Chomper Higgot

Except he clearly has not, otherwise he’d not be messing around with the Brexit treaty he signed.

Muck can’t be raked unless there is muck to be raked. Another day another pile of Tory muck exposed.

The whip has already been withdrawn.

We’ll certainly not something Government, Federal or State should be regulating.

I think my comment goes very well with you apparent lack of understanding on the subject you yourself were discussing.

You might want to contemplate the historical reasons why Germany has not militarized over say the past 70 years or so.

She answered perfectly without embroiling herself in rightwing culture wars. She’s clearly s very savvy lady.

She did,

And what exactly is your problem with that?

But there were other criteria too, like qualifications and experience. A selection screening that resulted in such an excellent candidate.

Which was irrelevant

But you said earlier ‘Sole’ reason. Hence my suggestion you stop making stuff up.

How do you know what her motives were, did she tell you?

Excellent, but it doesn’t dent the ‘outrage’.

They were not ‘nominated for the sole reason they are women’, stop making stuff up.

She should stick to what’s relevant and not rise to politicized baiting. And when she does this we get outrage from the rightwing.

Denied the right to vote is an example.

No you aren’t, you are dreaming up ludicrous hyperbole.

There is a long shameful history of people being denied basic constitutional rights and freedoms based upon their gender. A SC Justice comes along who makes it very clear that Gender will play no role in her reading of the law. Response: Outrage from the right wing.

More hyperbole. Where is this ludicrous thing happening? It’s not and it’s ludicrous to suggest it might.

Do people have a right to equal Justice under the law regardless of any other consideration than that they seek/face Justice?

So sex offenders that attack women are only male or transgender? Would it be a different problem if this know offender was acting suspiciously in a men’s toilet? Would it be a different problem if this known offender was acting suspiciously in a mixed gender toilet? What’s the issue, the known offender’s gender or the known offenders behavior? How does this even get to the Supreme Court? Nobody has the right to commit sex crimes regardless of gender.

It’s also totally off topic. Has anybody evidence that Justice Brown Jackson is not qualified for the job?

No it’s not. ‘Equal Justice Under The Law’ must by the very nature of the statement be blind to matters of Gender. Regardless of gender all are entitled to equal Justice. https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/about.aspx

A bit of a switch there. The accusation was Marsha Blackburn is far right. Slipping in a bit of obfuscation about the GOP.