cleopatra2

I have a preponderance of evidence going beyond probability that the letters exist and what the Telegraph reported is True. The most obvious that proves the existence of the letters beyond credible doubt is that the King as initiated an investigation into the source of the leak because only an handfull of persons have seen the letters.

That is something I cannot do. Firstly I do not think the actual letters are in the public domain. Secondly I would be surprised if any outlet would publish them. They are obviously private and deal with confidential matters and we're never intended to be in the public domain. However I have no reason to believe that what is published in the Telegraph is incorrect.Neither Meghan, Buckingham Palace Royal Sources or Royal corresponedents have contested the accuracy of the Telegraph article.

The letters were leaked to the Telegraph. In addition we know from Valentine Low they are genuine. Valentine Low initially cited Meghan as the leak. However after correspondence with Buckingham Palace and the Sussexes he acknowledged that this assumption was incorrect.

It is known that comments about Archie's skin colour was made. The leaked letters where the then Prince Charles acknowledges the comments were not made in malice.

Lady Colin Campbell named the royal concerned , some time ago. This incident is referring to a letter sent sent by Meghan to the RF after the Oprah interview .The book named 2 members of the RF who had a conversation regarding the letter.

This arises from the misspelt ลูก

I do not see how Braverman gets back into the cabinet. After being fired by 2 PM , and given her display of public disloyalty . It seems very unlikely any future PM will re-appoint her to a cabinet position.

Braverman will not be leader of the Conservative party either before or after the election. She does not have the required numbers of either MPs or members to get elected leader. However there is sufficient support to start a leadership battle/no confidence. If a leadership contest is initiated prior to the GE , the majority ofMPs/ members will see Braverman as divisive and will not support. If the Conservatives win the GE with Sunak as PM , he will be seen as a winner and cement his authority . If Cons lose the GE , this will be seen as a rejection of the incumbent regime , of which Braverman is part. Thus the party and the members will look for a fresh direction and face.

Never happened to me when I have used the PO here in Thailand. They do request the phone number , which I give , but they have never requested to physically handle my phone.

If going from Bang Sue train station to Mo Chit I would use the number 134 Bus which stops right outside the train station and terminates in Mo Chit bus station (domestic).

Do not forget Pensions will be covered under Article 23. Thus any tax paid in the UK on these sources of income can be used as credit for Thai tax due ( for pension income).

There is no obligation on the public to make the presumption of innocent. The public have the freedom to arrive at their own conclusions. It is only the state that is required to apply the presumption of innocent untill proven guilty by a court of law.

If you need the letter translating just use a translation company. Since it is only 1 sentence it will not be expensive. If this is not an option, and given the language used will be formall , use the official Thai dictionary or an online translator .

The UK state pension is not included in any provisions of the UK Thai tax treaty. Thus both states have a right to tax. It would fall under the article to eliminate double tax , by using the credit method.

This only applies to government pensions. Private and the state pension do not fall into this category.

No I did not state that. I stated that Uk pensions with the exception of government pensions are taxable in both states. If your pension is a government pension then it is only taxable within UK ( with some further exceptions). The UK state pension is not a government pension.

For UK pensions payments are taxable in both states, with the exception of government pension. Double taxation is eliminated by recieving credit from UK tax paid against any Thai tax due. The new Thai Revenue instructions does not change this.

The issue is the OP is incorrect. The OP states this includes savings . When if you actually read the notice/instruction it is only refferinng to income from work activities and property whilst being a Thai tax resident

I think you misunderstand what the instruction is stating. The instruction is referring to Thai tax residents earning income from overseas in a work capacity or from property situated abroad. It is not refferinng to savings. Any monies earned overseas whilst not being a Thai tax residents is not relevant.

DTT do not work like that. DTT determine which state has taxing rights of a specific form of income. If both states have taxing rights on the same income then the provisions in the articles for elimination of double taxation takes effect . This will specify the method and how such income and tax relief is applied for each state.

I cannot open the link you provided without sign up. I am using Edge browser

It is a way of referring to an older person . It is not disrepectfull, rather usually used as a mark of respect.

Update Following discussions with various Thai persons , I am told the term means end of life , or to live at the end of life. Thus i stand corrected.

Thank you . I notice that Thai2English only gives one definition for ใช้ , to use .Wherass the official Thai dictionary gives 4 . However I note that it also gives making a living as possible use of ใช้ชีวิต. The use of ,ใน and บั้นปลาย can be combined and the Thai2English gives this as , finally , lastly, at last. The Thai dictionary also gives a definition of ใช้ being , compelled to carry out some activity. Thus I interpreted the phrase to mean that the requirement to carry out this activity ( when combined with ชีวิต to make a living) has become final and no longer required.

I would refer you to the official Thai dictionary. Means gone , used for retirement age.