Jump to content

Hi from France

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    1,011
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Hi from France

  1. 1 minute ago, vinny41 said:

    I am sure Boris has got Frosty working day and night to produce a list ready

    You are sure of that? Source? 

     

     

     

    @candide

     

    You can see the position has shifted the UK has abandoned any idea of retaliatory measures. 

     

    They are "generously" sharing now 

    Quote

    Boris Johnson ponders sharing Dutch-made AstraZeneca doses with the EU

    The Prime Minister is understood to be prepared to compromise over the distribution of supplies manufactured at the Halix facility

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2021/03/22/boris-johnson-ponders-sharing-dutch-made-astrazeneca-doses-eu/

     

    Operation "vaccine-sharing" seems geared towards success ????

  2. 2 minutes ago, candide said:

    In case of reciprocal retaliations (which is not a scenario I advocate), UK's strategic problem is that 

    Nice reasoning, but in this case, I do not think that we need to get that far. 

     

    Every British politician who was interviewed realise that the UK cannot afford an open fight with the EU. 

     

    Especially given the ugly economic situation of the country.

     

    So this arm-twisting is likely to work, the UK could even have no choice but cooperation 

    Quote

    But Burns said Britain should be willing to help EU member states get their vaccine production and rollout back on track

     https://www.politico.eu/article/boris-johnson-urged-to-keep-cool-as-uk-and-eu-square-up-on-vaccines/

    • Haha 1
  3. Yeah it definitely seems the UK won't pick up a fight with the EU  

     

    Quote

    Britain could bring a case against the EU at the World Trade Organization but that would be a slow process — so it could instead engage in immediate retaliation and turn the issue into a full-blown trade war, experts noted. "I suppose that, if the EU blocked exports and singled out Britain for political reasons, the U.K. could — and would — bring a case against the EU at the WTO," said Anton Spisak from the Tony Blair Institute.

     

     

    Quote

    But MPs — while expressing anger at the EU over its threats — argued retaliation would be a bad idea. “All trade wars risk impoverishing the citizens of both sides,” said former trade minister Conor Burns — a close friend of Johnson's. “Vaccine trade wars risk needlessly killing people and must be averted."

     

    Source https://www.politico.eu/article/boris-johnson-urged-to-keep-cool-as-uk-and-eu-square-up-on-vaccines/

     

    Maybe Boris Johnson should just put Frost in charge? 

    • Haha 1
  4. Politico's coverage of the story 

    Boris Johnson urged to keep cool as UK and EU square up on vaccines

    The moment of truth will come on Thursday, when EU leaders discuss their course of action at a Council summit

     

    Even the ERG is backing down 

    Quote

    David Jones, deputy chair of the pro-Brexit European Research Group, said the U.K. must not impose a lipid blockade “simply because I don’t think it’s the way civilized countries should operate.” 

    https://www.politico.eu/article/boris-johnson-urged-to-keep-cool-as-uk-and-eu-square-up-on-vaccines/

     

    My take is that

    * the EU will stop exporting arguing that the UK has had plenty and has been keeping it all. 

    * the UK doesn't want to escalate as it would highlight how selfish they have been while the EU was sharing its own production.

     

    Are British politicians kind of ashamed? Seems so to me, but please share your own take... 

  5. 1 hour ago, stuandjulie said:

    I think you find they will be, the irony of all this is after Macron saying not for over 65's (and others) then saying not for under 55's hardly anyone in Europe wants it anyway !

    While this is clearly a mess, we still very much like our production to be dedicated to the countries who need it more than the UK, including us, of course. 

     

     

     

    We in the EU also think the UK should do what we do: share, at least partly, its life-saving vaccine production with the rest of the world instead of keeping it all.

    • Haha 1
  6. 3 hours ago, Bkk Brian said:

    But you've already said you believe nothing the UK government says, so when you discuss or speculate what they do now, its totally irrelevant correct?

    I observe what the UK national-populist government says often proves wrong and that the UK signature and commitments have less value nowadays. 

     

    But I am still interested, even if it all needs to be taken in weighing whether it is true or not (or partially true) and whether commitments will turn into reality or not. 

    • Haha 1
  7. 5 minutes ago, Blue Muton said:

    Which would explain the fake news 

    ... the question is why it appears here and now

     

    I'm not sure the rules of this forum say something about spreading fake news

     

    Now back on topic: will our EU stop delivering the UK? And if so, will the British government retaliate? 

     

     

    In the UK, things are going pretty well at the moment and I think this means "no" 

    Quote

    UK ministers have urged the EU to stand by its commitments on vaccine supplies ahead of expected discussions between Boris Johnson and European counterparts over a row centred on a production plant in the Netherlands.

     

    Quote

    Helen Whately, the care minister, repeatedly refused to say if the UK would hit back if Brussels placed an export ban on vaccines amid a bitter disagreement over contracts to supply the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine.

    “I don’t think it’s very helpful to speculate at the moment,”

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/mar/22/britain-urges-eu-meet-commitments-covid-vaccine-supplies

     

    all bets are off, I think BJ will try to look good but will have to admit that the EU is doing the best thing. 

  8. 9 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

    Is it that fact that "currently" the the UK has donated $735 million to Covax to help the developing world have vaccines. The EU has donated $489 million.

     

    Or the fact that the UK will donate all surplus vaccines to poorer countries?

     

    The links you are selectively demanding, 

     

    I'm not really "demanding" I'm just telling you that personally I do not find UK government or UK government signature credible. Especially promises to take part in foreign aid.

     

    For the purpose of our debate I would find a Guardian article or another source comparing vaccines really produced and sent by the EU and the UK. 

     

    If you take promises by the present UK government for granted, I believe that you are making a mistake. Now you are free to do so! 

    • Like 1
  9. image.png.f97262d07a6734f94247442a04ce295b.png

    2 hours ago, bluedoc said:

    Why send AZ vaccine to countries that don’t use it and also say it is not a good vaccine.

     

     

    Fair point !

     

    1/ We do have plenty of citizens already vaccinated with their 1st jab, so we need the second jab.

     

     

    2/ Considering most EU countries are using the AZ right now (except 3 northern Europe countries we it's still suspended), so we payed it, we need it 

     

    In France the AZ is available directly from your GP or local Pharmacy and there is a lot of demand

     

    Now while AZ production is riddled with problems, Deutsche Qualität pfizer *is* delivering  and production is scaling up very fast. Now the demand is huge (and remember, unlike the UK we have been delivering to the whole world).

     

    until now, more than 300 exports operations have been approved, one was refused.

     

     

    It is likely the EU will now stop exporting to countries than do not reciprocate, I mean the UK

     

    • Haha 1
  10. 1 hour ago, vinny41 said:

    Sorry No you don't get to dicated which links are an acceptable credible source on this forum

    Are you saying any links provided from the EU websites are no longer acceptable credible sources

    You either accept the links or you don't its that simple

    @vinny41 you are free to post whatever link you please (within forum policy I guess).

     

    I'm just saying that for me, given the current situation, I do not consider UK government sources, or UK government signature to be 100% credible.

     

    Of course I can read it and take it into account, but I think we do need to be very prudent "once bit twice shy" as they say. Or "take it with a grain of salt" ????

     

     

    Now, there are still quality official UK sources with more independence from the national-populist government like the UK parliament

     

     

    • Like 1
  11. 1 hour ago, Sujo said:

    Seems another downside of brexit. UK will just have to use its own.

    Yeah, the fun thing is without Brexit, the UK would probably have done exactly the same.. 

     

    But with the UK being a EU member, it would have been impossible for the EU to do anything against a member country, and certainly not stop our plants to serve the UK first

     

     

    Within the single market, this private "UK first and the rest of the world can die" contract would have got us then.. 

     

    Brexit sweet Brexit ????

    • Like 2
  12. 7 hours ago, Bkk Brian said:

    Like the EU already does?

     

    The UK has donated $735 million to Covax to help the developing world have vaccines.

    The EU has donated just $489 million.

    I do not believe for one second the UK is helping more than we do, whether in money really sent or vaccine doses shared. 

     

    Every info I get is the national - populist government slashing Official development assistance (ODA)

     https://www.concern.org.uk/news/overseas-aid-budget-cuts-explained

     

    Please share a credible exhaustive source with us. i. e. not a tabloid nor a UK government or consultancy firm payed by said government

    • Haha 2
×
×
  • Create New...