Danderman123

The question is whether any of these state investigations follow the trail all the way to Washington DC, given that Georgia already has.

So you prefer Russia?

Nothing in your post helps Trump prove his innocence. A DA promising to convict a perp doesn't make the perp innocent.

It's not like they think much when they post, they just pass along whatever talking point shows up in their Inbox. That's why sometimes multiple Trump fans will post the same talking point the same day.

It sounds like you are reciting the talking point of the day. Unfortunately, this talking point has come up before, and has been rebutted many times. Judge denies Trump’s third attempt this week to delay hush-money trial Keeping Up With the Trump Trials: So Those Delay Tactics Really Worked, Huh?

Because the coverup wasn't discovered until much later. DA Bragg came into office in 2022, and indicted Trump the next year. And Trump's lawyers have been delaying ever since.

Once again, the trial isn't about Trump's adultery in 2006, it's about writing checks in 2016-17 to cover up his adultery. The coverup wasn't uncovered until 2018-19. You don't seem to know the basic facts of this case.

Have you considered that the Trump lawyers' principal defense is delay?

Bernie Sanders' loss in the Dem primaries in 2016 is not germane to this topic, which is about Donald Trump's illegal recruitment of fake electors.

This is typical Republican spin claiming that tax increases for billionaires somehow impact the middle class. You have been fooled. But I suspect that showing you the numbers won't make a difference to you.

Bernie Sanders never ran in a national presidential election with electors. But your implication with "what about" is that you acknowledge the criminality of fake electors.

Nope. I don't think you have thought this through.

The law is clear that no one is an electors until and unless their candidate is the certified winner in their state. Claiming you are an elector when you aren't and sending that claim across state lines is a Federal crime. Or a state crime while the fraudulent documents are within the state.

The problem isn't alternate electors. The criming part came when they signed documents claiming they were the duly elected electors. Which they weren't. Of course, all presidential candidates have slates of potential electors, but they can't claim they are electors until and unless the election is certified. If their candidate isn't the certified winner, they can't claim they are certified electors. Which is what these future felons did - in writing, sent to Washington DC.

Stories with "might", "may" or "could" in the headline rarely pan out.

@rattlesnakewill literally ignore your post, as the information is outside his paradigm.

Reminder: Biden got 80 million votes in 2020. That's a lot of drag queens.

Disappointing: Songkran is over, but I am still waiting 15 minutes for a Bolt taxi.

Sure. He was going to go down for the January 6 stuff. Sure indictment for the classified documents. The Stormy Daniels case was in process for a long time. So, yeah, these cases have nothing to do with his candidacy

The problem is that what was published online was never verified.

Ladies with Tomboys are mostly accepted. Ladies with ladies are not. They will usually hide their relationships. Ladies with money can have a side "kik". In Pattaya, it's prestigious to have a young kik, the younger, the better.

One problem is that you are citing content from an alternate version of the diary, which was published online: https://news.yahoo.com/fact-check-posts-claim-contents-181600349.html

On the particular issue of the diary, your information is wrong, but you don't seem to understand that.

I define a sponsor as someone who sends money for nothing to bargirls. By your definition, every customer is a "sponsor".

There was zero line at Suvarnabhumi Immigration today. Which was weird because I was the last to disembark from a crowded A330.