.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
brokenbone
-
Posts
2,792 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by brokenbone
-
-
22 hours ago, tifino said:
at least he didn't add more pelvic thrusts, than the allowable prescribed limits...
i view pelvic thrust as vital when i perform fon lep,
and have added a snap like twist with my hips to get things swinging
-
16 hours ago, Laza 45 said:
I can't believe how many people believe climate hoax nonsense.. truly unbelievable in the age of enlightenment.. or are we entering a dark age of superstition again?
you gotta admit it becomes repetitive after a while
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_eaxODT0oA0
-
1 hour ago, chainarong said:
Why should the biggies stuff their economy and people employed up, putting thousands out of work because coal mines are now all shut down in a knee jerk reaction that isn't going to solve anything except introducing massive anti social behavior, you need to change to renewable energy gradually and retain a power base load, if there's remedial action to be taken it should be taken at a speed that each country can afford, the only thing that can be noted is the air pollution covering most of China wasn't put there by panda bears.
i second this, and it is the course currently taken,
i.e western countries employing some experimental alternatives
all the while trying to figure out how to cram out any efficiency out of
it to make it commercially viable.
rest of the world shouldnt bother until if and when it becomes competitive,
save for extremely remote areas that the grid dont reach
and is too uneconomical to build
-
1
-
-
On 12/13/2019 at 9:52 PM, Jingthing said:
More like it SHOULD happen but probably won't.
I recommend people watch Simon Reeve's The Americas which touches on a lot of direct evidence of these changes already happening. Particularly dramatic is the testimony of a pilot in Alaska who has been flying over the same glacial area for decades.
even more dramatic is that arctic has been warming at the rate of 0.5 degree celsius per year and 97% scientists say theres no end to it.
what will become of earth ?, scientists ask
https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/69638689
-
cant russia just allocate a plot of land to extinction rebels where they
can build their utopia and live out their dreams ?
im sure a 30 year lease will suffice
-
1
-
-
On 12/14/2019 at 2:57 AM, Jingthing said:
That sounds really credible.
i can now supply data for every decade how the arctic is alarmingly melting since 1920.
just lemme know how much data you dont want and ill bring it right to your door
https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/168839462/18971805
-
2
-
-
3 hours ago, Eric Loh said:
data restored
-
1
-
-
Quote
Smaller nations had also hoped to win guarantees of financial aid
i propose the countries that can show falling sea levels, i.e countries around the
baltic recovering from glacier should be paid for their efforts instead, but instead of paying the states,
pay directly to the original citizens, a million krona per person sounds reasonable
-
27 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:
Sea level in the Gulf of Thailand is rising by 4 mm per year which is above global standard due to global warming. Pumping water out of the ground is an issue not the problem.
no, it isnt. if and when my data is restored on tvf ill show you the source of your disinformation
-
1
-
-
i wrote a post on two tide gauges in bkk area showing entirely different readings,
one predicting flood by 2050 and the other gauge predicting flood by year 8000.
i later referenced back to that post in two other threads where the issue
of bkk flooding came up
rather then post it all over again, but now that post is gone
first pic is a reply containing my original post that is now gone,
the others show or should show my link
what happened ?
-
15 minutes ago, Krataiboy said:
Brokenbone beat me to it, debunking the dubious "facts" in your response to the sources I cited in relation to arctic ice.
That said, here's an interesting alternative theory about what is going on with our climate. Don't waste your time checking it out with Snopes, a one-man- and-his-dog outfit about as reliable as Thailand's new Ministry of Truth.
such a fresh breath of anyone giving a sh!t looking at long term cycles,
activists invariably pick a recent peak and start history from there,
the big picture gets lost without fail
-
1
-
-
if i had known 20 years ago what i know now,
i would not have come, i would have picked a warm country belonging to EU
where i am a citizen and my stay isnt debated in any shape or form,
and i have rights there.
now my body hurt too much, i cant travel back
-
17 hours ago, scubascuba3 said:
Thais are the worst at just leaving rubbish on the pavement. They really need a massive advertising campaign and more bins
+1 on more bins
-
4 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:
So, how long do I have, Doc?
depend on which gauge you read, prognosis ranges from 30 to 6000 years,
activists unable to distinguish correlation from causation would undoubtedly say you got 30 years
-
1
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, stuandjulie said:
tell that to dinosaurs, also you really need to understand what global warming means, it does not mean everyone is getting hotter, eventually some places will get colder, it is also about sea levels, habitable areas, loss of life etc.
yo, einstein, dinosaurs hit an asteroid, the analogy isnt climate change.
the analogy is a fat fusion bomb.
other phenomena that has been speculated as wiping out species
unrelated to atmosphere is gamma radiation
-
8 minutes ago, Laza 45 said:
Something for the denialists to ponder.. no doubt will think normal and natural..
my forecast is that BOm wont under any circumstance display data pre 1907
-
17 minutes ago, Misab said:
Come on now, this video is produced by a sect not by scientists
its the truth and nearly everyone understand it, even alarmists
-
1
-
-
14 minutes ago, Misab said:
Also you write: “Many scientists believe the research that shows the level of CO2 is a function of temperature rise, not the cause of it.”
Could you please tell me which scientist there believe that because as far as I know, this is exactly the propaganda oil companies sends out. But it can be reality when sea water gets too warm and release the stored CO2 then we will really be in trouble
look from 19.15 to at least 21 minutes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYhCQv5tNsQ
-
1 minute ago, Misab said:
The various heating and cooling periods of the planet before man existed happened over thousands of years, wildlife had time to adopt. This time it is happening over a few generations
yes, we can see how stuff has escalated as of late
-
1
-
-
agree entirely, the scotts need to decide for them self
if they want to be part of eu
-
1
-
-
26 minutes ago, Laza 45 said:
If your attention span allows it ..check out the facts..
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/does-arctic-ice-doubt-reality-climate-change/
why am i not surprised the graphs started at the peak year 1978
to give the impression of a downward trend rather then a cycle ?
this has the fingerprint of creative accounting,
mother nature has its cycles, always had always will,
the alarmists cherry pick starting dates, hide temper and even destroy
previous data, and show a trend starting from a peak,
which can only go in one direction by default,
until it hit the opposite peak according to the wave progression
-
9 minutes ago, Brunolem said:
And glaciers are expanding worldwide...
And soon we will be able to cross on foot between Alaska and Russia, and maybe also between Norway and Canada...
let us pray next glacial period dont dip that deep
-
1
-
-
51 minutes ago, Laza 45 said:
The paradox of global warming and colder winters..
https://whowhatwhy.org/2019/11/23/the-paradox-of-global-warming-and-colder-winters-2/
no, you cant have your cake and eat it too,
fundamentally its multiple climate sinus waves,
entirely unrelated to co2 i might add
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
14 minutes ago, Bluespunk said:You can reject all the facts you wish, after all that is what deniers do, it doesn’t change the fact that man made climate change is a real.
yeap, we caused the last sinus wave evolution to the right in this graph
-
3
Activist Thunberg denounces "creative PR" in climate fight
in World News
Posted · Edited by brokenbone
what kind of science accept this cherry picking as legit statistics ?
on a 2nd thought, dont tell, only ever climate science
have such abysmal mathematical and analytical qualifications.
go back and finish your math lessons, for gods sake.
if you want to extract any data beside bias of the author out of this,
try divide 75 with 3146 for the consensus aspect. (2% consensus)
https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2009eo030002
In 2008 Margaret Zimmerman asked two questions of
10,257 Earth Scientists at academic and government institutions. 3146 of them responded.
That survey was the original basis for the famous “97% consensus” claim.
For the calculation of the degree of consensus among experts in the Doran/Zimmerman article,
all but 79 of the respondents were excluded. They wrote:
“In our survey, the most specialized and knowledgeable respondents
(with regard to climate change) are those who listed climate science as
their area of expertise and who also have published more than 50% of
their recent peer-reviewed papers on the subject of climate change
(79 individuals in total).
Of these specialists, 96.2% (76 of 79) answered “risen”
to question 1 and 97.4% (75 of 77) answered yes to question 2.”
The basis for the “97% consensus” claim is this excerpt:
[of] “the most specialized and knowledgeable respondents
(with regard to climate change)… 97.4% (75 of 77) answered yes to question 2.”
Q1: “When compared with pre-1800s levels, do you think that mean global temperatures
have generally risen, fallen, or remained relatively constant?”
76 of 79 (96.2%) answered “risen.”
Q2: “Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor
in changing mean global temperatures?” 75 of 77 (97.4%) answered “yes.”
Q1. When compared with pre-1800's levels, do you think that
mean global temperatures have generally risen, fallen, or remained relatively constant?
1. Risen
2. Fallen
3. Remained relatively constant
4. No opinion/Don't know
Q2. Do you think human activity is a significant contributing factor in
changing mean global temperatures?
[This question wasn’t asked if they answered “remained relatively constant” to Q1]
1. Yes
2. No
3. I'm not sure
Q3. What do you consider to be the most compelling argument that supports your previous answer
(or, for those who were unsure, why were they unsure)?
[This question wasn’t asked if they answered “remained relatively constant” to Q1]
Q4. Please estimate the percentage of your fellow geoscientists who think
human activity is a contributing factor to global climate change.
Q5. Which percentage of your papers published in peer-reviewed journals in
the last 5 years have been on the subject of climate change?
Q6. Age
Q7. Gender
Q8. What is the highest level of education you have attained?
Q9. Which category best describes your area of expertise?