RanongCat

You must be joking ? Retaliatory destruction of family homes has been endemic by IDF since Netanyahoo gathered his nasty clansmen .

Must be nice to have upgraded rose coloured tint to the rainbow spectrum !

As terrorists obviously ! FGS !

Evacuate to "safety" ? Joke time

Twisted . Convenient. Which is it ? Hamas are sheltering in tunnels or posing as civilians on the ground zero surface?

Maybe a hip replacement ? Maybe one that squeaks so it will give an excuse for being a tightwad ?

It seems that you have lost track of which topic you are defending genocidal intent in . This one is discussing Biden and Sunak ( US & UK ) and diplomacy as relates to Gaza & Israel. I did not make it anything. Do you suggest all armies are advised by the US & UK ? Small wonder the world is rapidly turning into a warring mess.

Where and when have I stated that civilian deaths overall do not occur in any conflict? You may wish to deflect from the issue of "disregard" of strategicably avoidable civilian casualties as a historical factor in US military strategy. As staunch "allies " of Israel and provider of 3 billion $US annual funds I am sure there is a significant degree of "advice" provided as a marker to such funds. Maybe before your breastfed years but do you know how many bombs to almost no effect were rained down on Laos killing 2 million non combatant peasants and leaving a legacy of unexploded ordinance that annually still kills people ? And even in those times the cost?

Not at all . But that if it is as a result of disregard for "collateral damage" in terms of the lives of women and children to suit a military objective then I would have to resign myself to acknowledging that it is the result of typical US military tactics as advised/prescribed to IDF strategy.

Variations on the challenge for survival. Or..... pushin the limit on suicidal activity. Same thing but the boring bit is the mundane trap of learning the tecqniques.

🤔

Perhaps incidentally related but why then so much lack of revulsion to Ukrainian attacks on Russian villages which have zero military content let alone involvement? The world does watch and note such.

So now you attribute the intimidation of Hamas as justification for bombing civilians caught between directives which in any event result in death ? If Hell is real you are destined !

I have no objection to the removal of terrorist control of a population that has been deprived of the will to resist persistent intimidation from all sides. I do have objection to the mass murder of same population excused by argument of no alternative. There is this insidious false projection of polarized ideology which not just implies that any objection to IDF tactics which criminally contravene International conventions is "proof" of support for Hamas. That mindset may assist the more base ideology of Islamaphobes but is a negative to the humanitarian perspectives same would expect if applied to self identity.

Whoa ! What is the everlasting cry for "Jewish" justice and the objection to genocidal motive and from where and what did it originate in "modern" times?

Except that the last election in Gaza was in 2006 and any valid attempts to try again have been thwarted by "unrest". The simplistic idea that Hamas rules by popularity and not by intimidation is ignored for the convenience of enduring "blame" on impoverished Gaza Palestinians.

The dribble at the end

In direct answer to the question .........no !

Not a movie that by title I would ever find any interest in viewing. But given that there is a moment you find memorable enough to mention while in support of mass killing of women and children I am not surprised.

Nice try Mossad !

Need I ?

That question stands ! Have you bothered to consider a small thermobaric explosive which I doubt the Hamas have ?

Why do you assume I am "behind" in content? Regardless the international perception about many aspects is not altogether sympathetic or accepting of propaganda .

Not scary. Just real. You are getting increasingly reactive and jittery Sweety . Losing confidence in righteousness ?

So based on the prevalence of links and images provided by media controlled by ? My participation is irrelevant to the veracity of fact. Or are you operating on the principle of repeated lies eventually create a truth ?