Dan O

Actually the safety gear is only 1 aspect considered. There could be other issues that kick in that people don't consider depending on the policy which is my point to those that claim they have full coverage without question. The insurance company is in control of determining exclusions and then it's up to you to fight them over it, which is generally a long drawn out process

You appear to be just wanting to antagonize the people you claim are russian. it sounds more like your acting just as racist tool. If the people are causing you concern go to the juristic agent and report them and let them handle it.

I read the full article and certainly don't need you to explain it. You're the one that questioned the story and was insisted to know more, like you have a personal stake in the issue. Of course the story isn't completely accurate and there were probably other motives involved. In the end does it really matter? The end result is still the same. Is that clearer for you?

The sad part is the news media seldom if ever follow up on these cases so the end result isn't public in the majority of them. The just keep plowing forward as a new case will pop up in a day or two and the old ones will vanishinto the ether

Sorry if you don't like when people disagree with you. Typical trumpette response. Only thing you seem to be able to do is post your canned response as a way to avoid dealing with comments on here. No need to reply as I know what you'll say. Have a great day

The only implication behind what I wrote is their are always exclusions to Every insurance policy. I never said they were hidden. Hopefully people read them (most do not) and understand them but in the end the insurance companies hold the decision making process based on a variety of factors which are not spelled out and are situation specific. So you could be in the right from your view and the insurance company can claim otherwise. Then it turns to a pissing match on collecting which usually isn't a speedy process by any means

Apparently you didn't read what I wrote. I never said life in prison, you did. I said repetitive violent offenders need to held accountable. When there's a clear pattern of assault and violence that's a huge red flag but I guess you may be color blind

There is something that can be done if the govt chose to. Proper driver training before missing any license. Enforcement of traffic laws. Improve the road conditions to provide proper space for the scooter riders just as a start. Stop the underage children from riding scooters and provide better transportation options to accommodate their need to travel.

And that's what I said but maybe you didn't read.

Actually you pretty close to the mark on this. The hush money in itself is fairly insignificant but when you couple that with the timing of his campaign and trying to hide it is the basis for many of the charges he's facing in this indictment.

For a repetitive offender like him certainly shouldn't be out on the street repeating the same or worse anytime soon. If you think he should I'm sure you would have a different view had he killed a loved on of yours. Some people are habitual criminals without regard for their actions. Defending him shows a good deal about character

You dont seem to follow your own advice. Just like all the trumpettes, IMO

You need to post a source for your claims according the standard you reply to me

Plenty of reports available to you but it appears you can't be bothered. If you can't be bothered then apply your same comments to your own posts

There goes that Trump love again. Maybe a reach around is in order. Google may help jog your brain for the countless and baseless claims he's made

He's a narcissist so he believes he's always right.

And where exactly are you getting the info from? I'd love to see a link for that

Thai justice system strikes again. How many times do we see these stories of repeat offenders killing people, burning down family homes, stealing etc. Just. Give a Wai and fruit basket and your good to go.

Are you on the police force working the case?

Not sure why you think it was a deposit when the article says it was in the dispenser either way it doesn't matter, the guy didnt take it and turned it in. Good on him

Yes there is. Google or reading is not your strong suit http://www.thailawforum.com/database1/Treaty-of-China.html

They were targeting the father for money not the student. The baffling thing is the father blow off the contact for a day or 2 not believing his daughter was kidnapped even after receiving pics showing her with the kidnappers. I would not want to live the rest of my life knowing I helped get my child killed due to my inaction

I may be mistaken but VOA's can't be extended

Not sure what the resort owner has to do with this story but they put him right in the middle of it without cause.

Not sure why your replying to me about extradition. I think my comment was pretty clear