cleopatra2

Google have on a number of occasions had to defend themselves in court over copyright infringements.

I am not sure trustees can break the scheme rules

Just because your spouse is not entitled does not equate to this applies to others https://www.gov.uk/new-state-pension/inheriting-or-increasing-state-pension-from-a-spouse-or-civil-partner#:~:text=and working overseas-,Inheriting or increasing State Pension from a spouse or civil,you reach State Pension age.

That is not true. Anybody who gained pension entitlement prior to April 2016 is treated under the old rules. It is still possible to inherit a pension as a surviving spouse if specific conditions are met.

No automatic rights as a cohabitating couple. For any private pension will depend upon if named as beneficiary and scheme rules. Need to look at recent court judgements. For state pension , I think none. For inheritance will depend on any Will in force.

Can you give an example of such company indulging in copyright infringement. Under US law having no direct knowledge or intent of the infringement is not a defense. It would be expected that a company would carry out due diligence .

These are only statistics. They do not tell or indicate when or if infection. Will occur. Thailand 2017, 30% of new female hiv diagnosis occurred in the low risk group.

Yes

The current estimate for female to male transmission is 0.04%. This equates to 1 in 2000 to 1 in 3000. Of course the statistics do not tell at what point somebody is going to be infected. It could be their first or 1000th sexual act

I am not convinced about the statics quoted. The 1 in 1,000,000 is to optimistic. The rate in serodiscordant US couples is 1 in 10,000. A study In Kenya put the overall rate as 1 in 159. And at one time for Thailand sex workers it was 1 in 33

To the OP. If the person reached retirement before April 2016 then it is possible that a surving spouse will get a benefit from his pension. However eligibility is subject to other conditions. Retirement before April 2016 is subject to the old rules https://www.gov.uk/new-state-pension/inheriting-or-increasing-state-pension-from-a-spouse-or-civil-partner#:~:text=and working overseas-,Inheriting or increasing State Pension from a spouse or civil,you reach State Pension age.

No I was referring to government gateway ID verification. The government outsourced the verification process to third parties. A recent decision was made that a persons ID verification needed to be validated against a credit check. The third parties who did not use a credit source for verification did not have their contract renewed.

A number of providers contracts who verified IDs did not get renewed.

The question of the accounts legal owner needs to be known. Stating was not given permission is fudging the answer. If your ex does not have any legal ownership of the account , how was it possible to transfer the money.

I assume the legal jurisdiction is France. I am not familiar with the French legal system but give the following. The French definition of theft is fraudulent appropriation . From what you have described it is unclear if the bar of fraudulent has been reached. It is also contestable that by placing the monies into an account for the purpose of others that you have retained the ownership of the monies. Due to the act of Theft being a crime against the state , it would be the state prosecuting and yourself acting as a witness only. I fail to understand how in such circumstances an out of court settlement is possible. One further thought what stipulations was placed on the use of the monies. I know you stated it was to be used in case of your death to attend the funeral . However what was the intention if your children decided not to come for the funeral.

Sorry I am missing the logical equivalence.

There is a couple of fundamental questions that need to be asked. First one would be, guarantee the efficacy of any treatment bought online. Second question can you be sure that the animals diagnosis is correct. Have you actually sought the advice of a vet. Not all eye ailments require liquid medicine in the form of eye drops. On a number of occasions it may be preferable to give tetracycline or antibiotics in tablet form. Taking the above into account, is any potential saving by purchasing online justified by not using a vet.