formal acceptance of guilt, recorded in a proffer letter. The individual admits guilt and the prosecutor agrees not to indict. The proffer letter is entered in the court records and is therefore a formal record of criminal guilt, itself enough for disbarment.
  13. ‘bringing up skin color’. As is overtly racist comments. Well yes we all understand you think ‘that is nothing’.
  14. I had hoped to be in the UK for the Coronation, unfortunately my travel plans had to change so I’ll miss the event. I will however raise a glass of a fine single malt to toast King Charles. I rather like the man.
  15. It might be an idea in a UK related thread to apply the definitions according to UK law.
  16. I believe, regardless of who is USAG, throwing explosive devices at police officers is a crime, doubly so when the resulting explosion injuries the target police officers. Funny how the rightwing go all fuzzy on their ‘tough on crime’ mantra when it’s one of their own in the cross hairs of Justice.
  17. The courts have already handed down multiple verdicts of sedition. It was an attempt to overthrow the election and thereby overthrow the transfer of power to the elected government. So yes, sedition and an attempted coup.
  18. It was an explosive device that has been assessed by an FBI explosives expert to be capable of: ”inflicting damage to surrounding property as well as seriously injuring persons in the vicinity of the resultant explosion. And in further: Several officers were injured as a result of the explosion.
  19. They have however stated it was an explosive device, the explosives expert also gave an assessment as follows: “An Explosives and Hazardous Devices Examiner with the Federal Bureau of Investigations was unable to conclusively identify the precise dimensions, charge size, or whether the device thrown was improvised or commercially manufactured; however, based on reviewing the various video angles that captured the explosive was able to conclude the device was capable of inflicting damage to surrounding property as well as seriously injuring persons in the vicinity of the resultant explosion. Several officers were injured as a result of the explosion.” https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/florida-man-arrested-felony-charges-actions-during-jan-6-capitol-breach-0
  20. Odd then that you yourself are staying with certainty what the device was.
×
×
  • Create New...