Chomper Higgot

You can determine my real views from my comments, what I actually say, not what you might wish to think I have said.

What’s interesting is the same people who are elsewhere defending the police for the unlawful killing of a man on the basis of allegedly resisting arrest, are here defending another man for throwing an explosive device at police officers. I wonder if it has anything to do with the characteristics of the subject men in each case?

There were no election irregularities. “Let’s off a fire cracker”? It wasn’t a protest it was a violent seditious attack, as confirmed by recent convictions handed down by the courts.

I’ll refer you to the official FBI notice of arrest and charges. If you have evidence beyond that contradicts the FBI notice, I’m sure Daniel Ball’s attorneys will be delighted to hear from you.

Oh right, so you want to discuss the charges brought against an individual (taking part in a violent sedition) but you want to do so without making reference to the official FBI notification of the arrest and charges. Break your own habit of trying to avoid recorded and published facts you can’t deal with.

De what coming, allegations of allegations? Or GOP smoke-screening with allegations of allegations? Let me know when something with any substance to it turns up.

I’m glad we agree. As I said, it was something warranting arrest on Federal felony charges.

It was something warranting arrest on Federal felony charges. If you have evidence to the contrary do let us know. https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/pr/florida-man-arrested-felony-charges-actions-during-jan-6-capitol-breach-0

It could have been lots of this, you know how some people obfuscate and minimize crimes.

So we are now into armed sedition territory.

Yes it is. But if you allege the crime you need to provide the evidence to back up the allegation. An allegation of an allegation is evidence of diddly-squat.

Glad to hear your good health news Simon.

There is no such thing as a ‘pro-abortion’ charity. They are ‘Pro-choice’. Pro abortion does exist, Hershel Walker was pro-abortion.

And so far zilch. Don’t hold your breath.

Blaming Trump publicly won’t get their sentence reduced, it’s simply an example of the self pity and ‘always somebody else’s fault’ that characterizes the Alt-Right. They could however cooperate and provide testimony against their co-conspirators in their acts of sedition. With five convicted of the extremely serious crime of seditious conspiracy, the opportunities for a high stakes game of the ‘Prisoner’s Dilemma’ are clear and present. Jack be nimble, Jack be quick.

What’s the point of being a billionaire if you can’t own a SCOTUS Justice to go with your collection from Congress and the Senate?

That’s not an excuse, but it is an opportunity for the FBI to ask the question: ’Tell us more’ we might be able to help you out?!

That nothing burger has just turned into convictions for ‘Seditious Conspiracy’. But well done, you’re bang on that trajectory of denying the path of Justice I predicted so many months back.

And there ladies and gentlemen ends the debate over whether or not the J6 attack was a protest or an act of sedition. From now on we can all refer to the J6 sedition and reference court verdicts to demonstrate this to be true.

Excellent news. Now to follow the trail of the conspiracy. The serious jail time these guys are facing opens an opportunity for a cooperation deal. Rat upwards and reduce your sentence, it’s a deal to be considered.

Another one of those ‘could be’. It’s not for anyone on this forum to explain where any of these alleged transactions came from or for what purpose. It’s not even for any of the Biden’s to make such an explanation. If Comer, or indeed you, wish to make criminal accusations, then it is for Comer, or indeed you, to provide evidence of criminality. I, and I’m sure many others amongst the members of this forum, frequently make international cash transfers in excess of $10,000, each of which will get flagged by the corresponding banks. These transactions and the flags attached to these transactions are not evidence of criminality.

I’m going with 2.

The Hill is reporting Trump is returning to ‘probably attend the trial’. It’s all theatrics. First decline the opportunity to testify before the court. Then when Trump realizes he’s likely to lose the case, turn up too late to testify. Then claim to his followers he was denied the right to testify in his own defense and claim the trial rigged against him. https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/3987892-trump-says-he-will-probably-attend-e-jean-carroll-trial-to-confront-this/

Wrong thread, wrong President. But yes I agree.

There’s the little problem of evidence of crimes, getting a Grand Jury to indict on the evidence and a Jury to convict on the evidence. I’m sure the ‘too old and too senile’ excuse to avoid trial, jail or remaining in jail will show up in the not too distant future, but it won’t have Biden’s name attached to it.