Bday Prang

And he can't even find a stupid one

What do you expect, he appears to have regressed to the age of looking up naughty words in the dictionary

Oh I think most people, who are genuinely concerned about respecting Thai law and indeed Thai women manage perfectly well without any specialist legal knowledge of the laws relating to underage prostitution. or indeed the penalties for breaking them.

Most people, including regular users of bargirls, have never even heard of "the 1996 suppression of prostitution act" . The few amongst us with any knowledge of this legislation, will have their own, probably private, reasons for being so well informed, and in my opinion are to be treated with deep suspicion and kept at arms length. The only people who would feel the need to educate themselves regarding these laws are those who have already broken or are considering breaking them, and are wondering what penalties they might be subject to, if caught and convicted.

what is one of those?

surprised he was considered fit to fly

along with the prosecution of people helping out in the emergency, for visa offences

You sound scared, pull yourself together man for gods sake, were you like this before covid?? no of course you weren't. There are always seasonal viruses floating around, people catch them, a small percentage will die, that is normal. Stop worrying and stop trying to scare others

most peoples 1st class insurance does exactly that

In both cases If , as one would expect, the "rich" person has first class insurance then he pays nothing other than his "excess" his insurance will cover all costs for him, as stated in his policy, that is what he pays them for. It is then up to his insurance company to recoup their losses, Their first hope is to deal with the other persons insurance company but if the amount involved exceeds that companies limit for a single incident,then they would have the option of pursuing their remaining losses directly from the person responsible, through the courts Often not a financially viable option in the first of your examples, and probably practically impossible and prohibitively expensive in the second example you mentioned so, normally the cost will be covered by the insurance company, An incident like the that in the OP won't raise an eyebrow in insurance circles 1.3 million baht is nothing in the great scheme of things. Writing off a brand-new pickup and hospitalising all passengers would cost significantly more and is a daily occurrence, I wouldn't feel too sorry for the insurance companies, any losses they suffer are ultimately just passed on to their customers and I dread to think what the insurance premium costs per year for a rolls royce

I could not care less what happens to him or his bank account or indeed his immigration status, its none of my business.. and he needs to understand that other peoples visa / immigration status and the way they choose to obtain it is nothing to do with him whatsoever. These sanctimonious, self righteous, self appointed, immigration commentators make me want to puke, who do they think they are, ? I bet they were not very popular in school, or anywhere else for that matter

I would say its the retirees who have no wish to learn Thai and are quite happy to be confined to the "ghetto" only leaving it when accompanied by their wives

most of what you have posted is just plain wrong and you should stop confusing and misleading people. The non o visas are not, as you insist "discriminatory" they simply have different requirements, you keep asking why, but you are asking the wrong people. Ask an immigration officer, and his answer will be something along the lines of " because it is" or "because we say so " which is a standard answer any adult gives a pestering child. If you want "preferential treatment" change you visa, but try and get the right one this time eh? maybe you should consider using an agent this time. lol At least stop moaning and insulting people who are better informed than yourself

no it is not.

5 litre oil bottle is fine its all ive ever used, anyway whilst the rain is here you'll be using it pretty much every week so you won't be keeping it for long and no need to fill it up every time either. Then when the weather dries up you won't need it at all for about 5 or 6 months either

No they don't, but they can of course see the opportunity to exploit the hysteria they create in some people regarding this subject to their advantage. Some of the worst offenders are not even politicians in the accepted sense of the word Think WEF for starters

I can remember a certain infamous tiger sanctuary close to Kanchanaburi coming under intense scrutiny not that long ago and it did not come out of it looking very good at all. Was that a case of public ignorance ? No it wasn't. The only struggle those "conservationists" faced was staying out of prison

jesus, you seem like a glass half empty type of guy, have you considered writing speeches for doom goblin in chief Greta Thunberg? or is that where you sourced your detailed prediction

they keep a van on standby , just for those who ask stupid questions about them on here

Just buy a few books on the subject, learn to read a little and just go out and talk to people. Much better than sitting in a classroom and a lot more fun, you will also save a considerable amount of money

Who on earth told you that??

There is no requirement for tourists to hold travel insurance, there was no law passed in 2014/2015. what are you talking about? The only compulsory requirement for tourists to have insurance was during the covid years. , If people want to travel without insurance it is up to them and nothing to do with you "If a tourist arrives with no travel insurance then they should not be allowed to clear immigration until they purchase a policy at a booth/s that could be easily set up before arriving at immigration." No wish to sound patronising but there is a little more to providing insurance cover than "setting up a booth" You seem obsessed with inflicting more rules and regulations on people, and it looks to me that it's all because you were badly advised and consequently made a poor choice when choosing your own visa, and are somewhat envious of those who found a better solution than you. Non O -A really ???? ???

I don't think he even knew what questions to ask, either that or he comes from Albania or somewhere similar No state pension required for NON O visas in the uk either . money in the bank is acceptable and has been for years. It just isn't very clear on the website Why would it say over 50 with state pension when state pensions start at 65??

You have no need to explain yourself to him, or any of the other busibodies on here that consider themselves entitled to criticise others regarding visa matters, its none of their business. What sort of person is he anyway, who decides to move here and then calls for established practices regarding immigration matters to be made illegal? Especially when they have no bearing at all on his own circumstances (as he obviously does not use them) but will make life more difficult for others,? A spiteful, sanctimonious type perhaps?

Its worse than that, he's obviously another one who wants Thailand to become more like the miserable country he chose to leave. I really cannot understand people with that mindset. they must feel like fish out of water, I can guarantee he would not be in favour of a requirement regarding a certain level of Thai language ability (both written and spoken) and he obviously struggles to understand how things are, and have always been, done here