cleopatra2

I think this highlights the coalitions dillema . If it is known that Pita will have a second chance . Then what is the incentive for the Senators or opposition parties to vote for Pita in the first round. They will simply not vote for Pita during the first vote. This will force Pita to negotiate and make concessions to gain the votes required for the second vote.

The wise move is for MF to drop the 112 amendment. ( It is unlikely to gain much support in Parliament). Then once Pita is PM to bring it forward for debate in the future.

In principle yes you can receive your pension before the age of 55 due to ill health. However the pension provider will more than likely have strict requirements on what constitutes ill health for early retirement. You will need to consult the Pension provider for the scheme details and requirements.

deleted

The House Speaker vote is next week. Postponing today's meeting with no date rescheduled does not give hope.

I think that the MFP wants to ditch PT. It is difficult to understand why the MFP refuse to negotiate with PT , knowing that alienating an alliance party spells disaster and risks parliamentary stalement. iMO taking into account what Pita has said recently about 112 amendments , that an arrangement has been reached with the senators and other military linked parties

I am not sure the article is written by the British Embassy. The link provided does not include the details provided in the post. The link is just the guidelines of what happens when a British citizen is caught on overstay.

But the obvious conflict of interest arises. The company is in dispute with the Government. Pita would be the leader of the Government.

Obviously events after the election proves this incorrect. Pita has since transferred the shares out of his name .

This analogy does not hold. In your analogy there is no law prohibiting the child to own the car, only to drive it. It would only become an issue if the child drove the car. The issue of the shareholding in this case, is the law states that holding of media shares is not allowed.

Politically if MF relinquish the PM position it will be seen as a betrayal to their voters.

The ruling on Pita will come to late to make that decision. MF have to go for both positions and risk the alliance with PT.

I think MFP need the Speaker position as a fall back position. If Pita is disqualified t the PM must come from another party. If MF relinquish the House Speaker say to PT and Pita is disqualified it is more than probable that the PM will be a PT candidate. Thus MF will have no power.

There were over 3,000 homicides recorded in England and Wales between 2015 to 2020

Let's take ITER The latest figures I have is Q=,10. That is 50MWin 500MW out in thermal energy. ITER have confirmed it now requires 440MW to operate the reactor. ITER also estimate that the 500MW of thermal energy will equate to 200MW of usable electricity Thus giving a Q (total ) of 200/440 =0.45 Thus for a plasma Q of 10 results in a Q total of 0.45

Fusion reactors are making pitifull progress. I accept that the energy produced can be more than the energy the lasers inject into the reaction ( Q >1 ), However this only represents somewhere in the region of 2% of the total energy required to be provided to the reactor . This is without taking into account that the energy produced is still not in a useable form and will incur further efficiency losses .

The fact that the company is not currently carrying out any media activities is moot. The only relevant question , is the company still registered as a media company ? In previous case of the printing business that no longer was operating , the court ruled that it was still a media business . Even though it had ceased to be operating any printing activities. The reasoning , the business had not official notified that it had ceased and thus could in future resurrect its printing activities.

Only the voters can sack the MP. The process as follows Select Committee recommend 10 day suspension. Parliament has a vote to suspend or not . 10% of voters required to request MP recall. Only at this stage the MP would be sacked.

From reading the article on the CC interpretation , to be inactive requires the company to be formally dissolved. The fact that the company is not currently carrying out any business is immaterial, ( from previous cases listed in the article),

This raises the question , why was the shares not transferred to their rightful owner earlier. What is still not clear , even as executor , did Pita inherit some of the shares .

If the UK changed the situation where British expats no longer entitled to the personal tax allowance. This would have the effect of removing entitlement of Thai wives or spouse to the tax allowance.

To me the possibility that due to the ongoing court case the legal ownership of the shares have not been transferred yet. Thus the estate is the legal owner .

I have never claimed to know the facts. The article states that the shares were left to Pita thus he is the owner. The judge quotes heritage manager , not heritage owner. Whilst Pita has claimed that the shares belong to his family and acting as executor. This statement is somewhat ambiguous , is Pita claiming that he has no ownership or beneficiary from any of the shares. If Pita is the true owner of any shares then that would be a violation of the constitution .

From the article Pita owns the shares. Normally an heritage manager would not be a beneficiary. Pita as owner has to be a beneficiary and thus the true owner. If this proves to be the case . The EC has only one option but to ask the CC to disqualify . Any other outcome would be a form of corruption where a candidate receives favourable treatment due to popularity.

As the eldest son , under Thai inheritance law would the shares or part of automatically be passed down to Pita. If a will does exist it seems inconceivable that Pita would be excluded from any beneficiary of the shares. like most people here I do not know the facts. It would appear that Pita is depending upon a technicality of being executor and not yet official owner.