cleopatra2

Ok cheers Missed that

Can you clarify if you have cancelled the booking. Your OP is a bit ambiguous In one paragraph you state that you requested a return of deposit because of wanting to cancel The next following paragraph the manager refuses even though you would not be picking up the vehicle for another 2 weeks. The 2nd paragraph can be read as though the booking is still active.

The issue I see is that you entered into an agreement and then terminated that agreement. Normally in such contracts/agreements contain penalty clauses exist within certain limitations. The deposit usually is only withheld and released after the rental agreement has been concluded. Depending upon the agreement and termination it is possible that the company is waiting to deduct any termination penalties before releasing the deposit. It all depends upon what you agreed to.

This is the part that raises a red flag for me. If this statement is accurate it would invalidate the drivers insurance. An insurance company will not insure a criminal act.

Yes. However Britman last update states the police dropped the case. His wife who is evidently well connected lost interest in going to court after being enthusiastic. The police officer dealing with the case died unexpectedly. Whilst I don't dispute the accident occured , some of the other aspects are suspect

If I recall the original incident as reported by the OP. He was slowing down approaching red lights when hit in the rear by a vehicle. This is a big step to make a claim of attempted murder , as opposed to just a traffic accident. To satisfy the murder claim intent to kill would need to be established.

If you want gpu onboard CPU then you need to avoid the F version of the CPU as these do not have integrated graphics.

Does that include yourself ? Joking aside, most people stop learning the language at the basic to low intermediate level. Unfortunately this is less than the standard of a child in the native language. The majority of adults when conversing in their native language with other adults expect the level of conversation to be of an equal standard. An Adult will find the conversation uninteresting if the other adult speaker can only communicate in a child like manner.

British Nationals are being discriminated against. For examlple , women , young workers , and the disabled are group of workers that are likely to be on the lower end of pay.

I really do not understand the purpose of the question. Whatever checks the Passport Office carry out regarding passing information to other departments is moot. When a passport is due for renewal then it requires to be renewed. The alternative is either return to the UK or let the passport expire with the consequences of becoming illegal. What information is shared across departments cannot be mitigated .

In addition for every migrant sent and accepted by Rwanda. The UK has to pay for the migrants upkeep and support for 5 years. In effect the UK taxpayer is subsidizing the Rwanda government whilst having to accept any vulnerable Rwanda refugees in return. It is also worth noting back in 2011 the Conservative party entered into a partnership with the Rwanda government.

The retrospective term is referring to immigrants current visa. Once that visa is required to be renewed then the new income requirement is in play. I would suspect any current spouse in the UK who could not meet the new financial requirements would have a claim under the right to a family life. This would arise because the immigrant is already in the UK and settled .

I have not seen any reports or comments from any off the main parties involved that dispute/contest the Telegraph report into the existence of the letters or content. The fact the Palace have said that the King is looking for the source of the leak, supports beyond any credible doubt that the letters do exist.

I have a preponderance of evidence going beyond probability that the letters exist and what the Telegraph reported is True. The most obvious that proves the existence of the letters beyond credible doubt is that the King as initiated an investigation into the source of the leak because only an handfull of persons have seen the letters.

That is something I cannot do. Firstly I do not think the actual letters are in the public domain. Secondly I would be surprised if any outlet would publish them. They are obviously private and deal with confidential matters and we're never intended to be in the public domain. However I have no reason to believe that what is published in the Telegraph is incorrect.Neither Meghan, Buckingham Palace Royal Sources or Royal corresponedents have contested the accuracy of the Telegraph article.

The letters were leaked to the Telegraph. In addition we know from Valentine Low they are genuine. Valentine Low initially cited Meghan as the leak. However after correspondence with Buckingham Palace and the Sussexes he acknowledged that this assumption was incorrect.

It is known that comments about Archie's skin colour was made. The leaked letters where the then Prince Charles acknowledges the comments were not made in malice.

Lady Colin Campbell named the royal concerned , some time ago. This incident is referring to a letter sent sent by Meghan to the RF after the Oprah interview .The book named 2 members of the RF who had a conversation regarding the letter.

This arises from the misspelt ลูก

I do not see how Braverman gets back into the cabinet. After being fired by 2 PM , and given her display of public disloyalty . It seems very unlikely any future PM will re-appoint her to a cabinet position.

Braverman will not be leader of the Conservative party either before or after the election. She does not have the required numbers of either MPs or members to get elected leader. However there is sufficient support to start a leadership battle/no confidence. If a leadership contest is initiated prior to the GE , the majority ofMPs/ members will see Braverman as divisive and will not support. If the Conservatives win the GE with Sunak as PM , he will be seen as a winner and cement his authority . If Cons lose the GE , this will be seen as a rejection of the incumbent regime , of which Braverman is part. Thus the party and the members will look for a fresh direction and face.

Never happened to me when I have used the PO here in Thailand. They do request the phone number , which I give , but they have never requested to physically handle my phone.

If going from Bang Sue train station to Mo Chit I would use the number 134 Bus which stops right outside the train station and terminates in Mo Chit bus station (domestic).

Do not forget Pensions will be covered under Article 23. Thus any tax paid in the UK on these sources of income can be used as credit for Thai tax due ( for pension income).

There is no obligation on the public to make the presumption of innocent. The public have the freedom to arrive at their own conclusions. It is only the state that is required to apply the presumption of innocent untill proven guilty by a court of law.