robblok

Yea its not so strange to remember a suitcase that 2 people need to carry that is not usual. You are really scraping the bottom of the barrel. Like i said all on itself not really damming but combined it makes a pretty good case.

Ah now you change from similar to identical like it says in the report. All the evidence on itself is indeed not that damming but when you add it all together it makes the case 2 go in 1 comes out suitcase so heavy needs 2 men to carry blood stains remembered identical suitcase On itself each can be disputed but put all together makes a hard case. The judges in Spain at least thought there was enough evidence while you keep cherry-picking newspaper articles.

Similar is good enough what are the chances. I mean all this together makes the case. Do you know the guy or something like that that your so dead set on defending him and taking press info over evidence that judges have seen. I mean that makes no sense. You ignore all the clear evidence and go into details from the press.

The press is never wrong.. i mean so many conflicting stories already... i rather not take press info as real. I like this evidence as seen by professional judges much more. The Thai press cocks up so often its hard to take that as fact. But how do you explain the that the body ended up in his suitcase (something stated in the court statements) backed up with evidence that judges have seen.

Evidence of this please.. i mean your asking me for evidence but you take your unsubstantiated stuff as evidence while stuff checked by a professional judge is not valid according to you. Talk about bias. 14. The Audiencia Nacional also contended that Thailand had carried out a comprehensive investigation into the events in question and, on the basis of the evidence submitted, there were reasonable grounds to believe that the applicant could have participated in the murder. The Audiencia Nacional furthermore noted that the applicant was accused of a standard offence (delito ordinario); it was not linked with any political activity.

Will be presented in court. Just the fact it was his suitcase and if they have the proof would be so damming combined with the rest that a guilty verdict is almost certain. If they have good proof of this then end of story. 14. The Audiencia Nacional also contended that Thailand had carried out a comprehensive investigation into the events in question and, on the basis of the evidence submitted, there were reasonable grounds to believe that the applicant could have participated in the murder. The Audiencia Nacional furthermore noted that the applicant was accused of a standard offence (delito ordinario); it was not linked with any political activity. You havent seen it the judges have. Maybe better to let professionals handle this.

The white minivan that in some news reports was seen in kanchanaburi is mentioned here too. But your missing the biggest part of the evidence HIS suitcase. Explain your way out of that one please.

Blood and missing pillow is something people remember and a suitcase having carried by 2 also. Anyone not seeing this is obvious bias. The fact alone that she was not seen going out is not important but combine with blood and a heavy suitcase. (that is something that really stands out) makes the proof easier. Then a minivan to Kanchanaburi and found in HIS suitcase. No not damming at all.. are you so bias you cant see the evidence ? Guess professional judges also found it sufficient to extradite so that says enough. Unlike you they are a bit less bias.

The rest is damming enough. Totally different from your story and the fact they see 2 go in and only 1 ever come out is pretty damming too. Plus a too heavy suitcase that needed 2 to handle. Same suitcase as the one he used in the hotel is where here body was found in. That is really damming so yes I am now even more convinced of his guilt. Especially now seeing this evidence instead of all the rumors on the forum. I wonder if @Mr Meeseeks still thinks he is being framed reading some actual court information instead of the rumor mill.

5. The Thai Government sent to the Spanish authorities a report prepared by the Thai police, which contained a summary of the evidence gathered against the applicant in respect of the crimes that he had allegedly committed. According to the report, the applicant had entered Thailand via Suvarnabhumi Airport (Bangkok) on 31 October 2014. He had murdered a Thai woman, aged 27, on the night of 1-2 November 2014, while she had been in his hotel room in Bangkok. The woman had worked as a prostitute in a bar, and she had been recorded by video cameras leaving the bar with the applicant on the night in question. They had also been witnessed entering the hotel together. The next day the applicant had checked out of the hotel and had asked a bellboy to help him carry his suitcase outside. The bellboy later reported that the suitcase had been very heavy and that two persons had been needed to carry it to the van in which the applicant had then driven away. The woman had not been seen leaving the room. One of the hotel's cleaners had declared that some of the applicant's bedroom sheets had had bloodstains on them and that one of the pillows had been missing. 6. On 6 November 2014, a man reported that he had found a suitcase in a river. The suitcase, identical to one owned by the applicant, contained the woman's body, as well as several stones and rocks together weighing over 12 kg. A witness declared that the decorative stones found in the suitcase were identical to some bought from him by the applicant. According to another witness, the applicant lived in a house in Thailand for about six months every year. The clothes he had been wearing on the night of 1 November 2014 were found in that house following a search. His DNA (taken from some of his possessions) was compatible with DNA samples taken from the victim's nails and skin on her waist. The applicant left Thailand on the Padang train for Malaysia on 27 November 2014. Yes this is great thanks for finding it it confirms that they have good evidence. Unlike some people seem to suggest.

Oh if i had done it i would buy some plastic bags for my clothes or maybe i buy the suitcase locally if i done it there unplanned. Anyway easy to explain not really evidence. And 50 kg is not that heavy its stated he lifts weights like me. For guys like that 50 kg is moveable. Though it would be heavy but there is stuff available tike suitcase trollies ect. Not really something impossible to do. Remember the same things of moving the body would have to be done by a much smaller Thai man. So if they can do it why would Looker not be able. Unless the people who say it was a Thai would think it was a group.

That would be even worse IMHO. I mean they your really disturbing your neighbors like with smoking on the balcony but worse. This guy took effort to not bother people. It still might be against regulations.

Lets hope that the prosecutor takes option 5 or that reporters bring this out if he does not resulting in protests. This definitely fits this number 5

Some would take the word of a white guy always without even considering that judges of other countries have looked at it odd.. Almost af it they think white guys dont commit crimes. Especially if they are fellow countrymen. While i know for a fact there are murderers in my country. They travel too.

Hate saying it but murder means the intention to kill, I doubt it because like you said can't get money from a dead man. Then it should be like manslaughter with torture added making it a harsher sentence. But legally I m not sure its murder. Been looking at some legal definitions of murder one does state What Is the Legal Definition of Murder? Under the common law (law originating from custom and court decisions rather than statutes), murder was an intentional killing that was: unlawful (in other words, not legally justified), and committed with "malice aforethought." Malice aforethought doesn't mean that a killer has to have acted out of spite or hate. It exists if a defendant intends to kill someone without legal justification or excuse. In addition, in most states, malice aforethought isn't limited to intentional killings. It can also exist if the killer: intentionally inflicts serious bodily harm that causes the victim's death, or behaves in a way that shows extreme, reckless disregard for life and results in the victim's death. This way it could be murder but this is US law. Not sure about Thai law. In the Dutch legal system this would not be murder by death by fault or manslaughter because the intention to kill was not there. But maybe torture like this would change it it would certainly add to the penalty.

Id blame Thai reporting and police.

Of course they are safer as they get the virus less often as normal people so can spread it less too.

Not completely true it also curbs the spread a bit. Because vaccinated people get infected less often they can spread it less too. Its only logical. It can still spread it but at a far lower rate.

They should put up rewards as high as the guys got for going after sports cars for tips on police corruption. That would set them on each other and maybe clean up a bit.

If its an event that happens a lot why dont you move ? I been flooded during the 2011 flood for 2 months and would certainly move if this was a regular event. Or a yearly event.

I was not 100% sure been a while but just what i recall. But yes great example of how the law does not apply to those with power. But in this case there is video evidence. It might even be negligent not to press charges. This will be hard to brush away. But like you said not impossible.

Yes it is but maybe the uk could have given a larger timeframe or more warnings before. But yes I get it. Now a lot of Brits will have extra costs. Always hard making these kind of decisions no matter what they choose they are wrong same as in the Netherlands. Someone will always not be happy with it.

Most people are too lazy to read the full article. Its a thing that happens a lot on Thaivisa people commenting without reading or even understanding the full article.

Was that guys father not a famous politician on the Thaksin side. Charlem if i recall.

Not wrong but as you have read she can be fired. Just ask your friend what is more important his or her job or being antivax. I would know what i would say in times like this.