Chomper Higgot

Or manipulated the photos, or cropped the trees.

No it is not about ‘England and Ireland’ It’s between the UK, Eire and the EU.

While House Republicans ‘investigate the issue’ they might want to cast an eye over this, but I somehow doubt they will: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-china-cdc-exclusiv-idUSKBN21C3N5

Sunak’s spots the glaringly obvious, and then opens his mouth and talks about it: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2023/feb/28/sunak-northern-ireland-access-uk-eu-markets-trade-deal

It’s what’s know as a loaded question. Fools fall for it.

Isn’t there a subject to this thread you should be discussing instead?

Parliament has every right.

Pointing out an observable fact is not ‘knocking the Royal family’.

British people can still get married, they just have to wait until they are adults.

Yet another example of a Republican accusation turning out to be a confession. It’s a thing.

Another baseless ad hominem

The NI Protocol is a direct result of Brexit.

I’ll tell you what I am not. I’m not the topic of discussion.

He’s done a great job wrapping the NI Protocol in some pretty paper and selling it to the Tories and DUP without actually changing it. Border in the Irish Sea, no hard border between NI and Eire, ECJ retains role as final arbiter of EU law as it impacts the Protocol and Trade between the EU and NI. The more interesting development is the clear break from deliberately antagonizing the EU to a more pragmatic and cooperative approach.

There is no Constitutional right to carry a gun on anyone else’s private property or within the bounds of private premises. High time for US businesses to start looking after the safety of their customers and ban firearms from their premises.

Pick a random religious extremist view, and then compare posts in this thread with that religious extremist view.

Well make your mind up. Do women have autonomy over their own bodies or what?

The British Royal family are the most notable example of first cousin marriage. Which in any case isn’t the topic of discussion. Sorry to interrupt your flow.

You’ve just changed the definition of ‘foreign’. I know two people who were married at sixteen, both definitely long time British. This is a very positive change to the law.

FOX does however have a long history of trouble reporting the facts.

The comments made by Scott Adams on social media certainly were racist. How about discussing those, are you even willing to accept Scott Adams comments were racist?

Or at least it seems Sunak thinks it’s done and dusted. I genuinely wish him good luck. But, as I said first off, let’s see what the deal is and let’s see the response of the extreme rightwing of the Tory Party.

To some he won’t.

Why would anyone be offended over a well known overt racist being called out for their racist remarks? Why all the whataboutary and sophistry?

The evidence of racist remarks is a bit of a stumbling block for that argument.