Danderman123

It sounds like you are reciting the talking point of the day. Unfortunately, this talking point has come up before, and has been rebutted many times. Judge denies Trump’s third attempt this week to delay hush-money trial Keeping Up With the Trump Trials: So Those Delay Tactics Really Worked, Huh?

Because the coverup wasn't discovered until much later. DA Bragg came into office in 2022, and indicted Trump the next year. And Trump's lawyers have been delaying ever since.

Once again, the trial isn't about Trump's adultery in 2006, it's about writing checks in 2016-17 to cover up his adultery. The coverup wasn't uncovered until 2018-19. You don't seem to know the basic facts of this case.

Have you considered that the Trump lawyers' principal defense is delay?

Bernie Sanders' loss in the Dem primaries in 2016 is not germane to this topic, which is about Donald Trump's illegal recruitment of fake electors.

This is typical Republican spin claiming that tax increases for billionaires somehow impact the middle class. You have been fooled. But I suspect that showing you the numbers won't make a difference to you.

Bernie Sanders never ran in a national presidential election with electors. But your implication with "what about" is that you acknowledge the criminality of fake electors.

Nope. I don't think you have thought this through.

The law is clear that no one is an electors until and unless their candidate is the certified winner in their state. Claiming you are an elector when you aren't and sending that claim across state lines is a Federal crime. Or a state crime while the fraudulent documents are within the state.

The problem isn't alternate electors. The criming part came when they signed documents claiming they were the duly elected electors. Which they weren't. Of course, all presidential candidates have slates of potential electors, but they can't claim they are electors until and unless the election is certified. If their candidate isn't the certified winner, they can't claim they are certified electors. Which is what these future felons did - in writing, sent to Washington DC.

Stories with "might", "may" or "could" in the headline rarely pan out.

@rattlesnakewill literally ignore your post, as the information is outside his paradigm.

Reminder: Biden got 80 million votes in 2020. That's a lot of drag queens.

Disappointing: Songkran is over, but I am still waiting 15 minutes for a Bolt taxi.

Sure. He was going to go down for the January 6 stuff. Sure indictment for the classified documents. The Stormy Daniels case was in process for a long time. So, yeah, these cases have nothing to do with his candidacy

The problem is that what was published online was never verified.

One problem is that you are citing content from an alternate version of the diary, which was published online: https://news.yahoo.com/fact-check-posts-claim-contents-181600349.html

On the particular issue of the diary, your information is wrong, but you don't seem to understand that.

There was zero line at Suvarnabhumi Immigration today. Which was weird because I was the last to disembark from a crowded A330.

Most of the claims about Biden from the Trump side are projection - Trump claims that Biden does what Trump does, or would like to do. Example: "sleepy Joe". The Nazis used projection sparingly, but Trump does it often.

You don't seem to understand the concept of "chain of custody". Nor that someone who steals a diary for political purposes is likely to edit the contents for political purposes.

I can't get some of them to close the door to the bathroom.

Don't bother. The diary was stolen, there's no chain of custody, so anything in it is suspect.

Woman who stole and sold Ashley Biden diary sentenced to month in jail and home detention Your internet friends must be working overtime to make you look foolish here. I'll give you a hint: when someone passes you a talking point, check it out before posting.

Are you referring to Ashley's stolen diary?