fredwiggy

Like I mentioned, in moderation soy doesn't cause any problems. I myself eat chicken at least three times a week, and have eaten soy products all my life, along with many others I have trained in gyms and given diet advice to, and it has never caused an issue. There have been a few studies showing how soy might hurt some, but the evidence against such is far outweighing any for it. A Chinese man who ate a huge amount of fried chicken doesn't compare to the millions of others who have been eating fried chicken weekly for all of their lives. Fried chicken down south in the US is a given, and you don't hear of it happening there, besides the ones who are obese from a bad diet. Gynecomastia is different. It happens with an imbalance of oestrogen and testosterone and isn't related to diet in any studies. Soy protein is used by many bodybuilders to add more protein to their diets instead of using milk. I used it for years when I was in the gyms, and never saw anyone affected by it, besides the ones using steroids, and they were few and far between, the ones who developed gynecomastia.

Thanks. I take better care of her than her mom, who gave her other two daughters to her ex's and their families at ages 8 and 10. Doesn't really want the job, it's mainly for show and cuteness. Age takes away the cuteness and the child becomes a burden to a lot of moms here, so they're often given to grandparents. I will move back home eventually with her, and her mom knows it would be a better choice for living here, but she isn't ready to do that yet, because of the mentioned ideations.

Soy products in moderation aren't bad for anyone not allergic to them. It's when a family uses soy as their main source of protein when a chance for Kawasaki disease can happen. Children here are fed a lot of chicken, eggs, pork and fish and soy , although used, isn't a mainstay, so there is very little risk. Soy has been said to raise estrogen levels but that's still not the case in moderation.

I edited my comment, saying she does have a Thai passport, her mom has it with her. We are divorced and I have joint custody.

I have only the US passport which is still valid. Does she need a visa, did your kids? She's only 6 so is going with me. Her mom has her Thai passport and I'm sure she will give it to me.

Yes, it has nothing to do with milk consumption, and the doctor????, is wrong. Milk, and all dairy products, are totally unnecessary for humans, and is a problem to those lactose intolerant. You can get all the benefits that milk gives from a lot of other foods. Milk is a convenient way for children to get some nutrients, as they like the taste and it's cheap and easy to give it to them. You can get Vitamin D from the sun, egg yolks, fish and other sources, and calcium from soy milk, soy products, vegetables , nuts etc. I was allergic to milk from the get go, and my mom gave me soy milk, which is what I still drink today. Height here is hereditary, and I see everyday tall Thai's anyway, which shows this. My ex wife's family is all tall,or at least average height, and her mom is average and dad wasn't tall.

I'm asking around, here and with Visa companies, who of course want my business, what I'll need to bring my daughter to the USA for a visit this November. She is 6, was born here, has a US passport and of course has US citizenship by birth to a US citizen. Asking others who are in the same boat, US citizens, who have brought their children, born here, to the US specifically, and what they had to do. I have joint custody but from what I hear from others, I really don't need a letter from her mom for permission to travel, as her signing the passport gives my daughter permission to travel already. I'm sure she would give me the letter anyway, as it's just for a visit this year. I'm more asking about if she needs a visa to travel to a country which actually shes a citizen of.

No, this is true in Thailand. In other countries, if a Thai woman lives there, she was either born there or moved there to work or be with a husband. If she left her husband, she has been introduced to other nationalities and especially if she is still living there and working, and has her own money, she will meet others based on attraction. She might still be attracted to Thai men living there, or anyone else for that matter. When a Thai woman is independent, she will usually choose her own kind.

Was about to post much of what you've said, but you beat me to it. Most Thai women, and other nationalities, prefer their own kind. The ones that look for farangs, have either been used and abused by locals, or they've watched their friends and family do the same, and listen to their advice. Of course we make more than the average local, and that's another selling point, but attraction isn't a choice, and a lot are attracted to the farangs they choose. I have seen gorgeous Thai women for the last 20 years plus, both in the US and when I moved here, with fat,drunk farangs, most of who never exercised a day, because of their wallet size. Every woman has their own agenda regarding a mate. Here, there and everywhere.The poorer the population, the more chance women will look more for the cash, and disregard the looks.

Of course not, because it's right on.

No,show him that a 66 year old man can still get it going against an arrogant egotist that looks at women as objects, something I've always abhorred. Like him, I've spent time in a gym. 48 years to be exact, and unlike him, I don't think women are as stupid as he thinks they are. Him saying only 3% of men are suitable, being somehow superior to the other 97%, is a childish, narcissistic attitude that anyone who isn't a narcissist can see. He himself tells how bad his relationship was with his family, how his dad abused and neglected him. Prime candidate for an adult narc. That's how they get to be like him. He was married, and is still dating, saying he's a serial dater. That's a user. One who's only agenda is having as many women as he can, with no intention to get married again. Why would an intelligent woman want that kind of creature? One that has low self esteem, looks at only the outside (he's okay looking to me, and I'm a man). Women like his money, that he wrote a few books, with other's help, borrowing much of the better material from books I've read years before he wrote his. The material saying how you treat a woman after you've dated her awhile. Why include this in your book if you have no intention to marry again? Because that part sells the book to women, and men who do want a lasting, permanent relationship. Not the 3% that only want conquests. His advice works of course, because a lot of women fall for an alpha's approach and attitude, not understanding most are only using his ideas to get laid. I'm sorry if I may have bored you with a long paragraph, but some are able to comprehend long paragraphs.

Not 4th anything. But when I'm with someone, she's the only one. I was replying to his chauvinistic comments.

He was doing okay before he said. "It is different for a man". After that, and with a good look, I thought he was Corey "Narcissist" Wayne's alter ego. He thinks 3% of men are real men, and the rest are beta weak males. Wish I could run into him and show him what a beta could do. Sad fact is, a lot of women like these alpha morons, showing their lack of good sense, and they mate with these types, and like Corey says, the smart woman looks for a good genetic male to have children with, saying in effect, that the other 97% have defective children, and that only the children from alpha males are superior offspring. People made this egotist a millionaire, and although some of his book, borrowed from other authors, tells how to treat the women you get well, his agenda is to have sex with as many as possible, pointing out that a lot of women are defective also. He hasn't had a successful relationship in his life, meaning one that went the distance. A lot of us haven't also, until we find the right match, but many of us are looking for a woman to stay with, and not just as an object to be used, cook, clean, take care of the kids, while he has others on the side. A man can take care of more than one woman? Yes, he can buy a few to keep around, that is, if they're willing to be one of many and not just one special one that has all of his love and commitment. Being on a show shows what he is, and hopefully as many women as possible can be shown this, so they can see what a true "alpha" male is.

And of course, looks can be deceiving. Many a monk here is unstable and has gone wrong, seeing that some go to the temple to escape from punishment. Same thing in the military back years ago in America. Ted Bundy, Jeffrey Dahmer, the policeman who killed 22 toddlers here, among many others, were normal looking men until they found them out. Those with some mental illnesses, especially narcissism and psychopaths, can be very charming. A lot of people think about hurting others that do them wrong, like his wife did, but restrain beforehand because of the consequences they'll face.

Yes, you must wear silly clothes to camouflage yourself from their superior senses. Like I mentioned, some animals have to be kept within the carrying capacity of the land they live on, as overpopulation brings about many problems. Disease spread, more accidents with autos, decimation of flora, and sometimes, when animals get accustomed to living closer to humans because their habitat is developed, attacks from the animals themselves. If you aren't a vegetarian, then you eat meat. Ask yourself where that meat comes from. If you live here, you know they will eat anything that moves, and there is very little conservation besides the national parks. In America, for example, there are more deer now than ever before. A lot of that is because hunters dollars goes towards habitat renewal or acquisition. Anti hunters contribute nothing much but problems. If you haven't had wild game, you should try it. It's lean, healthy and is sold in many higher class restaurants. For another example, there are over 1.8 million car-deer accidents yearly, from where around 200-400 people die and over 50,000 are injured. This is with hunting in every state. Imagine if hunting were stopped.

No, but I was a gun salesman when I lived back in Texas

Taiwan is barely in the top 20 in health care. Belgium has always been up near or at the top, along with other European countries. 1. Belgium – 83.8 2. Japan – 83.2 3. Sweden – 83.1 4. Switzerland – 82.4 5. Norway – 82.2 6. Germany – 81.1 7. Iceland – 81.1 8. Finland – 80.9 9. France – 80.4 10. Malta – 79.8.....................................................For hip replacement, Germany, South Korea and India are at the top, and Singapore is close. As far as Thailand, Which hospital is best for hip replacement in Thailand? TOP HOSPITALS Vejthani Hospital Bangkok, Thailand. Bumrungrad International Hospital, Bangkok. Bangkok Hospital. Sikarin International Hospital, Bangkok. Praram 9 Hospital, Bangkok...........................................................If you could go anywhere....................................https://www.magazine.medicaltourism.com/article/what-are-the-best-countries-for-hip-replacement

No, you don't need a gun to enjoy nature. You do need a gun for hunting legal quarry. And guns for protection from the world's maniacs is necessary. I don't condone killing humans for any other reason than self defense. This man went overboard as I've said, like so many do who are cowards, unstable or in the heat of the moment before logical thinking.

If you understood hunting, you would understand that to most of us, it isn't about the killing as much as being out in the woods in nature. Hunting is as necessary to the survival of some species as food. Hunters contribute millions to preservation of woods and wetlands for their quarry, and we eat what we kill, and some donate to the homeless. When hunting stops, some animals over populate, and reach over the carrying capacity of where they live. The real problem with animals is humans encroachment on their habitat, which leads to that over population, decimation of plants ,car accidents, and attacks on humans invading their territory. Just a footnote. Their was a leopard called the Man Eater of Rudrapryag in India, who went from village to village, nightly, and killed, and only sometimes ate, over 120 (reported) humans before a hunter killed him. Leopards, and tigers, kill hundreds yearly in India still, and they only fear humans when they are hunted. Horrible way to die.

No legal hunting in Thailand. I fly back and will eventually move back there. And most other countries have hunting although yes, I'm an American.

My reasons are hunting. Others might be to protect yourself or family from those criminals.

Okay, saying ignorance of it's highest order may have been a bit harsh, Mr Harsh. You are right about some women, and men, thinking cheating is a joke. It's the worst possible betrayal, and deserves punishment yes, but the way he did it only buried himself and hurt his kids. She, and many others like her, always get what they deserve. In the end, a cheat ends up all alone, or with someone that doesn't want to be there, and is miserable but can't see a way out because of financial or children responsibilities they think they can't handle being single. A lot stay for this reason, thinking they can have a wife (or husband) and another partner. It's the difference between someone who has integrity and someone that doesn't care. People die everyday because they are cheaters, and no one wins if the other partner does them in. A person should want to stay with another. Not by force or deception. If you can't be a couple, leave. There are many others that think like you do. A narcissist should end up with a narcissist, and empaths should be together. Like's choices in partners are the most important we make.

Yes, they should. Here, and everywhere but, this was a legally purchased gun. Doesn't matter anyway, because as we've all seen, many are killed here with machetes. A gun just makes it easier in the wrong hands. And offering a reward would only see people turning in guns they had lying around, maybe from past family members, and they figured they didn't need it anyway. People who think they need guns for self defense or criminals won't turn guns in.

That comment shows ignorance in it's highest order. First, a beta isn't a passive person. That's what morons like Corey Wayne, a malignant narcissist, wants clueless other men to believe. The problem in this world is that narcissists, disguising themselves as "alpha" males, are the controllers, who want things their way because they were neglected and or abused by their parents in childhood, so when they get to the adult stage, they turn all that hatred out on others around them. Beta males are the ones who love their partners, not abuse, neglect or cheat on them. A beta male can be a bodybuilder, boxer, weightlifter, track and field competitor or a regular businessman. It's the betas that take care of their families, while the alphas look to use as many women as they can, including married ones. No, this man took revenge on a woman, who might have cheated on him more than twice, but in a way that is cowardly. Yes, he could have divorced her, gotten joint custody of the kids, and found another more reliable woman. Just the fact she was talking online to others makes her guilty. he just took it to extremes. That kind of woman will always be taken advantage of eventually, as she was a sneak and maybe a cheat, and he would have been better off without her. There are millions of good looking women here, and to waste your life on one that's like her, and lose your freedom, and the kids, is the worst possible choice he could have made. A man isn't masculine when he hurts others, but when he protects others around him. The mark of a gentleman is one who has others comfortable around him. Yes, he wasn't passive, but being a cowardly alpha male that has to do this , takes away his masculinity altogether.

Before you post, you should research a little. I don't make opinions, like yours, because opinions mean nothing. facts are facts. The soldiers are there to kill. The disturbed soldiers, and all countries have them, are there to kill, and rape, and torture, because they are, disturbed. Guessing that most of any nationality is for anything, is just a guess. If there are any polls out there, you can bet they are biased, forced or said in fear. Many controlled people will do what they are brainwashed, or forced to say. Russia has a vote, but they are still quiet about what they say. A lot might be for the war, but hundreds of thousands have left Russia because of what goes on there, and the war on Ukraine is one of them. Many Russians have family and friends in Ukraine, and you can bet they're not happy about what's going on.