kingdong

7 hours ago, Rookiescot said:

First point. Nope you never have answered the question.

Second point. It was you who said Thatcher smashed the unions. Now doing this did erode workers rights. This is why we ended up with a scenario of the EU having to pass laws to improve workers rights.

Third point. Its nice to hear that you have done OK. Its not so nice to hear that you are happy to see farmers struggling just to facilitate leaving the largest trading block in the world for no apparent reason. Or at least no reason you can give.

Point one i hsve on several occasions pointed out the answer but you appear to be suffering from short term or should it be selective memory loss.second point what did the eu do for workers rights?you haven,t got any " w orkers rights " if you,re self employed or on a zero hour contract see above you,ve also been told this on several occasions before. Third point no i didn,t really do ok as i had to study on both occasions for professions now obsolete,trading block?if it would have remained a " trading block " i.e a common market we would have still been in it,what has having " freedom of movement " imposed on you got to do with being in a trading block?

7 hours ago, Rookiescot said:

First point. Nope you never have answered the question.

Second point. It was you who said Thatcher smashed the unions. Now doing this did erode workers rights. This is why we ended up with a scenario of the EU having to pass laws to improve workers rights.

Third point. Its nice to hear that you have done OK. Its not so nice to hear that you are happy to see farmers struggling just to facilitate leaving the largest trading block in the world for no apparent reason. Or at least no reason you can give.

Farmer up the road from me runs 13 bootfairs annually,hes making far more than he did from farming without all the hassle of taking on casual labour he still does a bit of pick your own and has never been as well off,although he tells the taxman hes on the bones of his harris.

6 hours ago, bannork said:

Was it Hancock who said 10 years? 

Oven ready deals are instant. No need to wait. 

Are you referring to tony hancock?

15 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

You are correct, Thatcher crippled tge Unions and the result was ordinary working people being ‘done over’ in the work place.

Ordinary working people backed Thatcher and now blame immigrants for the mess the loss of work place benefits.

Wind forward a few decades, the working class back a Brexit funded by the hyper wealthy - but you think it will end well.

Suckered twice Insay.

Not really chomper,the " ordinary people " backed thatcher believing her lies about destroying the unions and golden dawns and got shafted however for her policies to work required a glut and a surplus of labour,enter freedom of movement and the nasty little traits of current working practises it bought with it,then we,ve got the party of the working class,momentum,sorry labour who famously proclaimed "we sent out the search parties to rub the right wings noses in it "natrually this had a detrimental effect on the indigenous working man.so i personally prefer the tories (as do the majority of the country,as proved by boris,es resounding victory in the last peoples election) as although i think the vast majority of politicians are 2 bob slags,at least you know you know where you are with the tories.

6 minutes ago, Rookiescot said:

In what way have "indigenous" natives of the UK suffered because of EU membership?

Destroying workers rights is a good thing?

So who is going to pick those radishes? You? 

First point i,ve answered this several times to you in the past.second point stop putting words in my mouth find a clairvoyant and ask thatcher.third point don,t eat radishes if the radish industry goes for a burton the farmers will have to evolve like i,ve had to do in the past.

16 hours ago, Andy from Kent said:

 

That would be a disrupting requirement for Thailand to impose.

Wonder how the administration at the time would deal with the issue of family separations?

There's no guarantee all Home Countries will allow for the  immigration of a spouse and family.

On your last point hardly surprising with thai girls track record for having on their toes to seek the bigger better deal once they,ve got permission to stay.

5 hours ago, sherwood said:

Sorry fella I do not have all the answers. I used to carry a Glock 17 under my car seat here in Thailand until I realised I would use it if pushed so I sold it back to the cop who sold it to me.

My point is you can not rely on the Police to protect you, never going to happen, not for your average citizen. Enough said, the cop in question was a scumbag. I do not blame the force as they are just incompetent.

The police are prevented from doing their job by the forces of political correctness and are too scared to uphold the law,you,ve only got to look at some of the comments on here to see what they,re up against.i used to own a glock 17 9 mm good gun light and with mag extensions 18 round capacity,wish i still had it today,is a farang allowed to own a licensed handgun in thailand legally?

2 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

But don’t quite the right to demonstrate, peaceful assembly or free speech.

Peacefull assembly?you having a laugh? It was breaking the law,bought in regarding corona,and it didn,t look at all peacefull,if they wanted to act like men then expect to be treated like men.

3 minutes ago, sherwood said:

Well if anyone asks, just call it a walking stick or even a pool cue.

I understand your comment 

Or better still quote the right of self defence enshrined in british common law like tony martin the norfolk farmer did and see how far you get

2 hours ago, Surelynot said:

It did seem a strange approach taken by the police...........easy for me to say, but I would have had police on hand....stood well back and let the whole thing fizzle out of its own accord.......it was not like they were a 1000 plus drunken Rangers fans going wild......

And had the mobs actions caused a third wave of corona and resultant travel and lockdown occuring,that would have been wrong too.

10 minutes ago, sherwood said:

Police are not in the business of protection. Their roll in modern society is solely revenue collection.

I do not blame the Police force for this act only the individual. The girls can protest all they like but nutters will be nutters  so if you are worried, stay home or carry a big stick.

Sorry if that sounds like I do not care but truth be known, I could care less. A very nasty world is out there just waiting. 

Carrying a big stick in public for self protection is a criminal offence.and you will be prosecuted,best not chance it and stay in.

4 minutes ago, 7by7 said:

You find the murder and mutilation of a young woman a suitable subject for jokes?

Shame on you.

I find the aftermath of this sad event a joke.

1 minute ago, roo860 said:

No doubt Rent a Mob turned up, bloody idiots.

Yeah who probably were protesting about gun ownership in the uk folowing dunblaine and got pistols banned in the uk ( apart from northern ireland ) well guess what girls,they,re never going to come back,pepper sprays and stunguns are sect 5 firearns,so looks like you,re going to have to rely on the police for protection.

On 3/12/2021 at 5:32 AM, JonnyF said:

Don't forget to file it in your little black book under JonnyF ????.

But actually I've shared before on TV, so No it's not particularly interesting.

In fact I recall you enquiring which University I studied at, but as I have had problems with some fairly creepy internet stalkers on TV in the past (not naming any names of course ????) I declined to divulge????.

I too decline to give away any details of my personal past,too many sad bitter people with nothing better to do on tv and other forums for that matter,forums can be of value for amusement and information,but you,ve got to sort through a lot of chaff before you find any wheat.

4 hours ago, Kwasaki said:

You are so naive the other way around happens to, I have been in that position myself.

I didn't really know until help was provided how many women have a problem..

To make easier for someone like you to understand with your self opinionated rhetoric is not possible.

If a male is a victim is a victim of domestic violence and defends himself hes a wifebeater,if he do,es nothing hes a wimp,bit of a no win.

You,ll probably find your next application will be gone over with a fine tooth comb.

4 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

There’ nothing about ‘presumed innocent until proven guilty’ in magna carta, and while the presumption of innocence is a requirement in the judicial process I know of no such requirement being held over an individual when expressing a personal opinion outside the judicial process. 

So I got the Guardian, where did you pull your magna carta gaff from?

 

 

Ever heard of sub judice? Obviously not.

To quote the fab four " money can,t buy you love " wipe your mouth and just pay as you go in future.

59 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Was the killer cop from Brixton/Tower Hamlets?

Which " killer cop "? Isn,t everyone presumed innocent until proven guilty?some bit of nonsense that go,es back to the magna carta,still i see your source came from the guardian which would explain it.

On 3/12/2021 at 3:56 AM, JonnyF said:

Yeah they better have a lot of female bus drivers, taxi drivers, doorpeople, barwomen etc. In fact, why 6pm? Just lock up all men forever.

The whole idea is ludicrous. Typical of the Green Party. No thought given regarding the reality of their proposals. Just fluffy, idiotic virtue signaling.

Great,the green party showing their true colours and what to expect if you vote for them.